Partial Autopsies
Partial Autopsies
Complete Autopsy:
An unrestricted or complete autopsy includes: cranial, abdominal, thoracic, and pelvic contents.
It may include spinal cord, lower extremities, or the posterior portion of the globe of the eyes. It
does not include the face or distal upper extremities. Non-routine examinations should be
specified explicitly on the permit (e.g. "Eyes may be removed for examination" or "Includes
examination of facial tumor"). Consult with the pathologist on call if you have questions about
the wording of permits.
Restricted Autopsy:
An unrestricted autopsy is always preferable. A partial autopsy often yields partial information.
If the family wishes to restrict the extent of examination, determine exactly what parts of the
body the family does not wish to have examined and state these restrictions as specifically as
possible. For example, "No brain examination" is much less restrictive than "Chest and abdomen
only". By wording the restriction in this way one can reduce or eliminate a family's distress
concerning the autopsy without unnecessarily limiting the information to be gained from the
procedure.
Sumber
:
http://www.fletcherallen.org/services/other_services/specialties/pathology___laboratory_medicin
e/about_pathology___laboratory_medicine/divisions/anatomic_pathology/autopsy_pathology.ht
ml
: http://regional-pathology.com/partialandcomplete/
PARTIAL AUTOPSY
What is done: Partial autopsies consist of a complete evaluation of
Why choose a partial autopsy: A partial autopsy helps when the family has specific
requests or wishes to evaluate a specific area. For example, you can request a chest
only or brain only autopsy; or an evaluation of a specific organ.
See which of these questions fit for you:
Was there a heart attack?
Was there asbestosis?
Was there Alzheimers disease?
Was the foot infected?
Was there liver disease?
My loved one complained of chest pain just before he died. What caused that?
If you have single questions such as these, a partial autopsy may be right for you. If
you have more than one question, you may want to consider complete autopsy.
Also, please note, that a partial autopsy cannot definitely determine the cause of
death. Only a complete autopsy can definitively determine the cause of the death.
surgery; or liver disease; and so on) you can request that this specific area be
assessed. Please be aware that such an assessment will not provide the cause of
death, but just an evaluation of the one area you request.
: http://autopsychicago.com/services/partial-autopsy/
He said: Its traumatic when a family has to wait days to bury the body of their loved one.
Sometimes we have to bury parts of the body twice as the coroners analysis can take up to two
weeks. Its a double whammy for the family.
This report has showed that most of the post mortems are unnecessary. Logic doesnt come into
it.
In England, more than a fifth of deaths are referred to the coroner a number the report argues is
too high and too costly.
Professor Pounder based his recommendations on the Scottish system, which favours less
invasive examinations in the majority of cases.
He said there is not enough cash and expertise to make sure autopsies are carried out properly
and also that many are not needed, causing families extra pain.
The professor, whose findings were published in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine,
explained: We need to be much more thoughtful in selecting which deaths we autopsy.
We simply do not have the people to perform well such large numbers. The inevitable result is a
lowering of autopsy standards and a false sense of security that we have properly investigated the
death.
Other methods, like assessing external injuries and making small incisions to get blood for
toxicology reports were suggested.
Families rights and freedom of religious practice should be balanced against the need to
investigate the death, the expert added.
The Coroners Society of England and Wales said there is not currently enough research into
whether the recommendations are reliable.
It added it would welcome a reduction in the numbers of autopsies as long as the methods could
be shown to be accurate and comply with current rules.