Acceptance Sampling Plan
Acceptance Sampling Plan
Acceptance
Sampling
Plans
AQL
LTPD
To Accompany Krajewski & Ritzman Operations Management: Strategy and Analysis, Sixth Edition 2002 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.
To Accompany Krajewski & Ritzman Operations Management: Strategy and Analysis, Sixth Edition 2002 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.
Number of defectives
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Figure J.1
|
10
|
20
|
|
|
30
40
50
Cumulative sample size
|
60
|
70
To Accompany Krajewski & Ritzman Operations Management: Strategy and Analysis, Sixth Edition 2002 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.
8
7
6
5
4
Continue sampling
3
2
1
0
Figure J.1
|
10
|
20
|
|
|
30
40
50
Cumulative sample size
|
60
|
70
To Accompany Krajewski & Ritzman Operations Management: Strategy and Analysis, Sixth Edition 2002 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.
8
7
6
Reject
5
4
Continue sampling
3
2
Accept
1
0
Figure J.1
|
10
|
20
|
|
|
30
40
50
Cumulative sample size
|
60
|
70
To Accompany Krajewski & Ritzman Operations Management: Strategy and Analysis, Sixth Edition 2002 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.
8
7
6
Reject
5
4
Decision
to reject
Continue sampling
3
2
Accept
1
0
Figure J.1
|
10
|
20
|
|
|
30
40
50
Cumulative sample size
|
60
|
70
To Accompany Krajewski & Ritzman Operations Management: Strategy and Analysis, Sixth Edition 2002 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.
To Accompany Krajewski & Ritzman Operations Management: Strategy and Analysis, Sixth Edition 2002 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.
Probability of acceptance
Figure J.2
Proportion defective
To Accompany Krajewski & Ritzman Operations Management: Strategy and Analysis, Sixth Edition 2002 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.
Ideal OC curve
Figure J.2
Proportion defective
To Accompany Krajewski & Ritzman Operations Management: Strategy and Analysis, Sixth Edition 2002 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.
Ideal OC curve
Figure J.2
Typical OC curve
Proportion defective
To Accompany Krajewski & Ritzman Operations Management: Strategy and Analysis, Sixth Edition 2002 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.
Probability of acceptance
Ideal OC curve
Typical OC curve
Figure J.2
AQL
LTPD
Proportion defective
To Accompany Krajewski & Ritzman Operations Management: Strategy and Analysis, Sixth Edition 2002 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.
To Accompany Krajewski & Ritzman Operations Management: Strategy and Analysis, Sixth Edition 2002 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
|
|
1 2
(AQL)
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
6 7
(LTPD)
|
8
|
9
|
10
Probability of acceptance
1.0
0.9
Probability
of c or less
defects
(Pa)
np
n = 60
c=1
Comments
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
|
|
1 2
(AQL)
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
6 7
(LTPD)
|
8
|
9
|
10
1.0
0.9
Proportion
defective
(p)
np
Probability
of c or less
defects
(Pa)
n = 60
c=1
Comments
0.8
np 0.7 0
1
2
.05 0.6.951
.999 1.000
.10 0.5.905
.995 1.000
.20 0.4.819
.982 .999
.25 0.3.779
.974 .998
.35 0.2.705
.951 .994
.40 0.1.670
.938 .992
Example J.1
To Accompany Krajewski & Ritzman Operations Management: Strategy and Analysis, Sixth Edition 2002 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.
1.0
0.9
0.8
Proportion
Defective
(p)
0.01 (AQL)
np
Probability
of c or less
defects
(Pa)
n = 60
c=1
Comments
0.6
np 0.7 0
1
2
.05 0.6.951
.999 1.000
.10 0.5.905
.995 1.000
.20 0.4.819
.982 .999
.25 0.3.779
.974 .998
.35 0.2.705
.951 .994
.40 0.1.670
.938 .992
Example J.1
To Accompany Krajewski & Ritzman Operations Management: Strategy and Analysis, Sixth Edition 2002 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.
1.0
0.9
0.8
Proportion
defective
(p)
0.01 (AQL)
np
Probability
of c or less
defects
(Pa)
n = 60
c=1
Comments
0.6
np 0.7 0
1
2
.05 0.6.951
.999 1.000
.10 0.5.905
.995 1.000
.20 0.4.819
.982 .999
.25 0.3.779
.974 .998
.35 0.2.705
.951 .994
.40 0.1.670
.938 .992
Example J.1
To Accompany Krajewski & Ritzman Operations Management: Strategy and Analysis, Sixth Edition 2002 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.
1.0
0.9
0.8
Proportion
defective
(p)
0.01 (AQL)
np
Probability
of c or less
defects
(Pa)
0.6
0.878
np 0.7 0
1
2
.05 0.6.951
.999 1.000
.10 0.5.905
.995 1.000
.20 0.4.819
.982 .999
.25 0.3.779
.974 .998
.35 0.2.705
.951 .994
.40 0.1.670
.938 .992
n = 60
c=1
Comments
Example J.1
To Accompany Krajewski & Ritzman Operations Management: Strategy and Analysis, Sixth Edition 2002 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.
1.0
0.9
0.8
Proportion
defective
(p)
0.01 (AQL)
np
Probability
of c or less
defects
(Pa)
0.6
0.878
np 0.7 0
1
2
.05 0.6.951
.999 1.000
.10 0.5.905
.995 1.000
.20 0.4.819
.982 .999
.25 0.3.779
.974 .998
.35 0.2.705
.951 .994
.40 0.1.670
.938 .992
n = 60
c=1
Comments
Example J.1
To Accompany Krajewski & Ritzman Operations Management: Strategy and Analysis, Sixth Edition 2002 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.
Probability of acceptance
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.01 (AQL)
np
Probability
of c or less
defects
(Pa)
0.6
0.878
n = 60
c=1
Comments
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
|
|
1 2
(AQL)
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
6 7
(LTPD)
|
8
|
9
|
10
Probability of acceptance
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.01 (AQL)
0.663 0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06 (LTPD)
0.07
0.308
0.08
0.09 0.199
0.10
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
Probability
of c or less
defects
(Pa)
np
0.6
1.2
1.8
2.4
3.0
3.6
4.2
4.8
5.4
6.0
0.878
0.663
0.463
0.308
0.199
0.126
0.078
0.048
0.029
0.017
0.048
0.1
0.0
|
|
1 2
(AQL)
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
6 7
(LTPD)
|
8
|
9
n = 60
c=1
Comments
= 0.126
|
10
1.0
0.9
0.878
0.8
0.663
0.7
0.6
0.463
0.5
0.4
0.308
0.3
0.199
0.126
0.2
0.1
|
0.0 |
1 2
(AQL)
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
6 7
(LTPD)
0.078
0.048
|
8
|
9
0.029
| 0.017
10
1.0
0.9
0.878 = 0.122
0.8
0.7
0.663
0.6
0.463
0.5
0.4
0.308
0.3
0.199
0.126
0.2
0.1 = 0.126
|
|
0.0 |
1 2 3
(AQL)
|
4
|
5
|
|
6 7
(LTPD)
0.078
0.048
|
8
|
9
0.029
| 0.017
10
To Accompany Krajewski & Ritzman Operations Management: Strategy and Analysis, Sixth Edition 2002 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
|
|
1 2
(AQL)
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
6 7
(LTPD)
|
8
|
9
|
10
Figure J.4
To Accompany Krajewski & Ritzman Operations Management: Strategy and Analysis, Sixth Edition 2002 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.
1.0
Producers
Risk
(p = AQL)
0.9
0.8
0.7
Consumers
Risk
(p = LTPD)
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
|
|
1 2
(AQL)
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
6 7
(LTPD)
|
8
|
9
|
10
Figure J.4
To Accompany Krajewski & Ritzman Operations Management: Strategy and Analysis, Sixth Edition 2002 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.
1.0
Producers
Risk
(p = AQL)
Consumers
Risk
(p = LTPD)
60
0.122
0.126
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
|
|
1 2
(AQL)
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
6 7
(LTPD)
|
8
|
9
|
10
Figure J.4
To Accompany Krajewski & Ritzman Operations Management: Strategy and Analysis, Sixth Edition 2002 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.
1.0
Producers
Risk
(p = AQL)
Consumers
Risk
(p = LTPD)
60
80
0.122
0.191
0.126
0.048
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
|
|
1 2
(AQL)
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
6 7
(LTPD)
|
8
|
9
|
10
Figure J.4
To Accompany Krajewski & Ritzman Operations Management: Strategy and Analysis, Sixth Edition 2002 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
Producers
Risk
(p = AQL)
Consumers
Risk
(p = LTPD)
0.122
0.191
0.264
0.126
0.048
0.017
60
80
100
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
|
|
1 2
(AQL)
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
6 7
(LTPD)
|
8
|
9
|
10
Figure J.4
To Accompany Krajewski & Ritzman Operations Management: Strategy and Analysis, Sixth Edition 2002 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
Producers
Risk
(p = AQL)
Consumers
Risk
(p = LTPD)
0.122
0.191
0.264
0.332
0.126
0.048
0.017
0.006
60
80
100
120
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
|
|
1 2
(AQL)
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
6 7
(LTPD)
|
8
|
9
|
10
Figure J.4
To Accompany Krajewski & Ritzman Operations Management: Strategy and Analysis, Sixth Edition 2002 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.
1.0
0.9
n = 60, c = 1
0.8
n = 80, c = 1
0.7
0.6
n = 100, c = 1
0.5
0.4
n = 120, c = 1
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
|
|
1 2
(AQL)
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
6 7
(LTPD)
|
8
|
9
|
10
Figure J.4
To Accompany Krajewski & Ritzman Operations Management: Strategy and Analysis, Sixth Edition 2002 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.
To Accompany Krajewski & Ritzman Operations Management: Strategy and Analysis, Sixth Edition 2002 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
|
|
1 2
(AQL)
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
6 7
(LTPD)
|
8
|
9
|
10
1.0
0.9
0.8
Producers
Risk
(p = AQL)
0.7
0.6
Consumers
Risk
(p = LTPD)
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
|
|
1 2
(AQL)
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
6 7
(LTPD)
|
8
|
9
|
10
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.6
Producers
Risk
(p = AQL)
0.5
0.122
0.7
Consumers
Risk
(p = LTPD)
0.126
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
|
|
1 2
(AQL)
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
6 7
(LTPD)
|
8
|
9
|
10
1.0
0.9
0.8
Producers
Risk
(p = AQL)
Consumers
Risk
(p = LTPD)
1
2
0.122
0.023
0.126
0.303
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
|
|
1 2
(AQL)
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
6 7
(LTPD)
|
8
|
9
|
10
1.0
0.9
0.8
Producers
Risk
(p = AQL)
Consumers
Risk
(p = LTPD)
1
2
3
0.122
0.023
0.003
0.126
0.303
0.515
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
|
|
1 2
(AQL)
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
6 7
(LTPD)
|
8
|
9
|
10
1.0
0.9
0.8
Producers
Risk
(p = AQL)
Consumers
Risk
(p = LTPD)
1
2
3
4
0.122
0.023
0.003
0.000
0.126
0.303
0.515
0.726
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
|
|
1 2
(AQL)
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
6 7
(LTPD)
|
8
|
9
|
10
Probability of acceptance
1.0
n = 60, c = 2
n = 60, c = 3
n = 60, c = 4
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
|
|
1 2
(AQL)
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
6 7
(LTPD)
|
8
|
9
|
10
To Accompany Krajewski & Ritzman Operations Management: Strategy and Analysis, Sixth Edition 2002 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.
Expected
Defectives
0.0509
0.3552
0.8112
1.3675
1.9680
2.6256
3.2838
3.9794
4.6936
5.4237
6.1635
LTPD Based
Sample
Size
Expected
Defectives
Sample
Size
5
36
81
137
197
263
328
398
469
542
616
2.2996
3.8875
5.3217
6.6697
7.9894
9.2647
10.5139
11.7726
12.9903
14.2042
15.4036
38
65
89
111
133
154
175
196
217
237
257
To Accompany Krajewski & Ritzman Operations Management: Strategy and Analysis, Sixth Edition 2002 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.
To Accompany Krajewski & Ritzman Operations Management: Strategy and Analysis, Sixth Edition 2002 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
Example J.2
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
Proportion
Defective
(p)
np
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
Example J.2
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
Proportion
Defective
(p)
np
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
1.10
2.20
3.30
4.40
5.50
6.60
7.70
8.80
1.6
0.974
1.2
0.819
0.581 = (0.603 + 0.558)/2
0.359
0.202 = (0.213
+ 0.191)/2
0.8
0.105
0.052 = (0.055 + 0.048)/2
0.024
0.4
0
Example J.2
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
Proportion
Defective
(p)
np
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
1.10
2.20
3.30
4.40
5.50
6.60
7.70
8.80
1.6
0.974
1.2
0.819
0.581 = (0.603 + 0.558)/2
0.359
0.202
+ 0.191)/2
0.8
For p==(0.213
0.01:
0.105
0.052 = (0.055 + 0.048)/2
0.024
0.4
0
Example J.2
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
Proportion
Defective
(p)
np
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
1.10
2.20
3.30
4.40
5.50
6.60
7.70
8.80
1.6
0.974
1.2
0.819
0.581 = (0.603 + 0.558)/2
0.359
0.202
+ 0.191)/2
0.8
0.01(0.974)(1000 110)/1000 = 0.0087
For p==(0.213
0.01:
0.105
0.052 = (0.055 + 0.048)/2
0.024
0.4
0
Example J.2
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
Proportion
Defective
(p)
np
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
1.10
2.20
3.30
4.40
5.50
6.60
7.70
8.80
1.6
0.974
1.2
0.819
0.581 = (0.603 + 0.558)/2
0.359
0.202
+ 0.191)/2
0.8
0.01(0.974)(1000 110)/1000 = 0.0087
For p==(0.213
0.01:
0.105
0.052 = (0.055 + 0.048)/2
0.024
0.4
0
Example J.2
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
Proportion
Defective
(p)
np
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
1.10
2.20
3.30
4.40
5.50
6.60
7.70
8.80
1.6
0.974
1.2
0.819
0.581 = (0.603 + 0.558)/2
0.359
0.202
+ 0.191)/2
0.8
0.01(0.974)(1000 110)/1000 = 0.0087
For p==(0.213
0.01:
0.105
For p = 0.02:
0.02(0.819)(1000 110)/1000 = 0.0146
0.052
=
(0.055
+
0.048)/2
For p = 0.03:
0.03(0.581)(1000 110)/1000 = 0.0155
0.024
For p = 0.04:
0.04(0.359)(1000 110)/1000 = 0.0128
0.4
For p = 0.05:
For p = 0.06:
For p = 0.07:
For p = 0.08: 0
Example J.2
Proportion
Defective
(p)
np
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
1.10
2.20
3.30
4.40
5.50
6.60
7.70
8.80
1.6
0.974
1.2
0.819
0.581 = (0.603 + 0.558)/2
0.359
0.202 = (0.213
+ 0.191)/2
0.8
0.105
0.052 = (0.055 + 0.048)/2
0.024
0.4
0
Example J.2
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
Example J.2
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
1.2
0.8
0.4
0
Figure J.6
AOQL
1.6
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
Solved Problem
Probability of acceptance (Pa)
1.000
0.996
1.0
= 0.049
0.9
0.951
0.810
0.8
0.7
0.587
0.6
0.5
0.363
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
|
1
|
2
|
3
(AQL)
|
4
0.194
0.092
0.039
= 0.092
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.015
5
6
7 8 9
10
(LTPD)