This document outlines a rubric for evaluating lab reports for an engineering science course at Politeknik Kota Bharu. The rubric assesses lab reports based on 10 criteria: procedures, participation, drawings/diagrams, data presentation, calculations, analysis, error analysis, questions, conclusion, and submission date. Each criterion is scored on a scale from 1 to 4 points, with detailed descriptions provided for excellent, good, satisfactory, and needs improvement performance.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100%(1)100% found this document useful (1 vote)
534 views
Example of Lab Report Mark Scheme
This document outlines a rubric for evaluating lab reports for an engineering science course at Politeknik Kota Bharu. The rubric assesses lab reports based on 10 criteria: procedures, participation, drawings/diagrams, data presentation, calculations, analysis, error analysis, questions, conclusion, and submission date. Each criterion is scored on a scale from 1 to 4 points, with detailed descriptions provided for excellent, good, satisfactory, and needs improvement performance.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1
DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE AND COMPUTER
POLITEKNIK KOTA BHARU
LAB REPORT RUBRIC BB101 - ENGINEERING SCIENCE
No. Criteria Excellent Good Satisfactory Needs Improvement
4 marks 3 marks 2 marks 1 mark
1. Procedures Procedures are clearly described. Steps are numbered and are in a complete sentence. Procedures are clearly described, but steps are not numbered and/or are not in complete sentences.
Procedures are stated but difficult to follow. Procedures are not stated. 2 Participation Participated and give full attention on the experiment. Participated and give partly attention on the experiment. Participated. Focus was lost on several occasions. Participation was minimal. 3 Drawings /Diagrams Clear, accurate diagrams are included. Diagrams are labeled neatly and accurately. Diagrams are included and are labeled neatly and accurately. Diagrams are included and are labeled. Needed diagrams are missing. 4 Data Presentation of the data in tables or graphs is done correctly and accordingly. Graphs and tables are labeled and titled. Accurate presentation of the data in tables or graphs. Graphs and tables are labeled and titled. Accurate presentation of the data in written form, but no graphs or tables is presented. Data are not shown OR are inaccurate. 5 Calculations All calculations are shown and the results are correct and labeled appropriately. Some calculations are shown and the results are correct and labeled appropriately. Some calculations are shown and the results labeled appropriately. No calculations are shown. 6 Analysis Analyze the findings. Explain the trends and oddities in the data. Explain the trends and oddities in the data. Explain very briefly the trends and oddities in the data. Needs to explain trends and oddities in the data. 7 Error Analysis Able to explain experimental errors, their possible effects, and ways to reduce errors. Able to explain experimental errors and their possible effects. Experimental errors are mentioned. There is no discussion of errors. 8 Questions The question to be answered in the report is clearly identified and stated. The question to be answered in the lab report is identified, but not clearly stated. The question to be answered in the lab report is partially identified. The question to be answered in the lab report is irrelevant. 9 Conclusion Conclusion includes whether the findings supported the hypothesis, possible sources of error, and what was learned from the experiment. Conclusion includes whether the findings supported the hypothesis and what was learned from the experiment. Conclusion includes what was learned from the experiment. No conclusion was included in the report. 10 Submission date On the date specified. 1 day late after the due date. 2 days late after the due date. More than 2 days late after the due date.