Contract Law
Contract Law
Scenario 1:
To be able to establish a contract, there must be an offer. One must
clearly state the difference between an invitation to treat and an offer.
An example of invitation to treat can be seen in this leading case.
Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v. Boots [1953] 1 QB 401.
Macmillan and Stone (2012) given the principal from Canadian Dyers
Association Ltd. V. Burton [1920] 47 O.L.R 259 (H.C) and also Harvey v.
Facey [1893] AC 552 an ordinary quotation of price does not make up an
offer to sell to the person to whom the quotation is addressed. It is no
more than an invitation to treat. An advertisement is merely an invitation
to treat according to the precedent from Partridge v Crittenden (1968) 2
All ER 425. Therefore there was not an offer and there was no contract
formed.
Scenario 2:
To establish if there was a contract there must be an agreement. An
agreement consists of an offer and acceptance. For Bob to have started
work, it meant that there was a clear acceptance through the conduct
because the offer was a clear and plain promise Woodhouse A.C Israel
Cocoa Ltd v. Nigerian Product Marketing Co ltd [1972] A.C 741.
However, the contract became discharged in performance because
payment was after completion. Thus, the general rule of no completion;
no payment established from Cutter v. Powell (1795) EWHC KB J13 is
applicable. Since the contract was discharged through performance it is
seen as promissory estoppel. Thus, there is a contact even without a
consideration.
Bibliography
(no
date)