This document outlines the rubric for assessing MBA student projects at SVCET, Chittoor. It evaluates projects based on 5 criteria: 1) broad area and title, 2) problem definition and objectives, 3) data collection and hypothesis, 4) statistical tools, conclusions, implications and recommendations, and 5) bibliography and index. Each criteria is assessed on a scale from very poor to excellent, with defined requirements for each level. The rubric also evaluates student presentations and assigns additional marks for timely project submission, with a total possible score of 80 marks.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
362 views
Project Rubric - Req
This document outlines the rubric for assessing MBA student projects at SVCET, Chittoor. It evaluates projects based on 5 criteria: 1) broad area and title, 2) problem definition and objectives, 3) data collection and hypothesis, 4) statistical tools, conclusions, implications and recommendations, and 5) bibliography and index. Each criteria is assessed on a scale from very poor to excellent, with defined requirements for each level. The rubric also evaluates student presentations and assigns additional marks for timely project submission, with a total possible score of 80 marks.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1
PROJECT RUBRIC FOR MBA STUDENTS SVCET, CHITTOOR
Areas of Assessment and
No. of Marks Very Poor Poor Average Good Excellent (0) (1) (3) (5) (7) Broad Area and Title of project (7) (With Confirmation Letter from company) Submit on or before 26/05/14 Broad area is missing, incomplete and/or Title is extremely inaccurate Broad area shows very basic understanding, and title includes several inaccuracies Broad area mostly accurate and shows a basic understanding of key ideas Broad area is accurate, thorough and shows clear understanding. Title is appropriate to broad area Broad Area Meets and exceeds Good criteria with rich explanation, Title is related to Area . Problem definition and Objectives of the Study (7) (With Literature Review and Questionnaire) Submit on or before 09/06/14 Majority content is not related to Objectives and/or extremely inaccurate Objectives shows very basic understanding, and includes several inaccuracies Objectives is mostly accurate and shows a basic understanding of key ideas Objectives are accurate, thorough and show clear understanding of stated problem. Objectives Meets and exceeds Good criteria with stated problem. Data Collection and hypothesis (7)
Submit on or before 23/07/14 Majority content is missing in data collection. Hypothesis is incomplete and/or extremely inaccurate Content shows very basic understanding, and includes several inaccuracies in framing the data collection techniques and hypothesis Content is mostly accurate and shows a basic understanding of key ideas in data collection techniques and hypothesis Content is accurate, thorough and shows clear understanding through appropriate explanation and examples in data collection techniques and hypothesis framing Meets and exceeds Good criteria with rich explanation, examples and application of content ideas in data collection techniques and hypothesis framing Statistical tools and Conclusions/Implications /Recommendation (7)
Submit on or before 21/08/14 Project is not completed or clearly plagiarized Information is largely cut and paste from one or two sources and shows little evidence of originality in design a presentation Organization and design shows thoughtful preparation and utilizes a variety of resources to create something original Meets Average criteria plus presents information in a visually engaging way by using Excel/SPSS Meets and exceeds good criteria to show clear ownership and understanding. Uses original Excel/SPSS Bibliography and Index (7)
Submit on or before 21/08/14 Project has no resources listed. Project relies heavily on one resource Project utilizes at least two authoritative resources. Correct format is followed Project utilizes at least three authoritative resources. Correct format is followed in bibliography. All media is appropriately cited. Meets good criteria and weaves together information from at least five resource to creak something original Total of RUBRIC 35 marks Presentation in Review - I, Review - II and Review - III each carries 10 marks - 30 marks Project Seminar/Mock Viva -Voce Exam - 10 marks Submission of project in time - 5 marks TOTAL - 80 marks