Inter-Vehicular Communication Using Packet Network Theory
Inter-Vehicular Communication Using Packet Network Theory
Department of Computer Engineering, Thakur College of Engineering and Technology, University of Mumbai, India
2
Professor & Dean (Academics), Thakur College of Engineering and Technology, University of Mumbai, India
Abstract
As a component of the intelligent transportation system and one of the concrete applications of mobile ad hoc networks, intervehicle communication has attracted research attention from both the academia and industry of, notably, US, EU, and Japan. The
most important feature of inter-vehicle communication is its ability to extend the horizon of drivers and on-board devices (e.g.,
radar or sensors) and, thus, to improve road traffic safety and efficiency. Such type of Driver assistance systems are meant to
support drivers with driving process in order to avoid traffic accidents, speed up the traffic and have a higher control over the
traffic in general. These systems use the capacity of the vehicles to communicate, not only between them but also with
infrastructures. All the information is collected and processed to offer useful services.
Wireless adhoc network protocols are widely used in this area which provides communication among vehicles and road side
equipment. The performance of communication depends on how better the routing takes place in the network and these routing
protocols we have already been analyzed and compared in the past, simulations and comparisons have almost always been done
considering random motions.
Since the application development is for Inter-Vehicular Communication and Decongestion of Vehicular Networks, it is necessary
to initially locate the car position from GPS co-ordinates, Using filtering techniques and localization algorithms its accuracy is
enhanced. The vehicular density in the lanes is then found out for all vehicles at a specific location based on location and then
congestion algorithms are applied to congested lanes to decongest them.
Keywords: Intelligent Transportation System, Localization, Inter Vehicular Communication, GPS, Wireless Adhoc
Networks, Routing Protocols
--------------------------------------------------------------------***-----------------------------------------------------------------1. INTRODUCTION
Recent studies show that about 60% of roadway accidents
could be avoided if the driver was warned just one half
second before the collision occurs. Actually, traffic
accidents have become the main cause of mortality, quite
above illnesses. Emerging technologies appears to provide
faster, safer and more reliable communication techniques.
Bring together, this communication can be used in order to
reduce collisions, as well as to support and improve the
quality of the traffic. There are different kinds of systems to
assist drivers in the roads.
Inter-vehicle communication (IVC), on one hand, is an
important component of the intelligent transportation system
(ITS) architecture. It enables a driver (or its vehicle) to
communicate with other drivers (or their vehicles) that
locate out of the range of line of sight (LOS) (or even out of
the radio range if a multihop network is built among several
vehicles). As a result, information gathered through IVC can
help improve the road traffic safety and efficiency. On the
other hand, moving vehicles equipped with communication
devices form exactly an instance of long envisioned mobile
ad hoc networks. Benefiting from the large capacities (in
terms of both space and power) of vehicles, the nodes of
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 03 Issue: 09 | Sep-2014, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
72
2. RELATED WORK
Comparison among different MANET routing protocols
based on different application is discussed in [1]. A review
of location area routing mechanism is proposed in [2].The
proposed scheme performs a review of different routing
protocols which can be used for Vehicle to Vehicle (V2V)
and Vehicle to Infrastructure (V2I) communication. It also
discussed the need of location area routing mechanism to get
the exact location of the cars through GPS and localization
techniques to avoid collision and control congestion.
Different methodologies for the design of tractable solutions
for complex distributed systems that require safety and
liveness guarantees are presented in [3]. Implementation of
cooperative intersection collision warning system that is not
limited by the requirement of line-of-sight and is also
capable of collision warning for other scenarios such as
frontal and rear-end is proposed in [4]. [5] Discussed
possible cause and type of crashes and the available
technology to avert or reduce crashes. The relevance and
importance of the collision avoidance systems with respect
to the existing conditions and advantages and disadvantages
of the collision avoidance systems are also discussed. The
fundamental technical challenges and business motivations
behind wireless position location systems are described, and
promising techniques for solving the practical position
location problem are treated in [6]. Cascaded Haar method
for upper body detection, front face detection and side
posture detection is explained in [7]. Survey of recent
advances in face detection is presented in [8]. [9] Presents a
family of probabilistic localization algorithms known as
Monte Carlo Localization (MCL). Hough transform to detect
lane boundaries with a parabolic model under a variety of
road pavement types, lane structures and weather conditions
is proposed in [10]. Implementation, evaluation and
comparison of selected optimal edge detectors and the
HOUGH transform algorithm towards automated geologic
feature mapping in a volcanic geotectonic environment is
presented in [11].
3. PROPOSED WORK
Proposed work presents Inter vehicular communicationApplication of wireless protocols where we will see InterVehicular Communication and Decongestion of Vehicular
Networks by using different algorithms.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 03 Issue: 09 | Sep-2014, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
73
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 03 Issue: 09 | Sep-2014, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
74
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 03 Issue: 09 | Sep-2014, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
75
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 03 Issue: 09 | Sep-2014, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
76
REFERENCES
[1]. Kiranveer Kaur, Surinderjit Kaur and Vikramjit Singh
(2014), a Comprehensive Performance Analysis of Proactive
and Reactive MANET Routing Protocols, International
Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and
Software Engineering February 2014, vol 4, page no 113120
[2]. Neha Ghaisas (2014), Location area routing mechanismreview, International Journal of Current Engineering and
Technology, Vol.4 No.3, pp.1549-1552.
[3]. H.Kowshik, D.Caveney, P.R. Kumar (2011), Provable
System-wide Safety in Intelligent Intersections, IEEE
transactions on VTC, vol.60, no. 3 pp. 804-818.
[4]. R. Miller, Q. Huang (2002), An Adaptive Peer-to-Peer
Collision Warning System, Vehicular Technology
Conference, 2002. VTC Spring 2002. IEEE 55th, Page(s):
317 - 321 vol.1.
[5]. Srinivasa Rao Veeramallu (2000), Collision Avoidance
Systems, Center for Transportation Research and
Education, 2000 MTC Transportation Scholars Conference,
Ames, Iowa, pp. 173-183.
[6]. Rappaport, T.S(1996), Position Location using Wireless
Communication on Highways of Future, IEEE
Communications Magazine, pp. 3341.
[7]. Wilson, Phillip Ian, John Fernandez (2006), Facial
feature detection using Haar classifiers, Journal of
Computing Sciences in Colleges, 21.4 (2006), pp. 127-133.
[8]. Zhang, Cha, Zhengyou Zhang (2010) , A survey of
recent advances in face detection, Tech. rep., Microsoft
Research, 2010.
[9]. S.Thrun, D.Fox, W.Burgard, F.Dellaert (2001), Robust
Monte-Carlo Localization for mobile robots, published in
Elsevier Journal, pp. 99-141.
[10]. Yu, Bin, Anil K. Jain (1997), Lane boundary detection
using a multiresolution hough transform, Image Processing,
1997. Proceedings., International Conference on. Vol. 2.
IEEE, 1997, pp. 748 751.
[11]. Argialas, D. P., O. D. Mavrantza (2004), Comparison
of edge detection and Hough transform techniques for the
extraction of geologic features, Proc. XXth ISPRS Congr. of
the Int. Soc. of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing pp. 1223.
[12]. A. Doucet (1998), On sequential simulation-based
methods for Bayesian filtering, Technical Report
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 03 Issue: 09 | Sep-2014, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
77
CUED/FINFENG/TR
310,
Cambridge
University,
Department of Engineering, Cambridge, pp. 1-26.
[13]. L.P. Kaelbling, A.R. Cassandra, J.A. Kurien (1996),
Acting under uncertainty: Discrete Bayesian models for
mobile-robot navigation, Proc. IEEE/RSJ International
Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS-96),
Osaka, Japan, pp. 963-972.
[14]. Nora Ayanian,Vijay Kumar (2010), Abstractions and
Controllers for Groups of Robots in Environments with
Obstacles, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and
Automation,pp. 3537-3542.
[15]. R. E. Kalman (1960), a New Approach to Linear
Filtering and Prediction Problems, Transactions of the
ASME - Journal of Basic Engineering, vol. 82, pp. 35-45.
Chausse, F (2005), Vehicle localization on a digital map
using particles filtering, Intelligent Vehicles Symposium,
2005. Proceeding,IEEE, pp. 243-248.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 03 Issue: 09 | Sep-2014, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
78