EC2 Design Tool Robin Atkinson
EC2 Design Tool Robin Atkinson
P
- 1 - 5 - 2
Front 1 Slender 49
-
50
Introduction 2 STAAD 51
-
53
Key Features 3 Tables 54
-
57
FAQ 4 Service Equation 58
-
63
References 5 Ultimate Equation 64
-
65
Main 6
-
11 Coefficients 66
-
68
Info 12
-
27 Example 69
-
81
Basics 28 - 29 Restraints 82
-
98
Crack Control 30 - 34 Detailing 99
-
102
Shear 35 - 40 Moment Capacities 103
-
104
Punching Shear 41 - 43 Fatigue 105
-
108
Flexure 44 - 48
By
EC2 DESIGN TOOL
Excel Program
Howes Atkinson Crowder LLP
HAC-PRO
Robin Atkinson BSc, CEng, FICE, FIStructE
http://www.hacengineers.co.uk
16th September 2012
CONTENTS AND PAGE NUMBERS
Link to Download Updates and Licence Information
http://www.hac.idc5.co.uk/hacrc/Info.htm
2
INTRO 1
IMPORTANT NOTES SAVE THIS FILE AS A MASTER. ONLY WORK ON COPIES
DO NOT SAVE DIRECTLY TO A SERVER. SAVE TO YOUR MACHINE.
EC2 DESIGN TOOL
INTRODUCTION Howes Atkinson Crowder LLP
Copyright 2009 HAC
HAC-PRO 1 - 5 - 2
Frequently Asked Questions
A selection of likely questions and some further elaboration is provided in the FAQ sheet.
INTRODUCTION
Method and Layout
The data is entered within the sheet called MAIN. It is divided into Global Data which controls all of the
designs and Local Data which is adjustable for each individual design case. The user enters the Global
Data first and then the Local section properties, reinforcement and loadings and the program displays the
ultimate capacity ratios and service crack widths and other compliant related output including thermal and
shrinkage. It does not provide the code clause by clause input style that is offered by other spreadsheets
because its primary aim is to process multiple calculations in a tabular layout.
The detailed output demonstrates the compliance with the codes and is suitable for submission for
checking by others. There are numerous interactive charts and diagrams which relate to a chosen design
case and are displayed on the 2nd MAIN sheet and assist in the input and understanding of the process.
Background
The author has over 30 years experience in the design of concrete structures and this program has
evolved over a period of 10 years by constant use. It was initially designed to introduce a repeatable
procedure into the design of concrete tanks. It then developed into a universal design method suitable for
slabs beams and columns as well. More recently it has been updated to incorporate design to EC2 and
CIRIA C660. A particular feature is the ability to display the ultimate capacity unity ratio for combined axial
and bending therefore removing the need for a plotted chart each time.
Aim
The primary aim of this program is to provide a powerful design tool that enables engineers to process
and display a number of reinforced concrete designs to the British and Euro codes in a concise and
orderly manner. It also aims to offer a useful training tool via the use of interactive charts and diagrams.
National Annex Values
The UK National Annex values have been used in all cases and key values are displayed. An c value of
0.85 has been used for concrete in flexure and axial loading and a value of 1.0 has been used for shear
and tension. This spreadsheet can easily be modified to incorporate other National Annexes.
Guidance on input method and design matters is provided via comment boxes. This information is also
reproduced within the Info sheet, thus providing an in depth guide which can be printed. Where data such
as shear legs or additional bars or compression bars is not required, a zero should be entered. Defaults
are suggested for thermal which can be used when a design is not thermal critical.
Design Pages
The program offers 24 designs over 2 pages. Detailed charts are reproduced to a large scale on a
separate page and can be printed out.
There are three styles for the design sheet. Normal is for every day use and only shows the notation for
normal shear. Punch only shows the notation required for punching shear. All shows the notation
required for all shear types on the same sheet. Adjustable data is displayed in bold green or violet.
3
KEY 1
Normal
Punch
All
N/A
BC
Re-arrange to Give
1.0 0.0
aX + bX + cX + d = 0
1.0 -1.0
L2
H /
D3 / D2 /
L3
N/A
Howes Atkinson Crowder LLP
Copyright 2009 HAC
ULTIMATE EQUATION
HAC-PRO 1 - 5 - 2
D1 /
TD3 TD1
EC2 DESIGN TOOL
CD2 CD1 CD3
165 N/A
Cross Section
Ult Strain x Es & Reinforcement Stress
& 10 x Concrete Stress
-800
-600
-400
-200
0
200
400
600
800
N/mm2
X = 0.61d2 X = 2.63d2 X = 0.61d3 X = 0.61d1
Border StrainxEs Hinge Point Reinf F1
Reinf L3 Reinf F2 Xo N/A
Ult N & M Capacity Curve & N & M Ratio Line
-6000
-4000
-2000
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
-500 0 500 1000 1500 2000
M (kNm)
N (kN)
X = 0.61d2 X = 2.63d2 X = 20.49d2
X = 0.61d3 X = 0.61d1 X = H
X = H / 0.8 (EC2) N/A N/A
Ratio Mu
65
ULT 2
DERIVATION OF THE UNIVERSAL ULTIMATE N - M EQUATION
Establish Following Values:-
Steel Modulus of Elasticity Es - This value is fixed by the program Es 200 kN / mm
Maximum concrete compressive strain cu2 Value reduces if Fcu > 50 N/mm Abbrev Used cu 0.0035
Maximum Strain x Es value (i.e. equiv Reinf Stress) at compression face unless EC2 and X > H cuEs 700 N / mm
Strain x Es value (i.e. equivalent Reinforcement Stress) at centre for EC2 when X >= H 350 N / mm
Max Reinf Stress fpd = fyk / This is defined in Global values. 435 N / mm
Max concrete stress either EC2 or BS value but EC2 symbol used (NA ct = 0.85) 17.00 N / mm
TD where reinf Tens value is locked = 1 / ( (1 + ( Fsmax / Es ) / cu ) ) * D = 0.616 x D
CD where reinf Comp value is locked = cu / (cu - ( Fsmax / Es ) ) * D = 2.639 x D
= 20.4 x D2
N & M values and polar angle value when X = H / in order to set moment due to stress block to zero and lock any increase in length of it
N & M polar angle values for X / at start and finish of F1, L3 & F2 reinf bars using equivalent squares to establish if within stress block
N & M values and polar angle values for X at control pointsTD and CD for F1, L3 & F2 reinforcement to check for locks.
N / M polar angle of applied N - M Forces. Angle is 90 when M=0 and N is negative and increases in an anticlockwise rotation
How To deal with All the Variables and Create a Universal Equation for BS and EC2
It is essential to set up a system of abbreviations and "variable constants" which are established according to where X is along the N - M curve
The polar angle of the applied N - M ratio is then checked against the angles for the key control points and the constants are then established
Once all of the constants are known, the equation can be completed, re-arranged into a Cubic Equation and then solved
How To Find N / M and Polar Angle when X is at the key Locking Points and Reinforcement Locations.
Variable BC IF code is EC2 and X > H virtual hinge at X = 0.5 H = 0 Fs =0.5cuEs N/mm at X = 0.5H
Constants Otherwise virtual hinge at X = 0 = 1 Fs = cuEs N/mm2 at X =0
L1 or L3 IF X < 0.616 D1 or D3 = -1 Stress = - Fs max
IF X > 2.639 D1 or D3 except if EC2 & X > H = 1 Stress = + Fsmax
Otherwise and including if EC2 & X > H = 0 Stress is Variable
L2 IF X < 0.616 D2 (CeD2 value relates to H and D2) = -1 Tens Stress = - Fs max
IF X > 2.639 D2 and if EC2 & X > H & X < CeD2 = 1 Comp Stress = + Fsmax
Otherwise, incl if = EC2 & X > H & X > CeD2 = 0 Stress is Variable
DC1 Displaced concrete stress x prop of bar in stress block = 0 to -17.00 N / mm
DC3 Displaced concrete stress x prop of bar in stress block = 0 to -17.00 N / mm
DC2 Displaced concrete stress x prop of bar in stress block = 0 to -17.00 N / mm
HY If X / > = H HY = 0 but to avoid a divide / zero use = 1E-07 Ensures the conc stress
Otherwise, where stress block is within section = 1 block does not exceed H
N = (N / M) * Moment about Centre N / M values is always known Excel notation has been used for mult ( * ) and power ( ^ )
N = As1 * ( - ( 1 - L1^2) * 0.5cuEs * (BC+1) * (d1 - X ) / (X - ( 0.5H*(1-BC) ) ) ) + L1 * Fsmax + DC1)
+ As3 * ( - ( 1 - L3^2) * 0.5cuEs * (BC+1) * (d3 - X ) / (X - ( 0.5H*(1-BC) ) ) ) + L3 * Fsmax + DC3)
+ As2 * ( - ( 1 - L2^2) * 0.5cuEs * (BC+1) * (d2 - X ) / (X - ( 0.5H*(1-BC) ) ) ) + L2 * Fsmax + DC2)
+ HY * (B * * Conc * X ) + ( B * * Conc * H / ) * (1 - HY)
=
( - As1 * ( - ( 1 - L1^2) * 0.5cuEs * (BC+1) * (d1 - X ) / (X - ( 0.5H*(1-BC) ) ) ) + L1 * Fsmax + DC1) * (d1 - H / 2) )
+ ( - As3 * ( - ( 1 - L3^2) * 0.5cuEs * (BC+1) * (d3 - X ) / (X - ( 0.5H*(1-BC) ) ) ) + L3 * Fsmax + DC3) * (d3 - H / 2) )
+ ( - As2 * ( - ( 1 - L2^2) * 0.5cuEs * (BC+1) * (d2 - X ) / (X - ( 0.5H*(1-BC) ) ) ) + L2 * Fsmax + DC2) * (H / 2 - d2) )
+ ( HY * (B * * Conc * X ) * ( (0.5 * H ) - ( 0.5* * X ) ) )
Copyright 2009 HAC
HAC-PRO 1 - 5 - 2
Howes Atkinson Crowder LLP
fpd = Fsmax =
0.5cuEs
EC2 DESIGN TOOL
N & M values and polar angle value when X = H in order to reset the hinge point for EC2 design.
Check at X = H / and EC2 only for the case where X is > H and > CeD to see if reinf is variable again for L2 and note L2e.
(N / M) *
Enter values into equations below to find N & M and N / M at each point. Then calculate the Polar Angles for all key points
(N / M) *
These terms are multiplied out and re-arranged and ordered to give a Cubic Equation in the format:-
aX + bX + cX + d = 0
Check X at bar locations i.e. D2 - /2 to D2 + /2, D1 - /2 to D1 + /2, D3 - /2 to D3 + /2 to calculate displaced concrete deductions
Compare X against TD and CD to establish if the reinf stress is fixed at -Fsmax (ten) or + Fsmax (comp) or variable and set L1, L3 and L2
CeD2 stress variable again if EC2 & X>H & ((Fsmax*0.5*H) - (0.5*cuEs*D2))/(Fsmax - (0.5*cuEs))*D2
(N / M) *
(N / M) *
fcd = Conc =
Values in Bold Blue derive from Global & Local Input
ULTIMATE EQUATION
66
COEFF 1
Extract From Moody Charts For a Wall Panel
Values are for Hydrostatic, Full to Brim, Fixed at Base and Sides and Free at Top for a/b = 3/4 & a/b = 1
NOTES a = Length / 2 b = Height x = hor distance y = vert distance
If a / b = 3 / 4, L / H = 1.5 If a / b = 1, L / H = 2
x / a = 1 is at Mid Length y / b = 1 is at Top of Wall
Mx = Horizontal Moment Coeff My = Vertical Moment Coeff
Rx = Horizontal Reaction Coeff Ry = Vertical Reaction Coeff
Values are for Hydrostatic, Full to Brim, Fixed at Base and Sides and Free at Top
Highlighted Zones indicate key Mx & Rx (hor) & My & Ry (vert) Coefficients
These tables can be difficult to use and normally the highlighted values are all that are needed or used.
The following sheet displays the key values graphically for various Loadings, Depths and Top Fixity.
Common a / b or Length / Height ratios are available together with 2 additional values for Mvert.
Howes Atkinson Crowder LLP
Copyright 2009 HAC
HAC-PRO 1 - 5 - 2
EC2 DESIGN TOOL
MOMENT AND SHEAR COEFFICIENTS
67
COEFF 2
Rectangular Tanks Values taken From:
Moments and Reactions For Rectangular Plates
Moment and Shear Coefficient Charts Engineering Monograph No. 27 by W. T. Moody
Base and Sides Fixed United States Department of the Interior
Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, Colorado
Mv = Mv Coeff x Base Pressure x H
Mh = Mh Coeff x Base Pressure x H
Rv = Rv Coeff x Base Pressure x H a / b 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.5 3 24
Rh = Rh Coeff x Base Pressure x H L / H = 0.5 1 1.5 2 3 6 48
Rv Coeff T 0 0 0 0 0
Rv Coeff B 0.195 0.3235 0.4055 0.4564 0.505 0.4234 0.500
Rh Coeff 0.1514 0.2421 0.2542 0.2564 0.313
N N Y Y N N N
http://www.usbr.gov/pmts/hydraulics_lab/pubs/EM/EM27.pdf
Howes Atkinson Crowder LLP
Copyright 2009 HAC
EC2 DESIGN TOOL
MOMENT AND SHEAR COEFFICIENTS
Free Top Display
1.000
HAC-PRO 1 - 5 - 2
Depth / H
Load Type Hydro
Vertical Wall Moment Coefficients - Base & Sides Fixed
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
-0.040 -0.020 0.000 0.020 0.040 0.060 0.080 0.100
Mv Coeff
H
Mv L / H = 0.5 Mv L / H = 1 Mv L / H = 1.5 Mv L / H = 2
Mv L / H = 3 Mv L / H = 6 Mv L / H = 48
Horizontal Wall Moment Coefficients - Base & Sides Fixed
-0.040
-0.020
0.000
0.020
0.040
0.060
0.080
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
L
Mh
Coeff
Mh L / H = 3.0 Mh L / H = 2.0 Mh L / H = 1.5 Mh L / H = 1.0 Mh L / H = 0.5
68
COEFF 3
Circular Tanks Values taken From:
Circular Tanks Without Prestressing
Tension, Moment and Shear by
Coefficient Charts Portland Cement Association
Full Depth Skokie, Illinois, USA
(H)/Dt 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2 3 4 5 6 8 10 12 14 16
A A A A A A A A A A A A A A
Rv Coeff 0.436 0.374 0.339 0.317 0.299 0.262 0.236 0.213 0.197 0.174 0.158 0.145 0.135 0.127
(H)/Dt Exact 3.00 Max V = 0.262 x 360 = 94 kN / m
(H)/Dt Used 3.00
Base P kN/m 60.0 Max T = 0.362 x 1200 = 434 kN / m
kN/m Base P x H 360
K Factor Base P x Dia /2 1200 Min M = -0.033 x 2160 = -72 kNm / m
Base P x H 2160 Max M = 0.010 x 2160 = 21 kNm / m
Copyright 2009 HAC
HAC-PRO 1 - 5 - 2
Howes Atkinson Crowder LLP
EC2 DESIGN TOOL
MOMENT AND SHEAR COEFFICIENTS
10
1.00
Display (A = Auto)
http://www.cement.org/bookstore/profile.asp?pagenum=1&pos=9&catID=&id=218
Base
t m
H m
Dia m
Fixed
6.0
40.0
0.30
Hoop Tension Coefficients
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40
T Coeff
H
0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2 3 4 5
6 8 10 12 14 16
Vertical Moment Coefficients
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
-0.040 -0.035 -0.030 -0.025 -0.020 -0.015 -0.010 -0.005 0.000 0.005 0.010 0.015
Mv Coeff
H
0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2 3 4 5
6 8 10 12 14 16
69
EXAM 1 / 13
Worked Examples
1 Rectangular Tank
Design a concrete tank 16m x 12m x 8m high on piles at 4m ctrs with a settlement of 300kN / mm
The normal water level is at 7m. Interpolate chart values between 0.667 H and 1.0 H
It is possible that the tank can be full to the brim in occasional but short duration cases.
Design as Free at top and then consider possibilities of connecting the tops of the long sides
Backfill is granular and ground level is at 2 / 3 of tank ht for charts analysis and at 5m for computer analysis.
Ground Water is taken to be at ground level
Surcharge is a Variable Action of 10 kN / m
Design for Tightness Class 1 under Normal Conditions
For Full To Brim Conditions - Assess acceptable crack widths. (Class 0 or 1)
Aggregate is Default. Relative Humidity on non water retaining faces is 85%
Drying will be from 1 Face
Concrete grade is C 30 / 37, Class N with 340 kg / m3 O/A cement with 50% GGBS
Construction will be in Summer. Seasonal Temp drop is 20 Deg for Walls and 15 Deg for Slabs
Exposure class is XC2. Design life to a major maintenance / repair = 60 yrs. Permitted Cover Dev = 10mm
Walls are designed as Edge Restrained. Base is End Restrained to some degree by piles.
Assess what Restraint Factors should be used
Consider the restraint provided by piles a 350 x 350 Driven Piles
b 700 Dia CFA Piles
+ +
Use Coefficient Charts and Moody Tables to calculate the maximum horizontal & vertical forces
Calculate the base slab flat slab moments by hand and distribute into column and middle strips
Calculate the ultimate pile loads, multiply by appropriate factors and consider punching shear
Assess Uplift on Piles for case where tank is empty
Compare results for Full to Brim from those generated from a computer model.
Assess Reinforcement for Shrinkage and Applied Loads based on results from computer model.
EC2 DESIGN TOOL
WORKED EXAMPLES Howes Atkinson Crowder LLP
Copyright 2009 HAC
HAC-PRO 1 - 5 - 2
Full To Brim Lvl
Normal Lvl
Surcharge
qs qe qaw qw-ult qw-serv
qaw = additional pressure due
to Ground Water
or
70
EXAM 2 / 13
Questions
Geotechnical and External Effects
1 What is a reasonable K factor (Ke) to apply to the external earth to give horizontal forces
For a granular soil, Ke is usually taken as 0.5
2 How does ground water affect and combine with the soil forces
Add water as a separate load and give it a density of 10 x (1 - Ke) and a K value of 1.0.
3 What factors need to be considered when assessing surcharge value
Compaction forces, vehicle loads, plant slabs, raft loads.
4 What Pile settlement values should be chosen in relation to the SWL in clay and in granular ground
A settlement of 3 to 4mm per Safe Working Load is normally proved in pile tests.
5 How much relief can the external earth and water loads give to the design of a full tank
None
6 What FOS should be applied to uplift when resting on the ground
It should now be based on 1.1 x Uplift Forces - 0.9 x Down Forces.
7 What can be a problem with achieving a tension resistance from piles
It may be difficult to mobilise enough friction before the pile reaches a refusal in dense gravels.
8 What are the implications of aggressive chemicals on the concrete
Increased cover and cement content, combination mixes and lower water cement ratio
9 What publications are used if the soil is classified as AC
BS EN 206 - 1, BS8500 and BRE Special Digest 1 : 2005 Concrete in aggressive ground
10 What cover is required if the soil is classified as AC
50mm if cast against formwork and 75mm if cast against the ground
11 What other protection is often required for high AC values
Low permeability formwork may be required for AC-4 and AC-5 categories
Show Answers
WORKED EXAMPLE Howes Atkinson Crowder LLP
Copyright 2009 HAC
EC2 DESIGN TOOL
HAC-PRO 1 - 5 - 2
71
EXAM 3 / 13
Rectangular Tank
Analysis Using "Moments and Reactions For Rectangular Plates" by W. T. Moody
For Automatic Design:- L / H or W / H must be :- 0.5 or 1 or 1.5 or 2 or 3
Length = 16 m Width = 12 m Height = 8 m =
Panel 1 L / H = 16 / 8 = 2.00
Panel 2 L / H = 12 / 8 = 1.50
All Actions are considered to be Permanent (Gk) except Surcharge which is a Lead Variable (Qk)
All Actions are considered Fixed and Direct. All loads are the full characteristic values.
The design must ensure that the full to brim case is a reversible service limit state
Full To Brim case applies a reduced Partial Safety Factor and a more relaxed Leakage Class
Permanent Loads are accurately definable so Gksup = Gkinf
Characteristic Loads are used for serviceability design
Max Service Wmm
Actions - Fixed and Direct Ult Hydrostatic
U1 U2 U3 Ratios 1a 1b
Gk Self Weight 1.35 1.35 1.00 ho H ho/H Acc Gen
Internal Water at Normal level 1.35 7000 600 11.7 0.2
Internal Water at Top Of Tank 1.20 8000 600 13.3 0.3
External Earth & Water 1.35 5333 600 8.9 0.2
Qk External Surcharge 1.50 5333 600 8.9 0.2
Internal Actions Coefficients are interpolated between 0.667 H values and 1.0 H values
Design Level Gk Depth = 0.875 H Loading
Pressure at base = 10 x 1.00 x 0.875 x 8 = 70.0 kN/m S U
1.0 1.35
Panel 1 Mv at Base = 0.0701 x 70.0 x 8 x 8 = 313.98 423.88 kNm / m
Mv at mid ht = -0.0138 x 70.0 x 8 x 8 = -61.98 -83.68 kNm / m
Rv Max at Top = 0.0000 x 70.0 x 8 = 0 0 kN / m
Rv Max at Base = 0.4053 x 70.0 x 8 = 226.95 306.39 kN / m
Mh at Sides = 0.0480 x 70.0 x 8 x 8 = 215.19 290.51 kNm / m
Mh at Mid - Span = -0.0207 x 70.0 x 8 x 8 = -92.87 -125.4 kNm / m
Rh Max at Sides = 0.2191 x 70.0 x 8 = 122.69 165.63 kN / m
Panel 2 Mv at Base = 0.0500 x 70.0 x 8 x 8 = 223.79 302.12 kNm / m
Mv at mid ht = -0.0130 x 70.0 x 8 x 8 = -58.35 -78.77 kNm / m
Rv Max at Top = 0.0000 x 70.0 x 8 = 0 0 kN / m
Rv Max at Base = 0.3661 x 70.0 x 8 = 205.01 276.76 kN / m
Mh at Sides = 0.0342 x 70.0 x 8 x 8 = 153.12 206.71 kNm / m
Mh at Mid - Span = -0.0163 x 70.0 x 8 x 8 = -73 -98.55 kNm / m
Rh Max at Sides = 0.2199 x 70.0 x 8 = 123.16 166.27 kN / m
Full To Brim Loads Gk Depth = 1.000 H Loading
Pressure at base = 10 x 1.00 x 1.000 x 8 = 80.0 kN/m S U
1.0 1.20
Panel 1 Mv at Base = 0.0845 x 80.0 x 8 x 8 = 432.64 519.17 kNm / m
Mv at mid ht = -0.0159 x 80.0 x 8 x 8 = -81.41 -97.69 kNm / m
Rv Max at Top = 0.0000 x 80.0 x 8 = 0 0 kN / m
Rv Max at Base = 0.4564 x 80.0 x 8 = 292.1 350.52 kN / m
Mh at Sides = 0.0644 x 80.0 x 8 x 8 = 329.73 395.67 kNm / m
Mh at Mid - Span = -0.0276 x 80.0 x 8 x 8 = -141.3 -169.6 kNm / m
Rh Max at Sides = 0.2564 x 80.0 x 8 = 164.1 196.92 kN / m
Panel 2 Mv at Base = 0.0584 x 80.0 x 8 x 8 = 299.01 358.81 kNm / m
Mv at mid ht = -0.0143 x 80.0 x 8 x 8 = -73.22 -87.86 kNm / m
Rv Max at Top = 0.0000 x 80.0 x 8 = 0 0 kN / m
Rv Max at Base = 0.4055 x 80.0 x 8 = 259.52 311.42 kN / m
Mh at Sides = 0.0433 x 80.0 x 8 x 8 = 221.7 266.04 kNm / m
Mh at Mid - Span = -0.0214 x 80.0 x 8 x 8 = -109.6 -131.5 kNm / m
Rh Max at Sides = 0.2542 x 80.0 x 8 = 162.69 195.23 kN / m
Howes Atkinson Crowder LLP
Top
Copyright 2009 HAC
Free
0.158
Free Top
Class
Hydro
Factor
Hydro
Full Depth
1c
HAC-PRO 1 - 5 - 2
EC2 DESIGN TOOL
Factor
WORKED EXAMPLE
72
EXAM 4 / 13
External Actions
Dry Earth Gk Depth = 0.667 H Loading = K = 0.5
Pressure at base Dry Soil 18 x 0.50 x 0.667 x 8 = 48.0 kN/m
S U
1.0 1.35
Panel 1 Mv at Base = 0.0461 x 48.0 x 8 x 8 = 141.69 191.28 kNm / m
Mv at mid ht = -0.0104 x 48.0 x 8 x 8 = -31.96 -43.15 kNm / m
Rv Max at Top = 0.0000 x 48.0 x 8 = 0 0 kN / m
Rv Max at Base = 0.3202 x 48.0 x 8 = 123.02 166.07 kN / m
Mh at Sides = 0.0208 x 48.0 x 8 x 8 = 63.93 86.305 kNm / m
Mh at Mid - Span = -0.0093 x 48.0 x 8 x 8 = -28.58 -38.59 kNm / m
Rh Max at Sides = 0.1570 x 48.0 x 8 = 60.318 81.429 kN / m
Panel 2 Mv at Base = 0.0359 x 48.0 x 8 x 8 = 110.34 148.96 kNm / m
Mv at mid ht = -0.0109 x 48.0 x 8 x 8 = -33.5 -45.23 kNm / m
Rv Max at Top = 0.0000 x 48.0 x 8 = 0 0 kN / m
Rv Max at Base = 0.3005 x 48.0 x 8 = 115.45 155.86 kN / m
Mh at Sides = 0.0190 x 48.0 x 8 x 8 = 58.397 78.836 kNm / m
Mh at Mid - Span = -0.0078 x 48.0 x 8 x 8 = -23.97 -32.36 kNm / m
Rh Max at Sides = 0.1629 x 48.0 x 8 = 62.585 84.49 kN / m
Extra Due To Water Gk Depth = 0.667 H Loading = Ke = 0.5
Note Equivalent Density For Additional Water = 10 - (10 x Ke) = 10 - 5 = 5 kN/m
Pressure at base Extra Due to Water 5 x 1.00 x 0.667 x 8 = 26.7 kN/m
S U
1.0 1.35
Panel 1 Mv at Base = 0.0461 x 26.7 x 8 x 8 = 78.717 106.27 kNm / m
Mv at mid ht = -0.0104 x 26.7 x 8 x 8 = -17.76 -23.97 kNm / m
Rv Max at Top = 0.0000 x 26.7 x 8 = 0 0 kN / m
Rv Max at Base = 0.3202 x 26.7 x 8 = 68.343 92.264 kN / m
Mh at Sides = 0.0208 x 26.7 x 8 x 8 = 35.516 47.947 kNm / m
Mh at Mid - Span = -0.0093 x 26.7 x 8 x 8 = -15.88 -21.44 kNm / m
Rh Max at Sides = 0.1570 x 26.7 x 8 = 33.51 45.239 kN / m
Panel 2 Mv at Base = 0.0359 x 26.7 x 8 x 8 = 61.3 82.755 kNm / m
Mv at mid ht = -0.0109 x 26.7 x 8 x 8 = -18.61 -25.13 kNm / m
Rv Max at Top = 0.0000 x 26.7 x 8 = 0 0 kN / m
Rv Max at Base = 0.3005 x 26.7 x 8 = 64.139 86.587 kN / m
Mh at Sides = 0.0190 x 26.7 x 8 x 8 = 32.443 43.798 kNm / m
Mh at Mid - Span = -0.0078 x 26.7 x 8 x 8 = -13.32 -17.98 kNm / m
Rh Max at Sides = 0.1629 x 26.7 x 8 = 34.769 46.939 kN / m
Surcharge Qk Depth = 0.667 H Loading = Ke = 0.5
Pressure at base Surcharge 10 x 0.50 = 5.0 kN/m
S U
1.0 1.50
Panel 1 Mv at Base = 0.1184 x 5.0 x 8 x 8 = 37.888 56.832 kNm / m
Mv at mid ht = -0.0296 x 5.0 x 8 x 8 = -9.472 -14.21 kNm / m
Rv Max at Top = 0.0000 x 5.0 x 8 = 0 0 kN / m
Rv Max at Base = 0.6149 x 5.0 x 8 = 24.596 36.894 kN / m
Mh at Sides = 0.0753 x 5.0 x 8 x 8 = 24.096 36.144 kNm / m
Mh at Mid - Span = -0.0271 x 5.0 x 8 x 8 = -8.672 -13.01 kNm / m
Rh Max at Sides = 0.4093 x 5.0 x 8 = 16.372 24.558 kN / m
Panel 2 Mv at Base = 0.0835 x 5.0 x 8 x 8 = 26.72 40.08 kNm / m
Mv at mid ht = -0.0255 x 5.0 x 8 x 8 = -8.16 -12.24 kNm / m
Rv Max at Top = 0.0000 x 5.0 x 8 = 0 0 kN / m
Rv Max at Base = 0.5438 x 5.0 x 8 = 21.752 32.628 kN / m
Mh at Sides = 0.0617 x 5.0 x 8 x 8 = 19.744 29.616 kNm / m
Mh at Mid - Span = -0.0271 x 5.0 x 8 x 8 = -8.672 -13.01 kNm / m
Rh Max at Sides = 0.4133 x 5.0 x 8 = 16.532 24.798 kN / m
Howes Atkinson Crowder LLP
Factor
UDL
Copyright 2009 HAC
Factor
Hydro
Hydro
Factor
Hydro
Hydro
UDL
HAC-PRO 1 - 5 - 2
WORKED EXAMPLE
EC2 DESIGN TOOL
73
EXAM 5 / 13
External Actions Cont
Combination Of All Three External Actions
Service Ultimate Fundamental
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.35 1.35 1.50
Earth Water Surch Earth Water Surch
Panel 1 Mv at Base = 141.7 78.7 37.9 = 258.3 191.3 106.3 56.8 = 354.4 kNm / m
Mv at mid ht = -32.0 -17.8 -9.5 = -59.2 -43.2 -24.0 -14.2 = -81.3 kNm / m
Rv Max at Top = 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 kN / m
Rv Max at Base = 123.0 68.3 24.6 = 216.0 166.1 92.3 36.9 = 295.2 kN / m
Mh at Sides = 63.9 35.5 24.1 = 123.5 86.3 47.9 36.1 = 170.4 kNm / m
Mh at Mid - Span = -28.6 -15.9 -8.7 = -53.1 -38.6 -21.4 -13.0 = -73.0 kNm / m
Rh Max at Sides = 60.3 33.5 16.4 = 110.2 81.4 45.2 24.6 = 151.2 kN / m
Panel 2 Mv at Base = 110.3 61.3 26.7 = 198.4 149.0 82.8 40.1 = 271.8 kNm / m
Mv at mid ht = -33.5 -18.6 -8.2 = -60.3 -45.2 -25.1 -12.2 = -82.6 kNm / m
Rv Max at Top = 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 = 0.0 kN / m
Rv Max at Base = 115.4 64.1 21.8 = 201.3 155.9 86.6 32.6 = 275.1 kN / m
Mh at Sides = 58.4 32.4 19.7 = 110.6 78.8 43.8 29.6 = 152.3 kNm / m
Mh at Mid - Span = -24.0 -13.3 -8.7 = -46.0 -32.4 -18.0 -13.0 = -63.4 kNm / m
Rh Max at Sides = 62.6 34.8 16.5 = 113.9 84.5 46.9 24.8 = 156.2 kN / m
Slab Design Gk Unfactored Values
Self Wt 24 x 0.6 = 14.4 kN / m
NWL Loading 10 x 7 = 70 kN / m
FTB Loading 10 x 8 = 80 kN / m
Pile Spacing 4.00 m SW Water
NWL Loading 14.4 + 70 = 84.4 kN / m 0.171 0.829
FTB Loading 14.4 + 80 = 94.4 kN / m 0.153 0.847
Design Water Level Analysis
Load per Width of Panel 84.4 x 4 = 337.6 kN / m L / F
Load per Span 337.6 x 4 = 1350 kN Ult = 1823 kN 1.35
Support Moment 1350 x 4 / 12 = 450.1 kNm / Panel 112.5 / m
Column Strip 450.1 x ( ) Use 0.7 = 315 kNm
Middle Strip 450.1 x ( ) Use 0.3 = 135 kNm
Span Moment 1350 x 4 / 24 = 225 kNm / Panel
Column Strip 225 x ( ) Use 0.55 = 124 kNm
Middle Strip 225 x ( ) Use 0.45 = 101 kNm
Full To Brim Analysis
Load per Width of Panel 94.4 x 4 = 377.6 kN / m kNm / Panel L / F
Load per Span 377.6 x 4 = 1510 kN Ult = 1847 kN 1.223
Support Moment 1510 x 4 / 12 = 503.5 kNm / Panel 125.9 / m
Column Strip 503.5 x ( ) Use 0.7 = 352 kNm x 1.35 = 476 kNm
Middle Strip 503.5 x ( ) Use 0.3 = 151 kNm x 1.35 = 204 kNm
Span Moment 1510 x 4 / 24 = 252 kNm / Panel
Column Strip 252 x ( ) Use 0.55 = 138 kNm x 1.35 = 187 kNm
Middle Strip 252 x ( ) Use 0.45 = 113 kNm x 1.35 = 153 kNm
Note that the moments from the independent base slab analysis will rarely match the panel base fixed moments
In order to give realistic values, the reinforcement will be calculated from the results of a Grillage / Finite Element Analysis
Copyright 2009 HAC
Howes Atkinson Crowder LLP
0.6 to 0.8
0.6 to 0.8
0.2 to 0.4
0.5 to 0.7
0.2 to 0.4
0.2 to 0.4
EC2 DESIGN TOOL
0.6 to 0.8
0.3 to 0.5
HAC-PRO 1 - 5 - 2
WORKED EXAMPLE
74
EXAM 6 / 13
Grillage Analysis
Input and Output Diagrams For Load Combination S1
SW + Full To Brim
Elements are at 1m ctrs
Loading / Element
50% of Vertical Load is applied
onto slab in each direction
SW is calculated by program but density
is 50% Normal to avoid taking the weight twice
Shear / Element
kN
Howes Atkinson Crowder LLP
Copyright 2009 HAC
EC2 DESIGN TOOL
WORKED EXAMPLE
HAC-PRO 1 - 5 - 2
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
-229 kN
280 kN
217 kN
-167 kN
162 kN
230 kN
191 kN
75
EXAM 7 / 13
Grillage Analysis
Output For Load Combination S1
SW + Full To Brim
Elements are at 1m ctrs
Moments / Element
kNm
Negative Denotes Tension on Ext Face
Axial / Element
kN
Negative Denotes Tension
Copyright 2009 HAC
HAC-PRO 1 - 5 - 2
Howes Atkinson Crowder LLP WORKED EXAMPLE
EC2 DESIGN TOOL
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
-83.7 kNm
-88.2 kNm
-92.4 kNm
368 kNm
-136 kNm
215 kNm
316 kNm
-162 kNm
-105 kNm
216 kNm
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
381 kN 347 kN
-242 kN
-168 kN -148 kN
368 kN
-226 kN
-152 kN
-154 kN
381 kN
368 kN
-151 kN
-195 kN
-168 kN
-97 kN
76
EXAM 8 / 13
Grillage Analysis
Output For Load Combination S1
SW + Full To Brim
Elements are at 1m ctrs
Displacements
Note: Value for
Panel 1 under
NWL = 12mm
Pile Loads
Copyright 2009 HAC
Howes Atkinson Crowder LLP WORKED EXAMPLE
HAC-PRO 1 - 5 - 2
EC2 DESIGN TOOL
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
6.28 mm
6.11 mm
6.11 mm
6.11 mm
18.5 mm
6.11 mm
6.35 mm
10 10 10 10 10
10 10 10 10 10
10 10 10 10 10
10 10 10 10 10
1221 kN 1221 kN 1252 kN 1259 kN 1252 kN
1239 kN 1239 kN 1255 kN 1270 kN 1255 kN
1239 kN 1239 kN 1255 kN 1270 kN 1255 kN
1221 kN 1221 kN 1252 kN 1259 kN 1252 kN
77
EXAM 9 / 13
Combinations
= 1.0
Service S1
S2
S3 Surcharge
= 1.35 1.35 1.0 1.5
Ultimate U1 SW
U2 SW
U3 SW Surcharge
Forces v = Shr Stress N/mm n = Axial Stress N/mm V = Shr kN N = Axial kN M = Mom kNm
Some FEA programs generate output as stress Values per element width or per m for FEA
Values are arranged so they can be Copied and Pasted Special as Values into the MAIN sheet
Walls Panel 1 H = 600 Panel 2 H = 600
S1 S2 S3 U1 U2 U3 S1 S2 S3 U1 U2 U3
Vert Base v
n
V 229 220 183 275 297 247 230 170 167 276 230 225
N -168 -137 150 -202 -185 203 -148 -124 140 -178 -167 189
M 368 296 -225 442 400 -304 215 209 -173 258 282 -234
Vert Span v
n
V 30 20 20 36 27 27 20 10 20 24 14 27
N 30 30 70 36 41 95 20 20 60 24 27 81
M -92 -67 62 -110 -90 84 -84 -62 58 -101 -84 78
Hor Corn v
n
V 162 125 115 194 169 155 162 125 115 194 169 155
N -154 -123 110 -185 -166 149 -154 -110 110 -185 -149 149
M 316 205 -131 379 277 -177 316 205 -131 379 277 -177
Hor Span v
n
V 20 10 5 24 14 7 20 20 5 24 27 7
N -97 -90 40 -116 -122 54 -158 -92 56 -190 -124 76
M -162 -86 57 -194 -116 77 -151 -69 35 -181 -93 47
Base Slab X Dir H = 600 Y Dir
S1 S2 S3 U1 U2 U3 S1 S2 S3 U1 U2 U3
At Wall v
n
V 280 212 130 336 286 176 230 205 120 276 277 162
N -242 -215 184 -290 -290 248 -195 -172 163 -234 -232 220
M 368 300 -225 442 405 -304 215 209 -173 258 282 -234
Column v
Strip at n
Pile T Pi 1461 1342 -404 1753 1812 -545 1461 1300 -404 1753 1754 -545
N -226 -200 172 -271 -270 232 -145 -121 127 -174 -163 171
M 216 180 -50 259 243 -68 216 180 -40 259 243 -54
Middle v
Strip at n
Supp T V 80 70 30 96 95 41 90 80 50 108 108 68
N -226 -200 172 -271 -270 232 -145 -121 127 -174 -163 171
M 50 45 -50 60 61 -68 88 66 -50 106 89 -68
Span v
Strips B n
V 50 45 30 60 61 41 50 50 50 60 68 68
N -226 -200 172 -271 -270 232 -145 -121 127 -174 -163 171
M -136 -120 92 -163 -162 124 -88 -80 40 -106 -108 54
Punching VED 1270 1167 -351 1565 1575 -474 1270 1130 -351 1565 1526 -474
Water at NWL
Water at FTB
Howes Atkinson Crowder LLP
1.2
Copyright 2009 HAC
Water at FTB
1.0
1.35
PRO 1 - 5 - 2
SW
SW
Water at NWL
SW
WORKED EXAMPLE
EC2 DESIGN TOOL
1.0
Earth & Water at GL
Earth & Water at GL
1.0
78
EXAM 10 / 13
Reinforcement
All Reinforcement and Section Compliance is calculated and displayed via the MAIN sheet
Typical Calculations Input
Shear, Axial and Moments Above values are copied and pasted into the MAIN sheet
Shrinkage This sheet allows the designer to add additional explanation
and derive actual restraint values..
The values are copied and pasted (values only) into the MAIN sheet
Walls Shrinkage Data Formwork Fmwk Ply
Faces & Rel Humidity Rh 1 & 95
Edge Restraint Values T1 value or Auto T1 Auto
Seasonal Temp drop T2 20
1 Horizontal Edge Restraint Wall Restraint type Restr Edge
Ref Restraint Diagram H Edge 3 Day curing restraint R1 0.60
adjusted to suit C660 Restr 28 Day / T2 curing restraint R2 0.60
Base Long Term drying restraint R3 0.30
2 Horizontal Edge Restraint Wall Restraint type Restr Edge
Ref Restraint Diagram H Edge 3 Day curing restraint R1 0.35
adjusted to suit C660 Restr 28 Day / T2 curing restraint R2 0.35
Mid Ht Long Term drying restraint R3 0.15
3 Vertical Edge Restraint Wall Restraint type Restr Edge
Ref Restraint Diagram V Edge 3 Day curing restraint R1 0.35
adjusted to suit C660 Restr 28 Day / T2 curing restraint R2 0.35
Base Long Term drying restraint R3 0.00
Slab Shrinkage Data Formwork Fmwk Grnd
Faces & Rel Humidity Rh 1 & 95
End Restraint Values T1 value or Auto T1 Auto
Seasonal Temp drop T2 15
4 End restraint Slab Restraint type Restr End
Assuming near full restraint End 3 Day curing restraint R1 0.77
As an Example Restr 28 Day / T2 curing restraint R2 0.77
High Long Term drying restraint R3 0.77
5 End Restraint Slab Restraint type Restr End
According To Pile Siffness End 3 Day curing restraint R1 0.20
More Realistic Restr 28 Day / T2 curing restraint R2 0.20
See Below Piles Long Term drying restraint R3 0.20
Actual End Restraint Offered By Piles
Free Strain due to T2 = 15 deg & alpha = 12 = 180
Maximum Restrained Strain = 0.65 x 180 = 117 `
Free Shrinkage over 8 m due to T2 = 15 deg & alpha = 12 = 1.44 mm
Free Shrinkage over 4 m due to T2 = 15 deg & alpha = 12 = 0.72 mm
Pile Resistance = 150 kN per mm Slab = 12 m x 600 mm
Force at Centre = 4 x 150 x 1.44 = 864 kN
4 x 150 x 0.72 = 432 kN = 1296 kN
Average Restrained Stress 0.65 x 1296 / ( 12 x 600 ) = 0.18 N / mm
Average Restrained Strain = Stress / (Es / MR28) = 0.18 / ( 200 / 6.09 ) = 5
Therefore Maximum End Restraint Factor R = 5 / 117 = 0.047 Adopt 0.2
WORKED EXAMPLE Howes Atkinson Crowder LLP
Copyright 2009 HAC
HAC-PRO 1 - 5 - 2
EC2 DESIGN TOOL
79
EXAM 11 / 13
Finite Element Analysis - SW + Full to Brim
Horizontal in Walls
Lengthways in slab
Vertical in Walls
Crossways in Slab
Copyright 2009 HAC
HAC-PRO 1 - 5 - 2
Howes Atkinson Crowder LLP
EC2 DESIGN TOOL
WORKED EXAMPLE
MX (local)
kNm/ m
<= -275
-247
-220
-192
-164
-136
-109
-81.1
-53.3
-25.6
2.1
29.8
57.5
85.3
113
141
>= 168
MY (local)
kNm/ m
<= -389
-357
-325
-293
-260
-228
-196
-164
-132
-99.5
-67.3
-35.1
-2.93
29.3
61.4
93.6
>= 126
80
EXAM 12 / 13
Worked Examples Cont.
2 Circular Tank
Design a concrete tank 40m dia x 6m high cast on ground with Subgrade Reaction 10kN/m2 / mm
Base Slab slopes 2m towards a 2m deep central sump
Service design water level is full to brim
Wall is either fixed or hinged to the base slab
Other criteria are as for rectangular tank
Use Coefficients from provided charts
Consider how much base fixity can be generated
Consider the effects of high tension on reinforcement stresses and crack widths
Consider thermal implications
Consider how to reinforce the main base and the hopper bottom
For a 300 thick wall
For a Fixed Base
Hoop Tension per M width = 434 kN
Vertical Moment at Base = -72 kNm
Max Reverse Vertical Moment = 21 kNm
For a Hinged Base
Hoop Tension per M width = 623 kN
Vertical Moment in Wall = 33 kNm
EC2 DESIGN TOOL
HAC-PRO 1 - 5 - 2
Howes Atkinson Crowder LLP
Copyright 2009 HAC
WORKED EXAMPLE
Serv Lvl
qw-serv
81
EXAM 13 / 13
Circular Tank - Finite Element Analysis
Vertical Moments in Wall M at base = - 58 kNm Mspan = 22 kNm
Hoop Tension in Wall Max Stress = 1.576 N/mm = 472 kN for a 300mm Thick Wall
Copyright 2009 HAC
HAC-PRO 1 - 5 - 2
Howes Atkinson Crowder LLP
EC2 DESIGN TOOL
WORKED EXAMPLE
MX (local)
kNm/ m
<= -30
-26.8
-23.5
-20.2
-17
-13.7
-10.5
-7.21
-3.95
-0.686
2.57
5.83
9.09
12.4
15.6
18.9
>= 22.1
SY (local)
N/ mm2
<= 0.037
0.134
0.231
0.328
0.425
0.522
0.619
0.716
0.813
0.91
1.01
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.49
>= 1.59
82
RESTR 1
Control Of Cracking Due To Restrained Shrinkage Ref:- EC2 Pt 3 & CIRIA C660
Free Shrinkage Strain Types
Thermal T x Temperature Drop x Coefficient of Expansion which depends on Aggregate Type
Autogenous Ag Due to the chemical reaction causing a reduction in volume.
Drying Cd Due to the drying out of the concrete over the long term
Restraint Types
Edge Induces cracking strain due to restraint at side of new pour.
End Induces cracking strain due to restraint at ends or from piles or ground friction.
Internal Induces cracking strain due to restraint caused by internal temperature differentials.
Restraint Values
R1, R2, R3 R varies between 1 for Full and 0 for None. Suffix denotes Shrinkage Stage - see below.
Creep Factor K1
K1 Value Due to relaxation of the concrete under load. Fixed at 0.65 at all stages.
Restrained Strain
+ +
Key Data Affecting Shrinkage and Strain Capacity
Example Values
30 / 37 Ult Microstrain Capacity Agg Exp
LT Drying Period 60 Yrs Aggregate 3 Day 28 Day LT Factor
LT Strength at 60 Yrs Basalt 63 90 98 0.826 10
LT Strain at 60 Yrs Default 76 109 119 1 12
Creep K1 = 0.65 Dolomite 85 122 133 1.119 9
R1 = 0.32 Flint 65 93 102 0.853 12
R2 = 0.40 Gabbro 75 108 118 0.991 10
R3 = 0.19 Granite 75 108 118 0.991 10
Aggregate = Limestone 85 122 133 1.119 9
3 Day = 76 Quartzite 76 109 119 1 14
28 Day = 109 Sandstone 108 155 169 1.422 12.5
LT = 119.1 Gain beyond 28
Agg Factor = 1 is within Drying
Exp = 12 If Drying > Gain
Variation Of Values According To Strength and Age
At 28 Days Age Factors
Concrete Strength Fck 30 3D 28D LT
Strain Capacity 109 0.698 1 1.092
Autogenous Strain 33 x 0.448 1 1.531
Drying Shrinkage Strain 1 Age 0 0 1.000
Fctm N/mm2 2.90 Factor 0.598 1 1.174
Modular Ratio 6.09 1.167 1 0.930
Note: If drying shrinkage is based on Fck = 30 N/mm the reduction where Fck = 32 N/mm is < 3%.
CIRIA C660 LT Values
C660 advises using the 28 Day Strain Capacity, Tensile Strength and Modular Ratio for the Long Term (LT) stage check.
This program allows the full LT values to be displayed and used for information and to demonstrate the effects.
1.167
30 / 37
1.000
1.000
1.250
0.976 1.000
1.000
1.000 1.073
k1 R3 Drying
1.100
15 50 33
35 / 45 40 / 50
1.067 1.333
1.040 1.015
0.942
1.500
28 Days to LT
Strength Factors
32 / 40
0.887
1.130 1.030 1.080
EC2 DESIGN TOOL
THERMAL, SHRINKAGE, RESTRAINT & CREEP
Default
Autogenous
Up To 3 Days
k1 R1 (T1 + Ag1) k1 R2 (T2 + Ag2)
HAC-PRO 1 - 5 - 2
3 Days to 28 days
Howes Atkinson Crowder LLP
Copyright 2009 HAC
Strength
83
RESTR 2
Shrinkage Cont.
Thermal Strain Due To T1 Curing Temperature Drop
Fresh concrete heats up as a result of the chemical reaction.
It is called heat of hydration.
This process takes about 24 hours to reach a peak temperature.
The rise is dependant on the placing temperature,
cement content, formwork and section thickness.
It then cools down to the ambient temperature over the next
2 to 6 days and shrinks.
The rate at which it cools down depends on the type of formwork
and strike time and external temperature.
Shrinkage Calculations assume the cooling is complete at 3 days.
Thermal strain Due To T2 Seasonal Temperature Drop
T2 is normally taken as 20 deg for exposed structures and 15 deg for buried structures.
The design method in this program conservatively assumes that T2 drop will occur evenly between 3 days and 28 days
Drying Shrinkage For RH% Between 60 & 95 Value for RH% = 100 = 0 ho = H x (2 / Exp Faces)
Based On Data Basic Value
Control Sheet Value Used
RH% 85 kh 0.85 0.75 0.71 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70
Period - Yrs 60 432.1 60 365 321 302 296 295 293 290 288 286 281 276 271
Fck - N/mm 30 362.1 70 306 269 253 248 247 245 243 242 240 236 231 227
Depth H 600 269 80 227 200 188 185 183 182 181 179 178 175 172 169
Exp Faces 1 212.7 85 180 158 149 146 145 144 143 142 141 138 136 133 138.4
u = 2 / Exp 2 149.4 90 126 111 105 102 102 101 100 100 99 97 95 94
ho = 1200 79 95 66 58 55 54 54 53 53 52 52 51 50 49
Example From Table = 138 From charts or formula = 138.4
LT Strain = Maximum of:- (LT Autogenous - 28 Day Autogenous) & Drying Shrinkage = 138.4
600 500 400
THERMAL, SHRINKAGE, RESTRAINT & CREEP
HAC-PRO 1 - 5 - 2
EC2 DESIGN TOOL
700 300
Howes Atkinson Crowder LLP
Copyright 2009 HAC
200 1000 ho 800 900 1200 1600 1400
Drying Shrinkage Microstrain Against
ho = H x (2 / Exp Faces) For Values of RH%
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
ho
60% 70% 80%
85% 90% 95%
Example
cd
Drying Shrinkage Microstrain against RH%
For ho = H x (2 / Exp Faces) = 200 to 1600
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95
RH
200 300 400 600
800 1000 1200 1400
1600 Example
cd
Effect of Formwork on Temperature Rise in
500mm thick walls (for 350 kg / m3 CEM 1) Ref
C660 Fig 4.2
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Days
T
Steel 18mm Ply
84
RESTR 3
Drying Shrinkage Cont.
Drying Shrinkage Equations Ref EN 1992-1-1
Equ B.11 Basic strain cd,0 = 0.85 x (220 + 110 x ds1) x exp(- ds2 x fcm / 10) x 10E-6 x RH
Equ B.12 RH = 1.55 x (1 - (RH% / 100) exp(VALUE) = 2.718
VALUE
For Class S ds1 = 3 ds2 = 0.13 Note: fcm = fck + 8 N/mm
N ds1 = 4 ds2 = 0.12
R ds1 = 6 ds2 = 0.11
Equ 3.9 Strain at Time t days cd(t) = ds(t,ts) x kh x cd,0 ts = start time in days
If Exp Faces = 2, ho = h If Exp Faces = 1, ho = 2h
If ho >=500, kh = 0.7
If ho <=100, kh = 1.0 Otherwise, kh = 0.7 + (0.3 x (500 - ho) / 400)
Equ 3.10 ds(t,ts) = (t - ts) / ( (t - ts) + (0.04 x ho) ) = t / (t +( 0.04 x ho) ) If ts is taken as 0
Fck = 30 N / mm Drying Period = 60 Yrs = Days 21915
THERMAL, SHRINKAGE, RESTRAINT & CREEP
HAC-PRO 1 - 5 - 2
EC2 DESIGN TOOL
Copyright 2009 HAC
Howes Atkinson Crowder LLP
Drying Shrinkage Microstrain Against RH%
For ho = H x 2 / (Exp Faces) = 200 to 1600, Fck and Drying Period
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95
RH
200 300 400 600 800
1000 1200 1400 1600 Example
cd
85
RESTR 4
Edge Restraint Ref EN 1992 - 3 - 2006 Annex L Fig L1
H = L =
Single values within zones are constant throughout. Multiple values denote a varying restraint.
Values on the edge of a zone or outline show that the restraint varies linearly towards another zone or value.
Horizontal Central Zone Centreline Values For Isolated and Sequential Cases
L / H These values are EC2 Pt 3 Fig L1 values x Factor / 0.5
1 and are multiplied by L / 4.8 if L < 4.8m
2
3 The values are a minimum of 0.25 x Creep Factor / 0.5
4 if construction joints are included. (BS8007 only)
>=8
2.000 Design Values for chosen case are shown in bold
Vertical Central Zone Values - Infill Case Where L <= 2H R = CF (1 - L / 2H) N/A
Vertical Central Zone Values - End Case Where L <= H R = CF (1 - L / H) N/A
VERY IMPORTANT NOTE
These values and diagrams were previously included in BS8007 and are now included in EN1992 - 3
EC2 Pt3 Fig L1 includes a Creep Factor of 0.5 (Ref A.5). C660 uses a creep factor of 0.65 with unfactored R values.
If the published chart values are used with a C660 calculation:-
Multiply all values by (1 / .65 = 1.54) and use K1 = 0.65 in C660 calculations Note:- 0.5 x 1.54 = 0.77
It is vital that the designer makes it absolutely clear what has been done.
The following C660 method shows the restraint is generally < 0.77 unless the wall / base section areas ratio is very small.
0.50
0.3
0.5
0.00
0.5
0.5
1.000 All
0
At Top At Base
0.5
Diagram Displays
0 0.5
L / H =
L / 4.8 =
4.000
Hor Factor 3.333
0.50 Maximum Factor
Copyright 2009 HAC
With Construction Joints 3.200
0.5 x H = 2.000
0.2 x H =
Type of Construction
HAC-PRO 1 - 5 - 2
EC2 DESIGN TOOL
Howes Atkinson Crowder LLP
16.000
0.2 x L = 1.600
8.000
Design =
Design =
0.5 0.05
Sequential
No
THERMAL, SHRINKAGE, RESTRAINT & CREEP
Wall Restraint Factors h = Horiz, v = Vert
0.12h
0h
0.25h
0.37h
0.5h
0.5v
0.25v
0h
0.25h
0.5h
2.4 m 11.2 m 2.4 m
5.6 m
3.2 m
12.8 m 3.2 m
1.6 m
0v
0.5v
0v
L
H
Vertical Restraint Zone Horizontal Restraint Zone
86
RESTR 5
Edge Restraint Cont.
Ref C660 Equ 4.6
Restraint at Joint Rj = 1 / ( 1 + ( ( An / Ao ) x ( En / Eo ) )
Where An = Cross Section Area of new concrete pour
Ao = Cross Section Area of old restraining concrete
En = Modulus of Elasticity of new pour concrete (assumed 0.7 x Eo)
Eo = Modulus of Elasticity of old concrete
Example Wall ht = 8 m Base Width = 8 m
H = 0.3 m H = 0.4 m
Ao = 8 x 0.4 = 3.2 m An / Ao = 0.75
An = 8 x 0.3 = 2.4 m En / Eo = 0.7
Rj = 1 / ( + ( 0.75 x 0.7 ) ) = 0.656
Simplified For a wall cast at the edge of a slab An / Ao = hn / ho
Method For a wall cast remote from the edge of a slab An / Ao = hn / 2ho
For a slab cast against an existing slab An / Ao = hn / ho
An / Ao = 0.3 / 0.4 = 0.75
Rj = 1 / ( + ( 0.75 x 0.7 ) ) = 0.66
THESE VALUES DO NOT INCLUDE CREEP
Variation of Horizontal Restraint According To Height Above Base
Ref CIRIA Figure 4.17 and Enborg 2003 This can be compared with the data on previous page
THERMAL, SHRINKAGE, RESTRAINT & CREEP
EC2 DESIGN TOOL
HAC-PRO 1 - 5 - 2
Howes Atkinson Crowder LLP
Copyright 2009 HAC
Proportion of Base Restraint Against Height Above Base
For Various L / H Ratios
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Proportion of Base Restraint
Prop
of
Wall
Height
L / H = 1 L / H = 1.4 L / H = 2 L / H = 3 L / H = 4
L / H = 5 L / H = 6
1
1.4
2
3
4
5
6
87
RESTR 6
End Restraint
Walls can be restrained when a new section is placed between previously cured sections or existing structures.
Slabs can be restrained in a similar way but also by friction, pile stiffness and or passive resistance.
Where the restraint is a robust immovable existing structure R should be = 1.0.
Consequently, it is advisable to try and arrange structures and pours to minimize End Restraints wherever possible.
Note. When a tank is in service or is buried, the liquid retaining faces should not experience any drying shrinkage.
Therefore in those circumstances the design need only consider T1 & Autogenous 1 and T2 and Autogenous 2.
To Calculate Restraint From Piles or Passive Resistance.
1 Establish the sources of Restraint and check at 3 Days or 28 Days or Long Term
2 Using the analysis computer model or manually:-
A Set Ec = the full 28 day value and do not allow for creep coefficient.
The 3 day adjustment factor is 0.86 and the LT factor is 1.07.
Set the correct coeff of expansion
Consider a load case with a 15 degree temperature drop say.
B Restrain the structure horizontally at ends and calculate the restrained stress.
Record the stresses in each direction, which should be uniform.
C Remove all previous restraints
Set the restraint sources to have an elastic force / displacement criteria
For Piles and or Passive Resistance test at 50% of the vertical settlement stiffness.
Record the stresses at the centre and outwardly between restraints.
Multiply these values by 3 Day and LT Ec factors if required.
You will note that the piles offer a cumulative but reducing restraint towards the centre.
D The Restraint Factor R will be:- Stress Due to C / Stress due to B
To Calculate Restraint from Friction
1 Where friction exceeds the tensile strength, no movement can occur so full restraint occurs and R = 1.
2 Establish the coefficient of friction or assume 0.7 say.
3 Establish the fctm in N/mm at 3D, 28D & LT For Fck = 30 N/mm 1.73 2.90 3.40
4 Apply horizontal loads to the slab = Vertical Load x away from each centre line and analyse.
5 Record the stress at each centre line and compare it with the appropriate tensile stress capacity fctm.
6 If k1 (= 0.65) x Stress is more than the appropriate fctm value, the slab cannot slide and Rmax = 1.
7 If k1 (= 0.65) x Stress is less than the appropriate fctm value, Rmax = 0.65 x Stress / fctm
8 Care must be used in calculating the empty condition as the weight of walls must be added.
9 This analysis must be performed using the loads which apply at the stages considered.
10 Therefore, for T2 and Long Term it would be prudent to assume the tank is full.
EC2 DESIGN TOOL
HAC-PRO 1 - 5 - 2
THERMAL, SHRINKAGE, RESTRAINT & CREEP Howes Atkinson Crowder LLP
Copyright 2009 HAC
88
RESTR 7
Using Capacity Charts For R1 & R2 End Restraint R Values based on FOS = 1.0
R1 at 3 Days 3 Day Strain Capacity / (K1 * (3D Autogenous + (T1 x ) ) )
T1 Curing Temp Drop = 29.7 Deg R1 Applied =
R1 Crit End = Reserve R = Cracked
Edge = = Cracked
If R2 = R1 - at 28 Days 28 Day Cap - 3 Day Strain / (K1 * (28D - 3D Autogenous + (T2 x ) ) )
Applied 3 Day Restraint R1 = 0.315 Seasonal Temp Drop 20 Deg
Applied 28 Day Restraint R2 = 0.315 T1 + T2 = 29.7 + 20 = 50
R2 Crit End = Reserve R = Cracked
Edge = = Cracked
(R2-end / R2crit-end) = 0.315 / 0.266 = 1.18 = 28Day Proportion Used-End
(R2-edge / R2crit-edge) = 0.315 / 0.133 = 2.36 = 28Day Proportion Used-Edge
A max value of 1.0 is used from hereon when cracked
0.133 -0.182
Howes Atkinson Crowder LLP
EC2 DESIGN TOOL
0.315
0.266
THERMAL, SHRINKAGE, RESTRAINT & CREEP
HAC-PRO 1 - 5 - 2
0.157
-0.049
0.000
Copyright 2009 HAC
0.315
-0.158
R1crit-End Due To Autogenous1 & T1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
15 20 25 30 35 40 45
T1
R1
Sandstone Limestone & Dolomite
Granite & Gabbro Default & Basalt
Flint & Quartzite Example
28 Day R1=R2crit-End Due To Autogenous
& T1 & T2
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
T1 + T2
R1
=
R2
Sandstone Limestone & Dolomite
Granite & Gabbro Default & Basalt
Flint & Quartzite Example
R1crit-Edge Due To Autogenous1 & T1
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
15 20 25 30 35 40 45
T1
R1
Sandstone
Limestone & Dolomite
Granite & Gabbro
Default & Basalt
Flint & Quartzite
Example
28 Day R1=R2crit-Edge Due To Autogenous
& T1 & T2
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
T1 + T2
R1
=
R2
Sandstone Limestone & Dolomite
Granite & Gabbro Default & Basalt
Flint & Quartzite Example
89
RESTR 8
R3Crit Chart
At Long Term R3 Crit = 0.112
EC2 DESIGN TOOL
HAC-PRO 1 - 5 - 2
Default, Granite, Gabbro & Quartzite Aggregate For RH = 85 % & 1 Exposed Fac
The chart allows a direct reading from the R2 / R2crit proportion without the need for adjusting the
values for the strength gain between 28 Days and Long Term. For an End Restraint, If the section has
cracked at 28 Days, further analysis is irrelevant.
It is acceptably accurate to interpolate within these bands. It can be seen that an accurate assessment
of Relative Humidity has a far greater effect on the value of strain that any loss of accuracy due to
interpolating for ho within the bands.
The bands cover the commonly used %RH values and their spread covers the ho depth range from
400mm to 1600mm. For Edge restraint, R3crit-Edge will be half of these values and if cracked at 28
days use R2 / R2Crit = 1. For other Fck values, divide R3crit by Shrinkage Factor (i.e. 0.942 for Fck =
35), however the capacity increase will be very slight.
Copyright 2009 HAC
THERMAL, SHRINKAGE, RESTRAINT & CREEP Howes Atkinson Crowder LLP
RH = 60%, 70%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95% For ho = 400 to 1600mm
For Specified Aggregate, Fck
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
R2 / R2Crit End
R3Crit
End
Example 95% 95% 90% 90%
85% 85% 80% 80% 70%
70% 60% 60%
90
RESTR 9
End Restraint Crack Development
Long Term Values Used In Example
General MR & Strain Cap & Fctm Values at 60 Yrs
fctm3 is 0.6fctm28 and fctmLT = 1.17fctm28
Cap3 is 0.7Cap28 and CapLT = 1.09Cap28
See adjacent chart for values up to 1000 days.
Cracks occur if Restrained Strain is > Capacity.
A crack will cause a reduction in concrete strain.
End Restraint cracks form at the weakest point.
Crack width = Srmax x Strain based on fctm(t).
Srmax is 2 x bond length x factors + 3.4 x Cover.
Srmax is NOT the End Restraint crack spacing.
Cracks will widen until another crack forms.
At 3 Days - Includes Curing Temperature Drop T1
The stage also includes small autogenous strain.
No cracks occur if the R and T1 are low enough.
The first crack may occur before 3 Days.
Further strain widens the crack before another crack forms.
This process continues until no more cracks form.
At 28 Days - Includes Seasonal Temperature Drop T2
This stage is used to check T2 strain effects.
T2 = 20 for exposed and 15 for buried elements.
Further small autogenous strain occurs.
The strain is checked against the 28 day capacity.
28 Day cracks will be 70% wider than 3 Day cracks.
At Long term - Includes Drying Shrinkage
This shrinkage is due to Autogenous and Drying .
The small amount of autogenous strain is included within the Drying Shrinkage.
The rate of increase in drying shrinkage is slower than the small increase in strain capacity.
70 % of the Drying Strain has occurred after 7 years it takes up to 60 yrs for the process to complete.
If the section is uncracked at 28 Day and Long term it will not have cracked in between.
Drying shrinkage is primarily dependant on the Relative Humidity.
Drying Shrinkage may be ignored where the face is permanently exposed to a liquid.
A Long Term stage crack width will be 17% wider than a 28 Day crack.
Crack Width Scenarios Assuming Strain Increases After First Crack
3D to 28D W + = (Additional Restrained Strain / (28D Cap - 3D Cap ) ) x (Cracked W2 - Cracked W1)
3D to LT W + = (Additional Restrained Strain / (LT Cap - 3D Cap ) ) x (Cracked W3 - Cracked W1)
28D to LT W + = (Additional Restrained Strain / (LT Cap - 28D Cap ) ) x (Cracked W3 - Cracked W2)
Stages 1 1 - 2 2 2 - 3 3
At Which Due to T1 & A1 Due to At Due to At
Cracks 3D T2 & A2 28D Drying LT
Form W1 mm W + mm W2 mm W + mm W3mm
1 No Crack 0 0 0 0 0
2 28 D 0 0 C 0.192 0.026 0.218
3 LT 0 0 0 0 C 0.224
4 28D & LT 0 0 C 0.192 0.032 C 0.224
5 3D C 0.117 0.037 0.154 0.026 0.180
6 3D & 28D C 0.117 0.075 C 0.192 0.026 0.218
7 3D & LT C 0.117 0.037 0.154 0.070 C 0.224
8 3D & 28D & LT C 0.117 0.075 C 0.192 0.032 C 0.224
C660 makes the checks at 3D, 28D and LT. When a crack forms at 3 or 28 Days, it will increase in width (W +) if
there is an increase in strain and capacity. W + will be proportional to the ratio of (restrained strain increase / strain
capacity increase between stages) and the increase in formed crack widths between stages (see below). If the
increase in restrained strain begins to exceed the stage capacity, another crack will form.
EC2 DESIGN TOOL
Copyright 2009 HAC
THERMAL, SHRINKAGE, RESTRAINT & CREEP
HAC-PRO 1 - 5 - 2
Howes Atkinson Crowder LLP
3D 28D
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1 10 100 1000
Fctm(t) / Fctm(28)
Strain (t) Cap / Strain (28) Cap
MR(t) / MR(28)
Strength, Strain Capacity & MR as a Ratio of
Values at 28 Days Against Time in Days
Ratio
Time In Days (t)
MR
Fctm
Strain
Cap
91
RESTR 10
Shrinkage and Restraint Ref C660 Cl 1.4 & 3.2.1 T1 from C660 - Charts or Prog
3 Day Ult (3D ) End 3D x GR / FOS 76.0 Edge 3D x GR x 50% 38.0
28 Day Ult (28D ) 28D / FOS 109.0 28 x 50% 54.5
LT Ult (LT ) LT / FOS 119.1 LT x 50% 59.5
LT-28D Ult (LT-28D ) LT-28D / FOS 10.0 LT-28D x 50% 5.0
Aggregate Strain Factor 3D Autogenous 14.6 2.90
28 Day Cyl Fck N/mm 32.6 6.09
Coeff of Exp x 10
-6
1.73 3.40
3D Modular Ratio 7.11 5.67
Binder Kg/m 350 28 Day Cube Fcu N/mm 37
GGBS % 50 N
PFA % 0 Y
Section Depth H mm PC or SR PC 1.0
60 Yrs 500 1
60 Yrs Creep Coefficient K1 0.65 % RH Value 85
60 Yrs Conc Tension Coeff ct 0.80 Mean Daily Temp Tm C 15
Free T1 x Coeff 357 Placing Temp Tp C 20
Free Autogenous1 15 Edge R1crit 0.157
Free T2 x Coeff 240 Edge R2crit 0.000
Free Autogenous2 18 Edge R3crit 0.000
Wk Limit mm Free Drying 138 3 Day Temp Drop T1 29.7
Reinforcement Cov Ctrs Eq As Asmin Srmax 1 W1 2 W2 3 W3 Wk
End Restraint 60 150 32 5362 884 753.4 186 0.117 306 0.192 356 0.224 0.224
Edge Restraint 60 150 20 2094 884 1014 38 0.039 89 0.090 101 0.102 0.102
BS8007 60 150 20 2094 1040 954.9 73 0.070 122 0.117 0 0.000 0.117
RS = Free Strain x Restr x Creep Fact
- Full Strain Cap For End Restr
- 50% Strain Cap For Edge Restr
0.315 W3D 0.117
End R2crit 0.197 W28 0.192
End R3crit 0.112 WLT 0.224
3D (T1 & AG1) Restr R1
LT (Drying) Restr R3
0.2
Prog
Bond Factor k1
HAC-PRO 1 - 5 - 2
28D Autogenous
119.1
76.0
109.0
1.00
Formwork
Section Type - Position
EC2 DESIGN TOOL
10.1
28D fctm N/mm
1.14
LT fctm N/mm 3D fctm N/mm
THERMAL, SHRINKAGE, RESTRAINT & CREEP
28D Modular Ratio
Howes Atkinson Crowder LLP
32
Crack & Strain Diag Ratio
0.315
20
End R1crit
28D (T2 & AG2) Restr R2 0.400
0.190
0.8
20
Default
End-LT
All
Crack & Strain Diagram
Chart Shows Restraint
T2 Temp Drop C
Aggregate Type
600
LT fctm & MR taken at
LT Strain Cap taken at
20
30000 End Restraint Lr or N/A
LT Drying Period
0.8
Reinf fyk N/mm Exposed Faces
Bars
R1 End Restr Strain Ratio
Grnd
Slab
12.0
30
LT Modular Ratio
Class
Copyright 2009 HAC
End Restraint FOS
Show Cracked Strain
Microstrain Against Time
1 D 3 D 28 D 60 Yrs
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
0.00 0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00
Years - Logarithmic Scale
End Cap Edge Cap All
Autog Due to T2 Drying
All - End Limited
92
RESTR 11
Example Concrete C 30 / 37 Aggregate Default
Crack Width = Crack Spacing Srmax x Crack Inducing Strain CIS x Lr Factor
End Crack Inducing Strain CIS = (1 / Es) x ( 0.5 x kc x k x ct ) x ( ( fctm x MR) + ( fctm x 0.5 x H x 1000 / As1) )
Concrete in Tension Coefficient ct = 0.8 Mod Ratio MR = Varies - See Below
For kc & k - Ref C660 Table 3.1 If H <= 300, k = 1. If H >= 800, k =0.75 H = 600 For external restraint
Or k = 0.75 + ( 0.25 x ( 800 - H) / 500 ) k = 0.85 kc = 1.0
At 3 Days fctm = 1.73 MR = 7.11 End Restraint If Cracked CIS = 186
End Strain Capacity / ( FOS = 1 ) = 76
T1 Curing Temp Drop = 29.7 Deg Edge Strain Capacity (50% End Cap) = 38
Free Strain = 3 Day Autogenous + (T1 x ) = 15 + ( 29.7 x 12 ) = 371
K1 x Free Strain = 0.65 x 371 = 241
R1 x K1 x Basic Strain = 0.32 x 241 = 76
Strain - Capacity End 76 - 76 = 0 CIS = 186
Edge 76 - 38 = 38 CIS = 38
At 28 Days fctm = 2.9 MR = 6.1 End Restraint If Cracked CIS = 306
End Strain Capacity / ( FOS = 1 ) = 109
T2 Seasonal Temp Drop = 20.0 Deg Edge Strain Capacity (50% End Cap) = 55
Free Strain = 3 to 28 Day Autogenous + (T2 x ) = 18 + ( 20.0 x 12 ) = 258
K1 x Free Strain = 0.65 x 258 = 168
R2 x K1 x Basic Strain = 0.40 x 168 = 67
R1 x K1 x Strain1 + R2 x K1 x Strain2 = 76 + 67 = 143
Uncracked 3D End Strain + 28D End Strain = 0 + 67 = 67
If End Restraint is cracked at 3 Days, the extra strain after 3 days is compared against 28D - 3D capacity
Otherwise, compare the cumulative 28D strain against the 28D capacity. Uncracked 3D strain is added.
End Restraint cracks from 3 Days increase in width according to increased strain & strength.
28D CIS Uncracked Strain
Strain - Capacity End 67 - 33 = 34 306 or 0 = 306
Edge 143 - 55 = 89 CIS = 89
Long Term fctm = 3.4 MR = 5.7 End Restraint If Cracked CIS = 356
End Strain Capacity / ( FOS = 1 ) = 119
Edge Strain Capacity (50% End Cap) = 60
Free Strain = Drying Strain = From Table or Charts ) = 138
K1 x Free Strain = 0.65 x 138 = 90
R3 x K1 x Basic Strain = 0.19 x 90 = 17
R1K1xStrain1 + R2K1xStrain2 + R3K1xStrain3 = 76 + 67 + 17 = 160
Uncracked 28D End Strain + LT End Strain = 0 + 17 = 17
If End Restraint is only cracked at 3 Days, the extra strain after 3 days is compared against LT - 3D capacity
If End Restraint is cracked at 28 Days, the extra strain from 28 days is compared against LT- 28D capacity
Otherwise, compare the cumulative LT strain against the LT capacity. Uncracked strain is added.
End Restraint cracks from 3 Days and 28 Days increase in width according to increased strain & strength.
LT CIS Uncracked Strain
Strain - Capacity End 17 - 10 = 7 356 or 0 = 356
Edge 160 - 60 = 101 CIS = 101
Crack Spacing Srmax = 3.4 x Cov + 1.14 x (K2=1) x 0.425 x / (As1 / (1000 x 2.5 x (H - d)))
For End Restraint Reinf = 204 + 549 = 753 mm
For Edge Restraint Reinf = 204 + 810 = 1014 mm
Asmin per m width = kc k Act fctm(t) / fky Act = 0.5 x H x 1000 Zone Depth = 0.5 k H 255
For First Cracking At 3 Days 884 mm 28 Days 1477 mm Long Term 1735 mm
Lr Factor Using 28 Day MR = 1 / ( 1 + ( Srmax / Lr ) ( k x kc / ( MR x As1 / ( 0.5 x H x 1000 ) ) ) )
1 / ( 1 + ( 0.025 x 0.85 / ( 6.1 x 0.018 ) ) )
1 / ( 1 + ( 0.021 / 0.109 ) ) = 0.836
HAC-PRO 1 - 5 - 2
EC2 DESIGN TOOL
THERMAL, SHRINKAGE, RESTRAINT & CREEP Howes Atkinson Crowder LLP
Copyright 2009 HAC
93
RESTR 12
Internal Restraint Ref CIRIA C660
The restrained strain is due to the difference in temperature rise at the centre and surfaces at 3 days.
R in all cases = 0.42 Sect 4.7.4 Coefficient of Expansion = 12 x 10E-6 Values
K1 = Creep Factor = 0.65 Sect 4.9.1 3D Tensile Strain Cap = 76 From
Autogenous = N/A Sect 4.6.1 3D Tensile Strength Cap = 1.73 N/mm Main Sheet
Temperature Differential T
This is best calculated using the software provided with CIRIA C660. Appendix A2
A graph showing values for a typical GGBS blended mix design (Ref Table 4.2) is included below.
The values are similar between 50% & 70% GGBS as more binder is required with higher GGBS% to maintain strength.
Section Thickness 2200 mm Max 65.5 C Surface 21.6 C Differential 43.9 C
Restrained Strain = 0.42 x 0.65 x 43.9 x 12 = 143.8 Equ 3.7
Crack Inducing Strain = 143.8 - ( 76 x 0.5 ) = 105.8 Equ 3.5
As1 Reinforcement Table 3.1, Equs 3.12, 3.13, 3.14, Sect 3.4, Sect 4.13
Internal Restraint Dominant kc = 0.5 k = 1.0 0.2H = 0.2 x 2200 = 440 mm
As1min = 0.5 x 1.0 x 440 x 1000 x 1.73 / 500 = 762.4 mm
Note: - % As1min / Act = 0.173 This is 50% of the general value because kc is normally 1.0
Crack Spacing k1 = 1.14 Cover = 50 = 16.0 Ctrs = 250 As1 = 804.2 mm
heff = 2.5 x (Cov + /2) = 145 Aceff = mm p,eff = As1/Aceff 0.006
Srmax = 3.4 x 50 + 0.425 x 1.14 x 16.0 x 0.006 = 1568 mm
Crack Width = 1568 x 105.8 / = 0.166 mm
Also Check As1 Provided against:- 0.151 % x 1000 x d1 d1 = 2142 mm = 3226 mm
HAC-PRO 1 - 5 - 2
1000000
Howes Atkinson Crowder LLP
EC2 DESIGN TOOL
Copyright 2009 HAC
THERMAL, SHRINKAGE, RESTRAINT & CREEP
145000
Tmax, T1 and Differential
For C30 / 37, 65% GGBS
385 kg/m3 Binder
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
Thickness H mm
Deg
C
T max T1 Differential Example
Temperature Variation
Within Section
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Section Width
Deg
C
T max 0.2H
94
REST 13
Calculation of T1 Temperature Drop Using the C660 Adiabatic Program
Whereas it is possible to use the C660 T1 charts to get an accurate value according to the mix used, these values are
only appropriate when the Mean Daily Temperature (MT) = 15 deg and the Placing Temperature (PT) = 20 deg.
In order to take account of variations in MT and PT the C660 Adiabatic spreadsheet must be used.
One of the features of this HAC program is its ability to automatically calculate T1. So a considerable amount of
effort has been expended to devise a viable way of embedding key results from the C660 Adiabatic program into this
program so they can be combined to suit the mix and MT and PT values. The aim is + / - 1 degree of accuracy.
Ranges Considered
The wall thickness H can vary from 200mm to 2200mm with ply or steel formwork. Slabs use steel with H = 1.3 x Depth.
The Mean Temperature can vary from 20 deg down to 5 deg and up to 35 deg
The Placing Temperature can vary from 15 deg down to 5 deg and up to 35 deg
PFA% can vary from 0% up to 55% although the minimum addition would normally be 35%
GGBS% can vary from 0% up to 80% although the minimum addition would normally be 35%.
Values Calculated Over the Range of H
The T1 values for a Control Mix of 350 kg of CEM1 with MT = 15 deg and PT = 20 deg
The effect of varying PT between 5 deg & 35 deg in 5 deg steps.
The effect of varying MT between 5 deg & 35 deg.
The effect of a varying % of PFA for MT = 15 and PT varying between 5 deg and 35 deg.
The effect of a varying % GGBS for MT = 15 and PT varying between 5 deg and 35 deg.
The effect of a varying the kg of CEM1 for MT = 15 and PT varying between 5 deg and 35 deg.
The equivalent extra kg of CEM1 within a total of additional kg when PFA or GGBS blended mixes are used.
Observations
The results were interrogated to see how they varied. Some values diverge between H = 400mm and H = 200mm.
The results can be considered as linear and symmetrical for an MT increase or decrease about the 15 deg Control value.
Varying PT causes slightly different linear changes in T1 between the 5 degree steps from PT = 5 deg to PT = 35 deg.
Varying PT causes a linear change in T1 due to Extra CEM1 kg which lessens as H increases.
Varying PT causes a linear change in T1 due to PFA which lessens as H increases.
Varying PT causes a nearly linear change in T1 due to GGBS up to H 1000mm and increasingly polynomial thereafter.
Varying CEM1 kg causes a linearly proportional increase in T1.
Increasing PFA% causes a linearly proportional decrease in T1.
Increasing GGBS% causes a non linear decrease in T1 which is more pronounced as H increases.
Varying MT causes a linearly proportional change in T1 whatever the value of PT or other variations.
Method
The HAC program uses a sophisticated Excel Lookup procedure coupled with interpolation and extrapolation of linearly
varying data to add the variation effects to the control design values and derive a value of T1.
The GGBS% variation between PT20 and PT35 is taken as linear as this is suficiently accurate and slightly conservative.
The values are shown on composite charts which cover Ply and Steel formwork. The charts show:-
T1 variation due to Extra CEM1 kg between PT = 20 deg & 35 deg - use equiv kg value and interpolate or extrapolate.
T1 variation due to PFA% between PT = 20 deg & 35 deg - interpolate or extrapolate and factor % values as it is linear.
T1 variation due to GGBS between PT 20 deg lines and PT = 35 deg lines and % GGBS lines - interpolate or extrapolate.
T1 variation due to MT between 5 deg & 35 deg - interpolate in between MT = 5 & 15 deg and 15 & 35 deg as it is linear.
T1 variation due to PT between 5 deg & 35 deg - interpolate in between PT = 5, 10, 20, 25, 30 & 35 lines.
The T1 values for the Control parameters.
The T1 values for the Design which combines all of the above.
The charts can be used without a computer as all of the information and ranges of the varying data are shown.
The charts provide a graphical view of what is happening in the program and the program's Auto results are displayed with
an example of how the variables are taken from the chart and deducted from the control value to give a similar value.
The author has tested numerous results against the CIRIA C660 values and believes the program is accurate enough to use.
EC2 INTERACTIVE DESIGN TOOL
THERMAL, SHRINKAGE, RESTRAINT & CREEP Howes Atkinson Crowder LLP
Copyright 2009 HAC
HAC-PRO 1 - 5 - 2
95
REST 14
Variations in T1
The following charts show the variations from the Control design as described in the previous page for a wall with ply fmwk
EC2 INTERACTIVE DESIGN TOOL
THERMAL, SHRINKAGE, RESTRAINT & CREEP Howes Atkinson Crowder LLP
Copyright 2009 HAC
HAC-PRO 1 - 5 - 2
Ply - Variation in T1 Against Mean Temp (MT)
for a Selection of H
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
5 10 15 20 25 30 35
500 1000 1500 2000
Fully Linear.
Charts display at
MT = 5, 15, 25 & 35 deg
Ply - Variation in T1 Against Placing Temp (PT)
for a Selection of H with 350kg of CEM1
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
5 10 15 20 25 30 35
500 1000 1500 2000
Program calculates values at 5
deg intervals and interpolates.
Charts display at PT =
5, 10, 15, 20, 25,30 & 35 deg
Not Linear
Ply - Variation in T1 Against Extra kg of CEM1
for a Selection of H
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
-100 -50 0 50 100 150
500 1000 1500 2000
Fully Linear.
Charts display at 50
kg extra for
PT = 20 & 35 deg
Ply - Drop in T1 Against GGBS% @ PT = 20
for a Selection of H
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
500 1000 1500 2000
Charts display at
35%, 50%, 65% & 80%
for PT = 20 & 35 deg
Not Linear
Ply - Drop in T1 Against PFA% @ PT = 20
for a Selection of H
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55
500 1000 1500 2000
Nearly Linear.
Charts display at 35% & 55% for
PT = 20 & 35 deg.
Ply - Drop in T1 Against Placing Temp (PT) for
50%GGBS and a Selection of H
-15
-10
-5
0
5 10 15 20 25 30 35
500 1000 1500 2000
Typical Linear
Approximation
Charts display at
PT = 20 deg & 35 deg
96
REST 15
Calculation of T1 Temperature Drop Using the Following Charts
Manual Method
1 Select correct chart according to Ply or Steel formwork.
2 Print out the example before deleting any values. Note the values are displayed on the charts in bold colour.
3 Delete the H value in the input box. This will blank out all of the values.
4 Print out as many master sheets as you need.
5 Define H, Total kg, %GGBS or %PFA , Mean Temp (MT) & Placing Temp (PT).
Draw a vertical line against H on all 4 charts.
6 Calculate the equivalent Extra CEM1 kg and enter on sheet.
Equivalent Extra CEM1 kg = ( Total - 350 ) x ( 1 - ( 0.0075 x %PFA ) or ( 0.0025 x %GGBS ) )
7 Use Chart 1 to calculate the T1 effects of Extra CEM1 kg, %PFA or %GGBS at 20 deg PT (PT20).
Use the Equivalent CEM1 kg value and the Actual % of PFA or GGBS
Note that for %GGBS you will have to interpolate in between the 35%, 50%, 65% & 80% lines.
8 Repeat using Chart 2 for 35 deg PT (PT35).
9 Enter the above T1 variations into the spaces in the formulae to calculate the T1 according to the Design PT.
The formulae are arranged as follows.
T1 Variation = Variation at PT20 + ( ( Variation at PT35 - Variation at PT20 ) x ( Design PT - 20 ) / 15 )
10 Use Chart 3 to calculate T1 variations due to Design MT and Design PT
11 Sum up the T1 variations due to Extra CEM1 kg, %PFA or %GGBS, MT & PT to get total T1 Variation.
12 Use Chart 4 to calculate T1 for the Control parameters.
13 Design T1 value = Control T1 value + T1 Variation
Note The Excel charts are fully interactive and the blue values will adjust as the input
parameters are changed.
However, there may be occasions when it is not practical or possible to use Excel
and in these conditions it is possible to derive good results manually.
It may appear complex and slow at first but it becomes faster with practice!
EC2 INTERACTIVE DESIGN TOOL
THERMAL, SHRINKAGE, RESTRAINT & CREEP Howes Atkinson Crowder LLP
Copyright 2009 HAC
HAC-PRO 1 - 5 - 2
97
REST 16
Ply Fmwk Wall T1 Drop for Changes in Mix, Placing Temp and Mean Temp Ref C660 Adiabatic Prog
Control = 350 kg CEM1, Mean T = 15, Placing T = 20 For Slabs See Steel Formwork Chart
Design H 900 kg 370 %GGBS 60 %PFA 0 MT 30 PT 27 Auto T1 34.6 deg
Equivalent Extra CEM1 kg = ( 370 - 350 ) x ( 1 - ( 0.0075 x %PFA ) or ( 0.0025 x %GGBS ) ) = 17.0 kg
Extra kg ( 2.1 + ( ( 2.3 - 2.1 ) x ( 27 - 20 ) / 15 ) ) = 2.2
PFA % ( 0.0 + ( ( 0.0 - 0.0 ) x ( 27 - 20 ) / 15 ) ) = 0.0 Control T1 46.9 deg
GGBS% = -11.7 + ( ( -8.0 - -11.7 ) x ( 27 - 20 ) / 15 ) = -10.0 Variation -12.3 deg
MT > or < 15 deg Directly from Chart 3 = -13.1 Design T1 34.6 deg
PT > or < 20 deg Directly from Chart 3 = 8.6
Total T1 Variation = -12.3 deg
Howes Atkinson Crowder LLP
HAC-PRO 1 - 5 - 2
Copyright 2009 HAC
EC2 INTERACTIVE DESIGN TOOL
THERMAL, SHRINKAGE, RESTRAINT & CREEP
4 - Ply - Variation in Wall T1 Against Control and
H Due to Extra CEM1, %PFA or %GGBS, PT & MT
46.9
34.6
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200
Design Control
1 - Ply - Variation in Wall T1 Against Control and
H @PT20 Due to GGBS or PFA and + 50KgCEM1
2.1
-11.7
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200
%GGBS % PFA + 50KgCEM1
80%
65%
50%
35%
+50Kg
35%PFA
55%PFA
2 - Ply - Variation in Wall T1 Against Control and
H @PT35 Due to GGBS or PFA and +50kgCEM1
2.3
-8.0
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200
%GGBS % PFA + 50kgCEM1
80%
65%
50%
35%
+50Kg
35%PFA
55%PFA
3 - Ply - Variation in Wall T1 Against Control and
H Due to PT and MT
8.6
-13.1
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200
PT = 5 - 35 deg MT = 5 - 35 deg
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
15
35
5
25
98
REST 17
Steel Fmwk T1 Drop for Changes in Mix, Placing Temp and Mean Temp Ref C660 Adiabatic Prog
Control = 350 kg CEM1, Mean T = 15, Placing T = 20 For Slabs H = Depth x 1.3
Design H 900 kg 400 %GGBS 0 %PFA 40 MT 30 PT 27 Auto T1 28.7 deg
Equivalent Extra CEM1 kg = ( 400 - 350 ) x ( 1 - ( 0.0075 x %PFA ) or ( 0.0025 x %GGBS ) ) = 35.0 kg
Extra kg ( 3.9 + ( ( 4.6 - 3.9 ) x ( 27 - 20 ) / 15 ) ) = 4.2
PFA % ( -13.7 + ( ( -16.1 - -13.7 ) x ( 27 - 20 ) / 15 ) ) = -14.8 Control T1 42.4 deg
GGBS% = 0.0 + ( ( 0.0 - 0.0 ) x ( 27 - 20 ) / 15 ) = 0.0 Variation -13.7 deg
MT > or < 15 deg Directly from Chart 3 = -12.4 Design T1 28.7 deg
PT > or < 20 deg Directly from Chart 3 = 9.3
Total T1 Variation = -13.7 deg
Howes Atkinson Crowder LLP
Copyright 2009 HAC
EC2 INTERACTIVE DESIGN TOOL
THERMAL, SHRINKAGE, RESTRAINT & CREEP
HAC-PRO 1 - 5 - 2
2 - Steel - Variation in Wall T1Against Control and
H @PT35 Due to GGBS or PFA and +50kgCEM1
4.6
-16.1
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200
+ 50kg CEM1 %PFA %GGBS
+50Kg
35%
50%
65%
80%
35%PFA
55%PFA
3 - Steel - Variation in Wall T1 Against Control and
H Due to PT and MT
9.3
-12.4
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200
PT = 5 - 35 deg MT = 5 - 35 deg
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
15
35
5
25
4 - Steel - Variation in Wall T1 Against Control and
H Due to Extra CEM1, %PFA or %GGBS, PT & MT
42.4
28.7
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200
Design Control
1 - Steel - Variation in Wall T1Against Control and
H @PT20 Due to GGBS or PFA and +50kgCEM1
3.9
-13.7
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200
+ 50kg CEM1 %PFA %GGBS
+50Kg
35%
50%
65%
80%
35%PFA
55%PFA
99
RC Det 1
Reinforcement Layout and Quantities
PANEL 1 Walls W1 & W2
Key Data Reinforcement Parameters and Data
HOR Ctrs 150 O/A Lap = Dia x 50 Horiz Cov 40
H W3 600 Stag = Diax 65 H W4 600
Cov W3 40 End Bars = U Cov W4 40
Near Gap 1050 Max Bar L 9000 Near Gap 1050
Far Gap 700 Min Gap = 40 Far Gap 700
Vertical Top U Bar Closers Dia Ctrs 300
VERT Ctrs 150 O/A Lap = Dia x 50 Vert Cov 60
H Bot 600 Stag = Diax 65 H Top 0
Cov Bot 40 Starter Bars L Cov Top 50
Near Gap 600 Max Bar L 5000 Near gap 2000
Far Gap 150 Kicker = 150 Far Gap 1800
Top
Horiz ctrs 150 Hor Cov 40 Vert Cov 60
Vert ctrs 150 Horiz Ends are U Bars
Closer ctrs 300 Starters are L Bars
W3 W4
Near Rate kg/m 140.4
Far Total
Bot H = 600 mm
COSTING DATA
Reinf Dia 10 12 16 20 25 32 40
0.0 0.2 2.3 3.5 2.5 2.3 0.0
10.8 Tonne @ 800 / T = Steel 60 / m Ply 40 / m
77 m @ 125 / m = Formwork Ply
256 m @ 40 / m = Rate kg/m 140.4 Total
EC2 DESIGN TOOL
REINFORCEMENT LAYOUT & QUANTITIES
25 20 20
The method also allows the cost of an element to be estimated. The current rates for the reinforcement, concrete
and formwork are entered. The programcalculates the tonnage of reinforcement allowing for laps based on the
specified maximumbar lengths. This is a guide only, as reinforcement and concrete rates depend on the total
project quantities and formwork rates depend on the method and amount of re-use.
W3 W4 Span
Howes Atkinson Crowder LLP
Near Face
Copyright 2009 HAC
HAC-PRO 1 - 5 - 2
The following method allows the design reinforcement requirements to be displayed in a manner that is suitable
for briefing for detailing. It also demonstrates the concepts of staggered and alternate bars. It is good practice to
stagger bars to even out the bond transfer. The use of alternate diameters allows more economy and the
diagramshows how the lap length is always based on the smaller bar dia. The sequence should be large dia
followed by small dia to avoid too much bar size variation at laps.
20 25 Dia
16000
16
25 Far Face Dia 20 16
32 Near Face Dia
25 20
25 32
Gap Denotes Bar Offset Distance From Face or Top
12
Top
20
16
16
Span
Far Face
Tonne
Reinft Wt
WALL
Dia
Conc Vol
Fmk Area
8000
12
10,240
16
Bot
20 16 25 16
W1
28,464
28,464
8,624
9,600
20
1050
2350
700
2000
25
20 20
16
25
20
20
16
25
20
25
20
2090
1050
1740
700
1
5
0
1
4
5
0
0
6
0
02
2
2
5
2
5
2
0
2
0
1
6
0
3
2
2
5
3
2
1
6
1
61
2
1
6
1
6
1
2
2
5
8
0
1
8
0
0
2
7
8
0
2
0
0
0
100
RC Det 2
Reinforcement Layout and Quantities Cont.
Cost of Structural Elements
Generally, there will be 2 similar long panels, 2 similar short panels, a base slab and possibly a roof slab and columns.
Wall 1
Wall 2
Wall 3
Wall 4
Base Slab
Columns N/A
Roof Slab N/A
PANEL 2 Walls W3 & W4
Key Data Reinforcement Parameters and Data
HOR Ctrs 150 O/A Lap = Dia x 50 Horiz Cov 40
H W3 600 Stag = Diax 65 H W4 600
Cov W3 40 End Bars = U Cov W4 40
Near Gap 500 Max Bar L 9000 Near Gap 500
Far Gap 300 Min Gap = 40 Far Gap 300
Vertical Top U Bar Closers Dia Ctrs 300
VERT Ctrs 150 O/A Lap = Dia x 50 Vert Cov 60
H Bot 600 Stag = Diax 65 H Top 0
Cov Bot 40 Starter Bars L Cov Top 50
Near Gap 150 Max Bar L 5000 Near gap 2000
Far Gap 150 Kicker = 150 Far Gap 1800
Top
Horiz ctrs 150 Hor Cov 40 Vert Cov 60
Vert ctrs 150 Horiz Ends are U Bars
Closer ctrs 300 Starters are L Bars
W3 W4
Near Rate kg/m 120.1
Far Total
Bot H = 600 mm
COSTING DATA
Reinf Dia 10 12 16 20 25 32 40
0.1 0.3 1.7 2.6 2.2 0.0 0.0
6.9 Tonne @ 800 / T = Steel 60 / m Ply 40 / m
58 m @ 125 / m = Formwork Ply
192 m @ 40 / m = Rate kg/m 120.1 Total Fmk Area
Conc Vol
Reinft Wt
Near Face
Tonne
7,200
WALL
0
0
5,536
14,400
0
16
25
Reinf
8,624
8,624
EC2 DESIGN TOOL
Total
9,600
Fmwk
10,240
Conc
REINFORCEMENT LAYOUT & QUANTITIES
Copyright 2009 HAC
HAC-PRO 1 - 5 - 2
Howes Atkinson Crowder LLP
28,464
0
7,680
10,240
1,344 33,240
28,464
20,416 7,680
131,000
5,536
0 0
20,416
0
45,816 37,184
25
7,200
9,600
17,496
48,000
W4
20
Span W3 12000
0
20
20
Span
16 20
16 16 12 Near Face
Far Face
Far Face
16
Dia
25 20 20
16
W3
Dia
25
20 25
25 Dia
Bot
Dia 20 25 16 12 12
20,416
8000
Gap Denotes Bar Offset Distance From Face or Top
Top
5,536
20,416
7,200
7,680
666.6666667
2400
400
2133.333333
25
20 20
16
25
20
20
16
25
20
25
20
2053.333333
666.6666667
1786.666667
400
1
5
0
1
1
9
0
0
1
5
0
1
4
5
0
2
5
1
6
2
0
1
2
0
2
5
2
0
2
51
6
1
6
1
2
1
6
1
6
1
2
2
5
8
0
1
8
0
0
2
7
8
0
2
0
0
0
101
RC Det 3
Reinforcement Layout and Quantities Cont.
BASE SLAB
Extra Bars Over Supports Dia 1 Dia 2 Ctrs L Width Tonne
X - X Dir 25 25 150 4000 1200 0.138
Y - Y Dir 25 25 150 4000 1200 0.138 0.276 T
Locations 6 Total Wt 1.654 T
Key Data Reinforcement Parameters and Data
X - X Ctrs 150 O/A Lap = Dia x 50 X - X Cov 60
H W3 600 Stag = Diax 65 H W4 600
Cov W3 40 End Bars = U Cov W4 40
Top Gap 300 Max Bar L 9000 Top Gap 300
Bot Gap 300 Min Gap = 40 Bot Gap 300
Chairs Dia and Centres Each Way Ctrs 1000
Y - Y Ctrs 150 O/A Lap = Dia x 50 Y - Y Cov 40
H W2 600 Stag = Diax 65 H W1 600
Cov W2 40 End Bars = L Cov W1 40
Top Gap 300 Max Bar L 5000 Top Gap 300
Bot Gap 300 Min Gap = 150 Bot Gap 300
W1 Y
X - X ctrs 150 X - X Cov 60 Y - Y Cov 40
Y - Y ctrs 150 X -X Ends are U Bars
Y - Y ends are L Bars
W3 W4
X X
T Rate kg/m 189.8
B Total
W2 Y H = 600 mm
COSTING DATA
Reinf Dia 10 12 16 20 25 32 40 Chairs & Supp
0.0 0.0 0.0 10.2 5.7 3.8 0.0 2.2
21.9 Tonne @ 800 / T = Steel 60 / m Ply 40 / m
115 m @ 125 / m = Formwork Grnd & Ply Edges
34 m @ 40 / m = Rate kg/m 189.8 Total
Top Dia 25
W3
25
Span
EC2 DESIGN TOOL
HAC-PRO 1 - 5 - 2
W4 16000
The bottom base slab reinforcement for a flat slab is often practically taken as the same across the slab. The top
reinforcement must resist the wall moment and tension at the edges and peak moments over the piles or columns. A
common way of detailing the support reinforcement is to provide a blanket top mat that will satisfy thermal and general
support moments with extra bars bundled over the support over a width =pile spacing / 4.
Dia 25 20
20 20 25
25 20 25
Span W2
20
20
Fmk Area
Tonne
SLAB
Bottom
Conc Vol
Reinft Wt
33,240
Top Dia
Dia
20
32
20 25
20 32
Bottom
20
32
17,496
20 20
Base Slab
32
25
33,240
W1
1,344
14,400
Gap Denotes Bar Offset Distance From Face
12000
25
Copyright 2009 HAC
Howes Atkinson Crowder LLP REINFORCEMENT LAYOUT & QUANTITIES
300
1600
300
1925
25
20 25
20
25
25
20
20
25
25
25
20
1600
300
1600
300
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
2
0
0
1
0
6
7
2
0
0
1
0
6
7
2
5
2
0
2
0
2
0
3
2
2
0
3
2
2
0
2
5
2
0
3
23
2
1
0
6
7
2
0
0
1
0
6
7
2
0
0
102
RC Det 4
Reinforcement Layout and Quantities Cont.
ROOF SLAB
Extra Bars Over Supports Dia 1 Dia 2 Ctrs L Width Tonne
X - X Dir 16 16 150 4000 1200 0.056
Y - Y Dir 16 16 150 4000 1200 0.056 0.113 T
Locations 6 Total Wt 0.677 T
Columns Dia 1 Nr Link Ctrs Ht H Reinf Conc Fmk
T m m
Data 25 8 10 300 8000 500 0.402 2.0 16
Locations 6 Totals 2.414 12 96
Key Data Reinforcement Parameters and Data
X - X Ctrs 150 O/A Lap = Dia x 50 X - X Cov 60
H W3 600 Stag = Diax 65 H W4 600
Cov W3 40 End Bars = U Cov W4 40
Top Gap 300 Max Bar L 9000 Top Gap 300
Bot Gap 300 Min Gap = 40 Bot Gap 300
Chairs Dia and Centres Each Way Ctrs 1000
Y - Y Ctrs 150 O/A Lap = Dia x 50 Y - Y Cov 40
H W2 600 Stag = Diax 65 H W1 600
Cov W2 40 End Bars = L Cov W1 40
Top Gap 300 Max Bar L 5000 Top Gap 300
Bot Gap 300 Min Gap = 150 Bot Gap 300
W1 Y
X - X ctrs 150 X - X Cov 60 Y - Y Cov 40
Y - Y ctrs 150 X -X Ends are U Bars
Y - Y ends are L Bars
W3 W4
X X
T Rate kg/m 144.9
B Total
W2 Y H = 400 mm
COSTING DATA
Reinf Dia 10 12 16 20 25 32 40 Chairs & Supp
0.3 1.7 3.2 4.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2
11.1 Tonne @ 800 / T = Steel 60 / m Ply 40 / m
77 m @ 125 / m = Formwork Ply
192 m @ 40 / m = Rate kg/m 144.9 Total
20
W2
20
W3
16 12
EC2 DESIGN TOOL
16
20
Bottom
12
12 20
16
Dia
20
16
Span
20 20 20
W1
20
12 12
26,184 7,680
9,600
8,904
Copyright 2009 HAC
16000
20 20
W4
Howes Atkinson Crowder LLP REINFORCEMENT LAYOUT & QUANTITIES
Span
16
Fmk Area
Conc Vol
Reinft Wt
HAC-PRO 1 - 5 - 2
16 12 16 Bottom
Top
SLAB
Tonne
12000
12
Dia
Dia
Dia Top
Roof Slab
Gap Denotes Bar Offset Distance From Face
26,184
300
1340
300
1340
20
16 20
12
16
16
12
12
20
20
16
12
1080
300
1080
300
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
2
0
0
8
9
3
2
0
0
1
0
6
7
1
6
1
6
1
2
1
2
2
0
2
0
2
0
2
0
1
61
2
2
02
0
7
2
02
0
0
1
0
6
7
2
0
0
103
MC 1
Typical BS & EC2 0.2mm Crack Width Service Moment Capacity Curves
EC2 gives a higher relative capacity as the moment increases and the section depth reduces and the cover increases
B 1000 Cov 40 ctrs 150 fcu 40 fck 32 CR 1.5
H H
Dia 300 12 16 20 25 32 40 400 12 16 20 25 32 40
M kNm BS 48 68 92 128 183 249 77 105 141 195 284 398
M kNm EC2 33 67 100 154 254 400 38 84 137 208 343 545
Kg / m3 20 35 54 85 139 218 15 26 41 64 105 163
H H
Dia 500 12 16 20 25 32 40 600 16 16 20 25 32 40
M kNm BS 113 147 193 265 385 548 195 195 251 339 491 700
M kNm EC2 48 97 170 259 423 677 120 120 205 313 499 797
Kg / m3 12 21 33 51 84 131 17 17 27 43 70 109
Howes Atkinson Crowder LLP
Copyright 2009 HAC
EC2 DESIGN TOOL
SERVICE MOMENT CAPACITY COMPARISON
HAC-PRO 1 - 5 - 2
BS & EC2 0.2mm Crack Ms kNm against
Dia @ 150 ctrs B = 1000mm Cover = 40mm
H= 400mm
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40
BS EC2 Kg/m3
BS & EC2 0.2mm Crack Ms kNm against
Dia @ 150 ctrs B = 1000mm Cover = 40mm
H= 300mm
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40
BS EC2 Kg/m3
BS & EC2 0.2mm Crack Ms kNm against
Dia @ 150 ctrs B = 1000mm Cover = 40mm
H= 600mm
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40
BS EC2 Kg/m3
BS & EC2 0.2mm Crack Ms kNm against
Dia @ 150 ctrs B = 1000mm Cover = 40mm
H= 500mm
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40
BS EC2 Kg/m3
104
MC 2
Typical BS & EC2 0.2mm Crack Width Service Moment Capacity Curves
EC2 gives a higher relative capacity as the moment increases and the section depth reduces and the cover increases
B 1000 Cov 60 ctrs 150 fcu 40 fck 32 CR 1.5
H H
Dia 300 12 16 20 25 32 40 400 12 16 20 25 32 40
M kNm BS 37 49 64 85 114 149 65 83 107 142 199 269
M kNm EC2 26 50 77 113 178 272 32 66 107 163 255 390
Kg / m3 20 35 54 85 139 218 15 26 41 64 105 163
H H
Dia 500 12 16 20 25 32 40 600 16 16 20 25 32 40
M kNm BS 102 121 154 203 286 393 166 166 207 270 379 524
M kNm EC2 35 75 133 212 330 506 84 84 150 255 403 616
Kg / m3 12 21 33 51 84 131 17 17 27 43 70 109
HAC-PRO 1 - 5 - 2
Howes Atkinson Crowder LLP
Copyright 2009 HAC
SERVICE MOMENT CAPACITY COMPARISON
EC2 DESIGN TOOL
BS & EC2 0.2mm Crack Ms kNm against
Dia @ 150 ctrs B = 1000mm Cover = 60mm
H= 400mm
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40
BS EC2 Kg/m3
BS & EC2 0.2mm Crack Ms kNm against
Dia @ 150 ctrs B = 1000mm Cover = 60mm
H= 300mm
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40
BS EC2 Kg/m3
BS & EC2 0.2mm Crack Ms kNm against
Dia @ 150 ctrs B = 1000mm Cover = 60mm
H= 600mm
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40
BS EC2 Kg/m3
BS & EC2 0.2mm Crack Ms kNm against
Dia @ 150 ctrs B = 1000mm Cover = 60mm
H= 500mm
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40
BS EC2 Kg/m3
105
HAC-PRO 1 - 5 - 2 FAT 1
Fatigue
Concrete demonstrates a loss of strength which depends on the number of Cycles N and the ratio between the maximum
and minimum values of the cyclical stress range.
N is defined in multiples of a million and the loss of strength for a given Min / Max stress ratio R relates linearly to Log N.
This is presented in Wohler diagrams as below where Log 1 million = 6 and log 10 million is 7 and so on.
Ref. Fatigue of Normal Weight Concrete and Lightweight Concrete by EuroLightCon
http://www.sintef.no/static/bm/projects/eurolightcon/be3942r34.pdf
By comparing the max / fc,c values at Log N =6 against the EC2 k1 value of 0.85 we can derive k1 for log N = 8 & 7
k1 at Log N = 8 = x / =
k1 at Log N = 7 = x / =
This is compared with a 2nd reference.
Ref. Fracture and fatigue behaviour of high strength
limestone concrete as compared to gravel concrete
by Hordijl, Wolsink, de Vries
TNO Building & Research
By Extrapolating line
k1 at Log N = 7
= x / =
Therefore a consistent value of k1 at N = 10 million is derived
Copyright 2009 HAC
0.85 0.535 0.6
0.76
0.67
0.85
EC2 DESIGN TOOL
FATIGUE
0.42
Howes Atkinson Crowder LLP
0.42
0.76
0.85 0.33
0.375
106
HAC-PRO 1 - 5 - 2 FAT 2
Fatigue
The following sheets demonstrate the process used in the program Ref EC2 part 1-1 Section 6.8
& Ref 20 by Hendy and Smith
Concrete in Compression
Normal cc = However as K1 is deemed to include for Long Term Effects cc,fat =
Grade C 35 / 45 N Using the insitu strength at loading and setting (to) at 28 days
fcd - non fatigue = cc fck / m = x / = N/mm2
K1 at N = Million Cycles = National Annex Varies logarithmically to a
= See Fat 1 Fatigue Limit at 100 Million
Design Value = Derived from above as per Whler diagrams
cc (to) = exp ( s ( 1 - (28 / to) ^ 0.5 ) ) For Class N Cement s =
= Age at time of loading (to) = Days
Strength Factor = 1 - ( fck / 250 ) = 1 - ( / ) =
fcd, fat = k1 cc (to) (cc,fat / cc) (1 - (fck / 250) fcd = x = N/mm2
Verification Methods
Ratio For Requ = / =
Equ 6.72 Ecd, max, equ + ( Log N / 6 ) x ( ( 1 - Requ ) ^ 0.5 ) < =
Ecd, max, equ = cd max, equ / fcd,fat Where Log N / 6 x =
Requ = ( cd min, equ / fcd,fat ) / ( cd, max / fcd,fat ) = cd min / cd, max
Ecd, max, equ = 1 - x ( ( 1 - Requ ) ^ )
Ecd, max, equ = 1 - x ( ( 1 - ) ^ ) =
cd max, equ = fcd,fat = x = N/mm2
cd max, equ / fcd = / = Fatigue Factor
fck, fat = x = 14 N/mm2 fcu, fat = x = 18 N/mm2
Equ 6.77 c, max / fcd,fat < = 1 + x ( c, min / fcd, fat ) < =
c, max < = 0.5 fcd, fat + ( x c, min ) < = 0.9 fcd, fat
c, max < = 0.5 fcd,fat + x R,equ x c,max < = 0.9 fcd, fat
c, max < = fcd,fat x 0.5 / ( 1 - ( 0.45 x R,equ ) ) < = 0.9 fcd, fat
c, max < = x N/mm2
cd max, equ / fcd = / = Fatigue Factor
fck, fat = x = 14 N/mm2 fcu, fat = x = 18 N/mm2
Note Equ 6.72 factor for LogN > 6 taken from EC2 part 2: Concrete Bridges. For LogN =7, value matches equ 6.77
Equ 6.77 does not include an N term and from above it appears it is based on 10 million cycles.
0.4085
0.4093 45
8.1026
19.833
0.45
0.4085
0.4093
0.4085 45
0.9
8.1026
19.833
0.43
35
8.1182
0.5323
35
8.1182 0.5323
1
19.833
1
1.5
0.1309
0.7689
15.251
250 35
0.85
100
10
382
0.76
0.85
0.67
0.5017
0.5017
1
1
FATIGUE
EC2 DESIGN TOOL
0.5017
0.5
0.5 0.5323
0.25
19.833
Howes Atkinson Crowder LLP
Copyright 2009 HAC
0.45
0.45
15.251 0.5313
35
0.43
0.85
50 0.1309
28
0.86
15.251
0.4093
107
HAC-PRO 1 - 5 - 2 FAT 3
Concrete in Shear
The EC2 shear design approach differs from BS8110 in that it utilises a strut and tie system when links are required.
Therefore, for EC2 designs utilising a compressive strut, the compression values from Equ 6.7.7 may be used but with the
additional strength reduction factor v for concrete cracked in shear as per 6.2 (6).
Where v = x ( 1 - ( fck / ) ) =
For members not requiring shear reinforcement, the EC2 method is similar to the BS8110 method, see example below.
Equ 6.78 VED,max / VRd,c < = + x ( VED,min / VRd,c ) < =
EC2 VRd,c = ( CRd,c k ( 100 1 fck ) ^ ( 0.333 ) ) bw d / kN Ignoring
Axial Load
& VRd,c min = ( vmin ) bw d / kN
CRd,c = / m = / =
vmin = x k ^ ( 3/ 2) x fck ^ (1/ 2) Appliies where Asl is very low or zero
For d = mm bw = mm Asl = mm2
k = Depth Factor = 1 + ( ( 200 / d ) ^ 0.5 ) ) <= =
100 1 = 100 x As l / ( bw d ) = x / ( x ) =
VRd,c = ( x x ( x ) ^ ) x x / = kN
VRd,c min = x ( ^ ) x ( 35 ^ ) x x / = kN
BS8110 Vc = ( (0.79 / 1.25 ) ( 400 / d ) ^ 0.25) ( ( 100 1 fcu / 25 ) ^ 0.333 ) bw d / 1000 kN
= ( x x ( x ) ^ ) x x / = kN
BS gives an equivalent capacity to EC2 fcu max = 40 N /mm2
Both methods include 1 and fck or fcu terms ^ 0.333
Where Vequ = VED, min / VED, max = / = > = 0
VED,max < = VRd,c x 0.5 + ( x VED,min ) < = 0.9 VRd,c
VED,max < = VRd,c x 0.5 + ( x V,equ x VED,max ) < = 0.9 VRd,c
VED,max < = VRd,c x 0.5 / ( 1 - ( 0.45 x V,equ ) ) < = 0.9 VRd,c
VED,max < = VRd,c x 0.5 / ( 1 - ( x ) ) = VRd,c x
Shear Fatigue Factor = VRd,c = kN Vc = kN
The EC2 Design Tool spreadsheet uses fck,fat and fcu,fat values throughout. So, in order to give the correct values for
shear the spreadsheet program needs to multiply the concrete shear capacity components by the following factors
EC2 VRd,c Shear Fatigue Factor x ( Fck / Fck, fat ) ^ 0.333 =
VRd,c min Shear Fatigue Factor x ( Fck / Fck, fat ) ^ 0.5 =
BS Vc Shear Fatigue Factor x ( Fcu / Fcu, fat ) ^ 0.333 =
0.6059
288.52
0.18 0.18 1.5
1000
1000
1.6086 2
228.12
0.3333
1000
313.36
1000
1000
0.5
3272 1000
35 1000 540
100
1000
0.12
3272
540
540
0.035
540
0.632 0.9277 0.6059
0.12
0.7155
1.6086 0.6059
0.035 1.6086 1.5
0.5313
1.6
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.5
0.3333
0.8304
0.688
166.48
0.1309 0.5313
153.29
1000
382 50 0.1309
540
0.516 0.6 250
0.9
1000
0.45
Copyright 2009 HAC
Howes Atkinson Crowder LLP
EC2 DESIGN TOOL
FATIGUE
108
HAC-PRO 1 - 5 - 2 FAT 4
Reinforcement
The damage caused by a single stress amplitude is determined from the S - N curves in EC2 Fig 6.30 as below
Values are based on yield and do not include s,fat, which must be applied at the end of the process.
3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2
0 1 2 4 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
2 2 0 3
0 7 7 4 -2
Straight Bars N* = 1 Million Cycles & Rsk = N/mm2
Bent - mandrel = 7 N* = 1 Million Cycles & Rsk = x = N/mm2
Below N*, the graph relates to the slope where Log Rsk = k1 Log N = 5 Log N
Beyond N*, the graph relates to the slope where Log Rsk = k2 Log N = 9 Log N
At Log ( Million ) = Log ( Rsk ) =
At Log ( Million ) = Log ( Rsk ) = - / 9 =
10 ^ = N/mm2 Reinf yield stress fyk = N/mm2
The fyd value of resisting stress range of the cyclical loading = / m = 1.15 = N/mm2
R = Min Action / Max Action = / =
Max fyd value = / s,fat = 1.15 = N/mm2 R at Max Stress =
Straight Bars Max Stress = / ( 1 - R ) = N/mm2 Factor =
Bent Bars Max Stress = x = N/mm2 Factor =
0 45 90 ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##
0 1 1 1 0 -1 -1 -1 -0 1 1 1 0 -1 -1 -1 -0 1 1 1
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
R = 0 71 ## ## ## 71 32 16 32 71 ## ## ## 71 32 16 32 71 ## ## ##
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
-50 -50 -50 -50 -50 -50 -50 -50 -50 -50 -50 -50 -50 -50 -50 -50 -50 -50 -50 -50 -50
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13
## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##
0.154
0.2895
2.100
0.7484
382
86.5 0.532 162.5
125.88 67
162.5
2.2109
2.2109
500
434.78
126
50 0.1309
0.532
1
10
2.0997423
Copyright 2009 HAC
EC2 DESIGN TOOL
FATIGUE Howes Atkinson Crowder LLP
109.41
6
7
125.82
500
125.82 109.41
1
S - N Curve
0
1
2
3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Log Number of Cycles (N)
Log
Resisting
Stress
Range
K1 Slope = 5
K2 Slope = 9
Log N* = 6
(Rsk)
Cyclical Loading
126
16
126
16
126
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Time
Maximum
Stress
Utilisation
N/mm2