The document discusses different types of analog filters - Butterworth, Chebyshev, and Elliptic. It explains that Butterworth filters have a maximally flat frequency response with no ripples but the slowest roll-off, requiring a higher order filter. Chebyshev filters allow ripple to achieve a faster roll-off with a lower order filter, and come in Type 1 and 2 varieties. Elliptic filters have the steepest roll-off but ripple in both passband and stopband, and nonlinear phase response.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
43 views
Report DSP
The document discusses different types of analog filters - Butterworth, Chebyshev, and Elliptic. It explains that Butterworth filters have a maximally flat frequency response with no ripples but the slowest roll-off, requiring a higher order filter. Chebyshev filters allow ripple to achieve a faster roll-off with a lower order filter, and come in Type 1 and 2 varieties. Elliptic filters have the steepest roll-off but ripple in both passband and stopband, and nonlinear phase response.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2
The frequency response of the
Butterworth filter is maximally flat
(which means it has no ripples) in the passband and rolls off towards zero in the stopband. A first-order filter's response rolls off at 6 dB per octave (20 dB per decade) (all first-order lowpass filters have the same normalized frequency response). The roll off of Butterworth is smooth and monotonic compared to other filter types. Compared with a Chebyshev Type I/Type II filter or an elliptic filter, the Butterworth filter has a slower roll-off, and thus will require a higher order to implement a particular stopband specification, but Butterworth filters have a more linear phase response in the pass-band than Chebyshev Type I/Type II and elliptic filters can achieve. The Chebyshev response is a mathematical strategy for achieving a faster roll-off by allowing ripple in the frequency response. As the ripple increases (bad), the roll-off becomes sharper (good). The Chebyshev response is an optimal trade-off between these two parameters. Chebyshev filters where the ripple is only allowed in the passband are called type 1 filters. Chebyshev filters that have ripple only in the stopband are called type 2 filters, but are are seldom used. Chebyshev filters have a poor phase response. It can be shown that for a passband flatness within 0.1dB and a stopband attenuation of 20dB an 8th order Chebyshev filter will be required against a 19th order Butterworth filter. This may be important if you are using a lower specification processor. Compared to a Butterworth filter, a Chebyshev filter can achieve a sharper transition between the passband and the stopband with a lower order filter. The sharp transition between the passband and the stopband of a Chebyshev filter produces smaller absolute errors and faster execution speeds than a Butterworth filter. Chebyshev II filters have the same advantage over Butterworth filters that Chebyshev filters havea sharper transition between the passband and the stopband with a lower order filter, resulting in a smaller absolute error and faster execution speed.
The cut-off slope of an elliptic filter is steeper than that of a Butterworth,
Chebyshev, or Bessel, but the amplitude response has ripple in both the passband and the stopband, and the phase response is very non-linear. However, if the primary concern is to pass frequencies falling within a certain frequency band and reject frequencies outside that band, regardless of phase shifts or ringing, the elliptic response will perform that function with the lowest-order filter. Compared with the same order Butterworth or Chebyshev filters, the elliptic filters provide the sharpest transition between the passband and the stopband, which accounts for their widespread use. I conclude that based on the three analog filters (Butterworth, Chebyshev, and Elliptic), when the roll-off is sharper the ripple increases, but if we want a filter with no ripples the roll-off is less sharp the solution to obtain a sharper roll-off is to use the higher order of a certain filter.