0% found this document useful (0 votes)
62 views

1 - Assignment

The document provides an overview of the history of school finance in Texas from the establishment of elementary schools under Mexican rule in 1824 through the Gilmer-Aiken Acts of 1949 which standardized elements like mandatory attendance, ten month school calendars, and minimum teacher salaries. It also discusses the role of property taxes in funding local school districts and differences in funding levels between districts.

Uploaded by

thedirtydozen98
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
62 views

1 - Assignment

The document provides an overview of the history of school finance in Texas from the establishment of elementary schools under Mexican rule in 1824 through the Gilmer-Aiken Acts of 1949 which standardized elements like mandatory attendance, ten month school calendars, and minimum teacher salaries. It also discusses the role of property taxes in funding local school districts and differences in funding levels between districts.

Uploaded by

thedirtydozen98
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Owen M.

Hurt 13 APR 2014

Week One Assignment, Part 1 Reviewing History of Texas School inance The earliest significant event in Texas school finance histor was the esta!lish"ent of ele"entar schools ! the #e$eral %onstitution of the &nite$ Mexican 'tates in 1(24. The govern"ent esta!lishe$ the i$eal that )u!lic e$ucation is i")ortant to a countr . This i$ea hel)e$ create the "ain e$ucation s ste" we still have to$a in Texas. *nitiall the govern"ent+s lac, of e$ucational esta!lish"ent in Texas over the ears gave the citi-ens another reason for see,ing in$e)en$ence. This )rovi$e$ the stance that Texas citi-ens value )u!lic fun$s going towar$s the e$ucation of our outh. The next significant event revolves aroun$ creating fun$s for school $istricts. Presi$ent .a"ar+s esta!lishe$ lan$ grants to fun$ %ount Per"anent 'chool #un$s in the "i$ 1(00+s. This esta!lish"ent $i$ not )rovi$e enough school fun$s/ !ut it create$ the i$ea on how Texas coul$ generate "one for )u!lic schools. The i$ea of using lan$ to generate fun$s for schools ha$ a lasting i")ression on Texas citi-ens. To$a school $istricts get a )ortion of their fun$s through local school $istrict )ro)ert taxes. The last significant event loo,s at the esta!lish"ent of unifor" schools an$ fun$ing. The 0il"er1Ai,en Act in 1242 affecte$ how schools woul$ get an$ use fun$s. Things li,e "an$ator stu$ent atten$ance/ ten "onth school calen$ar/ an$ a statewi$e "ini"u" salar have their roots in this !ill. 3hen over (04 of a school $istrict !u$get is )ersonnel ou can see how these regulations change$ Texas schools to a "ore unifor" s ste". This cause$ the nu"!er of

Page 1 of 5

school $istricts in Texas to go fro" 4/500 to 2/200 i""e$iatel . Over the next 60 ears "ore consoli$ation of school $istricts woul$ occur to get us to aroun$ 1/200 school $istricts.

Week One Assignment, Part ! State orm"la #nsights an$ reflections 3hen it co"es to fun$ing Texas schools "ost citi-ens refer to their local )ro)ert taxes. 3hat is interesting is that tax rates are in a sense esta!lishe$ ! the state/ !ut it can+t !e a state tax !ecause that woul$ "a,e it unconstitutional. The local school !oar$s get to esta!lish their tax rates an$ ho"estea$ exe")tions. The confusing )art is the re7uire"ents of the state for aca$e"ics an$ fun$ing nearl esta!lish a state )ro)ert tax. Most school $istricts $o not offer "uch of a ho"estea$ exe")tion an$ the tax rates a"ong $istricts are not $rasticall $ifferent. The tax rate unifor"it $oes not "atch the stu$ent+s $iverse nee$s that are all across the state. The 8Ro!in Hoo$9 fun$ing i$ea was !orn out of a lawsuit. *n theor this is a great i$ea/ !ut it has not $one enough. The $iscre)anc !etween $istricts an$ a"ount of fun$ing )er stu$ent is still significant. This significance causes frustration for the whole school co""unit . :ver co""unit wants what is !est for their stu$ents an$ woul$ agree that the teacher is the !iggest co")onent of this. The !etter 7ualit of teacher will result in !etter learning for stu$ents. The attractiveness of a high salar is one co")onent of getting 7ualit teachers. The first ear teacher salar for $istricts can give ou an i$ea of the $iscre)anc in fun$ing. These will range fro" the low ;30/000+s to the low ;50/000+s. 'tate fun$ing for schools have alwa s ha$ re7uire"ents attache$ to it. Pu!lic schools all have to "eet the sa"e re7uire"ents ! T:A. *n the 1220+s the Texas legislature $eci$e$ to start fun$ing charter schools an$ since then charter schools have ex)an$e$ across the state. The concern is that there is a )erce)tion that the fun$ing an$ re7uire"ents are the sa"e for !oth

Page 2 of 5

charter an$ )u!lic schools. 3hile the )u!lic schools receive "ore fun$s the also receive "ore re7uire"ents. %harter schools are creating "ore co")etition a"ongst school $istricts for stu$ents. :ach school $istrict will have their own !enefits for stu$ents. The $iscre)anc !etween fun$ing an$ re7uire"ents causes "ore confusion a"ong e$ucators an$ concerne$ citi-ens.

Week One Assignment, Part % &'"ality, &'"ity an$ A$e'"acy Equality <efinition= :$ucational )rogra"s are si"ilar for all stu$ents. :xa")les= ')orts facilities an$ o))ortunities at a school $istrict are si"ilar regar$less of gen$er. Pu!lic school gra$uation $i)lo"as have si"ilar re7uire"ents across the state. Equity <efinition= All stu$ents have their e$ucational nee$s "et. :xa")les= 'tu$ents with $isa!ilities la!ele$ un$er 'ection 504 receive a$$itional in$ivi$uali-e$ e$ucational services in the classroo" an$ on the state assess"ent. 'tu$ents receiving ')ecial :$ucation services "a receive a$$itional e$ucational o))ortunities $uring the long su""er !rea,. Adequacy <efinition= 'chool $istrict fun$ing creates success for all stu$ents. :xa")les= 'chool $istricts la!ele$ as %ha)ter 42 will receive a$$itional fun$s. 3eighte$ Average <ail Atten$ance is use$ to fun$ schools !ase$ on their stu$ents+ nee$s. Week One Assignment, Part ( )om*aring +istrict #m*rovement Plans Austin *'< an$ 'eal *'< are two $ifferent school $istricts with si"ilar goals for our stu$ents. Austin *'< is a large ur!an school $istrict while 'eal *'< is a s"aller rural school $istrict. Austin *'< has "ore stu$ents in so"e of its high schools than 'eal *'< has in its whole school $istrict.

Page 3 of 5

The goals for each $istrict are clear in assisting all stu$ents towar$ achieving aca$e"ic success. The $iverse nee$s of stu$ents are i$entifie$ through a$$itional resources an$ staffing that are allocate$ throughout the )lans. The all $a )re1,in$ergarten )rogra" is i$entifie$ in !oth )lans. 'eal also has a tuition !ase$ )re1,in$ergarten )rogra" that is for those stu$ents that woul$ not have otherwise 7ualifie$ for )rogra". >oth school $istricts also i$entif )arent involve"ent as a co""on goal. The Austin *'< )lan has "ore total )rogra"s/ !ut 'eal *'< has a goo$ nu"!er given the si-e of the school $istrict. #un$ing sources an$ how the are allocate$ are $ocu"ente$ where nee$e$ in the i")rove"ent )lans. 'tate co")ensator e$ucation is re7uire$ to !e liste$ in $etail in i")rove"ent )lans. >oth 'eal an$ Austin have those i$entifie$ for use to )urchase )rogra"s an$ fun$ staff "e"!ers. Austin *'< )rovi$es a !rief !rea,$own of the school $istrict+s !u$get. This hel)s to ex)lain where all the "one is allocate$ even if it is in ?ust a si")le chart. 'eal *'< $oes not )rovi$e this !rea,$own of fun$ing in the i")rove"ent )lan. Their fun$ing is onl foun$ to !e $etaile$ in )articular goals an$ o!?ectives that are re7uire$. The changes for 'eal *'< have $etaile$ $escri)tions an$ fun$ing allocations )rovi$e$. The a$$itional e"otional an$ social su))ort for stu$ents is an exa")le of this $ocu"entation. Austin *'< gives an overview of all )rogra"s an$ fun$ing regar$less of whether it has !een in )lace for several ears or is !ran$ new. The $istrict i")rove"ents )lans loo, ver $ifferent. 'eal *'< uses a ta!le loo,ing for"at that is onl seen in Austin *'<+s A))en$ix >. Austin *'<+s )rogra" $escri)tions are a lot "ore $etaile$. The are )ut in a )aragra)h for" that allows for "ore ela!oration. There is also infor"ation a!out the )rocess for collecting in)ut an$ who is involve$ in the )rocess. The recor$ for co""ittee atten$ance is "uch li,e a teacher+s atten$ance chart. Minutes fro" the

Page 4 of 5

"eeting are t )e$ u) an$ inclu$e$ in the )lan. The give $etails a!out the "eeting so ever thing is trans)arent to all who rea$ the". 'eal *'<+s $escri)tions in the )lan are li"ite$ to the re7uire$ infor"ation. 'eal +s "inutes are also ver "ini"al with onl highlights of the "eetings. S,&) Self-Assessment an$ Reflection - )om*etency . Area/ The su)erinten$ent ,nows how to= @@*@@@ a))l )roce$ures for effective !u$get )lanning an$ "anage"ent. @@*@@@ wor, colla!orativel with !oar$ of trustees an$ a))ro)riate )ersonnel to $evelo) $istrict !u$gets. @@%@@ facilitate an$ evaluate effective account au$iting an$ "onitoring that co")lies with legal re7uire"ents an$ local $istrict )olic . @@%@@@ esta!lish $istrict )roce$ures for accurate/ effective/ ethical )urchasing an$ financial recor$ ,ee)ing an$ re)orting. @@%@@ ac7uire/ allocate/ an$ "anage resources accor$ing to $istrict vision an$ )riorities/ inclu$ing o!taining an$ using fun$ing fro" various sources. @@'@@@ use $istrict an$ staff evaluation $ata for )ersonnel )olic $evelo)"ent an$ $ecision "a,ing. @@'@@@ a))l ,nowle$ge associate$ with )ersonnel "anage"ent/ inclu$ing re7uire"ents relate$ to certif ing/ recruiting/ screening/ selecting/ evaluating/ $isci)lining/ reassigning/ an$ $is"issing )ersonnel. @@'@@@ "anage oneAs own ti"e an$ the ti"e of others to enhance $istrict o)erations. @@%@@@ $evelo) an$ i")le"ent )lans for using technolog an$ infor"ation s ste"s to enhance efficienc an$ effectiveness of school $istrict o)erations. @@*@@@ a))l legal conce)ts/ regulations/ an$ co$es as re7uire$. @@%@@@use revenue forecasting an$ enroll"ent forecasting to a$$ress )ersonnel an$ !u$getar nee$s accuratel .

Page 5 of 5

You might also like