Topsides Pressure Integrity Management
Topsides Pressure Integrity Management
Prompt
Remarks
Comments /Status
1.1
Pressure Integrity
Management Policy
Does the operator have a
written Pressure Integrity
Management Policy?
If so, is it clearly defined,
communicated & put into
practice?
1.2
page 1/9
FACILITY INTEGRITY
TOPSIDES PRESSURE INTEGRITY MANAGEMENT
No
Prompt
codes & recommended
practices referenced? :
AS 3788,
API RP 572, 574, 576, 579
and 580 and API 510 and
570
Remarks
Comments /Status
2.1
2.2
Organisation
Have roles / responsibilities
for Pressure Integrity been
adequately defined including
the allocation for onshore &
offshore staff?
Asset Integrity Custodian
Is there asset Integrity
Custodian appointed?
Is there a documented
procedure for rerating of
pressure equipment?
page 2/9
FACILITY INTEGRITY
TOPSIDES PRESSURE INTEGRITY MANAGEMENT
No
Prompt
2.3
2.4
2.5
Remarks
Is there a documented
procedure for temporary
repair of pressure piping?
Code Compliance
Is there an established list of
codes and standards
covering all pressure
equipment including piping?
Comments /Status
Is there an approach
established due to updating
of international / national
codes & standards?
Operating Procedures
Are there adequate
operating procedures for
safe operation within the
design envelopes?
page 3/9
FACILITY INTEGRITY
TOPSIDES PRESSURE INTEGRITY MANAGEMENT
No
2.6
Prompt
Maintenance Procedures
Is there a flange bolt
torquing procedure for
pressure equipment
including piping?
Is there an inspection and
maintenance programme for
threaded connections in
pressure system?
Is there inspection
procedure or methodology /
inspection programme
against detecting corrosion
under lagging?
Remarks
Comments /Status
2.7
Offshore Implementation
Aspects for consideration during offshore
inspection include;
Is the Pressure Integrity
FMT team has an overview of system
management strategy
effectively enacted offshore? metallurgy and corrosion / cavitations /
fatigue and other degradation risks.
The objective of operation surveillances from
page 4/9
FACILITY INTEGRITY
TOPSIDES PRESSURE INTEGRITY MANAGEMENT
No
Prompt
Remarks
Comments /Status
3.1
Methodology
Does the operator have risk
base inspection
methodology covering
pressurised equipment and
piping system?
Are there performance
standards and a set of well
defined and measurable
KPIs established?
page 5/9
FACILITY INTEGRITY
TOPSIDES PRESSURE INTEGRITY MANAGEMENT
No
Prompt
3.2
3.3
3.4
Remarks
Comments /Status
page 6/9
FACILITY INTEGRITY
TOPSIDES PRESSURE INTEGRITY MANAGEMENT
No
Prompt
assurance of system
effectiveness?
Remarks
Comments /Status
4.1
Performance Monitoring
How is performance
monitored against
predetermined criteria?
4.2
page 7/9
FACILITY INTEGRITY
TOPSIDES PRESSURE INTEGRITY MANAGEMENT
No
Prompt
4.3
4.4
Remarks
Comments /Status
Legend:
- Complies
evidence
- Not Tesetd / No
elements missing)
INSPECTION CARRIED OUT BY
Name:
..................................................................................................................................................................
Signature: ......................................................................................
page 8/9
FACILITY INTEGRITY
TOPSIDES PRESSURE INTEGRITY MANAGEMENT
page 9/9