Chapter 20 - Solution Manual
Chapter 20 - Solution Manual
CHAPTER 20
Review Questions
20-1
Assurance services are independent professional services that improve the quality of information,
or its context for decision makers; attestation services are those assurance services that involve
issuing an examination, review or agreed-upon procedures report on subject matter (or an assertion
about the subject matter) that is the responsibility of another party. Assurance services may go
beyond attestation services in that they may involve analyzing data or placing it in a form to
facilitate decision making.
20-2
The statement is incorrect. While it is correct that all attest services are assurance services, some
assurance services are not attest services (e.g., some PrimePlus/ElderCare engagements)
20-3
Assurance services developed as a natural extension of the audit function. Management has
recognized that contracting costs may be reduced in many situations by providing users access to
information that is certified as to its reliability. Developments in information technology also have
fueled the demand for assurance services as users can now have instantaneous access to a broad
range of "on-line" information that may be customized to their needs.
20-4
No. While attestation engagements involve a written report, not all assurance services result in a
written report as any reasonable form of communication is acceptable.
20-5
The three types of attestation engagements outlined in the attestation standards are:
(1) ExaminationAn examination is designed to provide the highest level of assurance that CPAs
providethe same level as an audit of financial statements. When performing an examination,
CPAs select procedures to gather sufficient evidence to allow the issuance of a report with a
positive opinion on whether the subject matter being examined are presented in accordance
with the selected criteria. Sufficient evidence has been obtained when attestation risk is driven
to a low level.
20-1
(2) ReviewA review involves performing limited procedures, such as inquiries and analytical
procedures. In performing a review, the CPAs gather sufficient evidence to drive attestation
risk to a moderate level.
(3) Agreed-upon proceduresAn agreed-upon procedures engagement involves performing
procedures that were agreed-upon with specified users of the report. Reports on agreed-upon
procedures are restricted use reports in that they are intended only for those specified users.
20-6
Agreed-upon procedures engagements result in restricted use reports, whereas examinations and
reviews ordinarily result in general use reports. (However, nothing in the attestation standards
prohibits CPAs from restricting either an examination or a review report.)
20-7
In an attestation engagement the practitioners report either directly on the subject matter or on an
assertion about the subject matter. The subject matter of an attestation engagement may take many
forms, including:
If the practitioner is reporting on an assertion about the subject matter, that written assertion is
presented with the subject matter or in the practitioner's report.
20-8
Suitable criteria are criteria used in preparing information that are objective and permit reasonably
consistent measurement. Criteria are ordinarily suitable when they are developed by regulatory
agencies or other bodies composed of experts that se due process, including exposing the proposed
criteria for public comment. For example, in the case of a financial forecast, the AICPA has
developed such suitable criteria. In financial reporting, GAAP are in essence a set of suitable
criteria but are referred to as a financial reporting framework.
20-9
Attestation risk is the risk that the practitioner will unknowingly fail to appropriately modify their
report on subject matter that is materially misstated. Attestation risk consists of three components
inherent risk, control risk, and detection risk. Inherent risk is the risk that the subject matter is
materially misstated before considering internal control. Control risk is the risk that internal
control will fail to prevent or detect a material misstatement of the subject matter, and detection
risk is the risk that the practitioners procedures will fail to detect a material misstatement of the
subject matter. In an attestation engagement, the practitioners assess inherent and control risks and
design procedures to restrict detection risk to the appropriate level.
20-2
20-10 The statement is correct. A material departure from the suitable criteria during an examination will
result in a qualified or adverse opinion.
20-11 XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language), is an international information format designed
specifically for business information. It assigns all individual disclosure items within business
reports unique electronically readable tags that are mapped to taxonomies. The AICPAs XBRL
Assurance Task Force is in the process of developing guidance that will assist CPAs in public
practice who are requested to provide assurance on XBRL-related documents. The task force is
currently focusing on:
Developing practice guidance that will assist CPAs in applying existing standards to
information reported in XBRL format;
Recommending, where deemed necessary and appropriate, to the appropriate standard
setting bodies changes to existing standards and/or the development of new standards;
and
Collaborating with key stakeholders, including the SEC, PCAOB, various AICPA
groups, and others.
20-12 The statement is not valid. A financial projection presents expected results, given one or more
hypothetical assumptions and its use is restricted to the party with whom the company is
negotiatingfor example, a bank that is considering loaning funds to the company to acquire
additional inventory. A financial forecast presents the entity's expected financial position, results of
operations, and cash flows, and is more appropriate than is a financial projection for inclusion in
an annual report.
20-13 A report on an examination of a financial forecast includes:
20-3
20-15 CPAs may examine Management's Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) when they have (1) audited
the most recent financial statement period to which the MD&A applies, and (2) the other financial
statement periods have also been audited by them or by other auditors.
20-16 The practitioners' objectives in an examination of Managements Discussion and Analysis are to
provide assurance about whether:
(1)
(2)
(3)
The presentation includes, in all material respects, the required elements of the rules and
regulations adopted by the SEC.
The historical financial amounts included in the presentation have been accurately derived,
in all material respects, from the entity's financial statements.
The underlying information, determinations, estimates, and assumptions provide a
reasonable basis for the disclosures contained in the presentation.
20-17 The principles that may be included in a Trust Services engagement are:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
Security. The system (infrastructure, software, people, procedures, and data) is protected
against unauthorized physical and logical access in conformity with the entitys security
processes.
Availability. The system is available for operation and use in conformity with the entitys
availability policies.
Processing Integrity. System processing is complete, accurate, timely, and authorized.
Online Privacy. Private information obtained as a result of electronic commerce is
collected, used, disclosed, and retained in conformity with entitys policies.
Confidentiality. Information designated as confidential is protected in conformity with the
entitys confidentiality policies.
20-18 The purpose of a WebTrust engagement is essentially to provide assurance on electronic commerce
systems. A WebTrust engagement is designed to provide assurance to individuals or organizations
about the practices and controls of an entity that they are contracted with over the Internet.
SysTrust engagements involve providing assurance on system controls. A SysTrust report assures
individuals inside and outside of the company that a system is reliable when evaluated against the
principles.
20-19 Several organizations provide services competing with WebTrust. The Better Business Bureau
provides a BBBOnLine program with two different logos-a privacy seal and a reliability seal.
Another program offered by TRUSTe provides assurance that customer information will be
protected and not used for other purposes. Finally, the International Computer Security
Association offers a program with certification of Websites as using technology that protects
customer data.
20-4
20-20 CPAs may provide examination or agreed-upon procedures engagements for SysTrust or WebTrust.
A review level service is not allowed.
20-21 PrimePlus/ElderCare Services include financial services include goal setting, funding analysis, cost
management and needs assessment and nonfinancial services such as interpersonal and relationship
management, as well as interaction of service providers with the client. Figure 20.1 provides more
detailed examples.
20-22 Assurance services that are currently under development by the AICPA include (only two required):
(a)
Assurance services are independent professional services that improve the quality
of information or its context for decision makers.
(b)
Assurance services are currently developing as a natural extension of the audit function.
Management has recognized that contracting costs may be reduced in many situations by
providing users access to information that is certified as to its reliability. In addition,
developments in information technology have fueled the demand for assurance services as
users can now have instantaneous access to a broad range of "on-line" information that is
customized to their needs.
(c)
20-5
20-24
(a)
Examinations (referred to as audits for historical financial statements), reviews,
and agreed-upon procedures engagements.
(b)
(c)
(d)
20-25
20-6
(b)
20-26
(a)
During a Trust Services Engagement the CPAs report on one or more of the
following principles:
1. Security. The system is protected against unauthorized access (both physical and
logical).
2. Availability. The system is available for operation and use as committed or agreed.
3. Processing integrity. System processing is complete, accurate, timely, and authorized.
4. Confidentiality. Information designated as confidential is protected as committed or
agreed
upon.
5. Privacy. Personal information is collected, used, retained, disclosed and destroyed in
conformity with the commitments in the entitys privacy notice and with criteria set
forth
in generally accepted privacy principles issued by the AICPA and CICA.
(b)
20-27
Several organizations provide services competing with WebTrust. The Better Business
Bureau provides a BBBOnLine program with two different logosa privacy seal and a
reliability seal. Another program offered by TRUSTe provides assurance that customer
information will be protected and not used for other purposes. TRUSTe tests information
confidentiality by seeding phony information into its clients' databases to determine
whether it turns up in another database. Finally, the International Computer Security
Association (ICSA) offers a program with certification of Websites as using technology
that protects customer data. ICSA's process includes a combination of self-reporting, onsite evaluation, remote testing, and spot testing.
(a)
Criteria are needed for an attestation engagement because it is the criteria which
serve as the standards or benchmarks that are used to evaluate the subject matter of the
engagement. The client's information is measured against these standards. Without such
standards there would be no basis for comparison.
(b)
Suitable criteria are objective and permit reasonably consistent measurements. Also,
suitable criteria must be sufficiently complete such that no relevant factors are omitted that
would affect a conclusion about the subject matter. Finally, suitable criteria should
measure some characteristic of the subject matter that is relevant to a user's decision.
(c)
Criteria may be available to users in a variety of manners. If a regulatory agency
or an expert body using due process developed the criteria, they are likely to be publicly
available to users. Alternatively, the criteria may be made available to the users in the
presentation of the subject matter, in the assertion, or in the practitioners' report.
20-7
(a) (2) The second standard of reporting for attestation engagements requires that the
report state the practitioner's conclusion about the subject matter, or an assertion about the
subject matter, based on the criteria against which the subject matter was measured.
(b)
(4) The attestation standards relating to financial forecasts require that when several
significant assumptions are not listed that an adverse opinion be issued.
(c)
(2) While an attestation report on MD&A does state that the presentation includes the
required elements of the rules and regulations adopted by the SEC, it does not include an
opinion that the presentation is in conformity with rules and regulations adopted by the
SEC.
(d)
(2) A SysTrust report includes an opinion on management's assertion that the Website
meets one or more of the SysTrust principles.
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(2) All attest services are also assurance services. Thus answer (2) is impossiblea
service that is not an assurance service, but is an attest service.
(j)
(3) Suitable criteria are the criteria followed in the preparation of the subject matter.
Accordingly, suitable criteria are not the subject matter.
(k)
(l)
(4) Trust services deal with the issues of security, availability, processing integrity,
confidentiality and privacy.
20-8
20-29
Client Need
Type of Service
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
i.
j.
20-30
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
6
2
7
9
8
1
20-31
20-9
Attestation
Service?
Level of Service
Attestation to
prospective
information
Yes
Examination
WebTrust
Yes
Examination
Audit of internal
control
Yes
Audit
(Examination)
SysTrust
Yes
Examination
PrimePlus/Elder
Care Services
Attestation to
MD&A
No
Other
Yes
Examination
Attestation to
prices
Yes
Examination
Agreed-upon
procedures
engagement
Attestation to
distance
Yes
Other (statement of
findings)
Yes
Review
Other assurance
No
Other
20-32
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
10
12
13
11
2
3
(g) 5
(h) 4
Problems
20-33
(a)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(b)
(c)
The criteria are used by the CPAs to evaluate whether the principle is being achieved.
(d)
20-10
20-34
(a)
The Attestation Standards provide guidance for an engagement such as one on
customer satisfaction. They provide two types of general use services--examinations and
reviews.
(b)
Suitable criteria are those that are objective and permit reasonably consistent
measurements. In addition, the criteria must be sufficiently complete such that no relevant
factors are omitted that would affect a conclusion about the subject matter. Finally, the
criteria must measure some characteristic of the subject matter that is relevant to a users
decision.
(c)
We have examined the accompanying Schedule of Customer Satisfaction Measures for the
three years ended December 31, 20X4. This schedule is the responsibility of Grayson,
Inc.'s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this schedule based on
our examination.
Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the schedule and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the Schedule of Customer Satisfaction Measures referred to above presents
fairly, in all material respects, the levels of customer satisfaction for the three years ended
December 31, 20X4, in conformity with the measurement and disclosure criteria set forth
in Note 1.
Webster & Lowe, LLP
March 1, 20X5
NOTE TO INSTRUCTOR: If the CPAs believe that the criteria are not
understandable by users other than management a paragraph must be added to the report
restricting its use.
20-35 (a)
(b)
The subject matter of the engagement is the set of prices of the various items sold by Food
Queen.
In an area in which no suitable criteria have been developed, the management of Food
Queen, with concurrence of the practitioners, will need to attempt to develop them.
Suitable criteria are those that are objective and permit reasonably consistent
measurement. The criteria must be sufficiently complete such that no relevant factors are
omitted that would affect a conclusion about he subject matter. Also, the criteria must
measure some characteristics of the subject matter that is relevant to a user's decision.
20-11
Various approaches are possible--we will describe two. First, one approach would be to
take a random sample of food prices and match that sample against the prices of
competitor stores. Second, an effort could be made to describe a "reasonable customer,"
and to identify the nature of that customer's purchases. Using this second approach, a
sample of prices would be taken of various categories of food (fruits, vegetables, meat,
etc.) and the results would be weighted by that reasonable customer's average purchases of
each type of food.
(c)
(d)
There are at least two issues, including: (1) whether the results of attestation engagements
may be included in advertising claims, and (2) whether the criteria developed in this
question are appropriate for "general use" rather than only for "restricted use."
Concerning the first issue, nothing in the professional standards prohibits using such
information for advertising purposes. Because of difficulties such as those presented in the
problem (e.g., simply not using the report if Food Queen's prices aren't the lowest) some
CPA firms have not accepted attestation engagements that involve advertising claims.
Whether the criteria developed in response to this question would be appropriate for
"general use" is a significant question. Criteria developed by specified parties such as
management often will result in a restricted use attestation report. The text provides the
example of criteria from a contract between two parties as one that might be restricted and
therefore not appropriate for general use. In this case, however, it would seem quite
possible to develop criteria that could be presented with the presentation in an
understandable manner.
(e)
20-12
NOTE 1 TO INSTRUCTOR: If the CPAs believe that the criteria are not understandable
by users other than management a paragraph must be added to the report restricting its
use.
NOTE 2 TO INSTRUCTOR: This case is loosely constructed on the strategy used by
a major grocery chain to move into the Phoenix market. In that case, a general use report
was issued based on suitable criteria developed based on a weighted average of a
reasonable family's purchases.
20-36
The answer to this question will vary depending upon when the website is accessed. As we
go to press the following represent some of the guidance available:
Trust Services Principles and CriteriaThe principles and criteria for trust services.
Getting Started with Trust ServicesDetails on how to begin offering the service.
The Need for Reliable SystemsGeneral guidance on systems.
Also, as we go to press, the only way we are able to access this information at
www.aicpa.org is through use of the search term SysTrust. It turns up a number of
irrelevant documents in addition to the above.
20-13