The Effect of Temperature Upon The Setting Behaviour of Refractory Calcium Aluminate Cements
The Effect of Temperature Upon The Setting Behaviour of Refractory Calcium Aluminate Cements
S.M.
Bushnell-Watson and J.H.
Sharp
Dept.
of Ceramics, Glasses and Polymers,
University of Sheffield, Northumberland Road,
Sheffield, SI0 2TZ, UK.
(Refereed)
Received July 30, 1986)
ABSTRACT
A
setting
time parameter
has
been
determined
from
the heat
evolution versus time curve measured by means of a the rmocouple
embedded in the cement paste as well as by the Gillmore needle.
The setting time increases with increasing temperature, until it
reaches a maximum between 26 and 30C, for four out of the five
refractory
calcium aluminate
cements
studied.
This anomalous
retardation
is not, therefore,
restricted
to ciment fondu, as
reported elsewhere.
The rate of consumption of CA during the first
24 hours of hydration as determined by X-ray diffraction also
indicated a retardation at 30C compared with 20oc for Secar 51 and
Secar 71o
The cause of the anomaly cannot be the presence of C2S ,
which is virtually absent in most of the cements studied.
An
alternative explanation must be found, which should also explain
why
Secar
80
behaves
differently
from
the
other
cements
investigated.
Introduction
The term high alumina cement covers a family of cements ranging from
40-80% alumina content (I-3).
The less alumina rich of these materials
contain several phases such as calcium silicate and calcium aluminoferrite in
addition to the pure calcium aluminateso
These are the more extensively used
high
alumina
cements
and
the
term
ciment
fondu
is often
used when
distinguishing
this class of materials
from the more refractory calcium
aluminate cements which are essentially members of the CaO-AI203 binary
system.
As the hydration temperature is increased, it has been reported (1,3-5) that
ciment fondu exhibits an anomalous setting behaviour in the region of 30C.
Thus Robson (i) states that, "In the range 18-30C the setting time of most
high alumina cements becomes slower as the temperature rises and only above
30oc does the rate of set accelerate again." Recently published data (4,5)
875
876
indicate that the retardation in the case of ciment fondu and other cements
containing C2S is substantial.
By contrast, the purer refractory cements
such as Secar 250 and Super Secar, did not show the same effect, but instead
the setting time decreased continuously as the temperature was raised.
From an X-ray diffraction investigation of the hydration of Secar 71 at 22 ,
30 and 40C (to be discussed later), evidence of an apparent retardation in
the rate of consumption of CA at 30C compared with that at 22oc was
observed.
This suggested to us that the setting behaviour of Secar 71 might
be more
similar to that reported
for ciment
fondu than for the more
refractory cements.
Hence we decided to carry out a thorough investigation
of the setting behaviour of commercial refractory calcium aluminate cements,
with alumina contents in the range 50-80%.
TABLE [
Chemical Analysis of Refractory Calcium Aluminate Cements
Secar 51
AI203
CaO
MgO
SiO 2
Fe203
Na20
FeO
Fe
TiO 2
50.4
36.6
0.l
6.7
1.9
0.1
[.0
0.15
2.15
Secar 71
7[.0
27.0
0.2
0.35
0.25
0.35
.
0.05
Alcoa CA-14
Alcoa CA-25
72
27
0.15
0.25
0.20
0.20
79.0
18.0
0.4
0.i
0.3
0.5
.
-
Secar 80
80.5
18.0
0.l
0.2
0.15
0.25
.
-
0.03
Experimental
(a) Materials
The
cements
examined
were
commercial
refractory
high
alumina
cements
manufactured by either Lafarge (the three Secar samples) or by Alcoa (CA-14
and CA-25).
Typical chemical analyses as supplied by these companies are
listed in Table [.
X-ray powder diffraction indicated the presence of CA,
CA2, CI2A 7 and unreacted alumina in all the samples except that Secar 51
contained no CA 2 but did contain C2AS.
An indication of the relative amounts
of the various phases detected in the cements is given in Table 2. It is not
possible to be more quantitative since small variations were observed from
one
batch
to another
(perhaps associated with different
particle
size
distributions of the various phases) and the X-ray procedure did not involve
the use of an internal standard.
There is, however, no doubt that the phases
reported are present, and that, for example, the CI2A 7 content of the CA-25
sample is appreciably higher than that of the Secar 80 sample.
(b) Methods
X-ray
diffraction
(XRD)
traces
were
obtained
using
a
diffractometer using Cu K - ~ radiation and a scanning rate
The hydrated samples examined by XRD were prepared by adding
water (lO or 15 ml.), already at the correct temperature,
Philips PW-1730
of 2 2e/minute.
boiled distilled
to cement powder
87~
SETTING TIP~, ANOMALY, RETARDATION, CA CEMENT
TABLE 2
Mineralogical Composition of Refractory Calcium Aluminate Cements
Secar 51
CA
CA 2
CI2A 7
A
C2S
C2AS
C4AF
+++
nd
+
+
tr
+
tr
Secar 71
Alcoa CA-14
+++
++
tr/+
+
nd
nd
nd
+++
+++
tr
+
nd
nd
nd
Alcoa CA-25
+++
+
+
++
nd
nd
nd
Secar 80
+++
++
tr
+++
nd
nd
nd
878
\,.
\\
TI
t.
FIG. I
Results
(a) XRD analysis of unreacted CA
As part of an investigation of the effect of temperature on the hydration of
refractory calcium aluminate cements, samples of Secar 71 were hydrated at
22 , 30 and 40oc with a w:c ratio of 0:5.
The XRD peak height for the
unreacted CA was observed to be greater after 7 hours hydration at 30C than
at 22C.
A similar observation was made in the case of Secar 51, but not in
the case of Secar 80 (Figure 2).
The effect was only seen during the initial
stages of hydration and beyond 2A hours the consumption of CA increased with
increasing temperature.
(b) Initial setting times determined by the Gillmore needle
The Gillmore needle was used to determine the initial setting time for each
of the three Secar cements and the results are shown in Figure 3.
These
results confirm the setting behaviour suggested by the XRD data.
Both Secar
51 and Secar 71 cements clearly exhibit a retardation in set at 30C, whilst
Secar 80 does not.
The retardation is very dramatic and in the case of Secar
51 the setting time is I0 hours longer at 30C than at 20C.
(c) Setting time parameter determined b~ the" embedded thermocouple method
Once again the three Secar cements were examined first and the results are
shown in Figure 4.
Many more determinations were made because of the more
convenient method of measurement.
Excellent reproducibility was obtained;
repeat determinations were made frequently, which never differed by more than
15 minutes and usually by no more than 5 minutes.
The results shown in Figure 4 provide further confirmation of the anomalous
setting retardation of Secar 51 and Secar 71 as the temperature is raised
from 10 to 30oc.
The behaviour of $ecar 80 is again different from that of
the other two cements.
The
plots
constructed
from
the
two
methods
of
determining
setting
time
879
SETTING TIME, ANOMALY,
RETARDATION,
CA CEMENT
4ooc~', \\\
Secar ? I
o
o
Secar 51
Secer eO
:/
40C
30oc~
2oc
"
Secar 7 1
qr
i'
24c
Secar 8 0
M
o
1~
~'s
7days
TU~
10
20
30
40
50
H y d r a t i o n T e m p e r a t u r e (oC)
FIG. 2
XRD peak height of
CA versus time (log scale).
FIG. 3
Initial setting time versus
temperature of hydration as
determined by the
Gillmore needle.
880
Secer
5 1
Secar
7 1
Secer 80
it
01
~"
e
u~
(O
ot
0
i
10
20
30
40
50
Hydration T e m p e r a t u r e (C)
l'hr
0.5hr
FIG. 4
FIG.
Setting time parameter versus
temperature of hydration as
determined by the embedded
thermocouple method.
881
SETTING T I ~ ,
ANOmaLY,
RETARDATION,
CA CLMENT
+4
AIoll C A 2 S
t~4
v,-
AIcoe
W:C
O.S
W:C
0,33
CA14
(D
0
lm
E
0
cn
~P
c~
L
\
r
t
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
10
20
30
40
i50
HydratlonTempermture(oC)
FIG. 6
FIG.
All the pastes used to obtain the data so far presented were prepared using a
w:c ratio of 0.5.
Since this is a higher value than that used in previous
studies, a further series of setting time parameters was determined for Secar
71 using a w:c ratio of 0.33.
The results are shown in Figure 7 and it can
be seen that they are closely similar to those obtained with a w:c ratio of
0.5.
The
anomalous
retardation
in setting
time
parameter
was again
observed.
Discussion
It is clearly established by means of the three different experimental
methods that a maximum setting time is observed between 26 and 30C for four
of the five refractory calcium aluminate cements investigated.
The anomalous
setting
behaviour
reported
by George
et
ai.(3-5)
is not,
therefore,
restricted to ciment fondu, but is the normal behaviour to be expected during
the hydration of high alumina cements.
The fifth cement studied, Secar 80,
shows a different setting behaviour, in that the setting time decreases with
882
883
SETTING TIME, ANOMALY, RETARDATION,
CA CEMENT
temperature ranges quoted above and concluded that the behaviour depends very
largely on nucleation phenomena which still remain poorly understood.
Our observation that beyond 16 hours the extent of hydration increases with
inceasing temperature leads us also to favour an explanation involving the
difficult nucleation of C2AH 8.
Other authors (6,10,11) have shown evidence
for a nucleation barrier to the formation of the hexagonal C-A-H products,
while Coffin and George(12) have suggested that the formation of sub-critical
embryos of CAHI0 hinders the development of critical embryos of C2AH 8.
In
the temperature range under consideration there is no doubt that the favoured
hydration products from pure CA and high alumina cements are C2AH8, alumina
gel and gibbsite, AH 3.
Conclusions
i.
A maximum setting time in the range 26-30C has been observed with Secar
51, Secar 71, Alcoa CA-14 and Alcoa CA-25.
This is similar to the
behaviour already reported by other workers for pure CA and ciment fondu
and is, therefore,
the behaviour
t o be expected for high alumina
cements.
2.
This maximum setting time was not observed for Secar 80.
Instead the
setting time decreased with increasing temperature especially between 15
and 25oc.
3.
4.
5.
6.
the
be associated
Acknowledgements
One of us (SMBW) wishes to thank I.C.I.
Agricultural Division and SERC for a
grant under the CASE scheme.
We are grateful to Lafarge Aluminous Cement
Co., and I.C.I.
for the supply of samples, and to Mr.
L.
Lord (I.C.I.),
Dr.
C.
Fentiman
(Lafarge), Dr.
P.F.G.
Banfill and Miss S.
Gill
(University of Liverpool) for helpful discussions.
References
I.
2.
K.M. Parker
(1982).
3.
and
Alumina
J.H.
Cements
Sharp,
Trans.
and
J.
and Performance
p.415 (1983).
Concretes,
Brit.
of
London
Ceram.
Cements",
Soc.
Ed.
Contractors
81,
P.
35-42
Barnes,
884
George,
4.
C.M.
5.
Trans.
and
D.D.
J.
Brit.
6.
S.A.
Double,
7.
8.
B. Guilhot and M.
p.97-Iii (1982).
9.
Soustelle,
II. P.
Barter
pp.112-124,
and D.
Bertrandie,
Turin ([982).
George,
Int.
Soc.,
Seminar
Concr.
82-90
on Calcium
Res.,
and A. Negro,
Seminar
79,
C.R.
on Calcium
14,
Acad.
D.
Int.
Bertrandie,
Int.
Cem.
Seminar
Seminar
on
Calcium
(1984).
Sci.,
Paris,
Aluminates,
Turin,
Concr.
on
(1980).
Aluminates,
73-82
D. M~n~trier
and C.M.
(1982).
Cem.
Int.
10. P. Barter,
(1974).
12. B. CottEn
pp.160-170
and
Ceram.
based on a
Engineers,
Res. ~,
Calcium
545-556
Aluminates,
Aluminates,
Turin,