PORTFOLIO

32 AFRI CA GEOGRAPHI C APRI L 201 3

The African elephant is an instantly recognisable
symbol of the natural wonders of our continent.
The most mega of the earths terrestrial mega-
fauna, these behemoths have stirred the imagina-
tions, emotions and adrenal glands of humans
for centuries. But our relationship with them is
and has been since before the time of the Romans
tainted by our obsession with their teeth. In
pursuing the magnificent tusks that we carve and
admire (and occasionally use), humans have
slaughtered elephants in their millions.
After a brief respite following the carnage of
the 1970s and 80s, which halved the population,
elephants are once again in the crosshairs. In an
attempt to get to grips with the scale of the crisis,
science editor Tim Jackson interviewed scientists,
researchers, NGOs and policymakers across the
conservation and trade spectrum, and filed this
special report.
TEXT BY TIM JACKSON
IVORY
apocalypse

MARI US COETZEE
34 AFRI CA GEOGRAPHI C APRI L 201 3 35 WWW. AFRI CAGEOGRAPHI C. COM
TIMELINE
SPECIAL REPORT: IVORY
For more than 10 000 years, humans have coveted ivory and elephants have paid the price. As far
back as AD 77, the Romans had wiped out North Africas elephant population. By AD 1000, Islamic states
had taken control of the East African ivory trade, while ivory from West Africa (the Ivory Coast was aptly
named) made its way across the Sahara Desert to the Mediterranean by caravan. During the 19th century
another major peak in demand occurred with the industrialisation of Europe and the US, and again in the
1970s when demand from Asia took its toll, particularly on the herds of East Africa.
A N A P P E T I T E F O R
DESTRUCTION
34 AFRI CA GEOGRAPHI C APRI L 201 3 35 WWW. AFRI CAGEOGRAPHI C. COM
1992
The Zambian government burns nine tonnes of ivory.
1999
Japan purchases 49.57 tonnes of ivory from the stockpiles of
Botswana, Namibia and Zimbabwe as agreed at CoP.
2000
The South African elephant population is downlisted from Appendix I
of CITES to Appendix II.
2002
CITES gives conditional approval for Botswana, Namibia and South
Africa to sell 60 tonnes of stockpiled ivory pending future review.
The conditions include the establishment of an adequate system
to monitor poaching, and that Japan (the only designated buyer)
provide assurances that it will control the use of the ivory and
prevent its re-export.
A massive shipment of 6.5 tonnes of poached ivory (300 tusks)
leaves Malawi, but is seized by Singapore customs. DNA forensics
show the ivory originated in Zambia.
2004
Under pressure from CITES, China recognises the need to regulate its
domestic ivory market. The country implements an ivory product reg-
istration and certication system, measures it believes will secure its
ability to buy ivory at CITES-approved sales in future.
2006
A shipment of 3.9 tonnes of ivory is seized in Hong Kong. The
shipment comes from Cameroon, but genetic testing suggests
that the tusks originated in Gabon.
According to data from the CITES-backed Elephant Trade Informa-
tion System (ETIS), there is a marked upswing in seizures of illegal
ivory shipments worldwide. The trend is also noted by the Monitor-
ing the Illegal Killing of Elephants (MIKE) programme, which starts
recording a steady increase in the levels of elephant poaching
across Africa.
2007
CITES approves the auction of 108 tonnes of ivory to Japan and
China from Botswana, Namibia, South Africa and Zimbabwe, but
institutes a nine-year moratorium on any future ivory sales. Again,
many African elephant range states oppose the sale; China, which
had anticipated a regular supply of legal ivory, feels betrayed.
2009
As per the 2007 CITES decision, China imports 62 tonnes of ivory.
Customs ofcials around the world conscate more than 16 tonnes
of elephant ivory. In fact, 20092011 are three of the top four
years for the largest quantities of ivory seized since the 1989
trade ban.
2010
CITES upholds the nine-year moratorium on legal ivory sales and
does not approve proposals by Tanzania and Zambia to downlist
their elephants to allow them to sell ivory stocks. Some observers
believe that depriving China of access to legal ivory until 2018
stimulates a surge in poaching.

1970
Demand for ivory esca lates, particularly through Central and East
Africa, and poaching becomes rampant.
1976
Total exports of raw ivory from Africa are thought to be 991 tonnes,
accounting for the deaths of an estimated 55 000 elephants a year.
19761980
Hong Kong and Japan import 83 per cent of Africas raw ivory.
1978
In the US the African elephant is listed as Threatened under the
Endangered Species Act.
1979
Iain Douglas-Hamilton (Save the Elephants) estimates a minimum
African elephant population of 1.3 million.
1980
Some 680 tonnes of ivory representing approximately 37 500
elephants a year is exported from Africa.
1989
In the decade prior to 1989, East Africa loses almost 400 000
elephants; just 155 000 remain. The continental estimate has
more than halved to about 600 000. The elephant population in
Tanzanias Selous Game Reserve declines from 109 000 in 1977
to 30 000. Uganda fares badly too, with numbers falling from
17 600 to just 1 600 during the same period. In Kenya, the
population plummets by more than 80 per cent between 1973
and 1989, from 120 000 to 15 000.
At a meeting in Switzerland, CITES bans all international trade
in ivory from African elephants. The ban is not supported by
countries that have effective elephant conservation programmes
in place; they argue that a total ban on selling ivory will hamper
their capacity to fund conservation.
1990
The international ban on ivory trade is partly successful as elephant
populations in several, but not all, range states begin to recover. In
some countries, such as the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), the
rate of poaching is thought to have slowed to about 20 per cent of
pre-ban numbers for the period to 2007. The Republic of Congo, Angola,
Central African Republic (CAR) and Zambia continue to lose a signicant
num ber of elephants, with civil war and corruption playing a key role.
1989
The Kenyan government burns 12 tonnes (2 000 tusks) of its
ivory stockpile as a public statement against the trade.
1997
Across much of Africa elephant numbers are increasing, paving
the way for a partial lift of the ivory trade ban. CITES, through
its Conference of the Parties (CoP), allows Botswana, Namibia
and Zimbabwe to downlist elephants from Appendix I (which
prohibits international trade) to Appendix II (which permits regu-
lated international trade under special conditions) and to sell
50 tonnes of raw ivory to Japanese traders. The sale is opposed
by many African countries, on the grounds that it will provide a
loophole for poached ivory to enter the international market.
2011
More than 24 tonnes of ivory are seized, representing some
2 500 elephants. It is the worst year on record for large-scale
ivory seizures since 1989.
Demand in China for ivory continues to increase: an auction
newsletter reports 11 100 ivory pieces auctioned in the
country for US$95-million, an increase of 107 per cent over
the previous year.
Following the ivory trade ban, East Africa's beleaguered elephant popu-
lations start to recover.
COPYRI GHT UNKNOWN
RUDI VAN AARDE

An IFAWemployee stands amid ivory confiscated in Singapore.

I FAW/D. WI LLETTS
TIMELINE






















In May, the US Senate Foreign Affairs Committees Congressional
hears evidence on Ivory and Insecurity: The global implications of
poaching in Africa. Testimony is provided by John Scanlon (CITES),
Iain Douglas-Hamilton (Save the Elephants) and Tom Cardamone
(Global Financial Integrity).
That same month, ofcials in Colombo, Sri Lanka, conscate
1.5 tonnes of smuggled elephant ivory 350 tusks the big-
gest ivory seizure in the countrys history. Later the government
is heavily criticised for plans to donate the tusks to a Buddhist
temple, a move that outs CITES regulations. The use of ivory in
religious ornamentation, particularly by Catholics and Buddhists,
comes under the spotlight as it is said to exacerbate poaching.
Between May and July, thieves steal ivory from government stock-
piles in Botswana, Zambia and Mozambique, agging concerns
for the security of ofcial stores.
In June, Gabons government burns 4.5 tonnes of ivory in an effort
to clamp down on the rise in elephant poaching in the country.
The following month, Kenyas government publically burns an
elephant ivory stockpile that was seized in Singapore in 2002
by the Lusaka Agreement Task Force. Authorities estimate that
about 300 elephants were killed to produce the shipment, which
is estimated to be worth US$16-million.
In October, Hong Kong customs conscate 1.9 tonnes of ivory shipped
from Tanzania and Kenya, the city's biggest-ever ivory seizure.
Spearheaded by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, in November
the US State Department launches a major foreign policy initi-
ative, Wildlife Trafcking and Conservation: A Call to Action, in
which it pledges to pursue a global strategy to protect wildlife.
The same month, Cameroon responds to the massacre at Bouba
NDjida by deploying 600 soldiers from its elite Rapid Intervention
Battalion to stop elephant poachers from Chad and Sudan enter-
ing the country. Throughout Africa, more and more rangers and
army personnel are seconded to ght the ivory trade, increasing
pressure on state coffers.
In December, in the wake of its failure to curb poaching, Tanzania
withdraws its application to sell 100-plus tonnes of stockpiled ivory
to China and Japan. Malaysia seizes 1 500 pieces of tusk the
largest haul in the countrys history that were shipped from Togo
before transiting in Spain. The consignment was en route to China.
2013
In February, four Chinese nationals caught smuggling decorative
ivory pieces, as well as 9.5 kilograms of raw ivory in Kenya, are
each ned US$340. The light penalty, typical of those in many
other African states, outrages conservationists across the world.
Gabon declares that poachers have killed 11 000 elephants in the
Minkb National Park since 2004, most in the past ve years.
At the CITES CoP in Bangkok in March, Thailand promises to amend
its laws to put an end to the ivory trade in the country. Thailand has
one of the largest unregulated ivory markets in the world, and is
second only to China as an ivory consumer.
What is CITES?
CITES (the Convention on International Trade in Endan-
gered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora) is an interna tional
agreement between nations, or parties. Its aim is to en-
sure that international trade in specimens of wild animals
and plants does not threaten their survi val. Currently,
there are 178 parties to the Convention, all of which have
committed to help protect more than 30 000 species of
plants and animals.
AFRI CA GEOGRAPHI C APRI L 201 3 36
O
n 27 October 2012, Nick Brandt took this photograph of Qumquat, one of Amboseli
National Parks best-loved and most well-known matriarchs, and her family. Twenty-four
hours later she and her two daughters were gunned down by poachers. Her five-month
old grandson (the young calf in the background) ran away and was never found. Her youngest calf
was found alongside the carcasses of her mother and sisters, where she was rescued and taken
to the David Sheldrick Wildlife Trust.
Elephant social dynamics are complex; the bonds between individuals are deep and are forged
over decades, says Cynthia Moss from the Amboseli Trust for Elephants (ATE), who first encoun-
tered Qumquat as a three-year-old calf in 1972. Elephant survival is not simply a question of abso-
lute numbers, but of access to the social and ecological knowledge that older elephants hold. When
a matriarch is killed, her younger calves often die, and the fabric of a family is torn apart, she con-
tinues. Our research in Amboseli has shown that old, experienced matriarchs increase the repro-
ductive success of every female in their family, so that there are shorter inter-birth intervals and
each calf has a higher chance of survival. Experienced matriarchs do this by making good choices
about where to go, what to eat, how to avoid danger. Removing that knowledge leaves a family vul-
nerable, apart from the psychological damage of surviving a run-in with poachers.
Qumquat was 43 when she died. Her survivors are not close maternal relatives and will have to
remake their lives around the gap that she has left, with a leader 15 years her junior.
To read more about ATE and Big Life Foundation, visit www.elephanttrust.org and www.biglife.org
TOP Qumquat in her prime with her family.
CENTRE AND ABOVE One day later, three more
elephants Qumquat (centre) and her two daughters
(one is pictured above) lie dead in the East African
savanna. The poachers got their ivory but the cost
of this tragedy goes far beyond statistics.
forget about
the NUMBERS
37 WWW. AFRI CAGEOGRAPHI C. COM
In protected areas in Kenya, research ers have been studying
elephant society for many years. The loss of senior individuals
with their impressive ivory shakes families to the core.
2012
In February the massacre of several hundred elephants in
Cameroons Bouba NDjida National Park (below) causes
an international outcry, alerting many to the poaching crisis
across Africa.
I FAW/J . LANDRY
As CoP gets underway, the Public Library of Science publish-
es the results of the largest-ever survey of forest elephants.
It shows that a staggering 62 per cent of the total population
has been killed for their ivory in the past decade.
ELI ZABETH M. ROGERS
NI CK BRANDT/BI G LI FE FOUNDATI ON
ATE (2)
THE SITUATION
39 WWW. AFRI CAGEOGRAPHI C. COM
SPECIAL REPORT: IVORY
38 AFRI CA GEOGRAPHI C APRI L 201 3

For the decade and a half following the 1989 CITES ban,
elephant poaching appeared to abate. But since 2006 there
has been a steady acceleration in the widespread killing of
the animals. In 2011 TRAFFIC, the IUCN/WWF-backed organi-
sation that monitors the illegal wildlife trade, recorded
13 large-scale seizures, each containing more than 800 kilo-
grams of ivory, that weighed an estimated 23 tonnes and
represented about 2 500 dead elephants. The International
Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW) believes that more than
25 000 African elephants, some five per cent of the entire
population, lost their lives to poachers that year.
Recently, the IUCN African Elephant Specialist Group (AfESG)
sent a questionnaire on poaching levels to 12 countries. The an-
swers revealed that poaching had indeed risen in the Demo-
cratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Central African Republic
(CAR), Cameroon, Kenya, Gabon, Mozambique, the Republic
of Congo, Tanzania and Zambia. With the possible exception
of Namibias Etosha National Park and the Kruger National
Park in South Africa, the illegal ivory trade permeates popu-
lations across the continent. Here we highlight the marked
differences in poaching rates within Central, East, West and
southern Africa, and individual countries.
the SITUATION
M
ost poaching has occurred in
Central Africa, says Tom Milliken
from TRAFFIC. One credible source says
there are only five places left in the entire
DRC that have more than 500 elephants.
This is a big shock because 15 to 20 years
ago people were talking about 100 000
elephants in that country alone. The
region is an obvious target for poachers.
The so-called hard ivory of forest ele-
phants is particularly prized in Japan,
where it is used in the manufacture of
name stamps, or hanko, and the bachi, a
traditional drumstick or plectrum. (Before
the trade ban, Japan sourced most of its
ivory from the Republic of Congo.)
The dense rainforests that blanket the
region provide ideal cover for poaching,
which is further facilitated by low levels of
law enforcement, political instability and
collaboration with armed forces and mili-
tia groups. Conditions also make it diffi-
cult to assess population status, so keeping
track of events is extremely challenging.
Gabon If you were to guess which Cent-
ral African country is home to the most
elephants, chances are you wouldnt say
Gabon. The country holds just 13 per
cent of Africas equatorial rainforests, yet
now claims over half of the continents
forest elephants, some 40 00050 000
individuals according to the
Agence Nationale des Parcs
Nationaux, the Gabonese
National Parks Agency. In
the past 18 months two
massacres have dented these
figures. In 2011, 27 ele-
phant carcasses discovered
in the open savanna areas
of Wonga-Wongue Wildlife
Reserve alluded to even
worse carnage hidden in the
parks forested areas. In
February this year, Minkb
National Park and its sur-
rounds host to the largest
population in the country
reported that it has lost
more than 11 000 elephants
since 2004.
Cameroon Although there
have been more catastrophic
killings, the death of several
hundred elephants in Bouba
NDjida National Park put
the ivory crisis on many peoples agendas.
We dont know the exact population, but
think it was mostly wiped out precise
numbers talk about 350450 elephants
killed, says Ofir Drori of LAGA Wildlife
Law Enforcement.
The country is no stranger to the ivory
trade. It was singled out in 2002 for having
Central Africas largest domestic ivory mar-
ket. Today, the main threat to its elephants
probably comes from the east, where
groups of horsemen from Chad and Sudan
have infiltrated its parks. My understand-
ing of the estimates suggests there are
2 000 savanna elephants left in northern
Cameroon, far fewer than its remaining,
forest elephant population in the south-
east, says Bas Huijbregts from WWF.
Apart from that big incident in Bouba
NDjida, these populations have not suf-
fered too much from poaching In the
forests, however, the situation is really,
really bad. A study, just published, using
the largest dataset on forest elephants ever
compiled, shows that across their range in
Central Africa, 62 per cent of all forest ele-
phants have been killed for their ivory in
the past 10 years.
Central African Republic (CAR) Until
the turn of this century much of the coun-
trys north and east was thought to be ele-
phant range. Over the past decades,
poachers have wiped out elephants across
large swathes of CAR, says Huijbregts. The
elephant population in the north-eastern
part of the country, which numbered
around 35 000 in the 1970s, has effectively
been massacred, with only 100 or so indi-
viduals remaining.
Chad Elephant numbers in Chad were
estimated at around 40 000 some 20 years
ago; now there are fewer than 2 000.
Zakouma National Park hosts the largest
remaining population, which has col-
lapsed by 90 per cent since 2005. By 2011
only 450 animals remained. Poaching,
however, has slowed dramatically since
African Parks took over the parks manage-
ment in 2010.
Republic of Congo Based on the CITES
quota system, Congo was the largest
African exporter of ivory between 1986
and 1989. Today most of the countrys
remaining elephants are found in the
Nouabal-Ndoki and Odzala-Kokoua
national parks and their surrounds. And
they are taking a beating. The Wildlife
Conservation Society (WCS) estimates that
about 5 000 elephants almost half the
population have been killed by poachers
around Nouabal-Ndoki in the past five
years. Odzala-Kokoua faces a similar situ-
ation. Elephant numbers there are estimat-
ed to have fallen from about 13 000 in
2008 to 9 000 today.
Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) The elephant
population of Africas second-largest country is currently
estimated at no more than 10 000 animals. Elephant num-
bers today are reduced and scattered in the remaining ele-
phant landscapes, says John Hart of the Lukuru
Foundation. Many of these areas are logistically difficult
and remote, while some are occupied by militias and brig-
ands. In fact, the decline in numbers can be linked with
unrest that predates 2006, with the countrys volatile east-
ern region being particularly vulnerable to poaching.
Trends in Okapi and Garamba [national parks], as well as
information from elsewhere, show that the carnage got
under way during the civil war [19982005], with increas-
ing poaching from 2008 onwards as the country stabilised
and the Chinese arrived, Hart continues. Today all major
elephant populations have poaching issues, while several
parks Virunga, Okapi, Salonga have made major invest-
ments to safeguard their elephants. In 2005 African Parks
took over the running of Garamba National Park, which
harbours the DRCs largest population, at a time when
there were widespread incursions by Sudanese poachers.
GABON
CHAD
NIGER
MALI
CTE
DIVIRE
BURKINA
FASO
CAMEROON
CENTRAL AFRICAN
REPUBLIC
SOUTH
SUDAN
ETHIOPIA
KENYA
UGANDA
TANZANIA
ZAMBIA
NAMIBIA
SOUTH
AFRICA
BOTSWANA
ZIMBABWE M
OZAM
BIQUE
DEMOCRATIC
REPUBLIC
OF CONGO
REPUBLIC
OF CONGO
Poaching
on the rise
The number of elephants
killed illegally, as a propor-
tion of the total number of
mortalities, has increased
steadily since 2006. This
graphic published by Ele-
phants in Peril (www.ele
phantsinperil.org) shows
the intensification of poach-
ing from 2002 to 2011.
2002
2006
2011
NURI A ORTEGA/AFRI CAN PARKS
CI TES MI KE PROGRAMME, 2012
40 AFRI CA GEOGRAPHI C APRI L 201 3 41 WWW. AFRI CAGEOGRAPHI C. COM
THE SITUATION
South Sudan Ironically, five decades of
conflict were kind to South Sudans ele-
phants. WCS reports that the civil war
stifled development and preserved the larg-
est intact savanna in East Africa. Since the
2005 peace deal, however, the ready avail-
ability of weapons has enabled increasing-
ly organised armed groups to traffick ivory.
The elephant population, estimated at
130 000 in 1986, has crashed to 5 000 if
South Sudan is lucky, says Paul Elkan,
WCS director for the country. He warns
that if poaching continues at present rates,
elephants could disappear from South
Sudan within the next five years.
Ethiopia has lost nearly 90 per cent of
its elephant population since the 1980s,
with the total number estimated at 1 200
in 2007. In the 1990s, elephants were
found in 16 areas ranging over 94 000
square kilometres; by 2006, fragmented
herds were found in just nine areas over
29 000 square kilometres.
Tanzania holds by far the majority of
East Africas elephants around 80 per
cent and the second-largest savanna
population after Botswana. Most of its
elephants occur in the RuahaRungwa and
Selous ecosystems. There has been a huge
increase in illegal elephant killing in
Tanzania over the past few years, says
Howard Frederick, an aerial survey special-
ist. Poaching is bad in the Selous region
now, shifting in the past three years from
western Tanzania. The government is mak-
ing a strong anti-poaching push, but the
areas are huge.
Determining how many elephants are
being killed and how many remain is a
challenge. A 2006 count made by the gov-
ernment through the Tanzanian Wildlife
Research Institute (TAWIRI) in the Selous
region suggested a population of around
74 000 elephants, though confidence lim-
its (that is, the probable range) were wide;
three years later WCS and TAWIRI counted
just 43 000 elephants for the same area.
Kenya Despite widespread publicity to
the contrary, Kenya has fared relatively
well as poaching levels escalate through
East Africa. Nonetheless, figures from
Kenya Wildlife Service indicate that poach-
ing levels are steadily increasing the
country lost 384 elephants to poachers in
2012, rising from 289 in 2011. Aerial sur-
veys in the northern SamburuLaikipia
area suggest the population decreased by
more than 1 000 in just four years to 2012,
although drought accounted for more
than half the fatalities.
According to Ian Craig of the Northern
Rangelands Trust, Elephant poaching is at
its highest level numerically in northern
Kenya since the late 1980s. It is not yet a
crisis, nor at the same level of the 1970s
and 80s, but this is purely due to the
strong response from the Kenyan govern-
ment and a greater awareness among
Kenyans of the value of wildlife, and
hence less of a window of opportunity to
allow corruption to cover large-scale
poaching. Commenting on poaching
levels across the country, he continues,
It is a widespread problem impacting all
of Kenyas elephants, with hotspots in
the TaitaTaveta ranching district and
within the LaikipiaSamburu popula-
tion. Nowhere in Kenya is immune to
this threat. The killing of 12 elephants
in Tsavo East National Park in January
2013 was the largest single incident in
the country since the 1980s.
Uganda is home to more than 4 000 ele-
phants and the population is considered
stable at the moment. Poaching of
elephants in Uganda has
increased over the past
three to four years in the
main protected areas of
Murchison Falls and
Queen Elizabeth nation-
al parks, says Charles
Tumwes i gye of t he
Ug a n d a Wi l d l i f e
Authority. The recent
increase in poaching is
highly organised, with
big businessmen using
locals to kill elephants
in return for money
once theyve delivered
the ivory. A number of
the people behind this
act i vi t y have been
tracked through intelli-
gence and arrested, and
there is a general reduc-
tion in elephant killing
in Uganda now. Even
so, 2011 was the worst
year for the countrys
el ephant s i n recent
years, with 2012 also
showing high levels of
illegal killing.
Namibia is home to some 20 000 ele-
phants and remains one of the few coun-
tries where poaching is currently not con-
sidered a major threat. In Etosha National
Park, Pierre du Preez of the Ministry of
Environment and Tourism comments, We
conduct intensive surveys using a helicopter
and land at every carcass, where we sample
and collect ivory so far we have not found
any mortalities due to poaching. The
Caprivi Strip in the north-east, where the
majority of the countrys elephants are
found, is a much higher risk area. Here the
number of elephants poached increased
from fewer than 10 in 2011 to 78 in 2012.
Botswana Our 2010 survey estimated
that there are between 120 000 and 140 000
elephants in Botswana, says Mike Chase
from Elephants Without Borders. The
Chobe District has the most elephants, esti-
mated to be about 40 000. The population
grew significantly until about 2005, but sub-
sequent surveys have yielded similar num-
bers. Most poaching occurs in the Chobe
District, along the Chobe and Linyanti
rivers, as well as around the border with
Namibia and Zimbabwe, though there is no
great threat at present, he adds. There is a
strong commitment from the government
to prevent poaching, and extensive deploy-
ment of the Botswana Defence Force to
conduct anti-poaching patrols, roadblocks
and spot checks at unannounced locations
across the country.
South Africa To date, South Africa has
avoided elephant poaching more successful-
ly than any other range state, a statement
corroborated in March by Minister of Water
and Environmental Affairs Edna Molewa,
who stated: No elephants have been
poached since the once-off sale [of ivory in
2008]. In fact, until it was stopped in 1996,
the major human activity affecting ele-
phants in the Kruger National Park was cull-
ing. Since then the elephant population in
the park and surrounding management
areas, the largest in the country by some
margin, has increased from around 8 000
to 16 500 in 2012, and continues to grow.
Even so, South Africa serves as a transit
centre for ivory leaving the continent.
Zambia The Luangwa and Zambezi val-
leys and the Kafue area are home to
Zambias major elephant populations. The
population in Kafue is presently considered
stable, says Jeremy Pope from The Nature
Conservancys Zambia programme. Lower
Zambezi National Park, with roughly 2 000
elephants, shows a slight upward trend.
According to Ian Stevenson of Conservation
Lower Zambezi, Since the mid-1990s, with
increased protection, elephant populations
have continued to grow.
Further north, the Luangwa valley hosts
the countrys largest population of ele-
phants, with an estimated 18 500 in 2008.
Speaking for North Luangwa, one of two
national parks that protect the area, Ed
Sayer of the Frankfurt Zoological Society
(FZS) says, The elephant population has
been increasing since 1989, coinciding
with a law enforcement presence. Even so,
since 2007 there has been an increase in
poaching, primarily in areas bordering the
park. The FZS maintains that overall the
Luangwa valley elephant population is
dropping, although current data suggest
that North Luangwa is stable.
Zimbabwe The last complete aerial sur-
vey of elephant range was carried out in
2001, when the population reached about
90 000, so there is little in the way of recent
reliable information on current poaching
trends in Zimbabwe, says David Cumming
from the University of Cape Town. He
reports that there have been more recent
region-specific surveys, for instance for the
middle Zambezi valley and Gonarezhou
National Park, but that none has produced
any alarming carcass ratios (the number of
elephant carcasses as a proportion of the
total population).
Mozambique Northern Mozambique
holds the highest concentration of ele-
phants in the country some 13 000
according to the latest survey. Greater
Limpopo, Gorongosa and Chimanimani
national parks follow in numbers, says
Roberto Zolho of WWF. The most recent
survey from the north suggests more than
2 500 elephants have been killed there
since 2009, when poaching started to take
off, but we think this might be an under-
estimate. The level of criminal activity
certainly suggests the population is in
decline. Poaching is highly organised
helicopters out of Pemba airport are report-
ed to be used and involves both local and
foreign poachers, though no actions have
been taken against them. Zolho cites lack
of capacity by law enforcement bodies, cor-
ruption and a weak judiciary system as
contributing factors.
A minimum of 6 500 elephants cur-
rently inhabit the entire savanna
region of West Africa. Most popula-
tions are scattered and isolated, with
many numbering fewer than 200
animals, suggesting they will go
extinct within the next few decades.
Arguably the best known are the
350 or so desert elephants of north-
ern Mali, which are now threatened
by escalating conflict. Some 90 per
cent of the populations form part of
a western pool concentrated in
Burkina Faso, but including popula-
tions from Benin, Cte dIvoire,
Ghana, Mali and Niger. Poaching lev-
els remain among the highest in
Africa. Several countries no longer
have elephants Sierra Leone, for
instance, saw its final elephants
killed in 2009 and many now have
more ivory than the animals that
produce it.
I STOCK/DAN KI TE
GRANT ATKI NSON
WHO & WHY
SPECIAL REPORT: IVORY
43 WWW. AFRI CAGEOGRAPHI C. COM 42 AFRI CA GEOGRAPHI C APRI L 201 3
full-scale ASSAULT
BLOOD IVORY
White gold or blood ivory? Ivory means
different things in different hands but,
in wildlife trafficking circles at least, an
elephant is a commodity. And how and
why it is harvested can take widely
divergent paths.
Today organised crime takes a front
seat in the illegal killing of elephants, as
it does for rhinos. Among the most no -
tori ous poachers on the continent are
armed militias who supposedly kill ele-
phants to fuel their own conflicts. To
them, ivory is a means towards a more
bloody and brutal end that serves to
destabilise some of Africas most fragile
regions and provide the catalyst for even
greater conflict. This is blood ivory.
Arguably the most notorious group
thought to be caught up in this trade is
the Lords Resistance Army (LRA), which
or i gi nat ed i n nor t her n Uganda.
Members of the United Nations Security
Council are so concerned about the
destabilising effect that LRA leader
Joseph Kony and his cronies are having
in the region that they called for an
investigation into the alleged involve-
ment of the group in elephant poaching
in December 2012. Operating thoughout
South Sudan, Uganda, the Democratic
Republic of Congo (DRC), Central
African Republic (CAR), Sudan and Chad,
the LRA has reputedly decimated ele-
phant populations in these areas. It may
be described primarily as a militia
Kony is wanted by the International
Criminal Court at the Hague for war
crimes and crimes against humanity
but ivory poaching is definitely part of
the LRAs modus operandi.
About every six weeks we rescue some-
one who has escaped from the LRA, so we
have a very regular insight into what [it is]
doing in Garamba [National Park, DRC].
We know from interviewing the escapees
that there is an expectation to source
ivory and to send it to Kony, says Peter
Fearnhead, CEO of African Parks, which
manages Garamba. In April 2012 we sent
in a patrol to keep an eye on a big herd of
elephants and ended up having a gun bat-
tle with the LRA our scouts fired more
than 1 000 rounds of ammunition in one
exchange, he says.
Recently they have become much bet-
ter equipped, he continues. Two years
ago they would have been a small, poorly
resourced group, but in this incident there
were more than 60 armed individuals.
They had lots of ammunition and lots of
guns. The size of the group African Parks
took on is not typical for a poaching
party. The LRA and those 60 men were
part of a group of about 110 people,
including women and children, who were
basically camped in the middle of
Garamba that was their base, confirms
Fearnhead.
The connection between the LRA, ivory
and arms remains speculative though.
The evidence that the LRA is killing ele-
phants in Garamba is very, very strong
we have no doubt about that. We have
some credible reports that the LRA might
be involved in the illegal trade in ivory,
but theres no confirmation yet that it is
doing so, says Paul Ronan from The
Resolve, an advocacy group looking to
end the militias reign of terror. They
could be using ivory to bribe local offi-
cials as protection money or to pro-
cure weapons or basic food and medical
supplies to keep the groups alive.
Bartering it, basically. In January 2013
The Resolve uncovered some of the LRAs
illicit ivory dealings. Several abductees
who escaped in CAR reported that a heli-
copter periodically rendezvoused with an
LRA group there and gave the rebels food
in exchange for ivory, says Ronan.
Konys army is not the only militia
thought to be linked to blood ivory. In
the Horn of Africa, the al-Qaeda-linked al-
Shabaab terrorist organisation may well
be involved too. The outfit controls large
swathes of the southern parts of Somalia
and several reports in the Kenyan press
have suggested that it is connected with
the ivory trade, although details remain
sketchy. There have been several allega-
tions claiming that known militant organ-
isations are engaged in elephant poaching
and ivory trade. INTERPOL takes these
very seriously and is looking into them,
says Bill Clark of INTERPOL. He confirms
that the Kenya Wildlife Service has
claimed that al-Shabaab is involved in the
ivory business.
HORSEMEN OF THE APOCALYPSE
Groups of armed horsemen from Sudan
rank among some of Africas most notori-
ous elephant poachers. Operating during
the dry season, they travel more than
1 000 kilometres westwards in large raid-
ing parties, reputedly with trains of cam-
els in tow to transport ivory back. Last
year they carried out the well-publicised
massacre in Bouba NDjida National Park
in north-eastern Cameroon. They are re -
sponsible for the deaths of a massive
number of elephants, decimating popula-
tions in countries such as Chad and CAR.
The method of poaching elephants here
in Chad is unlike anything we have come
across before, says Lorna Labuschagne,
who works there for African Parks. They
use horses and heavy-calibre rifles and
herd the animals towards marksmen. They
open fire indiscriminately, killing a lot of
animals outright and wounding many
more we talk of massacre sites here and
that is exactly what they are, she contin-
ues. We found 19 carcasses at one site and
seven at another, and a baby elephant was
also killed here. In other words a pretty
devastating means of killing. They used the
same techniques in Cameroon.
The organisation gained further insight
into their methods when they raided a
camp near Zakouma National Park last
year. We confiscated 1 000 rounds of .762
ammunition. Thats not for a short hunt-
ing trip. When youve got 1 000 rounds of
ammunition, youre going to harvest,
says Fearnhead. The poachers were well-
equipped other items in their possession
included a satellite phone, cellphones and
solar chargers. Over a period of six weeks
to two months they gathered an enorm-
ous amount of ivory basically shot
From corrupt militias to
poverty-stricken people
eking a living at the edges
of protected areas, the
ivory trade entices many
different people for lots
of different reasons.
ABOVE Armed with weapons and a radio, anti-
poaching rangers patrol Zakouma National Park in
Chad on horseback in anticipation of encountering
marauding horsemen fromSudan.
OPPOSITE, ABOVE A ranger holds the tusk of an
elephant poached in the DRCs Garamba National
Park, a reserve hard hit by militias in search of
blood ivory.
OPPOSITE, BELOW Bushmeat, ivory and skins
the spoils of a raid on a poachers camp in Garamba.
About every six weeks we res-
cue someone who has escaped
from the LRA, so we have a
very regular insight into what
[it is] doing in Garamba
DAVI D SANTI AGO GARCI A/AFRI CAN PARKS
NURI A ORTEGA/AFRI CAN PARKS
YVES STRANGER/AFRI CAN PARKS

44 AFRI CA GEOGRAPHI C APRI L 201 3

WHO & HOW WHO & WHY
45 WWW. AFRI CAGEOGRAPHI C. COM
everything that was possible stockpiled
it and then paid local couriers with horses
and camels to transport it out.
The equipment retrieved contained fur-
ther clues as to the horsemens activ ities.
We have photographs from their cell-
phones that show elephant massacres
somewhere else, continues Fearnhead.
We know theyre not from the Zakouma
area. The dates on the pictures are late
January 2012, which coincides more or
less with the incidents in Bouba NDjida.
We cant be certain [yet], but we think we
are getting information from this incident
on the Bouba NDjida massacres. These
are Chad nationals working with corrupt
officials in the Sudanese army and police.
AERIAL ASSAULT
African Parks has run the full gamut of
poachers. Another notorious attack on
elephants was conducted by helicopter
last year in Garamba. The attack high-
lighted the involvement of the military, as
well as the level of technology used in
some poaching incidents. Twenty-two ele-
phants died. They were shot by profes-
sional marksmen, mostly with a single
shot to the top of the head, says the
organisations Jane Edge.
Although no helicopter was seen on
the day, one registered to the Ugandan
Air Force was photographed flying very
low over Garamba on two subsequent
occasions. According to Ugandan Air
Force flight records, the helicopter flew
out of South Sudans Nzara Base, which is
run by the Ugandan military, on the day
of the elephant killings, confirms Edge.
The Ugandan authorities have declined
to explain what they were doing in
the park.
Reports of helicopters and similar levels
of sophistication have come from north-
ern Mozambique and Kenya, and fingers
have also been pointed at crim inal
elements within the military of the DRC
and South Sudan. Late in 2012, the head
of the DRCs army was sacked. The reasons
cited in the official press coverage pointed
to his selling arms to militia groups and
his involvement in elephant poaching
so there are no secrets about who is
involved in the demise of the DRCs ele-
phants, says John Hart of the Lukuru
Foundation.
FOLLOW THE MONEY
Military expediency, however, is not the
only motivating factor for poachers.
Considering the sheer amount of money
involved, it should come as no surprise
that people from all walks of life are
caught up in the ivory trade. Daniel Stiles
IUCN report Elephant Meat Trade in
Central Africa found that, despite con-
cerns over elephants dying for bushmeat,
the primary motivation for poaching, rep-
resenting more than 90 per cent of his
respondents, was ivory. They hunted for
profit, not food, he says. Well over half
of the elephant hunters said they were
paid by others to kill elephants. These
commanditaires [who order and subsidise
elephant hunts] are influential govern-
ment or military officers, businessmen or
even clerics, he writes in the report. The
commanditaires order the hunt and pro-
vide money, food and other goods to the
lead hunter, who organises the hunting
party. The commanditaire also often sup-
plies weapons and ammunition. In return,
he receives tusks. Such elephant hunts
typically include about seven men and
last up to two weeks.
Interestingly, Stiles also calculated that,
unless the tusks are very large bigger
than 20 kilograms each the meat from
the elephant is worth more than its
ivory, but its sheer mass makes realising
this value logistically difficult. The tusks
are much easier money.
At the bottom of the money chain lie
poor, rural people, many of whom live on
the borders of national parks and nature
reserves. For them, the financial rewards of
poaching are tangible and tantilising. In
the Selous [Game Reserve, Tanzania],
poachers are well known in the communi-
ties; they return home awash with cash
after delivering their poached ivory to mid-
dlemen. This cash gives them immediate
status and they become the role models for
young people, who see only the immediate
benefit of an illegal activity and criminals
who operate above the law, says Mary
Rice, executive director of the Envir on-
mental Investigation Agency (EIA).
Given the rewards poaching can bring,
the temptation is often overwhelming
and the penalties for getting caught are
little deterrent at all. Investigations car-
ried out by the EIA show a continual flow
of ivory out of the Selous. Some poaching
groups enter the reserve for periods of up
to two weeks and kill as many as 10 ele-
phants each trip, says Rice in Open
Season, the EIAs investigation into the
illegal trade in Tanzania and Zambia. The
poached ivory is then hidden, buried at
remote locations on the edge of the
reserve until it is sold to traders, usually
from Dar es Salaam. The transactions take
place in villages that have become known
hotspots for ivory trading.
Odzala-Kokoua National Park in the
Republic of Congo faces similar problems.
The poaching today is done by the local
communities surrounding the park, but
most of these people are not the culprits
but rather the victims, says Leon
Lamprecht, who manages the reserve for
African Parks. Military and police officials
are providing firearms and ammunition
to local communities to hunt elephants,
then they buy back the ivory from these
guys at minimal prices. He continues,
The main problem we face every day is
the corruption of the local authorities
including our own ecoguards that is
allowing the trade to happen. At present
the majority of our intelligence indicates
mainly West Africans and Chadians as
the traders.
COLLATERAL DAMAGE
Given the weaponry involved, and the
ever-increasing stakes, the cost of the
ivory trade cannot be counted in terms of
elephant deaths alone. Across the contin-
ent people are dying to save the species
too. Weve had up to 22 staff killed in a
year by the LRA. Garamba is a war zone.
The whole area is completely destabilised,
says Peter Fearnhead.
Further south Paul Sadala, an ivory traf-
ficker better known by his alias Morgan,
led an armed assault against the Okapi
Wildlife Reserve in June 2012 that left
seven people dead and another 30 taken
hostage. The killings were aimed at the
Institute in the Congo for Conservation
of Nature (ICCN) and the Okapi Con-
servation Project (OCP), which had dared
to target Morgans elephant poachers and
gold-miners operating illegally in the
reserve. The weapons used in the attack
were funded by ivory.
This guy doesnt care, says John Lukas,
OCP president. He kills elephants every
day. Killing animals is his business. In
2012, a similar tit-for-tat killing in Chad
saw six of Zakoumas rangers killed in
re tribution for the arrest of four poachers,
while Kenya Wildlife Service lost six per-
sonnel to poachers, including the first
female ranger to die in the line of duty.
People are not the only victims. In
some areas poisons, such as the insect-
icide Temic, are used to kill elephants. We
have seen evidence in Zimbabwe and
elsewhere in the region where poison
has been used to try to kill elephant
groups. Temic has been put in oranges
and put in places where elephants are
known to come. Sometimes even water-
holes have been poisoned, says TRAFFICs
Tom Milliken.
Elsab van der Westhuizen from the
Frankfurt Zoological Society (FZS), con-
firms similar incidents in Gonarezhou.
We consider poison one of the most
important threats at the moment and are
worried about seeing a further rise in its
use in the future, she says. Here ele-
phants have been poisoned using wild
melons and marula fruit laced with
toxin. Similar incid ents are reported from
Tanzania, where the African Wildlife
Foundation confirms that elephants were
found poisoned last year at Manyara
Ranch, close to Tarangire National Park,
and their tusks removed. Elephants
werent the only victims 200 vultures
that had fed on the carcasses also died.
ABOVE Counting the human cost. Brahim
Khamis, a ranger based in Zakouma National
Park, was killed in a surprise attack during
morning prayers. A disturbing number of rangers
in Africa have lost their lives in the line of duty.
OPPOSITE, ABOVE Vultures circle five of the
23 elephants thought to have been killed during
an aerial attack in Garamba in April 2012. On
two occasions after the incident, this Ugandan
military helicopter (INSET) was seen flying low
over the park, although Ugandan authorities
declined to explain its presence there.
OPPOSITE, BELOW In March 2013 Athanase
Edou Mebiame, a high-ranking Gabonese official
(LEFT), confessed to providing weapons and food
to poachers, and transporting ivory across
international borders using official vehicles.
The poaching today is done
by the local communities
surrounding the park, but
most of these people are
not the culprits but rather
the victims
Unless the tusks are very
large bigger than 20 kilo-
grams each the meat from
the elephant is worth more
than its ivory, but its sheer
mass makes realising this
value logistically difficult
J OHN SI DLE/AFRI CAN PARKS
ORGANI SATI ON FOR CONSERVATI ON J USTI CE
LORNA LABUSCHAGNE/AFRI CAN PARKS
SPECIAL REPORT: IVORY

47 WWW. AFRI CAGEOGRAPHI C. COM
IVORY ROUTES
SPECIAL REPORT: IVORY
46 AFRI CA GEOGRAPHI C APRI L 201 3
out of AFRICA
W
HEN IT COMES TO ELEPHANTS, WEST
Africa is an enigma. The region
has very few of the animals, yet
it hosts a booming trade in
ivory. This anomaly was first given wide-
spread attention in a 2003 report by
TRAFFIC, and Ofir Drori of LAGA Wildlife
Law Enforcement is quick to confirm
that its findings remain relevant today.
There are many countries in West Africa
with only 2030 elephants left. Of course
they have more ivory than elephants!
he says. Guinea has 30 elephants if we
are lucky we seized more ivory than
that from a single dealer. Togo has a very
tiny population; Sierra Leone has no ele-
phants remaining whatsoever, and nei-
ther does Ivory Coast. These are all
countries that are active in the trade in a
very serious way.
Last year wildlife trade researchers
Esmond Martin and Lucy Vigne surveyed
the huge ivory market in Lagos, Nigeria.
The sale of ivory has been banned here
since 2011, but the laws are simply not
enforced. This is by far the biggest ivory
market in Africa, says Martin. Ivory here
comes from all over the place most
is from countries like the Democratic
Republic of Congo (DRC), Cameroon and
the Republic of Congo in Central Africa,
but some from as far afield as Kenya and
Tanzania.
As for who is doing the buying, he
says, We didnt see any non-Chinese
people buying ivory. Many of them
would have been involved in so-called
ant trafficking the movement of small
amounts of ivory by a large number of
people for personal use or re-sale in Asia.
Martin points to statistics showing a
dramatic increase in Chinese nationals in
the country, from an estimated 2 000 in
2001 to 100 000 by 2007. Ivory is cheap
here compared to in China. Much of it is
taken out by pocket or in hand baggage.
Similarly, Angola hosts an increasing
number of Chinese nationals some
300 000 are currently working in the
country. Luanda used to be a big ivory
market we have no recent information
but theres no reason to think it isnt
still, says Martin. Angola has few ele-
phants itself, so it is likely that demand
is satisfied by the DRC.
Lagos may claim the dubious honour
of being the largest ivory market in
Africa, but there are other notorious
hotspots. Martin is convinced that
Khartoum is complicit in providing a
market for ivory poached up to 1 000
kilometres away. Khartoum gets raw
ivory from South Sudan, Central Africa
and Kenya. The city is supplied by
Sudanese horsemen returning here from
further west, he says. Like most other
domestic ivory markets, sales here are
made mostly to Chinese nationals. The
Sudanese capital also serves as conduit to
Cairo, another major African market,
though in recent years the route has
been throttled to some extent by an
increase in border security.
Cairo, of course, is situated well out-
side the range of African elephants but,
despite a decline since the 1990s, it
remains one of the largest ivory markets
on the continent. Trading in ivory is
banned here too but, again, as Martin
and Vigne discovered during their in-
vestigation in 2011, the laws are not
enforced. Raw tusks are carved, albeit
crudely, and sold. Many of its patrons
used to hail from Spain, Italy and the US,
but Chinese nationals are now the prin-
cipal buyers, with Egyptians and Gulf
Arabs increasing in prominence.
Elsewhere, Ethiopias Addis Ababa mar-
ket fluctuates in size and importance (it
was thriving when TRAFFIC conducted its
last survey in 2008), Maputo in Mozam-
bique hosts southern Africas largest mar-
ket and ivory is still being sold openly in
the DRC capital of Kinshasa.
Ofir Drori is unequivocal about the
role domestic sales play. No trade in
ivory is domestic it doesnt exist. I
would state this categorically. No ivory is
sold that does not leave the country. The
prices you have inside a country and the
prices you pay outside there is such a
huge gap that it doesnt make sense for
any ivory to be left in the country.
The real role of ivory markets, he
contends, is to connect with interna-
tional dealers. Its like an advertise-
ment to get in contact to make bigger
deals, he says. Those markets, like
Lagos, say, Were here, were reliable,
here it is. Buy something, build a trust,
we can sell you hundreds of kilograms
later. Nobody will do business with
you for 600 tusks if you havent bought
several times before and shown that
you can be trusted. This is a business
where people screw one another over,
so trust is a big deal. Its the only thing
that limits the ivory trade, otherwise it
would just go on until all the elephants
have been killed. And the prices would
go up and up and up.
A
LTHOUGH DOMESTIC AFRICAN MARKETS PLAY
a part in the international trade,
most of Africas ivory is exported
in tusk form to Asia. China is the
biggest importer, followed by Thailand
and, increasingly, Laos. Based on the
number of ivory seizures, Kenya and
Tanzania are the principal exit points
between them, the two countries account
for more than two-thirds of ivory confis-
cated en route to Asia (although seizure
rate might not be a true indicator of
shipment volume).
In terms of air freight, Kenyas Jomo
Kenyatta International Airport (JKIA)
serves as a transit hub for many West,
Central and even southern African
countries and international markets.
For instance, 456 kilograms of ivory
(158 tusks) intercepted in Bangkok in
2012 had gone there en route from
Kinshasa. Other shipments also bound
for Thailand came through JKIA via
Angola and Ghana. Looking at the data,
there is increasing evidence of ivory
being air freighted. It used to be prohibi-
tively expensive, but we have records of
shipments as large as 800 kilograms com-
ing in by air now. Thats huge very,
very expensive but its happening, says
TRAFFICs Tom Milliken, who also heads
up the Elephant Trade Information
System (ETIS).
The largest consignments, however, are
still transported by sea. INTERPOL and
ETIS regard such large-scale shipments
(800 kilograms or more) as a proxy mea-
sure for assessing the involvement of
organised crime. The engagement of
criminal syndicates in the illicit trade in
ivory between Africa and Asia is becom-
ing increasingly entrenched, says Mil-
liken. Several African countries, Angola,
Senegal, Equatorial Guinea and Togo
among them, have not submitted seizure
records since 1989, when ETIS was estab-
lished, but are implicated in hundreds of
hauls elsewhere in the world.
If seizures are anything to go by, the
dynamics of the large-scale ivory trade
are changing. For a long time, much of
the trade left Africa through the Atlantic
Ocean side Nigeria, Cameroon, Gabon.
Now its all shifted to Mombasa, Dar es
Salaam, Mozambique, says Milliken. I
think that West Africa is just too far
away from accessible elephants now. All
of those big populations along the
major roads and waterways in Central
Africa have gone. The fact that less
ivory is being intercepted in the region
seems to bear this out. Large consign-
ments of ivory moving out of West and
Central Africa have become minimal,
collectively constituting only 11 per
cent of the total of large-scale ivory seiz-
ures in the past few years, a threefold
reduction from the period 20002008.
Moreover, the ETIS data suggest that
some consignments leaving East Africa
include ivory sourced from Central
Africa. This indicates ongoing cross-
border trade from the DRC through
Uganda and on to Kenya and Tanzania
for export to Asia, says Milliken. For
now it remains unclear whether the fall
in large consignments of ivory seized out
of West and Central Africa reflects a
decline in the elephant populations in
the western part of the Congo Basin or a
switch in routes to East Africa.
Even South Africa, where elephant
poaching seems negligible, is being
implicated in the trade. There have only
been a handful of seizures in recent
years, but trafficking through the coun-
try is increasing dramatically. Take Cape
Town. In 2012 almost three tonnes of
ivory were taken into custody in the
Western Cape that is a substantial
amount, says Christina Pretorius from
the International Fund for Animal
Welfare. Her concern mirrors figures
released by Cape Nature, the provincial
conservation body. From 2002 to date,
39 cases have been registered in the
Western Cape involving 6 469 kilograms
of ivory, says Paul Gildenhuys from its
Biodiversity Crime Unit. Since 2009
there has been a drastic increase in the
number of elephant ivory cases 99 per
cent of the ivory seized in the Western
Cape since 2002.
Those markets, like Lagos,
say, Were here, were
reliable. Buy something,
build a trust, we can sell
you hundreds of kilograms
later. - Or Drori

From the continents savannas and forests to the markets of Lagos, Kinshasa and
Cairo, through the ports of Mombasa, Dar es Salaam and Cape Town and on to Asia,
the movement of ivory involves thousands of people, complex organisation, and
complicity and corruption at every level.
RI CCARDO PREVATTONI , GRI D- ARENDAL, WWW. GRI DA. NO/GRAPHI CSLI B/DETAI L/I LLEGAL- I VORY- TRAFFI CKI NG- ROUTES_486E
48 AFRI CA GEOGRAPHI C APRI L 201 3
IVORY ROUTES
O
N LEAVING AFRICA, SHIPPING ROUTES ARE
often tortuous and difficult to
trace. The 1 500 pieces of tusks
intercepted in Malaysia last
December, for instance, left the West
African port of Lom in Togo and transit-
ed in Algeciras, Spain, before moving on
to Malaysia.
All the large-scale ivory seizures seem
to be heading towards China, whether
they are confiscated there or not, says
Milliken. Six or seven years ago the
country intercepted a series of ship-
ments and, since then, its law enforce-
ment has actively targeted containers
coming from Africa carrying descrip-
tions of certain products. I will say that
China has really upped its law enforce-
ment and so the criminal syndicates
have adapted, he explains. So they
might, say, try to get the container into
Malaysia, change the documentation so
it looks like the consignment is originat-
ing from Malaysia, and then send it on
to China.
The choice of countries serving as tran-
sits depends on conditions at the time.
Milliken refers to a case in April 2011
when 707 ivory tusks were seized just
inside Vietnams border with China, its
destination. Vietnamese authorities have
got quite a bit better at controlling ivory
flow through the country, says Simon
Hedges from the Wildlife Conservation
Society. What seems to be happening as
a result is that both Laos and Cambodia
are becoming important transit routes.
Thailand too, because ivory is like water
it will follow the path of least resis-
tance. That would explain the emer-
gence of Cambodias only deep-water
port at Shihanoukville as a substitute
trade route.
And although China is considered the
worst protagonist, it is by no means the
only end-user nation. While countries like
Malaysia are primary transit points, China
and Thailand are the main markets since
the demand in Japan has really fallen off,
says Hedges. Theres a tiny bit of end use
for ivory in the Philippines, and Laos is
selling increasing amounts of ivory to tour-
ists. It remains to be seen what effect Thai-
lands recent announcement of a ban on
its domestic ivory trade will have on routes
and supply.
Who are the ivory merchants?
You cannot assume that all the syndicates
are in the Far East, says Ofir Drori. Some
of them are based here in Africa. In 2006
Hong Kong customs seized 603 tusks in a
container from Cameroon. Ostensibly it
was filled with timber, but a false compart-
ment hid a mountain of ivory. The find
prompted a high-level collaboration
between authori ti es i n Asi a and
Cameroon, and their subsequent investi-
gation uncovered two more containers,
similarly rigged, that had been used by the
same syndicate to smuggle ivory. Tusks
from 900 dead elephants could be trans-
ported at a time and, based on fragments
discovered inside, the containers were reg-
ularly recycled.
The shipments were linked to the noto-
rious Teng group, long suspected of being
involved in various criminal activities.
These are people who used to export 600
tusks out of Douala in Cameroon to the
Far East every two months, says Drori.
For two-and-a-half years they Taiwanese
nationals and one Filipino used an
importexport company operating out of a
normal house in an upmarket residential
suburb in Yaound as a front. In the
1980s, the same syndicate had operated in
a similar way in Nigeria.
So here is a criminal syndicate that has
been making around US$4-million every
two months for years, has been linked to
money laundering and drug trafficking,
and has been doing this since the 1980s.
Its the only ivory cartel in the world being
prosecuted, but now its leaders have fled
Cameroon and are on the run, says Drori.
He believes there are at least five more
syndicates like the Tengs in Africa that
have evaded authorities. It reminds me of
the arms trade. Imagine what it takes to
gather 600 tusks every two months, and to
have done this since the 1980s without
any interruption. You need to employ
hundreds of poachers and carefully coordi-
nate them. You have to control dozens of
corrupt colonels and magistrates to secure
your business. You need a hierarchy inside
your operations one very strong person
at the top who enforces this discipline,
and [makes sure that] anyone who steals
disappears. This is what the Mafia looks
like. Droris frustration bubbles over. So
many seizures and still no heads of syndi-
cates in jail. It is an amazing fact; it is an
amazing failure.
RI CCARDO PREVATTONI , GRI D- ARENDAL, WWW. GRI DA. NO/GRAPHI CSLI B/DETAI L/LARGE- SCALE- I VORY- SEI ZURES_6732
THE ASIAN MARKET SPECIAL REPORT: IVORY
51 WWW. AFRI CAGEOGRAPHI C. COM 50 AFRI CA GEOGRAPHI C APRI L 201 3
the ASIAN DILEMMA
THAILAND
T
hailand has a poor track record when
it comes to the ivory trade. Thailand
has one of the largest unregulated ivory
markets in the world and the largest in
South-east Asia, says Tom Milliken of
TRAFFIC. Although this fact is well
known in wildlife trade circles, it comes
as a surprise to most people. While trade
in Thailand is smaller than that in
China, it still exerts huge influence,
continues Milliken. Id say there is per-
haps a 25 per cent/75 per cent split in
trade between Thailand and China. And
given the size of the Chinese market,
thats huge.
So why is Thailand such a global player
in the illegal ivory trade? The country
owes its dubious notoriety to its own legis-
lation, which sanctions trade in ivory
from domestic, working elephants, al -
though not wild Asian elephants. This
industry is wholly unregulated, so there
are no checks into the origin of the ivory,
which can legally be displayed and sold in
Thai markets. The consequence? Perfect
conditions for laundering African ivory
into the market, which mixes it un curb -
ed with that from local elephants.
Thailand is also the largest tourist des-
tination in the region, exposing many
foreigners to ivory. In China the ivory is
consumed by Chinese, which means
that it stays in China for the most part.
But in Thailand most of the buyers are
European, North American and Aus-
tralian tourists, says Milliken. With so
many foreign visitors, a healthy percent-
age of the seizures made in the US,
Europe and Australia are trinkets from
Thailand.
The most obvious way to curb the
trade would be to regulate the industry,
which would be difficult to enforce, or to
shut it down completely. Theres no pro-
vision within the legislation at the
moment to discriminate against African
ivory, so the whole system here needs
better legislation and enforcement, DNA
testing and legal protection of products
from African elephants, says Elisabeth
McLellan of WWF. There are a lot of
provisions that need to be in place to
make a workable system in Thailand.
And because there are so many [require-
ments], we are saying that a ban is the
best way out of this situation.
In 2002, the Elephant Trade Infor-
mation System (ETIS) was established to
track the illegal trade in ivory and other
elephant products. According to its
records, since its inception Thailand has
been in the top handful of countries
implicated in the illegal trade, so while
calling for a ban may seem like an over-
reaction, repeated calls to tighten up the
ivory trading system in the country have
failed to produce results. For more than a
decade there have been requests from
CITES to address some of these issues and
these have not been implemented to a
necessary level, continues McLellan.
At the opening of the CITES Conference
of the Parties held in Bangkok last month,
Thai Prime Minister Yingluck Shi nawatra
promised to end the nations involve-
ment in the trade. We will amend the
national legislation with the goal of put-
ting an end to the ivory trade and to be in
line with international norms, she said.
While her statement is potentially seen as
a big step forward, it is not clear how it
may affect domestic ivory trade in the
country and, given its poor history of fol-
lowing up on such promises, when those
changes might be implemented.
JAPAN
J
apan is a story of demand reduction,
says Milliken. In its heyday the
Japanese market consumed 300 tonnes of
ivory a year, easily. Now the dealers tell
me they are using between five and
10 tonnes that are coming from legal
stocks of ivory and that they had lots of
stock when the ban came in. The ETIS
data confirm that Japan isnt a major
country of concern. For about a decade
now we havent seen any large-scale
ivory seizures directed to Japan.
According to wildlife trade experts
Lucy Vigne and Esmond Martin, who
surveyed the Japanese ivory markets in
2009, this dip in demand can be ex -
plained, in part, by the countrys eco-
nomy, which has been in recession since
1990. Fewer Japanese people are buying
luxury ivory goods, they point out. The
Japanese are steadily becoming more
westernised and ivory has therefore
become less fashionable.
In fact when Vigne and Martin carried
out their survey, some 80 per cent of
tusks were being used to produce signa-
ture stamps called hankos. But that has
changed. The seals were used to sign
everything from pay cheques and bank
transactions to documents for buying a
car. But Japan has recently passed legis-
lation making name seals obsolete. Now
people use signatures, says Milliken.
These days, the most common material
for hankos is horn from the Asian do -
m estic water buffalo.
Other factors that have reduced
demand include strict government regula-
tions that, unlike those in China, act as a
deterrent to ivory carvers and vendors.
And with the exception of antiques,
the export of ivory is also prohibited in
Japan in line with the 1990 CITES ban,
which means foreign visitors may no
longer buy these items to take home.
More recently, Tomoaki Nishihara from
the Widlife Conservation Society has
looked at demand. In Japan there is con-
stant and stable demand for hard or
In recent times the main
ivory markets have been
centred in the Far East:
China for its sheer size
and voracious appetite
for the product; Thailand,
where the market, for
different reasons, is big
too; and Japan, once a
big league player, but now
showing a diminishing
demand. So what makes
these markets tick?
ABOVE Forest elephants. The dense tusks of
these elusive pachyderms, which inhabit the
rainforests of West and Central Africa, are in
regular demand on the Japanese market.
LEFT A haul of ivory that was confiscated in
Singapore and returned to Tsavo East National
Park, Kenya.
OPPOSITE, ABOVE Thailand hosts one of the
largest and most active ivory industries in the
world. Its customers include Western tourists,
especially those from the US, Europe and
Australia.
OPPOSITE, BELOW Thai Prime Minister Yingluck
Shinawatra has pledged to end her countrys
involvement in the ivory trade.
In Japan there is constant and stable demand for
hard or forest elephant ivory
I STOCKPHOTO. COM/AKABEI

CI TES
MARTI N HARVEY
I FAW/D. WI LLETTS
52 AFRI CA GEOGRAPHI C APRI L 201 3 53 WWW. AFRI CAGEOGRAPHI C. COM
WHO & HOW THE ASIAN MARKET SPECIAL REPORT: IVORY
forest elephant ivory, he says. One par-
ticular item that uses this so-called hard
ivory (the ivory of forest elephants is
more dense than that of savanna ele-
phants) is the bachi, the plectrum of a
shamisen, a popular traditional Japanese
musical instrument. A single bachi uses
one large tusk weighing 15-plus kilo-
grams to manufacture. This trend dif-
fers from that in China, which has a
higher consumption of ivory but where
no preference for soft or hard ivory
exists, Nishihara explains. And while
there is no strong evidence that ivory
from forest elephants is being smuggled
into Japan, he is worried that the remain-
ing stocks of hard ivory in the country
will not be sufficient to meet demand.
His research suggests that local dealers
have limited knowledge of the domestic
ivory trade control system and have not
applied it. The Japanese ivory manage-
ment system should be re-evaluated and
improved, focusing on hard ivory stock
management, he warns.
CHINA
W
hile Japans economy might be in
decline, Chinas continues to boom,
and with it demand for ivory. Ivory is an
ostentatious form of wealth, says Peter
Knights from WildAid. What you see
here is a huge consumption of brands
and luxury goods, and ivory is just
another luxury item.
In theory China has a regulated ivory
market, but its rules only apply if the prod-
uct is bought according to the countrys
ivory product registration and certification
system. Sales are restricted to Chinese
nationals and the product may not be trad-
ed outside the country. The system was
developed in 2004 to meet CITES condi-
tions to purchase stockpiled ivory, and
specifies that only government-approved
ivory processing and retail outlets can
engage in trade.
While this might work in theory, in
practice the system is widely abused.
According to IFAWs 2011 report Making
a killing, which looked into the ivory
trade in five coastal cities in China, there
were nearly twice as many unlicensed
ivory dealers as licensed ones. Of the
158 ivory carving and retail outlets sur-
veyed, 101 had no licences. Illegal laun-
dering of ivory is rife even in supposedly
legal facilities too 60 per cent of
licensed retailers violated the system in
some way to launder contraband ivory.
Taken together, the unlicensed and non-
compliant ivory facilities outnumbered
legal ones nearly six to one.
The registration system is abused too.
Every piece of ivory weighing more than
50 grams requires an identification card
and yet IFAW found that 20 of 32 accredit-
ed retail shops did not have the required
cards to match their ivory products. And in
many licensed shops, vendors discouraged
customers from taking the identification
cards that corresponded to the item pur-
chased. When people sell a piece of ivory
they hang on to the permit and use it as
many times as they want. So effectively
you can launder poached ivory though the
legal system; it has all the appearance of
being legal, but its from an illegal source,
confirms Knights.
Ivory sales have surged too. The total
number of ivory items auctioned on
record in mainland China in 2011 was
more than double that of the previous
year. According to an auction newsletter,
11 100 ivory pieces were reportedly auc-
tioned in 2011, with an estimated price of
US$95.4-million. Thats 170 per cent more
than the 2010 figure.
In China economic growth is incred-
ibly fast, and so education, awareness
and general worldliness are not keeping
pace, says Knights. People there are sim-
ply not aware of the situation for ele-
phants in Africa. Cutting demand will be
key to saving the continents elephants, a
message that is conveyed by WildAids
mantra When the buying stops, the kill-
ing can too.
Our conclusion is that if you dont stop
the market, whatever you do in Africa,
youre not going to stop ivory leaking
out, Knights declares. Weve recently
done a survey of the three main cities in
China (Beijing, Shanghai and Chang-
zhou) [that demonstrated that] 50 per
cent of the people are not aware there is
any sort of elephant poaching problem in
Africa, 50 per cent have no idea how to
differentiate legal from illegal ivory, and
50 per cent think that the ivory comes
from natural elephant mortality.
But thats not to say things cant be
turned round. A lot of stuff I think the
rest of the world takes for granted in
terms of ivory and elephant poaching
has just not been publicised in China,
reckons Knights. Ive heard some people
saying people have been educated and it
hasnt worked, but they really havent
been educated. It hasnt been seen as an
issue that pertains to China.
How to get that message across, though,
remains one of the principal challenges.
One of the biggest successes to date has
been IFAWs Mom, I got teeth posters,
which depict an elephant mother and her
calf walking into the sunset across the
African savanna. Displayed at airports and
in subways in major cities across the
country, the posters aim to raise consumer
awareness about the fact that every piece
of ivory comes from a dead elephant if
you dont buy ivory, the animals wont
die. In 2011, the campaign message was
adopted into Chinas national college
entrance exams, which were taken by
nine million applicants.
WildAid has recently launched an ivory
awareness campaign on the back of their
successful shark-fin drive. They plan to
get into consumers faces. It doesnt mat-
ter what CITES does or what biologists say
or what conservationists write. At the end
of the day its about the eco nomies,
claims Knights. The only way to inter-
cede is to inject yourself into the eco-
nomies and that is basically why we are
using advertising techniques. We sell
conservation in the same way that Nike
sells sneakers. We use celebrities, we use
slick advertising, we try to get repetition
in your face all the time and to brand
conservation as a positive attribute and
con sumption as a negative one.
Knights likens this to a new war, a con-
temporary battleground for conservation.
Reports, biology, international confer-
ences are the old world its obviously all
important and its great but global
economies are moving so quickly, espe-
cially in the case of China. Not only is
the pace very fast, but the scale is vast,
not like any other phenomena weve seen
on the planet before.
Anything that gets caught up in that
maelstrom is going to be problematic.
And so all we can do is try to keep pace
by using the very techniques that are
growing the economy advertising
space, video billboards were trying to
utilise that to put a different perspective
on things.
Part of the change that China needs is a
growing consciousness about consumer-
ism. Weve been lucky enough to get some
of the most prominent Asian voices, such
as (basketball star) Yao Ming and actor
Jackie Chan, on our side to tell people:
Hang on a minute, this is not a good
idea. Short of an economic collapse in
China, the two elements most likely to
reduce demand to the benefit of Africas
elephants are an ivory registration and cer-
tification system that works and a change
in consumer attitude towards ivory.
ABOVE Animal-friendly souvenirs are available
in China. These were found at the Panjiayuan
Antiques Market in Beijing.
OPPOSITE, ABOVE On a billboard, popular
basketball star Yao Ming exhorts his country-
men to support the war against ivory trading.
OPPOSITE, BELOW Ivory items on sale in China.
WI LDAI D
I FAW/LI SA HUA
I FAW/GUO TI ELI U

55 WWW. AFRI CAGEOGRAPHI C. COM
SOLUTIONS
SPECIAL REPORT: IVORY
54 AFRI CA GEOGRAPHI C APRI L 201 3
RUDI VAN AARDE
LAGA Wildlife Law Enforcement. These are
the statistics from the countries we work in.
This is how much of a threat it is.
Corruption is also pervasive in the Demo-
cratic of Congo (DRC) and Tanzania, where
ivory poaching and trafficking are rife,
despite the best attempts of authorities who
are on the right side of the law.
Even if those involved in the trade are
actually arrested, prosecuting them suc-
cessfully is far from guaranteed. In 80 per
cent of legal cases against wildlife traffick-
ers in Central Africa, I can tell you who
was trying to bribe whom we even have
recordings of judges and magistrates as
they were trying to negotiate a bribe. Some
of the people involved are public officials
we put an army captain behind bars, a
police commissioner behind bars, a senior
divisional officer [the highest local authori-
ty for a province] behind bars, Drori con-
tinues. Denouncing corruption doesnt
work. The answer is to fight it in real time
and thats what we do.

PUNISHMENTS TO FIT THE CRIME
The case of the Chinese nationals let off on
a US$340 fine for smuggling ivory through
Kenya (see An appetite for destruction,
page 34) highlights the need for Africa to
treat wildlife crime more seriously. In too
many countries, even if an ivory poacher
or trader is arrested and tried, poaching is
regarded as nothing more than a petty
offence. In South Sudan lack of adequate
legal recourse is a real problem. Gabriel
Changson Chang, the countrys wildlife,
conservation and tourism minister, is quot-
ed as saying We have apprehended so
many poachers, caught red-handed ... but
because of this legal vacuum it is very diffi-
cult to prosecute them.
There is, however, a growing realisation
of the seriousness of wildlife crimes, partic-
ularly when big business is involved.
Kenyas new Wildlife Bill, currently under
review, proposes much stiffer penalties for
ivory-related convictions, and Uganda is
currently amending its Wildlife Act so
that poaching carries a minimum fine of
US$75 000 and a 10-year prison sentence.
The Republic of Congo may implement
similar measures. Owing to corruption lev-
els, we are pushing very hard for a presi-
dential decree to create a National
Prosecuting Unit on endangered species,
with a dedicated prosecutor empowered to
arrest any perpetrators, regardless of their
position, says Leon Lamprecht, who works
in the country for African Parks.
In the wake of its shocking poaching sta-
tistics this year, Gabon is also keen to
increase penalties new legislation will up
the prison term for commercial ivory
poaching to three years, 15 if organised
crime is involved.

HEARTS & MINDS
While bolstering conservation services and
bringing in the army are important, there
are other potential solutions that could
work on the ground. Low-tech solutions
can be just as useful, as shown by the suc-
cess of the community conservation move-
ment in the north of Kenya and in
Namibia, reasons Iain Douglas-Hamilton
of Save the Elephants. In Kenya, Ian Craig
oversees the Northern Rangelands Trust
and has first-hand experience of the bene-
fits of community engagement. Theyre
seeing better security for themselves, [and]
money being generated from tourism
going into education, water projects.
Where these benefits are clean and clear to
communities, elephants are being success-
fully protected by local people, he says.
If value in activities other than poaching
can be found, then the incentives to kill
elephants are reduced. Commercial hunt-
ers are the proximate cause of elephant
poaching in Central Africa and according
to them, they would stop killing elephants
if alternative sources of income were avail-
able, says Dan Stiles in his IUCN report
Elephant meat trade in Central Africa.
Special efforts should be made with these
hunters to provide education, training and
employment as an incentive to cease kill-
ing elephants.
But, competing with steadily increasing
ivory prices is difficult. During a recent
visit to Mozambique, we were told that
some individuals were leaving secure and
relatively well-paid jobs in the tourism and
hunting industry in Niassa [National
Reserve] to work as ivory couriers at best
a few days per month because the remu-
neration was so much better, warns Mary
Rice, executive director of the Environ-
mental Investigation Agency (EIA).

COORDINATING COOPERATION
Trafficking relies on porous borders, cor-
rupt officials and strong networks of organ-
ised crime, all of which undermine our
mutual security, said then Secretary of
State Hillary Clinton in 2012, as she called
for a global strategy to dry up the demand
for trafficked wildlife goods. Where crimi-
nal gangs can come and go at their total
discretion, we know that begins to provide
safe havens for other sorts of threats to
people and governments, she added. This
is a global challenge that spans continents
and crosses oceans, and we need to address
it with partnerships that are as robust and
far-reaching as the criminal networks we
seek to dismantle.
But between the countries involved in
the ivory trade, both in Africa and the Far
East, these kinds of partnerships are tenu-
ous as best. Obviously, there isnt enough
cooperation, thats why the situation is so
serious, says Bill Clark, Wildlife Crime
Officer for INTERPOL. We are aware of this
and are taking substantive steps to
enhance it. In 2012 the organisation ran
Operation Worthy, involving 14 countries
across East, West and southern Africa and
targeting criminal organisations involved
in the illegal ivory trade. To date, it has
resulted in more than 200 arrests and
the seizure of nearly two tonnes of contra-
band ivory. It brought together some
300 officers from a range of agencies,
including police, customs, environmental

the way AHEAD

FIGHTING FIRE WITH FIRE
Throughout Africa, protecting elephants is
being given greater priority. More rangers
are being put on the ground and many are
better equipped. In countries such as
Chad, Gabon, Cameroon, Botswana and
Namibia, the army has been called in to
supplement anti-poaching efforts. Gabon
has reportedly more than quadrupled its
park staff in the past three years and has
increased its budget 15-fold to pursue
poaching gangs, while Cameroon sent in
600 members of its special military forces,
the Rapid Intervention Battalion, in the
wake of events at Bouba NDjida National
Park. Botswana recently increased the
number of soldiers and police officers that
patrol its protected areas, and the
Namibian Defence Force has been enlisted
to track poachers in the Caprivi region.
Modern technologies, such as unmanned
aerial vehicles (UAVs), have been touted as
well (see Africa Geographic, February 2012).
All this, however, comes at a fiscal cost
that African range states must pay, even
though they are not the drivers behind
increased trade. Bas Huijbregts, WWFs
Head of Policy Illegal Wildlife Trade in
Central Africa, explains: We need to cre-
ate that link between areas where ivory is
poached, transit countries and demand
countries. Hundreds of thousands of
euros must be invested in terms of minis-
tries of defence, wildlife departments and
intelligence communities, re-routed from
the normal security tasks. Surely such
costs cannot be sustained as poaching
intensifies?

COMBATING CORRUPTION
Corruption is a major challenge across the
continent. Even when poachers and ivory
traffickers are caught, bringing them to
book is another issue that undermines ele-
phant conservation. Imagine how dysfunc-
tional a police force is when 85 per cent of
its work will not produce any arrests
because of corruption, says Ofir Drori from
So, what are we going to do? With escalating
poaching, a notable increase in the involvement
of organised crime and a rampant market in Asia,
principally China, the future looks bleak. Theres
a feeling among a very large number of people
that we dont know what to do about the current
crisis. Last time, back in the 1970s and 80s, the
obvious thing to do was to have a ban, says
Simon Hedges, who heads up the ivory pro-
gramme of the Wildlife Conservation Society
(WCS). Now of course we have a ban, yet illegal
trade is escalating. A lot of the obvious things
to do are no longer available, because theyve
already been done though Im not sure thats
completely true, he continues. Some things just
need to be done better, or done in more places.
OPPOSITE There is no magic solution to the poach-
ing threat facing elephants; rather, more work done
better needs to happen at multiple levels.
BELOW A member of an elite rapid response unit
in Garamba National Park, the DRC. African coun-
tries are starting to beef up on-the-ground security
in protected areas, but this means redirecting
resources within budgets that are already
stretched.
DAVI D SANTI AGO GARCI A/AFRI CAN PARKS
What to do? There seems to be no clear
directive, though destroying the ivory is
one option. Last year, both Kenya and
Gabon burned government-held stock-
piles. While neither country had any inten-
tion of applying to sell the ivory, at least
now it cant fall into the wrong hands.

CONSUMER CAMPAIGNS
Essentially, if there were no demand for
ivory, elephants would not be killed. Or, as
Iain Douglas-Hamilton puts it, The root of
the problem lies in excessive demand;
attempts to save the elephants will fail
unless it is tackled. Appetite for ivory can
be changed, as it was in the West and in
Japan, but such shifts take time, and
awareness of what is happening to
elephants must rapidly be shared in ivory
consumer countries in the East. Getting
that message across is something his
organisation, Save the Elephants, has
worked closely on, together with the char-
ity WildAid.
Using celebrities in campaigns isnt a
new idea, but it works. Take Yao Ming
former NBA basketball star, flag bearer for
China at both the 2004 and 2008 Olympic
Games and commentator on the games
for Chinese television. In 2012 he travelled
to Africa for the first time to learn about
and raise awareness of the plight of Africas
elephants and rhinos.
The campaign and public service
announcements received widespread cov-
erage in China, assisted by Yaos popular
blog, read by more than a million people
in the country. In it he writes, After wit-
nessing how illegal ivory was obtained, I
really was speechless it was a harrowing
experience I never want to repeat, but
something that everyone thinking of buy-
ing ivory should see the wastefulness of
these animals cruelly slaughtered just so
that a small part of them could be used.
Would anyone buy ivory if they had wit-
nessed this?
Douglas-Hamilton sums up what many
of us feel. Yaos emotional response to
living, breathing, playing elephants and
to horrific faceless carcasses revealed the
powerful commonal i ty of human
responses and awareness needed to save
elephants.
56 AFRI CA GEOGRAPHI C APRI L 201 3
SOLUTIONS
protection agencies, veterinary services,
airport security, ministries of tourism and
national prosecuting authorities.
In 2010 the International Consortium to
Combat Wildlife Crime (ICCWC), a collab-
oration between CITES, INTERPOL, the
United Nations Office on Drugs and
Crime, the World Bank and the World
Customs Organization, was established
with the aim of supporting wildlife law
enforcement at both national and interna-
tional levels. One concern it hopes to
address is the dearth of law enforcement
actions that follow large-scale ivory
seizures.
Even at a national level, there is a need
for more coordinated law enforcement
efforts between appropriate organisations.
Bas Huijbregts elaborates: With more
arrests there is increasing information
coming from poachers, so were getting a
picture of at least part of those networks.
The problem is that it is fragmented
because law enforcement agencies do not
really collaborate. Weve consulted with
INTERPOL and, through TRAFFIC, were
pushing Central African governments to
set up national coordination units com-
prising elements of different law enforce-
ment agencies parks, wildlife, police,
NGOs, justice interior, customs, defence
to exchange data.

FOLLOW THE FORENSICS
In 2001 Sam Wasser from the University of
Washington, US, started a genetic map of
Africas elephant populations. Given that
DNA can be extracted from tusks, it is now
possible to overlay DNA profiles from con-
fiscated ivory and to work out where it
was poached. Among other successes, his
laboratorys work has been crucial in trac-
ing two large seizures back to their origins
the one mostly from Zambia, the other
from Gabon. INTERPOL is acutely aware of
the value genetic evidence provides for an
investigation.
I would like to see it used much more,
but it requires that seizing agencies incor-
porate DNA analysis into their many rou-
tine procedures, says Bill Clark. It is not
absolutely simple sampling must con-
form to an established protocol and with
both scientific and forensic requirements.
Ivory, even small samples, requires CITES
applications and certificates, while ana-
lyses cost money. Also, Asia needs to work
more closely with Africans when a seizure
is made.
Recently, Hong Kong expressed reluc-
tance to hand over samples for forensic
testing while criminal investigations are
still open, even though the results could
prove useful for prosecutions. Its symp-
tomatic of a trend that frustrates Wasser.
The problem is that most countries have
been very resistant to turning over their
seizures for DNA testing. When we do get
samples to test, it is often a year or more
after the event, he says. Its been a war of
attrition and many NGOs and other
organisations have finally realised that
more pressure needs to be applied to get
these countries to do the right thing.
Wasser works closely with INTERPOL and
NGOs that support DNA testing. Its time
for a change. DNA testing is one sure
method of targeting the hotspots and
directing enforcement to areas being tar-
geted repeatedly. However, CITES has yet
to seriously advocate this approach.

CALL IN THE DOGS
The use of sniffer dogs to detect ivory in
transit is becoming more widely recog-
nised as a weapon in the arsenal against
the trade. Since Kenya Wildlife Service
(KWS) introduced sniffer dogs at Kenyas
airports in 2009, they have netted more
than eight tonnes of raw and worked
ivory. Their use is starting to take off in
southern Africa too. Our sniffer dogs are
trained to detect both rhino horn and
ivory, and are currently deployed at vari-
ous cargo warehouses at OR Tambo
International Airport in South Africa, says
Kirsty Brebner from the Endangered
Wildlife Trust (EWT). We will soon be
expanding to other potentially high-risk
areas. With the assistance of TRAFFIC, it
looks as though Mozambique may shortly
approve the use of sniffer dogs too, while
cities such as Lusaka may also see their
deployment.

SECURING THE STOCKPILES
Elephant range states keep stockpiles of
their ivory. Tanzania, for instance, holds
more than 100 tonnes, which it consid-
ered applying to CITES for permission to
sell, while Zimbabwes vaults contain
50 tonnes. These stockpiles comprise
ivory retrieved from elephants that have
died of natural causes or, in the case of
countries like South Africa, through cull-
ing, as well as that seized from poachers.
With permission from CITES, this ivory
could be sold legally. (Anything confiscat-
ed from poachers is excluded doing
otherwise would open up potential laun-
dering routes.)
Keeping piles of ivory is a risky busi-
ness. Having a stockpile in any location is
always a concern, says the International
Fund for Animal Welfares (IFAW) Grace
Ge Gabriel. Last year stockpiles were
stolen in Tanzania and Zambia. Its impor-
tant to maintain security, because em-
ployees were implicated in both the ivory
thefts an indication of the level of cor-
ruption in those countries. Botswana and
Mozambique also lost ivory out of suppos-
edly secure facilities. In several Asian
countries as well, including Thailand, the
Philippines and Malaysia, confiscated
ivory has gone missing.
ABOVE Consumer campaigns aimed at edu-
cating tourists and end-user countries are
vital. There is an assumption that people who
buy ivory know about the price that elephants
and other species have paid for their trin-
kets, but this is by no means the case.
LEFT Elephant range states accumulate
ivory stockpiles, mostly from animals that
have died of natural causes. Security around
these stores is a huge concern, given the lev-
els of complicity and corruption involved in
the ivory trade, and has contributed to the
decision by a number of countries to burn
the tusks.
OPPOSITE Sam Wassers ivory DNA work
has the potential to play an important role in
the prosecution of trafficking cases, but
incorporating sample collections, which must
conform to a series of protocols, as well as
obtaining the necessary CITES permits and
paying for analyses, is a complex process.
KRI STI AN SCHMI DT FOR WI LDAI D
I FAW/J . DECAUX
I FAW/S. COOK
57 WWW. AFRI CAGEOGRAPHI C. COM