Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs Inspection and Compliance Administration 1100 4" St SW, Washington, DC 20024 DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER & REGULATORY AFFAIRS Inspection Report Property Address & Unit Number _| 1367 Perry Place NW Customer Crampton Site Representative Inspector name Delaine Englebert Badge #2022 Date & Time of inspection 10/29/2014 10:00am. CAP ID #/ Permit # Inspection Type: (Check below or list) —»* [Permit [J Complaint LD tllegal Const. Description Tarrived on site at the request of the homeowner. This case was initiated through the Office of Consumer Protection Investigator T. Lawson. The homeowner, Mr. Stuart Crampton, stated that they had purchased this home in March 2011. He further states that they had experienced several issues with the home. My findings are as follows: 1. 12DCMR105.1 _Failure to apply and obtain proper building permit for interior and exterior structural work and changes to structure. (Front porch, new rear deck and structural beams at roof and ceiling) 2 12DCMR105.1__ Failure to apply and obtain permit for new rear fence installation. 3. 12DCMR105.1__Failure to apply and obtain permit for all new electrical wiring and fixtures. 4, 12DCMR105.1 Failure to apply and obtain permit for all new plumbing fixtures and piping. 5. 12DCMR105.1 _Failure to apply and obtain permit for all new gas fixtures and piping. 6. 12DCMR105.1 _Failure to apply and obtain interior demolition permit for removal of structural ‘components at roof and ceiling. 7. 12DCMR 109.1 Failure to request or obtain required building inspections 8 12DCMR109.1 _Failure to request or obtain required electrical inspections 9, 12 DCMR 109.1 Failure to request or obtain required plumbing inspections 10. 2006 IRC R602.8 Insufficent fire blocking throughout 11. 20061RCR407.3__ Front porch columns not prevented from lateral displacement 12. 20061RC 802.11 Porch columns not attached at beam to prevent uplift 13, 2006 1RCR903.2__ Porch not properly flashed to prevent water intrusion 14. 2006 IRC R312.2(2) Guard rails for open side of stair exceeds allowable limits 15. 2006 IRC R311.5.6.2 Hand rails for interior stairs are not continuous 16. 2006 IRC R305.1(4) Basement bathroom does not meet minimum ceiling height above fixtures 17. 2006 IRC R310.1 Window at basement bedroom does not meet egress requirements 18. 2006 1IRCR502.6 — Newstructural beams are not properly supported 19. 2006 IRC R308.4(6) Tempered glass required adjacent to door at second floor bath 20. 2006IRCR502.2 —_ Deck is not positively attached to primary structure 21. 2006 IRCR502.6 —_Deck joists do not have proper bearing 22, 2006 IRCR311.2.1 Deck stairs are not positively attached 23. 2006 IRC 311.5.6.3 Handrails missing at deck 24. 2006 IRC R311.2.1__Interior stairs do not have proper bearing PAGET.25. 2006 IRC Table R302.1 Failure to maintain minimum fire resistance rating at party walls 26. 2006 IRCRS02.6 LVL beams installed do not have proper bearing 2. 2006 IRC TableN1102.1 Failure to provide adequate insulation 28. 2006 IRCN1102.4.1 Failure to seal building thermal envelope to prevent air leakage and intrusion. 29. 2006 IRC M1601.3.1 Mechanical duct tape not properly marked or labeled 30. 2006 IRC M1601.3.3 Mechanical duct installation are not properly fireblocked 31, 2006 1RCM1602.3 Outdoor air inlets not covered with screen or other material 32, 2006 IRCM1507.2 Exhaust air from basement bathroom does not extend to exterior m3. 2008 NEC Art. 334.30 SE cable is not secured within 12” of cabinet. 34, 2006 IRC P2709.2 Shower liners not installed properly at 3” above finished thresholds 35. 2008 NECArt.314.17 Open junctions at can light fixtures 36. 2006 IRC R319.1(6) Cut ends of LVL must be protected in masonry ‘This inspection is based upon my limited visibility of all construction aspects of the work completed. At the time of my inspection all sheetrock has been placed with limited access holes provided by the homeowner. During my initial visit to the home the homeowner stated that he had had an outside agency provide testing for some of the previous existing flooring found in the basement area. This is a typical adhesively applied tile which appears to be partially removed. | explained to the homeowner that this was not an uncommon practice for this type of flooring to be covered as part of the renovation process. Mr. Crampton stated that the third party testing agency had confirmed asbestos particulates in the flooring materials. Also, Mr. Crampton was able to provide photographs of the previous rear deck area of the home. It is clear thatan old masonry supported structure has been removed and replaced by a larger rear deck. This report has been amended to show a revision of code violations found present during a subsequent site visit on 10/29/2014 after all sheetrock had been removed. A Notice of Infraction will be issued to the previous owmer at this time. Designated this property as Blighted? [] YES [XJ NO. This inspection summary report was prepared in the regular course of business of DCRA and is maintained in the files of the Inspections and Compliance Administration. It accurately reflects the condition of the property on the date written above. The undersigned declares under penalty of perjury that the forgoing information is true to th f my knowledge, information, and belief. Inspector Signature: Badge #: 2022 Date: 10/29/2014 PAGE #__2