Sitti Al 2001
Sitti Al 2001
Introduction
beam theory is well established [8]. Characteristic parameters based on this theory were formulated [13]. Utilizing unimorphs in flapping mechanisms, Cox et al. [7]
developed four-bar and five-bar flexure mechanisms integrated with unimorph actuators for stroke motions upto
30 50o .
Taking the microaerial flapping mechanisms as the target application in this paper, design issues, selection of
the proper actuator, and its fabrication and characterization are investigated. PZT-5H and a recently developed
PZN-PT single crystal material [14] are investigated as
the piezoelectric layers. PZT-5H is a widely used soft
piezoelectric ceramic. Strain levels as high as 1.7% can
be achieved in PZN-PT depending on composition, orientation and the applied electric field. Miniature actuators
are fabricated and characterized to evaluate their performance for flapping actuation.
Unimorph Actuators
+
p
e
i e
l a
o
t i c
l e
l a
c
y
t r i c
e
l a
p
s
2.1
For a free deflecting unimorph actuator, DC (low frequency) tip displacement dc , blocking force Fb , resonant
3l2 AB(B + 1)
d31 V
h2p
D
Fb
fr
Qa
Km
2.2
3whp AB(B + 1)
d31 V
4sp l AB + 1
s
i
2i hp Ep h
D
2
4l
3p (BC + 1)(AB + 1)
fr
fr1 fr2
wh3p
Fb
D
=
3
dc
4sp l AB + 1
(1)
PZT-5H
61
7500
320 1012
0.44
3800
1.5 106
PZN-PT
15
8000
950 1012
0.5
5000
10 106
steel
193
7872
For the design considerations, above equtions are converted to the rotational motion of the actuator for simplicity. Assuming the actuator tip deflection is small,
actuator rotation angle dc , output torque a , and rotational stiffness Ka are given as follows:
dc
a
Ka
dc
3l AB(B + 1)
= 2
d31 V
l
hp
D
= Fb l =
3whp AB(B + 1)
d31 V
4sp AB + 1
= Km l 2 =
wh3p
D
.
4sp l AB + 1
(2)
:1
a
J w
Ka
In our proposed flapping mechanism, a four-bar mechanism is coupled with the unimorph actuator for the
stroke amplification [6], [3]. Assuming there is a wing
as a load with inertia Jw and damping Bw , and a fourbar based transmission mechanism with stiffness Kt and
stroke amplification (transmission ratio) T , a linear approximate dynamic modeling of Figure 4 gives:
K
a
a
+
K
(3)
Jw + Bw +
=
t
T2
T
where is the flapping stroke angle, and Ka is the actuator rotational stiffness. Here, the actuator damping Ba
and inertia Ja are assumed to be negligible with respect
to the load damping and inertia.
3.1
For a given load power requirement, the actuator dimensions are to be chosen for ease of mechanical drive, fabrication, and drive voltage requirements. Considering a micromechanical insect modelled after a blowfly, with mass
m = 0.1 g, wing beat of = 2150 rad/s, and wing
stroke amplitude r = 70 at resonance, the net wing lift
force must match the insect weight of 103 N . Although
in the quasi-steady state lift and drag forces are generally proportional to the square of velocity, we choose a
linear damper with a force at peak wing velocity equals
to the weight of the micromechanical flying insect (MFI)
as an upper bound. (Note that the linear damper overestimates the damping force for all wing velocities less than
the peak velocity). Hence the wing damping Bw (at the
wing hinge) can be estimated from:
mglw
Bw =
(4)
r
where m = 0.1 g, g = 9.81 m/s2 , lw is the length of the
wing center of pressure, and is the wing beat frequency.
For lw = 10 mm, Bw = 8.65 109 N sm.
The Q of a resonant system is defined as the ratio
of stored energy to energy dissipated per radian. With
proper actuator and transmission design, energy dissipation for the MFI is work done on moving air, i.e. useful work. A high Q hence implies large internal stored
=T
=
2K1 r
dc K1 T
=
T Qw
T
2r
dc
=
T
T Qw
(8)
h2p D
dc
3d31 AB(B + 1)V
4sp
AB + 1
a
3d31 hp V AB(B + 1)
(9)
The average power at the wing is also another important parameter for the design which can be computed
from
a2 Bw
(mglw )2 Bw
Pw =
=
(10)
8T 2 (Bw + Ba /T 2 )2
2(Bw + Ba /T 2)2
where Ba = Ka /(Qa ), Qa = 20 and Ka = T 2 (K1 Kt ).
Furthermore, the mass of the actuator ma is limited for
enabling a total flying robot mass of m = 0.1 g. Therefore, ma = (p hp + s hs )lw should be also checked.
On the other hand, the thickness ratio of PZT and
elastic layers is important to select for maximum displacement and force. For a given hp = 127 m, the effect
of changing hs on the normalized values of dc , Fb and
fr are shown in Figure 5. In the figure, depending on
the design criteria, hs could be selected to maximize dc
(hs = 35 m case), or maximize Fb (hs is as large as
possible case). In our case, since both dc and Fb are
to be maximized, the following relation is used [13] for
choosing hs :
r
ss
hp
(11)
hs =
sp
In the figure, this corresponds to hs = 76 m (dashed
line). Morever, following constraints exist for hs selection:
switching stage to the wing load which is simply modeled as a linear system with inertia (Lwing ) and damping (Rdamp ) (although this is a crude approximation it
will not affect what will follow). In the figure, Cstif f
represents the piezoelectric mechanical stiffness. For a
PZT unimorph with parameters as in Table 1, N = T ,
Rloss = 12 M , Cl = 12 nF , Tpzt = 6.75 104 ,
Cstif f = 1/Km = 0.0065 F , Rdamp = 6(Tpzt /T )2 M ,
2
and Lwing = 1/(T 2 2 Cstif
f ) for a given T .
1
0.9
Blocking Force
(x90 mN)
Normalized Values
0.8
0.7
Deflection
(x200 um)
0.6
Resonant
Frequency
(x1182 Hz)
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
225
250
Figure 5: The effect of elastic layer thickness hs on normalized values of the deflection dc , the blocking force Fb ,
and the resonant frequency fr for a PZT-5H unimorph with
hp = 127 m and steel elastic layer.
The resonant frequency of the actuator fr should be
around ten times larger than the desired wing beat
frequency of 150 Hz in order to have a nonsignificant
actuator damping at resonance, and enabling square
wave driving for minimum power loss.
Applied voltage is increased for a thicker actuator.
During fabrication, polishing ceramic is troublesome. Therefore very thin layers are not desirable.
Using the above specifications, the MFI piezo parameters are computed as given in Table 2. Here, Jw = 2.26
1011 kgm2 , Bw = 8.65 109 N sm, = 2150 rad/s,
r = 70 , Qw = 2.5, and Kt = 5.3 106 N m/rad are
taken. Considering the available piezoelectric plates we
have, V = 150 V and hp = 127 m, and V = 250 V
and hp = 136 m are fixed for the PZT-5H and PZNTPT layers respectively. For these values, Pw = 4.7 mW .
Then, for given T and hs , l, w, Fb , dc , Pw , fr and ma
values are computed. From the values, it can be seen that
16 3 0.21 mm2 size PZT-5H and 5 1.3 0.22 mm2
size PZN-PT would enable the desired 140 wing flapping
at 150 Hz with relatively low masses. For PZT-5H unimorph to fly, V should be increased to 250 V , lowering
actuator mass to 26 mg per wing.
T
type
PZT
PZN-PT
PZT
PZN-PT
44
36
39
28
hs
(m)
76
76
50
50
lw
(mm2 )
16 2.9
5 1.4
16 3.6
5 1.3
Fb
(mN)
54
142
49
109
dc
(m)
354
135
393
176
fr
(Hz)
464
3032
406
2548
ma
(mg)
74
12
78
10
4
4.1
differential equation. Since we are operating at low frequencies (even 10 times lower than the first mode of the
actuator) the following aproximations can be used:
N = T is constant (this is valid even at frequencies
higher than the first mode),
Z1 is a linear capacitor (the parasitic capacitance of
piezoelectric materials),
Z2 is a RLC series impedance where R (resistor) represents damping, L (inductor) represents equivalent
mass of the actuator, and C (capacitor) is related to
the mechanical stiffness.
In Figure 6, the elements related to the PZT actuator
are almost the same as the circuit in Figure 7. The difference is that, at the electrical port of the piezoelectric
actuator two elements have been added: a resistor Rloss
to deal with DC leakage at high fields and a nonlinear
capacitor responsible for the hysteretic behavior. In [4]
it has been pointed out experimentally why such hysteresis is rate independent (described by a capacitor whose
voltage-charge relation is a nonlinear hysteretic function
independent of frequency), and how to practically model
it.
4.2
Applying a square wave to this RLC circuit, and behavior is observed as given in Figure 9. Although we are
in the linear case, waveforms are distorted sinusoids. In
the linear case, the output can be thought as a square
wave filtered by the second order system. The filter is
a resonant one, and Lwing and N 2 Cstif f are designed to
resonate at 150 Hz . The outputs most relevant harmonic is the first (a sine at 150Hz, tuned with the resonant frequency of the filter) while the others will be attenuated. Therefore, higher harmonics are present with
a small amount of energy, and their contribution leads
to a distorted sine. By choosing a square wave with a
different duty cycle, it is possible to have an input with
different energy distributions among harmonics so that
can be reshaped.
Figure 8: (a) Thevenins theorem for linear networks is applied to the part of network on the left of the dashed line
and so it is independent on the load whether it is linear or
not. b) After applying Thevenins theorem, only the capacitor is left since PZT damping and equivalent mass (resistor
and inductor) are negligible compared to the load damping
and inertia.
Actuator Characterization
During the experiments, unipolar input voltages are applied to diminish hysteresis and depolarization problems.
Figure 11: Optical detection setup with the laser and photodiode detector for actuator deflection measurements.
Figure 10: (a) LC oscillating circuit when current is positive; (b) inductor current and capacitor voltage vs. time; (c)
implemented circuit; and (d) acquired waveforms from circuit.
The unimorph tip deflection is measured using an optical
detection system as shown in Figure 11. In this setup,
a horizontal helium neon laser beam is focused onto a
perpendicular 1-D photo diode array (SL5-2, UDT Sensors Inc.). Then, the unimorph tip is positioned in between so that the tip motion is measured by the motion of its shadow on the sensor. A dynamic signal analyzer (HP-3562A) is utilized for frequency response characteristic measurements. For quasi-static measurements
a PC-based real-time (10 15 KHz) ADC and DAC
board (MultiQ data acquisition board, Quanser Consulting Inc.) is used in a Simulink programming environment.
The blocking force is measured with a semiconductor
strain gauge (Entran Inc., ESB-020) glued on the base of
a rigid brass beam where the setup is shown in Figure 12.
The unimorph tip is contacted to the beam end, and the
perpendicular force at the beam is measured as F1 . The
actuator output force also bends the flexible brass beam
with 1 displacement, and this bending is measured by a
side view optical microscope. Thus, measuring the free
deflection dc previously, Fb is computed from
Fb =
F1
1 1 /dc
(13)
PZT-5H
PZN-PT
V
(V )
150
200
dc
(m)
408
96
t
dc
(m)
354
118
Fb
(mN )
51
41
Ft
b
(mN )
55
77
fr
(Hz)
395
2004
t
fr
(Hz)
463
2897
Q
21
41
Deflection (m)
1600
(a)
1200
2
800
400
0
320
340
360
380
400
420
440
460
480
440
460
480
Frequency (Hz)
Phase (degree)
0
50
2
100
150
200
320
340
360
380
400
420
Frequency (Hz)
the nonlinear behavior of the actuator where the piezoelectric layer stiffness is decreased by the increased field
[12]. This stiffness change is also observed for our unimorphs as displayed in Figure 16. The PZN-PT becomes
relatively more compliant at the increased electric field
with respect to the PZT-5H unimorph.
Conclusion
500
400
300
200
100
0
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
Figure 14: Mechanical hysteresis curves of the PZT-5H unimorph at quasi-static mode (1 Hz) for different voltages.
300
1
200
100
0
1940
1970
2000
2030
2060
2090
2120
2090
2120
Frequency (Hz)
Phase (degree)
(b)
Figure 13: Measured electrical hysteresis behavior of a 10
1 0.15 mm3 size PZT-5H unimorph.
Deflection (m)
400
80
120
2
160
1
200
240
1940
1970
2000
2030
2060
Frequency (Hz)
Figure 15: Shift in the resonant frequencies of the PZT (upper) and PZN-PT (lower) unimorphs depending on the applied voltage (1: V = 12 V , 2: V = 30 V ).
and their performances are tested. Nonlinear behavior of
the piezos are observed at high electric fields. A 1 d.o.f.
wing flapping mechanism is actuated by the PZT-5H unimorph with V = 85 V , and 180 stroke angle is achieved
at 95 Hz which shows the success of the unimorph design
(Figure 17).
In order to increase the displacement and output
torque performance of the unimorphs with smaller dimensions, prestressing could be a possible solution which
is future work. Moreover, switching-based low-loss driving electronics for the actuators will be fabricated as
an on-board module using microelectronics technologies.
Then, a compact and light weight microaerial robot actuation mechanism would become possible.
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by ONR MURI N00014-98-1-0671,
ONR DURIP N00014-99-1-0720 and DARPA. Authors would
like to thank to Robert Wood for creating the force measure-
600
PZT5H
PZNPT
500
400
300
200
100
0
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
References
[1] R. Fearing, K. Chiang, M. Dickinson, D. Pick, M. Sitti,
and J. Yan, Transmission mechanism for a micromechanical flying insect, in Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conf.
on Robotics and Automation, San Francisco, USA, Apr.
2000.
[2] E. Precht and S. Hall, Design of a high efficiency,
large stroke, electromechanical actuator, Smart Mater.
Struct., vol. 8, pp. 1330, 1999.
[3] J. Yan, R. Wood, S. Avadhanula, M. Sitti, and R. Fearing, Towards flapping wing control for a micromechanical flying insect, in Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conf. on
Robotics and Automation, Korea, 2001 (to appear).
[4] M. Goldfarb and N. Celanovic, Modelling piezoelectric
stack actuator for control of micromanipulation, IEEE
Control System Magazine, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 6979, 1997.
[5] Q. Wang, X. Du, B. Xu, and L. Cross, Theoretical analysis of the sensor effect of cantilever piezoelectric benders, J. of Aplied Physics, vol. 85, pp. 17021712, 1
Feb. 1999.
[6] M. Sitti, PZT actuated four-bar mechanism with two
flexible links for micromechanical flying insect thorax,
in Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Korea, 2001 (to appear).
[7] A. Cox, D. Monopoli, and M. Goldfarb, Development
of piezoelectrically actuated elastodynamic flapping microaerial devices, in ASME Adaptive Structures and
Material Systems, pp. 257262, 1999.
[8] J. Smits and W. Choi, The constituent equations of
piezoelectric heterogenous bimorphs, IEEE Tran. on
Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Freq. Control, vol. 38,
pp. 256270, May 1991.
[9] M. Weinberg, Working equations for piezoelectric actuators and sensors, Journal of Microelectromechanical
Systems, vol. 8, pp. 529533, Dec. 1999.