03VI TechManual Visual Imp
03VI TechManual Visual Imp
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Acknowledgements........................................................................4
SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION...............................................................................6
SECTION 2: VISUAL IMPAIRMENT:
DEFINITION/ELIGIBILITY STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES....................11
SECTION 3: CHILD FIND/SCREENING AND REFERRAL.................................13
Community Awareness and Child Find............................................13
Flowchart: Sequence for Evaluation................................................15
SECTION 4: GUIDELINES FOR EVALUATION..................................................16
Medical Evaluation and Report.........................................................16
Functional Vision and Media Assessment.......................................16
Review of School History and Education Records...16
Educational Performance Assessment......................17
Functional Vision Assessment....................................19
Learning Media Assessment.......................................21
Documentation of Adverse Affects.............................25
Educational Implications.............................................27
Expanded Core Curriculum Skills Assessment..............................30
Compensatory Skills Including Communication Modes
30
Orientation and Mobility..............................................30
Social Interaction Skills...............................................31
Independent Living Skills............................................31
Recreation and Leisure................................................32
Career Education..........................................................32
Assistive Technology...................................................32
Visual Efficiency...........................................................33
Questions to Ask When Developing an Educational Plan.............34
Functional Vision and Media Assessment Report..........................37
Low Vision Assessment.....................................................................38
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The Tennessee Department of Education would like to thank the members of the
Visual Impairment Task Force for their diligent work and dedication to the
development of the standards for Visual Impairment. We would like to thank Mr.
Joseph Fisher, Assistant Commissioner of Special Education for his support of
this endeavor.
Becky McBee
Vision Coordinator
Knox County Schools
Jennifer Bell
Coordinator Providing Access to the
Visual Environment (Project P.A.V.E.)
Peabody College, Vanderbilt University
Tom Sering
Special Education Supervisor
Milan City Schools
Dr. Joan Shagan
School Psychologist
Tennessee School for the Blind
Dr. Sheri Trent
Professor of Special Education
Middle Tennessee State University
Dr. Mila Truan
Reading Specialist
Tennessee School for the Blind
Caren Wayburn
Tennessee Technical Assistance and Resources
for Enhancing Deafblind Supports (Project
TREDS)
Peabody College, Vanderbilt University
Karen White
Teacher of Students with Visual Impairments
Metro-Nashville Public Schools
Vicki Wolczyk
Teacher of Students with Visual Impairments
Tennessee School for the Blind
The Division of Special Education wishes to express a heartfelt thank you to the
professionals who have contributed many hours of expertise in the collaboration,
writing and editing of this manual:
Ralph Brewer, SuperintendentTennessee School for the Blind
Dr. Anne Corn, Professor in Department of Special EducationPeabody College,
Vanderbilt University
Dr. Randall Harley, Emeritus Professor of Special EducationPeabody College,
Vanderbilt University
Ann Sanders, Director of Assessment, Information and ResearchState Department of
Education
Dr. LaRhea Sanford, Lead Teacher-Vision ProgramMetro-Nashville Public Schools
Dr. Joan Shagan, School PsychologistTennessee School for the Blind
Dr. Sheri Trent, Professor of Special EducationMiddle Tennessee State University
Dr. Mila Truan, Reading SpecialistTennessee School for the Blind
INTRODUCTION
Section 1
The reauthorization of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) in 1997 is
the third major statutory reauthorization since PL 94-142 was first enacted in 1975.
IDEA '97 and its accompanying regulations are integrated documents that expand on
and strengthen the requirements of earlier versions. Although many sections remain
unchanged, greater emphasis has been placed on the participation and progress of
children with disabilities in the general curriculum, disciplinary situations, state funding
mechanisms, new provisions for parent and general education teacher participation,
and Individual Education Program (IEP) team membership and content. The revised
law calls for a more educationally relevant IEP, an IEP that is more responsive to
educational context.
IDEA'97 provides language that impacts the assessment and eligibility determination
for all students who are suspected of having a disability. A child may not be determined
to be eligible for special education or a child with a disability [Determination of Eligibility:
300.534 (b) (1) (i, ii)]1 if the determinant factor for that eligibility determination is:
1. Lack of instruction in reading or math; or
2. Limited English proficiency ; and
3. The child does not otherwise meet the eligibility standards under 300.7(a) [Child
with a Disability].
IDEA'97 addresses the evaluation and assessment of all students [Determination of
Needed Evaluation Data 300.533(a)(a)(i-iii)] in requiring the assessment and
alignment of core curriculum using research-based instructional strategies that are
student focused. This would include review of existing evaluation data on the child,
including:
Federal and state special education laws and regulations mandate that public school
systems evaluate and, when appropriate, provide special education services to children
whose educational performance is adversely affected by the identified disability(s). The
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act includes visual impairments that adversely
affect educational performance as types of disabilities requiring special education and
Throughout this document all references indicated within brackets [ ] refer to sections from the Individuals with Disabilities
Education Act (IDEA).
TN Guidelines Visual Impairment-2003
related services. If the student 2 has difficulties that do not "adversely impact the child's
educational performance"; the student is not eligible for services under IDEA.
Regulations from IDEA'97 specifically require IEP teams to address and document
"adverse affects" of the identified disability in the child's general education curriculum.
These regulations have made a significant impact in many school districts with the
increased use and application of federal requirements of Section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973. Section 504 is a civil rights statute which provides that: "No
otherwise qualified individual with handicaps in the United Statesshall, solely by
reason of his/her handicap, be excluded from the participation in, be denied the
benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving
federal financial assistance." (29 USC 794) The provisions of Title II of the American
Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) and Section 504 are similar in nature, although
interpreted consistently. When a child meets IDEA/state standards for identification as
visually impaired, and "adverse affects" cannot be demonstrated, accommodations in
the general education classroom should be developed through a Section 504 Service
Plan by the Section 504 Review Committee.
Major emphasis was placed on the inclusion of all students with disabilities in the
general education curriculum, including participation of all students in mandated
statewide or district-wide assessments. IDEA'97 addressed these requirements
[Participation in Assessments 300.138] in stating:
"The State must have on file with the Secretary information to demonstrate that
(a) Children with disabilities are included in general State and district-wide assessment
programs, with appropriate accommodations and modifications in administration, if
necessary;
(b) As appropriate, the State or LEA (1) Develops and implements guidelines for the participation of children with
disabilities in alternate assessments for those children who cannot participate in
State and district-wide assessment programs;
(2) Develops alternate assessments in accordance with paragraph (b)(1) of this
section; and
(3) Beginning not later than, July 1, 2000, conducts the alternate assessments
described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section."
Consequently, specific accommodations have been developed and, as research-based
information becomes available, continue to be revised that can address this need for
students with a visual impairment. Significant progress has been made since the
reauthorization of IDEA in 1997 for including students with visual impairments in largescale assessments mandated at both district and state levels. Although there continue
to be barriers and issues regarding statewide assessment that have not yet been
resolved for students with visual impairments, the inclusion of all students in statewide
2
The words, student and child, and the terms visual impairment and visual disability are used interchangeably
throughout this document, and should be read with the same intent or meaning.
TN Guidelines Visual Impairment-2003
assessments will continue to be an evolving process, with focus on equitable and fair
assessment of all students.
Legislation specific to the assessment of students suspected of a visual impairment is
significant with this reauthorization. Under Development, Review, and Revision of IEP
[300.346 (a)(2)(i-v)--Consideration of Special Factors], there are factors for
consideration by all IEP Teams for any student with a disability, including:
(iii)
"In the case of a child who is blind or visually impaired, provide for
instruction in braille and the use of braille unless the IEP team determines,
after an evaluation of the child's reading and writing skills, needs, and
appropriate reading and writing media (including an evaluation of the child's
future needs for instruction in braille or the use of braille), that instruction in
braille or the use of braille is not appropriate for the child."
Other IDEA'97 language specifically pertaining to students with visual impairments may
be found in the section of IDEA'97 that describes Related Services [300.24 (b)(6)],
including:
(6) "Orientation and mobility services
(i) Means services provided to blind or visually impaired students by qualified
personnel to enable those students to attain systematic orientation to and
safe movement within their environments in school, home, and community;
and
(ii) Includes teaching students the following, as appropriate:
(A) Spatial and environmental concepts and use of information received by
the senses (such as sound, temperature and vibrations) to establish,
maintain, or regain orientation and line of travel (e.g., using sound at a
traffic light to cross the street);
(B) To use the long cane to supplement visual travel skills or as a tool for
safely negotiating the environment for students with no available travel
vision;
(C) To understand and use remaining vision and distance low vision aids;
and
(D) Other concepts, techniques, and tools."
The intent of this document is to help teachers of students with visual impairments and
administrators of programs serving students with visual impairments to operate within
the school improvement process therein, supporting the spirit and intent of the
reauthorization of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and regulations through
quality practices. This document will support teachers of students with visual
impairments as they "align curriculum and assessment and use research-based
instructional strategies that are student focused." Other audiences for this document
are special education administrators, school psychologists, parents, medical eye
TN Guidelines Visual Impairment-2003
specialists, and other school staff. This document is written to guide professionals in
education through a problem solving process, which begins with general education
interventions and continues through initial evaluations, services, and transition into the
community.
Registration 3, referral for rehabilitation services, Supplemental Security Income, and
income tax exemption. A person determined to be "legally blind" may have functional
vision and may be a print reader or a braille and print reader. Students who are legally
blind and not able to use print as a reading medium may require braille, recorded
materials, and/or tactile and auditory materials as components of their educational
program.
The student with low vision may be able to use print as the primary educational
medium, even though adaptations may be necessary. The student with low vision has
a visual acuity ranging from 20/50 or less in the better eye with best correction or a
remaining field of vision of 60 degrees or less. In the case of a student with a vision
problem and one or more additional disabling conditions, the vision problem may be
considered the primary or the secondary disability.
The teacher of students with visual impairments must determine if learning problems
are caused by visual disabilities as defined in Tennessees eligibility standards and can
be remediated using methods and adaptations for students with visual impairments, or
if the learning problems are caused by visual perceptual problems. If visual acuity has
been ruled out as the problem, the assessment team should refer the student for a
psychological evaluation and/or to a teacher who specializes in learning disabilities.
These specialists can make recommendations for methods and adaptations for
students with visual perceptual problems. At this time, best practices involve
remediation of specific skills, teaching compensatory strategies, and providing
appropriate accommodations (Silver, 2001).
The American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Academy of Ophthalmology,
issued the following statement in 1998 as a rebuttal for the claims of some optometrists
and ophthalmologists: There is no peripheral eye defect that produces dyslexia and
associated learning disabilities. Eye defects do not cause reversal of letters, words or
numbersno known scientific evidence supports the claims for improving the
academic abilities of dyslexic or learning disabled children with treatment based on
visual training, including muscle exercises, ocular pursuit, or tracking exercises, or
glasses (with or without bifocals or prism) pp. 197-198 Ingersoll & Goldstein, 1993.
There are many controversial therapies (e.g., scotopic sensitivity and optometric visual
training) or diagnoses such as convergent insufficiency, currently being used in the
3
Congress enacted the Federal Act to Promote the Education of the Blind in 1879. This act is a means for providing adapted
educational materials to eligible students who meet the definition of legal blindness. An annual registration of eligible students
determines a per capita amount of money designated for the purchase of educational materials produced by the American
Printing House for the Blind (APH). These funds are credited to Federal Quota accounts that are maintained and administered
by APH and its Ex Officio Trustees throughout the country.
TN Guidelines Visual Impairment-2003
10
TENNESSEES DEFINITION/STANDARDS
Section 2
1. Definition
State Board of Education Rule 0520-1-9-.01 (15) (p) Disabilities
(b)
3. Evaluation Procedures
a. Evaluation shall include the following:
(1) evaluation by an ophthalmologist or optometrist, which documents the eye
condition with the best possible correction;
(2) a written functional vision and media assessment, completed or compiled by
a licensed teacher of students with visual impairments, which includes:
(a) observation of visual behaviors at school, home, or other environments;
(b) educational implications of eye condition based upon information
received from eye report;
(c) assessment and/or screening of expanded core curriculum skills
(orientation and mobility, social interaction, visual efficiency, independent
living, recreation and leisure, career education, assistive technology, and
compensatory skills) as well as an evaluation of the childs reading and
11
writing skills, needs, appropriate reading and writing media, and current
and future needs for braille;
(d) school history and levels of educational performance; and
(e) documentation and assessment of how visual impairment adversely
affects educational performance in the classroom or learning
environment.
4. Evaluation Participants
a. Information shall be gathered from the following persons in the evaluation of
visual impairment:
(1) the parent/guardian of the child;
(2) an ophthalmologist or optometrist;
(3) licensed teacher of students with visual impairments;
(4) a general education classroom teacher; and
(5) other professional personnel, as needed: (e.g., low vision specialist,
orientation and mobility instructor, school psychologist).
12
Rulemaking Hearing Rules of the State Board of Education, Special Education Programs and Services, Chapter 0520-1-9
(3) Referral, Initial Evaluation, and Reevaluation
TN Guidelines Visual Impairment-2003
13
A flowchart is included on the following page to clarify the steps and offer a suggested
sequence for evaluating students suspected of having a visual impairment.
(Step 1) When a concern has been expressed regarding a childs vision, the parent is
contacted for information about the childs prior history of eye conditions and treatment
by eye care specialists. The referral process is explained and a copy of Rights of
Children with Disabilities and Parent Responsibilities is provided to the parents.
(Step 2a) Most parents are aware when they have a child who is visually impaired and
will have obtained appropriate eye care for their child. However, if a visual impairment
is suspected and an eye doctor has not seen the child, the parent(s) needs to schedule
a medical eye examination by an eye doctor.
(Step 2b) In either case, an eye report needs to be completed by the eye specialist
and returned to the childs school or the teacher of students with visual impairments
(TVI).
(Step 3) Once an eye report is obtained, the TVI reviews the report and determines
whether the student meets the standards for eligibility as a student with a visual
impairment.
(Step 4) If eligibility standards are not met, appropriate documentation procedures are
to be followed, and the parent and school staff are informed.
(Step 5) If the student meets the eligibility standards for visual impairment as visually
impaired, referral for a comprehensive visual evaluation is made.
(Step 6) The IEP chairperson contacts the parents and explains the evaluation
process, specifies who will evaluate their child, and identifies types of assessments to
be administered. Written parental consent to conduct the evaluation is obtained and a
prior written notice explaining this decision is provided to the parents.
(Step 7) The functional vision and media assessment and educational evaluation is
completed by the TVI, which includes input from the parents and teachers.
(Step 8) An IEP meeting is held:
a. to determine whether or not the child is eligible for special education services as
visually impaired because state disability standards are met and the students
needs cannot be met in the general education program, and
b. if eligible, to develop an Individualized Education Program (IEP) based on the
identified needs of the student.
14
FLOWCHART
SEQUENCE FOR EVALUATING STUDENTS SUSPECTED OF HAVING A VISUAL IMPAIRMENT
Step 1
Suspected Vision Problem:
Contact ParentsMedical Vision Records
Provide and Explain Rights
Step 2a
If no Medical Vision Records Available,
Parents Schedule Vision Examination
with Eye Doctor
Step 2b
Eye Report Completed by Eye
SpecialistReturned to School or to
the TVI
Step 3
TVI Reviews Eye Report:
Determines if Standards as VI
Have been met
Step 4
If VI Standards Not Met:
Information DocumentedParents and School Staff InformedReferral Process Complete
Step 5
If VI Standards Met:
Referral Made for Comprehensive
Visual Evaluation
Step 6
IEP Chairperson Contacts Parents to:
Obtain Informed Parental Consent
Explain Assessment Procedures
Provide Prior Written Notice
Step 7
TVI Completes
Obtains Information from Parents and Teachers
Educational Evaluation
Functional Vision and Media Assessment
Step 8
IEP Team Meeting Held to Consider Eligibility of Student:
DetermineChild with a Visual Impairment
Determine Need for Special Education Services
Step 5
15
If VI Standards
Met:
Referral Made for
Comprehensive
The form should be returned to the students school or to the TVI. If more information
or clarification is needed, the TVI may contact the eye doctor. The medical information
will assist the TVI in determining what formal and informal assessments will need to be
conducted.
16
The teacher of visual impairments should compile a summary of the students school
history specific to the visual impairment, including:
when vision needs were first identified
when and which services were initiated
service level provided in successive grades and placements (direct, consultation,
collaborative)
special skills addressed (orientation and mobility, keyboarding, braille instruction,
etc.)
interruptions of continuity in services, such as due to protracted school absences
medical information pertaining to changes in vision
changes or addition of learning media, e.g., braille or auditory accommodations
The present levels of performance on basic skills in reading, math, and writing are key
to providing information for the Functional Vision Assessment and in developing the
IEP. Assessments may be either criterion-referenced, comparing skills to mastery of
specific performance indicators, or norm-referenced, comparing individual performance
to that of a national or state sample. Some of these assessments are group
administered, while others are individually administered.
The State Board of Education has approved Curriculum Standards that have been
identified by the Tennessee Division of Curriculum and Instruction of the Department of
Education for content areas across the curriculum and for each grade level. These
standards are detailed on the state website and updated as necessary. These
standards identify performance indicators and serve as criterion referenced indicators
of achievement and are used in structuring course content.
Four of these curricular areas have been identified for testing:
Mathematics
Science
Social studies
The Tennessee Comprehensive Assessment Program (TCAP) has been developed for
monitoring and tracking student progress in these curricular areas. The normTN Guidelines Visual Impairment-2003
17
referenced information from the TCAP Achievement Tests, TCAP Competency Test, the
End of Course Test, and the Gateway Tests compare the performance of students with
visual impairments with that of the normally sighted peers. The TCAP-Alt: PA (Portfolio
Assessment) and TCAP-Alt: ASA (Academic Skills Assessment) provide a method for
assessing progress in the four curriculum areas. More detailed information on statewide
assessments, accommodations and the alternate assessment can be found in Section
6 of this manual.
The utility of norm-referenced tests for exceptional students has been questioned (M.
Frase-Blunt, 2000), as have issues in the adaptability of such tests for students with
visual impairments (Allman, 2000). For example, specific questions have been raised
among educators of students with visual impairments regarding adapting and
interpreting the extensive graphic illustrations in these tests.
The impact of testing accommodations, which provide access to testing, has not been
fully determined. Detailed information from the TVI about the test accommodations is
needed for any accurate administration and interpretation of test results. (See Section
6: Accommodations for Statewide Assessment).
Additional and more meaningful assessment, beyond state mandated tests, may be
required to determine the students present skill levels. A listing of tests for determining
reading levels for normally sighted students has been compiled for Tennessee and is
available as part of the English/Language Arts Standards.
Locating tests that have been transcribed into braille may be facilitated through the
Tennessee Instructional Resource Center for Visually Impairments (TRCVI) and LOUIE
database of the American Printing House for the Blind (Appendix C). Even with the
provision of tests in braille, the TVI should be aware that not all tests may be
appropriately adapted and transcribed into braille. Some tests may arrive with omitted
items and without adjusted information for test interpretation. Even if a tactual item is
provided in lieu of a print diagram or picture, it may not be a valid measure of mastery
or a reliable test indicator. Large print tests that have been produced by photo
enlargement of the regular print test (which is the typical procedure for production of
tests in large print) may have sections where the font is smaller than large print. The
TVI should be alert to the font size of fractions, diagrams, and dictionary or glossary
sections.
Assessment of students with visual impairments with additional disabilities is an
intricate task. A variety of professionals with a broad knowledge of curriculum and
cognitive benchmarks and experience with students with visual impairments with a wide
range of skill levels may be required for an accurate measure of the students abilities.
(Section 7: Consideration of Other Disabilities). Tests that have been found useful for
students with visual impairments are available through the Products Catalog of the
American Printing House for the Blind. Some have specific norms for students using
braille or large print.
TN Guidelines Visual Impairment-2003
18
A Compendium of Instruments for Assessing the Skills and Interest of Individuals with
Visual Impairment or Multiple Disabilities is available from Lighthouse International
(Benoff, Lang, and Beck-Visola, 2001). This listing can serve as a reference for direct
use by the TVI or as a resource for school personnel responsible for assessment.
19
make the TVI aware of concerns and other valuable information for the assessment
report. Informal assessments should include observations, interviews and informal
activities with the student. Informal techniques may be the most reliable method for
obtaining information from students with multiple disabilities. These activities may
include tasks such as writing, cutting, sorting, or other tasks based on concerns
reported by the classroom teacher, parent or other staff who work with the student.
Following are suggestions for completing observations:
During the Functional Vision Assessment, the TVI should observe and document:
20
Students diagnosed with the same visual impairment, visual acuity, and/or field
restrictions may function very differently from one another in their daily activities. The
TVI should remember that usable vision can fluctuate due to health, medications,
lighting, fatigue, motivation, or stress. This fluctuation may greatly affect the students
functioning and must be assessed and monitored regularly by the TVI.
21
VISION CONSIDERATIONS
Reading Rate
Writing
Legibility to others
Ability to read own handwriting
Ability to make corrections
Rate and stamina
Keyboarding skills
Basic writing skills for grammar, punctuation, capitalization,
spelling, and organization
22
The LMA is unique for each student. For some, additional information may be derived
from a clinical low vision evaluation and training with prescribed optical vision devices.
(See Low Vision Assessment) For others, academic delays, which have been attributed
to the students visual impairment, may warrant additional testing to determine if there
are learning problems beyond those attributed to the visual impairment. Students who
have a significant cognitive impairment, in addition to their visual impairment, may rely
primarily on listening and auditory skills, with braille or print literacy skills being
employed as auxiliary learning media. (See Section 7: Considerations of Other
Disabilities)
If it is determined to add braille as a learning medium for a student who has exclusively
used print, several new instructional components must be addressed. First, adequate
instructional time with the licensed TVI should be made in the school day for the time
required to introduce the Literary Braille Code and learn to read with braille at a level of
proficiency (Hicks and Barron, 1995). Short daily lessons are more effective than
longer sessions provided two or three times per week. The new braille user must
develop tactual skills as well as learning the 189 contractions and short-form words
which are represented by the 63 arrangements of the six braille dots 5 (Braille Authority
of North America, 1994). For braille to become a useful learning medium, rather than a
smattering of braille knowledge, priority in the instructional day will be required.
Second, the instructional challenge of providing a student with braille as an additional
learning medium should be undertaken by a licensed TVI with firm knowledge of both
the Literary Braille Code and the Nemeth Code of Mathematics and Scientific
Notations. Resources for the teacher about instructional strategies for students adding
braille as a learning medium may be found in Communications Skills for Visually
Impaired Learners (Harley, Truan, & Sanford, 1996) and in Foundations of Education
(Koenig, A. J., & Holbrook, M. C. (2000). Other resources include the American
Foundation for the Blind, the American Printing House for the Blind, the Texas School
for the Blind and Visually Impaired, and the Tennessee School for the Blind.
Third, the instructional strategy for adding braille as a learning medium will differ
according to the student's reading fluency, basic math skills, and knowledge or writing
skills. Therefore, the TVI should gather information to determine these levels.
Braille Authority of North America. (1994). English Braille American Edition, 1994. Louisville, KY: American Printing House for
the Blind.
23
codified. Students who already have reading skills at a third grade level or above may
focus on acquiring the knowledge of the code as quickly as possible by applying
reading and writing literacy already acquired in print. Braille math skills can be
introduced into the student's current math curriculum without requiring such a volume of
new braille symbols, and instruction may make use of a talking calculator to transfer the
student's existing math skills though braille and listening.
The building of braille speed and accuracy for these students, who are already readers,
is enhanced when new braille skills are integrated into school subjects. For example,
the student may begin to write answers for multiple choice tests in braille, using justlearned alphabet letters and numbers. Using new braille skills for a list of spelling or
vocabulary words will allow braille to become functional in the classroom before braille
punctuation or code rules are mastered. Two of the handful of manuals or instructional
sequences that have been designed to teach the Literary Braille Code, have been
primarily used with school-age students. These are Braille Too (Hepker and CrossCoquillette, 1995) and Braille Connection: A Braille Reading and Writing Program for
Former Print Users (Caton, Pester, and Bradley, 1990.)
24
Whether the student learning braille is a fluent reader or a beginning reader, listening is
a major learning medium for all students with visual impairments. Students may need
specific instruction to build listening comprehension skills and acquire skills in
manipulating listening equipment (changing speed and pitch), securing recorded
information, and selecting which medium to use efficiently for specific tasks.
Maximizing listening skills becomes especially important for students who have recently
lost vision or cognition and no longer can rely on established reading skills.
It is important to secure adequate reading materials in the appropriate media. There
are numerous sources of textbooks in braille, large print materials, and recorded media
(see resource listing in Appendix C).
LOUIE: An online database, maintained by the American Printing House for the
Blind, of textbooks which are accessible in braille, large print, or recorded form from
participating producers across the country.
The National Library Service for the Blind and Physically Handicapped of the
Library of Congress: Loans registered patrons recreational reading in braille, large
print, or recorded form including the equipment to access the recorded books and
electronic books which may be downloaded in braille.
Recording for the Blind and Dyslexic: Has recorded textbooks for registered
subscribers. This organization will also record texts that have not as yet been
recorded.
The LMA will provide information for the IEP Team, which is charged with the
responsibility of determining the learning media. Specific instructional objectives and a
schedule for implementing the objectives may then be developed. The goal is to
enable the student with a visual impairment to develop independent learning skills and
to use media, whether print, braille, recordings or a combination of these media as tools
in all subjects.
25
students disability is such that academic needs cannot be met through the general
educational program (including a Section 504 Implementation Plan), and that the
students progress would be adversely affected without specific curriculum additions,
modifications and instructional strategies to meet those needs. The information
obtained through the Functional Vision and Media Assessment will lead directly to the
development of an IEP including goals and instructional objectives to meet the
student's learning based on documented visual needs. It is not necessary that a child
experience failure in school before adverse affects can be demonstrated. According to
federal legislation and IDEA eligibility for special education services, an impairment is
considered a disability when:
After the IEP Team has determined that the student meets the eligibility standards,
including the documentation of adverse affects, that decision will be documented as
part of the Eligibility Report for special education services. Adverse affects will be
unique for each student as identified through the Functional Vision and Learning Media
Assessment. Determination of adverse affects for students who meet the standards for
a visual impairment should consider:
Need for Braille
Expanded Core Curriculum and Needs
Access to Specialized Instruction
Access to Specialized Materials
Necessary Classroom Accommodations
26
Upon the completion of the medical evaluation, the Functional Vision and Learning
Media Assessment, and the observations of visual behaviors, the TVI should document
the implications of the visual impairment upon the educational needs of the child. Both
immediate needs and long term needs should be considered. The TVI needs to include
in the educational implications as much data as possible to enable the team developing
the educational program to make informed educational decisions regarding the student.
27
Visual Attention: Students may not respond to visual stimuli due to neurological
damage. They may need to be taught to use their remaining senses. Students with
inconsistent responses to visual stimuli and poor fixation skills may benefit from
specific visual skills training and environmental adaptations.
Convergence: Students who have convergence problems (inability of the two eyes
to bring their visual axes to focus on a near object) may have eye fatigue from
reading and near vision activities. Frequent rest periods may be needed, and more
emphasis on listening activities may be required.
Eye Movements: Poor eye movements (shift of gaze, scanning, and ocular pursuit)
can be the result of a variety of conditions. This may cause the student to exhibit
more head movements, and to read slower than normal. Training in systematic eye
movements may be appropriate for some students.
Eye Dominance: Students with mixed dominance (e.g. left-handed and right-eyed
dominant) may have difficulties with activities that require them to line up a target
with their dominant eye. The TVI may recommend seating and placement of
materials that would accommodate a strong/better eye preference.
Peripheral Field of Vision: Traveling can be adversely affected by limitations in the
visual field. Students may need to be taught to move their heads and scan before
moving across an area. The physical education teacher should be advised of the
need to modify activities due to the students peripheral field limitations.
Color Discrimination: The classroom teacher may need to be made aware of
students with color deficiency. Modifications of activities may include: providing
good lighting, using bright, contrasting colors, labeling crayons and avoiding colorcoded texts, graphs and diagrams. Activities such as labeling clothing and learning
how to interpret traffic lights and signs may also be needed.
Light Sensitivity and Preference: Some students perform better in dim light (e.g.,
children with albinism) and some perform better in bright light (e.g., children with
optic atrophy and optic nerve hypoplasia). The lighting requirements may be noted
on the eye doctors report. Generally, students should not face windows or glare.
Some students may need to be seated away from windows, and some may need a
desk lamp for additional lighting.
Visual Perception Skills
Assessment of visual perception skills is appropriate for preschool and primary level
students who have not learned to read or write or students with multiple impairments
causing cognitive delays. Such skills as visual discrimination, visual memory, figureground perception, eye-hand coordination, visual closure and visual sequencing may
28
need to be provided by the TVI using a developmental vision curriculum, e.g., Program
to Develop Visual Efficiency and Visual Functioning (Barraga & Morris, 1980).
Near Vision
Students with limited near visual discrimination skills may need to be taught by pairing
tactual learning with near vision activities. Systematic search patterns with extra time
for locating objects may be necessary. Sometimes tactual learning may need to be
considered as the primary learning mode.
Learning Media
Current Print Functioning: A number of factors can affect a students print
functioning such as near visual acuity, age of onset, cause of impairment, parental
expectations, experience with printed materials and concept development.
Students who have the same visual acuity and eye condition may differ greatly in
their ability to use printed materials. The TVI should consult with the regular
classroom teacher and parents in recommending the media of instruction and
learning. Some students may be able to read regular print, some may need a low
vision device, some may prefer large print, some may need to rely on listening, and
some may rely on tactile or braille materials. Other students may find that
combinations of these media work best for them in their instructional programs.
Writing Functioning: Using adaptive materials such as bold-lined paper may help
students who have difficulty in copying print. Assignments may need to be
shortened or additional time may be needed to enable the student to complete
writing activities. Alternative methods of responding, such as multiple choice or
word banks, rather than writing answers fully, may be used to shorten the writing
task. Systematic instruction in handwriting, and keyboarding may be required for
the student with low vision.
Depth Perception
Students with depth perception problems may need special instruction to help in the
development of eye-hand or eye-foot coordination and in recognition of objects at a
distance. The TVI should consult with the physical education teacher and suggest
modifications as needed.
Distant Vision
Distant Visual Discrimination: Students who have difficulty with distant visual
discrimination may need preferential seating or positioning for viewing classroom
activities such as experiments and demonstrations. Chalkboard activities, overhead
projection and map reading may require preferential seating for students with
limited distant vision. The TVI may need to recommend that the student be given
copies of class notes. The classroom teacher may be asked to verbalize everything
29
written on the chalkboard. The TVI may need to consult with the classroom teacher
on ways to make viewing most meaningful.
Orientation and Mobility: Orientation and mobility skills may be noted throughout the
functional vision assessment process. Special instruction may be needed in
trailing, protective and search techniques, and in familiarizing the student with
common areas of the school building. A thorough evaluation of orientation and
mobility may be needed.
30
31
Living independently requires that students with low vision and blindness learn how to
function independently.
Independent living skills range from basic personal
management skills to total independent living skills. Examples may include brushing
teeth and toileting to tactually marking a stove or learning how to shop for groceries.
Direct, sequential instruction is often needed for students to learn such skills as cooking
or how to ask for or hire sighted assistants. Independent living also includes use of
resources specific to the needs of students with visual impairments, e.g., where to
purchase or repair an embossed wristwatch.
CAREER EDUCATION
Sighted students learn about jobs and the world of work by observing others perform
and complete tasks. This information is often not available to students with low vision
and blindness. Students with visual impairments are also often at risk of being the
recipients of diminished expectations for them to carry out age-appropriate chores and
tasks. These students need to learn what skills they have or may develop that lead to
employment. Further, these students need to learn about the governmental services
that will provide special training and assistance as well as legislative information
relating to reasonable accommodations that can be made to jobs that will allow them to
become employed. By age 14, a student with low vision or blindness must have an
Individualized Transition Plan (ITP) developed as part of the students Individualized
Education Program (IEP). While career education will be provided throughout the
school years, formal assessments of interests and aptitudes will be needed for the
development of the ITP.
ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY
Assistive technology assessments are conducted by persons who have special
knowledge of low/high technology devices designed for students with low vision and
blindness. Assistive technology devices are not necessarily electronic devices and may
range from something as basic as a book stand or pencil grip (low technology) to a
refreshable braille display (high technology). Although teachers of students with low
vision have general knowledge about many devices, they are expected to learn
32
specifics of devices that are used based on their students needs. For students who
have additional disabilities, assistive technology may include, but is not limited to, such
devices as augmentative communication systems with tactile overlays or a device that
would enable a student who is deaf-blind to communicate with hearing and sighted
students and adults. The need for assistive technology must also be discussed at a
students IEP meeting.
VISUAL EFFICIENCY
Assessments of visual efficiency are conducted by a variety of professionals, each of
whom contributes to the assessment to determine ways in which a student uses
functional vision and how he or she may improve visual efficiency. Starting with an eye
report from the students ophthalmologist or optometrist, the teacher of students with
visual impairments performs a Functional Vision Assessment (FVA). This assessment
describes the students functional vision for various educational tasks. Lighting, spatial
arrangements (e.g., size and distance of objects), contrast, color, and time are among
the variables that are considered for near, intermediate, and distance tasks in different
environments. The FVA is usually performed prior to a clinical low vision evaluation.
An optometrist or ophthalmologist with a low vision specialty performs the clinical low
vision evaluation. This evaluation has two major purposes. First, the evaluation
determines whether a student will benefit from optical devices for accessing standard
print and distance vision tasks. Optical devices include but are not limited to
magnifiers, prisms, monoculars, light absorptive lenses, therapeutic contact lenses, and
closed circuit televisions.
Optical devices are then incorporated into the learning media assessment. In this way,
braille, large print, standard print with optical devices, and other communication media,
e.g., recorded materials and spoken output on a computer, may be considered for
instructional purposes.
The second purpose for the clinical low vision evaluation is for teachers and parents to
better understand how a student is using his or her functional vision. For example, a
student with visual and additional severe disabilities may not be able to respond to
typical eye tests in an ophthalmologist's or optometrists testing procedures that require
verbal or matching abilities. A clinical low vision specialist is better able to describe
such a students visual abilities and work with a TVI and parents to maximize use of
vision for learning.
Once functional and clinical Low Vision Assessments are completed, the teacher uses
this information derived from these assessments to plan instruction to increase visual
efficiency and teach the use of optical devices for purposes of using vision in school
and home environments.
33
34
Does reducing the complexity of the visual image increase recognition ability?
Does the student need copies of items that are on the wall, overhead, or on the
board, etc. or can the student learn to use optical devices prescribed for distance
vision, e.g., a monocular telescope?
2. General Curriculum
The teacher should include all curricular adaptations which are needed to permit the
student to participate successfully in the general curriculum. Certain questions to
consider might include the following:
What adaptations to the general curriculum should be made which will allow the
student to be as independent as possible?
What modified pictures, tactile graphics or even real objects are needed to enable
the student to understand the concepts?
What basic experiences are needed to enable the student to understand the
concepts in the curriculum? The teacher may help develop more accurate concepts
by providing concrete experiences through field trips and bringing materials to the
classroom for the student to explore.
What kinds of materials/instruction are needed to teach the use of tools being used
in the curriculum? (Example: television, movies, computers, experiments, etc.)
What are the impacts of the visual impairment on reading and writing?
What adaptations are needed to enable the student to read and write more
fluently?
What adaptations are needed in working distance, print size, contrast, optical
devices and time?
Does the student need different media for different activities? For example: braille
may be needed in writing, auditory material in reading, print material may be
needed in math.
35
4.
In addition to the academic needs in the general curriculum, expanded core (or unique
needs) curricula should be considered. These needs are necessary because of the
problems encountered due to the visual disability.
Visual Efficiency
Does the student need a clinical low vision evaluation and prescribed optical
device(s)?
Does the student need instruction in the use of the prescribed optical device?
Does the student need training for better utilization of functional vision?
Communication Skills
What are the best strategies for developing listening and writing skills?
What skills in social, recreation and daily living are impacted by the visual
impairment?
What special skills does the student need to participate with peers in social and
recreational activities?
Assistive Technology
What special assistive devices is the student currently using, or which devices may
be needed such as scanners, voice output, writing guides, bold line paper, reading
stands, refreshable braille, books on tape, etc.?
36
Career Education
What independent living skills are needed to prepare the student for post secondary
education and employment?
What are the students assistive technology needs in orientation and mobility?
Several related factors, such as the degree of visual impairment and the age of onset
of the visual impairment, should be kept in mind in attempting to form educational
implications. Other factors to be considered in the educational planning are the
intellectual level, age and experiential background, and adjustment to the general
education curriculum. The type of eye condition is only one among a number of
important factors that should be carefully considered in planning educational programs
for students with visual impairments. For additional information the teacher should
refer to books that have been written in this area such as Visual Impairment in the
Schools (Harley, Lawrence, Sanford & Burnett, 2000).
37
38
ELIGIBILITY GUIDELINES
Section 5
A visual impairment can have a significant impact on a childs ability to keep track of
his/her location in the environment (orientation) and on the ability to travel safely and
efficiently in school and community environments (mobility). Specialized training, or
39
orientation and mobility instruction (O&M), is a related service that addresses the travel
challenges frequently associated with a visual impairment.
Every time an IEP team meets to determine a visual impairment and need for special
education, orientation and mobility instruction must be considered. Each initial
evaluation and reevaluation requires an orientation and mobility screening and/or
evaluation unless the IEP team agrees that they can determine need from existing
data.
All children who are blind or who have low vision need a variety of travel experiences in
order to develop safety skills, travel confidence, and an appreciation for independence.
These experiences also are the building blocks for literacy, social competence and selfesteem. Expectations are based on the age of the student. Age expectations affect
the content of the evaluation, assessment procedures, and subsequent
recommendations.
Local education agencies (LEAs) must ensure that orientation and mobility services are
provided by trained and knowledgeable personnel who meet appropriate state
qualification standards. A licensed teacher of students with visual impairment can
complete an initial screening of a students orientation and mobility needs. However, a
comprehensive evaluation in multiple environments by an orientation and mobility
specialist will assure that individual mobility needs are considered.
The components of a comprehensive evaluation will be different for each child,
because children vary in their needs and potential as independent travelers. The IEP
team will be able to make an accurate determination of need if appropriate information
is provided.
Best practice for conducting an evaluation and obtaining critical
information will consider the following statements and questions.
Students with low vision often need sequential instruction and experiences to learn the
best ways to use their functional vision for travel.
Does the child have mobility needs related to functional use of low vision?
40
How does low vision affect the childs ability to maintain orientation?
Does fluctuating vision affect travel abilities?
Do lighting variables affect the ability to travel safely or independently? Has the
child been evaluated in low light conditions? In glare? At night? While transitioning
between lighting conditions?
Does the child need to learn skills to compensate for the effects of low vision ?
If the child uses a wheelchair, how does low vision affect wheelchair navigation and
the ability to use accessibility options (elevators, power doors, ramps)?
Orientation and mobility skills develop over time. The need for orientation and mobility
instruction may need to be included repeatedly over time in a students IEPs. Safe,
independent travel skills (especially traffic safety skills) cannot be learned in a few
lessons. Community travel skills are acquired and practiced through repeated
exposure and application over a period of years. Orientation and mobility training is
driven by both current and future needs.
41
a regular education class with needed support services provided in that classroom
by an itinerant teacher of students with visual impairments;
a regular education class with needed support services in and outside the
classroom by the itinerant TVI;
a vision resource class with a TVI available to the students for instruction in the
regular education class and in the vision resource class;
a self-contained class in a regular school that provides services that address needs
arising from the students blindness or visual impairments as well as other identified
disabilities, if applicable; and
a special school with a residential component that provides services that address
the full range of the blind or visually impaired students disability-specific needs,
including those arising from other disabilities, if applicable.
42
ALLOWABLE ACCOMMODATIONS
When Allowable State Accommodations are to be used with the TCAP assessment,
documentation of these accommodations is to be attached to the IEP, as all decisions
about accommodations are made through the IEP Team and thus become part of the
student's Individual Education Plan (IEP). If an accommodation is not used throughout
a student's daily educational instruction, it is not advisable to use the allowable
accommodations during assessment. The students IEP Team makes decisions
regarding the use of Allowable Accommodations when considerations are made for the
use of Special Accommodations.
SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS
IEP Teams must complete the State/District-Mandated Assessments section of the IEP
and attach the appropriate Accommodations Addendum for each TCAP Assessment
that will be administered to the student during the school year. The IEP Team will need
to verify the student meets specific requirements before Special Accommodations
may be used. All special accommodations used must be documented on the IEP as a
classroom accommodation that has been used consistently during the school year.
Directions for completing the Special Conditions Accommodations documentation are
provided in Individualized Education Program (IEP) Instructions for State IEP, which
can be found on the Special Forms page of the special education website at:
http://www.tennessee.gov/education/speced/seassessment/.
Special
Education
personnel are responsible for administering Special Accommodations. The IEP Team
determines which of the special conditions is appropriate for the student with a visual
impairment for the specific tests. Students may use multiple accommodations. TCAP
43
tests include achievement, writing, high school subject content mastery, and gateway
assessments.
44
Many students who are identified with a visual impairment will have concomitant
disabilities that impede their progress in acquiring skills through the general education
curriculum. Some of these disabilities may in fact be due to the same genetic or
developmental factor, which contributed to the students identified visual impairment.
Frequently, these additional disabilities are overlooked once the student has been
identified as eligible with a visual impairment. This section provides guidance for
determining when other disabilities may be causing an adverse affect on the students
progress within the general education curriculum, and best practices in the evaluation
of suspected concomitant disabilities.
The determination of visual impairment for a student does not exclude the possibility of
the existence of other disabilities. In fact, of the 15 disabilities utilized in Tennessee
which do not specifically refer to vision, all can exist along with vision impairment or, in
the case of multiple disabilities, subsume vision impairment as a component. These
would include:
Autism
Deafness
Developmental Delay
Emotional Disturbance
Functionally Delayed
Hearing Impairment
Intellectually Gifted
Mental Retardation
Multiple Disabilities
Orthopedic/Physical Impairment
Other Health Impairment
Specific Learning Disabilities
Speech or Language Impairment
Traumatic Brain Injury
In each case, the requirements for determining eligibility for the other educational
disabilities apply as written, with some assessment adaptations necessary, along with
experience in how various functions can be affected by vision limitations.
Assessments that are used to determine the existence of a disability for which a
student may require special services, compare that student to the population of sameage peers as a whole, rather than to an isolated population of students with similar
disabilities. Therefore, it is not appropriate to search for assessment procedures
developed only for individuals with disabilities. Instead, the course of action should be
45
46
APPENDICES
Section 8
47
APPENDIX A
48
An acuity of 20/40 or less in either eye for distance or vision for children grades K
through 3
An acuity of 20/30 or less in either eye for distance or near vision for children
grades 4 through 12
A difference of two lines or more between eyes
It is not necessary for students who have already been identified with visual
impairments to undergo vision screening and/or a referral to an eye specialist.
49
the screening. Results of the final screening should be recorded in the students
cumulative record.
Distance and near vision screening results are usually reported as visual acuity and
represent central field vision. The optimal distance for testing distant visual acuity is
twenty (20) feet. Visual acuity is recorded as a fraction in which the numerator
represents the test distance and the denominator represents the row of letters that can
be read on the chart. For example, acuity of 20/100 indicates that a child reads at 20
feet what the normally seeing child should be able to read from a distance of 100 feet.
50
room as the other areas to be screened, the room must be large enough to
accommodate the screening distance indicated on the chart.
The Snellen Chart is considered to be the most reliable instrument for vision
screening. Unlike the stereoscopic instruments, use of the Snellen Chart is less
likely to result in over-referral due to failure on the screening. If a stereoscopic
instrument is used in the initial screening and a child fails that screening, it would be
beneficial to use the Snellen or a similar instrument for the second screening.
The tests for distance vision will not detect the child with hyperopia or
farsightedness. The Plus Lens Test is a more reliable test to detect hyperopia. The
childs vision is checked using the Snellen Chart or one of the binocular instruments
while wearing plus lenses mounted in a small, inexpensive frame. The plus lenses
are of 2.25 diopters for all ages. If the child can see the 20-foot line at twenty feet
from the chart with both eyes while wearing these lenses, a referral should be
made. Many of the stereoscopic instruments provide their own criteria for screening
with the plus lens test (Harley, Lawrence, Sanford, & Burnett, 2000).
Screening Very Young Children or Children with Multiple Disabilities
Other charts may screen children who are unable to respond to the Snellen Chart
because of developmental level or multiple disabilities. The Snellen E Chart, the
Apple, House, Umbrella test or the Symbols for 10 Feet Chart (Lighthouse
International) may be used. Other materials that may be appropriate are the Lea
materials and the Home Eye Chart (Vision Associations), for screening preschool
children.
A checklist titled Guide to Testing Distance Visual Acuity (Prevent Blindness) is
available in an easy-to-use format. It includes a diagram of room set-up, specific
instructions for preparing the child, and interpretation of test results.
3. Photoscreening
Photoscreening is currently being used by various agencies such as the Lions Eye
Center to detect potential vision problems in pre-literate children, ages six months to
four years. The photoscreener takes two black and white pictures of the eye which
are later evaluated by eye care professionals.
Screening at Near Distance
Near vision screening is typically conducted by one of two methods: screening using
stereoscopic instruments or screening using near vision test cards.
1. Screening using stereoscopic instruments
The same stereoscopic instruments used for distance screening may also be used
to screen for near acuity. While these instruments do tend to over-refer, they do
51
offer some advantages over a hand held chart in that they provide for a constant
illumination and object distance (Harley, Lawrence, Sanford & Burnett, 2000, p.
126).
2. Screening using Near Vision Test Cards
Near vision is commonly tested using one of several reading cards, which are
available from a variety of sources. The reading card is ordinarily held at a distance
of fourteen inches from the eye. The reading distance for low vision children and
illumination should be recorded. Jaeger and point-print denote size, which can be
used in designing educational material. Jaeger thirteen to eighteen point type is
largely used in books for first grade and low vision children (Harley, Lawrence,
Sanford & Burnett, 2000, p. 126). Some examples of reading cards that may be
used include the ETDRS Near Chart (Prevent Blindness America, 1996), Rosebaum
Pocket Vision Screener and the Lighthouse Near Vision Acuity Test. Many of these
cards may be obtained through Prevent Blindness America or Lighthouse
International.
52
Watering eye(s)
Styes or infections
Squinting or frowning
Excessive blinking
Starting Line
20/50
20/40
20/40
20/30
Source:
53
APPENDIX B
Assessment Documentation
Letter to Ophthalmologist or Optometrist
Eye Report for Children with Visual Problems
54
VISUAL IMPAIRMENT
Assessment Documentation
Name of Student: ____________________Grade: _____Date of Birth: __________Age: ______
School System: _________________________School: ________________________________
1. A licensed teacher of students with Visual Impairments conducted a written functional vision
Central visual acuity in the better eye or both eyes with best possible correction of 20/50 or
less
Reduced visual field of 60 degrees or less with both eyes.
Medical and educational documentation of progressive loss of vision, which may in the
future, affect the student's ability to learn visually,
Other visual impairment(s), not perceptual in nature, resulting from a medically documented
condition.
Explain or reference data findings: ______________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
4. An orientation and mobility screening and/or evaluation was conducted to determine if there
55
Date: ________________________
Dear Ophthalmologist or Optometrist:
The State of Tennessee, Department of Education, is making every effort to identify and provide
special education services to students across Tennessee who have visual impairments which affect
their ability to perform efficiently in the general education classroom. According to the Tennessee
Department of Education Administrative Policies and Procedures, a student must have a visual
impairment and one of the following characteristics to be eligible to receive special services, which
would allow a licensed teacher of students with visual impairments to work with him/her:
1. Visual acuity in the better eye or both eyes with best possible correction:
a) Legal blindness20/200 or less at distance and/or near
b) Low vision20/50 or less at distance and/or near
2. Visual field restriction with both eyes:
a) Legal blindnessremaining visual field of 20 degrees or less
b) Low visionremaining visual field of 60 degrees or less;
3. Medical and educational documentation of progressive loss of vision, which may in the
future, affect the students ability to learn visually, or
4. Other visual impairment, not perceptual in nature, resulting from a medically documented
condition.
A complete eye report is required in order to document any or all visual problems which might
identify the child as having a visual impairment. Please return the Eye Report form to the address
provided below. Thank you for your assistance with this request.
Sincerely,
____________________________________
(Name)
________________________
________________________
________________________
________________________
____________________________________
(Position)
Telephone ___________________________
56
HISTORY
A. Probable age at onset of vision impairment. Right eye (O.D.) ________________ Left eye (O.S.) _________________
B. Severe ocular infections, injuries, operations, if any, with age at time of occurrence. _______________________________
C. Has pupils ocular condition occurred in any blood relative(s)? ____________ If so, what relationship? ________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
II.
MEASUREMENTS (See back of form for preferred notation for recording visual acuity and table of approximate equivalents)
A. Visual Acuity
Distant Vision
Near Vision
Prescription
Without With Best With Low
Without
With Best With Low
Correction Correction Vision Aid
Correction Correction Vision Aid
Sph.
Cyl
Asia
III.
_______ _______
_______
_______ _______
_______
_______ _______
_______
B.
If glasses are to be worn, were safety lenses prescribed in: Plastic Tempered glass With ordinary lenses
C.
If low vision aid is prescribed, specify type and recommendation for use: ________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
D.
FIELD OF VISION: Is there a limitation? Yes No If so, record results of test on chart on back of form
What is the widest diameter (in degrees) of remaining visual field? O.D. ________________ O.S. ___________________
E.
Is there impaired color perception? Yes No If so, for what color(s)? ______________________________________
C.
O.D. ______________________________________________________
O.S. ______________________________________________________
O.D. _____________________________________________________
O.S. ______________________________________________________
O.D. ______________________________________________________
O.S. ______________________________________________________
C.
D.
Glasses:
E.
F.
G.
Not needed To be worn constantly For close work only Other (specify) ________________________
57
Page 2 of 2
DISTANCE VISION: Use Snellen notation with test distance of 20 feet. (Examples: 20/100, 20/60).
For acuities less than 20/200, record distance at which 200 foot letter can be recognized as numerator
or fraction and 200 as denominator. (Examples: 10/200, 3/200). If the 200-foot letter is not recognized
at 1 foot, record abbreviations for best distant vision as follows:
HM HAND MOVEMENTS
PLL PERCEIVES AND LOCALIZES LIGHT IN ONE OR MORE QUADRANTS
LP
PERCEIVES BUT DOES NOT LOCALIZE LIGHT
No LP LO LIGHT PERCEPTION
NEAR VISION: Use standard A.M.A. notation and specify best distance at which pupil can read.
(Example: 14 70 at 5 in.)
% Central Visual
Efficiency for Near
Point
Distant Snellen
A.M.A.
Jaeger
Metric
20/20 (ft.)
14./14. (in.)
0.37(M.)
100
20/30
14/21
0.50
95
Want ads
20/40
14/28
0.75
90
Telephone directory
20/50
14/35
0.87
50
Newspaper directory
20/60
14/42
1.00
40
20/80
14/56
10
1.50
20
12
20/100
14/70
11
1.75
15
14
20/120
14/84
12
2.00
10
18
20/200
14/140
17
3.50
24
12.5/200
14/224
19
6.00
1.5
8/200
14/336
20
8.00
1.0
5/200
14/560
3/200
14/900
58
APPENDIX C
RESOURCES
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
NOAH
National Organization for Albinism and Hypopigmentation
P.O. Box 959
East Hampstead, NH 03826-0959
Tel: (603) 887-2310 or 1-800-473-2310
Fax: (603) 887-6049
Web: www.albinism.org
Volunteer organization for persons and families involved with the condition of
albinism.
OUTREACH PROGRAM
Vanderbilt Pediatric Ophthalmology Department
Tennessee Lions Eye Center
1211 21st Avenue South, 110B-Medical Arts Building
Nashville, TN 37212
Tel: (615) 936-2726
Free photoscreening for children 1 through 5 years (12 months to 72 months) are
provided for Daycare Centers, Head Start, Church, Mothers Day Out programs,
Business, Home Day Care, etc. Screening requires parental consent. Screening
can be scheduled upon request by phone. Open screenings can be scheduled upon
request with very strict guidelines (Prevent Blindness Tennessee Vision Resource
Guide, 1998).
PREVENT BLINDNESS TENNESSEE
95 White Bridge Road
Suite 513
Nashville, TN 37205
Prevent Blindness Tennessee trains volunteers to conduct vision screening through
the state. Will also conduct vision screenings for systems without other personnel or
agencies to do so.
PROJECT P.A.V.E.
P.O. Box 328
Peabody College, Vanderbilt University
Nashville, TN 37203
Tel: (615) 322-2249, (615) 343-8783, or (615) 322-2249
Provides low vision evaluations, optical aids, and conferences at no charge.
66
67
68
69
70
71
APPENDIX D
REFERENCES
72
REFERENCES
Allman, C., (2000). Guidelines for providing state assessments for alternative formats for
students with visual impairments. Howe's Now, 5, 16-18.
Anderson, S., Boigon, S. & Davis, K. (1991). The Oregon Project for Visually Impaired &
Blind Preschool Children. Medford, OR: Jackson Educational Service District.
APH Products Catalog (arranged in categories for the Expanded Core Curriculum) may be
found at http://www.aph.org/
Barraga, N. C., & Morris, J. E. (1980). Program to Develop Efficiency in Visual Functioning.
American Printing House for the Blind, Louisville, KY.
Benoff, K., Lang, M. A., Beck-Visola, M. (2001). Compendium of instruments for assessing
the skills and interests of individuals with visual impairments or multiple disabilities, New
Your: Lighthouse International. http://www.lighthouse.org/
Brigance, A.H. (1983). Comprehensive Inventory of Basic Skills. Billerica, MA: Curriculum
Associates.
Brigance, A.H. (1981). Inventory of Early Skills, Billerica, MA. Curriculum Associates.
Brigance, A.H. (1981). Inventory of Essential Skills. Billerica, MA: Curriculum Associates.
Caton, H., Pester, E., & Bradley, E. J. (1982). Patterns: The primary braille reading
programs. Louisville, KY: American Printing House for the Blind.
Caton, H., Pester, E., & Bradley, E. J. (1990). The braille connection: A braille reading and
writing program for former print users. Louisville, KY: American Printing House for the Blind.
Clevelend, J, Levack, N, Sewell, D, & Toy R. (2001). Braille Fundamentals. Austin, TX:
Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired.
Committee on Children with Disabilities, American Academy of Pediatrics, American
Academy of Ophthalmology, American Association for pediatric Ophthalmology and
Strabismus. (1998). Dyslexia and Vision: A Subject Review. Pediatrics 102:1217-1219.
Dignan, K.C. & Cown, Chrissy. Administrators Toolbox for Visual Impairments: A collection of
resources to support programs for students with visual impairments. Austin, Texas.
http://www.tsbvi.edu/
Frase-Blount, M., (2000). High stakes testing, a mixed blessing for special students. CEC
Today, 7, 1-15.
Harley, R. K., Truan, M. B., & Sanford, L. D. (1996) Communications Skills for Visually
Impaired Learners: Braille, Print, and Listening Skills for Students Who are Visually
Impaired. (2nd ed.). Charles Thomas: Springfield, IL.
Hatlen, P. (1996) The core curriculum for blind and visually impaired students, including
those with additional disabilities. Review, 28, 25-32
TN Guidelines Visual Impairment-2003
73
Hepker, N. L., & Cross-Coquillette, S. (1995). Braille Too: An instructional braille reading and
writing program for secondary students. Cedar Rapids, IA: Grant Wood Area Education
Agency.
Hicks, N.K., and Barron, J. (Eds.). (1995). Caseload Management Formula. Denver, CO:
Colorado Department of Education
Ingersoll, B.D. & Goldstein, S. (1993). Attention deficit disorder and learning disabilities:
Realities, myths, and controversial treatments. New York: Doubleday.
Koenig, A. J. & Holbrook, M. C. (1993). Learning media assessment of students with visual
impairments: A resource guide for teachers. Austin, TX: Texas School for the Blind and
Visually Impaired.
Koenig, A. J. & Holbrook, M. C. (2000). Foundations of Education. (2nd Ed.), New York:
American Foundation for the Blind
Loumiet, R. & Levack, N. (1991). Independent Living A Curriculum for Adaptations for
Students with Visual Impairments, Vol. I: Social Competence. Austin: Texas School for the
Blind and Visually Impaired.
Loumiet, R. & Levack, N. (1991). Independent Living A Curriculum for Adaptations for
Students with Visual Impairments, Vol. II: Self-Care and Maintenance of Personal
Environment.. Austin: Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired.
Loumiet, R. & Levack, N. (1991). Independent Living A Curriculum for Adaptations for
Students with Visual Impairments, Vol. III: Play and Leisure. Austin: Texas School for the
Blind and Visually Impaired.
National Agenda. (1997). Annotated bibliography of curricular materials related to the core
curriculum for students and youths with visual impairments, including those with multiple
disabilities. Austin, TX: Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired. An updated version
may be found at: http://www.tsbvi.edu/
Pogrund, R., Healy, G., Jones, K., Levack, N. & others. (1995). Teaching Age-Appropriate
Purposeful Skills, An Orientation and Mobility Curriculum for Students with Visual
Impairments. Austin: Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired.
Prevent Blindness America (1998).
Childrens basic screening participant guide.
Schaumburg, IL: Prevent Blindness America.
Sanford, L. & Burnett, R. (2002). Expanded Core Curriculum Screening Record (formerly
Unique Educational Needs Screening Record). Nashville: Consultants for the Visually
Impaired.
Sanford, L. & Burnett, R. (2002). Functional Vision and Media Assessment and Report
Form. Nashville: Consultants for the Visually Impaired.
Sanford, L. & Burnett, R. (2000). Functional Vision and Media Assessment for students who
are pre-academic or academic and visually impaired in grades k-12. Hermitage, TN:
Consultants for the Visually Impaired.
74
Sewell, D. (1997). Assessment Kit of Informal Tools for Academic Students with Visual
Impairments, Part 1-Assessment Tools for Teacher Use. Austin: Texas School for the Blind
and Visually Impaired.
Sewell, D. (1997). Assessment Kit of Informal Tools for Academic Students with Visual
Impairments, Part 2-Large Print Reading Assessments for Student Use. Austin: Texas
School for the Blind and Visually Impaired.
Sewell, D. (1997). Assessment Kit of Informal Tools for Academic Students with Visual
Impairments, Part 3-Braille Reading Assessments for Student Use. Austin: Texas School for
the Blind and Visually Impaired.
Spungin, S.J. (Consulting Editor). (2002). When you have a visually impaired student in
your clasroom: A guide for teachers. New York: AFB Press. (A guide for general education
teachers.)
Tennessee Curriculum Standards for Content Areas:
http://www.state.tn.us/education/ci/index.html
Tennessee English/Language Arts Standards: K-3 Assessments:
http://www.state.tn.us/education/ci/cistandards2001/la/cik3readassess.htm
Tennessee State Department of Education/Division of Special Education:
http://www.tennessee.gov/education/speced/
75
76