The Spectral Gamma Ray Log Chapter 12
The Spectral Gamma Ray Log Chapter 12
12.
12.1 Introduction
The spectral gamma ray log measures the natural gamma
radiation emanating from a formation split into
contributions from each of the major radio-isotopic
sources. Analysis of the sources of the natural gamma
radiation give us added information concerning the
composition and likely lithology of the formation.
The spectral gamma ray log is commonly given the
symbol SGR.
A typical spectral gamma ray tool is shown in Fig. 12.1.
12.2 Principles
It will be remembered that the amplitude of the output
from the gamma ray sensor is proportional to the energy
of the incident gamma ray. We can use this information
to measure the proportion of the total gamma radiation
coming from each of potassium-40, the uranium-radium
series, and the thorium series for a particular formation.
Figure 10.1 shows that the energy distributions from
each of the major contributors to the natural gamma
radiation from a formation are different. The labeled
peaks in Figure 10.1 are the energies that are dominant
(most gamma rays have this energy). When the radiation
has traveled through the rock and drilling fluid to the
sensor, the energy distributions shown in Figure 10.1 are
added together because the rock contains different
amounts of each of radio-isotopes. The energy
distributions are also spread out in energy space as the
result of compton scattering. However, the energy peaks
from each of the major contributors to the gamma
radiation are still recognizable (Fig. 12.2).
Page 111
Counts
The spectral gamma ray tool uses the same sensor as the total gamma ray tool. The output from the
sensor is fed into a multi-channel analyzer that calculates the amount of radiation coming from the
energies associated with each of the major peaks. This is done by measuring the gamma ray count rate
for 3 energy windows centred around the energies 1.46 MeV for potassium-40, 1.76 MeV for the
uranium-radium series, and 2.62 MeV for the thorium series. These readings represent the gamma ray
radioactivity from each of these sources. Their sum should be the same as the total gamma ray value
measured by the total gamma ray tool, and is coded SGR if measured with a spectral gamma ray tool.
Any combination of the three components can be summed and analyzed. However, the most important
is the sum of the potassium-40 and thorium radiation, which is called the computed gamma ray
response (CGR).
K (1.46 MeV)
U (1.76 MeV)
Th (2.62 MeV)
1
3
2
Gamma Ray Energy, MeV
Figure 12.2 Measured gamma ray energy spectrum from a formation after compton scattering.
12.3 Calibration
The spectral gamma ray tool is calibrated using 4 sources of accurately known composition, one each
containing only K40, U238, and Th232, and one containing a mixture. Each of the sources is placed next
to the detector and the tool is used to make a measurement. The calibration is designed such that the
calibrated readings of the tool accurately report difference in the amount of radiation from each of the
radiation sources, and the total count rate is calibrated to the Houston test pit.
Page 112
Tracks 2 and 3 are used to record the calculated abundances associated with the radiation from the
individual contributions from each of K40, U238, and Th232. It should be noted that potassium is reported
as a percentage, while U238 and Th232 are reported in parts per million (ppm).
SGR (API)
0
100
CGR (API)
100
Depth (m)
K (%)
Th (ppm)
0
40 0
10
U (ppm)
40
1050
1055
Page 113
the eccentred version. Correction charts for the spectral gamma ray tools are also supplied by the
logging tool company for centred and eccentred configurations.
12.10.1
Determination of Lithology
12.10.1.1
It was seen in the discussion concerning the total gamma ray log that clean sands can sometimes
produce high gamma ray readings which would confuse them with shales. Such sandstones include
those containing feldspars, micas, glauconite, and heavy minerals including uranium-bearing ores.
The extra information supplied by the spectral gamma ray tool can, in most cases, help recognize these
situations, and calculate the amount of the particular radioactive minerals present.
Radioactive sandstones fall into one of six main groups, which are classified below, and may be
recognized using Figs. 12.4 and 12.5.
Clay-Bearing Sandstones. If clay minerals are known to be present in the rock, they may be
identified using Fig. 12.5.
Arkose sandstones. These contain feldspars, which have a significant potassium content, but a low
thorium content. The Th/K ratio will therefore be low (<1 ppm/%), as shown in Fig. 12.4.
Micaceous sandstones. These contain mica, which has a potassium composition that is less than
feldspars and a thorium content that is higher. The Th/K ratio is usually between 1.5 and 2.5 ppm/%.
Page 114
Graywackes. These contain both feldspars and micas, and give Th/K ratios intermediate between 1
and 2.5 ppm/%.
Greensands. These contain glauconite, which is a mica group mineral containing iron, magnesium
and potassium. It has Th/K ratios between 1 and 1.5 ppm/%.
Heavy mineral-bearing sandstones. The heavy minerals are often abundant in either U or Th or
both. The U and Th values are usually sufficiently high to ensure high U/K and Th/K ratios even if the
sandstones also contains potassium in the form of feldspars, micas or glauconite. Typically Th/K
values will be above 25 ppm/%, and U/K values will be above 20 ppm/%.
Figure 12.4 Thorium/potassium cross-plot for mineral identification using spectral gamma ray data.
K Feldspar
K Feldspar
Micas
Chemical Maturity
Increases
Glauconite
Muscovite
& Illite
Interstratified
Muscovite & Illite
Kaolinite
& Chlorite
Weathering
Increases
Clays
Bauxite
10
Th/K (ppm/%)
100
Figure 12.5 Thorium/potassium ratio plot for mineral identification using spectral gamma ray data.
Page 115
The fact that sands that do not contain clays are sometimes radioactive, as seen above, indicates that
there will be occasions when the shale volume calculated from the total gamma ray log (GR) or the
total gamma ray log from the spectral tool (SGR) will be misleading. However, we can calculate the
shale volume from the individual readings of the spectral gamma ray log (K, Th, and U), and from the
computed gamma ray log (CGR).
Vsh CGR =
CGR CGRmin
CGRmax CGRmin
K K min
Vsh K =
K max K min
Th Thmin
Vsh Th =
Thmax Thmin
Vsh U =
U U min
U max U min
(12.1)
(12.2)
(12.3)
(12.4)
Equations (12.1) to (12.3) are better shale indicators than Eq. (11.1), since the random contribution of
U is eliminated. Equation (12.4), is almost never used.
12.10.1.2
Carbonate Formations
In pure carbonates, thorium will usually be absent because the common thorium ions are insoluble,
and potassium will also be negligible. So we can say that, if the formation has very low Th and K
abundances, the rock may be a pure carbonate. The rock, however, may contain uranium. Uranium
usually indicates material of an organic origin as organisms are extremely good at concentrating and
storing uranium. Uranium ions are either soluble or insoluble depending upon their oxidation state.
Highly oxidized uranium ions, from oxidizing environments (such as deserts) are insoluble. Thus a
carbonate, which also has low U abundance, comes from an oxidizing (maybe desert) environment.
Conversely, non-oxidized uranium ions from sub-surface depositional environments are more soluble,
and hence can be present in carbonates.
It should be noted that oxidizing environments are not conducive to the conservation of organic
material, while reducing environments not only favour the conservation of organic material, they aid
the conversion of the organic material to hydrocarbons. The source organic material for hydrocarbons
in carbonate rocks is often algal mats that are incorporated in the deposited rocks in a sub-sea
(reducing) environment and contain a significant amount of uranium.
In clay-bearing carbonate rocks high total gamma readings are not related only to the clay fraction, but
are also due to the presence of uranium-radium series isotopes of organic origin. High total gamma ray
readings are therefore not a reliable indicator of the shaliness of a carbonate. However, if the spectral
gamma ray log indicates the presence of K and Th together with the U, it may be said that the K and
Th contributions are associated with the clay content of the shaly carbonate, while the U is associated
with some organic source which was deposited in a reducing environment that favours the
Page 116
conservation of organic material. Similarly, high K and Th values together with low U indicates a
shaly carbonate, deposited in an oxidizing environment which is not a favourable environment for the
conservation of organic material.
Note that K and Th must be present together for a clay to be indicated. The presence of K and no Th
(with or without U) is usually an indicator of the remains of algal mats in the carbonate, or of
glauconite. Thus, when calculating the shaliness of a carbonate, it is better to use the CGR (Eq. 12.1)
as in the case of sandstones in 12.10.1.1 above.
The actual values of K and Th in the shaly carbonate will depend upon the type of clay present, as
shown in Fig. 12.4.
Note that isolated intervals of any combination of high U, K and Th in carbonate rocks may
correspond to stylolites, which tend to concentrate uranium, organic matter, and clay minerals.
Table 12.1 shows the main interpretations of the spectral gamma ray data for carbonate rocks.
Table 12.1 Interpretation of spectral gamma ray data in carbonates.
K
Th
Low
Low
Low
Explanation
12.10.1.3
Evaporites
Large total gamma ray values are commonly associated with shales and certain types of potassiumbearing evaporite. We can discriminate between these because the potassium-bearing evaporites have
much larger potassium abundances and zero thorium resulting from the insolubility of thorium ions in
Page 117
water. Evaporites are deposited in oxidizing environments, so the uranium is usually also very low or
zero. Some K-bearing evaporites are shown in Table 12.2.
Table 12.2 Potassium-bearing evaporites.
Name
Composition
K
(wt%)
Density
[FDC]
(g/cm3)
Pe
[LFDC]
(b/e)
Porosity
[CNL]
(%)
T
[Sonic]
(
s/ft)
Sylvite
Langbeinite
Kainite
Glaserite
Carnalite
Polyhalite
KCl
K2SO4(MgSO4)2
MgSO4 KCl(H2O)2
(K Na)2SO4
KCl MgCl2(H2O)6
K2SO4 MgSO4 (CaSO4)2
(H2O)2
52.44
18.84
15.7
24.7
14.07
13.37
1.86
2.82
2.12
2.7
1.57
2.79
8.51
3.56
3.5
4.09
4.32
-3
-2
>60
>60
25
74
52
83
57.5
12.10.2
Unconformity Detection
The mean Th/K ratio of large intervals of formations is usually approximately constant. This is
because it depends ultimately upon the depositional conditions. Hence any sudden changes in the
mean Th/K ratio can act as an indicator of sudden change in depositional environment, such as at an
unconformity.
12.10.3
Inter-well Correlation
Volcanic ashes (bentonitic intervals) are considered to be deposited at exactly the same time over a
wide area. They can therefore be used to correlate between wells. Peaks in the thorium abundance log
are generally considered the best signature in this correlation.
12.10.4
The values of Th and U from the spectral gamma ray log are used together with the density from the
density log and the sonic wave travel time from the sonic log to identify and discriminate between
igneous rocks. Most igneous rocks show a Th/U ratio close to 4, as shown in Fig. 12.6. The exception
is syenite (Th/U=0.52). Note the progression from low values of both Th and U for ultramafic rocks to
higher values as the rocks become more acidic, but with constant Th/U.
12.10.5
Diagenesis
Diagenesis is studied using the Th/K ratio derived from spectral gamma ray logs.
Page 118
40
Granite
Granodiorite
Diorite
Ultramafic
Weathering
Effect
Th (ppm)
30
Syenite (Th=1300,
U=2500, Th/U=0.52)
20
10
10
U (ppm)
15
20
12.10.6
Sedimentology
The spectral gamma ray log provides a large amount of data that can help discriminate between
depositional environments and allow grain size and mineralogical composition to be constrained.
Some of the more important sedimentologically relevant data are shown in Table 12.3.
Table 12.3 Sedimentological inferences from spectral gamma ray data.
SGR Observation
Sedimentological Inference
Presence of glauconite
Phosphatic deposits
Uranium
Clay type
Bauxite
Feldspars
12.10.7
Direct measurement of the amount of uranium present in the rocks, and its variation.
Page 119
12.10.8
The cation exchange capacity of the rock may be calculated by knowing the type and quantity of clays
present in the rock from spectral gamma ray data.
12.10.9
Radioactive Scaling
Unusually raised U contents are frequently observed in the perforated intervals of old wells due to the
build-up of uranium salts.
12.10.10
Hydrocarbon Potential
Organic matter is good at concentrating uranium. If this is deposited in a reducing environment it can
be preserved and transformed to hydrocarbons. Hence, there is a correlation between the presence of
uranium and hydrocarbons. It is possible to evaluate the total organic carbon content of rocks from the
uranium content derived from the spectral gamma ray log providing the relationship is calibrated using
core data. The hydrocarbon potential of the rock may then be derived from the total organic carbon
content.
12.10.11
Fracture Detection
Uranium is soluble in reducing conditions. Dissolved uranium salts may then be precipitated along
fractures, causing local peaks in the uranium spectral gamma ray log. However, local uranium peaks
do not unambiguously indicate fractures, so their presence must be checked on image logs.
12.10.12
Stylolite Detection
Stylolites concentrate clay minerals, organic matter and uranium, and can be compacted into thin
bands which show up as thin peaks in the uranium spectral gamma ray log.
12.10.13
Phosphate Detection
Uranium is also associated with phosphates, which are encountered with evaporites.
Page 120