Engineering Ethics
Engineering Ethics
Lecture 1
Morality and Ethics
Umar Faiz
Department of Computer & Information Sciences
Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences
The terms ethics and morality are often used interchangeably. However,
there is a distinction between them.
(c) What is good or bad about the people, policies, and ideals involved?
Goodness decency, kindness, honesty, integrity, righteousness
Ethics
Second-order, conscious reflection on the adequacy of our moral beliefs.
Gray Areas
Ethics
It defines how thing are according to the
rules.
Social system/External
Because society says it is the right thing to
do.
We may face peer/societal disapproval,
or even be fired from our job.
Amorality
Having no moral sense or being indifferent to right and wrong.
Immorality (Non-moral)
The immoral person knowingly violates human moral standards, the
amoral person may also violate moral standards because he or she has
no moral sense.
Examples:
Is Killing Immoral?
Is downloading copyrighted material off a web site immoral?
Is misrepresenting someone else immoral?
Is undercutting someone else work immoral?
Branches of Ethics
Descriptive Ethics
It involves describing, characterizing and studying morality
What is
Normative Ethics
It involves supplying and justifying moral systems
What should be
Applied Ethics
How moral outcomes can be achieved in specific situations.
Instrumental Values
These are values that can be used to get something else.
Example:
Freedom (Through which we can get dignity and/or self actualization)
Knowledge (which helps us to get economic prosperity, and progress).
10
Prerequisite Values
These are values that are necessary before you can get to some bigger
goal.
Example: Justice (which is needed before we can move onto equality).
11
Operative Values
These types of values are the ways that we make judgments on how to
live the rest of our lives and tell us what is always right and wrong.
Examples: Integrity, Honesty, and Loyalty.
12
Customs/
Beliefs
The Individual
Regions of
Country
Profession
Conscience
Employer
Religion
Society at
Large
13
Religion
Science
Culture
Law
14
Science
Sciences main objective is to prove certain facts, phenomenons and other
things right or wrong.
For example, it is scientifically proven smoking is injurious to
health. Thus, science helps us realize that there are better ways to live
and thrive in our environment.
15
Laws
Laws are rules of conduct, approved by legislatures that guide human
behavior in any society. They codify ethical expectations & keep changing
when new evils emerge. But laws cannot cover all ethical expectations of
society.
For example, law forbids stealing.
16
Statutes
Regulations
Common law
Constitutional law
Administrative regulations
Legislatures often set up boards/agencies whose functions include issuing
detailed regulations of certain kinds of conduct.
Example: state legislatures establish licensing boards to formulate
regulations for the licensing of physicians & nurses.
Constitutional law
Refers to court rulings on the requirements of the Constitution & the
constitutionality of legislation.
Although the courts cannot make laws, they have far-reaching powers to
rule on the constitutionality of laws & to declare them valid.
Approaches to Morality
Two approaches to the study of morality
1.
2.
21
Approaches to Morality
1. The Scientific, or Descriptive, approach is used in the social sciences, and is
concerned with how human beings do behave.
2. The Philosophical approach is divided into two parts
a. Normative or Prescriptive Ethics deals with norms or standards
b. Meta-ethics or Analytical Ethics this approach is analytical in two ways.
(meta- means go beyond).
Analyzes language
Analyzes the rational foundations of ethical systems, or the logic and reasoning of various
ethicists.
22
3. Individual Morality
It is concerned with human beings in relation to themselves.
4. Social Morality
It is concerned with human beings in relation to other human beings.
23
24
Moral Reason
All moral beliefs are NOT equal. We should prefer moral beliefs that are
reasonable to those that are unreasonable and those that are probably
true rather than probably false.
The following are the four elements of moral reason:
1. Uncontroversial moral truths
2. Analogies
3. Theoretical virtues
4. Thought experiments
Moral Reason
1. Uncontroversial Moral Truths
There are many highly plausible moral truths that people tend to agree
with, such as the following:
1. Suffering is bad.
2. Happiness is good.
3. If it is wrong for someone to do something in a situation, then it is wrong
for anyone to do it in an identical situation.
4. It is always or almost always wrong to torture anyone.
5. It is often wrong to steal from people.
These truths are often taken for granted during moral reasoning.
Moral Reason
2. Analogies
Analogies let us compare two things to find relevant similarities between
the two.
For example, kicking and punching people tend to be analogous actions
insofar as they are used to hurt people. They are both often wrong for the
same reason. Whenever it's wrong to hurt people, it will be wrong to kick
or punch them in order to hurt them.
Moral Reason
3. Thought Experiments
Moral thought experiments are meant to give us insight into morality.
For example, imagine that an individual puts a loaded gun up to your head
and asks you to give your wallet to her. It seems like the best thing to do
in this situation is to give your wallet. It would be absurd to criticize
someone for giving up their wallet in this scenario.
Moral Reason
4. Theoretical Virtues
These virtues help us determine when a hypothesis or belief is justified.
The virtues are:
Self-evidence
Logical consistency
Observation
Predictability
Comprehensiveness
Simplicity
Moral Reason
4. Theoretical Virtues
Self-evidence
Merely understanding the statement could be sufficient to justify the belief
in it.
For example, consider that torturing is always or almost always wrong.
Logical Consistency
The moral beliefs must not contradict one another (we want them to be
logically consistent). If we have a choice of rejecting an uncontroversial
moral truth that we are certain is true (e.g. torture is usually wrong) and a
controversial belief (e.g. whipping children is usually good), then we have
reason to reject the controversial belief.
Moral Reason
Observation
Observation is relevant to our moral beliefs. We experience that pain is
bad (in some sense), and that experience is an observation that seems to
support the hypothesis that all pain is bad.
Predictability
A hypothesis successful at making risky predictions is more likely to be
true. If I hypothesize that all pain is bad, then my predictions succeed
until I observe that some pain isn't bad.
Moral Reason
Comprehensiveness
The belief that all pain is bad is much more comprehensive than believing
that the pain of touching fire is bad. If all pain is bad, then we could use
that fact to help us do a great deal of moral reasoning as opposed to
merely realizing that burning pain is bad
Moral Reason
Simplicity
The fact that a theory is simple counts in its favor and the fact that it's
complex counts against it.
Simple moral truths, such as it's usually wrong to hurt people give us
more more plausible hypotheses than much more complex moral truths,
such as, it's usually wrong to torture people, to punch people, to kick
people, to stab people, to steal from people, and to shoot people.
Moral Reason
Simplicity
The fact that a theory is simple counts in its favor and the fact that it's
complex counts against it.
Simple moral truths, such as it's usually wrong to hurt people give us
more plausible hypotheses than much more complex moral truths, such as,
it's usually wrong to torture people, to punch people, to kick people, to
stab people, to steal from people, and to shoot people.
Summary
Ethics is the systematic reflection on what is moral and study of
morality.
Morality is the whole of opinions, decisions, and actions which people,
individually or collectively, express what they think is good or right.
Morality can be explained in all these ways:
Morality can be defined as the standards that an individual or a group has
about what is right and wrong, or good and evil.
Moral quality or character; rightness or wrongness, as of an action; the
character of being in accord with the principles or standards of right
conduct.
Morality is individual. The morality of a group decreases as its size
increases.