0% found this document useful (0 votes)
200 views

Question Bank

The document provides details of an experiment involving orthogonal metal cutting tests, including measurements of cutting forces, chip thicknesses, tool geometries, and material properties. It then lists multiple calculation problems involving determining values like shear angle, shear strength, friction coefficient, specific cutting energy, and cutting/thrust forces based on the experimental data and metal cutting theories. The problems cover a range of topics in orthogonal cutting including Merchant's theory, Lee and Shaffer's theory, and relationships between shear angle, friction, and cutting/thrust forces.

Uploaded by

Vishnu Gupta
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
200 views

Question Bank

The document provides details of an experiment involving orthogonal metal cutting tests, including measurements of cutting forces, chip thicknesses, tool geometries, and material properties. It then lists multiple calculation problems involving determining values like shear angle, shear strength, friction coefficient, specific cutting energy, and cutting/thrust forces based on the experimental data and metal cutting theories. The problems cover a range of topics in orthogonal cutting including Merchant's theory, Lee and Shaffer's theory, and relationships between shear angle, friction, and cutting/thrust forces.

Uploaded by

Vishnu Gupta
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Boothroyd Chapter-2 Problems 1-13, page 104-107: 1.

In an orthogonal cutting test on mild steel, the following results were obtained: Cutting force Fc Thrust force Ft !ncut chi" thic#ness ac Chi" thic#ness a0 &idth of cut aw 'ength of contact between chi" and tool lf &or#ing normal ra#e ne = 900 N =4 0N = 0.$ mm = 0.% mm = $. 0 mm = 0. mm = 0 deg.

a. Calculate the mean angle of friction on the tool face . b. Calculate the mean shear strength of the wor# material s. c. Calculate the mean frictional stress f. $. In an orthogonal cutting test the following conditions were noted: &idth of chi" (width of cut) !ndeformed chi" thic#ness Chi" thic#ness &or#ing normal ra#e Cutting force Thrust force = $. mm = 0.$ mm = 1.0 mm = * deg = 900 N = 900 N

a. Calculate the shear angle b. Calculate the mean shear strength of the wor# material. +. In an e,"erimental turning o"eration where low*carbon steel was being machined using a carbide tool, the following data were obtained: Cutting force Fc = 1 #N Thrust force Ft = 0. #N &or#ing normal ra#e ne = $0 deg. -eed f = 0.141 mm &or#ing ma.or cutting*edge angle r = 4 deg. /e"th of cut (bac# engagement) ap = mm Cutting s"eed v = $ m0s Cutting ratio rc = 0.$ &or#"iece diameter dw = 100 mm &or#"iece machined length lw = +00 mm. 1stimate from the abo2e date:

a. b. c. d. e. f. g.

The s"ecific cutting energ3 of the wor# material ps. The "ower re4uired for machining Pm. The undeformed chi" thic#ness ac. The width of cut aw. The shear angle . The mean angle of friction on the tool face . The time ta#en to com"lete the machining o"eration.

4. 5how that in metal cutting when the wor#ing normal ra#e is 6ero, the ratio of the shear strength of the wor# material s to the s"ecific cutting energ3 ps is gi2en b3

s
ps

1 rc 1 +rc $

. In an orthogonal machining o"eration with a ra#e angle of deg. and an undeformed chi" thic#ness of 1 mm, the chi" thic#ness is found to be + mm. &hat will the chi" thic#ness be if the ra#e angle is increased to 1 deg assuming 1rnst and 7erchant8s first theor3 holds, that is, $9 : ; * <ne = =0$. >ssume the friction coefficient is not influenced b3 changes in ra#e angle. ?. /eri2e an e,"ression for the s"ecific cutting energ3 ps in terms of the shear angle 9 and the mean shear strength of the wor# material s in orthogonal cutting. >ssume that the shear*angle relationshi" of 1rnst and 7erchant a""lies, that is $9 : ; * <ne = =0$ %. >ssuming that the shear angle theor3 of 'ee and 5haffer a""lies, namel3 9 : ; * <ne = =04, show that the s"ecific cutting energ3 ps will be gi2en b3 ps = s (1:cot 9 ) where s is the mean shear strength of the wor# material. @. -or the orthogonal cutting of a "articular wor# material, it is found that the length of chi"*tool contact is alwa3s e4ual to the chi" thic#ness ac and that the mean shear stress at the chi"*tool interface is e4ual to the mean shear stress on the shear "lane. 5how that, under these circumstances, the mean co*efficient of friction on the tool face A must be e4ual to or less than 40+ and that when it is e4ual to unit3, the shear angle 9 is e4ual to the wor#ing normal ra#e ne. 9. In the cutting e,"eriments using a shar" tool with 6ero ra#e, it was found that the chi"* tool contact length was e4ual to the chi" thic#ness a0. It was also found that the shear stress along the tool face was constant and was a constant "ro"ortion R of the shear strength of the wor# material on the shear "lane. a. /eri2e an e,"ression for the cutting force Fc in terms of ac, aw, s, R and 9 . b. /ifferentiate the e,"ression to obtain the 2alue of 9 to gi2e minimum Fc.

10. >ssume that in an orthogonal cutting o"eration, the frictional force -f on the tool face is gi2en b3 KsA0 where K is a constant, s is the a""arent shear strength of the wor# material, and A0 is the cross*sectional area of the chi". 5how that the following relationshi" e,ists between the mean coefficient of friction A on the tool face, the shear angle 9, and the wor#ing normal ra#e ne

K sin( n e ) cos( n e ) +1

K cos $ ( n e )

11. -or the machining of a "articular wor# material, it is found that the shear angle 9 is alwa3s e4ual to wor#ing normal ra#e ne. >ssuming that the shear strength of the wor# material in the stic#ing friction region on the tool face is the same as the shear strength s of the material on the shear "lane and that the length of the stic#ing region is e4ual to the chi" thic#ness a0, deri2e e,"ressions for the cutting force Fc and the thrust force Ft in terms of s, ne and the cross*sectional area of the uncut chi" Ac. >lso calculate the 2alue of ne for which Ft = 0. Neglect the forces in the sliding*region on the tool face. 1$. In machining test it was found that for a "articular material the following relation a""lied: $9 : ; * <ne = =0$. >lso, when the rac# angle <ne was $0 deg, the coefficient of friction was 1.$. a. &hat would the chi" thic#ness be if in a turning o"eration, the feed was 0. mm and the ma.or cutting angle was ?0 degB b. If the cutting force is limited to + #N and the s"ecific cutting energ3 of the material $ CD0m+, what ma,imum de"th of cut can be ta#enB 1+. >ssuming the in an orthogonal machining the distribution along the normal stress is along tool ra#e face is linear, becoming ma,imum at the cutting edge and reducing to 6ero at the end of chi" tool contact length, dri2e an e,"ression for the mean coefficient of friction A between the tool and the chi" and tool in terms of: the ma,imum normal stress Em, normal stress E0 at which real and a""arent areas of contact become e4ual, and the coefficient of friction region As. Solved Examples rom !hosh a"d #all$% (chapter 4; page no. 195 onwards) 1. /uring orthogonal machining with a cutting tool ha2ing a 10 ra#e angle, the chi" thic#ness is measured to be 0.4mm, the uncut chi" thic#ness being 0.1 mm. /etermine the shear "lane angle and also the magnitude of the shear strain. $. /uring an orthogonal machining o"eration on mild steel, the results obtained are t1= 0.$ mm, t2= 0.% mm, w= $. mm, = 0 , FC= 9 0N, FT=4% N. (i)/etermine the coefficient of friction between the tool and the chi". (ii)/etermine the ultimate shear stress 5 of the wor# material.

+. 7ild steel is being machined at a cutting s"eed of $00 m0min with a tool of ra#e angle 10 . The width of cut and the uncut thic#ness are $mm and 0.$mm, res"ecti2el3. If the a2erage 2alue of the coefficient of friction between the tool and the chi" is 0. and the shear stress 5 of the wor# material is 400 N0mm$, determine (i) the shear angle and (ii) the cutting and the thrust com"onents of the machining forces. 4. -ind out the order of magnitude of the cutting com"onent of the machining force during orthogonal machining of machining of mild steel with an uncut thic#ness of 0.$ mm, the width of cut being $. mm. &"solved Examples onwards) rom !hosh a"d #all$% (chapter 4; page no. 282

1. The chi"s from an orthogonal cutting o"eration with an uncut thic#ness of 0.$mm for 2arious ra#e angles are

t2

1 0.4

10 0.

0.?+

0 1.1+

Calculate, for each chi", the corres"onding shear angle and shear strain and "lot them against . $. The cutting and the thrust com"onents of the machining force during orthogonal machining of aluminum with a ra#e angle of 10 are found to be +1$N and 1@ N, res"ecti2el3. (i) 1stimate the coefficient of friction between the tool and the chi" (ii) If the ra#e angle is reduced to 0 , #ee"ing all the other "arameters the same, and if the coefficient of friction also remains unchanged, estimate the new 2alues of - C and -T, using 7erchant8s first solution. +. /uring orthogonal machining with a ra#e angle 10 and an uncut thic#ness 0.1$ mm, the 2alues of -C and -T are found to be 1%N and $1%N, res"ecti2el3. The a2erage is also measure and found to be 0.4+mm. 12aluate the machining constant for the wor# material. 4. &hen the ra#e angle is 6ero during orthogonal cutting, show that

Uc

(1 r ) r 1 +r $

. /uring an orthogonal cutting test, the obser2ations made are t1 = 0.$ mm t2 = 1.$ mm w = $. mm F = 0 Fc = 900 Fr = @10

Calculate the mean shear strength of the wor# material.

?. 1stimate the cutting com"onent of the machining force during the orthogonal machining of aluminum allo3 with an uncut thic#ness of 0.1 mm, the width of cut being $. mm. %. > metal is being cut orthogonall3 with a tool with 6ero ra#e angle. 5how that the rate of heat generation in the shear "lane can be e,"ressed as FC (1 r ) .

You might also like