This document provides design calculations for a sewage treatment plant in Sivaganga Municipality, India. Key details include:
- The plant is designed to serve an ultimate population of 45,000 and intermediate population of 30,000
- Calculations are provided for screen chambers, grit chambers, anaerobic ponds, facultative ponds, and polishing ponds
- Pond sizes, depths, detention times, and bund designs are calculated based on organic loading rates and effluent standards
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
955 views5 pages
STP Design
This document provides design calculations for a sewage treatment plant in Sivaganga Municipality, India. Key details include:
- The plant is designed to serve an ultimate population of 45,000 and intermediate population of 30,000
- Calculations are provided for screen chambers, grit chambers, anaerobic ponds, facultative ponds, and polishing ponds
- Pond sizes, depths, detention times, and bund designs are calculated based on organic loading rates and effluent standards
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5
UGS Scheme in Sivaganga
Municipality Final Report Design Calculations
Design Calculations Sewage Treatment Plant at Vembangudi - Sivaganga Municipality 1. Basic Design Criteria Population to be served ultimate! " #$%&&& Population to be served 'ntermediate! " ($%&&& Sewage output per capita = 90 lpcd verage !low "#ntermediate$ = %&%' M(D verage !low "ultimate$ = )&*' M(D +ea, in!low rate -0-*.-0*' +ea, pumping = /9'&0 lps (ow in!low rate -00'.-0*' low rate pumping = )% lps 12D load per capita assuming raw sewage 12D o! *00 mg3l = 90 4 *00 = -) gm3day say Total B)D load at ultimate stage " *.+# , +&& " $$1- .g/day Total B)D load at intermediate stage " 0.0# , +&& " 1(*- .g/day Faecal coli!orms "FC$ in raw sewage = % 4 /0 ) 3 /00 ml verage pond temperature is assumed as -% 0 C in coldest month o! year "Dec&$ 5vaporation losses are ignored6 as it will 7e very small in winter when there will 7e rains also& 5!!luent standards to 7e met8 12D % 9-0 mg3l : SS 9 *0 mg3l : FC9/060003/00 ml $. Screen C1amber Screen cham7er will 7e designed !or ultimate pea, pumping rate o! say 0&/9'0m * 3s& Since coarse screens is provided at main pumping station6 only medium screen with clear openings o! -% mm: with 7ars o! si;e %0 mm 4 /0mm6 slope 0% 0 to hori;ontal is proposed at S<+& Depth o! the !low "controlled 7y +arshall !lume placed downstream$ =ide +ara = 0&%* m ssuming velocity through screen openings as 0&'% m3s >o o! 7ars "n$ is given 7y "n ? /$ 0&0-% 4 0&%* 4 0&'% = 0&/9'0 n = /@&@/ A /) Say 2idt1 o3 screen c1amber " 1* 4 1! , &.&$0 4 1* , &.&1 " &.($m or ($cmsay! +rovide / channel @- cm wide U*BpBSB90lpcd.SFRB=*Bstp B-*''09'0'&doc S<C /3% UGS Scheme in Sivaganga Municipality Final Report Design Calculations +ea, velocity in approach channel = 0&/9'0 3 "0&@- 4 0&%*$ = 0&@0 m3s C 0&% m3s& 2, s only manually ra,ed screen is proposed and as the unit will 7e in stainless steel6 no stand.7y channel is needed& +. 5rit C1amber Design is !or ultimate pea, !low "0&/9'0 m * 3s$ 6o. o3 c1annels proposed " 1 duty 4 1 standby +ea, !low to 7e handled = 0&/9'0 m * 3s ssuming !low through velocity o! 0&* m3s and detention o! @0 sec 5!!ective length = @0 4 0&* = /' m dding e4tra !or tur7ulence at entry6 total length = -- m say Flow depth controlled 7y +arshall !lume = 0&%* m C3S rea reDuired = 0&/9'0 3 0&* = 0&@@ m - verage width o! channel = 0&@@ 3 0&%* = /&-% m +rovide trape;oidal section /&)m at top6 0&' m at 7ottom Flow through =elocity = 0&/9'0 3"/&-% 4 0&%*$ = 0&-9 m3s 2E Depth control section will 7e a +arshall !lume6 which will dou7le !or !low measuring also& "See 0 7elow$ Settling velocity = 0&/9'0 3 "/&) 4 /'$ = 0&00@ m3s which is 9 0&0/'m3s reDuired 7y C+F552 Manual !or settling 0&/% mm particle o! -&@% sp&gr&2E& Grit accumulation = 0&0% to 0&/% m * 3 Mld "as per Manual$ recommended8 0&/%m * 3Mld Grit production per day at = )&*' Mld 4 0&/% m * 3 Mld = /&// m * 3day ssuming grit will 7e removed "twice in a wee,$ Guantity to 7e stored in each channel = /&// 4 )3- = *&'9 m * Depth o! grit accumulation = *&'9 3 "-- 4 0&'$= 0&-- m ctual depth to 7e allowed to prevent scouring o! settled grit = 0&*% m say Depth o! !low at minimum !low o! )% lps will 7e 0&-' m <op !low width at D o! 0&-' = /&-0 m =elocity through grit channel at lowest rate o! = 0&0)% 3 ""/&-0?0&'$ 4 0&-'3-$ = 0&-@ m3s6 which is !airly close to6 desired value o! 0&*0 m3s& U*BpBSB90lpcd.SFRB=*Bstp B-*''09'0'&doc S<C -3% UGS Scheme in Sivaganga Municipality Final Report Design Calculations -. Measuring 7lume dopt +arshall !lume with throat width o! --% mm& G "in lps$= --@0 4 H 4 "Fa$ *3- For G i$ Ma4imum pumping rate at ultimate stage 0&/' m * 3s F = ""/9'&0 3 "--@0 4 0&--%$$ -3* = 0&%* m say ii$ Minimum pumping rate intermediate stage 0&0)% m * 3s F = "")% 3 "--@0 4 0&--%$$ -3* = 0&-' m say 0. Secondary Treatment naero7ic pond ? Facultative pond ? polishing ponds Design is 7ased on Design Manual o! M25> I F6 Gol #6 /99) Design o! waste sta7ilisation ponds "considering average rate o! !low only$ Jear +opulation Flow in M(D -00' 0@000 0&/0 M(D -0-* @-000 %&%' M(D -0*' '-000 )&*' M(D a 8naerobic Pond 9ltimate stage! * modules !or Ultimate population Min& temperature anticipated = -% o C say Ma4& 2rganic loading permissi7le= *%0g3m * 3day dopt *00 g3m * 3day as a !actor o! sa!ety Capacity reDuired = "--/0 3 *00$ 4 /000 = )*'0 m * Detention period = )*'0 3 )*'0 = / day Min& detention period should 7e / day ssume de.sludging interval = * years "ssumption8 * ponds6 one pond desludged each year$ <otal sludge = '-000 4 0&00 4* = 9'00 m * <otal pond volume = )*'0 ? 9'00 =/)--0 m * Depth assumed = -&% m rea reDuired = /)--0 3 -&% =@''' m - ssume * modules rea o! each module = @''' 3 * = --9@ m - U*BpBSB90lpcd.SFRB=*Bstp B-*''09'0'&doc S<C *3% UGS Scheme in Sivaganga Municipality Final Report Design Calculations Fence provide area o! each pond is 0&-* ha 12D removal = )0K = /%%0 ,g 3 day F& coli!orms in e!!luent = % 4 /0 ) 3 "/?@&-4/$ = @&9 4 /0 @ 3 /00 ml b. 7acultative Pond 2rganic loading rate permissi7le L temperature -% 0 C is *%0 ,g 3 ha day& Residual 12D in naero7ic pond e!!luent = --/0 4 0&* = @@0 ,g3day Facultative pond area reDuired = "@@0 3 *%0$ = /&9 ha depth = /&% m llowing !or sloping sides6 assume /&0% m average depth Capacity provided = /9000 4 /&0% = -)%%0 m * Detention period = "-)%%0 3 )*'0$ = *&) days Satis!ies minimum detention period reDuirement at -% o C ssume overall 12D removal o! 90K in naero7ic pond ? Facultative pond& 12D in Facultative +ond e!!luent = *00 4 0&/ = *0 mg3l Residual 12D load = --/0 4 0&/ = --/,g3day ssume * modules !or ultimate population rea !or each module = /9000 3 * = @***m - Fence provide area o! each pond is 0&)* ha F Coli!orms in Facultative pond e!!luent = @&9 4 /0 @ 3 "/ ? "@&- 4 *&)$$ = -&'' 4 /0 % 3 /00 ml C /06000 Removal not su!!icient c. Polis1ing Pond 8 Detention period = * days at temperature -% 0 C "a7ove -0 0 C$ Capacity reDuired = )*'0 4 * = --/00 m * verage Depth = /&0% m rea = --/00 3 /&0% =/%-@9 m - rea o! each module = /%-@9 3 * = %090 m - Fence provide area o! each pond is 0&%/ ha <otal Hater spread area = /&%* ha 12D loading rate = --/ 3 /&%* = /00 ,g3ha3d (oading rate is within permissi7le value o! )%K o! loading o! preceeding F+ or -@* ,g3ha3day 5!!luent 12DL -%Kremoval = *0 4 )%3/00 = --&% mg3l U*BpBSB90lpcd.SFRB=*Bstp B-*''09'0'&doc S<C 03% UGS Scheme in Sivaganga Municipality Final Report Design Calculations F&Coli!orms = -&@) 4 /0 % 3 "/?@&- 4 *$ = /0000 3 /00 ml Final 12D and F. Coli!orm value not satis!actory& d. Polis1ing Pond B Detention period = * days Si;e it as !or polishing pond 12D o! e!!luent = --&% 4 0&)% = /) mg3l& <his is satis!actory F& Coli!orms = /0@90 3 "/?@&- 4 *$ = )%0 3 /00 ml <his is satis!actory& e. Bond design 8naerobic Pond Bunds <op width o! 7und = >ot less than /&% m dopt - m in view o! the greater depth "-&% m$ Free 7oard = 0&@ m Common 7unds with water on 7oth sides 5ither side may 7e empty with water on other side or water may 7e on 7oth sides dopt slope -&% F8 /= "lined$ s per graphical construct6 line o! saturation !alls within toe o! 7und s concrete lining is proposed which will reduce percolation6 clearance !rom toe o! 7und to line o! saturation not proposed& 1unds with water on one side only #nside slope /=8 -F "lined$ 2utside slope /=8 -&%F <ur!ed 7acultative Pond and Maturation Pond Bunds <op width o! 7und = /&% m Free 7oard = 0&@ m Common 7unds with water on 7oth sides8 +rovide /= 8 -F 2uter 7unds with water only on one side #nside slopes /=8 /&%F "lined$ 2utside slopes /=8 -&%F "tur!ed$ U*BpBSB90lpcd.SFRB=*Bstp B-*''09'0'&doc S<C %3%