03 Chapter 3
03 Chapter 3
CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY
This chapter presents the methods that have been used in this study to investigate the
process of disclosure among a group of black South African homosexuals.
Qualitative design deals with data that is primarily verbal and derives meaning from
the participants perspective and also aims to understand meaning that people attach
to everyday life (Bless & Higson-Son, 1995; De Vos, 1998). The qualitative approach
is appropriate for this study because the data collected and used focuses on the
participants subjective experiences on the process of disclosure and the way they
interpret them. Marshall & Rossman (1995) further outline that the qualitative
approach to research is uniquely suited to uncovering the unexpected and to exploring
new avenues.
39
the study.
After prospective participants were identified, the researcher approached and invited
them to participate in the study. They were presented with the information sheet and
were further informed about their right to refuse participation and that participation
was voluntary. When they agreed to participate, they were also made aware of their
right to withdraw from partaking in the interview. They were further informed that the
information that they provided in the interviews would also be treated with
confidentiality; they were not required to disclose their identifying details. Finally,
they were presented with consent forms for their participation and for the audio tape
recording that they signed to give their consent.
The sample consisted of six (6) black South African male participants between the
ages of eighteen (18) and twenty-five (25) who are WITS students. All participants
have disclosed their homosexual orientation, four (4) have fully disclosed and two (2)
have partially disclosed. Full disclosure is a type of disclosure which involves
disclosing ones sexual orientation to everyone around the person. Whereas in partial
40
disclosure, one only discloses to a certain group of people that one feels comfortable
with.
Bogdan & Taylor (1975) listed acceptance and understanding as part of the basic
principles of unstructured interviewing. This proved to be a valuable aspect in rapport
building between the researcher and the participants as it was evident that some of the
participants seemed encouraged by the researchers non-judgmental attitude towards
them. At the same time the researcher was cautious of the emotional involvement that
could affect the validity and the reliability of the data (Ferreira, et al., 1988: 147).
Bogdan & Taylor (1975) add that it is the interviewers responsibility to create an
atmosphere in which participants will feel comfortable enough to talk freely and
openly. This was achieved by allowing participants to take part in choosing an
appropriate and conducive venue for the interviews.
41
more meaningful units for interpretation (Singleton, 1997). The steps used in
developing themes were informed by Marshall & Rossman (1989) in De Vos (1998)
and included the following procedures:
Organising data:
The transcribed data was repetitively read through for the researcher to be familiar
with the data.
Generating categories, themes and patterns:
This is a stage that required creative and analytical thinking. The researcher then
identified the most important themes, recurring ideas, and patterns of belief, which
assisted with the integration of the results. The process of category generation
involved noting patterns in the research participants.
As categories of meaning
emerged, the researcher searched for those that were internally consistent but distinct
from each other. Patterns, themes and categories were uncovered.
Testing emergent hypotheses:
When categories and patterns between them became apparent in the data, the
researcher then evaluated the credibility of these developing hypotheses and testing
them against the data. This involved evaluating the data for their informational
adequacy, credibility, usefulness and centrality.
Searching for alternative explanations:
As the categories and patterns between them emerged in the data, the researcher
engaged in challenging the patterns that seemed apparent.
Alternative explanations
were looked and described until the researcher reached the explanations that are most
reasonable of all.
42
Report the results:
By reporting the results report, the researcher gives shape and interpretation and
meaning to the huge amounts of raw data.