Web Portal
Web Portal
DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY
from
by
THARITPONG FUANGVUT
B.BA (Business Computer),
M.Com (Business Information Systems)
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
2005
CERTIFICATION
Tharitpong Fuangvut
30 August 2005
II
ABSTRACT
A Campus Portal is an exciting recent phenomenon forming part of the new generation
of online services for all stakeholders in institutions of higher education. Conceptually
the general notion of a Portal should be to be distinguished from that of other Web-
based applications and the traditional Intranet of the institution. The literature review in
Phase One of this research indicates that the major distinguishing characteristics of a
Campus Portal are: (i) personalisation, by which end-users are only able to access
information and online services pertinent to their activities, and (ii) customisation, by
which end-users are able to select their preferred information channels and optional
online services.
The preliminary study explored and investigated the online services and Campus
Portals of 40 higher education institutions’ sites in Australia, New Zealand, the USA,
the UK and Canada. The findings of the preliminary study show that there are no
standard patterns in the function of personalisation and customisation in Campus
Portals. A set of research questions were then put forward to drive further investigation
into design and implementation issues regarding the personalisation and customisation
functions of Campus Portals.
III
The case study was conducted in an Australian university among the major stakeholder
groups, namely, the development team and the end-users (students and academic staff).
For the study of the development team, interviews were used to gather information on
their current practices and their vision for the future direction of the Campus Portal.
Students were the primary focus of the end-user study, from whom data was collected
using a survey to build up usage patterns of their online activities. In addition, a group
of academic staff were interviewed to obtain data from their perspective to identify and
clarify some important issues. The results and findings in this phase of the research
contribution to the body of knowledge on Campus Portals and their development.
In the final phase of the research, the review of existing development methodologies
was continued filtering them through a set of identified criteria based on the findings of
the two studies. Finally, the most appropriate development methodology was selected
and modified in order to support the requirements identified in this research as critical
for the development of a Campus Portal. The result was proposed as a Campus Portal
Development Methodology (CPDM) fulfilling the main objective of the research.
IV
PUBLICATION FROM THE RESEARCH
V
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This thesis has been made possible by the generous contributions from both people and
groups whom I wish to acknowledge and for whose assistance I am indebted. Without
their supports, this thesis will never be completed.
I would also sincerely thank to Professor Joan Pierson, a visiting Professor on the
Information Systems discipline at the University of Wollongong, for advice on the
questionnaire design which was provided me with an extremely useful feedback.
Additionally, I would express my appreciation and thank to Professor Graham Winley,
former Head of Department of Information Systems, for his initial guidance on my PhD
topic when I was in Thailand.
I would also sincerely thank to Professor Boonserm Weesakul, the former president of
the DPU, and Associate Professor Varakorn Samakoses, the president of the DPU for
their kindly supportive on my studying. Additionally, I would like to thank Associate
Professor Tatree Nonthasak, the Director of the International Networking Division of
the DPU, and his team for their supportive during my study in Australia. I would also
thank to Associate Professor Nucharee Premchaisawat, the Dean of the Faculty of
Information Technology, for her guidance and supportive on my study.
Most importantly, my family, I would like to thank my wife, Palita, and my son, Salute,
who supported me throughout the thesis and whose always love, patience, and
confident in me. Additionally, I would deeply express gratitude to my parents,
Suwannapoom and Sumalee, who provided a fully supportive and taking care since the
VI
first day of my life. I would also express my appreciation and thank to my parents in
law, Prakit and Punnee Kongsak, who always trusted in me since we have met. Also, I
would like to thank my brother, Kornkit, and my sister in law, Achiraya Kongsak, who
always kindly taking care of me.
Unforgettably, I would like thank to Grant, Sharon and Jared Stuart, and also Margaret
and Victor Ossington for their thoughtfulness and friendship. I will always remember
all of you.
Finally, I would like to thank all the participants who kindly took part in this research
for their valuable time, cooperation and assistance.
VII
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CERTIFICATION ...................................................................................................................................II
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................... VI
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................1
1.4.1 The Nature of Information Systems and System Development Research ..................................7
1.4.3.4 Phase Four: the Composition of the Development Methodology for the Campus Portal ................ 17
VIII
2.3.2 Perspective on Data Management ..........................................................................................28
2.6.6 Categorisation.........................................................................................................................38
IX
2.7 GENERATIONS OF CAMPUS PORTALS ...............................................................................................39
X
3.4.5.1 Traditional System Development Life Cycle (SDLC)..................................................................... 64
3.4.5.5 Effective Technical and Human Implementation of Computer-based Systems (ETHICS) ............. 69
3.4.5.6 Multiview........................................................................................................................................ 71
XI
4.4 RESEARCH APPROACH AND DESIGN ................................................................................................99
XII
5.6.2.1 Interviews...................................................................................................................................... 127
5.8.1 Reliability..............................................................................................................................140
5.8.2 Validity..................................................................................................................................140
6.2 HISTORY OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE CAMPUS PORTAL AND ONLINE SERVICES ......................143
6.3 PHILOSOPHY BEHIND THE CAMPUS PORTAL AND ONLINE SERVICES DEVELOPMENT ....................145
6.5 DEVELOPMENT PROCESS OF THE CAMPUS PORTAL AND ONLINE SERVICES ..................................148
6.8 CURRENT STAGES OF THE ONLINE SERVICES AND SUPPORTING INFRASTRUCTURES .....................152
6.9 PROBLEMS AND LIMITATIONS OF THE CAMPUS PORTAL AND ONLINE SERVICES DEVELOPMENT ..154
6.10 VISION ON THE FUTURE CAMPUS PORTAL AND ONLINE SERVICES DEVELOPMENT .....................155
XIII
7.2.4 Current Year of Study and Enrolled Faculty ........................................................................165
7.4.2.4 Using Online Communication Tools for Discussion with Classmates and Academic staff .......... 204
XIV
7.4.2.6 Taking Quizzes and Exams ........................................................................................................... 206
XV
CHAPTER 9 A DEVELOPMENT METHODOLOGY FOR CAMPUS PORTALS......................245
9.5 THE NEED FOR A COMPREHENSIVE METHODOLOGY FOR CAMPUS PORTAL DEVELOPMENT ..........250
10.2.2 An In-Depth Case Study of Campus Portal Developers and End-Users’ Online Activities 273
XVI
10.4 LIMITATIONS OF THE RESEARCH ..................................................................................................278
REFERENCES ......................................................................................................................................281
APPENDIX B QUESTIONNAIRE......................................................................................................324
XVII
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 2-1 GENERATION OF PORTAL (ECKERSON 1999B IN STEIN AND HAWKING 2005 P.173) .................40
TABLE 2-2 EXTENDED VERSION PORTAL GENERATION BY DIAS (2001 P.277) ............................................41
TABLE 2-3 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CORPORATE PORTAL (COLLINS 2001 P.53) .....................................41
TABLE 2-4 SDSU PORTAL: BENEFITS FOR STAKEHOLDERS (FRAZEE, FRAZEE AND SHARPE 2003 P.137)43
TABLE 3-1 COMPUTER SYSTEM VS. ISDM PERSPECTIVE, ADAPTED FROM UNOLD (2002) .........................62
TABLE 3-2 TWO BROAD TRADITIONS VERSIONS OF WHICH UNDERPIN MUCH IS WORK ...............................68
TABLE 3-3 CATEGORIES OF WEB APPLICATIONS (GINIGE AND MURUGESAN 2001B P.14)..........................81
TABLE 4-4 CROSS TABULATION BETWEEN TYPE OF PORTAL AND ANY TRACE OF PORTAL ......................111
TABLE 4-7 CROSS TABULATION BETWEEN TYPE OF CAMPUS PORTAL AND GROUPS OF STAKEHOLDER ...114
TABLE 4-8 CROSS TABULATION BETWEEN IMPLEMENTED LEVEL OF UNIQUE FUNCTIONS AND TYPE OF
PORTAL ...........................................................................................................................................117
TABLE 7-1 CROSS TABULATION BETWEEN GENDER AND STUDENT CATEGORY .......................................162
TABLE 7-2 CROSS TABULATION BETWEEN STUDENT CATEGORY AND AGE RANGE ..................................163
TABLE 7-3 CROSS TABULATION BETWEEN EDUCATIONAL LEVEL AND AGE RANGE OF STUDENTS ...........163
TABLE 7-4 CROSS TABULATION BETWEEN STUDENT CATEGORY AND EDUCATIONAL LEVEL ..................164
TABLE 7-5 CROSS TABULATION BETWEEN EDUCATIONAL LEVEL AND YEAR OF STUDY ..........................165
TABLE 7-6 CROSS TABULATION BETWEEN GENDER AND YEAR OF EXPERIENCE ......................................166
TABLE 7-7 CROSS TABULATION BETWEEN STUDENT CATEGORY AND YEAR OF EXPERIENCE ..................166
TABLE 7-8 CROSS TABULATION BETWEEN EDUCATIONAL LEVEL AND YEAR OF EXPERIENCE .................167
XVIII
TABLE 7-11 LOAN INFORMATION (SOURCE: THE CASE’S LIBRARY HOME PAGE).......................................211
TABLE 8-1 A SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE BASED ON ONLINE ACTIVITIES FOR GENERAL PURPOSES .............223
TABLE 8-2 A SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE BASED ON ONLINE ACTIVITIES FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES ...........225
TABLE 8-3 A SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE BASED ON ONLINE ACTIVITIES FOR ADMINISTRATIVE PURPOSES .226
TABLE 9-1 ADAPTED FROM AVISON AND FITZGERALD (2003A P.568) .....................................................261
TABLE A-12 TO VIEW MARKS AND GRADES FOR EACH SUBJECTS .............................................................316
TABLE A-20 TO USE EMAIL TO CONTACT CLASSMATES, TUTORS, AND LECTURERS ..................................320
XIX
TABLE A-25 TO VIEW FINANCIAL ISSUES .................................................................................................323
XX
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 1-2 A SPIRAL PROCESS TOWARDS UNDERSTANDING FOR BUILDING A CAMPUS PORTAL
DEVELOPMENT METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................................14
FIGURE 2-3 CORPORATE PORTAL MARKET SEGMENT (COLLINS 2001, COLLINS 2003) ...............................30
FIGURE 2-9 ENTERPRISE INFORMATION PORTAL (SHILAKES AND TYLMAN 1998 P.8)................................45
FIGURE 3-3 DIFFERENT SPECIALTIES WITHIN WEB SITE DESIGN (NEWMAN AND LANDAY 2000 ) ...............77
FIGURE 8-4 THE CHANGE IN CUSTOMERS AS A TECHNOLOGY MATURES, (NORMAN 1998 P.33)................241
XXI