Geostatistics 2001
Geostatistics 2001
Geostatistics
and
Advanced
Geostatistics
January 2001
MineSight
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
Section 7Point Validation/Cross Validation of Estimation Methods
Learning Outcome . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
Types of Point Interpolations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
Interpolation Controls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
Point Validation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
Section 8Model Statistics/Geologic Resources
Learning Outcome . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
Reserve Calculations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
Model Statistics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82
Grade/Tonnage Plots . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87
Plot IDW and Histograms Together . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89
Model Statistics At and Between Cutoffs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 810
Model Correlations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 814
Probability Plots . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 818
Section 9Model Calculations
Learning Outcome . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
Model Calculations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
Section 10Quantifying Uncertainty
Learning Outcome . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101
Distance to the Closest Composites Calculations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101
Kriging Variance/RVI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105
Combined Kriging Variance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105
Section 11Change of Support
Learning Outcome . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111
Change of Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111
Global Correction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111
Kriges Relationship of Variance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111
Calculation of Block Variance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112
Change of Support on Composite Values . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114
Distribution of Theoretical Blocks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118
Volume-Variance Correction on Composite Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1111
Volume Variance Correction on Model Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1115
Section 12Indicator Kriging to Define Geologic Boundary Above a Cutoff
Learning Outcome . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121
IK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121
Assign Indicators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121
Variogram of Indicators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124
Model the Indicator Variogram . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126
Krige Indicators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128
View Results in MineSight
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1211
Section 13Multiple Indicator Kriging (M.I.K.)
Learning Outcome . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131
M.I.K . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131
Uses of Indicators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131
Incremental Statistics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132
Determine M.I.K. Cutoffs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136
Statistics for M.I.K. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138
Calculating Indicator Variograms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1312
Modeling Indicator Variograms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1216
Variogram Parameter File . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1317
Multiple Indicator Kriging . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1319
M.I.K. Reserves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1323
Introduction to the Course
MineSight
, but concentrates on a
typical metal open pit mine evaluation using a given set of data.
How This
Workbook Is
Organized
This workbook is divided into sections that follow the steps you would take
to complete a project evaluation. All sections contain a basic step, or series
of steps, for using MineSight
. If any portion of
your training is unclear, ask the consultant to repeat the steps or lesson until
you fully understand the idea. We have more concern for our users than for
an agenda.
This training course is intended to cover a wide number of topics rather than
a few topics in depth. For this reason, practice time to learn everything in
detail may not be sufficient. It will be to your advantage to use MineSight
as soon as possible after your return home while the ideas remain fresh.
For help after training, Mintec provides on-call support weekdays from 6:00
a.m. to 6:00 p.m. (MST). From the US, call 800-533-MEDS (6337); from
Canada call 800-548-MEDS (6337); from Mexico call 95 (800) 548-MEDS
(6337); from Chile call 123-0020-2154; from Peru call 001 (800) 533-MEDS
(6337); from South Africa call 0800-996052; or from other countries call
520-795-3891.
The Mintec website provides the latest in program updates and other useful
files. See the Quick Reference Guide for details on how to use the service,
and read the newsletter for updates on what is available.
Introduction to the Course
Page I2 MineSight
.
If you are calculating statistics on the composites, you must have calculated
the composites. In this section you can compute classical statistics on the
assays and composites. This is not required for later work.
Learning Outcome
In this section you will learn:
How to produce a histogram of assay values
How to produce a histogram of composite values
Classical
Statistics
Statistical operations available within MineSight
:
Mean and standard deviation
Histograms
Cumulative frequency plots
Correlations
Cumulative probability plots
Use classical statistics to:
Analyze data to determine descriptive parameters
Make inferences about an entire population based on samples
Some difficulties involved with the application of classical statistics to
mineral projects are:
Mineral deposit data is generally not independent. It is for this reason
that geostatistics was developed.
Different geologic zones may have different statistical populations.
Mixing zones may produce incorrect statistics.
Different types of samples have different volumes and should be kept
separate for analysis, e.g., drillhole assays and bulk samples.
Although samples may be equal in size, they may not have an equal
volume of influence. Drilling tends to be closer spaced in higher grade
areas so the statistics may be indicating a higher proportion of ore than
exists.
Section 1&Statistics
Page 1&2 MineSight
are:
Spherical
Exponential
Linear
Nested
Exercise
Select Group Name = STATISTICS
Operations Type = Plots
Procedure Desc. = H-Scatter plots p31101.dat
Panel 1 File and Data Selection
We will use File 8 composites and select Cu as the item.
Panel 2 Optional Plot Parameters
Section 2Variograms
MineSight
Types of
Interpolations
There are several methods of interpolation provided to you.
Polygonal assignment
Inverse distance weighting
Relative elevations
Trend plane
Gradients
Kriging
Interpolation
Controls
There is a large range of methods for controlling the interpolation available.
Search distance N-S, E-W, and by elevation
Minimum and maximum number of composites to use for a block
Maximum distance to the nearest composite
Use or omit geologic control
In the following example, inverse distance weighting is used without the octant
search.
Section 5Model Interpolation
Page 52 MineSight
Types of Point
Interpolations
Each composite is interpolated using different powers of inverse distance
weighting method and Kriging. The results are then summarized showing
the differences between the estimated and actual known data values. The
following interpolations are done by default by the program.
Inverse distance weighting (IDW) of power 1.0
IDW of power 1.5
IDW of power 2.0
IDW of power 2.5
IDW of power 3.0
Kriging
Interpolation
Controls
There is a large range of parameters for controlling the point interpolation.
Search distance N-S, E-W, and by elevation
3-D ellipsoidal search
Minimum and maximum number of composites to use
Maximum distance to the nearest composite
Use or omit geologic control
Inverse distance powers and variogram parameters
Point interpolation program M524V1 outputs the results for each composite
used to an ASCII file. These results are evaluated using program M525TS
and the statistical summaries are output to the report file.
Section 7Point Validation/Cross Validation
Page 72 MineSight
IK
The basis of the technique is transforming the composite grades to a (0 or 1)
function. All composite grades above cutoff can be assigned a code of 1
whereas all the composites below can be assigned a code of 0. Then a
variogram can be formed from the indicators which can be used for Kriging the
indicators. The resulting Kriging estimate represents the probability of each
block having a grade value above the cutoff.
Assign Indicators
Select Group Name = COMPOSITES
Operation Type = Calculations
Procedure Desc. = User-Calcs (comps) - p50801.dat
Panel 1 Labels of Composite Items to use
Use item altrx as the item to store the indicators.
Section 12Indicator Kriging
Page 122 MineSight