0% found this document useful (0 votes)
163 views2 pages

Bowker Et Al v. Regeneration Technologies, Inc Et Al - Document No. 15

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT RTI'S RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT. The deadline for defendant RTI to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint is extended to June 18, 2007. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 8, 2007. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2007) 3:2007cv02278 California Northern District Court

Uploaded by

Justia.com
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
163 views2 pages

Bowker Et Al v. Regeneration Technologies, Inc Et Al - Document No. 15

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT RTI'S RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT. The deadline for defendant RTI to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint is extended to June 18, 2007. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 8, 2007. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2007) 3:2007cv02278 California Northern District Court

Uploaded by

Justia.com
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Bowker et al v. Regeneration Technologies, Inc et al Doc.

15
Case 3:07-cv-02278-MMC Document 15 Filed 05/08/2007 Page 1 of 2

1 ROY M. BRISBOIS, State Bar No. 53222


E-mail: [email protected]
2 JOSEPH C. OWENS, State Bar No. 116075
E-mail: [email protected]
3 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP
221 North Figueroa Street, Suite 1200
4 Los Angeles, California 90012-2601
Tel: (213) 250-1800; Fax: (213) 250-7900
5
Attorneys for Defendant REGENERATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
6
7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 SHAWN MARIE BOWKER; MICHAEL ) Case No.: C07 2278 MCC
MURPHY; AND SUZANNE MURPHY, )
12 )
Plaintiffs, ) STIPULATION TO EXTEND
13 ) DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT
vs. ) RTI'S RESPONSE TO
14 ) COMPLAINT AND ORDER
REGENERATION TECHNOLOGIES, ) THEREON
15 INC.; MEDTRONIC; MEDTRONIC, )
INC.; MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR )
16 DANEK U.S.A., INC.; SPINALGRAFT )
TECHNOLOGIES, LLC; BIOMEDICAL )
17 TISSUE SERVICES, LLC; MICHAEL )
MASTROMARINO; JOSEPH NICELLI; )
18 ENLOE MEDICAL CENTER; DALY )
CITY SPINE CARE GROUP; )
19 SPINECARE MEDICAL GROUP, INC.; )
and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, )
20 )
Defendants. )
21 )
22

23 Plaintiffs SHAWN MARIE BOWKER, MICHAEL MURPHY and


24 SUZANNE MURPHY and Defendant REGENERATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
25 ("RTI"), by and through their counsel of record, hereby agree and stipulate that the
26 time deadline for Defendant RTI to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint
27 herein shall be, and shall include, June 18, 2007.
28 ///
4810-8598-5537.1
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT RTI'S RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 3:07-cv-02278-MMC Document 15 Filed 05/08/2007 Page 2 of 2

1 IT IS SO STIPULATED:
2
3 DATED: May , 2007
4 WILCOXEN CALLAHAN MONTGOMERY &
DEACON
5

6
By: /s/_____
7 DAN WILCOXEN
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
8 SHAWN MARIE BOWKER; MICHAEL
MURPHY; AND SUZANNE MURPHY
9
10
11
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP

DATED: May 1, 2007


221 NORTH FIGUEROA STREET, SUITE 1200

12
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012-2601

LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP


13
TELEPHONE (213) 250-1800

14
15
By: /s/
JOSEPH C. OWENS
16 Attorneys for Defendant
REGENERATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
17
18
ORDER
19
Based on the foregoing Stipulation of the parties, the Court hereby orders that
20
the deadline for Defendant RTI to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint
21
herein shall be extended to, and shall include, June 18, 2007.
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23

24
DATED: May 8, 2007
25

26
_____________________________________
27 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
JUDGE
28
4810-8598-5537.1
-2-
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT RTI'S RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT

You might also like