Accounting Rate of Return
Accounting Rate of Return
Theoretical Background
The accounting rate of return (ARR), or alternatively the book rate of return, is a
popular rule of thumb capital budgeting technique used by managers of firms to
evaluate real investment projects (Hillier, Grinblatt and Titman, 2008).
The
investments, the higher the accounting rate of return, the more attractive an
investment is.
There are several advantages to using the accounting rate of return as a capital
budgeting technique. As Bester (nd) notes, the main advantage of the accounting
rate of return is that it is relatively simple and easy to understand and calculate, thus
allowing managers to use the measure as a quick estimate with which to compare
investments.
However, despite the above advantages, the accounting rate of return has
numerous, distinct disadvantages. An important weakness of the technique is that it
makes use of accounting profit (book values) which may be very different to the cash
Empirical Evidence
International Evidence
Numerous international studies conducted on capital budgeting techniques
employed by firms, generally have indicated that the accounting rate of return is not
a method used by the majority of firms. In a study conducted by Graham and Harvey
(2001), it was found that 20.29% of U.S. firms always or almost always use the
accounting rate of return as a capital budgeting technique. This is a relatively low
percentage when compared to the usage of discounted cash flow techniques such
as the NPV and IRR methods. A study by Ryan and Ryan (2002) showed that 15%
of U.S. firms preferred to use this method. The unpopularity of the accounting rate of
return is further illustrated in a capital budgeting survey of European firms conducted
by Brounen, de Jong and Koedijk (2004).
determined a much lower preference of firms using the accounting rate of return only 14% of firms almost or always almost employ it as a capital budgeting tool.
Furthermore, Correia, Flynn, Uliana and Wormald (2007) show in their study from
1972-1995, that there has been a decline in the use of the accounting rate of return
in favour of an increase in the use of NPV and IRR (Correia & Cramer, 2008). In
addition, in the study of firms in the Western Cape Province of South Africa, it was
found that the accounting rate of return was the least used capital budgeting
technique (Brijlal & Quesada, 2009).
Thus from the above empirical evidence found in both international and South
African studies, it can be concluded that the accounting rate of return is not a primary
method used by firms when evaluating capital investment decisions, rather it is used
as a supplementary method to other more popular techniques. The evidence shows
that there has been a significant decline in the use the accounting rate of return and
the main reason for this, as stated by Correia and Cramer (2008), is that there may
be a lack of understanding of how the accounting rate of return is defined.