This document discusses problematic behavior and communication. It states that behavior often serves as a form of communication for the person exhibiting it and serves some function, such as getting attention or avoiding something. The document advocates taking a functional communication training approach to address the root cause or purpose of the behavior rather than just the consequences. It provides examples of communicative replacements for different functions of behavior, and notes that any replacement behavior must be at least as effective for the individual.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
61 views
Strategies 130
This document discusses problematic behavior and communication. It states that behavior often serves as a form of communication for the person exhibiting it and serves some function, such as getting attention or avoiding something. The document advocates taking a functional communication training approach to address the root cause or purpose of the behavior rather than just the consequences. It provides examples of communicative replacements for different functions of behavior, and notes that any replacement behavior must be at least as effective for the individual.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2
Behaviour And Communication
Problematic behaviour often impedes social relationships and learning
opportunities both for the student and classmates. It inhibits inclusion. Sometimes we tend to focus on dealing with consequences rather than addressing the function or purpose of the behaviour for the child. When we focus on consequential interventions, the behaviour usually is replaced by an alternate behaviour (often equally as inappropriate). We need to take a Functional Communication Training approach.
We will always select a method to communicate that is the most efficient and effective. If a behaviour is problematic, we need to remember that it involves the interaction between two people. The behaviour itself may not be problematic. It is often the interaction between the two people from which a problem arises. We also need to remember that some children have no other means to communicate except through the particular challenging behaviour. On the other hand, other children do have other ways to communicate, but no one may be listening to them unless they engage in the escalating behaviour.
Communication and behaviour are inseparable. In other words, behaviour provides a function (or means of communication) for the person who does it. (Pat Mirenda, 1999) Augmentative communication (PCS, BIGmack, signs, gestures, etc.) can provide a more appropriate means of addressing the function of the undesired behaviour for the individual.
4 Probable Functions of Behaviour Communicative Replacements to get tangibles (e.g., I want...) want, please, more to get attention or social interaction (e.g., Pay attention to me) pay attention to me, come here, more, use of conversation book to escape or avoid (e.g., I dont want...) break, go, no, stop, help, please, provide a choice to decrease sensory boredom or stress (e.g., This makes me feel better) Im bored, give me something to do message should be specific to the function & context of the behaviour
(Pat Mirenda, 1997)
It is important that the communicative replacement behaviour be at least as effective as the behaviour you wish to extinguish. Otherwise, the individual will not expend the energy to engage in that new behaviour. PROVINCIAL INTEGRATION SUPPORT PROGRAM WWW.PISP.CA
Further Resources & References:
Durand, V.M. (1990) Severe Behaviour Problems: A Functional Communication Training Approach. NY: Guilford Press. (Motivational Assessment)
Durand, V. M., & Crimmins, D. (1988). Identifying The Variables Maintaining Self-Injurious Behavior. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 18, 99- 117.
Iwata, B., Dorsey, M., Slifer, K., Bauman, K., & Richman, G. (1982). Toward A Functional Analysis of Self-Injury. Analysis and intervention in Development Disabilities, 2, 3-20.
ONeill, R., Horner, R., Albin, R., Sprague, J., Stoey, K., & Newton, S. (1997) Functional Assessment And Program Development for Problem Behavior. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole. (Functional Analysis Interview)
Mirenda, P. (1997) Functional Communication Training and Augmentative Communication: A Research Review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 207-225.
PROVINCIAL INTEGRATION SUPPORT PROGRAM WWW.PISP.CA