Assignment Micro #3
Assignment Micro #3
1406511811
Microeconomics Theory 2
Assignment#3
15.1.Demand curve for monopolist
Q=150P
production.
a. Profit-maximizing
price-quantity
combination
for
monopolist and the profit will be:
From the demand function above, we can conclude that:
Cost,
C ( Q )=0
Demand function,
Revenue,
Q=150P P=150Q
Marginal Revenue,
Profit,
this
MR=
dR(Q)
=1502 Q
dQ
=R ( Q )C (Q )=150 QQ 20=150 QQ 2
d
=0
dQ
and
SOSC,
d2
<0
d Q2
thus,
Q=75
and
P=15075=75
d 2 d (1502 Q)
=
=2
dQ
d Q2
Since SOSC
price,
d2
=2<0
d Q2
(hold)
Q =75
and
2
=R ( Q )C (Q )=150 (75 )75 =5625
b. There are two firms in the market facing the demand and cost
conditions just described for their identical products. Firms
choose quantities simultaneously as in the Cournot model. The
output in the nash equilibrium, market output, price and firm
profits will be:
Cournot Model:
Market output,
Q=q 1 +q2
Market price,
P=150Q=150q1 q2
Firm 1
Profit,
d 1
=1502 q 1q 2=0
d q1
thus,
1
q1 =75 q 2 .... (1)
2
Firm 2
Profit,
d 2
=150q12 q 2=0
d q2
thus,
1
q 2=75 q 1 .... (2)
2
q 2=75
1
1
75 q
75 q 2 =75 + 2
2
2
2 4
3 q 2 150
=
4
4
Then,
thus,
q 2=50
1
q1 =75 ( 50 )=50
2
q1c =50
Output firm 2,
q c2=50
Output market,
Market Price,
Profit firm 1,
Profit firm 2,
Bertrand model:
Assumption of market price,
P=MC=0
P=150Q=0 Q=150
The Nash equilibrium quantities for Bertrand:
Market output,
q1b=q b2=
Firm's Output,
Firm's Profit,
Q =150
Q 150
=
=75
2
2
b
Industry Profit,
= 1 + 2=0
d. Demand curve for parts (a) - (c) where the market pricequantity combination appear as follow:
15.2.
Firm's
and
0
a. Profit-maximizing price-quantity combination for a monopolist
and monopolist's profit will be:
From the demand function above, we can conclude that:
Marginal
Cost,
MC=c ;
Average
C=ACxQ=cQ
Revenue,
Profit,
=R ( Q )C (Q )=aQb Q 2cQ
d
=0
dQ
and
SOSC,
d
<0
d Q2
Cost,
AC=c ;
Cost,
2
d d ( aQ b Q cQ )
=
=a2 bQc=0
dQ
dQ
thus,
Q=
ac
2
and
P=ab
2aa+ c a+ c
=
=
( ac
)
2b
2
2
d 2 d (a2 bQc )
=
=2 b
dQ
d Q2
d2
=2b <0
d Q2
Since SOSC
and price,
(hold)
P=
a+ c
2
Q=
ac
2
=R ( Q )C (Q )=PQcQ=
][ ] [
a+c
ac
a+c2c
c
=
2
2b
2
2
ac ( ac )
=
2b
4b
][ ]
Q=q 1 +q2
Firm 1
Profit,
d 1
=a2b q1b q2c=0
d q1
thus,
2 b q1 +b q 2=ac
q1 =
.... (1)
ac b q2
2b
Firm 2
Profit,
d 2
Maximizing profit, FONC, d q2 =0
d 2
=ab q1 2b q2c=0
d q2
b q 1+2 b q 2=ac
thus,
q 2=
.... (2)
ac b q1
2b
2 b q1 +b q 2=ac
x1
2 b q1 +b q 2=ac
b q 1+2 b q 2=ac
x2
2 b q1 +4 b q2 =2 a2 c
3 b q2=( ac)
q 2=
Then,
ac b
q1 =
(ac)
3b
( (ac)
3 b ) 3 a3 c ac ac
=
=
2b
6b
3b
q1c =
(ac)
3b
Output firm 2,
q c2=
ac
3b
Q=q c1 +q2c =
Output market,
Market Price,
ac ac 2(ac)
+
=
3b
3b
3b
P=abQ =ab
Profit firm 1,
][ ] [
a+2 c
ac
a+2 c3 c
c
=
3
3b
3
2
ac ( ac )
=
3b
9b
][ ]
Profit firm 2,
2
a+2 c
ac
a+2 c3 c ac ( ac )
c
=
=
3
3b
3
3b
9b
][ ] [
][ ]
Industry Profit,
( ac )2 ( ac )2 2 ( ac )2
= 1 + 2=
+
=
9b
9b
9b
c. The Nash equilibrium prices for Bertrand duopolists, firm and
market output, and firm and industry profits will be:
Bertrand
P=MC=0
P=abQ=c
bQ=ac
Q=
thus,
ac
b
Q b=
ca
b
ac
Q
b
ac
q1b=q b2= =
=
2
2
2b
Firm's Output,
Profit firm 1,
ac
c (
=0
( ac
)
2b
2b )
Profit firm 2,
ac
c (
=0
( ac
)
2b
2b )
Industry Profit,
= 1 + 2=0
Q=n q i
Q=Qi +q i
P=abQ =ab Qib q i
Profit,
d 1
=ab Qi2 b qi c=0
d q1
ab(n1)q i2 b q ic=0
2 b qi +b (n1) qi=ac
b q i( 2+ n1)=ac
thus,
q1 =
ac
(n+1)b
qic =
Q =n q i =
Output market,
Market Price,
ac
(n+1)b
n ( ac )
(n+1) b
Pc =ab Qc =ab
Profit firm i,
][
][
][ ]
][
a+nc(n+1)c
a+nc
ac
ac
c
=
( n+ 1)
(n+1) b
(n+1)
(n+1) b
a+nc (n+1)c
( ac )2
ac
ac
ac
=
=
(n+1)
( n+1) b
(n+1) (n+1)b (n+1)2 b
Industry Profit,
][
][
=n i=
n ( ac )2
(n+1)2 b
q m=
Output monopolist,
P m=
Price monopolist,
i=
Profit monopolist,
ac
ac
=
(n+1)b 2b
a+nc a+ c
=
2
( n+1)
( ac )2 ( ac )2
=
4b
(n+1)2 b
Output firm,
q1 =q2 =
Qc =n q ci =
Output market,
c
Market Price,
ac
ac
=
(n+1)b 3 b
P=
2 ( ac )
3b
a+nc a+2 c
=
3
(n+1)
( ac )2 ( ac )2
Profit firm, 1= 2= (n+1)2 b = 9 b
2
Industry Profit,
15.3.
Let
ci
n ( ac ) 2 ( ac )
=
=
9b
( n+1)2 b
P=1Q
Q=q 1 +q2
Market output,
Marginal
Cost,
M C i=c i ;
Average
Cost,
A Ci=c i ;
C=ACqi=c i qi
Market price,
P=1Q=1q1q 2
Firm 1
Profit,
thus,
q1 =
1c 1q 2
2
.... (1)
q1 =
1c 1q 2
2
Firm 2
Profit,
d 2
=1q 12 q2 c 2=0
d q2
thus,
q 2=
1c 2q 1
.... (2)
2
q 2=
1c 2q 1
2
Cost,
q 2=
1c 2
1c 1q 2
22 c 21+c 1 +q 2
2
=
2
4
4 q2=12 c2 +c 1 +q 2
q 2=
12 c2 +c 1
3
and
1c 1
q1 =
12 c 2 +c 1
33 c 21+2 c 1c 1 24 c 2+2 c 1 12 c2 + c1
3
=
=
=
2
6
6
3
q1c =
12 c2 +c 1
3
Output firm 2,
q c2=
12 c2 +c 1
3
Q=q c1 +q2c =
Output market,
Market Price,
12c 2 +c 1 12 c 2 +c 1 2c 1c 2
+
=
3
3
3
P=1Q=1
2c 1c 2 32+c 1 +c 2 1+ c1 +c 2
=
=
3
3
3
Profit firm 1,
][
][
1+ c 1+ c 2
12 c 2 +c 1
c
3
3
][
][
1+ c 1+ c 23 c 1 12 c 2+ c 1
12 c2 +c 1 12 c2 +c 1 ( 12 c 2 +c 1 )
1=
=
=
3
3
3
3
9
Profit firm 2,
][
][
1+ c 1+ c 2
12 c 2 +c 1
c
3
3
][
][
1+ c 1+ c 23 c 1 12 c 2+ c 1
12 c2 +c 1 12 c2 +c 1 ( 12 c 2 +c 1 )
1=
=
=
3
3
3
3
9
Industry Profit,
= 1 + 2=
( 12 c 2+ c 1)
9
( 12 c 2+ c 1 )
9
2
2
( 12 c 2+ c1 ) +( 12 c2 + c1 )
Consumer Surplus, CS
1+ c1 +c 2
1 2c 1c 2
1
2
3
3
(
)(
)
1 2c c 31c c
CS= (
)( 3 )
2
3
1 2c c 2c c
CS= (
)( 3 )
2
3
CS=
CS=
( 2c 1c 2 )
18
Total Welfare, W
W = + CS
W=
12 c2 +c 1 12 c2 +c 1 1 2c 1c 2 2c 1c 2
+
3
3
2
3
3
W=
12 c2 +c 1 1 2c 1c2
+
3
2
3
W=
2+2 c 1 +2 c 2+2c 1c 2
6
W=
][
] (
](
)(
)] ( 2c3c )
1
2c 1c 2
3
( 4+ c1 +c 2 ) ( 2c1 c 2 )
18
b. The reduction in firm 1's marginal cost shifts its best response out and
shifts the equilibrium from E to E'
Extra
Suppose
Question
P=MC=
dC (q i)
=c
d qi
P=aQ
c=aQ
Qb=ac
thus,
Qb=ac
q1b=q b2=
Firm's Output,
Q ac ac
=
=
2
2
2
Profit firm 1,
Profit firm 2,
ac
c (
=0
( ac
)
2
2 )
Industry Profit,
= 1 + 2=0
b. Cournot Model:
Market price,
P=aQ=aq1q2
Firm 1
Profit,
d 1
Maximizing profit, FONC, d q1 =0
d 1
=a2 q1q 2c=0
d q1
thus,
2 q1 +q 2=ac
.... (1)
q1 =
ac b q2
2
Firm 2
Profit,
d 2
Maximizing profit, FONC, d q2 =0
d 2
=aq1 2q 2c =0
d q2
thus,
q1 +2 q 2=ac
.... (2)
q 2=
ac q1
2
2 q1 +q 2=ac
x1
2 q1 +q 2=ac
q1 +2 q 2=ac
x2
2 q1 +4 q2=2a2 c
3 q 2=(ac )
q 2=
Then,
ac b
q1 =
(ac)
3
( (ac)
3 ) 3 a3 c ac ac
=
=
Output firm 1,
q1 =
Output firm 2,
q 2=
ac
3
ac
3
Q=q c1 +q2c =
Output market,
P=aQ=a
Market Price,
ac ac 2(ac)
+
=
3
3
3
2(ac ) 3 a2 a+2 c a+2 c
=
=
3
3
3
Profit firm 1,
][ ] [
a+2 c
ac
a+2 c3 c
c
=
3
3
3
][ ]
ac ( ac )
=
3
9
Profit firm 2,
a+2 c
ac
a+2 c3 c ac ( ac )
2=P q c q =( Pc ) q =
c
=
=
3
3
3
3
9
c
2
c
2
c
2
][ ] [
][ ]
Industry Profit,
( ac )2 ( ac )2 2 ( ac )2
= 1 + 2=
+
=
9
9
9
c. Collusive Model:
Market price,
P=aQ=aq1q2
Max
=a q1q 12 q1 q 2c q1 +a q 2q 2c q2
FONC
d
=a2 q12q 2c=0
d q1
d
=a2 q12q 2c=0
d q2
d d
=
=a2 q 12 q2c=0
d q1 d q2
2 q1 +2 q2=ac
q1 +q 2=
thus,
ac
2
Q=
ac
2
Q=
Output market,
ac
2
ac
Q
2
ac
q1 =q2 = =
=
2
2
4
Output firm ,
P=aQ =a
Market Price,
ac 2 aa+c a+c
=
=
2
2
2
Profit firm 1,
][ ] [
a+c
a+ c
a+c2 c
1=P q c q =(Pc) q =
c
=
2
4
2
][ ]
a+c ( ac )
=
4
8
Profit firm 2,
][ ] [
a+ c
a+ c
a+c2c
2=P q c q =( Pc )q =
c
=
2
4
2
Industry Profit,
= 1 + 2=
( ac )2 ( ac )2 ( ac )2
+
=
8
8
4
a+c ( ac )
=
4
8
][ ]