Celestial Navigation What Are The Options?
Celestial Navigation What Are The Options?
Celestial Navigation
What are the Options?
There are so many variations possible that we can not discuss them all. For example, it is even possible
to do some sort of celestial navigation with sticks and bits of paper, but that's not what we're talking
about here. People interested in such things should consult books like "Emergency Navigation" by David
Burch.
For our purposes a minimum of three pieces of equipment will be required. A sextant (for measuring the
angle of celestial objects above the horizon,) an accurate clock that can be read to hours, minutes and
seconds (four seconds error can put you off a mile) and , finally, a copy of the "Nautical Almanac" for
the current year. The almanac contains tables that you use to calculate the exact location of the sun,
moon, planets or stars you have observed.
Of course, it is possible to do something with these three pieces of equipment taken singly or in pairs (six
possibilities) but these options will not concern us at the moment.
The time honored "noon shot," where the navigator observes the sun while it is passing through its
highest point for the day is a good place for us to start. The angle of the sun above the horizon at its
highest point is measured with the sextant and easily (using the Nautical Almanac) converted to latitude.
The time when the sun reaches its highest point is easily converted to longitude in the same way. So, if
you stick to noon shoots, that's all there is to it. An hour or so of instruction, a few hours of practice, and
you're on your way. I read somewhere that this is just about all the old-time navigators ever did. You can
also measure the altitude (and time of observation) of the north star (Polaris) and calculate your latitude
rather easily using tables in the Nautical Almanac.
You can measure the altitude (angle above the horizon) of the sun at other times during the day, or the
moon, or (if you stick to brief periods around sunrise and sunset when both stars and horizon are visible)
you can also measure the altitude of stars and planets. But this is where it starts to get more complicated.
For many of you "celestial navigation" means stars, so let's forge on.
This is the heart of the matter. Assume you have measured the altitude (and time) for a number of
celestial objects. What now? The standard approach (attributed to Marcq Saint Hilaire) is called the
intercept method of sight reduction. In this approach you use the Nautical Almanac to look up the
position of the object at the time of observation. Then you calculate the altitude (angle above the
horizion) and azimuth (angle from true north) that the object should have had based on your assumed
position. Comparison of the calculated and observed values of the altitude gives rise to a line of position
(LOP) that helps you determine your true position. This is where it gets harder and there are many
different ways of proceeding.
Just to be perfectly clear, let's backup and go over the procedure one more time, step by step:
http://www.nav.org/cel/introduction.html (1 of 3) [9/6/2004 2:22:13 PM]
below the celestial equator) is less than 29 degrees. This is good enough for the sun, moon, planets and
some stars. Volume I is something completely different. It has the sub-title "Selected Stars." Each day a
changing set of seven stars (out of the 41 best navigation stars) are presented in a way that combines the
functions of the almanac and sight reduction tables. It even suggests the 3 best stars in each case.
Most modern books on celestial navigation are based on the use of HO-249. Some good examples are
"Celestial Navigation by HO-249" by John E. Milligan, "One-day Celestial Navigation" by Otis S.
Brown or "Miranav" by Rosalind Miranda. Of course, if you have taken a course based on the traditional
use of HO-229 it is easy to switch. I usually teach HO-229 because I have found that many people want
to learn the most traditional possible form of the subject, but I'm thinking of switching to HO-249
because it is so similar (and there are fewer volumes to lug around).
Finally, let me mention my own favorite form of celestial navigation. The "Celesticomp V" hand
calculator. This little jewel will run your DR (dead reckoning) track for you and use it as your assumed
position. It contains the celestial object positions so no almanac is required. You just punch in your
observations (object code, altitude and time) and out comes a LOP. It will even combine LOPs into a fix
and then start your new DR track from the fix. It's great. I enjoy making the observations and plotting the
results more than I enjoy all the paperwork of looking things up in the Nautical Almanac and Sight
Reduction Tables, so this works great for me. Of course, the real fun is being able to do it all and
knowing different ways to do each thing. For example, I sometimes use a hand calculator method called
"Sumner's Lines" that gives a LOP from quite a different approach than the usual method.
The equipment I use consists of an Astra IIIB sextant, which is without question the best deal around
considering its high quality and relatively low price. I have attached a small digital clock to the sextant
and I carry the sextant in a small foam lined high impact plastic case that can take a ton of pressure or a 7
foot drop (and it floats). There is also space in the case for my Celesticomp V calculator, my hand
calculator, an electronic handbearing compass and a copy of the current Nautical Almanac. With this
arrangement there is a substantial amount of redundancy and everything is in one place.
Bill Myers
www.nav.org
[email protected]
powered by FreeFind
Find!
Site Map