Scribd
Upload
39 views

08 Data Mining-Other Classifications

This document discusses several advanced classification methods including genetic algorithms, rough set approaches, and fuzzy set approaches. Genetic algorithms attempt to mimic natural evolution by generating an initial population of randomly generated rules that are assessed for fitness. New populations are formed from the fittest rules through genetic operators like crossover and mutation. Rough set approaches establish equivalence classes within data to approximate classifications. Fuzzy set approaches allow for fuzzy or gradual thresholds rather than sharp cutoffs, allowing elements to belong to multiple fuzzy sets to varying degrees. This handles imprecise data better than traditional binary logic.

Uploaded by

Raj Endran
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
39 views

08 Data Mining-Other Classifications

This document discusses several advanced classification methods including genetic algorithms, rough set approaches, and fuzzy set approaches. Genetic algorithms attempt to mimic natural evolution by generating an initial population of randomly generated rules that are assessed for fitness. New populations are formed from the fittest rules through genetic operators like crossover and mutation. Rough set approaches establish equivalence classes within data to approximate classifications. Fuzzy set approaches allow for fuzzy or gradual thresholds rather than sharp cutoffs, allowing elements to belong to multiple fuzzy sets to varying degrees. This handles imprecise data better than traditional binary logic.

Uploaded by

Raj Endran
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

426

Chapter 9 Classification: Advanced Methods

Challenges in case-based reasoning include finding a good similarity metric (e.g., for
matching subgraphs) and suitable methods for combining solutions. Other challenges
include the selection of salient features for indexing training cases and the development
of efficient indexing techniques. A trade-off between accuracy and efficiency evolves as
the number of stored cases becomes very large. As this number increases, the case-based
reasoner becomes more intelligent. After a certain point, however, the systems efficiency
will suffer as the time required to search for and process relevant cases increases. As with
nearest-neighbor classifiers, one solution is to edit the training database. Cases that are
redundant or that have not proved useful may be discarded for the sake of improved
performance. These decisions, however, are not clear-cut and their automation remains
an active area of research.

9.6

Other Classification Methods


In this section, we give a brief description of several other classification methods, including genetic algorithms (Section 9.6.1), rough set approach (Section 9.6.2), and fuzzy set
approaches (Section 9.6.3). In general, these methods are less commonly used for classification in commercial data mining systems than the methods described earlier in this
book. However, these methods show their strength in certain applications, and hence it
is worthwhile to include them here.

9.6.1

Genetic Algorithms
Genetic algorithms attempt to incorporate ideas of natural evolution. In general,
genetic learning starts as follows. An initial population is created consisting of randomly
generated rules. Each rule can be represented by a string of bits. As a simple example,
suppose that samples in a given training set are described by two Boolean attributes,
A1 and A2 , and that there are two classes, C1 and C2 . The rule IF A1 AND NOT A2
THEN C2 can be encoded as the bit string 100, where the two leftmost bits represent
attributes A1 and A2 , respectively, and the rightmost bit represents the class. Similarly,
the rule IF NOT A1 AND NOT A2 THEN C1 can be encoded as 001. If an attribute
has k values, where k > 2, then k bits may be used to encode the attributes values.
Classes can be encoded in a similar fashion.
Based on the notion of survival of the fittest, a new population is formed to consist
of the fittest rules in the current population, as well as offspring of these rules. Typically,
the fitness of a rule is assessed by its classification accuracy on a set of training samples.
Offspring are created by applying genetic operators such as crossover and mutation.
In crossover, substrings from pairs of rules are swapped to form new pairs of rules. In
mutation, randomly selected bits in a rules string are inverted.
The process of generating new populations based on prior populations of rules continues until a population, P, evolves where each rule in P satisfies a prespecified fitness
threshold.

9.6 Other Classification Methods

427

Genetic algorithms are easily parallelizable and have been used for classification as
well as other optimization problems. In data mining, they may be used to evaluate the
fitness of other algorithms.

9.6.2

Rough Set Approach


Rough set theory can be used for classification to discover structural relationships within
imprecise or noisy data. It applies to discrete-valued attributes. Continuous-valued
attributes must therefore be discretized before its use.
Rough set theory is based on the establishment of equivalence classes within the
given training data. All the data tuples forming an equivalence class are indiscernible,
that is, the samples are identical with respect to the attributes describing the data. Given
real-world data, it is common that some classes cannot be distinguished in terms of the
available attributes. Rough sets can be used to approximately or roughly define such
classes. A rough set definition for a given class, C, is approximated by two setsa lower
approximation of C and an upper approximation of C. The lower approximation of C
consists of all the data tuples that, based on the knowledge of the attributes, are certain to
belong to C without ambiguity. The upper approximation of C consists of all the tuples
that, based on the knowledge of the attributes, cannot be described as not belonging to
C. The lower and upper approximations for a class C are shown in Figure 9.14, where
each rectangular region represents an equivalence class. Decision rules can be generated
for each class. Typically, a decision table is used to represent the rules.
Rough sets can also be used for attribute subset selection (or feature reduction, where
attributes that do not contribute to the classification of the given training data can be
identified and removed) and relevance analysis (where the contribution or significance
of each attribute is assessed with respect to the classification task). The problem of finding the minimal subsets (reducts) of attributes that can describe all the concepts in
the given data set is NP-hard. However, algorithms to reduce the computation intensity
have been proposed. In one method, for example, a discernibility matrix is used that
stores the differences between attribute values for each pair of data tuples. Rather than
C

Upper approximation of C
Lower approximation of C

Figure 9.14 A rough set approximation of class Cs set of tuples using lower and upper approximation
sets of C. The rectangular regions represent equivalence classes.

Chapter 9 Classification: Advanced Methods

searching on the entire training set, the matrix is instead searched to detect redundant
attributes.

9.6.3

Fuzzy Set Approaches


Rule-based systems for classification have the disadvantage that they involve sharp cutoffs for continuous attributes. For example, consider the following rule for customer
credit application approval. The rule essentially says that applications for customers
who have had a job for two or more years and who have a high income (i.e., of at least
$50,000) are approved:
IF (years employed 2) AND (income 50,000) THEN credit = approved.

(9.24)

By Rule (9.24), a customer who has had a job for at least two years will receive credit
if her income is, say, $50,000, but not if it is $49,000. Such harsh thresholding may seem
unfair.
Instead, we can discretize income into categories (e.g., {low income, medium income,
high income}) and then apply fuzzy logic to allow fuzzy thresholds or boundaries to
be defined for each category (Figure 9.15). Rather than having a precise cutoff between
categories, fuzzy logic uses truth values between 0.0 and 1.0 to represent the degree of
membership that a certain value has in a given category. Each category then represents a
fuzzy set. Hence, with fuzzy logic, we can capture the notion that an income of $49,000
is, more or less, high, although not as high as an income of $50,000. Fuzzy logic systems
typically provide graphical tools to assist users in converting attribute values to fuzzy
truth values.
Fuzzy set theory is also known as possibility theory. It was proposed by Lotfi Zadeh
in 1965 as an alternative to traditional two-value logic and probability theory. It lets
us work at a high abstraction level and offers a means for dealing with imprecise data

Fuzzy membership

428

low

medium

high

1.0
0.5
0
0

10K

20K

30K

40K
50K
income

60K

70K

Figure 9.15 Fuzzy truth values for income, representing the degree of membership of income values with
respect to the categories {low, medium, high}. Each category represents a fuzzy set. Note that
a given income value, x, can have membership in more than one fuzzy set. The membership
values of x in each fuzzy set do not have to total to 1.

9.7 Additional Topics Regarding Classification

429

measurement. Most important, fuzzy set theory allows us to deal with vague or inexact
facts. For example, being a member of a set of high incomes is inexact (e.g., if $50,000
is high, then what about $49,000? or $48,000?) Unlike the notion of traditional crisp
sets where an element belongs to either a set S or its complement, in fuzzy set theory,
elements can belong to more than one fuzzy set. For example, the income value $49,000
belongs to both the medium and high fuzzy sets, but to differing degrees. Using fuzzy set
notation and following Figure 9.15, this can be shown as
mmedium income ($49,000) = 0.15 and mhigh income ($49,000) = 0.96,
where m denotes the membership function, that is operating on the fuzzy sets of
medium income and high income, respectively. In fuzzy set theory, membership values for a given element, x (e.g., for $49,000), do not have to sum to 1. This is unlike
traditional probability theory, which is constrained by a summation axiom.
Fuzzy set theory is useful for data mining systems performing rule-based classification. It provides operations for combining fuzzy measurements. Suppose that in
addition to the fuzzy sets for income, we defined the fuzzy sets junior employee and
senior employee for the attribute years employed. Suppose also that we have a rule that,
say, tests high income and senior employee in the rule antecedent (IF part) for a given
employee, x. If these two fuzzy measures are ANDed together, the minimum of their
measure is taken as the measure of the rule. In other words,
m(high income AND senior

employee) (x) = min(mhigh income (x), msenior employee (x)).

This is akin to saying that a chain is as strong as its weakest link. If the two measures
are ORed, the maximum of their measure is taken as the measure of the rule. In other
words,
m(high income OR senior

employee) (x) = max(mhigh income (x), msenior employee (x)).

Intuitively, this is like saying that a rope is as strong as its strongest strand.
Given a tuple to classify, more than one fuzzy rule may apply. Each applicable rule
contributes a vote for membership in the categories. Typically, the truth values for each
predicted category are summed, and these sums are combined. Several procedures exist
for translating the resulting fuzzy output into a defuzzified or crisp value that is returned
by the system.
Fuzzy logic systems have been used in numerous areas for classification, including
market research, finance, health care, and environmental engineering.

9.7

Additional Topics Regarding Classification


Most of the classification algorithms we have studied handle multiple classes, but some,
such as support vector machines, assume only two classes exist in the data. What adaptations can be made to allow for when there are more than two classes? This question is
addressed in Section 9.7.1 on multiclass classification.

You might also like