0% found this document useful (0 votes)
86 views

Chapter 8 Linear Programming: Answer 1

This document provides a linear programming problem to minimize total production costs. Variables are defined as C representing units of product 1 and D representing units of product 2. The objective is to minimize costs of C at $100 per unit plus costs of D at $80 per unit. Constraints include minimum production requirements, production ratios, and resource constraints for plating, circuitry, and assembly. The problem is graphed by plotting the constraint equations to find the feasible region, which is labeled on the graph.

Uploaded by

Andin Lee
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
86 views

Chapter 8 Linear Programming: Answer 1

This document provides a linear programming problem to minimize total production costs. Variables are defined as C representing units of product 1 and D representing units of product 2. The objective is to minimize costs of C at $100 per unit plus costs of D at $80 per unit. Constraints include minimum production requirements, production ratios, and resource constraints for plating, circuitry, and assembly. The problem is graphed by plotting the constraint equations to find the feasible region, which is labeled on the graph.

Uploaded by

Andin Lee
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 13

Chapter 8 Linear Programming

Answer 1
(a)
M F
Contribution per unit $96 $110
Litres of material P required 8 10
Contribution per litre of material P $12 $11
an!in" 1 2
Produ#tion$sales (units) 1%000 2%&2'
[1.5] [1.5]
&1%2'0 litres of P less (1%000 ( 8) for M ) 2&%2'0 litres for F "i*in" a total produ#tion
of 2%&2' units (2&%2'0$10)+
(b)
M F ,otal Marks
($000) ($000) ($000)
-ales 200 .88+2'0 688+2'0 [1]
/ariable #osts0
Material P 20 '8+12' 18+12'
Material 2 .0 .6+'00 86+'00
3ire#t labour 28 81+&1' 109+&1'
4*er5ead 16 .6+'00 62+'00
10. 2&2+'00 &&6+'00 [2]
Contribution 96 2''+1'0 &'1+1'0
Fi(ed #osts $(1'0%000 6 '1%1'0) 201+1'0 [1]
Profit 1..+000 [4]
(#)
Let M ) number of units of M produ#ed for period 1
F ) number of units of F produ#ed for period 1
7 ) total #ontribution
Ma(imi8e 7 ) 96M 6 110F (produ#t #ontributions) sub9e#t to0 [0.5]
8M 6 10F &1%2'0 (material P #onstraint) [0.5]
10M 6 'F 20%000 (material 2 #onstraint) [0.5]
.M 6 'F 11%'00 (dire#t labour #onstraint) [0.5]
:8;1
M 1%000 (ma(imum demand for M) [0.5]
F &%000 (ma(imum demand for F) [0.5]
,5e abo*e #onstraints are plotted on t5e "rap5 s5o<n in t5e follo<in" fi"ure0
[3 marks]
Material P= Line from M ) &%906+2'% F ) 0 to F ) &%12'% M ) 0
Material 2= Line from M ) 2%000% F ) 0 to F ) .%000% M ) 0
3ire#t labour= Line from M ) .%&1'% F ) 0 to F ) &%'00% M ) 0
-ales demand of M= Line from M ) 1%000
-ales demand of F= Line from F ) &%000
,5e optimal solution o##urs <5ere t5e lines in t5e abo*e Fi"ure interse#t for material
P and 2 #onstraints+ ,5e point #an be determined from t5e "rap5 or mat5emati#all> as
follo<s0
:8;2
8M 6 10F ) &1%2'0 (material P #onstraint)
10M 6 'F ) 20%000 (material 2 #onstraint)
multipl>in" t5e first equation b> 1 and t5e se#ond equation b> 20
8M 6 10F ) &1%2'0
20M 6 10F ) .0%000
subtra#tin" ?12M ) ? 8%1'0
M ) 129+166
-ubstitutin" for M in t5e first equation0
8(129+166) 6 10F ) &1%2'0
F ) 2%'.1+661
[1 mark for the answers of M an !]
(d)
$
Contribution0 (129 units of M at $96) 69%98.
(2%'.2 units of F at $110) 219%620
&.9%60.
Less0 fi(ed #osts 201%1'0
Profit 1.1%8'.
[2 marks]
(e)
Mo*in" from t5e solution in (#) <5ere t5e lines interse#t as a result of obtainin" an
additional litre of material 2 "i*es t5e follo<in" re*ised equations0
8M 6 10F ) &1 2'0 (material P #onstraint)
10M 6 'F ) 20 001 (material 2 #onstraint) [1 mark]
,5e *alues of M and F <5en t5e abo*e equations are sol*ed are 129+&&& and
2%'.1+'&&+ ,5erefore% M is in#reased b> 0+161 units and F is redu#ed b> 0+1&. units
"i*in" an additional total #ontribution of $1+292 @0+161 A $96) ? (0+1&. A $110)B per
additional litre of 2+ ,5erefore t5e s5ado< pri#e of 2 is $1+292 per litre+ [3 marks]
:8;&
Answer 2
(a)
Let C ) number of units of CL produ#ed ea#5 <ee!
D ) number of units of DM produ#ed ea#5 <ee!
7 ) total #ontribution
,5e linear pro"rammin" model is0
Ma(imi8e 7 ) .0C 6 &0D (produ#t #ontributions) sub9e#t to
.C 6 .D 120 (materials #onstraint)
.C 6 2D 100 (labour #onstraint)
C 6 2D '0 (platin" #onstraint)
C% D 0
,5e abo*e #onstraints are plotted on t5e follo<in" Fi"ure+ ,5e optimum output is at
point C on t5e "rap5% indi#atin" t5at 20 units of CL and 10 units of DM s5ould be
produ#ed+ ,5e optimum output #an be determined e(a#tl> b> sol*in" t5e simultaneous
equations for t5e #onstraints t5at interse#t at point C0
:8;.
.C 6 .D ) 120
.C 6 2D ) 100
-ubtra#tin" 2D ) 20
D ) 10
C ) 20
,5e ma(imum <ee!l> profit is0
(20 ( $.0) 6 (10 ( $&0) ? $100 fi(ed #osts ) $.00
(b)
,5e present ob9e#ti*e fun#tion is .0C 6 &0D and t5e "radient of t5is line is ?.0$&0+ Ef
t5e sellin" pri#e of DM <ere in#reased% t5e #ontribution of DM <ould in#rease and
t5e "radient of t5e line (?.0$&0) <ould de#rease+ ,5e #urrent optimal point is C
be#ause t5e "radient of t5e ob9e#ti*e fun#tion line is "reater t5an t5e "radient of t5e
line for t5e #onstraint of materials (t5e line on <5i#5 t5e optimal point C falls)+ Ef t5e
"radient of t5e ob9e#ti*e fun#tion line <ere equal to t5e "radient of t5e line for t5e
materials #onstraint% t5e optimal solution <ould be an> point on FC+ ,5e "radient for
t5e materials #onstraint line is ?1+ Ef t5e "radient for t5e ob9e#ti*e fun#tion line <ere
less t5an ?1% t5e optimal solution <ould #5an"e from point C to point F+ ,5e "radient
of t5e line for t5e #urrent ob9e#ti*e fun#tion of .0C 6 &0D <ill be "reater t5an ?1 as
lon" as t5e #ontribution from DM is less t5an $.0+ Ef t5e #ontribution from DM is $.0
or more% t5e optimum solution <ill #5an"e+ ,5erefore t5e ma(imum sellin" pri#e for
DM is $190 ($1'0 *ariable #ost 6 $.0 #ontribution)+
(#)
Ef platin" time #an be sold for $16 per 5our t5en an> 5our de*oted to CLs and DMs
loses $16 sales re*enue+ ,5e rele*ant #ost per platin" 5our is no< $16 opportunit>
#ost+ ,5e #ontributions used in t5e ob9e#ti*e fun#tion s5ould be #5an"ed to refle#t t5is
opportunit> #ost+ ,5e #ontribution s5ould be redu#ed b> $. (1 5our at $16 ? $12) for
CL and b> $8 (2 5ours at $16 ? $12) for DL+ ,5e re*ised ob9e#ti*e fun#tion is0
7 ) &6C 6 22D
(d)
,5e s#ar#e resour#es are materials and labour+ ,5is is be#ause t5ese t<o #onstraints
interse#t at t5e optimal point C+ Platin" is not a s#ar#e resour#e% and t5e s5ado< pri#e
is 8ero+
:8;'
Ef <e obtain an additional unit of materials t5e re*ised #onstraints <ill be0
.C 6 .D ) 121 (materials)
.C 6 2D ) 100 (labour)
,5e *alues of C and D <5en t5e abo*e equations are sol*ed at 10+' for D and 19+1'
for C+ ,5erefore DM is in#reased b> 0+' units and CL is redu#ed b> 0+2' units and t5e
#5an"e in #ontribution <ill be as follo<s0
$
En#rease in #ontribution of DM (0+' ( $&0) 1'
3e#rease in #ontribution of CL (0+2' ( $.0) 10
En#rease in #ontribution (s5ado< pri#e) '
Ef <e obtain one additional labour 5our% t5e re*ised #onstraints <ill be0
.C 6 .D ) 120(materials)
.C 6 2D ) 101 (labour)
,5e *alues of C and D <5en t5e abo*e equations are sol*ed are 9+' for D and 20+' for
C+ ,5erefore CL is in#reased b> 0+' units and DM is redu#ed b> 0+' units% and t5e
#5an"e in #ontribution <ill be as follo<s0
$
En#rease in #ontribution of CL (0+' ( $.0) 20
3e#rease in #ontribution of DM (0+' ( $&0) 1'
En#rease in #ontribution (s5ado< pri#e) '
,5e rele*ant #ost of resour#es used in produ#in" 7G #onsists of t5e a#quisition #ost
plus t5e s5ado< pri#e (opportunit> #ost)+ ,5e rele*ant #ost #al#ulation is0
$
Material : @' !" at ($10 6 $')B 1'
Labour @' 5ours at ($8 6 $') 6'
Platin" (1 5our at $12) 12
4t5er *ariable #osts 90
2.2
:8;6
,5e sellin" pri#e is less t5an t5e rele*ant #ost+ ,5erefore produ#t 7G is not a
profitable addition to t5e produ#t ran"e+
(e)
,5e s5ado< pri#e of labour is $' per 5our+ ,5erefore t5e #ompan> s5ould be prepared
to pa> up to $' in e(#ess of t5e #urrent rate of $8 in order to remo*e t5e #onstraint+ :n
o*ertime pa>ment in*ol*es an e(tra $. per 5our% and t5erefore o*ertime <or!in" is
<ort5<5ile+
En#reasin" dire#t labour 5ours <ill result in t5e labour #onstraint s5iftin" to t5e ri"5t+
Ho<e*er% <5en t5e labour #onstraint line rea#5es point I% furt5er in#reases in labour
<ill not enable output to be e(panded (t5is is be#ause ot5er #onstraints <ill be
bindin")+ ,5e ne< optimal produ#t mi( <ill be at point I% <it5 an output of &0 units
of CL and 8ero of DM+ ,5is produ#t mi( requires 120 5ours (&0 ( . 5rs)+ ,5erefore
120 labour 5ours <ill be <or!ed ea#5 <ee!+ Gote t5at profit <ill in#rease b> $20 @20
( ($' ? $.)B+
Answer 3
(a)
"efine #aria$%es
Let ( ) t5e number of C produ#ed
Let > ) t5e number of D produ#ed
&sta$%ish o$'e(ti#e f)n(tion
,5e ob9e#ti*e is to minimi8e total produ#tion #ost (C)+ ,5e produ#tion #ost of C )
$100 and t5e produ#tion #ost of D ) $80 ("i*en in t5e question)+ ,5e ob9e#ti*e is to0
Minimi8e C ) 100( 6 80>
&sta$%ish (onstraints
(i) ( 6 > J 100 (minimum produ#tion requirement)
(ii) > K 2( (produ#tion ratio #onstraint)
(iii) ( K 2> (produ#tion ratio #onstraint)
(i*) &( 6 2> K .20 (platin" resour#es #onstraint)
(*) .( 6 8> K 800 (#ir#uitr> resour#es #onstraint)
(*i) ($& 6 2>$1' K &. (or 20( 6 8> K &. A 60) (assembl> resour#es #onstraint)
:8;1
*raph the pro$%em
For ea#5 of t5e #onstraint equations% turn t5e inequalit> si"n into an equals si"n% set (
and t5en > equal to 0 and sol*e t5e resultin" equations to find t5e points at <5i#5 t5e
#onstraints #ross t5e a(es+
Iquation (i)
( 0 100
> 100 0
Iquation (ii)
( 0 '0
> 0 100
Iquation (iii)
( 0 200
> 0 100
Iquation (i*)
( 0 1.0
> 210 0
Iquation (*)
( 0 200
> 100 0
Iquation (*i)
( 0 102
> 2'' 0
:8;8
"efine feasi$%e area
Label t5e feasible area on t5e "rap5+ Et "i*es a feasible area of :FC3I+
"etermine optiona% so%)tion
C ) 100( 6 80>
8%000 ) 100( 6 80> (sa>)
( 0 80
> 100 0
,5e ob9e#ti*e is to minimi8e #osts+ Ef <e put a ruler on t5e ob9e#ti*e fun#tion on t5e
"rap5 and slide it a#ross t5e pa"e% t5e first point of t5e feasible area it en#ounters (i+e+
as #lose to t5e ori"in as possible) is t5e optimal solution+ ,5is #an be seen to be point
F% t5e interse#tion of #onstraints (i) and (ii)+
:t F0
( 6 > ) 100 (1)
> ) 2( (2)
-ub (2) into (1)%
( 62( ) 100%
&( ) 100
( ) && 1$&
:8;9
> ) 66 2$&
Answer 4
(a)
(b)
:8;10
:8;11
(#)
(d)
:8;12
:8;1&

You might also like