Chapter 11
Chapter 11
Overview
This chapter expands upon the capital budgeting techniques presented in the previous chapter
(Chapter 10). Shareholder wealth maximization relies upon selection of projects that have
positive net present values. The most important and difficult aspects of the capital budgeting
process is developing good estimates of the relevant cash flows. Chapter 11 focuses on the basics
of determining relevant after-tax cash flows of a project, from the initial cash outlay to annual
cash stream of costs and benefits and terminal cash flow. It expands capital budgeting to consider
risk with such methods as scenario analysis and simulation. Additionally, two basic riskadjustment techniques are examined: certainty equivalents and risk-adjusted discount rates.
The three components of cash flow for any project are (1) initial investment, (2) operating cash
flows, and (3) terminal cash flows.
Sunk costs are costs that have already been incurred and thus the money has already been spent.
Opportunity costs are cash flows that could be realized from the next best alternative use of an
owned asset. Sunk costs are not relevant to the investment decision because they are not
incremental. These costs will not change no matter what the final accept/reject decision.
Opportunity costs are a relevant cost. These cash flows could be realized if the decision is made
not to change the current asset structure but to utilize the owned asset for this alternative
purpose.
To minimize long-term currency risk, companies can finance a foreign investment in local
capital markets so that the projects revenues and costs are in the local currency rather than
dollars. Techniques such as currency futures, forwards, and options market instruments protect
against short-term currency risk. Financial and operating strategies that reduce political risk
include structuring the investment as a joint venture with a competent and well-connected local
partner; and using debt rather than equity financing, since debt service payments are legally
enforceable claims while equity returns such as dividends are not.
The asset may be sold (1) for more than its book value, (2) for the amount of its book value, or
(3) at a price below book value. In the first case, taxes arise from the amount by which the sale
price exceeded the book value. In the second case, no taxes would be required. In the third case,
a tax credit would occur.
The depreciable value of an asset is the installed cost of a new asset and is based on the
depreciable cost of the new project, including installation cost.
Depreciation is used to decrease the firms total tax liability and then is added back to net profits
after taxes to determine cash flow. Table 8.7 and Equation 3.4 (refer to the text) are equivalent
ways of expressing operating cash flows. The earnings before interest and taxes in Table 8.7 is
the same as the EBIT terminology in Equation 3.4. Both models then take out taxes and add back
in depreciation.
To calculate incremental operating cash inflow for both the existing situation and the proposed
project, the depreciation on assets is added back to the after-tax profits to get the cash flows
associated with each alternative. The difference between the cash flows of the proposed and
present situation, the incremental after-tax cash flows, are the relevant operating cash flows used
in evaluating the proposed project.
The terminal cash flow is the cash flow resulting from termination and liquidation of a project at
the end of its economic life. The form of calculating terminal cash flows is shown below:
Terminal Cash Flow Calculation:
After-tax proceeds from sale of new asset + NWC = Terminal Cash Flow
The relevant cash flows necessary for a conventional capital budgeting project are the
incremental after-tax cash flows attributable to the proposed project: the initial investment, the
operating cash inflows, and the terminal cash flow. The initial investment is the initial outlay
required, taking into account the installed cost of the new asset, proceeds from the sale of the old
asset, tax on the sale of the old asset, and any change in net working capital. The operating cash
inflows are the additional cash flows received as a result of implementing a proposal. Terminal
cash flow represents the after-tax cash flows expected to result from the liquidation of the project
at the end of its life. These three components represent the positive or negative cash flow impact
if the firm implements the project and are depicted in the following diagram for a project lasting
five years.
Financing costs are irrelevant cash flows even though they occur in the future. Why we dont
include financing costs in the CFs estimations?
The reason we dont include financing costs because they are used in the estimation of the PV of
future CFs. Remember, the discount rate used to estimate PV (and in turn the NPV) is nothing
but the cost of capital.
3
Risk-adjusted discount rates (RADRs) reflect the return that must be earned on a given project in
order to adequately compensate the firms owners. The relationship between RADRs and the
capital asset pricing model (CAPM) is a purely theoretical concept. The expression used to value
the expected rate of return of a security Ri (Ri = RF + [ (RM RF)]) is rewritten substituting
an asset for a security. Because real corporate assets are not traded in efficient markets and
estimation of a market return, RM, for a portfolio of such assets would be difficult, the CAPM is
not used for real assets.
A firm whose stock is actively traded in security markets generally does not increase in value
through diversification. Investors themselves can more efficiently diversify their portfolio by
holding a variety of stocks. Since a firm is not rewarded for diversification, the risk of a capital
budgeting project should be considered independently rather than in terms of their impact on the
total portfolio of assets. In practice, management usually follows this approach and evaluates
projects based on their total risk.
RADRs are most often used in practice for two reasons: (1) financial decision makers prefer
using rate of return-based criteria, and (2) they are easy to estimate and apply. In practice, risk is
subjectively categorized into classes, each having a RADR assigned to it. Each project is then
subjectively placed in the appropriate risk class.
A comparison of NPVs of unequal-lived, mutually exclusive projects is inappropriate because it
may lead to an incorrect choice of projects. The annualized net present value (ANPV) converts
the NPV of unequal-lived projects into an annual amount that can be used to select the best
project.