This document discusses several key aspects of international human resource management (IHRM). It begins by explaining that multinational companies must coordinate resources and responsibilities across business units regardless of national boundaries. It then discusses developing global cultures and leadership capabilities to support international strategies. The document also outlines issues in IHRM like managing expatriate assignments and cultural differences. It provides models for IHRM and describes approaches like ethnocentric, polycentric, geocentric and egocentric. Finally, it discusses challenges of implementing consistent global HR practices and the importance of international managers for multinational company success.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100%(1)100% found this document useful (1 vote)
3K views
Ihrm Notes
This document discusses several key aspects of international human resource management (IHRM). It begins by explaining that multinational companies must coordinate resources and responsibilities across business units regardless of national boundaries. It then discusses developing global cultures and leadership capabilities to support international strategies. The document also outlines issues in IHRM like managing expatriate assignments and cultural differences. It provides models for IHRM and describes approaches like ethnocentric, polycentric, geocentric and egocentric. Finally, it discusses challenges of implementing consistent global HR practices and the importance of international managers for multinational company success.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8
What is IHRM
Firms operating in international markets face different conditions and competitions.
Multinationals are characterised by an interdependence of resources and responsibilities across all business units regardless of national boundaries. These companies have to cope with large flows of components, products, resources, people and information among their subsidiaries, while simultaneously recognising the specialised resources and capabilities of each. This demands a complex process of coordination and cooperation involving strong cross unit integrating devices, a strong corporate identity and a well-developed worldwide management perspective. Differences between international and domestic HRM Refer notes
Developing international HR strategies Building a global culture, which will encourage the managerial mind-sets and attitudes to develop an integrated, networked organisation to cope with global customers and global transactions? Developing the leadership and managerial capability and structure to support global strategies and operations. Gaining management interest and involvement in human resource management. Ensuring optimum quality and depth of managerial personnel to serve global customers Ensuring managers have to technical and managerial skills to work effectively at the global level. Increasing the extent and scope of managerial talent in organisation. Identifying the depth of managerial talent in organisation Ensuring management succession Sustaining and improving performance at all levels in all area of the company Linking HRM strategic objective Issues in IHRM Managing international assignments: articles about the selection,training,compensation and repatriation of expatriate failures Employee and family adjustment: Peoples adjustment to expatriate assignments can be extremely challenging, regardless of the country. Selecting the right person for a foreign assignment: this is critical for success. Expatriates must be personally adaptable and their families capable of adjusting to new and unusual challenges. Culture, communication and gauge: international HR professionals are expected to understand the implications of cultural differences between countries and their interplay with diffusing corporate cultures. Language and communication: these are important in international HR management. Expatriate managers must learn the foreign languages or rely on local interpreters to communicate with local workforce. BARRIERS TO EFFECTIVE GLOBAL HRM There are number of unique problems that global companies face when trying to implement consistent practices across their global HR networks. These are: VARIATIONS: PERCEPTION OF HR ATTITUDE AND ACTION OF HEADQUATERS TOWARDS HR RESISTANCE TO CHANGE CULTURAL DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING AND TEACHING STYLES
MODELS OF IHRM
Morgan on development of IHRM presents a model of international HRM that consists of 3 dimensions: 1. The three broad human resource activities: procumbent, allocation, utilization. These three broad activities can be easily expanded into six HR activities like: HR planning Staffing Performance management Training and development Compensation and benefits Labour relations 2. The three national or country categories involved in international HRM activities: the host country where a subsidiary may be located, the home country where the firm is head quartered and other countries that may be the source of labour or finance. 3. The three types of employees of an international firm: host country nationals (HCNs), parent country nationals (PCNs), and third-country nationals (TCNs). Thus, for eg; IBM employs Australian citizens(HCNs) in its Australian operations, often send U.S citizens (PCNs)to Asian Pacific countries on assignments, and may send some of its Singapore employees on an assignment to its Japanese operations(as TCNs) INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT APPROACHES The HRM uses four terms to describe Multi-national corporations approaches to managing and staffing their subsidiaries: 1. Ethnocentric: few foreign subsidiaries have any autonomy; strategic decision is made at headquarters. Key positions at the domestic and foreign operations are held by management personnel of headquarters. In other word, subsidiaries are managed by expatriates from the home country(PCNs) 2. Polycentric: the MNC treats each subsidiary as a distinct national entity with some decison0making autonomy. Subsidiaries are usually managed by local nationals(HCNs) who are seldom promoted to positions at head quarters 3. Geocentric: here, the MNC takes a worldwide approach to its operation, recognising the each part make as unique contribution with its unique competence. It is accomplished by a worldwide integrated business, and nationality is ignored in favour of ability.PCNs,HCNs,TCNs can be found in key positions anywhere, includimg those at senior management level at headquarters and on board of directors 4. Egocentric: reflects the geographic strategy and structure of the multinational, like geocentric approach, it utilizes a wider pool of managers but in a limited way. Personnel may move outside their countries but only within the particular geographic region. THE PATH TO GLOBAL STATUS
Export
Initial division structure (early stages of internationalization)
International division
INTERNATIONAL HRM 1. Recent years have seen a rapid increase in global activity and global competition. As the MNCs increase in number and influence, so the role of international HRM in those companies grows in significance. 2. The effective management of human resources internationally is increasingly being recognised as a major determinant of success or failure in international business. 3. Research evidence shows that: i. Shortage of international managers is becoming an increasing problem for international firms. ii. To a large extent the successful implementation of global strategies depends on the existence of an adequate supply of internationally experienced managers iii. Business failures in the international arena may often be linked to poor management of human resources iv. Expatriate failures continue to be significant problem for many international firms. EMPLOYEE MANAGEMENT ISSUES Attitude to power and authority and its implication for employee management In every culture, it is safe to argue, there is inequality of power between people, based on many factors such as wealth, education, political and social positions. At the macro level, this inequality manifests itself in hierarchical stratification for eg class, caste and feudal system. At micro level it can be seen in extent to which individual might be willing or able or reluctant or even scared to challenge the authority of people in senior position, be it parents, religious leaders, teachers or their rulers At organisational level, the inequality of power can be observed in formal and informal hierarchical structure and relationships between organisational members. The management style is more likely to be paternalistic or autocratic, decisions tend to be taken by few senior managers and carried out by subordinates and org are highly centralised with a rigid hierarchical chain of command In low-inequality cultures, all these characteristics tend to be reversed: employees respect their managers but feel able to point out them when they do not agree with their views or actions.theerefore the management style is likely participative or consultive, authority hierarchy is flat and flexible or even replaced by networks and leaderless work teams.
Tolerance for ambiguity and attitude to risk and their implications for employee management These characteristics can be directly influence the degree to which people are willing or able to make decision on their own and accept responsibility for outcome In organisations, employee who have less tolerance for uncertainty and are willing to face ambiguity and risk are more likely to avoid making decisions on their own and without direction from above, in form of procedures, regulations and or direct supervision or without at least sharing responsibilities with others. In cultures with high tolerance for uncertainty and willingness to take risk, people tend to be entrepreneurial, able to handle uncertain situations and prepared to take risky decision on their own Interpersonal trust and its implications for employee management Are they capable of making decision on their own? Do they have sufficient knowledge about the task at hand? Will they put the companys interest before theirs? In cultures characterised by rampant corruption and generally low level of skills and competence, mangers are likely to delegate decision-making authority only to a few trusted employees, preferably their own relative and friends. Individualism and collectivism and their implications for employee management These concepts do not easily lend themselves to clear cut interpretations. An individualistic culture is generally characterised by a high value placed on ones independence, autonomy and privacy a belief in ones own worth, confidence in ones own idea and opinion. Preference for certain leadership behaviours and its implications for employee management People living indifferent parts of world have different expectations from these who are in leadership positions be it country ruler, a local community leader or a senior member of the family like a grand old uncle or grandfather M