This document is a syllabus for an advanced game theory course. It provides an overview of the course, including logistics, assignments, grading, and a detailed outline of topics to be covered over the quarter such as solution concepts, repeated games, reputation, learning in games, and behavioral game theory.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
458 views5 pages
Syllabus Game Theory Stanford
This document is a syllabus for an advanced game theory course. It provides an overview of the course, including logistics, assignments, grading, and a detailed outline of topics to be covered over the quarter such as solution concepts, repeated games, reputation, learning in games, and behavioral game theory.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5
Economics 286 Jonathan Levin
Spring 2006 Stanford University
Game Theory Syllabus Overview. This is an advanced course in game theory, intended for students who are interested in pursuing micro theory research or who want a good theory back- ground to do applied work. The course will cover a combination of standard results and current research topics. The prerequisite is familiarity with the basic ideas of game theory Nash equilibrium, subgame perfection, incomplete information as introduced in Economics 203. Please talk to me if you havent taken Economics 203 or 160 or another equivalent. Logistics. The class meets MW 9:0010:50 in Econ 218. I plan to have oce hours M 3:155 in my Economics Department oce (Landau 240). You can also contact me to make an appointment for some other time. My email address is [email protected]. Ill post assignments, lecture notes, etc. on the Stanford Coursework class web page. Assignments and Grading. There will be four problem sets and a nal exam. Grades are based on a weighted average of assignments (40%) and the exam (60%). The assignments will be spaced evenly over the quarter. I encourage you to collabo- rate so long as solutions are written up individually. Ill post solutions on the course web page. The grader for the class is Xiaochen Fan ([email protected]) please dont harass her unnecessarily. The exam will have a 24 hour take-home format, with a several day window for taking it. Reading. I will hand out notes for all the lectures. The lectures notes will have detailed references; virtually all the papers can be downloaded easily. There are also several books you may nd useful. Fudenberg, D. and J. Tirole, Game Theory, MIT Press, 1992. Osborne, M. and A. Rubinstein, A Course in Game Theory, MIT Press, 1994. Mailath, G. and L. Samuelson, Repeated Games and Reputations: Long-Run Rela- tionships, Oxford, 2006. The rst two are general texts and have substantial overlap. Both are excellent, but close to fteen years old. The Mailath-Samuelson book is not-yet released; you can nd selected chapters on George Mailaths webpage at Penn. 1 Outline of Topics 1. Solution Concepts (2 lectures) FT, chapter 2; OR, chapters 24. Bernheim, D. (1984) Rationalizable Strategic Behavior, Econometrica, 52, 1007-1028. Pearce. D. (1984) Rationalizable Strategic Behavior and the Problem of Perfection, Econometrica, 52, 1029-1050. Aumann, R. (1987) Correlated Equilibrium as an Extension of Bayesian Rationality, Econometrica, 55, 1-18. Brandenburger, A. and E. Dekel (1987): Rationalizability and Correlated Equilibria, Econometrica, 55, 13911402. Gul, F. (1998) A Comment on Aumanns Bayesian View, Econometrica, 66. Fudenberg, D. and D. Levine (1993) Self-Conrming Equilibrium, Econo- metrica, 61, 523- 546. Dekel, E., D. Fudenberg and D. Levine (2004) Learning to Play Bayesian Games, Games and Econ. Behav., 46, 282-303. 2. Common Knowledge and Common Priors (2 lectures) OR, chapter 5. Samuelson, L. (2004) Modeling Knowledge in Economic Analysis, J. Econ. Lit., 62, 367-403. Aumann, R. and A. Brandenburger (1995) Epistemic Conditions for Nash Equilibrium, Econometrica, 63, 1161-1180. Aumann, R. (1976) Agreeing to Disagree, Ann. of Stat. Milgrom, P. and N. Stokey (1982) Information, Trade and Common Knowl- edge, J. Econ. Theory, 26, 177-227. Harrison, M. and D. Kreps (1978): Speculative Investor Behavior in a Stock Market with Heterogeneous Expectations, Quart. J. Econ, 92, 323-336. 3. Supermodular Games and Global Games (2 lectures) Milgrom, P. and J. Roberts (1990) Rationalizability and Learning in Games with Strategic Complementarities, Econometrica, 58, 1255-1277. Carlsson, H. and E. van Damme (1993) Global Games and Equilibrium Selection, Econometrica, 61, 989-1018. 2 Morris, S. and H. Shin (1998) Unique Equilibrium in a Model of Self- Fullling Attacks, Amer. Econ. Rev., 89, 587597. Morris, S. and H. Shin (2002) The Social Value of Public Information, Amer. Econ. Rev., 92, 1521-1534. Morris, S. and H. Shin (2003) Global Games: Theory and Applications, in Advances in Economics and Econometrics, Cambridge University Press. Abreu, D. and M. Brunnermeier (2003) Bubbles and Crashes, Economet- rica, 71, 173204. 4. Repeated Games (4 lectures) Fudenberg and Tirole, chapter 5. Osborne and Rubinstein, chapter 8. Abreu, D. On the Theory of Innitely Repeated Games with Discounting, Econometrica. Abreu, D. D. Pearce and E. Stacchetti (1990) Toward a Theory of Dis- counted Repeated Games with Imperfect Monitoring, Econometrica, 60, 1041-1063. Fudenberg, D. and E. Maskin (1986) The Folk Theorem for Repeated Games with Discounting or with Incomplete Information, Econometrica. Fudenberg, D. D. Levine and E. Maskin (1994) The Folk Theorem with Imperfect Public Information, Econometrica, 64, 997-1039. Levin, J. (2003) Relational Incentive Contracts, Amer. Econ. Rev. Sekiguchi, T. (1997) Eciency in Repeated Prisoners Dilemma with Private Monitoring, J. Econ. Theory, 76, 345361. Ely, J. and J. Valimaki (2002) A Robust Folk Theorem for the Prisoners Dilemma, J. Econ. Theory. Mailath, G. and S. Morris (2002) Repeated Games with Almost-Public Mon- itoring, J. Econ. Theory. Matsushima, H. (2004) Repeated Games with Private Monitoring: Two Players, Econometrica. Ely, J., J. Horner, and W. Olszewski (2005) Belief-free Equilibria in Re- peated Games, Econometrica. Horner, J. and W. Olszewski (2006) The Folk Theorem for Games with Private Almost-Perfect Monitoring, Econometrica. 5. Reputation (2-3 lectures) Kreps, D. and R. Wilson (1982) Reputation and Imperfect Information, J. Econ. Theory, 27, 253-179. 3 Milgrom, P. and J. Roberts (1982) Predation, Reputation, and Entry De- terrence, J. Econ. Theory, 27, 280-312. Fudenberg, D. and D. Levine (1989) Reputation and Equilibrium Selection in Ganes with a Patient Player, Econometrica, 57, 759-778. Schmidt, K. (1993) Reputation and Equilibrium Characterization in Re- peated Games with Conicting Interests, Econometrica, 61, 325-351. Tiroloe, J. (1996) A Theory of Collective Reputations, Rev. Econ. Studies. Ely, J. and J. Valimaki (2002) Bad Reputation, Quarterly J. Econ. Tadelis, S. (2003) The Market for Reputations as an Incentive Mechanism, J. Pol. Econ. Mailath, G. and L. Samuelson (2001) Who Wants a Good Reputation, Rev. Econ. Studies. Abreu, D. and F. Gul (2001) Bargaining and Reputation, Econometrica. Cripps, M., G. Mailath and L. Samuelson (2004) Imperfect Monitoring and Impermanent Reputations, Econometrica. Abreu, D. and D. Pearce (2005) Reputational Wars of Attrition with Com- plex Bargaining Postures, Working Paper. 6. Learning in Games (2 lectures) Fudenberg, D. and D. Levine, Theory of Learning in Games, MIT Press, 1998. Kalai, E. and E. Lehrer (1993) Rational Learning Leads to Nash Equilib- rium, Econometrica, 61, 10191045. Nachbar, J. (1997) Prediction, Optimization, and Learning in Repeated Games, Econometrica, 65, 275-309. Erev, I. and A. Roth (1998) Predicting how People Play Games: Rein- forcement Learning in Experimental Games with Unique Mixed Strategy Equilibria, Amer. Econ. Rev., 85, 848881. Hart, S. and A. Mas-Colell (2003) Uncoupled Dynamics Do Not Lead to Nash Equilibrium, Amer. Econ. Rev., 93, 1830-1836. Bereby-Meyer, Y. and A. Roth (2006) Learning in Noisy Games: Partial Reinforcement and the Sustainability of Cooperation, Amer. Econ. Rev. 7. Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments (1 lecture) Camerer, C. (2003) Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments on Strategic In- teraction, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003. 4 Crawford, V. (1997) Theory and Interaction in the Analysis of Strategic Interaction, Advances in Economics and Econometrics, Seventh World Congress of the Econometric Society, Volume 1. Nagel, R. (1995) Unraveling in Guessing Games: An Experimental Study, Amer. Econ. Rev., 85, 13131326. Costa-Gomes, M., V. Crawford and B. Boseta (2001) Cognition and Behav- ior in Normal-Form Games: An Experimental Study, Econometrica. Costa-Gomes, M. and V. Crawford, Cognition and Behavior in Two-Person Guessing Games: An Experimental Study, Working Paper. 8. Behavioral Game Theory: Models (2-3 lectures) Geanakoplos, J., D. Pearce and E. Stacchetti (1989) Psychological Games and Sequential Rationality, Games Econ. Behav., 1, 60-79. Rabin, M. (1993) Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics, Amer. Econ. Rev., 85, 1281-1302. Fehr, E. and K. Schmidt (1999) A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation, Quart. J. Econ. 114, 817-868. Bernheim, D. and A. Rangel (2004) Addiction and Cue-Triggered Decision Processes, Amer. Econ. Rev. Fudenberg, D. and D. Levine (2005) A Dual Self Model of Impulse Control, Working Paper. Koszegi, B. and M. Rabin (2006) A Model of Reference Dependent Prefer- ences, Quart. J. Econ. Heidhues, P. and B. Koszegi (2006) The Impact of Consumer Loss Aversion on Pricing, Working Paper. Dewatripont, M. and J. Tirole (2005) Modes of Communication, J. Pol. Econ. Eyster, E. and M. Rabin (2005) Cursed Equilibrium, Econometrica. Esponda, I. (2006) Behavioral Equilibrium in Economies with Adverse Se- lection, Working Paper. 5