DesignContractorGuide Vol2
DesignContractorGuide Vol2
Design Manual
Volume Two
Facility Design Guide
ESD-160 October 2007
ESD 160 Design Manual
Volume Two: Facility Design Guide
REVISION LOG
Item (Table of Contents,
Chapter, or Appendix)
Rev.
No.
Date
Entered
Initials
Instructions:
After revising your ESD as described in the revision
transmittal, enter the item revised, date entered, and initial
above.
SDCWA
San Diego County Water Authority
Engineering Department
ESD 160
Design Manual: Volume Two
Facility Design Guide
October 2007
Copyright 2000 The San Diego County Water Authority. The information provided herein is for the convenience and use of the San Diego County Water
Authority and its member agencies. Any use of the information by any entity other than the San Diego County Water Authority is at such entitys own risk,
and the San Diego County Water Authority assumes no liability for such use.
Prepared by: Jacobs Engineering, Edited by: Jacobs Engineering
Reviewed by: Water Authority Departments
Approved by: Michael T. Stift, Director of Engineering
For additional copies, call Ron Hartnett at 858-522-6878 or vist the Engineering Department offices at the
Water Authority, San Diego
SDCWA Design Manual Validation
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
October 2007 ii REV 00
ESD 160 Design Manual: Volume Two (Facility Design Guide)
Introduction
and use
The ESD 160 Design Manual: Volume Two (Facility Design Guide)
documents the practices and standards that are used for design of
projects at the San Diego County Water Authority.
Personnel involved in design of Water Authority projects shall adhere
to the practices and procedures described in this document.
Engineering management shall be responsible for enforcement of
these practices in their respective design management of projects.
Revisions and
maintenance
This manual is intended to be a living document that evolves to meet
changing San Diego County Water Authority needs.
Engineering management continuously monitors the design activities
for its various projects and will identify refinements to or additional
practices and procedures.
The Engineering Department is responsible for maintaining this
manual, for revising chapters as practices and procedures change,
and for issuing manuals and revisions to appropriate personnel.
Users may suggest changes or additions to this document by
submitting a Change Request Form to the Manager of the
Administration and Controls Group. This form is available at the
Water Authority server in the directory
I:\0130.00\Resources\Forms&Templates. Comments will be
reviewed, and if changes are instituted, the manual will be revised and
revisions will be distributed to manual users.
Personnel entrusted with this manual are responsible for maintaining
it in a current and update condition as revised chapters are published.
Validation The San Diego County Water Authority Engineering ESD 160 Design
Manual: Volume Two (Facility Design Guide) is hereby accepted and
approved.
_________________________________
Michael T. Stift, Director of Engineering
San Diego County Water Authority
SDCWA Design Manual TABLE OF CONTENTS
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
October 2007 iii REV 00
Table of Contents
Chapter 1 Introduction
Chapter 2 Transmission Pipelines
Chapter 3 Pump Stations
Chapter 4 Flow Control Facilities
Chapter 5 Seismic Design Criteria
Chapter 6 SCADA and Instrumentation & Control
Appendix A Supplemental Seismic Design Criteria for Water Facilities
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 1. Introduction
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
October 2007 Chapter 1 REV 00
Chapter 1 Introduction
Overview
Purpose This chapter presents an introduction to the purpose, use, and organ-
ization of the Facility Design Guide.
Topics This chapter is composed of the following topics:
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................... 1-1
1.1 FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE IS PART OF THE DESIGN MANUAL....................................................... 1-1
1.1.1 FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE IS THE SECOND VOLUME OF THE DESIGN MANUAL ........................... 1-1
1.1.2 PURPOSE OF THE FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE ........................................................................... 1-1
1.1.3 DESIGN MANAGER ............................................................................................................... 1-2
1.1.4 INCONSISTENCIES ................................................................................................................ 1-2
1.1.5 REFERENCE TO THE DESIGN CONTRACTOR GUIDE................................................................ 1-2
1.1.6 HYPERLINKS ........................................................................................................................ 1-2
1.2 USE OF THE FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE....................................................................................... 1-3
1.2.1 USE BY DESIGN CONTRACTORS ........................................................................................... 1-3
1.2.2 DEVIATIONS FROM THE FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE ................................................................... 1-3
1.3 ORGANIZATION OF THE FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE ...................................................................... 1-4
1.3.1 SIX CHAPTERS IN THE FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE ..................................................................... 1-4
1.3.2 ENGINEERING DISCIPLINES................................................................................................... 1-4
1.3.3 CHAPTER LAYOUT................................................................................................................ 1-5
FIGURE 1-1: CHAPTER LAYOUT....................................................................................................... 1-5
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 1. Introduction
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
October 2007 Chapter 1 REV 00
This page intentionally left blank
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 1. Introduction
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
October 2007 1-1 REV 00
1.1 Facility Design Guide is Part of the Design Manual
1.1.1
Facility Design
Guide is the
Second Volume
of the Design
Manual
1. The Facility Design Guide is the second volume of a two-volume
Design Manual that consists of the following:
1.1. VOLUME 1 DESIGN CONTRACTOR GUIDE: Provides de-
sign management and administrative procedures, including re-
quirements for design schedule and budget control, reporting,
QA/QC program, deliverables at different levels of design, con-
struction cost estimating, records management, and other top-
ics. The Design Contractor Guide also describes the relation-
ships between the Design Contractor and the Design Manager.
1.2. VOLUME 2 FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE: Provides design re-
quirements for different types of facilities, including pipelines,
pump stations, and flow control facilities.
1.1.2
Purpose of the
Facility Design
Guide
1. The Facility Design Guide provides general technical guidelines that
shall be followed by Design Contractors selected by the Water Au-
thority to prepare engineering reports, construction drawings, speci-
fications, and other documents for construction of the facilities nec-
essary to implement the CIP and/or to provide services during other
project phases. The design of these facilities shall be based on:
1.1. Applicable codes and standards.
1.2. The project-specific scope of work.
1.3. Criteria presented in the project Predesign or Planning Study
Report
1.4. The Water Authority Design Manual
1.5. Documents and other standard manuals referenced in the De-
sign Manual
2. The Facility Design Guide is intended to ensure uniformity of design
concepts, formats, methodologies, procedures, construction mater-
ials, types of equipment, and quality of work products produced for
the Water Authority.
3. The Design Contractor shall take full responsibility for the designs
produced. This responsibility of the Design Contractor is in no way
diluted or absolved by the Design Manual.
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 1. Introduction
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
October 2007 1-2 REV 00
1.1.3
Design Manager
1. A Design Manager will be assigned to each project and will be the
Design Contractors point of contact with the Water Authority for the
project.
2. The Design Manager will administer the Contract to ensure compli-
ance with provisions of the Contract and the Design Manual.
1.1.4
Inconsistencies
1. Inconsistencies may exist between the Design Manual, Predesign
Report, project scope of work, and other Water Authority docu-
ments. Resolution of such inconsistencies, if any, is discussed in the
Design Contractor Guide, Chapter 1, Paragraph 1.4.
1.1.5
Reference to
the Design Con-
tractor Guide
1. Refer to the Design Contractor Guide for additional information and
requirements.
1.1.6
Hyperlinks
1. The Facility Design Guide chapter tables of contents are hyper-
linked. Other references are not hyperlinked.
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 1. Introduction
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
October 2007 1-3 REV 00
1.2 Use of the Facility Design Guide
1.2.1
Use by Design
Contractors
1. The Facility Design Guide identifies general design details and ap-
proaches to be used for design of Water Authority facilities. The
Facility Design Guide is intended to promote uniformity in key de-
sign concepts and equipment types.
2. The Facility Design Guide does not limit the responsibility of the
Design Contractor, but assists in providing professionally sound, ef-
ficient, uniform, and workable facilities, including pipelines, flow
control facilities, pump stations, and other facilities. Not all aspects
of design are addressed in the Facility Design Guide, and, in all
cases, the Design Contractor must use good engineering judgment
and practices.
3. The Design Contractor shall incorporate the design criteria pre-
sented in the Facility Design Guide into the overall facility design.
Sometimes the criteria are given in ranges, in which case the final
criteria shall be selected within the indicated range. In other cases,
specific criteria have been given and shall be followed by the De-
sign Contractor. However, the Design Contractor may request
changes to the criteria presented in the Facility Design Guide to
suit the specifics of the project. Refer to Section 1.2.2 below for
more information.
4. If documents referenced in the Facility Design Guide have been
updated since the original writing of the Facility Design Guide, the
Design Contractor shall use the documents current at the time the
design is initiated. Such document use shall be referenced in writ-
ing to the Design Manager.
1.2.2
Deviations from
the Facility De-
sign Guide
1. If the Design Contractor desires to deviate from the criteria pre-
sented in the Facility Design Guide, the Design Contractor shall
propose such modifications, with justifications, to the Design Man-
ager as described in Design Manual, Volume 1 - Design Contractor
Guide.
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 1. Introduction
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
October 2007 1-4 REV 00
1.3 Organization of the Facility Design Guide
1.3.1
Six Chapters in
the Facility De-
sign Guide
1. The Facility Design Guide is presented in six chapters as follows:
1.1. Chapter 1 Introduction
Describes the purpose, use, and organization of the Facility De-
sign Guide. It also describes how the Facility Design Guide coor-
dinates with the Design Contractor Guide and other Water Au-
thority manuals and documents.
1.2. Chapter 2 Transmission Pipelines
Describes requirements for design of Water Authority transmis-
sion pipelines, including materials, methods of jointing, inline
valves and flow meters, venting and draining, instrumentation
and control and other appurtenances.
1.3. Chapter 3 Pump Stations
Describes requirements for design of Water Authority pump sta-
tions, including pump types and selection, control valves, flow
meters, buildings and other structures, instrumentation and con-
trol, and other appurtenances.
1.4. Chapter 4 Flow Control Facilities
Describes requirements for Water Authority above-ground and
below-ground flow control facilities, including flow meter types
and requirements, control valve types and requirements, build-
ings, underground vaults, instrumentation and control, and other
appurtenances.
1.5. Chapter 5 Seismic Design Criteria
Describes seismic design criteria applicable to Water Authority
pipelines, flow control facilities, pump stations, and other facili-
ties.
1.6. Chapter 6 SCADA and Instrumentation & Control
Describes SCADA and Instrumentation & Control requirements
applicable to Water Authority pipelines, flow control facilities,
pump stations, and other facilities.
1.3.2
Engineering
Disciplines
1. Where appropriate, Chapters 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 include related guide-
lines for the disciplines listed below. Other disciplines may be ad-
dressed as well.
1.1. Civil
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 1. Introduction
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
1.2. Structural
1.3. Architectural
1.4. Landscaping and irrigation
1.5. Electrical
1.6. Instrumentation and Control
1.7. SCADA (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition)
1.8. Mechanical Equipment, piping and plumbing, and HVAC
(Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning)
1.9. Hydraulics
1.10. Corrosion
1.11. Miscellaneous
1.3.3
Chapter Layout
1. Each chapter of the Facility Design Guide is composed of sections
as illustrated in Figure 1-1.
Section
Topic 3
Section
Topic 2
Section
Topic 1
Overview
Chapter
Figure 1-1: Chapter Layout
2. An overview is provided for each chapter, identifying the specific
sections within that chapter. Each section in the chapters is a major
chapter topic, and the blocks of information provided within each
section are the chapter subtopics.
October 2007 1-5 REV 00
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 2. Transmission Pipelines
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
October 2007 Chapter 2 REV 00
Chapter 2 Transmission Pipelines
Overview
Purpose This chapter presents the Water Authority general requirements for
design of pipelines and pipeline appurtenances.
Topics This chapter is composed of the following topics:
CHAPTER 2 TRANSMISSION PIPELINES................................................................................ 2-1
2.1 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................ 2-1
2.1.1 GENERAL............................................................................................................................. 2-1
2.1.2 STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES .............................................................................................. 2-1
2.2 PIPELINE ALIGNMENT.............................................................................................................. 2-4
2.2.1 HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT ..................................................................................................... 2-4
2.2.2 VERTICAL ALIGNMENT.......................................................................................................... 2-4
2.2.3 HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CURVES.................................................................................... 2-5
2.2.4 UTILITY SEPARATIONS.......................................................................................................... 2-6
2.2.5 PROPERTY REQUIREMENTS.................................................................................................. 2-6
2.3 PIPE MATERIALS, LININGS, AND COATINGS.............................................................................. 2-8
2.3.1 PIPE MATERIALS .................................................................................................................. 2-8
2.3.2 PIPE LININGS AND COATINGS ............................................................................................... 2-8
2.4 PIPE FITTINGS, JOINTING, AND SPECIAL CONNECTIONS.......................................................... 2-11
2.4.1 PIPE FITTINGS ................................................................................................................... 2-11
2.4.2 PIPE J OINTING / COUPLING................................................................................................. 2-11
2.4.3 PIPE SPECIAL CONNECTIONS ............................................................................................. 2-13
2.5 PIPELINE APPURTENANCES................................................................................................... 2-15
2.5.1 GENERAL........................................................................................................................... 2-15
2.5.2 VALVES ............................................................................................................................. 2-15
2.5.3 OTHER APPURTENANCES ................................................................................................... 2-18
2.6 PIPE TRENCH........................................................................................................................ 2-22
2.6.1 GENERAL........................................................................................................................... 2-22
2.6.2 PIPE TRENCH WIDTH.......................................................................................................... 2-22
2.6.3 PIPE TRENCH DEPTH ......................................................................................................... 2-22
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 2. Transmission Pipelines
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
October 2007 Chapter 2 REV 00
2.6.4 CONSTRUCTION ISSUES......................................................................................................2-23
2.7 PIPELINE DESIGN...................................................................................................................2-25
2.7.1 GENERAL ...........................................................................................................................2-25
2.7.2 PIPE WALL THICKNESS .......................................................................................................2-25
2.7.3 PIPE SIZE...........................................................................................................................2-29
2.7.4 TRANSIENT ANALYSIS .........................................................................................................2-29
2.7.5 THRUST RESTRAINT ...........................................................................................................2-30
2.7.6 CATHODIC PROTECTION .....................................................................................................2-31
2.7.7 PIPELINE SUPPORTS...........................................................................................................2-36
2.7.8 PIPELINE ENCASEMENT ......................................................................................................2-37
2.8 SPECIAL CROSSINGS.............................................................................................................2-38
2.8.1 GENERAL ...........................................................................................................................2-38
2.8.2 PERMANENT CROSSINGS....................................................................................................2-38
2.8.3 TEMPORARY CROSSINGS....................................................................................................2-39
2.9 TRENCHLESS CONSTRUCTION................................................................................................2-40
2.9.1 GENERAL ...........................................................................................................................2-40
2.9.2 TUNNELING ........................................................................................................................2-41
2.9.3 TUNNEL PORTAL.................................................................................................................2-43
2.10 INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL .........................................................................................2-44
2.10.1 GENERAL ...........................................................................................................................2-44
2.10.2 VALVES AND OTHER EQUIPMENT ........................................................................................2-44
Attachment 2-1: Cover Page of the Water Authority General Conditions and Standard
Specifications.................................................................................................2-46
Attachment 2-2: Cover Page of the Water Authority Standard Drawings & Standard
Details ...........................................................................................................2-47
Attachment 2-3: Cover Page of the Water Authority Cathodic Protection Guide
Drawings........................................................................................................2-48
Attachment 2-4: Cover Page of the Water Authority Electrical/Instrumentation Guide
Drawings .........................................................................................................2-49
Attachment 2-5: Cover Page of the Water Authority Drafting Manual ...................................2-50
Attachment 2-6: General Design Criteria for Pipeline Appurtenances..................................2-51
Attachment 2-7: Cover Page of San Diego Regional Standard Drawings.............................2-53
Attachment 2-8: Cover Page of the Water Authority Engineering Guidelines for Review
of Proposed Right-of-Way Encroachments .................................................2-54
Attachment 2-9: Cover page of the Water Authority PLC Implementation Standards.........2-55
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 2. Transmission Pipelines
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
October 2007 2-1 REV 00
2.1 Introduction
2.1.1
General
This chapter outlines the standards that shall be followed in the design
and construction of Water Authority pipeline projects. These standards
cover the following items:
Pipe alignment (horizontal and vertical).
Pipe materials.
Linings and coatings.
Pipe fittings (wyes, tees, etc.).
Pipe jointing.
Pipe special connections (e.g., connection to other pipes and
structures).
Thrust restraint.
Special crossings (e.g., freeways, highways, railroads, etc.)
Pipeline appurtenances including:
o Isolation and control valves, valve actuators, and
associated structures.
o Air valve assemblies and associated structures.
o Blowoff and pump well and associated structures.
Pipe hydraulic design and transient flow analysis.
Pipe installation and layout.
Pipe trench (bedding, backfill, etc.).
Trenchless pipe construction.
Pipeline assessment.
Pipeline instrumentation and control (I&C).
2.1.2
Standards and
Guidelines
In several sections of this chapter, the Design Contractor is required to
use and specify Water Authority Standard Documents including
standard specification sections and standard drawings. In all cases, the
Design Contractor shall verify the adequacy of these standard
documents to the project specifics. The Design Contractor shall review
and propose changes to the Water Authority documents, per project
needs and shall follow the procedure outlined in Chapters 1 and 14 of
the Design Contractor Guide (Design Manual Volume One; ESD-160)
in proposing and requesting changes.
It is to be noted that the Water Authority standards are usually higher
than AWWA standards, which are considered by the Water Authority as
minimum requirements. Whenever using an AWWA standard, the
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 2. Transmission Pipelines
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
October 2007 2-2 REV 00
Design Contractor shall confirm that no higher standard is required by
the Water Authority Standard Specifications and/or Drawings.
A. Water Authority Standards and Guidelines
The main Water Authority standards and guidelines for use in pipeline
design and construction include:
General Conditions and Standard Specifications (hereinafter
referred to as GC&SS). Refer to Attachment 2-1 for the
cover page of the GC&SS.
Standard Drawings & Standard Details (hereinafter referred
to as SD&SD). Refer to Attachment 2-2 for the cover page of
SD&SD.
Cathodic Protection Guide Drawings. Refer to Attachment 2-
3 for the cover page of the Cathodic Protection Guide
Drawings.
Electrical/Instrumentation Guide Drawings. Refer to
Attachment 2-4 for the cover page of the
Electrical/Instrumentation Guide Drawings.
B. National Standards and Guidelines
Several national standards and guidelines are available for use in
pipeline design and construction including:
Cal-OSHA (California Occupation Safety and Health
Administration/Act) standards, as applicable.
C200, AWWA Standard for Steel Water Pipe 6 In. (150 mm)
and Larger.
C203, AWWA Standard for Coal-Tar Protective Coatings and
Linings for Steel Water Pipelines Enamel and Tape Hot-
Applied.
C205, AWWA Standard for Cement-Mortar Protective Lining
and Coating for Steel Water Pipe 4 In. (100 mm) and Larger
Shop Applied.
C206, AWWA Standard for Field Welding of Steel Water Pipe
C207, AWWA Standard for Steel Pipe Flanges for
Waterworks Service Sizes 4 In. Through 144 In. (100 mm
through 3,600 mm).
C208, AWWA Standard for Dimensions for Fabricated Steel
Water Pipe Fittings.
C209, AWWA Standard for Cold-Applied Tape Coatings for
the Exterior of Special Sections, Connections, and Fittings for
Steel Water Pipelines.
C214, AWWA Standard for Tape Coating Systems for the
Exterior of Steel Water Pipelines.
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 2. Transmission Pipelines
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
October 2007 2-3 REV 00
C215, AWWA Standard for Extruded Polyolefin Coatings for
the Exterior of Steel Water Pipelines.
C217, AWWA Standard for Cold-Applied Petrolatum Tape
and Petroleum Wax Tape Coatings for the Exterior of Special
Sections, Connections, and Fittings for Buried or Submerged
Steel Water Pipelines.
C219, AWWA Standard for Bolted, Sleeve-Type Couplings
for Plain-End Pipe.
C221, AWWA Standard for Fabricated Steel Mechanical Slip-
Type Expansion J oints.
C224, AWWA Standard for Two Layer Nylon-11 Based
Polyamide Coating System for Interior and Exterior of Steel
Water Pipe, Connections, Fittings, and Special Sections.
C602, AWWA Standard for Cement-Mortar Lining of Water
Pipelines In Place 4 In. (100 mm) and Larger In Place.
C606, AWWA Standard for Grooved and Shouldered J oints.
ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials)
standards, as applicable.
AWWA M11, Steel PipeA Guide for Design and Installation.
AWWA M27, External CorrosionIntroduction to Chemistry
and Control.
AWWA M29, Cleaning and Lining Water Mains.
AWWA M44, Distribution Valves: Selection, Installation, Field
Testing, and Maintenance.
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Manual No. 89,
Pipeline Crossings.
ASCE Manual No. 46, Report on Pipeline Location.
American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI) Steel Plate
Engineering Data, Vol. 3, Welded Steel Pipe.
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 2. Transmission Pipelines
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
October 2007 2-4 REV 00
2.2 Pipeline Alignment
2.2.1
Horizontal
Alignment
Preliminary pipeline horizontal alignment is generally developed during
the project planning or predesign phase and is presented in the project
Planning Study or Predesign Report. If a horizontal preliminary
alignment is available, the Design Contractor shall review and
recommend the necessary changes to accommodate the development
of design. Such changes may be triggered by utility conflicts,
constructability issues, environmental issues, permitting requirements,
easement/right-of-way needs, etc. Refer to Chapters 5, 7, and 10 of
the Design Contractor Guide for more information.
The pipeline horizontal alignment may need to be chosen to:
Avoid vertical high points or to conform to other
requirements of the hydraulic transient analysis. Refer to
Section 2.7.4 for additional information.
Avoid, if possible, running parallel to sewer or reclaimed
water lines.
The Design Contractor shall submit the proposed horizontal alignment
changes to the Design Manager for approval prior to their
incorporation into the project design. If no horizontal alignment is
available, the Design Contractor shall develop one for the project.
Horizontal pipeline alignment is detailed and finalized during
subsequent design phases of the project.
Drafting of pipeline horizontal alignment drawings shall be per the
requirements stated in the Water Authority Drafting Manual (ESD-120;
refer to Attachment 2-5 for the cover page of the Manual). Elements of
the horizontal alignment shall be as indicated in Section 2.2 (Pipelines
Plans and Profiles) of ESD-120 and include:
Pipeline material and size.
Pipeline lining and coating.
Pipeline station on pipe centerline.
Pipeline horizontal curve data.
Pipeline appurtenances.
Easement limits.
2.2.2
Vertical
Alignment
The Design Contractor shall develop the pipeline vertical alignment
(profile) that minimizes construction costs while still meeting the needs
and design intent of the project. Abrupt vertical grade breaks resulting
in upward thrust shall be avoided. Whenever practical, use a depth of
one pipe diameter for large pipes and two pipe diameters for small
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 2. Transmission Pipelines
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
October 2007 2-5 REV 00
pipes. Minimum cover for pipelines is discussed in Section 2.6 of this
chapter.
Factors to be considered in vertical alignment design include:
Pipe material, fabrication, and installation costs.
Potential conflicts with existing and future utilities or other
improvements.
The safety and security of the pipeline.
Geotechnical conditions.
The requirements of governing agencies and permitting
requirements.
Construction requirements.
Maintenance requirements.
The Design Contractor shall submit the proposed vertical alignment to
the Design Manager for approval prior to their incorporation into the
project design. Vertical pipeline alignment shall be detailed and
finalized during subsequent design phases of the project.
Drafting of pipeline vertical alignment drawings shall be per the
requirements stated in the Water Authority Drafting Manual (ESD-120).
Elements of the vertical alignment shall be as indicated in Section 2.2
(Pipelines Plans and Profiles) of ESD-120 and include:
Stations and invert elevations at grade breaks with the
pipeline stationing representing the centerline of the pipe
(refer to Chapter 6 of the Design Contractor Guide for
information on selecting the appropriate datum for the
project).
Pipeline shell thickness.
Pipeline vertical curve data.
Pipeline joint type.
Lining and coating material and thickness.
2.2.3
Horizontal and
Vertical Curves
It is usually advantageous to lay out a transmission pipeline on a curve
instead of a series of straight chords. Curved alignment offers the
potential advantages of better hydraulics, reduced right-of-way
requirements, and a lower cost.
Curves for welded steel pipes are accomplished using the allowable
pipe deflection. Refer to the Steel Pipe section of the GC&SS (see
Attachment 2-1) for more discussion and limitations on pipe deflection.
In some cases beveled pipe joint special sections are used to provide
angular changes beyond the allowable deflection. Refer to the Steel
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 2. Transmission Pipelines
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
October 2007 2-6 REV 00
Pipe section in the GC&SS (see Attachment 2-1) for more discussion
and limitations on pipe beveling.
In some cases fabricated bends are used to provide the desired angular
change in the pipeline alignment. Refer to the Steel Pipe specification
section in the GC&SS (see Attachment 2-1) for more discussion and
limitations on fabricated bends.
2.2.4
Utility
Separations
Pipeline separation from sewer mains shall, as a bare minimum, adhere
to State of California Department of Health Services (CA-DHS) criteria.
The CA-DHS requires a 10-feet minimum separation (wall to wall)
between parallel sewer mains and water-conveying pipelines for most
installations. Refer to CA-DHS standards for details. Sewer mains
crossing water pipelines shall be sleeved across the right-of-way of the
pipeline. Reclaimed water mains shall be treated as sewer mains for
separation purposes.
A minimum 4-foot separation from the edge of the proposed trench
section is recommended between water-conveying pipelines and other
utilities (e.g., storm drains, gas mains, etc.).
Special construction methods and materials are necessary whenever
the minimum horizontal and vertical separations cannot be maintained.
In selecting the special construction method and design, the Design
Contractor shall consider design factors such as external forces,
impacts of groundwater, soil strength characteristics, and electrolytic
interaction between pipelines cathodic protection systems. Approval by
CA-DHS is mandatory in cases where special construction methods
and materials are required.
It is to be noted that no utilities are allowed to be located within the
pipeline trench section. In most cases, this will result in clearance
requirements considerably larger than the CA-DHS minimums.
2.2.5
Property
Requirements
Land space requirements are usually determined during the project
planning phase. During the project design phase, the Design
Contractor shall determine precisely additional land space
requirements, if needed, to safely install and maintain the pipeline.
Additional property requirements may be needed for deeper than usual
pipelines, or pipelines located in canyons, open space areas, and
other areas with difficult accessibility. All property requirements shall be
coordinated with the Water Authority Right of Way Department, as
outlined in Chapter 7 of the Design Contractor Guide (Design Manual -
Volume One; ESD-160).
Additional land space requirements may be needed to maintain the pipe
appurtenances. The Design Contractor shall include provision for
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 2. Transmission Pipelines
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
October 2007 2-7 REV 00
access roads to all pipeline appurtenances (e.g., blowoffs, air valves,
isolation and control valves, access manways, etc.).
Access roads shall have a minimum width of 20 feet, a maximum grade
of 8%, and a minimum surfacing of 4-inch decomposed granite. Access
roads with grades of 8% to 15% may be approved by the Design
Manager in special circumstances and, if approved, shall have a
minimum of 3 inches of asphaltic-concrete surfacing with proper base.
Include in the design of access roads appropriate drainage features to
control the depositing of road base material onto adjacent roads during
storm events. For additional requirements, refer to the Access Roads
specification section in the GC&SS (see Attachment 2-1).
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 2. Transmission Pipelines
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
October 2007 2-8 REV 00
2.3 Pipe Materials, Linings, and Coatings
2.3.1
Pipe Materials
An array of pipe materials is currently available in the market. The
choice of a particular pipeline material is usually a function of project
type and nature, cost (initial and maintenance), pressure requirements,
owner requirements, operation and maintenance requirements, etc.
The Design Contractor shall use and specify the materials outlined in
the specification sections in the GC&SS (see Attachment 2-1) in the
design of pipelines. The Design Contractor shall follow the procedures
outlined in Chapters 1 and 14 of the Design Contractor Guide in using
and proposing changes to the GC&SS.
Pipeline material in use by the Water Authority varies according to the
purpose of the pipe. The following are the materials used by the Water
Authority.
A. Steel Pipe
Steel pipes and fittings are used by the Water Authority in all new
transmission pipelines and sometimes used in blowoff discharge piping
and other appurtenances. The Design Contractor shall use and
reference in the Contract Documents the steel pipe specifications
outlined in the GC&SS (see Attachment 2-1). Applicable specification
sections to steel pipeline design in the GC&SS include:
Steel Pipe.
Installation of Pipe.
Disinfection of Piping.
Pressure Testing of Piping.
Piping Schedule and General Piping Requirements.
Pipe Hangers and Supports.
B. Ductile Iron (DI) Pipe
DI pipes and fittings may be used by the Water Authority in blowoff
discharge piping. The Design Contractor shall use and reference in the
Contract Documents the Ductile Iron specifications outlined in the
GC&SS (see Attachment 2-1).
2.3.2
Pipe Linings
and Coatings
A. Linings
Linings are materials applied to the pipe interior for corrosion
protection. Lining materials and requirements for pipe lining are
outlined in the GC&SS (see Attachment 2-1). Applicable specification
sections to pipe lining in the GC&SS include:
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 2. Transmission Pipelines
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
October 2007 2-9 REV 00
Steel Pipe.
Ductile Iron Pipe.
Plant-Applied Cement Mortar Lining.
Fusion-Bonded Epoxy Lining and Coating.
Field-Applied Cement Mortar Lining.
Polyurethane Lining and Coating.
The Design Contractor may propose changes to the GC&SS (see
Section 2.1 for more information on change procedure).
Large steel pipelines are normally cement-mortar lined. Large
pipelines may be polyurethane or epoxy lined if they are subjected to
frequent wet/dry cycles to avoid cracking of cement mortar lining.
Small pipelines may be polyurethane or epoxy lined, if needed, to
preserve hydraulic characteristics. Polyurethane and epoxy linings
may also be used if velocity of water in the pipeline is greater than the
maximum limit for cement-mortar lining.
B. Coatings
Coatings are materials applied to the exterior of the pipe for corrosion
protection. When selecting coating materials, the Design Contractor
shall consider:
Capability of the material to perform the desired function in a
safe and economical manner.
Material deterioration and its satisfactory operation over the
design life of the pipeline.
Capability of the selected material to withstand the
aggressive environment to which it will be exposed.
Coating materials and requirements for pipe coating are outlined in the
GC&SS (see Attachment 2-1). Applicable specification sections to pipe
coating in the GC&SS include:
Cement Mortar Coating.
Coal-Tar Coating.
Cold-Applied Plastic Tape Coating.
Fusion-Bonded Epoxy Lining and Coating.
Polyurethane Lining and Coating.
Painting and Coating.
The Design Contractor may propose changes to the GC&SS (see
Section 2.1 for information on change procedure).
Reinforced cement mortar coating for buried steel pipes shall be a
minimum of one-inch thick on top of a cold-applied tape wrap.
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 2. Transmission Pipelines
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
October 2007 2-10 REV 00
Coatings for steel surfaces exposed to the atmosphere shall be epoxy
or polyurethane.
DI pipe and fittings shall be coated per requirements outlined in Ductile
Iron specification section in the GC&SS (See Attachment 2-1).
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 2. Transmission Pipelines
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
October 2007 2-11 REV 00
2.4 Pipe Fittings, Jointing, and Special Connections
2.4.1
Pipe Fittings
Pipe fittings include all special pieces, such as wyes, elbows (5
up to
90
s
Unit saturated weight of soil backfill - lbs/ft
3
p
Incremental dynamic earth pressure due to seismic
shaking on embedded structures
System overstrength factor (ASCE 7-05, Table 12.2-1)
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 6. SCADA and Instrumentation & Control
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
October 2007 Chapter 6 REV 00
Chapter 6 SCADA and Instrumentation & Control
Overview
Purpose This chapter presents the Water Authority general requirements for
SCADA, and instrumentation and control systems.
Topics This chapter is composed of the following topics:
CHAPTER 6 SCADA AND INSTRUMENTATION & CONTROL................................................ 6-1
6.1 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................ 6-1
6.1.1 GENERAL............................................................................................................................. 6-1
6.1.2 STANDARDS, GUIDELINES, AND CODES................................................................................. 6-1
6.2 SCADA SYSTEM .................................................................................................................... 6-4
6.2.1 EXISTING SYSTEM................................................................................................................ 6-4
6.2.2 CONNECTION OF NEW FACILITIES ......................................................................................... 6-4
6.3 INSTRUMENTATION & CONTROL SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS ........................................................ 6-7
6.3.1 GENERAL............................................................................................................................. 6-7
6.3.2 PROGRAMMABLE LOGIC CONTROLLERS (PLCS).................................................................... 6-7
6.3.3 CONTROL PANEL ................................................................................................................. 6-9
6.3.4 HUMAN MACHINE INTERFACE ............................................................................................... 6-9
6.3.5 COMMUNICATIONS CABINET ............................................................................................... 6-10
6.3.6 DEVICE-LEVEL NETWORK................................................................................................... 6-10
6.3.7 FIELD INSTRUMENTATION................................................................................................... 6-11
6.3.8 SECURITY .......................................................................................................................... 6-12
6.4 EQUIPMENT CONTROL........................................................................................................... 6-15
6.4.1 CONTROL TEMPLATES........................................................................................................ 6-15
6.4.2 FLOW CONTROL FACILITIES................................................................................................ 6-16
6.4.3 PUMP STATIONS ................................................................................................................ 6-17
6.5 CONTRACT DOCUMENTS ....................................................................................................... 6-19
6.5.1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS.................................................................................................. 6-19
6.5.2 PIPING AND INSTRUMENTATION DIAGRAMS.......................................................................... 6-19
6.5.3 OTHER DOCUMENTS .......................................................................................................... 6-19
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 6. SCADA and Instrumentation & Control
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
October 2007 Chapter 6 REV 00
6.6 TESTING AND ACCEPTANCE...................................................................................................6-25
6.6.1 GENERAL ...........................................................................................................................6-25
6.6.2 FACTORY ACCEPTANCE TESTING (FAT)..............................................................................6-25
6.6.3 SITE ACCEPTANCE TESTING (SAT) .....................................................................................6-27
Attachment 6-1: Cover Page of the Water Authority General Conditions and Standard
Specifications.................................................................................................6-29
Attachment 6-2: Cover Page of the Water Authority Standard Drawings & Standard
Details .............................................................................................................6-30
Attachment 6-3: Cover Page of the Water Authority Electrical/Instrumentation Guide
Drawings .........................................................................................................6-31
Attachment 6-4: Cover Page of the Water Authority PLC Implementation Standards ........6-32
Attachment 6-5: Cover Page of the ASCE/AWWA/WEF Interim Security Guidance for
Water Utilities .................................................................................................6-33
Attachment 6-6: Cover Page of the ASCE/AWWA/WEF Guidelines for Physical Security
of Water Utilities .............................................................................................6-34
Attachment 6-7: Cover Page of the Water Authority Human Machine Interface
Standards........................................................................................................6-35
Attachment 6-8: Cover Page of the Water Authority Drafting Manual (ESD-120).................6-36
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 6. SCADA and Instrumentation & Control
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
October 2007 6-1 REV 00
6.1 Introduction
6.1.1
General
This chapter provides the Design Contractor with an overview of the
existing Water Authority Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition
(SCADA) system, and of design concepts, formats, and methodologies
to be applied in the design of Water Authority Instrumentation and
Control (I&C) systems. In addition to this chapter, the Design
Contractor shall also refer to and follow the requirements, as applicable,
outlined in Section 2.10 of Chapter 2 for Transmission Pipelines,
Section 3.7 of Chapter 3 for Pump Stations, and Section 4.6 of Chapter
4 for Flow Control Facilities.
This chapter outlines the standards and procedures that shall be
followed in the design, construction, and/or installation of SCADA and
I&C systems in Water Authority projects. These standards cover
requirements for the following items:
SCADA-system components.
Control-system components.
I&C devices.
Design documents.
Testing and acceptance.
Training.
The Design Contractor shall be responsible for:
Preparing the project I&C documents (drawings and
specifications).
Preparing the project I&C support documents such as
process control narratives.
Conducting the required programming of the project
Programmable Logic Controllers (PLCs).
Coordinating with the Water Authority Human Machine
Interface (HMI) developer and programmer.
6.1.2
Standards,
Guidelines, and
Codes
In this Guide, the Design Contractor is required to use and specify in
contract documents specific Water Authority standards, equipment,
materials, etc. In all cases, the Design Contractor shall verify the
adequacy of all referenced standards, guidelines, materials, etc. to the
project specifics. The Design Contractor shall review and modify the
Water Authority documents, as required, to suit the project specifics.
The Design Contractor shall follow the procedure outlined in Chapters 1
and 14 of the Design Contractor Guide (Design Manual Volume One;
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 6. SCADA and Instrumentation & Control
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
October 2007 6-2 REV 00
ESD-160) in proposing and requesting changes to Water Authority
Documents.
A. Water Authority Standards and Guidelines
In addition to this Guide, the other Water Authority Standards and
Guidelines for use in SCADA and I&C systems design and construction
include:
General Conditions and Standard Specifications (hereinafter
referred to as GC&SS). Refer to Attachment 6-1 for the
cover page of the GC&SS.
Standard Drawings & Standard Details (hereinafter referred
to as SD&SD). Refer to Attachment 6-2 for the cover page of
SD&SD.
Electrical/Instrumentation Guide Drawings (hereinafter
referred to as EI- GD). Refer to Attachment 6-3 for the cover
page of the Electrical/Instrumentation Guide Drawings.
PLC Implementation Standard. Refer to Attachment 6-4 for
the cover page of the PLC Implementation Standard.
B. National Standards and Codes
Numerous industry-wide codes and standards are used in I&C systems
design and construction including:
IEEE 100 - Dictionary of Electrical and Electronic Terms.
IEEE 802.3 - Ethernet Standards.
IEEE 802.11 - Wireless Communication Standards.
IEEE 802.16 - Broadband Wireless Communication
Standards.
IEC 61131 Programmable Controller Languages.
ANSI/IEEE C37.90.1 - Transient Specification (Standard for
Surge Withstand Capability).
ISA S5.1 - Instrumentation Symbols and Identification.
ISA S5.3 - Graphic Symbols for Distributed Control/Shared
Display Instrumentation, Logic and Computer Systems.
ISA S5.4 - Instrument Loop Diagrams.
ISA RP7.3 - Quality Standard for Instrument Air.
ISA S18.1 - Annunciator Sequences and Specifications.
ISA S20 - Specification Forms for Process Measurement and
Control Instruments, Primary Element and Control Valves.
ISA S51.1 - Process Instrumentation Terminology.
ISO 11898 - Controller Area Network.
NEMA 250 - Enclosures for Electrical Equipment.
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 6. SCADA and Instrumentation & Control
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
October 2007 6-3 REV 00
NEMA ICS - Enclosures for Industrial Control and Systems.
NFPA 70 - National Electrical Code (NEC).
NFPA 72 - National Fire Alarm Code.
NIST National Institute of Standards and Technology.
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 6. SCADA and Instrumentation & Control
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
October 2007 6-4 REV 00
6.2 SCADA System
6.2.1
Existing System
SCADA systems include control and monitoring hardware and
software, instrumentation, equipment and devices, communication
networks, and other periphery control elements. The existing Water
Authority SCADA system is comprised of the following components:
A PC-based system for control, monitoring, and archiving
that runs on a number of software programs including
Wonderware Industrial Application Server, Wonderware
Intouch, Wonderware ActiveFactory, and others.
Computer servers for network administration and storage of
historical records.
Routers and switches for communication and data
transmission.
MDS (Microwave Data Systems) for wireless communication
with remote facilities.
Leased telephone circuits, including T-1 WAN (Wide Area
Network) links, for communication with remote facilities.
An Ethernet-based communication network.
A single-mode fiber optic cable system.
The central control room of the existing SCADA system is currently
located at the Water Authority Escondido office and is known as the
Escondido Control Center (ECC). Refer to the EI-GD (see Attachment
6-3) for more information on communication links between new
facilities and the ECC. See Attachment 6-1 for the cover page of the
Electrical/Instrumentation Guide Drawings. A study is underway to
determine the feasibility of moving the ECC to a new location. The
ECC will continue to operate until a planned new control center is
completed.
6.2.2
Connection of
New Facilities
As the Water Authority expands its services through implementation of
new projects, additional Programmable Logic Controllers (PLCs) will
have to be installed to interface with the existing SCADA system. Refer
to Section 6.3.2 for more information on PLCs. Ethernet is the standard
network connecting the ECC with remote facilities. ControlNet is used
as the communication protocol between the ECC and the PLCs located
at Water Authority facilities.
Depending on project location, surrounding topography, and nearby
existing Water Authority communication facilities, one of the following
options may be used to tie new facilities into the Water Authority
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 6. SCADA and Instrumentation & Control
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
October 2007 6-5 REV 00
SCADA system. The options are listed according to the preferred mode
of communication:
The new facility is located nearby the Water Authority fiber
optic communication network. In this case, connect the new
facility to the nearest fiber optic pullbox. Refer to the Fiber
Optic Communication Link Control System Block Diagram
drawing in the EI-GD (see Attachment 6-3) for more
information.
The new facility is located nearby a Water Authoritys wireless
microwave repeater. In this case, connect the new facility to
the nearby microwave repeater using fiber optic cables.
Refer to the Fiber Optic Communication Link Control System
Block Diagram drawing in the EI-GD (see Attachment 6-3)
for more information.
The new facility is not located nearby the Water Authoritys
fiber optic network nor nearby a wireless microwave repeater.
However, it has a clear path to one of the Water Authoritys
wireless microwave repeaters or to a Water Authority facility
communicating with the SCADA system. In this case,
connect the new facility to the nearest microwave repeater, or
to the facility communicating with the SCADA system, via
wireless microwave radio communication with spread
spectrum 5.8 GHz MDS (Microwave Data System). Radio
communication via 900 MHz MDS may be allowed if no video
transmission is required. Refer to the Microwave Radio
Communication Link Control System Block Diagram drawing
in the EI-GD (see Attachment 6-3) for more information.
When using wireless communication, distance limitations of
the carrying signals should be considered.
The new facility is not located nearby the Water Authoritys
fiber optic network or a wireless microwave repeater, and
does not have a direct path (i.e., the signal is blocked by
buildings or by natural terrain) to one of the Water Authoritys
wireless microwave repeaters nor to a facility communicating
with the SCADA system. In this case, connect the new
facility to the SCADA system via a leased telephone line.
Refer to the Telco Frame Relay Communication Link Control
System Block Diagram drawing in the EI-GD (see
Attachment 6-3) for more information.
All wireless-transmitted data shall be secured and carried over the
Water Authoritys Aqueduct Control System (ACS) network, which is a
private network with designated Ethernet IP addresses. The network IP
address for each project is assigned by the Water Authority Operations
and Maintenance (O&M) Department.
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 6. SCADA and Instrumentation & Control
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
October 2007 6-6 REV 00
No transmission shall be allowed over the internet. All wireless
communication shall be designed and effected using the IEEE 802.11
and IEEE 802.16 standards. Algorithms such as WEP (Wired
Equivalent Privacy) that are known to be prone to eavesdropping or
unauthorized access shall not be used.
Data transmission between new facilities and the ECC shall be for the
following types of data and priority shall be in the order indicated:
I&C signals for control and monitoring.
Site access control system (see Section 6.3.7 for additional
information).
Video surveillance (see Section 6.3.7 for additional
information).
Other types of data, as required.
In addition to the above requirements, some major or critical facilities
may require voice communication, via telephone lines, to accommodate
communication to the ECC, other facilities, and field personnel.
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 6. SCADA and Instrumentation & Control
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
October 2007 6-7 REV 00
6.3 Instrumentation & Control System Requirements
6.3.1
General
The I&C system requirements and selected components for a new
facility are a function of the type of facility (e.g., pump station, flow
control facility), and the size of the facility. The I&C system may vary
from a single control panel with a PLC that controls and monitors facility
equipment and instruments, to a complete control room equipped with
computer workstations, PLC cabinets, and linking devices. Either type
of facility would have a communications cabinet housing equipment with
the capability to communicate with the ECC via an established
communications network.
The Design Contractor shall advise the Water Authority on the most
appropriate I&C system configuration for the new facility. The Design
Contractor shall fully coordinate the I&C system design with the Water
Authority O&M Department. Within 45 calendar days from Notice to
Proceed (NTP), the Design Contractor shall deliver a presentation to
O&M staff covering the control philosophy for the new project, including
expected level of automation and the proposed control system
configuration for the new facility.
6.3.2
Programmable
Logic
Controllers
(PLCs)
A. General
Water Authority facilities are equipped with Allen Bradley PLCs for
control, monitoring, and data communication. PLCs shall have the
following minimum requirements:
Equipped with redundant power supply.
Based on failure assessment, may be equipped with
redundant processors.
Equipped with ports enabling interfacing with the facility
communications cabinet (see Section 6.3.5).
Equipped with interface devices to communicate with all
facility networks.
PLCs shall be designed to accommodate all known immediate loads.
The PLC power supply, number of input/output (I/O) points, wiring
terminals, and other components shall have a minimum of 25% active
spare capacity. Memory size shall have a minimum of 50% spare
capacity. Important facilities shall be provided with redundant PLCs.
The Design Contractor shall advice the Water Authority whether
redundant PLCs are needed.
The Design Contractor shall refer to the following documents for more
information on PLCs:
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 6. SCADA and Instrumentation & Control
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
October 2007 6-8 REV 00
Programmable Logic Controller specification section in the
GC&SS (refer to Attachment 6-1).
PLC Implementation Standard (refer to Attachment 6-4).
There are three PLC configurations that the WA generally use based
on the needs of the facility:
CompactLogix PLC for small facilities (e.g., a standard flow
control facility; FCF).
ControLogix PLC deployed in a redundant configuration for
large facilities (e.g., pump station).
Single ControlLogix PLC for facilities which are more
complicated than an FCF but less complicated than a pump
station.
The type of PLC used is a function of the number of I/Os, memory
needs, and consequence of failure.
B. Programming
To simplify deployment, and to provide redundancy for safety reasons,
facility PLCs shall be capable of executing programs autonomously
without involving the host computers of the SCADA system. The
Design Contractor shall be responsible for programming facility PLCs.
The control logic programmed into the PLC shall conform to the
operating descriptions (process control narratives), and P&ID drawings
developed by the Design Contractor (refer to section 6.5 for more
information).
The Design Contractor shall use the IEC 61131 functional block or
ladder programming language for creating programs to run on PLCs.
The Design Contractor shall use the following documents while
performing programming for the PLCs:
Programming Software for Programmable Logic Controllers
) specification section in the GC&SS (refer to Attachment 6-
1).
PLC Implementation Standard (refer to Attachment 6-4).
In programming the PLCs, the Design Contractor shall abide by the
requirements stipulated in the above-mentioned documents including
providing the required software and conducting the necessary training.
C. Safety Features
PLCs shall have the logic to execute the necessary actions when
physical override switches on the PLC cabinet toggled ON during
maintenance operations. This is done to ensure operator safety by
avoiding automatic control of equipment and processes while
maintenance functions are underway, i.e., system operators at the ECC
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 6. SCADA and Instrumentation & Control
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
October 2007 6-9 REV 00
shall not have control capability of the facility when maintenance
functions are being carried out.
6.3.3
Control Panel
The control panel, where the PLC usually resides, shall have an on-line
120 VAC uninterruptible power supply (UPS) unit with battery backup,
sized to power the PLC modules and other devices within the panel for
a minimum of 2 hours after a power failure. All facility field instrument
and control wiring that is routed to the control panel will terminate at the
control panel terminal block prior to connecting to the PLC or other
control panel device. Refer to the following Water Authority documents
for additional requirements on control panels:
The EI-GD (refer to Attachment 6-3) including the following
drawings:
o Control Panel Terminal Block Rail Assembly
Drawings.
o Control Panel & PLC Wiring Diagrams.
o Control Panel Elevations and Miscellaneous Details.
The GC&SS (refer to Attachment 6-1) including the following
specification sections:
o Uninterruptible Power Supply.
o Cabinets and Consoles
The PLC Implementation Standard (refer to Attachment 6-4)
including the following section:
o PLC Drawing Formats.
The Design Contractor shall size control panels to effectively house all
components, devices, and peripherals needed for immediate and future
service requirements. The Design Contractor shall determine the need
for future growth, and plan additional space in the control panel
accordingly. A minimum 25% spare capacity applies to future growth
capacity. All control panels designed to accommodate future
expansion shall have blank plates to cover cutouts. Wireways in the
control panel shall be designed to have no greater than 50% fill, in any
portion, when fully wired.
6.3.4
Human Machine
Interface
PLCs shall have an HMI (operator interface) for local process
monitoring and control. The HMI may vary from a small monitor
attached to the control panel (Panel View) to a fully equipped control
room with consoles, computers (workstations), printers, display
monitors, and other equipment.
The HMI will display process graphics especially configured for the
facility and an alarm window showing the most recent alarms including
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 6. SCADA and Instrumentation & Control
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
October 2007 6-10 REV 00
an alarm summary page. The HMI displays will be designed and
configured by the Water Authority. However, the Design Contractor
shall specify all required equipment (computers, etc.) and power and
control communication devices required for proper implementation of
the HMI system.
The Design Contractor shall specify other types of HMIs, such as
interface panels mounted on pieces of equipment, as required.
Training on the use of these interface panels shall be provided by the
Construction Contractor.
6.3.5
Communications
Cabinet
In addition to control panels (see Section 6.3.3), new facilities shall be
equipped with communications cabinets. The main purpose of the
communications cabinet is to house the communications devices that
interface signals transmitted and received between the ECC and the
facility PLC, card access control cabinet, and surveillance equipment
(see Section 6.3.8). Several essential communication devices are
included in the communications cabinet including:
Routers for communication with microwave radio transceiver,
leased telephone line modems, or fiber optic switch
transceiver, as applicable.
Fiber optic cable termination cabinet, if used.
Radios for wireless communication, if used.
UPS power supply.
A 10 Mbps RJ -45 Ethernet port through which a laptop
computer can gain access and interface with the control
system.
The Design Contractor shall refer to the EI-GD (see Attachment 6-3),
and to the Cabinets and Consoles specification section in the GC&SS
(see Attachment 6-1) for the different types of communications cabinets
and other related requirements.
6.3.6
Device-Level
Network
For more complicated facilities, the Water Authority has started to shift
from the traditional analog (4-20 mA) type of control for field equipment
and devices to a digital-type system. The Water Authority adopted
Foundation-Fieldbus as the device-level network of choice for some
projects. Other types of field buses (e.g., DeviceNet) may be proposed
by the Design Contractor. Depending on the nature of the project and
the complexity and number of instruments and devices, a decision is
made by the Water Authority whether to use the traditional 4-20 mA for
control and monitoring or to switch to a digital-type system or
combination of digital and analog systems.
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 6. SCADA and Instrumentation & Control
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
October 2007 6-11 REV 00
If the type of device-level control is not already stated in the project
predesign report, the Design contractor shall hold a meeting at the
inception of the project with the O&M Department to discuss control
options (digital fieldbus vs. traditional 4-20 mA) for the device-level
network.
Specific to the digital-type fieldbus network, the Design Contractor
shall:
Specify field equipment and devices that are certified
compatible with the selected digital fieldbus network.
Specify in the contract documents that equipment
manufacturers shall provide track records of similar
installations.
Specify the necessary digital fieldbus network components.
Prepare the block diagram for the digital fieldbus network
showing the network components and configuration.
Prepare initial wiring diagrams for the digital fieldbus network
to be finalized by the Construction Contractor.
Specify the necessary communication modules / linking
devices between the PLCs and the digital fieldbus network.
The Design Contractor shall also specify in the contract cocuments the
following requirements to be carried by the Construction Contractor:
Provide licenses to all software used in setting up the
network or individual instruments. Requirements shall be
similar to those stipulated in Field-Mounted Instruments
specification section in the GC&SS (see Attachment 6-1).
Provide a copy of the DD (Device Description) and the EDS
(Electronic Data Sheet) files used in the setup of the device-
level network.
Provide the necessary training to O&M staff. See Section
6.5.4 below for training requirements.
Furnish the Water Authority with the latest version of each of
the following tools (single station license)
o Conformance Test Kit (verifies communication
behavior of a device).
o Interoperability Test Kit (verifies functionality of a
device).
6.3.7
Field
Instrumentation
All field instruments shall be of the latest proven industrial quality
design and manufacturing. Each instrument shall have a history of
successful use in its specified application. If the failure of any single
field instrument could jeopardize the continuous operation of the
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 6. SCADA and Instrumentation & Control
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
October 2007 6-12 REV 00
process, redundant instruments shall be provided for a fault-tolerant
configuration. The Design Contractor shall use and specify the Field-
Mounted Instruments specification section in the GC&SS (see
Attachment 6-1).
If a digital fieldbus device-level network is used, then instruments shall
be certified compatible to the selected fieldbus (refer to Section 6.3.5
for additional requirements). If a digital fieldbus network is not used,
then instruments shall be of an intelligent version capable of
communicating with the latest version of HART (Highway Addressable
Remote Transducer) protocol (currently HART 375). Refer to the
Field-Mounted Instruments specification section in the GC&SS (see
Attachment 6-1) for more information on HART communication
requirements for instruments.
It is to be noted that the Field-Mounted Instruments specification
section does not cover all instruments. The Design Contractor shall
develop specifications for all other types of instruments needed for the
project with requirements similar to those outlined in the Field-Mounted
Instruments specification section, including requirements for spare
parts, training, warranty, etc.
6.3.8
Security
The Design Contractor shall use the following guidelines, developed by
ASCE/AWWA/WEF, in the design of the control system:
Interim Voluntary Security Guidance for Water Utilities. Refer
to Attachment 6-5 for the cover page of this guidance. The
Design Contractor shall refer to the following sections in this
guidance and provide a list, for the Design Managers
approval, of all applicable security elements that could be
included in the design:
o Applicable paragraphs of the Cyber Security
Management, Operations, and Design Considerations
section.
Guidelines for the Physical Security of Water Utilities. Refer
to Attachment 6-6 for the cover page of these guidelines.
Depending on the type of facility, the Design Contractor shall
refer to the project-pertinent sections in these guidelines and
provide a list, for the Design Managers approval, of all
applicable I&C security elements that could be included in
the design. Applicable sections include:
o Table - Security Measures for Raw Water Facilities.
o Table - Security Measures for Wells and Pumping
Stations.
o Table - Security Measures for Distribution Systems.
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 6. SCADA and Instrumentation & Control
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
October 2007 6-13 REV 00
o Table - Security Measures for Water System Support
Facilities.
o Appendix A - Physical Security Elements.
The following are other elements of the security system that the Design
Contractor shall consider:
A. Access Control System
The facility access-control system is mainly comprised of a
programmable card-swipe terminal with keypad that is installed at the
facility entrance. It is designed to grant, monitor, and log access of
operator entrance to and exit from the facility and prevent unauthorized
entrance. The card-swipe terminal shall be hardwired to what is known
as the cardkey access control panel (CACP).
The card reader shall be located on the inside face of the facility wall,
adjacent to the entry doorway, and shall be capable of reading an
access card key through the wall. A Water Authority logo shall be
painted on the exterior side of the wall (opposite the card reader)
identifying where personnel are to place their access card keys to be
read by the sensor, and thereby unlocking the door to access the
facility.
Signal from the card reader is sent to the CACP whereby access is
either granted or denied based on pre-programmed parameters. The
CACP communication wiring shall be routed to the facility
communications cabinet and connected to the communication service
router. Access control signals are transmitted over separate network
channels from the SCADA data, and are accessible through the
security access system workstation located at the ECC.
For more information on cardkey access system, refer to:
The Access Control and Intrusion Alarm System
specification section in the GC&SS (see Attachment 6-1).
The following drawings in the EI-GD (see Attachment 6-3):
o Process and Instrumentation Diagram.
o Fiber Optic Communication Link Control System Block
Diagram.
o Microwave Radio Communication Link Control System
Block Diagram.
o Telco Frame Relay Communication Link Control
System Block Diagram.
B. Intrusion Switches
Intrusion switches are installed at possible entrance points (e.g., doors,
access hatches) within the facility. Intrusion switches are hardwired to
the facility PLC whereby their signal is sent, with the other I&C signals,
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 6. SCADA and Instrumentation & Control
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
October 2007 6-14 REV 00
to the ECC. For more information on intrusion switches, refer to the
Access Control and Intrusion Alarm System specification section in
the GC&SS (see Attachment 6-1), and to the EI-GD (see Attachment 6-
3).
C. Video Surveillance
In some projects, video cameras or other surveillance equipment may
be required. A separate security specialist shall design the site-specific
surveillance configuration, specify surveillance cameras, processing
equipment, wiring types, enclosures, and associated equipment.
The Design Contractor shall coordinate with the Water Authority
security representative to determine need, number, and location of
video cameras and associated equipment. The Design Contractor shall
also obtain information from the security representative on power and
control requirements for video cameras and processing equipment.
Appropriate conduits/conductors for power and signal wiring shall be
included in the design to accommodate for proper functioning of video
cameras and signal transfer and communication with the main security
management system located at the ECC.
Surveillance equipment communication wiring shall be routed to the
facility communications cabinet and connected to the communication
service router. Surveillance signals are transmitted to the ECC over
separate network channels from SCADA data. Refer to the
communication link control system block diagrams in the EI-GD (see
Attachment 6-3) for more information.
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 6. SCADA and Instrumentation & Control
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
October 2007 6-15 REV 00
6.4 Equipment Control
6.4.1
Control
Templates
The Design Contractor shall consult the PLC Implementation Standards
document (see Attachment 6-3) for specific equipment/device control
requirements. The PLC Implementation Standards document contains
the following standard control templates:
Analog Input: Scales analog inputs into engineering units and
uses the scaled value to generate alarms.
Analog Output: Scales analog outputs from engineering units
to raw units.
Diagnostics: Provides status monitoring functions for the
PLC.
Setpoint Control (PID control): Maintains an operator entered
setpoint (for flow, pressure, etc.) by comparing the setpoint
with the process variable (PV) value, and adjusting the output
value (controlled variable; CV) through manipulation of the
Final Control Element (FCE).
Discrete Signal Override: Forces a discrete signal to a
particular state.
Equipment Runtime: Accumulates equipment run times
based on the equipment ON signal.
Totalizer: Totalizes an analog value based on the analog
signal.
Flow Control Facility: Monitors the general conditions of the
FCF and provides signals of abnormal conditions.
Service Connection (subcomponent of a Flow Control
Facility): Controls and monitors a service connection.
Motor Control Single Speed: Controls and monitors single
speed motors.
Motor Control Variable Speed: Controls and monitors
variable speed motors.
Valve Control Single Ended: Describes the control
functions for an open/close valve.
Valve Control Double Ended: Describes the control
functions for an open/close/stop valve.
Valve Control Modulating with Actuators: Describes the
control functions for a modulating valve fitted with an
actuator.
Valve Control Modulating with Positioners: Describes the
control functions for a modulating valve fitted with a
positioner and an analog position feedback.
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 6. SCADA and Instrumentation & Control
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
October 2007 6-16 REV 00
The Design Contractor shall modify the standard control templates, if
necessary, to suit the project specifics. Any modification shall be
approved by the Design Manager. All other types of required control
that are not included in the Water Authority control templates shall be
developed by the Design Contractor.
6.4.2
Flow Control
Facilities
A. Control Modes
In Flow Control Facilities (refer to Chapter 4), flow is generally
controlled by a modulating control valve in conjunction with a
flowmeter. The modulating control valve adjusts position, whereas the
flowmeter measures flow and provides a feedback signal to the flowrate
controller. Usually the operator feeds the control system with the
desired controlling parameter setpoint. The control system will then
modulate the control valve to achieve the desired setpoint. The Design
Contractor shall design the control system with enough flexibility to
enable control using any of the following possible control modes:
Flow The system operator inputs the flow setpoint. The
control valve, in combination with the flowmeter as a
feedback to the control loop, adjusts position to provide the
desired flow.
Downstream Pressure The system operator inputs the
downstream pressure setpoint. The control valve, in
combination with the downstream pressure gauge as a
feedback to the control loop, adjusts position to provide the
desired setpoint.
Upstream Pressure The system operator inputs the
upstream pressure setpoint. The control valve, in
combination with the upstream pressure gauge as a
feedback to the control loop, adjusts position to provide the
desired setpoint.
Valve Position The system operator inputs the valve
position setpoint. The control valve, in combination with the
valve position as a feedback to the control loop, opens or
closes to maintain the desired position.
Manual The operator in the field manually opens or closes
the valve.
B. Control Configuration
The Design Contractor shall use the Setpoint Control template
referenced in Section 6.4.1 in configuring the control system for flow
control facilities. The Design Contractor shall set the proportional gain
and integral time parameters of the PID controller so that large control
valve movements are completely avoided. Derivative control is usually
not recommended in flow/pressure control loops.
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 6. SCADA and Instrumentation & Control
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
October 2007 6-17 REV 00
Special valve actuator gearing may be required to control the closing
and opening times of the flow control valve to avoid sharp changes in
flow. The Design Contractor shall be responsible for tuning the flow
control loop. The PID controller shall be tuned so that a control mode
such as the quarter wave decay or the critically damped decay may be
implemented.
6.4.3
Pump Stations
A. Control Modes
Pump systems in use by the Water Authority are normally controlled by
a flowrate- setpoint control system, which is normally maintained using
variable flow output pumping units (i.e., equipped with variable speed
drives). Refer to Section 3.6.2 of Chapter 3 (Pump Stations) for more
information on variable speed drives. Pump control through flow
control valves shall not be allowed.
The Design Contractor shall develop the control strategy based on the
number of pumps, the flow capacity of each pump, the pump(s)
characteristic curve(s), the system head curve(s), and the results of the
transient analysis (refer to Section 3.4.5 of Chapter 3, Pump Stations,
for more information). The Design Contractor shall determine the pump
speed range (minimum and maximum speed) for controlling each pump
by examining the pump efficiency curves versus the pump flow curves
at various speeds. The minimum and maximum speeds shall be as
follows:
Absolute minimum speed - Usually recommended by the
variable speed drive manufacturer.
Minimum speed - Used when more than one pump is
running. It is usually higher than the absolute minimum
speed. The Design Contractor shall determine the minimum
speed that provides smooth control of pumps and avoids
excessive start/stop cycles.
Absolute maximum speed - Usually recommended by the
variable speed drive manufacturer.
Maximum speed - Used when less than all pumps are
running. It is usually lower than the absolute maximum
speed. The Design Contractor shall determine the maximum
speed that provides smooth control of pumps and avoids
excessive start/stop cycles.
The pump speed shall vary depending on the difference between the
actual flowrate, as measured by a flowmeter downstream of the pump
station, and the flowrate setpoint. The control system shall allow for
manual and automatic rotation between lead and lag pumps to avoid
overworking the lead pump.
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 6. SCADA and Instrumentation & Control
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
October 2007 6-18 REV 00
B. Control Configuration
The Design Contractor shall use the Setpoint Control template
referenced in Section 6.4.1 in configuring the control system for the
pump station. The Design Contractor shall set the proportional gain
and integral time parameters of the PID controller so that large flow
upsets are completely avoided. Derivative control is usually not
recommended in flow/pressure control loops. The Design Contractor
shall be responsible for tuning the flow control loop. The PID controller
shall be tuned so that a control mode such as the quarter wave decay
or the critically damped decay may be implemented.
Usually the control system is configured so that the PID controller is
disengaged when starting a new pump (lag pump) following the first
one (lead pump). This causes the running pump(s) to maintain their
maximum speed. Following ramping the speed up of the new pump,
and after a specified period of time, the PID controller is re-engaged to
start commanding all running pumps. To shut down a pump, follow the
same steps in reverse disengage the PID, ramp down one pump, turn
it off, reengage the PID.
C. Other types of Control
Flowrate control of pumps may be achieved with different
methodologies other than the one discussed above in paragraphs A
and B. The Design Contractor may propose a different methodology,
as appropriate, to suit the project specifics and to meet the equipment
manufacturer needs and recommendations.
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 6. SCADA and Instrumentation & Control
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
October 2007 6-19 REV 00
6.5 Contract Documents
6.5.1
General
Requirements
The Design Contractor shall develop contract documents that promote
commonality of hardware, the use of proven and established hardware
and software products, and the use of current technology that is
compatible with hardware and software products.
Industrial grade instrumentation and control devices shall be specified.
Design shall emphasize safety, process control, reliability,
maintainability and economics. The Design Contractor shall use and
specify the Water Authority documents referenced in Section 6.1.1, as
applicable.
Contract documents shall follow the standards outlined in Chapter 14
(Technical Specifications, Drawings and Calculations) of the Design
Contractor Guide (ESD-160; Volume One), and shall reflect industry
standard practices that promote consistency, clarity, and informative
illustrations.
6.5.2
Piping and
Instrumentation
Diagrams
Piping and Instrumentation Diagrams (P&IDs) shall show (refer to the
EI-GD - see Attachment 6-3 - for an example):
Field instruments, equipment and devices including their
control panels.
Major piping including diameter.
All output signal and input signals.
PLC and its sub-components.
Communication devices and cabinets.
Monitoring and control capability at the ECC.
Loop numbering, and tagging and naming conventions for facilities,
equipment, instruments, and other devices shall follow the standards
and guidelines outlined in the following Water Authority documents:
EI-GD (refer to Attachment 6-3).
PLC Implementation Standards (refer to Attachment 6-4).
6.5.3
Other
Documents
In addition to P&IDs, the Design Contractor shall also prepare the
following documents for a complete Instrumentation and Control (I&C)
design:
A. Input and Output Summary Lists
The Design Contractor shall compile lists of all input/output (I/O) points
required for the I&C system. Several lists, one for each type of I/O,
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 6. SCADA and Instrumentation & Control
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
October 2007 6-20 REV 00
shall be prepared for each PLC. The number and type of I/O lists are a
function of the project specifics. The following are examples of I/O lists:
Digital Input (DI) to the PLC Input from an
equipment/instrument or from a digital device-level network
(e.g., Foundation Fieldbus) representing a real digital input
(e.g., on/off equipment status, alarms, etc.).
Digitized Digital Input (DDI) to the PLC Input from a digital
device-level network (e.g., Foundation Fieldbus) representing
a digitized analog input (e.g., pressure reading, valve position
reading, valve open limit switch).
Analog Input (AI) to the PLC Input directly from an
equipment/instrument representing an analog input (e.g.,
pressure reading, valve position reading, valve open limit
switch, current, voltage).
Digital Output (DO) from the PLC Output initiated from the
local HMI station or the remote ECC to the PLC, or directly
from the PLC as a result of programmed logic. Examples of
DOs include signals for turning equipment on and off, and
signals to open and close valves.
Analog Output (AO) from the PLC Output initiated from the
local HMI station or the remote ECC to the PLC, or directly
from the PLC as a result of programmed logic. Examples of
AOs include specifying rate of flow for a flowrate controller,
and specifying the valve open position.
The I/O lists shall be tabulated and include a Remarks column to
present clarifications as needed (e.g., future point requirement). Each
I/O summary list shall be organized by PLC name/number and shall
include the following information:
Tag number of I/O point.
Loop number of I/O point.
Register number.
Process description of I/O point.
P&ID drawing number on which the I/O point is included.
I/O type (DI, DDI, AI, DO, or AO).
Associated control panel number (PLC).
Total number of I/O points
B. Equipment and Instrument Summary Tables
The Design Contractor shall compile separate tables for each type of
equipment and all instruments required for the project. Instruments that
are provided by the Construction Contractor, as part of a packaged
system from a single manufacturer, may not be included in the
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 6. SCADA and Instrumentation & Control
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
October 2007 6-21 REV 00
summary tables. The information in the summary tables shall include
the following:
Type (e.g., flowmeter, pressure gauge, etc.).
Tag name and loop number.
Specification section number.
Applicable installation detail.
Associated panel name/number.
Associated I/O list.
P&ID drawing number.
Installation detail drawing number.
Process description.
Instrument range and calibrated span.
Instrument setpoints, trip points, etc.
A remarks column indicating items such as NEMA enclosure
rating, if used, specific material requirements, and all other
data needed to precisely define the instrument requirements
Tally for each type of equipment or instrument; a number
index that starts from one (1) and increases sequentially
C. List of Alarms
Out-of-range or abnormal conditions shall be annunciated by alarms.
The Design Contractor shall prepare a list of all alarm conditions with
priorities according to alarm severity. Five priority classes are generally
used. Refer to the Water Authority HMI Standards for more
information. See Attachment 6-7 for the cover page of these
Standards. The Design Contractor shall also develop a list of alarms
that require an autodialer for immediate reporting to third parties. Close
coordination with the Water Authority Operations and Maintenance
Department is required for determination of need of autodialers.
D. Equipment and Instrument Specifications
The Design Contractor shall prepare equipment and instrument
specifications for each type of field and panel-mounted piece of
equipment or instrument. The Design Contractor shall coordinate the
specifications with applicable sections of the Water Authority Standard
Specifications.
The Design Contractor shall require the Construction Contractor to
prepare and submit a data sheet conforming to ISA S20 for each piece
of equipment used.
E. Control Strategies
The Design Contractor shall develop the control strategies (control
descriptions) for each control loop. Control descriptions shall include:
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 6. SCADA and Instrumentation & Control
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
October 2007 6-22 REV 00
A list all applicable inputs and outputs.
A general description of the control strategy.
Description of the type of controller (feedforward, feedback,
cascade, etc.) and the controller parameters (i.e., PID).
Description of the control sequence, including safety
interlocks and control resets.
Description of how each element in the control loop
functions.
Description of monitoring, alarm, interlock, and control
functions for both local and remote control.
Description, in detail, of the sequence of operations required
to start or stop a device under normal and abnormal
conditions.
Quantification of all process trip points, set points and timers.
Description of what happens under abnormal conditions such
as an I&C system failure, transmitter failure, abnormal
process values, and loss of communication between PLCs.
Description of shutdown sequence under normal, equipment
malfunction and emergency shutdown modes.
Control strategies shall be annotated using the instrument and
equipment tag numbers shown on the P&IDs and reference the
relevant P&ID drawing.
F. Block Diagrams
The Design Contractor shall provide the necessary communication
block diagrams showing all components for communication between
the ECC, facility PLCs, and device-level network(s). The block
diagrams shall:
Indicate conductor types (fiber optic, coaxial, etc.).
Include items such as fiber optic modems, wiring interface
cabinets (WIC), patch panels, switches, routers, etc.
Indicate the physical location of every communication
component shown on the diagrams.
Include any HMI equipment such as workstations.
The Design Contractor shall also provide block diagrams for any digital
device-level network (e.g., Foundation Fieldbus), if used, showing the
location of the network components such as wiring cabinets, etc.
G. Control Panels and Cabinets (Enclosures)
The Design Contractor shall provide layout drawings for major
enclosures such as control panels, consoles, and cabinets, all of which
house electrical and instrumentation components and devices. Panels
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 6. SCADA and Instrumentation & Control
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
October 2007 6-23 REV 00
and consoles shall be differentiated from cabinets in that they will have
externally mounted control switches, indicator lights, digital readouts or
displays. Components and devices within these enclosures shall be
shown with their physical locations. The Water Authority standard
rating for enclosures is NEMA-12; however, the standard rating
requirement may be modified subject to the environment in which it is
installed. Refer to the EI-GD (see Attachment 6-3) and Cabinets and
Consoles specification section of the GC&SS (see Attachment 6-1) for
additional information.
H. Electrical and Instrumentation Drawings and Wiring
Diagrams
The Design Contractor shall prepare electrical and instrumentation
drawings showing each field instrument with electrical connections from
the power source to the instrument. Particular care shall be taken to
ensure that adequate space is reserved for instrument panels and
cabinets. The Design Contractor shall also show electrical signal
cables and raceways on the electrical drawings. Prepare conduit and
wiring schedules per the Water Authority Drafting Manual (ESD-120).
See Attachment 6-8 for the cover page of the Water Authority Drafting
Manual.
The Design Contractor shall develop wiring diagrams for the control
system network and device-level network (e.g., Foundation Fieldbus), if
used. Refer to the EI-GD (see Attachment 6-3) for additional
information.
I. Training Requirements
The Design Contractor shall specify training requirements in the
Contract Documents. Control systems related training is to be
performed before the Site Acceptance Testing starts (refer to Section
6.6.2). Training is always conducted twice to allow for adequate
coverage of normal activities. Technical training is to be conducted
using the equipment that is identical to the installed equipment (the
spares may be used for this purpose). A syllabus of the training and a
description of the equipment to be used in the training shall be
submitted 30 days before the training starts. Some of the training
requirements are included in the following documents:
Design Contractor Guide (ESD-160; Volume One): Section
16.2.3-4 of Chapter 16 (O&M Manuals, and Lifecycle Cost
Analysis and O&M Impact Reports).
Design Contractor Guide (ESD-160; Volume One): Section
20.4 of Chapter 20 (Startup and Commissioning, Closeout
and Warranty).
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 6. SCADA and Instrumentation & Control
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
October 2007 6-24 REV 00
The following specification sections in the GC&SS (see
Attachment 6-1):
o Programmable Logic Controller.
o Programming Software for Programmable Logic
Controller.
o General Instrumentation System Requirements.
J. Construction Contractors Requirements
In addition to installation, testing, debugging, startup, and
commissioning of the I&C system, the Design Contractor shall specify
in the contract documents the following requirements to be followed by
the Construction Contractor:
Attend regular I&C system meetings to discuss, resolve, and
assign responsibilities for all I&C system issues. These
meetings shall be separate from the regular construction
progress meetings. The frequency of these meetings is
determined based on project-specific needs.
Fully coordinate with the Design Contractor, and/or the I&C
system integrator, during testing and startup of the control
system.
Be responsible for preparing loop diagrams and
equipment/instrument calibration sheets. Refer to the
General Instrumentation System Requirements
specification section in the GC&SS (see Attachment 6-1) for
more information on instrument calibration requirements.
Coordinate with the Water Authority Operations and
Maintenance Department while making communication
connections to the Water Authority network.
Drawings and diagrams submitted by the Construction
Contractor as part of the O&M Manual shall be according to
the ISO standards for presentation (ISO TC 46/SC9), and
shall reflect final field conditions.
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 6. SCADA and Instrumentation & Control
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
October 2007 6-25 REV 00
6.6 Testing and Acceptance
6.6.1
General
The Design Contractor shall follow the requirements outlined below for
testing, startup, and commissioning of the instrumentation and control
system. The Design Contractor shall refer to Chapters 19
(Construction Phase), and 20 (Startup and Commissioning, Closeout
and Warranty) of the Design Contractor Guide (ESD-160; Volume One)
for additional requirements.
6.6.2
Factory
Acceptance
Testing (FAT)
The project specification prepared by the Design Contractor shall
require factory acceptance testing (FAT) of the project I&C system.
The FAT greatly reduces the difficulty of debugging during field testing.
The difficulty and expense of fixing anything onsite is much greater
than at the factory. Also, the schedule pressure to get the control
system in operation intensifies after the equipment and instruments
have been delivered, often resulting in poor startup practices.
The FAT shall:
Be conducted prior to shipping any element of the control
system to the site.
Demonstrate the complete functionality of the control system
including proper operation, sequencing, logic and
diagnostics.
Be conducted jointly by the Design Contractor and the I&C
subcontractor (i.e., control-system supplier) to the
Construction Contractor.
A. Operational Test Procedures
The Design Contractor shall prepare the I&C system preliminary FAT
plan, covering all requirements and logistics. The preliminary FAT plan
shall include written descriptions of how individual tests shall be
performed. The preliminary FAT plan shall be submitted by the Design
Contractor with design submittals at the mid-point and final design
levels. Refer to Chapter 4, Design Development, of the Design
Contractor Guide (ESD-160; Volume One) for more information. The
Design Contractor shall specify in the Contract Documents that the
preliminary FAT plan be finalized by the control-system supplier and
submitted for review and approval.
The control-system FAT shall include:
Major control panels and cabinets.
Devices within panels and cabinets including terminal blocks,
power supply, I/O modules, communication devices, etc.
PLC I/O points, including all control sequences, along with
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 6. SCADA and Instrumentation & Control
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
October 2007 6-26 REV 00
their respective HMI status. If logistically possible,
equipment shall be included during the I/O testing. If this is
not possible, simulation logic shall be written to provide
responses to the actual control logic, or simulators shall be
programmed to respond as the equipment would.
Panel and cabinet wiring shall be checked for continuity and
for compliance with wiring diagrams.
Networks including communication with at least one of each
type of field devices.
Digitally communicating devices (e.g., Foundation Fieldbus)
shall be installed, wired, and tested for the network type.
The FAT shall be conducted at the control-system supplier facilities and
witnessed by the Construction Manager and the Water Authority. The
control-system supplier shall supply all control-system PLCs, panels,
instruments and devices. The control-system supplier shall be
responsible for setting all the panels, PLCs, instruments, etc. at their
testing facility. The control-system supplier shall be responsible for
coordinating with other device manufacturers for proper communication
over digital device-level networks (e.g., Foundation-Fieldbus), if used.
The Design Contractor shall be responsible for:
Developing the programs for the PLC(s).
Uploading the programs into the PLC(s) at the control-
system supplier facility.
Ensuring that the elements of the FAT are conducted per the
FAT submittal.
B. FAT Report
The project specification prepared by the Design Contractor shall
require the control- system supplier to submit a FAT report. The project
specification shall list the following minimum information to be included
in the FAT report:
Methodology used to carry out the FAT and whether it is in
conformance with the specification FAT plan.
Items that have been tested and whether they are physically
present or a simulator is used.
Record of the results of all tests.
Problems/Issues that came up as a result of the FAT.
Proposed methodology for rework / retest to correct all errors
discovered during the FAT and the rework schedule.
The Design Contractor shall prepare a FAT report using the one
submitted by the control-system supplier as a base. The Design
Contractor shall attest to the information included in the control-system
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 6. SCADA and Instrumentation & Control
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
October 2007 6-27 REV 00
suppliers FAT report and shall highlight deviations from the FAT plan.
The Design Contractor shall recommend to the Construction Manager
whether approval be granted for shipping the control-system
components from the location of testing to the project site.
6.6.3
Site Acceptance
Testing (SAT)
A. Operational Test Procedures
The project specifications prepared by the Design Contractor shall
specify requirements for site acceptance testing (SAT). These
requirements shall include a schedule of operational tests, to be
witnessed by the Construction Manager and the Water Authority O&M
Department, that demonstrate the proper operation of the control
system. Following installation of the I&C system, the control-system
supplier shall be required to demonstrate the proper operation of all
components of the I&C system including equipment, instruments and
devices. The testing shall be conducted jointly by the control-system
supplier and the Design Contractor.
B. Equipment and Instrument Certificates
The project specifications shall require the Construction Contractor to
submit written certifications that all equipment are installed, tested, and
are operating according to the manufacturers recommendations. In
most cases, these certifications are written by the Construction
Contractors subcontractors and suppliers. Certifications shall be
provided for the following equipment:
Flow meters.
Valves.
Pressure gauges and switches.
Other equipment, instruments, and appurtenances as
required.
C. Facility Testing
All testing requirements outlined above in Section 6.6.1, FAT, shall be
repeated for the project site testing. In addition, the following shall also
be tested:
All analog inputs and outputs shall have their calibration
checked by injecting current or voltage at a minimum of four
values spanning the range of the analog signal.
Monitoring and control of devices via device-level digital
network (e.g., Foundation-Fieldbus) shall be tested.
System testing including automatic control modes
(operational scenarios) and interlocks.
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 6. SCADA and Instrumentation & Control
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
October 2007 6-28 REV 00
D. Startup and Commissioning Report
The control-system supplier shall prepare and submit a Startup and
Commissioning Report that includes:
Test procedure(s).
Summaries of recorded I/Os.
List of all instruments used in the testing.
Revised settings of various equipment and instrumentation, if
any.
Revised performance data of equipment as obtained during
the startup testing.
Failures and corrective actions.
The Design Contractor shall prepare a SAT report using the Startup
and Commissioning Report submitted by the control-system supplier as
a base. The Design Contractor shall attest to the information included
in the control-system suppliers SAT report and shall highlight
deviations from the SAT requirements. The Design Contractor shall
recommend to the Construction Manager whether acceptance of the
control system shall be granted.
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 6. SCADA and Instrumentation & Control
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
Attachment 6-1: Cover Page of the Water Authority General Conditions and Standard
Specifications
General Conditions and
Standard Specifications
2005 Edition
John A. Economides
Director of Engineering
October 2007 6-29 REV 00
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 6. SCADA and Instrumentation & Control
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
Attachment 6-2: Cover Page of the Water Authority Standard Drawings & Standard Details
October 2007 6-30 REV 00
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 6. SCADA and Instrumentation & Control
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
Attachment 6-3: Cover Page of the Water Authority Electrical/Instrumentation Guide
Drawings
October 2007 6-31 REV 00
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 6. SCADA and Instrumentation & Control
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
Attachment 6-4: Cover Page of the Water Authority PLC Implementation Standards
October 2007 6-32 REV 00
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 6. SCADA and Instrumentation & Control
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
Attachment 6-5: Cover Page of the ASCE/AWWA/WEF Interim Security Guidance for Water
Utilities
October 2007 6-33 REV 00
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 6. SCADA and Instrumentation & Control
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
Attachment 6-6: Cover Page of the ASCE/AWWA/WEF Guidelines for Physical Security of
Water Utilities
October 2007 6-34 REV 00
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 6. SCADA and Instrumentation & Control
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
Attachment 6-7: Cover Page of the Water Authority Human Machine Interface Standards
October 2007 6-35 REV 00
SDCWA Design Manual Chapter 6. SCADA and Instrumentation & Control
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
Attachment 6-8: Cover Page of the Water Authority Drafting Manual (ESD-120)
SDCWA
San Diego County Water Authority
Engineering Department
.
Drafting Manual
ESD-120 March 2004
October 2007 6-36 REV 00
October 2007 Appendix A Rev 00
APPENDIX A
of the
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE
Supplemental Seismic Design Criteria
for Water Facilities
NOTE: Appendix A is provided as supplemental information only. Any use of the
information contained herein does not absolve the Design Contractor of its responsibility
for the design as engineer of record.
October 2007 Appendix A Rev 00
This page left blank intentionally
SDCWA Design Manual Appendix A. Supplemental Seismic Design Criteria
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE for Water Facilities
October 2007 A-1 REV 00
Appendix A
Supplemental Seismic Design Criteria for Water Facilities
A.1 General
A.1.1 Appendix A is provided as supplemental information only. Any use of the information contained
herein does not absolve the Design Contractor of its responsibility for the design as engineer of record.
A.2 Site Criteria
The facilities are located in an area where the level of seismicity ranges from moderate to high. The hazards
associated with such potential seismic activity include:
Fault rupture at site traversed by active faults;
Ground motions generated by earthquakes occurring on nearby or distant faults;
Instability of slopes at or near the site;
Liquefaction, in saturated cohesionless soil strata underlying the site of a facility, that may lead to loss of
bearing for shallow foundations, lateral support of deep foundations, settlements, lateral spreads and/or
lateral flows, and buoyancy effects;
Loss of strength in cohesive soil strata underlying a facility that may lead to comparable consequences.
Some of these hazards need to be identified and evaluated on an area or system-wide basis and some
require site-specific investigations. Evaluation of fault activities and the potential for fault rupture across a
facility and estimation of earthquake ground motions generated for a generic site condition (e.g., rock
outcrop) need to be performed on an area or system-wide basis. The other hazards, including estimating
earthquake ground motions to account for a local site condition, instability of slopes, liquefaction of saturated
cohesionless soils, or loss of strength of cohesive soils require site-specific investigations.
These hazard evaluations must include geologic, seismologic, and geotechnical studies.
A.2.1 Geologic Studies
Regional and site geologic studies may be required. These hazard evaluations should include identification
of faults and other geologic features that may affect project facilities. Both distant and nearby faults should
be identified for the purpose of assessing the potential of each fault for generating earthquake ground
motions. The following parameters should be identified for each fault:
Fault location and geometry (length, strike, dip etc.);
Style of faulting (strike slip, thrust, normal);
Relative degree of activity (average slip rate);
Historical earthquakes that can be ascribed to the fault;
Maximum earthquake;
Recurrence relationship.
The following additional parameters should be ascertained for faults that may traverse a project facility
Sense of displacement;
Historic fault displacements along the fault, including maximum, minimum and average;
Estimated fault displacement at the project facility.
Uncertainties should also be provided for each parameter.
A.2.2 Seismologic Studies
Seismologic studies may be needed to assess the seismicity of the region and to establish earthquake
events that will be used in the analyses, evaluation, and design of the project facilities. These studies should
SDCWA Design Manual Appendix A. Supplemental Seismic Design Criteria
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE for Water Facilities
October 2007 A-2 REV 00
cover historic seismicity, including recurrence relationships for the region and for each source identified in
the geologic studies. The information gathered should be sufficient to conduct both a deterministic and
probabilistic evaluation of earthquake ground motions for a generic site condition (e.g., rock outcrop).
Estimation of earthquake ground motions at rock outcrops using either deterministic or probabilistic
evaluations should follow accepted practice (refer to Paragraph A.2.4.2). These motions should be described
in terms of target response spectra. Representative time histories should also be used in conjunction with
these spectra. The spectra as well as the time histories should account for forward directivity and for fling
considering the relative position of the project facilities with respect to the location of the potential seismic
sources.
A.2.3 Geotechnical Studies
The following site-specific information may be required at each project facility.
Subsurface conditions (including stratigraphy, water level) at a select number of locations at the site
Topographic variations at the site, especially presence of slopes within or adjacent to the site
Engineering characteristics of the various soil strata.
A California-licensed geotechnical engineer determines whether previous investigations and field work
performed for the site are sufficient. If not, a field investigation or laboratory testing program, or both, may be
required. The extent of geotechnical studies should be detailed for facilities that are classified per Facility
Design Guide, Chapter 5, Table 5-2, as SPC 2 or 3, or PFC 3 or 4.
These data, together with the results of the geologic and seismological studies, should be used for
appropriate evaluations. The following are examples of typical evaluations:
Modification of target spectra determined in the seismological studies to account for local site effects
such modifications may be accommodated with appropriate empirical or numerical procedures.
The potential for liquefaction, in saturated cohesionless soil strata underlying the site of a facility.
Consequences of liquefaction that may lead to loss of bearing for shallow foundations, loss of lateral
support of deep foundations, settlements, lateral spreads, and/or lateral flows, and buoyancy effects.
Remediation to mitigate such consequences, as appropriate.
Loss of strength in cohesive soil strata underlying the site of a facility that may lead to consequences
comparable to those caused by liquefaction. Remediation to mitigate such consequences, as
appropriate.
Landslides that may be initiated in slopes at or near the site of the project facility.
Seismic lateral pressures on retaining walls, basement walls and other belowground structures.
For long linear systems such as pipelines, the effects of traveling waves and ground deformation should
be considered.
Investigations, laboratory testing, and engineering evaluations should be conducted and supervised by
qualified personnel, conform to established standards, and use established standards and procedures as
described in the references included below and elsewhere.
Tokimatsu, K. and H. B. Seed, 1987, Evaluation of Settlement in Sands Due to Earthquake Shaking,
Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 113, No. 8.
ORourke, T.D., An Overview of Geotechnical and Lifeline Earthquake Engineering. Geotechnical
Special Publication No. 75, ASCE, Reston, VA, Proceedings of Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering
and Soil Dynamics Conference, Seattle, WA, Aug. 1998, Vol. 2, pp.1392-1426.
Bird, J., ORourke, T.D., Bracegirdle, A., Bommer, J. and Tromans, I., A Framework for Assessing
Earthquake Hazards for Major Pipelines. Proceedings of the International Conference on Terrain and
Geohazards Facing Onshore Oil and Gas Pipelines, London, UK, June, 2004.
ASCE (1984) Guidelines for the Seismic Design of Oil and Gas Pipeline Systems, Committee on Gas
and Liquid Fuel Lifelines, Technical Council on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering, ASCE, Reston, VA.
SDCWA Design Manual Appendix A. Supplemental Seismic Design Criteria
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE for Water Facilities
October 2007 A-3 REV 00
ORourke, T. D., Wang, Y., and Shi, P. (2004). Advances in Lifeline Earthquake Engineering.
Proceedings of 13
th
World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, British Columbia,
Canada, Aug., 2004, Paper No. 5003.
ORourke, M.J. and X. Liu, 1998, Response of Buried Pipelines subject to Earthquake effects,
Monograph Number 3, MCEER.
ALA 2005, Seismic Guidelines for Water Pipelines, American Lifelines Alliance, March 2002.
Seed, M. B. and R. V. Whitman, 1970, Design of Earth Retention Structures for Dynamic Loads, ASCE
Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, June 1970.
Ostadan and White, 1987, Lateral Seismic Soil Pressurean Updated Approach, U.S.-Japan
Workshop on SSI Analysis, U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California, 1987.
Ebeling et al., 1992, The Seismic Design of Waterfront Retaining Structures, Department of the Army,
Waterway Experiment Station, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, technical report ITL-92-11.
Ishihara, K., and Yoshimine, M., 1992, Evaluation of settlements in sand deposits following liquefaction
during earthquakes, Soils and Foundations, Japanese Geotechnical Society, Tokyo, Vol. 32, No. 1,
pp. 173188.
Bray, J. D., Sancio, R. B., Riemer, M. F., and Durgunoglu, T., 2004a. Liquefaction susceptibility of fine-
grained soils. 11th Int. Conf. on Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering and 3rd Int. Conf. on
Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, D. Doolin et al., eds., Stallion Press, pp. 655-662.
Idriss, I. M. and Boulanger, R. W. (2004). Semi-empirical procedures for evaluating liquefaction potential
during earthquakes. Proc., 11th Int. Conference on Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, and 3rd
Int. Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, D. Doolin et al., eds., Stallion Press, Vol. 1,
32-56.
Kulhawy, F. H., and Mayne, P. W., 1990. Manual on estimating soil properties for foundation design.
Report EPRI EL-6800, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California.
Boulanger, R. W., and Idriss, I. M., 2004. Evaluating the potential for liquefaction or cyclic failure of silts
and clays. Report No. UCD/CGM-04/01, Center for Geotechnical Modeling, Dept. of Civil & Envir.
Engrg., Univ. of California, Davis, 129 pp. http://cee.engr.ucdavis.edu/faculty/
boulanger/PDFs/2004/Boulanger_Idriss_CGM04-01_2004.pdf.
Makdisi, F. I., and Seed, H. B., 1978. Simplified procedure for estimating dam and embankment
earthquake-induced deformations. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 104(GT7),
849-867.
Seed, R. B., Cetin, K. O., Moss, R. E. S., Kammerer, A., Wu, J., Pestana, J., Riemer, M., Sancio, R. B.,
Bray, J. D., Kayen, R. E., and Faris, A., 2003. Recent advances in soil liquefaction engineering: A
unified and consistent framework. Keynote presentation, 26th Annual ASCE Los Angeles Geotechnical
Spring Seminar, Long Beach, California.
A.2.4 Ground Shaking
A.2.4.1 Ground Motion Parameters
The parameters required to characterize the seismic loads for engineering analysis or design of a structure
will depend on the method used to analyze the structure. For purposes of engineering design, the effects of
ground shaking on facilities and components at a site are typically characterized by elastic acceleration
response spectra. These spectra provide acceleration response as a function of period or frequency of a
single-degree-of-freedom system attached to the ground, for a certain damping level. Unless it can be
justified otherwise, 5% damping should be used in both designs and evaluations, except for reservoirs and
tanks. For reservoirs and tanks, design spectra for 2% damping and 0.5% damping should be used for the
impulsive and convective modes of response, respectively. When required, acceleration time histories
should be developed to be compatible with the spectra prescribed herein. For above ground structures with
first mode period of 1 second or longer, as well as the first sloshing mode for tanks and reservoirs, and
located within 10 km of an active fault, the ground motions should account for fling effects. The following
reference includes a model for fling:
SDCWA Design Manual Appendix A. Supplemental Seismic Design Criteria
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE for Water Facilities
October 2007 A-4 REV 00
Abrahamson, N. A. (2002), Velocity pulses in near-fault ground motions, Proceedings, UC Berkeley-
CUREE Symposium in Honor of Ray Clough and Jspeh Penzien, May 9-11, 2002, Berkeley, CA, p 40-
41.
A.2.4.2 Deterministic and Probabilistic Estimates of Ground Motions
Estimates of ground motions for a given earthquake scenario are often called deterministic. The process to
make such estimates generally consists of the following steps:
Define the magnitude for the selected earthquake scenario and the closest distance from the
corresponding source to the site.
Using attenuation relationships appropriate for the source mechanism, tectonic environment, and site
soil conditions, calculate response spectral values at a selected percentile level (e.g., 84th percentile
level) for several structural periods over the range of engineering interest. Incorporate directivity effects
for long period (T over 0.5 seconds) motion.
Construct the spectrum from the calculated spectral values.
Probabilistic analysis is used to estimate earthquake ground motions associated with a selected probability
level, say a probability of exceedance over the life of the structure. Such analysis is commonly referred to as
probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA). For example, a PSHA can be used to estimate acceleration
response spectral values with a 2%, 5% or 10% probability of exceedance in 50 years at a site. These are
equivalent to 2,475 year, 975 year and 475 year return periods.
The probability that any earthquake will occur on a given source and will produce ground motions exceeding
a selected ground motion parameter value, say a selected spectral acceleration, is equal to the product of
several probabilities. They are:
The probability that the earthquake (as defined by its magnitude) will occur on the given source (e.g.,
active fault),
The conditional probability of the dimension of the rupture (length and width) given the magnitude of the
earthquake,
The conditional probability of the location of the rupture on the source, resulting in the closest distance
from the site, and
The conditional probability that the ground motions will exceed the selected acceleration (or other
parameter) given the earthquake occurs at the given distance from the site within a given directivity
parameter.
Because ground motions exceeding a selected acceleration at a site can be produced by various
earthquakes, the overall probability of exceeding the acceleration is obtained by aggregating the probabilities
that the acceleration will be exceeded by the ground motions from all possible earthquakes.
The following scenario earthquakes on active faults may be used to bound the worst case performance of
the system as a whole:
Rose Canyon M 7.1, with rupture extending from the northern San Diego County southwards to include
the extension of the Silver Strand fault.
Elsinore M 7.4 with rupture extending from southern Riverside County southeastwards.
San Andreas M 7.9 with rupture extending from northern Los Angeles County southeastwards through
Riverside County. While this scenario earthquake will not likely produce the highest ground motions
within the service area, it can produce high ground motions and potential damage to the MWD system
including the Colorado River Aqueduct and the California Aqueduct; damage to the MWD system can
impact the performance of the system.
A.2.4.3 Design Ground Motions
The design ground motions (response spectrum and time history) requirements prescribed herein should be
considered minimum requirements. Additional requirements may apply, depending on the agencies having
jurisdiction in the geographical area of the facilities, or on the type of the facilities (e.g., dams).
SDCWA Design Manual Appendix A. Supplemental Seismic Design Criteria
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE for Water Facilities
October 2007 A-5 REV 00
For the assessment of seismic geohazards and the design of system facilities other than buildings, tanks,
and equipment anchorage, ground motions should be determined by probabilistic procedures.
Design ground motions with 10% probabilities of exceedance in 50 years (475-year approximate return
period) should be used for facilities in SPCs 1, 2 and 3. In lieu of using the 475 year earthquake motions
directly, the design ground motions may be taken as 2/3 of the 2,475 year (2% in 50 year) motions, but in no
case less than the 475 year motion. The design ground motion need not exceed a deterministic limit taken
as the 84th-percentile level spectrum for the scenario earthquakes listed in Section A.2.4.2.
Design spectra for facilities in SPCs 1 and 2 may be constructed from the spectral acceleration values
presented in the latest edition of national seismic hazard maps published by the USGS and available on the
Internet at the following url: http://geohazards.cr.usgs.gov/eq/, or may be obtained from site-specific studies,
if available. Facility Design Guide, Chapter 5, Figure 5-1, shows the 2% in 50 year horizontal rock PGA
motion. If constructed from the USGS maps, the spectra should be adjusted for the soil or rock conditions at
the site using either the site class factors prescribed for the maps in the following references or site specific
response studies, if available.
Frankel, A., Mueller, C., Barnhard, T., Perkins, D., Leyendecker, E.V., Dickman, N., Hanson, S., and
Hopper, M., 1996, National seismic-hazard maps; documentation: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File
Report 96-532, 110 p.
Frankel, A., Peterson, M., Mueller, C., Haller, K., Wheeler, R., Leyendecker, E., Wesson, R., Harmsen,
S., Cramer, C., Perkins, D., and Rukstales, K., 2002, Documentation for the 2002 update of the national
seismic hazard maps: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 02-420, 33 pp.
Design spectra for facilities in SPC 3 should be obtained from a site-specific study. Such study should
account for the regional seismicity and geology, the expected recurrence and maximum magnitudes of
earthquakes, the location of the site with respect to known seismic sources, the site subsurface conditions,
and near-source effects.
Design motions (generally ground velocities) for pipelines should be taken as the 475 year, 975 year or
2,475 year motions for PFC 2, 3 or 4, respectively, as adjusted to reflect rock, firm soil or soft soil conditions
along the alignment of the pipeline. Design velocities for pipelines may be constructed using suitable
acceleration-to-velocity relationships from the one-second spectral acceleration values presented in the
latest edition of national seismic hazard maps published by the USGS and available on the Internet at the
following url: http://geohazards.cr.usgs.gov/eq/, or may be obtained from site-specific studies, if available.
Vertical response spectra should be determined in a manner consistent with that for horizontal response
spectra. Simplified procedures such as vertical motion throughout the frequency range equal to 2/3 of the
horizontal PGA should not be used. In lieu of site-specific calculations, for sites within 5 km of active faults,
the vertical response spectra may equal or exceed the horizontal spectra at high frequencies (over 2 hertz),
may be assumed to be 50% of the horizontal spectra at frequencies under 0.5 hertz, and may be linearly
interpolated at intermediate frequencies.
A.2.4.4 Selection of Fault Displacement Parameters
When a facility must be placed across a primary active fault, it should be designed with the recognition that
surface faulting or folding may occur. Surface rupture characteristics to be considered include the amount
and direction of primary fault displacement, as well as the amount, type, and distribution of secondary
deformation associated with the surface fault rupture.
A.2.4.5 Liquefaction
Liquefaction is a phenomenon in which loose, saturated, granular soils (silts, sands, and gravels) lose a
substantial amount of strength when subjected to intense ground shaking. In the simplest terms, when these
soils are strongly shaken they tend to compact and densify. If the soils are saturated, the tendency for
densification increases the pore water pressure, softening the soil as a result. Liquefaction can create a
quick condition in which the strength and bearing capacity of the soils is temporarily reduced. Also, if the
generated pore water pressures become large enough, material can be ejected from the ground in
characteristic geysers of soil-laden water.
Liquefaction of a site can be highly damaging to aboveground as well as underground structures and utilities.
Liquefaction can impose significant demands on structures located at liquefiable sites and on the foundations
SDCWA Design Manual Appendix A. Supplemental Seismic Design Criteria
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE for Water Facilities
October 2007 A-6 REV 00
that support them. These demands result from the vertical and lateral movement of the soil both during and
after liquefaction.
Potential consequences of liquefaction include bearing capacity failure, flotation of lightweight embedded
structures, landsliding (lateral spreads and flow slides), and differential settlement. Among these
consequences, large permanent ground deformations due to lateral spreads or flow slides are generally
considered to be the most significant potential hazards. Structures supported on pile foundations can be
more resistant to liquefaction damage than structures supported on shallow foundations, although buried
utilities entering such pile-supported structures may be particularly vulnerable unless suitably designed. It is
possible to reduce the liquefaction potential at a site by a number of means, including replacement or
densification of liquefaction-susceptible soils, drainage (pore water dissipation), or artificially lowering the
groundwater table.
Comprehensive soil liquefaction susceptibility mapping has not been completed throughout the San Diego
County area. In order to design or evaluate pipelines with PFC 2, 3, or 4, it is necessary to establish the
liquefaction hazard along the alignment. It is therefore a requirement of this standard that site-specific
studies be performed to better characterize the potential for liquefaction (or other types of soil failure) along
the alignment for newly construction pipelines with PFC 2, 3, or 4. Attention is drawn to any site with a water
table within 50 feet of grade where loose sandy soils exist.
The potential for liquefaction at a site of a facility should be addressed on a project-specific basis by a
California-licensed geotechnical engineer. The following paragraphs provide general guidance on the
approach to follow for these types of evaluations.
The first step in a liquefaction hazard evaluation should be the determination of liquefaction susceptibility. It
has long been recognized that loose, clean, sandy soils (i.e., sands with few fines) are potentially susceptible
to seismically induced liquefaction. Coarse, gravelly soils are also susceptible to excess pore water pressure
generation and can potentially liquefy if drainage is impeded by bounding layers of less permeable material,
finer-grained soils within the voids of the gravelly soil, or large distances to potential drainage boundaries.
Low-plasticity fines, particularly non-plastic silts and silty sands, can also be susceptible to liquefaction.
A preliminary assessment of the presence of liquefaction-susceptible soils at a site may be made by
reviewing geologic maps published by the CGS for the state. CGS geologic maps are available online from
the Internet at the following address: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/ regional/scamp/. The following lists the
currently available maps (provided on a CD) for various quadrangle sheets in San Diego and nearby
Riverside Counties:
Bonsall (Fig 5-3)
El Cajon (Fig 5-2)
Escondido (Fig 5-3)
Fallbrook (Fig 5-3)
Jamul Mountains (Fig 5-2)
Las Pulgas (Fig 5-3)
Margarita Peak (Fig 5-3)
Morro Hill (Fig 5-3)
Otay Mesa (Fig 5-2)
Pala (Fig 5-3)
Pechanga (Fig 5-3)
San Clemente (Fig 5-3)
San Onofre (Fig 5-3)
San Vicente Reservoir (Fig 5-2)
San Diego (Downtown City, La Jolla,)
Temecula (Fig 5-3)
Vail Lake (Fig 5-3)
Valley Center (Fig 5-3)
SDCWA Design Manual Appendix A. Supplemental Seismic Design Criteria
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE for Water Facilities
October 2007 A-7 REV 00
Figure A-1: Available Geologic Maps, Southern San Diego County
Figure A-2: Available Geologic Maps, North and Eastern San Diego County
SDCWA Design Manual Appendix A. Supplemental Seismic Design Criteria
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE for Water Facilities
October 2007 A-8 REV 00
The preliminary assessment should be followed by a more detailed assessment based on site-specific
information and the liquefaction screening procedure given in the following reference:
Youd, T.L., 1998. Screening Guide for Rapid Assessment of Liquefaction Hazard at Highway Bridge
Sites, Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research Technical Report MCEER-98-0005,
58 pp.
The susceptibility of fine-grained soils to exhibiting liquefaction-like behavior should be examined using the
procedures described in the following references:
Seed, R.B., Cetin, K.O., Moss, R.E.S., Kammerer, A., Wu, J., Pestana, J., Riemer, M., Sancio, R.B.,
Bray, J.D., Kayen, R.E. and Faris, A., 2003, Recent advances in soil liquefaction engineering: a unified
and consistent framework, Report No. EERC 2003-06, Earthquake Engineering Research Center,
University of California, Berkeley, June.
Boulanger, R.W. and Idriss, I.M. 2004. Evaluating the potential for liquefaction or cyclic failure of silts
and clays, Center for Geotechnical Modeling, Report No. UCD/CGM-04/01, University of California,
Davis, December.
Once a soil deposit has been determined to include liquefaction-susceptible soils, the potential for triggering
of liquefaction must be evaluated. Such an evaluation involves comparison of the loading imposed on the
soil by earthquake shaking with the liquefaction resistance of the soil.
Two basic approaches are generally available to evaluate the liquefaction resistance of soils: (1) empirical
correlations between the results of in situ testing and field performance during past earthquakes, and
(2) laboratory testing of representative samples. The first is now the most commonly used approach and is
recommended. However, for special projects, laboratory testing may be an appropriate supplement to in situ
testing for evaluation of the liquefaction susceptibility and resistance of certain fine-grained soils.
The in situ tests most commonly used to evaluate the liquefaction resistance of soils are: (1) the standard
penetration test (SPT), (2) the cone penetration test (CPT), (3) the Becker-Hammer Penetration Test (BPT),
and (4) measurements of shear wave velocity, Vs.
The SPT is viewed as offering the greatest reliability for estimating liquefaction resistance at present,
provided it is applicable to the site soil conditions. The soil conditions for which the SPT resistance is
deemed a reliable indicator of liquefaction resistance correspond to cohesionless sandy and silty soils with
limited amounts of gravel-sized particles. For highly stratified soil conditions the CPT is a good supplement
to the SPT to identify potential problem soils. The BPT should be used to supplement the SPT in evaluating
the liquefaction resistance of deposits of gravelly soils. In general, the BPT is required for a reliable
assessment of the liquefaction resistance of soils with more than about 20% gravel. The choice of in situ test
for a project should be made on a project-specific basis depending on the applicability of each method to the
site conditions.
Of the currently available correlations, the correlations in the following two references incorporate the most
extensive database of field performance case histories and the most rigorous analysis of the data.
Seed, R.B., Cetin, K.O., Moss, R.E.S., Kammerer, A., Wu, J., Pestana, J., Riemer, M., Sancio, R.B.,
Bray, J.D., Kayen, R.E. and Faris, A. 2003 Recent advances in soil liquefaction engineering: a unified
and consistent framework, Report No. EERC 2003-06, Earthquake Engineering Research Center,
University of California, Berkeley, June.
Idriss, I.M. and Boulanger, R.W. 2004. Semi-empirical procedures for evaluating liquefaction potential
during earthquakes, Proceedings of 11th International Conference on Soil Dynamics and Earthquake
Engineering and 3rd International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Berkeley,
California.
Youd, T.L. et al., 2001. Liquefaction Resistance of Soils: Summary Report from the 1996 NCEER and
1998 NCEER/NSF Workshops on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils, Journal of
Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, New York, NY, Vol.127, No.10, Oct., 817-833.
Accordingly, it is recommended that these be used as the primary correlations for estimating liquefaction
resistance based on the SPT. The selection of correlations for the CPT and BPT should be made on a
project-specific basis. Additional guidance on the selection of those correlations is provided in the above-
mentioned references.
SDCWA Design Manual Appendix A. Supplemental Seismic Design Criteria
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE for Water Facilities
October 2007 A-9 REV 00
A.2.6 Lateral Spreads and Slope Movements
Lateral spreads and slumping are ground-failure phenomena that can occur on sloping ground. If the site has
a significant slope, or is adjacent to an open cut (e.g., depressed stream or road bed), liquefaction and soil
failure can cause the flow of materials down slope or towards the cut. The effect of lateral spreading on
adjacent structures should be considered. The empirical procedure presented in the following references
should be used to estimate lateral spreading displacements. The uncertainty inherent in these displacement
estimates should be considered.
Youd, T.L., Hansen, C.M. & Bartlett, S.F., 1999. Revised MLR equations for predicting lateral spread
displacement. ASCE Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 128 (12), 1007-1017.
Bardet, J.P, N. Mace, T. Tobita, and J. Hu, 2002, Regional Modeling of Liquefaction-induced Ground
Deformation Earthquake Spectra, EERI, Vol. 18, pp. 19-46.
Flow slides can occur in embankments or slopes when the residual strength of liquefied soil within the
embankment/slope or its foundation drops below the shear stress required to maintain static equilibrium. The
potential for flow slide instability should be evaluated using conventional limit-equilibrium stability analysis
procedures. In such analyses, the residual strength should be assigned to any soil layer in which liquefaction
is expected.
Even in the absence of flow slides, all embankments and slopes may experience movement during strong
shaking. Such movements may cause gross deformation of an embankment or slope or impart additional
loads on buried pipelines and other facilities and components embedded in an embankment or in the vicinity
of a slope. Simplified procedures such as those given in the following reference may be used to estimate
slope movements.
Makdisi and Seed, 1977, A Simplified Method for Estimating Earthquake-Induced Deformation in Dams
and Embankments, Report No. UCB/EERC-77/19, College of Engineering, University of California,
Berkeley, August 1977.
The above method may also be used for estimating slope movement when limited loss of soil shear strength
is expected. For such cases, appropriate shear strength reduction should be used in the evaluation.
A.2.7 Landslides
Landslides occur when the combination of gravitational and ground shaking-induced inertial forces
temporarily exceeds the strength of the earth materials in the slope. Landslides are often triggered by strong
ground shaking, particularly in areas close to the causative fault. Any site on or adjacent to a steep slope or
bluff should be considered susceptible to landslide damage. The concern is that a facility may lie within a
landslide zone, below a slope whose failure may send debris into the facility, or above an unstable slope
whose movement could undermine key facilities.
Landslides commonly are complex features that may consist of both rotational and translational movements
in their upper parts, sometimes transforming to debris flows in their lower parts. Water generally plays an
important role in landslides by oversteepening of slopes through surface erosion, by increasing pore water
pressures, and/or by adding weight to a soil mass when it is saturated. Other factors that influence landslides
are: (1) pre-existing slope movements; (2) strength of the rock/soil material; (3) slope angle; and (4) the
orientation and density of rock structures, such as bedding, joint, and fault planes. Earthquake ground
shaking can reduce the stability of a slope and cause sliding or falling of the soil or rock materials composing
the slope.
The potential for landslides at hillside sites, or sites adjacent to steep slopes, bluffs, and/or cuts, should be
addressed by a California-licensed geotechnical engineer or engineering geologist. A typical landslide
investigation could include review of available references (maps, reports); air photo interpretation; site
reconnaissance; subsurface exploration, e.g., test pits, test borings, seismic profiling; laboratory testing; and
engineering analysis.
If necessary, recommendations for mitigating the effects of potential landslides should be provided. This
could include earthwork activities, e.g., slope flattening, buttress fills; structural solutions, e.g., retaining
walls, tiebacks; or drainage measures (surface and subsurface) as well as re-siting of the existing or
proposed facility, if possible.
SDCWA Design Manual Appendix A. Supplemental Seismic Design Criteria
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE for Water Facilities
October 2007 A-10 REV 00
A.2.8 Settlements
Because liquefaction involves the generation of excess pore water pressure, some settlement of the ground
surface should be expected as those pore water pressures dissipate following liquefaction. Settlements may
also occur in loose to medium-dense, unsaturated cohesionless soils above the groundwater table. The
amount of settlement is related to the density of the soils and the level of cyclic strain induced in the soil by
earthquake shaking.
Differential settlement can damage structures. Differential settlement may be expected when different soil
types vary in thickness and extent over a site. Buried pipes at locations where they enter vaults have the
potential hazard of differential settlement.
Settlements caused by seismic motions in granular soil deposits and in saturated loose granular deposits
may be estimated following the procedures in:
Tokimatsu, K. and H. B. Seed, 1987, Evaluation of Settlement in Sands Due to Earthquake Shaking,
Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 113, No. 8.
Ishihara, K., and Yoshimine, M. (1992) "Evaluation of settlements in sand deposits following liquefaction
during earthquakes," Soils and Foundations, Japanese Geotechnical Society, Tokyo, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp.
173188.
The above procedures account for the denseness of the soil and the level of shaking induced at different
depths. These procedures should be used with care in highly stratified deposits where its accuracy is not as
well established, partly due to potential settlement of non-liquefied layers trapped between liquefied layers as
described in the following reference.
Martin, G.R., Tsai, C.F., and Arulmoli, K., 1991. A Practical Assessment of Liquefaction Effects and
Remediation Needs, Proceedings, Second International Conference on Recent Advances in
Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, St. Louis, Missouri.
A.2.9 Wave Propagation Hazards
For long linear systems such as pipelines, the effects of traveling waves and ground deformation should be
considered in the design and evaluation. Traveling waves have detrimental and accumulative effects on long
extended structures such as pipelines. The following references provide guidance on determining wave
propagation effects on pipelines:
ORourke, T.D., An Overview of Geotechnical and Lifeline Earthquake Engineering. Geotechnical
Special Publication No. 75, ASCE, Reston, VA, Proceedings of Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering
and Soil Dynamics Conference, Seattle, WA, Aug. 1998, Vol. 2, pp.1392-1426.
ORourke, T. D., Wang, Y., and Shi, P. (2004). Advances in Lifeline Earthquake Engineering.
Proceedings of 13
th
World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, British Columbia,
Canada, Aug., 2004, Paper No. 5003.
Wang, Y., T.D. ORourke, and P. Shi, Seismic Wave Effects on the Longitudinal Forces and Pullout of
Underground Lifelines, Proceedings, 8th National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, San
Francisco, CA, Apr. 2006, EERI, Oakland, CA,
ORourke, M.J., and X. Liu, 1998, Response of Buried Pipelines subject to Earthquake effects,
Monograph Number 3, MCEER.
ALA 2005, Seismic Guidelines for Water Pipelines, American Lifelines Alliance, March 2002.
A.2.10 Seismic Soil Pressure on Structures and Retaining Walls
In the design of structures and retaining walls, appropriate static and seismic soil pressure increments
should be considered. Seismic incremental pressures depend on the yielding condition of the retaining
structure. The following references provide guidance in determining the soil pressures on structures and
retaining walls:
Seed, M. B. and R. V. Whitman, 1970, Design of Earth Retention Structures for Dynamic Loads, ASCE
Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, June 1970.
SDCWA Design Manual Appendix A. Supplemental Seismic Design Criteria
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE for Water Facilities
October 2007 A-11 REV 00
Ostadan and White, 1987, Lateral Seismic Soil Pressurean Updated Approach, U.S.-Japan
Workshop on SSI Analysis, U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California, 1987.
Ebeling et al., 1992, The Seismic Design of Waterfront Retaining Structures, Department of the Army,
Waterway Experiment Station, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, technical report ITL-92-11.
Nadim, F. and Whitman, R. V., 1981, Seismic analysis and design of retaining walls, Soil Dynamics
and Earthquake Engineering, pp. 387-407.
Whitman, R. V. (1990) Seismic design and behavior of gravity retaining walls, Design & Performance of
Earth Retaining Structures, ASCE, P.C. Lambe and L.A. Hansen eds., Ithaca, NY, pp. 817-842.
A.3 Buildings and Building-Like Structures
A.3.1 Applicability
This section is applicable to new buildings and building-like structures, including pipe bridges, except above
ground storage tanks which are addressed in Section A.7. For general policy on the evaluation and retrofit of
existing structures, see Section A.12.
For the purposes of this section, a building is defined as any enclosed or partially enclosed above grade
structure that provides for shelter of persons or equipment, and that is occasionally occupied. A building-like
structure is any unenclosed above grade structure that has one of the lateral-force-resisting systems defined
in Table 12.2-1 of ASCE 7-02.
A.3.2 Design Basis of New Buildings
The design of all elements of buildings, including structural elements of the lateral-force-resisting system,
structural elements not part of the lateral-force-resisting system, and non-structural elements should as a
minimum comply with all applicable sections of the 2006 IBC, except as modified herein.
A.3.2.1 Classification of Buildings
Seismic Use Groups for new buildings are defined in Section 1616.2 of IBC 2006. A Seismic Use Group of 1,
2, and 3 should be assigned to facilities with SPC 1, 2, and 3, respectively.
A.3.2.2 Importance Factors
Importance factors for SPC 1, 2, and 3 are equal to 1.0, 1.25, and 1.5, respectively. The Importance Factor
(I) for non-structural elements should be 1.5 for facilities with SPC 2 and 3, and 1.0 for Class 1 facilities.
A.3.3 Special Detailing Requirements
In addition to the applicable detailing requirements of the 2006 IBC, the following should apply.
A.3.3.1 Timber Structures
1. Design of timber structures should be in accordance with IBC 2006, Chapter 23, except as
modified herein. The provisions of the IBC 2006 Section 2308 Conventional Light-Frame
Construction, should not be used to satisfy the requirements for a lateral-force-resisting system.
2. The following construction should not be used as elements of the lateral-force-resisting systems
for new buildings or new components of existing buildings, but may be used at 50% of code value
as existing archaic materials (Note if seismic upgrade is performed, archaic materials may
continue to be used at 50% of code value):
Diagonally or straight sheathed timber diaphragms or shear walls
Gypsum board diaphragms or shear walls
Shear walls constructed of metal studs with diagonal strap braces
Braced shear panels consisting of let-in braces
Oriented Strand Board (OSB) should not be used in applications subject to high moisture
conditions or if it will be exposed to inclement weather during construction
SDCWA Design Manual Appendix A. Supplemental Seismic Design Criteria
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE for Water Facilities
October 2007 A-12 REV 00
3. Wood diaphragms should be provided with continuous chord elements at the perimeter of the
diaphragm. Where chords change direction (e.g., T or L shaped structures) and for wall
anchorage of concrete and masonry structures, local collector elements should develop the
resulting secondary forces into the main diaphragm or into a sub-diaphragm, meeting the
required span/depth requirements, which spans between continuous collectors in the main
diaphragm.
4. Wood diaphragms and shear walls should be provided with local chords around all penetrations
exceeding 2 feet in dimension. Chords should be designed to develop the secondary forces due
to flexure in the diaphragm. They should extend a minimum of 2 feet beyond the edge of the
opening of each direction. A recommended procedure can be found in Diekmann (1989).
5. Requirements for panel field and edge nailing, nailing to chords, collectors, splices in members,
and similar connections should be clearly called out on the design drawings (see IBC 2006
Chapter 23).
6. Joists and rafters framing horizontal diaphragms should be solidly blocked where bearing on
shear walls or other vertical elements of the lateral-force-resisting system. Shear transfer
between timber diaphragms and vertical elements of the lateral-force-resisting system should not
be accomplished with toe nails (use framing angles or other means not relying on toe nails).
7. Diaphragms should be provided with continuous seismic force collectors, capable of resisting
both tension and compression at all shear walls or other vertical elements of the
lateral-force-resisting system.
8. Shear walls, whenever practical, should be continuous from the roof to the foundation. Shear
walls at an upper story of a structure should not terminate on wood framing, unless that framing
is designed for times the required seismic forces (ASCE 7-05, Table 12.2-1).
9. Tensile ties between wood framing elements of diaphragms and shear walls should be designed
considering all eccentricities inherent in the connection and resulting from such eccentricities. In
particular, posts containing hold down devices should be designed for both bending and direct
stresses considering eccentricities and reduction of section due to bolts or let-ins. Nailing of
plywood sheathing should be detailed to prevent tearing loose of the corner adjacent to the hold
down device.
10. All connections of wood framing incorporating bolted connections with metal side plates should
provide for shrinkage and contraction of the wood elements, perpendicular to the wood grain.
Malleable iron or cut plate washers should be provided on all bolt heads and nuts bearing against
wood members.
A.3.3.2 Reinforced Masonry Structures
1. All masonry structures should be of reinforced construction. No unreinforced concrete masonry
unit walls should be used for any portion of any project
2. Determination of masonry strength should be in accordance with IBC requirements and empirical
design of masonry should not be used. All hollow unit masonry should be grouted solid. Running
bond or stack bond construction is acceptable.
3. All solid unit masonry should be multi-wythe running bond construction with fully grouted
reinforced cores present between wythes. Wythes of masonry should be fully bonded to the
reinforced cores using wire-type joint reinforcement or other similar mechanical attachment.
4. Special inspection, per 2006 IBC, Section 1701,should be specified for all reinforced masonry
construction. Special inspection should include verification of source and strength of masonry
units, proportioning and mixing of mortar and grout, placement of reinforcement and embedded
items, clean out of grout spaces prior to grouting, and grouting procedures.
A.3.3.3 Reinforced Concrete Structures
1. All concrete construction should be reinforced. Plain, unreinforced concrete should not be used.
2. Critical anchorage to concrete structures for seismic force resistance should be accomplished by
cast-in-place anchors wherever practical. Cast-in-place anchors should be designed in
SDCWA Design Manual Appendix A. Supplemental Seismic Design Criteria
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE for Water Facilities
October 2007 A-13 REV 00
accordance with the strength design provisions of IBC 2006 Section 1913. The use of drilled-in
anchors, either adhesive or mechanical type, should include design values published in an ICC-
ES evaluation report. Drilled-in anchors should be subject to special inspection, and 25% of all
installed anchors should be field tension tested to 160% of their published allowable capacities.
3. Anchor design, whenever practical, should be controlled by yielding of the steel anchor as
opposed to shear failure of the concrete (i.e., ductile design). Ductile design precludes brittle
failure and, at the same time, limits the damage to the supported equipment. If ductile design is
not feasible, anchors should be designed to have a strength equal to system overstrength factor
(ASCE 7-05, Table 12.2-1) times the calculated seismic forces (with load factors of unity).
4. Precast concrete elements should not be used as continuous diaphragms or shear walls unless
shear transfer between adjacent units is accomplished through the embedment of dowels from
adjacent units in a common cast-in-place joining strip. Precast concrete elements may be used
as individual, independent above grade shear walls, when designed for the overturning and shear
demands on each panel.
5. Mechanical couplers used to splice reinforcing bars should be of uniaxial design and should be
certified capable of transferring 125% of the nominal strength of the coupled bars.
6. Reinforcing bar to be welded should conform to American Society for Testing and Materials
(ASTM) Standard A-706, Specification for Low-Alloy Steel Deformed Bars for Concrete
Reinforcement. Stud welded bars should conform to ASTM Standard A-496, Specification for
Steel Wire, Deformed, for Concrete Reinforcement.
7. Prestressed concrete elements should be provided with mild steel reinforcement to resist
stresses resulting from seismic forces (including vertical) unless pretensioning is designed to
resist (ASCE 7-05, Table 12.2-1) times the calculated seismic forces.
A.3.3.4 Steel Structures
1. Design of steel structures should conform to the applicable requirements of 2006 IBC, Chapter
22, except as modified herein.
2. All moment resisting frames should be detailed in conformance with special moment frame
requirements of ANSI/AISC 341-05 and FEMA 350 (2000).
3. Hollow sections (tubes and pipes) used as diagonal braces with thinner walls than that required
by IBC 2006 may be utilized if the section is completely filled with cementitious material with unit
weight 110 pcf. The effect of the cementitious fill on section properties (area, section modulus,
moment of inertia, radius of gyration) should otherwise be neglected.
A.3.4 Foundations
Soil-foundation-interaction effects for massive structures should be considered in the evaluation of
foundations. A California-licensed geotechnical engineer should provide information regarding liquefaction
and other geotechnical hazards and appropriate mitigation measures as discussed in Section A.2.
Pile foundations should be designed to resist vertical and lateral loads within the acceptable displacement
limits. Consideration should be given to negative skin friction and group effects where applicable. Negative
skin friction is caused by soil settlement adjacent to the pile shaft. The settlement may be due to loading on
the soil around the piles or dissipation of excess pore water pressure subsequent to liquefaction.
A.3.5 Inspection Criteria
All buildings, building components and equipment necessary for the post-earthquake function of the facility
should be inspected during construction to assure that the construction meets the intent of the design.
Inspection of the completed facility should also be performed to assure that possible seismic interactions
between nearby components will not affect functionality of the facility.
A.3.6 References
ACI 1999, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete, American Concrete Institute, ACI 318
AISC 1989, Allowable Stress Design (ASD), Ninth edition, American Institute of Steel Construction,
Chicago, IL.
SDCWA Design Manual Appendix A. Supplemental Seismic Design Criteria
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE for Water Facilities
October 2007 A-14 REV 00
AISC 1993 Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD), Second edition, American Institute of Steel
Construction, Chicago, IL.
AISC 2005 Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings, American Institute of Steel Construction,
Chicago, IL.
AISC 2005 Steel Construction Manual, Thirteenth Edition, American Institute of Steel Construction,
Chicago, IL.
ASCE 2002, Seismic Evaluation of Existing Buildings, American Society of Civil Engineers,
ASCE31-02, New York, N.Y.
Diekmann, E.F., Diaphragms and Shear Walls, Chapter 8 from Wood Engineering and Construction
Handbook, 2nd Edition, Keith F. Flaherty and Thomas G. Williamson, editors, McGraw-Hill.
FEMA 2000, Recommended Seismic Criteria for New Steel Moment-Frame Buildings, Federal
Emergency Management Agency, FEMA 350, July 2000.
FEMA 2000b, Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Federal
Emergency Management Agency, FEMA 356, November 2000.
International Building Code, IBC 2006, by the International Code Council, Inc. (ICC).
FEMA 450, NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other
Structures, FEMA 450, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2003. Building Seismic Safety
Council.
A.4 Underground and Aboveground Piping
Facility Design Guide, Chapter 5, Table 5-3, provides a description of the characteristics of pipelines
associated with each Seismic Performance Class (SPC) described under Section 1.5 and Facility Design
Guide, Chapter 5, Table 5-1. Also shown in Facility Design Guide, Chapter 5, Table 5-3, is the equivalence
between SPC and Pipe Function Class (PFC) as provided in the Seismic Guidelines for Water Pipelines
prepared under the auspices of the American Lifelines Alliance (ALA, 2005). The ALA Guidelines may be
used as a reference document for design and Facility Design Guide, Chapter 5, Table 5-3, facilitates use of
the ALA Guidelines in this context. Reference to the ALA Guidelines in Appendix A is intended to provide
information that supplements the information available to and experience of the designer, and does not
relieve the designer from his/her own judgment, experience, and use of alternate design approaches.
Guidance regarding the principal sources and types of transient and permanent ground movements affecting
pipeline systems has been provided by ASCE (1984), ORourke (1998), and Bird, et al (2004). Seismic
hazards are grouped into transient and permanent ground deformation (TGD and PGD, respectively). For
lifeline systems, TGD includes the strong motion characteristics needed for structural and secondary system
response of buildings and aboveground facilities. It also includes factors that influence geographically
distributed networks, such as site response, near source and forward directivity effects of fault rupture,
sedimentary basin and valley effects, ridge shattering, and ground oscillation triggered by soil liquefaction.
The main sources of PGD include surface faulting, landslides, and soil liquefaction (ORourke, et al, 2004). It
has long been realized that the most serious damage to underground lifelines during an earthquake is
caused by PGD or at transition locations where pipes enter structures or bridges. A distinguishing feature of
designing buried pipelines for earthquakes is the emphasis that must be placed on PGD.
Failure Mechanisms
Underground pipeline systems have been damaged in past earthquakes. Failure of pipeline systems is a
significant problem. It can result in loss of pressure, reduction in quality of potable water, draining of local
reservoirs, significant infiltration in waste water systems, and for pressurized lines, substantial erosion
damage to adjacent land and improvements. The primary causes of underground piping failures are:
Ground failures. Liquefaction-induced lateral spreading and flow failure, as well as landslides, are among the
most damaging types of ground failure. Large deformation of the ground from these effects imposes
deformation on underground pipelines. Failures at points of weakness are common, including joints, tees, air
valves, hydrant laterals and similar fittings, as well as at connections to structures.
SDCWA Design Manual Appendix A. Supplemental Seismic Design Criteria
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE for Water Facilities
October 2007 A-15 REV 00
Fault ruptures. Underground pipelines that cross zones of fault rupture are subject to extensive damage.
Pipelines crossing fault rupture zones can be affected by abrupt shear, bending and longitudinal tension or
compression.
Differential settlement of soils, particularly adjacent to firm soils or structures founded on deep foundations.
Essentially, embedded pipelines will move with the surrounding soil. If one section of pipe moves due to
settlement while adjacent sections are prevented from displacement, either due to placement in firm soil or
attachment to settlement-resistant structures, damage will occur.
Rigid attachment to flexible structures. Underground pipelines frequently experience damage at connections
to tanks, buildings, basins, and similar facilities. This damage results from earthquake-induced differential
movement of the structure with respect to the ground. Differential movement can occur from sliding, rocking,
or flexing of the structure. The pipe, which is embedded in the ground, will attempt to act as an anchor for the
structure and can be severely damaged unless flexibility and/or ductility are provided in the connection.
Response to ground shaking. A pipeline embedded in the ground during an earthquake is subjected to
shearing, bending, compressive, and tensile forces associated with the waves transmitted by the ground.
These forces can occasionally lead to failure of weak, corroded or brittle pipeline components, or pipeline
joints vulnerable to pullout and/or compression.
Unrestrained joints. Bell and spigot joints with rubber gasketed, unwelded joints are common in certain
classes of ductile iron pipe, steel pipe, prestressed concrete cylinder pipe (PCCP), and other types of pipe in
the system. In areas of ground failure, complete pullout and detachment and of these joints can occur.
General Design Guidelines
Selection of Pipe Classification. Each pipeline requiring design consideration is classified as either SPC 1, 2,
or 3.
Pipelines not classified as SPC 1, 2, or 3 are equivalent to PFC 1 pipelines and need not be
designed for seismic provisions. All system pipelines are SPC-classified pipelines.
SPC 1 pipelines are normal and ordinary distribution pipelines, generally but not exclusively 6 to
10 in. in diameter. The purpose of such pipelines is for local distribution of water to housing tracts
and commercial users. Aqueducts are not SPC 1 or PFC 2 pipelines.
SPC 2 pipelines are critical pipelines serving a large number of member agencies that present
significant economic impact to the community or a substantial hazard to human life and property in
the event of failure. Some non-aqueduct pipelines, such as blowoff and flow control facility inlet
pipelines, may be classified as SPC 2 (PFC 3) pipelines.
SPC 3 pipelines are essential pipelines that are required for post-earthquake response and recovery
and intended to remain functional and operational during and following a design earthquake. All
aqueduct pipelines are classified as SPC 3 pipelines. Other types of pipelines may be classified as
SPC 3 as well.
Selection of ground shaking. For buried pipelines, the effect of ground shaking should be evaluated by
specifying the Peak Ground Velocity (PGV) along the length of the pipeline. The PGV should be set at the
475-year motion for SPC 1 pipelines, 975-year motion for SPC 2 pipelines, and the 2,475-year motion for
SPC 3 pipelines.
Selection of routing. The best way to minimize failure potential of underground piping is to avoid routes
through areas expected to experience either gross soil failures or ground fault rupture. During planning/initial
screening of possible alignments for a new pipeline or for the initial evaluation of the seismic vulnerability of
an existing pipeline, the locations of landslides hazards should be based on site-specific information. In
addition, the planning and design for all new major pipeline projects should include a geologic/geotechnical
reconnaissance of the proposed routing.
Bypass pipelines. Bypass pipeline systems can be used to accommodate large PGDs, such as fault offset,
as long as the time and resources involved to deploy such systems are considered satisfactory and
accounted for as part of the post-earthquake emergency response.
High seismic hazard areas. Any distribution or transmission pipeline of SPC 1, 2, or 3 that traverses a zone
of high to very high liquefaction potential, landslide potential (site specific), or fault offset at active faults,
SDCWA Design Manual Appendix A. Supplemental Seismic Design Criteria
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE for Water Facilities
October 2007 A-16 REV 00
should be designed to accommodate the ground deformation. Generally, this means that push-on joint pipes
(including Tyton and similar type joints) are not compliant with these criteria and should not be used for new
construction.
Transmission Pipelines
The general approach for seismic design of transmission water pipelines is as follows:
All transmission pipelines are classified as SPC3.
Establish the SPC for the pipeline (SPC 1, 2, or 3). Reduce the SPC as appropriate to account for
available redundancy of the water system. Only essential and non-redundant pipelines need be
classified as SPC 3.
Establish the PGV values for the pipeline (may vary spatially along the length of the pipeline) as
either the 475, 975, or 2,475-year return period per Selection of Ground Shaking above.
Using a combination of regional hazard maps, coupled with alignment-specific geotechnical hazard
studies, identify the portions of the alignment subject to PGDs (whether from liquefaction, landslide,
or active fault offset).
Select the pipe material, lining, and coating systems in a manner that reflects cost, reliability, and
seismic issues. In general, pipe joints should either be continuous (welded for steel, bolted for ductile
iron, fusion-welded for HDPE, etc.) or chained (limited expansion with full stop capability).
Segmented transmission pipelines (such as PCCP with push-on joints, ductile iron with push-on
joints, etc.) are vulnerable to PGD and very high levels of PGV and are not usually acceptable for
use in the transmission pipeline system.
Restrained joints are often used with steel pipe. These may be single lap welds, double lap welds, or
full butt welds. Single lap welds can accommodate modest amounts of settlement or lateral spread
PGD. Double lap welds can provide more tensile capability than that of single lap welds, but will
generally not provide significantly more compression capacity. Butt welds are preferred for active
fault offset designs.
When using thin-walled steel pipe (D/t ratios over 125), compression wrinkling of the pipe may be
the failure mode in any area subject to PGD. Through active fault zones, use D/t ratios under 100.
For pipes subject to significant compression due to PGD, the D/t ratio may be smaller (on the order
of 50 to 75), depending on the materials, local conditions, and extent of PGD.
For pipelines subject to PGD, the coating and lining systems must be chosen to accommodate the
soil loading and strains in the pipe. Ideally, the lining system should not fail in a manner to cause
downstream damage to pumps (such as cement lining) if the pipe is to sustain strains over 1%. The
coating system should be chosen to limit soil-pipe friction as needed for the design; yet still be robust
enough for corrosion protection and installation requirements.
When designing a new pipeline that will parallel an existing pipeline, the new pipeline should be
designed to accommodate failure of the old pipeline, in a rational and cost-effective manner. This
should factor in the type of soil bedding (e.g., sandy, cohensionless soils are more prone to erosion
than clayey soils) and the ability of the new pipeline to span moderate distances if undermining from
failure of the existing should pipeline occur.
Special purpose hardware, such as EBAA Flex-Tend flexible expansion joints, can provide about
12 in. of pipe movement when the pipe is located above ground. This type of hardware has not been
engineered or qualified to take major fault offset for buried pipelines. Reliance on manufacturer-
stated claims as to the capability of such hardware should not relieve the Design Contractor from
verifying that the actual hardware will perform as intended in buried conditions, considering each
part of the manufacturer-supplied assembly, the soil-pipe friction, and the worst combination of fault
offset (angle, width of zone, knife edge or distributed) suitable for the specific crossing.
If suitable emergency response capability exists, and depending on the importance of the
transmission pipeline, a transmission pipeline may be allowed to break in an earthquake, as long as
the goals of Appendix A are maintained. It may be possible with a portable aboveground hose, as
well as suitable pipeline valves and manifolds, to restore water service in smaller communities
(served population under 20,000 people or so) within a suitable amount of time after an earthquake,
SDCWA Design Manual Appendix A. Supplemental Seismic Design Criteria
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE for Water Facilities
October 2007 A-17 REV 00
excluding high fire risk zones. For communities in high fire risk zones, there should be available
water (reliably available from either pipes/pumps or from local storage) to last for about 24 hours
post-earthquake. Fire service is provided by local water distribution companies.
Any transmission pipeline (whether new or existing) that traverses a zone with highly likely PGDs
(either landslide, liquefaction or active fault offset) that is likely to break given the PGD, should be
designed/retrofitted so that its failure does not grossly impact the ability to deliver fire flows to
unaffected parts of the community in the same pressure zone. This is commonly achieved by
installing suitable isolation valves on both sides of the PGD zone.
Earthquakes will introduce hydrodynamic loading in pipelines. ALA (2005) provides a simplified method to
estimate the extent of this hydrodynamic loading. For transmission pipes with low hydrostatic pressures
(much under 50 psi), with wall thicknesses and girth joints chosen to meet just the minimum hydrostatic
internal pressure, the incremental hydrodynamic loading from earthquakes may be controlling and might lead
to pulling apart of push on joints near pipe bends, or pin hole leaks in thin-walled pipe (especially if wall
thickness has been reduced due to corrosion). All transmission pipelines should be designed with suitable
capability at bends to withstand pullout of joints due to earthquake-induced hydrodynamic loads; this can
normally be accomplished with suitable tension joints near bends for segmented pipe, or using suitable
reaction blocks. For low-pressure pipelines (below 25 psi internal pressure), hydrostatic plus earthquake-
induced hydrodynamic loads may control the selection of the wall thickness and girth joints of the pipe; for
this load combination, the combined hoop stresses should be kept under yield, and the combined thrust
loads at bends must not pull apart the joints.
Distribution Pipelines
In general, the system has no distribution pipelines. However, small diameter (under 12-inch) pipelines at
facilities (water treatment plants, turnouts, blow offs) that are not exposed to PGDs or differential movements
at soil-to-structure interfaces can be designed for seismic loading using methods suitable for distribution
pipelines. For most distribution pipe installations, seismic design following the chart methods in ALA may be
used. When following the ALA chart method, the following major steps should be followed:
Establish the design level ground motion (PGV) for the pipeline. The recommended basis for design
is a PGV with a 475-year-return-period per ALA.
Establish the design level permanent ground deformation (PGD) for the pipeline. PGDs may occur
due to liquefaction (settlement and/or lateral spread); landslide or surface fault offset.
For distribution pipelines (PFC 2) with PGV30 inches per second, and not subject to PGD, no
special seismic design is required, and the design should follow standard AWWA and other
requirements.
For distribution pipelines (PFC 2) with PGV>30 inches per second, and not subject to PGD, the
design should follow standard AWWA and other requirements, but with extra valves (isolation valves
at each branch at a pipe intersection, and no more than about 500 feet between valves or the
distance needed to sectionalize the pipe to limit service disruptions).
For PFC 2, 3, and IV pipelines with 0 < PGD 2 inches, and PGV 30 inches/second no special
seismic design is required.
For PFC 2, 3, and IV pipelines with PGD > 2 inches, including those used for hydrant laterals, blow offs, air
and vacuum release valves, service laterals and service connections, special seismic design is required.
ALA 2005 provides these design provisions for seven types of pipe: ductile iron, PVC, welded steel,
gasketed steel, concrete cylinder, HDPE, and copper pipe. Depending on the magnitude and orientation of
the PGD and the classification of the pipe, different pipe designs are recommended in ALA 2002.
Fault Crossing Design Guidelines
For PFC 1 pipelines, fault rupture does not need to be considered. For PFC 2 pipelines, the fault rupture
should have a return period of 475 years and for PFC 3 or IV pipelines, the fault rupture should have a return
period of 975 years.
Empirical models such as Wells and Coppersmith (1994) can be used to compute the median value of the
average displacement. If site-specific information is available on the amplitude of the fault rupture in past
earthquakes, this can be used in place of the empirical models.
SDCWA Design Manual Appendix A. Supplemental Seismic Design Criteria
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE for Water Facilities
October 2007 A-18 REV 00
New installations of PFC 2, 3 or IV pipelines that traverse active faults should consider the following
provisions:
An assessment should be made of the area served by the new pipeline, as well as by existing
pipelines. If the area served does not have a reliable source of water for fire fighting, available within
8 hours following a major earthquake and capable of lasting for at least 24 hours following a major
earthquake, then a fault crossing design should be used for the new pipeline.
Fault crossing designs are of three basic types:
o (a) avoid crossing the fault, if practical;
o (b) design the pipe to accommodate fault offset without failure of the pressure boundary, and;
o (c) provide suitable valves and manifolds and bypass pipe to allow rapid restoration of water
service across the fault zone, should the pipe break at the fault. A combination of (b) and (c)
may be suitable in some instances.
The pipeline route should be configured, whenever practical, so as to cause net tension in the pipe
given the fault offset. If a butt welded steel pipeline system is used, maximum strains should be no
higher than 5% given the occurrence of a characteristic earthquake.
Pipelines that are designed per (c) should include suitable in-line valves on both sides of the fault
zone, spaced far enough apart so as not to significantly increase the chance of failure of the pipe
due to fault offset. The in-line valves may be manually (could be done by remote actuation) or
automatically actuated. Automatic actuation valves are required if the failure of the pipeline at the
fault offset will credibly cause a life safety concern to nearby people or cause enough erosion as to
create a significant loss to nearby facilities. Automatic actuation should be based on instrumentation
that senses whether the pipeline actually has broken, such as by sudden drops in pressure and
increased flow, coupled with very high levels of peak ground acceleration (PGA over 0.3g). Remote
operation of any automatic actuation valve may be desirable. Any actuation system should be
capable of operating without reliance on the standard electrical supply system for at least one full
close-and-open cycle.
Pipelines that are provided with design feature (c), but not (b), should include suitable sized bypass
manifolds. The bypass manifolds should be sized to accommodate the maximum of (i) 1,000 gpm
flow, (ii) the required fire flow, or (iii) the winter day demand for the area served by this pipeline.
Suitable aboveground pipelines (flex hose or pipe) should be available to be installed within 8 hours
following a major earthquake, to restore fire flows to the area, in conjunction with a suitable
emergency response and recovery plan.
The type of fault crossing design adopted for a new pipeline (a, b, or c) should recognize all of the
seismic hazards for the area to be served by this pipeline. For example, a fault crossing design will
not be effective if the pipe is also likely to fail due to landslide or liquefaction hazards. The design of
the area considered should be governed by the pressure zone hydraulics and geotechnical hazards
of the pipe system serving the area.
Small-diameter distribution pipelines (10-in.-diameter and less) need not be designed per options (a),
(b), or (c), i.e., no special fault crossing design, if breakage of the distribution pipeline due to fault offset
does not materially impact the post-earthquake performance of the distribution system. In these cases,
gate valves can be included on the distribution pipelines within 200 ft either side of the fault zone, with
hydrants located just outside these gate valves.
Aboveground Piping, Conduit, Cable Trays, and HVAC Ducts
Newly installed piping, conduit, cable trays, and HVAC ducts should at a minimum, be provided with braces
that satisfy SMACNA (Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning Contractors National Association) requirements for
Seismic Hazard Level A (the highest hazard level) unless demonstrated capable of resisting the required
seismic forces under other support conditions. Existing pipeline, conduit, cable trays, and HVAC ducts
should be capable of reasonably surviving the design earthquake and adequately reliable to meet the Level
of Service Goals.
SMACNA 1998, Seismic Restraint Manual Guidelines for Mechanical Systems, Sheet Metal and Air
Conditioning Contractors National Association, Inc., 1998.
SDCWA Design Manual Appendix A. Supplemental Seismic Design Criteria
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE for Water Facilities
October 2007 A-19 REV 00
Connection Level 1 (corresponds to approved research report values) should be used for structures of all
importance levels. For pipes larger than those covered in the SMACNA document, design loads should be
based on this Standard. In all cases, pipes should be checked for buckling at supports under seismic
loading.
Plastic piping should be braced laterally at intervals not exceeding twice that recommended by the
manufacturer for vertical support.
Piping crossing expansion joints between adjacent structures should be provided with expansion fittings,
multiple bends, or other suitable provisions to ensure capacity to sustain expected differential movement
between the structures.
Piping systems connected to tanks and vessels should consider the potential movement of the connection
points during earthquakes and provide sufficient flexibility to avoid failure of the piping system.
Piping system and supports should be designed so as to not impart significant mechanical loading on the
attachment to the tank or vessel shell. Local loads at piping connections should be considered in the design
of the tank or vessel shell. Mechanical devices that add flexibility, such as bellows, expansion joints, and
other flexible apparatus, may be used when they are designed for seismic loads and displacements.
Seismic effects that should be considered in the design of a piping system include the dynamic effects of the
piping system, its contents, and when appropriate, its supports. The interaction between the piping system
and the supporting structures, including other mechanical and electrical equipment, also should be
considered.
Piping should be designed to minimize the impact into other pipes or components if such impact will likely
damage the pipe or components in a manner so as to create a loss of functionality.
Special care should be taken to ensure that small branch lines off piping headers do not, by virtue of their
attachment to structures or equipment, act as the brace for the header unless demonstrated by calculation to
have suitable capacity for this service.
Existing piping should be capable of reasonably surviving the design earthquake without collapse. Addition
of lateral braces for such commodities should only be necessary if the engineer verifies that such lateral
braces will materially lower the pipe (conduit/duct/cable tray) stresses or forces to below the pipes
(conduit/duct /cable tray) capacity or otherwise increase the pipes (conduit/duct/cable tray) reliability to be
immediately functional post-earthquake.
Piping Passing Through or Below Bodies of Water
Piping passing through bodies of water (e.g., reservoirs, creeks, rivers, bays, etc.) should be evaluated for
internal and external hydrodynamic effects and the effects of saturated soils with regard to interaction with
piping systems. Consideration should be given to both the effort of support provided to piping and loading
resisted by piping for such conditions.
Pipes that cross below bodies of water should also be checked for scour forces, as well as all other loads
described elsewhere in Appendix A. If scour is possible, then the pipe should be suitably protected. If the
soils at the crossing zone are subject to liquefaction, then these effects will be considered in the design of
the pipe.
A.5 Soil Retaining Structures
Soil retaining structures, such as retaining walls and U-walls, should be designed for appropriate static and
seismic soil pressure depending on the restraining conditions of the wall. For yielding walls, active soil
pressure may be used for design. The incremental seismic load should be obtained by the Mononobe-Okabe
method as modified in the following reference:
Seed, M. B. and R. V. Whitman, 1970, Design of Earth Retention Structures for Dynamic Loads, ASCE
Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, June 1970.
For gravity retaining walls, the methods described in the following reference may be used to determine the
seismic soil pressures:
Whitman, R. V. (1990) Seismic design and behavior of gravity retaining walls, Design & Performance of
Earth Retaining Structures, ASCE, P.C. Lambe and L.A. Hansen eds., Ithaca, NY, pp. 817-842.
SDCWA Design Manual Appendix A. Supplemental Seismic Design Criteria
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE for Water Facilities
October 2007 A-20 REV 00
For non-yielding walls, at-rest soil pressure should be considered for static loading. Seismic soil pressure
may be obtained from methods used in ASCE 4-98 or the method given in the following reference:
Ostadan, F., Seismic Soil Pressure for Building Walls an Updated Approach, Proceedings 11
th
International Conference on Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering and 3
rd
International
Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Berkeley, CA, pp. 68-73.
Where applicable, the effects of hydrodynamic loads should be considered in the design.
A complete discussion of various methods to evaluate seismic soil pressure and hydrodynamic loads is
presented in the following:
Ebeling et al., The Seismic Design of Waterfront Retaining Structures, Department of the Army,
Waterway Experiment Station, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, technical report ITL-92-11.
A.6 Underground Structures
A.6.1 Bored and Cut and Cover Tunnels
A.6.1.1 Seismic Response
Seismic responses of aboveground structures are primarily force controlled. On the other hand, seismic
responses of underground structures are controlled by ground deformation related to ground motions and/or
fault rupture. In general, tunnels and cut and cover structures perform satisfactorily in response to strong
ground shaking. Exceptions to this performance history have been observed for deep structures subject to
significant amplification of ground motions over the height of the structure and/or unaccounted for additional
ground loads resulting from soil liquefaction. Depending on the stiffness of the structure and the stiffness of
the soil excavated to build the structure, deformation of the structure may be larger or smaller than the free-
field ground deformation. For such structures, soil-structure interaction (SSI) analysis should be performed to
obtain seismic response of the structure. Depending on the structure layout and dimensions, two- or three-
dimensional SSI analysis can be performed. For tunnels and cut-and-cover structures, the techniques
proposed in the following references may be used:
Hashash, Y.M.A., J.J. Hook, B. Schmidt, and J.I.-C. Yao, Seismic design and analysis of underground
structure. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology, 2001. 16: 247-293.
Penzien, J. 2000, Seismically Induced Racking of Tunnel Linings, Earthquake Engineering and
Structural Dynamics, Vol. 29, 2000.
Wang, Jaw-Nah, 1993, Seismic Design of TunnelsA Simple State-of-the-Art Design Approach,
Monograph 7, Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc., June 1993.
For cut-and-cover structures, a viable technique is provided in the following reference:
Ostadan and Penzien, 2001, Seismic Design of Cut-and-Cover Sections of the Bay Area Rapid Transit
Extension to San Francisco, Airport, 2
nd
U.S.-Japan SSI Workshop on Soil-Structure Interaction,
Tsukuba, Japan.
Such techniques permit development of an optimal design that would conform to the ground deformation
without attracting large seismic loads, yet satisfying the performance level. Using the force method, such as
using seismic soil pressure, may amount to a rigid design that would, in fact, attract larger seismic loads and
amount to an inefficient design. Depending on the structure and its contents, fully dynamic soil-structure
interaction or quasi-static structure interaction may be used. The generic racking curves provided in the
above references may also be used if it can be shown that they are applicable to the structure under
consideration.
A.6.1.2 Detailing Requirements
Detailing of embedded concrete structures should conform to that required by IBC 2006, Section 1907, and
in Appendix A. All dowels across construction joints should be fully developed by embedment or mechanical
anchorage on either side of the joint.
A.6.1.3 Fault Crossing Guidelines
If possible, new tunnels should be aligned so that they do not cross active or potentially active strands of
faults having slip rates much in excess of 1 mm per year. When a tunnel must be placed across a primary
SDCWA Design Manual Appendix A. Supplemental Seismic Design Criteria
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE for Water Facilities
October 2007 A-21 REV 00
active fault, it should be designed with the recognition that surface faulting or folding may occur. Surface
rupture characteristics to be considered include the amount and direction of primary fault displacement, as
well as the amount, type, and distribution of secondary deformation associated with the surface fault rupture.
A.6.1.4 Retrofit of Existing Tunnels
Existing tunnels should be investigated using procedures of A.6.1.1 and should include assessment of
impacts due to fault crossings. Where fault crossings occur, analysis methods including effects or soil
structure interaction and evaluation of performance at fault crossings is subject to independent peer review.
Such peer review should as a minimum include both structural engineering and geotechnical engineering
disciplines.
New construction for retrofit where fault crossings occur should be fully compliant with requirements for new
construction.
A.6.2 Valve Vaults and Similar Structures
A.6.2.1 Firm Soil Sites
Past earthquakes have not caused extensive damage to building walls below grade. In some cases, however, it may
be advisable to verify the adequacy of retaining walls to resist increased pressure due to seismic loading. These
situations might be for walls of poor construction quality, unreinforced or lightly reinforced walls, walls of archaic
materials, unusually tall or thin walls, damaged walls, or other conditions implying a sensitivity to increased loads.
The seismic earth pressure acting on a wall retaining non-saturated, level soil above the groundwater table
may be approximated as:
p k I H
h s rw
= 04 .
[Equation 5-1]
where Additional earth pressure due to seismic shaking, which may be assumed to be
a uniform
pressure over the height of the wall.
p =
k
h
=
Horizontal seismic coefficient in the soil, which may be assumed to be equal to the site horizontal PGA.
I = I-Factor as suitable for this structure from Facility Design Guide, Chapter 5, Table 5-1.
s
= The total unit saturated weight of the soil
H
rw
= The height of the wall that is retaining the soil
The seismic earth pressure given by Equation 5-1 should be added to the unfactored static earth pressure to
obtain the total earth pressure on the wall. The expression in Equation 5-1 is a conservative approximation of
the Seed and Whitman simplified formulation based on the Mononabe-Okabe solution (Seed and Whitman,
1970). The pressure on walls during earthquakes is a complex action. If walls do not have the apparent
capacity to resist the pressures estimated from the above approximate procedures, or further detail for site
specific conditions is warranted than provided by Equation 5-1, detailed investigation by a California-licensed
geotechnical engineer is recommended.
In addition to designing walls of the structures for the increased pressures indicated above, the structure as
a whole should be designed to resist sliding as a result of such pressures. Sliding may be resisted by a
combination of friction beneath the base of the structure and by soil bearing against the opposite wall of the
structure, if embedded. Such pressures may be assumed to have a triangular pressure distribution, with the
resultant located at 1/3 the depth of the backfill above the base of the structure on the resisting side. If
excessive movement that could functionally damage the structure is needed to mobilize the full passive
resistance of soil bearing against the walls, then only a portion of the passive pressure resistance should be
relied upon.
A.6.2.2 Soft Soil Sites and Liquefiable Sites
Important and standard structures (SPC 1 or 2) embedded in soils subject to liquefaction, or in unconfined
silts, poorly consolidated clays or other soft materials, should be designed for the most severe of the
following two conditions:
SDCWA Design Manual Appendix A. Supplemental Seismic Design Criteria
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE for Water Facilities
October 2007 A-22 REV 00
At-rest earth pressures (depending on condition of restraint) acting on all sides of the structure, together
with the seismic earth pressure of Equation 5-1 acting on one side of the structure.
For soils predicted to liquefy, static pressures due to liquefied soil acting on all sides of the structure.
Critical structures (SPC 3) embedded in these soils should be designed for dynamic earth pressures based on
site specific geotechnical investigation.
All embedded structures located on sites subjected to liquefaction should be investigated for potential buoyant
effects.
A.6.2.3 Detailing
Detailing of embedded structures should conform to that required by IBC 2006 and Appendix A. All dowels across
construction joints in embedded structures should be fully developed by embedment or mechanical anchorage on
either side of the joint.
A.7 Water Retention Structures
A.7.1 Steel Tanks
New steel tanks should be anchored and provided with fixed steel roofs. The tanks should be designed in
accordance with the latest edition of AWWA D-100, including the modifications herein.
Tanks should be anchored and have fixed steel or aluminum roofs.
Tanks should be designated as either Important or Critical facilities.
The use factor, I, should be taken from the Facility Design Guide, Chapter 5, Table 5-1.
The zone coefficient, Z, should be replaced by a suitable PGA value from a site specific ground
motion. The site amplification factors, S, should be taken as 1.0, unless a site investigation finds that
the site is not likely to be characterized as a rock site. In this case, S may be taken from Table 27 of
AWWA D100 or a site specific ground motion spectra may be developed to establish the PGA for the
site, in consideration of local soil conditions.
A site specific response spectrum may be used to characterize local seismic conditions (D100-96,
sections 13.3.3.2.3 and 13.4; and/or D103-97, sections 12.3.2.3 and 12.4) with the following
modification:
The mean recurrence interval should be 475 years (10% probability of exceedance in 50 years)
and the reduction factor R
F
should be R
W
.
Design should include vertical earthquake acceleration effects wherever indicated in D100-96 or
D103-97. The vertical stress in the tank shell should include vertical acceleration effects. Shell
buckling should be checked by increasing the weight of the tank shell and the tributary roof on the
shell by the vertical acceleration.
Anchor bolts should be spaced equally around the circumference of the tank. Bolts should be
designed for a tensile load using AWWA methods (D100-96, equation 13-19; and/or D103-97,
equation 27) except that the dead load should be reduced by the vertical acceleration. Maximum
spacing of anchor bolts should be 20 feet. Each tank over 100,000 gallons should have a minimum
of 12 bolts. Minimum size of anchor bolts is 0.75 inch diameter. Threads in anchor bolts will be
designed such that failure of the bolt in the threads does not occur before general yielding up to 2%
strain in the bolt.
Attachments of anchor bolts to tank shell and embedment in footing should be capable of developing
the tension yield force of the bolt.
The effect of internal liquid pressure should not be used to increase permissible buckling stresses on
the shell for unanchored tanks, as permitted by D100-96, Section 13.3.3.7.4.
Critical piping connected to sides of tanks should be designed to accommodate 2 inches of uplift
movement of the tank shell without severe damage or uncontrolled loss of contents. This amount of
movement may be increased if the tank is unanchored or if the available anchorage system might
still allow some amount of uplift under the design earthquake, when evaluated using R
w
= 1. It is
SDCWA Design Manual Appendix A. Supplemental Seismic Design Criteria
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE for Water Facilities
October 2007 A-23 REV 00
preferable that piping connected to the floor of the tank be located outside the zone of uplift identified
by D100-96 (or D103-97) for unanchored tanks. If this is not possible, piping connected to the floor
of the tank, which is within the uplift zone (of an equivalent unanchored tank), should be designed
assuming that 2 inches of uplift occurs at the tank wall (12 inches if the tank is unanchored).
Frictional resistance should not be used to reduce the unbraced distance in designing roof members
as permitted by D100-96, Section 3.6.
Interior columns supporting the roof should be designed with a maximum slenderness ratio
(length/radius of gyration) of 120 instead of 175 as permitted by D100-96, Section 3.4.
In addition to the requirements of D100 (or D103), tank foundations should be designed to resist
sliding and overturning due to seismic forces. The overall stability against sliding and overturning
should be achieved with a minimum safety factor of 1.1 (sliding) or 1.5 (overturning) or greater.
Vertical accelerations need not be included in the calculation of overall sliding and overturning
stability. The one-third increase in allowable stress permitted in D100-96 applies only to soil bearing
stresses under the combined maximum load case of seismic and gravity loads acting
simultaneously.
A. Base Shear and Overturning Moment
In lieu of AWWA Equations 13-4 and 13-8 for calculation of base shear and overturning moment, substitute
the following:
( ) V
S I
R
W W W S IW
ai
w
s r ac
= + + +
1 2
[equation 5-2]
( ) M
S I
R
W X W H W X
S I
W X
ai
w
s s r t
ac
= + + +
1 1 2 2
1
[equation 5-3]
where should be taken as 4.2.
R
w
S
ai
= spectral acceleration of the first impulsive mode at 2% damping. Higher damping can be used if
justified based on tank-specific analysis. This may be appropriate for soil sites.
S
ac
=
spectral acceleration of the first convective mode, at 0.5% damping
W
s
=
weight of tank shell, lbs
X
s
= height from bottom of tank shell to the center of gravity of the shell, ft
W
r
=
weight of the tank roof plus permanent loads if any, lbs
H
t
=
total height of tank shell, ft
W
1
= weight of effective mass of tank contents that moves in unison with the tank shell per AWWA D-100
Sec. 13.3.3.2 lbs
X
1
= height from the bottom of the tank to the centroid of lateral force applied to
per AWWA D-100 Sec. 13.3.3.2 ft W
1
W
2
=
weight of effective mass of tank contents that moves in the first sloshing mode, per AWWA D-100
Sec. 13.3.3.2 lbs
X
2
=
height from the bottom of the tank shell to the centroid of lateral force applied to W per AWWA D-
100 Sec. 13.3.3.2 ft
2
S
ai
and are the spectral accelerations of the first impulsive and convective (sloshing) modes, using site
specific response spectra with 2% and 0.5% damping, respectively. The period for the impulsive mode may
be calculated using Equation 7-52 and Figure 7.18 of (ASCE, 1984). It can be determined from the
S
ac
SDCWA Design Manual Appendix A. Supplemental Seismic Design Criteria
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE for Water Facilities
October 2007 A-24 REV 00
site-specific or IBC default response spectra adjusted for 2% damping. For a steel tank containing water, the
equation for the period for the impulsive mode is as follows:
T
H
C
i
w
=
2640
[Equation 5-4]
where
C
is obtained from Figure 7-18 of (ASCE, 1984).
w
In lieu of calculating the period for the impulsive mode, may conservatively be taken as the peak
response acceleration on the site-specific response spectrum.
S
ai
The period of the convective mode should be calculated in accordance with AWWA D-100, Equation 13-7.
Where a site specific response spectrum curve has not been developed for the site, may be taken as:
S
ac
S
ac
= PGA*C
s
[Equation 5-5]
where
C
S
T
whenT
S
T
whenT
s
w
w
w
w
= <
=
3
45
135
45
2
.
.
.
seconds
C seconds
s
[Equation 5-6]
Note that the base shear and overturning moment determined by Equations 5-2 and 5-3 is that applied to the
shell. The effects of the weight of the bottom of the tank shell should be included in a rational manner. The
tank foundation is subjected to an additional moment due to the lateral displacement of the tanks contents as
discussed in (Wozniak and Mitchell). This may need to be considered in the design of some foundations
such as pile-supported concrete or slabs.
B. Hydrodynamic Seismic Hoop Tensile Stress
Seismic hoop tensile stress should be determined in accordance with AWWA D-100, Equations 13-21 to
13-24, (D103-97, equations 28 to 33) as modified herein. Vertical acceleration should factor in the
considerations in Section A.2.4.3.
when D/H > = 1.33:
N
S
R
IGDH
Y
H
Y
H
D
H
i
ai
w
=
45
05 0866
2
.
. tanh .
[Equation 5-7]
when D/H < 1.33 and Y < 0.75D:
N
S
R
IGD
Y
D
Y
D
i
ai
w
=
28
075
05
075
2
2
.
.
.
.
[Equation 5-8]
when D/H < 1.33 and Y> = 0.75D:
N
S
R
IGD
i
ai
w
=
14
2
.
[Equation 5-9]
SDCWA Design Manual Appendix A. Supplemental Seismic Design Criteria
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE for Water Facilities
October 2007 A-25 REV 00
For all values of D/H:
N S
IGD
H Y
D
H
D
c ac
=
2
368
368
cosh .
cosh .
[Equation 5-10]
C. Freeboard and Roof Design
Tanks should be designed with freeboard above the upper range of the normal operating liquid level as
follows:
d DS
ac
= 042 . I
f
f
[Equation 5-11]
If the available freeboard is less then d, then the roof system should be designed to resist the impact from
the sloshing liquid.
A.7.2 Prestressed Concrete Tanks
Prestressed concrete tanks should be designed in accordance with the latest edition of AWWA D110 as
modified by Appendix A.
A. Base Connection
Tanks should be designed with either a reinforced, non-sliding, fixed base (type A.2.l(a), Figure 4A) or
anchored flexible base (type A.2.l(b), Figure 4B) as defined in AWWA D110.
Anchorage between the tank shell and floor, should be designed to resist base shear and overturning
moment V and M calculated in accordance with Equations 5-2 and 5-3 with the coefficient R
w
taken as 4.5
for a flexible anchored base, and 2.75 for a fixed base.
Anchorage between the tank shell and floor, consisting of embedded dowels or prestressing cable should be
designed to resist a base shear force V using equation 5-2.
Base shear should be resisted entirely by shear friction, calculated in accordance with ACI 318, or by use of
seismic cables.
Bearing pads and water seals in tanks with type A.2.1(b) flexible anchored base should be designed to
withstand the displacement resulting from the base shear calculated in accordance with Equation 5-2 using
R
w
= 1.2. A higher value of R
w
may be used if it can be justified that the bearing pads will remain leak tight
while accommodating the total nonlinear-calculated displacements of the structure in the design basis
earthquake.
In addition to the effects of horizontal acceleration, tanks and their foundations should be designed to resist
the effects of vertical acceleration as indicated in Section A.2.4.3. The combined effects of vertical and
horizontal accelerations may be combined by the root sum of the squares method.
Foundations for tanks should be designed to resist the total overturning and shear effects resulting from the
forces and moments calculated as follows:
V V S W
f ai
= + [Equation 5-12]
M M V H
f f
= + [Equation 5-13]
Steel reinforcement and anchor cables provided at the base of tanks should be fully embedded on both sides
of the base joints to permit the development of the full yield strength of the steel.
B. Roof Connection
Wall-to-roof connections should be either flexibly or rigidly tied, with positive mechanical anchorage in the
form of dowels, tension cables, or other suitable devices. Unrestrained, free joints are not permitted.
C. Hydrodynamic Seismic Hoop Tensile Stress
SDCWA Design Manual Appendix A. Supplemental Seismic Design Criteria
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE for Water Facilities
October 2007 A-26 REV 00
In lieu of the equations given in AWWA D110, circumferential stresses
i
and
c
should
be calculated by replacing Z with the site specific PGA. I should be based on Facility Design Guide, Chapter
5, Table 5-1. Designs should include provision for steel reinforcement to carry 100% of the circumferential
tensile stresses due to seismic accelerations.
N N
D. Cover
A minimum of 2 inches of cover should be provided over prestressing wires for fire protection of tanks
located in high fire hazard areas or any tank with appreciable fuel load located within 10 feet of the outside
wall surface of the tank.
E. Backfill
The beneficial effects of backfill against the wall of a tank with respect to sliding resistance may be
considered if the fill is engineered and a geotechnical report is provided that provides appropriate passive
pressure values to be used. In order to consider the beneficial effects, the backfill must be provided around
the entire perimeter of the tank. If backfill height varies, only beneficial effects of minimum height should be
used.
A.7.3 Water Retention Basins
Open roofed, water retention basins should be designed in accordance with the latest edition of ACI 350.
Circular basins should be designed for seismic forces calculated in accordance with Section A.7.2.
Rectangular basins and their foundations, should be designed by combining earthquake forces aligned with
each principal axis of the basin using the square root of the sum of the squares method.
The base shear and overturning moments resulting from seismic response in each direction should
be separately calculated using the procedures of Section A.7.2, except that the length of the basin in
the direction under consideration should be substituted for the diameter D in all equations.
The coefficient R
w
should be taken as 4.0.
In addition to hydrostatic forces, retained earth static and seismic forces, and any other applied
loadings, end walls of rectangular basins should be designed to resist earth pressures as
determined using the procedures in Section A.6.
Division walls in retention basins and reservoirs should be designed as end walls of individual basins having
an adjusted dimension D equal to the distance between adjacent walls. For this purpose, the weights of
fluid active in the impulsive and convective modes (W
1
, W
2
) should be calculated as if for a tank of adjusted
dimension D. Unbalanced hydrostatic forces resulting from different liquid levels, including one basin
empty, should be accounted for.
The sanitary durability coefficient of ACI 350 need not be used in conjunction with the design basis
earthquake load case.
Structures that cover open water retention basins where the water within may be required for fire flows
should be designed with a maximum R value of 3. Portions of roof structures that provide access to or
provide support for valve operators that may be required to be operated immediately after an earthquake
should be designed with a maximum R value of 2.2.
Liners should be designed to not leak excessively or in a manner as to be unrepairable within 30 days after a
major earthquake.
Embankments not otherwise covered by DSOD should be designed to withstand a 475 year earthquake
(increased by I=1.25 or I=1.5) with at least 3 inches of freeboard available.
A.7.4 Internal Structures
This section applies to all internal components (including mechanical equipment) and structures within
reservoirs and water retention structures including roof support structures, piping, ladders, paddles, agitator
shafts, and similar items. It is based on a research report by (Cambra), but has been simplified and modified.
SDCWA Design Manual Appendix A. Supplemental Seismic Design Criteria
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE for Water Facilities
October 2007 A-27 REV 00
In addition to other loads, resulting from self weight, operating forces, etc., internals should be designed to
resist a uniform seismic lateral force per unit height of internal structures as follows:
( )
f
C I w w f
R
p
a p w w
w
=
+ + 25 .
[Equation 5-14]
where R
w
is taken as appropriate from Table A-1, and:
( f
g
D D u C uu
w c c d
= +
075 .
$
)
[Equation 5-15]
( )
u S T g
H Y
D
H
D
r
D
t
T
ac w
i
w
=
+
077
368
368
05
2 2
2
2
.
cosh
.
cosh
.
. cos
[Equation 5-16]
( )
$ .
cosh
.
cosh
.
. sin u S g
H Y
D
H
D
r
D
t
T
ac
i
w
=
+
154
368
368
05
2 2
2
2
[Equation 5-17]
and terms are as shown in Figure A-3.
Figure A-3. Internal Components of Tanks and Basins
The expressions given by Equations 5-15, 5-16 and 5-17 must be evaluated at several locations along the
height of the submerged object, to obtain a distribution of hydrodynamic force along the length of the object for
design purposes. In order to maximize the force f
w
, its value must be evaluated at different values of time t. As
a conservative approximation, the cos term in Equation 5-16 may be set to +1 and the sin term in Equation 5-
17 may be set to 1.
When the submerged object is vertical, rises the full height of the tank, and is of uniform cross section, the
hydrodynamic force on the submerged object may be approximated as a uniform load over the height of the
component as follows:
( f
DD T S
r
D
H
H
D
B B
w
c w ac
=
+
0157 05
2
368
2
2
1
2
2
2
05
. .
cosh
.
.
)
[equation 5-18]
SDCWA Design Manual Appendix A. Supplemental Seismic Design Criteria
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE for Water Facilities
October 2007 A-28 REV 00
where:
B D
H
D
T
c
w
1
2
2
368
=
sinh
.
[equation 5-19]
B T C S g
H
D
H
D
H
D
r
D
w d ac 2
2
2
0193
736
736
368
05
2
=
+
.
sinh
.
.
cosh
.
.
[equation 5-20]
The above assumes that the internal component is totally or nearly totally immersed in the fluid. In the case
of components that have significant length projecting out of the fluid, the above may be overly conservative,
and it may be more appropriate to assume that the uniform load f
p
in Equation 5-14 is applied over the
portion of the component immersed in the fluid plus the slosh height given in Equation 5-11.
Components located just above fluid surfaces may be subject to damage due to sloshing and should be
investigated by rational methods.
SDCWA Design Manual Appendix A. Supplemental Seismic Design Criteria
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE for Water Facilities
October 2007 A-29 REV 00
Table A-1: R
w
Coefficients for Submerged Components
Component R
w
Structural columns with axial stress ratio fa/Fa < 0.15 8
Structural columns with axial stress ratio fa/Fa > = 0.15 and < 0.4 6
Structural columns with axial stress ratio fa/Fa > = 0.4 3
Welded steel pipe (welds as strong as the pipe, for example butt welds) 8
Other pipe 6
Ladders, davits, similar appurtenances 6
Baffles 8
Launders 3
Rotating parts, scrapers 3
Other Reservoir Systems
Redwood tanks should not be used for new installations unless established that they are as reliable as
comparable steel tanks.
Concrete tanks may be designed per ACI 350.
Roofs and valve works for open cut lined reservoirs should be designed as defined elsewhere in Appendix A.
A.7.5 References
ASCE, Guidelines for the Seismic Design of Oil and Gas Pipeline Systems, Committee on Gas and
Liquid Fuel Lifelines of the ASCE Technical Council on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering, American
Society of Civil Engineers, 1984.
ACI 1989, Reinforced Concrete Water Retention Structures Environmental Engineering Concrete
Structures, ACI 350-R89, American Concrete Institute.
AWWA 1995, Prestressed Concrete Tanks Wire- and Strand-Wound Circular, Prestressed
Concrete Water Tanks, ANSI/AWWA D110-95, (including Addendum AWWA D110a-96), American
Water Works Association.
AWWA 1996, Welded Steel Water Tanks Welded Steel Tanks for Water Storage, ANSI/AWWA
D100-96, American Water Works Association.
AWWA 1997, Bolted Steel Tanks Factory-Coated Bolted Steel Tanks for Water Storage,
ANSI/AWWA D103-97, American Water Works Association.
Cambra, F. J., 1982, Earthquake Response Considerations of Broad Liquid Storage Tanks,
Earthquake Engineering Research Center, UCB/EERC 82/75, Nov. 1982.
Housner, George W., 1980 Dynamic Analysis of Fluids in Containers Subject to Accelerations,
ASCE Technical Seminar, Seismic Design Today: State-of-the-Art Applications, July 25-26, 1980,
Los Angeles.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), 1992. Strength Design for Reinforced Concrete Hydraulic
Structures, EM 1110-2-2104.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), 1994. Engineering and DesignStandard Practice for
Concrete for Civil Works Structures, EM 1110-2-2000. February (Change 2, March 31, 2001).
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), 2003a. Structural Design and Evaluation of Outlet Works,
EM 1110-2-2400.
SDCWA Design Manual Appendix A. Supplemental Seismic Design Criteria
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE for Water Facilities
October 2007 A-30 REV 00
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), 2003b. Time-History Dynamic Analysis of Concrete
Hydraulic Structures, EM 1110-2-6501.
Wozniak, R.S. and Mitchell W.W. Basis of Seismic Design Provisions for Welded Steel Oil Storage
Tanks. Presented at the Session on Advances in Storage Tank Design, API, Toronto, Ontario,
Canada, May, 1972.
A.8 Pump stations
Enclosure structures for pump stations should be designed in accordance with Section A.3 or A.6.2. This
includes structures that fully or partially enclose any mechanical or electrical components that are needed to
operate the pump station.
Equipment, including pumps, switchgear, transformers, and similar items, as well as above ground piping
should be designed in accordance with Section A.11. Underground piping at pump stations should be
designed in accordance with Section A.4.
A.9 Equipment
A.9.1 General
Some equipment components are inherently rugged and maintain structural integrity and functionality during
and after earthquakes. For these components, little special seismic design needs to be paid to these
elements. On the other hand, some equipment components are vulnerable to seismic hazards, and
appropriate design measures to limit risks from these vulnerabilities should be implemented where practical.
A.9.2 Vulnerabilities
Described below are vulnerabilities that can reduce the reliability of the equipment.
A. Horizontal Pump
Evaluate anchorage for seismic loads. Expansion anchors are not acceptable.
Engine (or motor) and pump must be connected by a rigid base or skid.
Sufficient slack and flexibility must be provided in cooling, fuel, and electrical lines.
Avoid attaching heavy valves to pipe near pumps.
Avoid seismic interactions of pumps with other components.
Assure that all equipment installed near vital pumps will not impact the pumps during seismic
excitation and that such equipment are securely anchored.
B. Vertical Pump
Shafts with unsupported length greater than 20 feet, must be evaluated for seismic loads.
The impeller drive must be supported within the casing.
Evaluate anchorage for seismic loads. Expansion anchors are not acceptable.
Avoid seismic interactions of pump with other components.
Assure that all equipment installed near vital pumps will not impact the pumps during seismic
excitation and that such equipment are securely anchored.
C. Valves
Cast iron valves should not be used.
Actuator and yoke should be supported by the pipe and neither should be independently braced to
the structure or supported by the structure unless the pipe is also braced immediately adjacent to the
valve to a common structure.
Sufficient slack and flexibility is provided to tubing, conduits, or piping that supplies air, fluid or power
needed to operate the valve.
SDCWA Design Manual Appendix A. Supplemental Seismic Design Criteria
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE for Water Facilities
October 2007 A-31 REV 00
Valves should not be near surrounding structures or components that could impact the valve during
seismic excitation.
D. Motor Control Centers
Must be floor mounted NEMA type enclosure.
Anchorage must be evaluated for seismic loads. At least two anchor bolts should be used per MCC
section.
Anchorage of the MCC must attach to base structural members (not sheet metal).
Avoid excessive eccentricities when mounting internal components.
Do not mount heavy or vibration sensitive components directly to sheet metal. Use structural frame
metal. Vibration sensitive components may require qualification by test or similarity, if that
component is essential to operation.
E. Control Panels and Instrument Racks
Anchorage must be evaluated for seismic loads.
All door latches must be secured with locking devices.
Wire harnesses or standoffs should be installed on cable bundles to preclude large deformation of
bundles.
F. Battery Racks
Battery cells should be lead-calcium, weighing 450 lbs. or less.
Batteries should be supported on two-step or single tier racks that have x-bracing.
Batteries should be restrained by side and end rails.
Provide snug fitting crush-resistant spacers between cells.
Racks must be anchored, and anchorage evaluated for seismic loads.
G. Above Ground Equipment Piping
Provide sufficient flexibility at equipment connections and nozzles.
Assure flexibility of pipe routed between buildings.
Assure that pipe has sufficient space to displace during seismic excitation without impacting other
components or structures.
H. Diesel Engines
Diesel engines should be anchored directly to the structural floor or mounted on a skid that is directly
anchored to the structural floor. Vibration isolators should not be used. Components (batteries, day
tanks, mufflers, electric panels, etc.) should all be seismically designed.
I. Vibration Isolated Equipment
Equipment mounted on vibration isolators are vulnerable to damage in earthquakes. Vibration
isolators for equipment essential to functionality of the facility should not be used. Snubbed
vibration isolators should only be used if the snubbing devices are approved by the engineer as
meeting the strength and operational requirements described in Section A.11.6.
A.9.3 Equipment Anchorage
Equipment anchorage is an important consideration in the design to assure functionality. A majority of equipment
failures due to seismic loads can be traced to anchorage failure. Below is a brief discussion regarding equipment
anchors and situations to avoid during installation.
SDCWA Design Manual Appendix A. Supplemental Seismic Design Criteria
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE for Water Facilities
October 2007 A-32 REV 00
A. Expansion Anchors
The wedge type (or torque controlled expansion anchor) has been widely tested and has reasonably
consistent capacity when properly installed in sound concrete. Other types of non-expanding anchors such
as lead cinch anchors, plastic inserts, and lag screw shield are not as reliable and should not be used.
Proper bolt embedment-length should be assured. Inadequate embedment may result from use of shims or
high grout pads. Bolt spacing of about ten diameters is required to gain full capacity. Comparable spacing
(ten bolt diameters) is required between bolts and free concrete edges. Expansion anchors should not be
used for vibrating equipment as they may rattle loose and provide no tensile capacity. The exposed heads of
all expansion anchors should be stamped with a letter that indicates its full length and the lettering system
should be shown on the drawings.
B. Epoxy Anchor Bolts
Epoxy anchorage systems may be used for retrofits or new construction in areas with limited edge distances or
limited embedment depths, or in other areas, subject to the environmental limitations on epoxy systems.
Inadequate embedment may result from use of shims or high grout pads. Bolt spacing of about ten diameters is
required to gain full capacity. Comparable spacing is required between bolts and free concrete edges. Epoxy
anchors should not be used for vibrating equipment. The exposed heads of all epoxy anchors should be
stamped with a letter that indicates to its full length and the lettering system should be shown on the drawings.
C. Cast-in-Place Anchors
Properly installed, deeply embedded cast-in-place headed studs and j-bolts are desirable since the failure
mode is ductile (steel governs). Properly installed undercut anchors with long embedment lengths behave
essentially like cast-in-place bolts and are similarly desirable. Care should be taken to extend anchors
through grout to provide required embedment in the concrete below. Bolt spacing and edge distance
requirements are the same as for expansion anchors.
D. Welded Anchors
Well designed and detailed welded connections to embedded plates or structural steel provide high capacity
anchorage. There are some precautions: Avoid welding to light gage steel members if possible. Line welds
have minimal resistance to bending moments applied about the axis of the weld. Puddle welds and plug
welds used to fill bolt holes in equipment bases have relatively low capacity. Welded anchors in damp areas
or harsh environments should be checked periodically for corrosion.
A.9.4 Anchorage Forces
The minimum design forces for anchorage and bracing of equipment and non-structural components should
conform to 2006 IBC. Amplification of ground motions within a building to establish in-structure response spectra
may be developed using rational methods, such as in-structure response spectra (ASCE 4-86).
A minimum factor of safety of four should be used for expansion anchors used for equipment anchorage.
The following equipment can be considered as structurally and functionally rugged, and need be designed
only for the minimum anchorage forces and the other recommendations in Appendix A:
Valves
Engines
Motors
Generators
Turbines
Horizontal Pumps
Vertical Pumps (limited unsupported shaft length)
Hydraulic and Pneumatic Operators (limited yoke length)
Motor Operators (limited yoke length)
Compressors
SDCWA Design Manual Appendix A. Supplemental Seismic Design Criteria
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE for Water Facilities
October 2007 A-33 REV 00
Transformers with anchored internal coils
A.9.5 Functional Qualification
The following equipment can be considered as structurally rugged, and need be designed for the minimum
anchorage forces and the other recommendations in Appendix A. In addition, if post-earthquake operability
of this equipment is critical, functional seismic qualification should be addressed by a knowledgeable
engineer. Functional seismic qualification may be based on test or experience with similar equipment.
Air handling equipment and fans (without vibration isolators)
Low and Medium Voltage Switchgear (< 13.8 kV)
Instrumentation Cabinets
Distribution Panels
Solid State Battery Chargers
Motor Control Centers
Instrument Racks
Batteries in battery racks (must be in seismically designed battery racks)
Floor mounted inverters up to 5 kVA
Chillers
A.9.6 Electrical Distribution and Transmission
High Voltage Substation Equipment. All new high voltage equipment should be designed for earthquakes in
accordance with IEEE 693, IEEE Recommended Practice for Seismic Design of Substations, Institute of
Electrical and Electronics Engineers (latest edition). High voltage equipment includes all equipment at
substations rated at 34.5 kV or higher. Transmission towers should be designed for earthquake, wind and
ice, wind and conductor mechanical loads in accordance with latest IEEE 693, ASCE 7 and all applicable
NESC/NES standards.
A.9.7 Vibration Isolation
In general, equipment should be rigidly mounted to supporting foundations and structures, without the aid of
vibration isolation devices. Exceptions are mechanical equipment in which vibrations transmitted from the
equipment would be troubling to building occupants or other equipment within the building.
When vibration isolation mountings are required for equipment, the mountings, and their attachments to the
supporting structures, should be designed as flexible mountings in accordance with Section 17 of IBC 2006.
The supplier of vibration isolation mounting hardware should submit certified calculations, sealed by a State
of California registered Civil or Structural Engineer, indicating the adequacy of the hardware and attachment
anchorage to meet its criteria. ASCE Manual of Practice 96 contains examples of suitable installations.
Batteries used for startup of emergency equipment should be installed in a manner to avoid rattling or
toppling under the design earthquake. This generally requires suitable battery racks with suitable insert
spacers, and/or suitable tie down systems. ASCE Manual of Practice 96 contains examples of suitable
installations.
A.9.8 References
ASCE 1998, Seismic Analysis of Safety-Related Nuclear Structures and Commentary,
American Society of Civil Engineers, ASCE 4-98, New York, N.Y.
ASCE 1999, Guide to Improved Earthquake Performance of Electric Power Systems, ASCE
Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice No. 96, American Society of Civil Engineers.
International Building Code, IBC 2006, by the International Code Council, Inc. (ICC),
SDCWA Design Manual Appendix A. Supplemental Seismic Design Criteria
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE for Water Facilities
October 2007 A-34 REV 00
A.10 Existing Facilities
A.10.1 Additions, Alterations and Change of Function
The purpose of the section is to assist in determining whether or not a seismic evaluation is required for an
existing facility.
Any of the following actions will trigger a requirement for a seismic evaluation of an entire facility including
site stability, equipment, structures, piping, etc.:
Facility upgrade that increases nominal operating capacity by 20% or more.
Facility upgrade in which 30% or more of the major pieces of operating equipment are replaced,
such that the expected design life of the facility is extended.
Facility repair, as for example from fire or other damage, that has a construction cost in excess of
30% of the replacement cost of the facility.
Addition of floor space in excess of 20% of existing space.
Addition of a partial or full story.
Change in occupancy or structure utilization.
Change in live load or equipment load by more than 20%.
Additions or alterations that introduce structural irregularities that substantially adversely affect the
seismic capacity of the original structure.
Emergency power may be desirable and should be considered in the evaluation. The seismic evaluation of
individual foundations and underground piping connections for items of major equipment (pumps,
switchgear, tanks, vessels, etc.) should be reviewed whenever such piping and foundations are re-used at
the time new equipment is installed.
A.10.2 Upgrade Requirement
If a trigger to re-assess a facility occurs, and that reassessment shows the facility does not meet the basic
life safety goal, then some type of upgrade of that facility is warranted.
If the basic life safety goal is met, then no item in the system is required to be seismically upgraded or
retrofitted as long as the basic Level of Service goal described in Section A.1.4 is satisfied. Earthquake-
induced damage to selected components and systems is acceptable, as long as the system-wide
performance remains acceptable. In cases where industry guidelines, such as FEMA 356, are more
restrictive than section A.12.2, Section A.12.2 should govern unless approved.
A.10.3 Assessment Criteria
Prior to performing seismic assessments of existing facilities, the importance of the overall facility to be
evaluated, and each of its components should be set in accordance with the criteria of Facility Design Guide,
Chapter 5, Table 5-1.
When evaluating the seismic adequacy of existing facilities, exercise judgment in application of current design criteria
contained in Appendix A and referenced design guides. Coefficients such as R or R
w
, that account for overall
construction quality, ductility, and toughness, may have to be adjusted to more conservative values than those used
for new facilities, depending on their structural and mechanical detailing and condition.
A number of industry guidelines are available to provide guidance as to when an existing structure is sufficiently
weak as to warrant seismic retrofit. Examples include ASCE 31 (formerly FEMA 310), FEMA 356 and others. Most
of these guidelines are targeted towards the rehabilitation of regular occupied buildings and may not be ideally
applicable to a water system with redundant facilities spread over a large geographic area. Some structures within
the system are irregularly occupied, and damage to non-occupied structures may be tolerable if the basic service
goal can still be met. Experience suggests that the failure of a single requirement in these documents is often shown
in evaluation, even though the overall structure / facility may be reasonably seismic robust; therefore it is important to
carefully interpret seismic deficiencies as being either local and relatively unimportant, or more global and more
serious.
SDCWA Design Manual Appendix A. Supplemental Seismic Design Criteria
FACILITY DESIGN GUIDE for Water Facilities
October 2007 A-35 REV 00
In lieu of industry guidelines, the following relaxed seismic evaluation criteria may be used for evaluation of
existing occupied facilities.
Facilities (or components of facilities) of Standard importance in this Section should be considered
acceptably reliable if they provide 75% of the strength required by Appendix A for new construction
of Standard importance.
Facilities (or components of facilities) of Important importance in this Section should be considered
acceptably reliable if they provide 80% of the strength required by Appendix A for new construction
of Important importance.
Facilities or components of Critical importance should be considered acceptably reliable if they
provide 90% of the strength and essentially all of the operability safeguards specified by Appendix A
for new construction of Critical importance.
To help the evaluation engineer assess whether or not to require upgrade of an existing facility, seismic
benefit cost analyses may be performed of the type mandated by FEMA in establishing cost-effectiveness
tests for seismic mitigation of existing structures (FEMA What is a Benefit?). If the benefit cost ratio is
much greater than 1, then it is reasonable to seismically mitigate the structure. If the benefit cost ratio is
much less than 1, then it is not economically justified to retrofit the structure. The benefit cost test should not
be the only factor in deciding whether or not to retrofit a structure.
A.10.4 Retrofit Design Criteria
Facilities found to have unacceptable seismic adequacy, in accordance with the criteria presented in A.12.3
should be brought into full strength and operability compliance with the requirements of Appendix A for new
construction, to the extent practical.
It should always be kept in mind that the intent of retrofitting structures, systems, or components of the
system is not to bring them up to current code. In many instances this may not be practical. Seismic retrofits
should focus on remediation of the most vulnerable aspects of the structure, system or component. Aspects
of the structure, system, or component that have acceptable vulnerability (acceptable meaning that the
consequences of failure are slight, or the cost to mitigate the vulnerability is excessive compared to the
benefit) may be left unmitigated at the approval of the engineer. The retrofit design should be consistent with
this guidance. It is always advisable to meet code requirements to the extent practical.
An important point to consider when retrofitting is that over-strengthening areas of the structure, system or
component that are currently deficient in strength can force the weak link(s) to occur in other elements that
are perhaps more brittle. This can have a negative effect on overall structural performance during a major
earthquake. A structure that is presently weak, but ductile, should not be strengthened to the point that its
failure mode becomes brittle with a lower energy absorbing capacity, unless the structure is designed to
elastically accommodate the earthquake.
A.10.5 References
ASCE 2002, Seismic Evaluation of Existing Buildings, American Society of Civil Engineers,
ASCE31-02, New York, N.Y.
FEMA 2000, Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Federal
Emergency Management Agency, FEMA 356, November 2000.
FEMA 2001, "What is a Benefit? Guidance on Benefit Cost Analysis of Hazard Mitigation Projects",
draft Revision 2.0, May 1, 2001. APPENDIX 1: Symbols and Notation