Basic Concepts
Basic Concepts
The introduction of more and more complex standards makes it nearly impossible for fabricators to
determine profiles and glass panes during the estimation which shall later fulfil the conditions of a
structural analysis.
It is possible that a low-priced profile or glass is structurally insufficient whereas a structural safe
section is no longer profitable. Where shall fabricators get this important information from?
On the one hand you should better ask a structural engineer prior to submittal of quotation to make a
reliable statement about the designated sections, on the other hand you usually prefer saving these
costs as long as the order isnt placed with you.
The LogiKal statics module helps you to close this gap by performing the preliminary structural
design of beams in glass panes in doors, windows and curtain walls. Herein beams can consider
different materials (aluminium, steel, wood) and glass panes are able to consider different glass types
(Float Glass, Toughened Safety Glass, Semi-Tempered Glass, Laminated Safety Glass, etc.).
Picture 1
The program recognises Pin Supports (normal force N0, shear force Q0, bending moment M=0)
and Roller Supports (normal force N=0, shear force Q0, bending moment M=0). Fixed supports
(normal force N0, shear force Q0, bending moment M0) are not applied. Picture 1 shows a more
detailed support definition. The bottom support is always automatically a pin support, the top support
is a roller support. All additional intermediate supports are freely definable.
It is postulated that profile or mullion splices produce a rigid connection, i.e. a pin connection or a
rotation spring stiffness is neglected. Therefore you must check carefully whether the applied splice
type fulfils these requirements or not. If not it is still safe to move the splice to the position where the
moment diagram shows zero.
Picture 2a
The decisive distributed load according to the requirements of the design load standard results from
on the load cases wind pressure and wind suction. In order to convert load per unit area into load per
unit length the program applies load distribution areas.
Orgadata AG, 14.10.2014
All multi-span-beams strictly apply rectangular load distribution areas. Picture 2a shows a curtain wall
with a distributed load acting evenly over height and width. In this particular case the load per unit
length A on beam 1 results from multiplying the distributed load by half of the distance to the next
beam: Within span 1.1 the factor amounts to B1/2, within span 1.2 to B1/2 and within span 1.3 to (B1
+B2)/2.
For beam 2 and load per unit length B it is necessary to consider the load distribution areas left and
right of the beam: Span 2.1 and 2.2 own the same factor which is (B1+B2)/2.
Beam 3 represents a special case. The support between span 3.2 and 3.3 isnt set at the same height
as the transom connection is. In order to avoid different constant distributed loads within span 3.2 the
program assumes that the largest load distribution area is applied for the whole span. Thus it results
in the following factors: span 3.1 (B2+B3)/2, span 3.2 and span 3.3 (B1+B2+B3+B4)/2 each.
When calculating a beams load it is assumed that all loads per unit length are evenly distributed over
the span, i.e. a load saltus is only possible at a supports position and not between two supports. Thus
it appears that the applied load is larger than theoretically required. In our example this is
represented by area D on beam 3 which is included in area C even though the area is already
considered in area B on beam 2. However, this simplification is safe from a structural engineers point
of view.
Picture 2b
For all single-span-beams the load distribution area results from trapezoids or triangles. Picture 2b
shows a window element with a distributed load acting evenly over height and width. Since B 1 is
smaller than L, the maximum ordinate of the trapezoidal load per unit length on beam 1 (area A)
results from multiplying the distributed load by B 1 /2. For beam 2 and load per unit length it is
necessary to consider different load distribution areas (area B: trapezoid, area C: triangle) because
the field widths B1 and B2 differ. The trapezoidal load per unit length (area B) is calculated analogous
to beam 1 (area A) here. Since B2 is larger than L, the maximum ordinate of the triangular load per
unit length on beam 2 (area C) results from multiplying the distributed load by L/2. The triangular load
per unit length on beam 3 (area D) is calculated analogous to beam 2 (area C) here.
LogiKal analyses the ultimate state of serviceability, i.e. the systems deflections. This one is usually
decisive for the design in practice because deflection limits are usually exceeded prior to stress limits.
Orgadata AG, 14.10.2014
The load bearing capacity is not considered, i.e. neither an ultimate strength analysis nor a stability
analysis like buckling or lateral torsional buckling are performed. Thus it is sufficient to multiply the
applied loads by a partial safety factor of 1.0.
Results
DEFLECTION LINE
This is the beams deformation diagram due to the applied load. It is decisive for the design.
Deflection limits are to be entered by the user. Those values usually depend on the designated
glazing and thus they have to be requested at the glass manufacturer. Common limit values are 8mm
or L/300.
Since the deflection is reciprocally proportional to the second moment of area (moment of inertia)
LogiKal is able to calculate the required Ix value and to decide whether the profiles current Ix value is
structurally sufficient or not.
The statics module splits the beam into individual spans measuring Lm which are located between two
supports each. A constant distributed wind load wm acts on every span. A beam span might be split
into individual glass spans Lm,n by transoms i.
First the program checks whether the maximum existing deflection max vm due to the action wm on
span m (between two supports) does not exceed the limit values. Second LogiKal surveys if the
maximum existing deflection of the glass spans m,n (between two transoms i and i+1) keeps the limit
values. For this the nodes i are linked to a chord diagram (red lines). The chord diagram serves as
reference for the relative deflections of glass spans. Afterwards the maximum existing relative
deflection within the glass span max vm,n is calculated by subtracting the deflection of the chord
diagram (red) from the actual deflection of the deflection line (green).
Later it is displayed in the printouts which of the two parameters beam span or glass span deflection
Orgadata AG, 14.10.2014
MOMENT DIAGRAM
Displays the run of the bending moment curve within a beam. Without having an influence on the
calculated results non-rigid profile splices might be placed where the moment curve crosses the
x-axis. It is also possible to calculate the existing stress within a beam by the moment diagram.
However, stress is not applied to design the profile. For this the deflection curve is decisive
exclusively.
SHEAR DIAGRAM
Displays the run of the shear force curve within a beam. The x-intercepts of the shear diagram
represent the places where the moment diagram shows a minimum or maximum.
SUPPORT REACTIONS
Adding the shear forces acting right and left to the support results in the support force. It might be
used to design e.g. anchors. But you should keep in mind that the calculated support reactions might
have to be multiplied by a partial safety factor gF in design for strength.
Glass Statics
Glasses are calculated as rectangular linear supported plates in compliance with the Kirchhoff plate
theory. This states that the stresses within the midsurface equal to zero and that transverse shear
deformation is neglected.
As soon as glass deflections become larger than the glass pane thickness the so called membrane
effect is activated significantly. From a structural point of view it is safe that the calculation method
neglects this positive effect of geometrical nonlinearity.