Lecture Notes 7 Design of Truss I
Lecture Notes 7 Design of Truss I
Trusses
Fabricated from various steel sections available, jointed together by welding or by bolting usually via gusset plates. Plane trusses and space trusses. Bridge trusses and roof trusses. Members supporting heavy loads Members having longer span. Saving in weight.
Type of Trusses
Roof truss
Supporting truss
Bracing truss
Truss System
Space truss
Truss Analysis
Pin-joint truss analysis method of joint, method of section, numerical simulation several analyses may be needed for different load combinations Analysis of load bearing members such as rafters Assessment of stresses due to eccentricity of the connections Assessment of the effects of joint rigidity and deflections
5
Roof Truss
Roof rafters spanning more than 20 m can be designed Usual span-to-depth ratio of steep roof trusses is 7.5 to 12 Panel width should be constant Even number of panels avoids cross-braces Diagonal web members should be in tension under worstcase loading Inclination angle of the diagonals should be between 35 and 50 If at all possible, the purlins and verticals should closely coincide
6
Roof Truss
Out-of-Plane Load
Wind loads acting on the upper half of the end walls Frictional drag effects on the roof, and Accumulated lateral bracing system restraint forces
Forces in the longitudinal bracing system in the plane of the compression chords
10
N * N t
= the capacity factor, see Table 3.4, =0.9 Nt = the nominal section capacity in tension
N t = Ag f y and N t = 0.85k t An f u
Ag = the gross area of the cross-section fy = the yield stress used in design kt = the correction factor for distribution of forces An = the net area of the cross-section fu = the tensile strength used in design
11
N * N s and
= the capacity factor, =0.9
N N c
*
Ns = the nominal section capacity determined in accordance with Clause 6.2 Nc = the nominal member capacity determined in accordance with Clause 6.3.
12
Gusseted connections
Predominant when rivets and bolts are used for connections. Transfer of forces is indirect and not aesthetically pleasing. Advantage: easier to make all members intersect at the theoretical node pointin contrast to direct connections, where some eccentricity is unavoidable.
Pin connections
Generally used when aesthetics are important
13
Open Sections
Gusset-Free Connections
(a) centre of gravity lines intersect at the node; (b) eccentric connection can be a practical way of detailing but additional bending stresses are induced
14
Typical Sections
(a) to (f ): commonly used in welded construction (though (a), (c), (d) and (e) may be bolted) (g) to (k): common sections used for chord and web/diagonal members
15
(a) Gussetless construction using Tee-chords; (b) gussets are required where diagonals carry large forces; (c) Tee-diagonals and chords, gussetless; (d) and (e) node detail for heavy trusswork, and (f ) riveted/bolted nodes
16
(a) portal-type Pratt truss (b) Fink truss with large eaves overhang (c) alternative chord cross-sections
17
Closed Sections
(a) sandwich plate splice; (b) sandwich plate splice at chord reduction; (c) jacket splice; (d) welded butt splice; (e) welded butt splice with reducer, and; (f ) flange splice.
18
(a) Direct contact overlap connection without eccentricity; (b) direct contact overlap connection with eccentricity; (c) direct contact gap connection with/without eccentricity (with chord face reinforcing plate shownwithout reinforcing plate is very common); (d) T-joint with chord face reinforcing plate (for very heavy loadsotherwise no reinforcing plate is also popular); (e) connection detail at support (note vertical stub portion with flange splice for lifting onto support); (f ) concentric reducer where chord section is stepped down (alternatively, if the overall section is not stepped down then the wall thickness is reducedthe latter applies for RHS/SHS); (g) slotted-gusset connections; (h) flattened end connections, and; (i) slit tube connections. 19
Example
20