Scribd
Upload
210 views

Calculating Logarithms by Hand

This document describes a 4 step method for calculating logarithms by hand with minimal effort: 1. Choose a base that matches the powers of the number, such as base 2 for numbers that are powers of 2. 2. Factor the logarithm into a whole number power of the base plus the remaining fraction. 3. Make a table of powers for the remaining fraction to take advantage of logarithmic identities. 4. Add the new fraction to the running total, approximating the logarithm through repeated applications of steps 2-3.

Uploaded by

asda
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
210 views

Calculating Logarithms by Hand

This document describes a 4 step method for calculating logarithms by hand with minimal effort: 1. Choose a base that matches the powers of the number, such as base 2 for numbers that are powers of 2. 2. Factor the logarithm into a whole number power of the base plus the remaining fraction. 3. Make a table of powers for the remaining fraction to take advantage of logarithmic identities. 4. Add the new fraction to the running total, approximating the logarithm through repeated applications of steps 2-3.

Uploaded by

asda
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Calculating logarithms by hand

Introduction:
This paper is my comments on how to calculate logarithms by hand with a minimum
of fuss. I am aware of Eulers method and the Taylor series.

Step one: Choosing a base


The base can make the logarithms easy or hard, depending on what you choose. If
you are working with numbers that are clearly powers of two, a base 2 logarithm is
a good start. For example, the numbers 128 and 1024 are 2^7 and 2^10
respectively. Their base 2 logarithms are rational integers 7 and 10. As another
example, the numbers 25 and 625 are powers of 5 (5^2 and 5^4). Using base 5
would be the best choice.
Once a base is chosen, you may need the answer in another base. Two popular
choices are base e and base 10. There is a change of base formula, but it helps if
you remember that Log A with base B is the inverse of Log B with base A.
Log B base A = 1/(Log A base B)
For example, Log 10 base 2 is 3.32. I can divide any logarithm of base 2 by 3.32 for
conversion to base 10.

Step two: Factoring the logarithm


Suppose that we want the logarithm of 10 base 2. The nearest power of 2 is 2^3, or
8.
Ten divided by 8 is 1.25.
10 = (2^3)(10/2^3) = (8)(10/8) = (8)(1.25)
The motivation for doing this step is this identity:
Log (AB) = Log A + Log B
The logarithm of a neat power like 2^3 base 2 will be an easy integer. By factoring
it out, you are left with that number plus a smaller logarithm. For example, using
the Logarithm of 10 base 2, we are left with 3 + Log (1.25) in base 2. At this point,
we have approximated the first digit of the logarithm with hardly any math at all.
We are left with Log 1.25 base 2.

Step three: Make a table of powers of the remaining logarithms


number.

Take the remainder (1.25 in my example), and make a small table of its powers, like
this:
1.25^2 = 1.5625
1.25^3 = 1.95315
1.25^4 = ~2.44

Stop whenever the result exceeds the base.


The reason that I do this step is to benefit from this Logarithmic identity:
Log A = (1/B) Log A^B
I do this step because it allows me to use this identity from Step 2:
Log (AB) = Log A + Log B
For example, the Log 1.25 base 2 is equal to (1/4)Log 2.44 base 2.
Log 1.25 = (1/4) Log 2.44
I can factor 2.44 into (2) and (2.44/2), or 1.22.
Log 1.25 base 2 = (1/4)(Log 2 base 2 + Log 1.22 base 2)
Log 1.25 base 2 = 1/4 + (1/4)Log 1.22 base 2.

Step four: Add the new fraction to the answer


Remember in step 2 that the answer was 3 + Log (1.25) in base 2?
Now we have 3 + 1/4 + (1/4)Log 1.22 base 2, or ~3.25 (plus Log 1.22).
We still do not know Log 1.22 base 2, but we can repeat step 3 and 4 indefinitely.
This process very quickly arrives at a decent approximation of Log 10 base 2.
Note: If you truncate the power tables for ease of calculation, you give up some
accuracy in the result. However, it can speed up the calculations quite a bit.
From my example, 1.95315 times 1.25 = 2.4414375. It is much faster and easier to
use ~1.95 times 1.25, if also much less accurate.

Background:
This method was my attempt to make use of an abacus easier. In the process, I
learned quite a bit about logarithms. The abacus that I use is called a Soroban.
This document is explicitly public domain.

Saturday, March 7, 2015 / Jim Hall / [email protected]

You might also like