Yeast Protocol Handbook
Yeast Protocol Handbook
United States/Canada
800.662.2566
Asia Pacific
+1.650.919.7300 PT3024-1 (PR973283)
Europe Published July 2009
+33.(0)1.3904.6880
Japan
+81.(0)77.543.6116
Table of Contents
I. Introduction 4
II. Introduction to Yeast Promoters 5
III. Culturing and Handling Yeast 10
IV. Preparation of Yeast Protein Extracts 12
A. General Information 12
B. Preparation of Yeast Cultures for Protein Extraction 12
C. Preparation of Protein Extracts: Urea/SDS Method 13
D. Preparation of Protein Extracts: TCA Method 15
E. Troubleshooting 17
V. Yeast Transformation Procedures 18
A. General Information 18
B. Reagents and Materials Required 19
C. Tips for a Successful Transformation 20
D. Integrating Plasmids into the Yeast Genome 20
E. Small-scale LiAc Yeast Transformation Procedure 20
F. Troubleshooting Yeast Transformation 22
VI. α- and β-Galactosidase Assays 23
A. General Information 23
B. In vivo Plate Assay Using X-gal in the Medium 26
C. Colony-lift Filter Assay 26
D. Liquid Culture Assay Using ONPG as Substrate 27
E. Liquid Culture Assay Using CPRG as Substrate 28
F. Liquid Culture Assay Using a Chemiluminescent Substrate 29
G. α-Gal Quantitative Assay 32
VII. Working with Yeast Plasmids 34
A. General Information 34
B. Plasmid Isolation From Yeast 34
C. Transforming E. coli with Yeast Plasmids 36
VIII. Analysis of Yeast Plasmid Inserts by PCR 39
A. General Information 39
B. Tips for Successful PCR of Yeast Plasmid Templates 39
IX. Additional Useful Protocols 42
A. Yeast Colony Hybridization 42
B. Generating Yeast Plasmid Segregants 43
C. Yeast Mating 44
X. References 46
PPENDICES
A
A. Glossary of Technical Terms 49
B. Yeast Genetic Markers Used in the Matchmaker Systems 51
C. Media Recipes 52
A. Yeast Media 52
B. E. coli Media 55
D. Solution Formulations 56
E. Plasmid Information 60
F. Yeast Host Strain Information 63
List of Tables
Table I. Yeast Promoter Constructs Used to Regulate Reporter Gene Expression
in Matchmaker Plasmids and Host Strains 6
Table II. Yeast Promoter Constructs in the Matchmaker Cloning Vectors 9
Table III. Comparison of β-galactosidase Assays 25
Table IV. Selected Yeast Genes and Their Associated Phenotypes 51
Table V. Matchmaker Reporter Genes and Their Phenotypes 51
Table VI. Matchmaker Two-Hybrid System Cloning Vectors 60
Table VII. Matchmaker Two-Hybrid System Reporter and Control Plasmids 61
Table VIII. Matchmaker One-Hybrid System Cloning, Reporter & Control Plasmids 62
Table IX. Yeast Reporter Strains in the Matchmaker One- and Two-Hybrid Systems 63
List of Figures
Figure 1. Sequence of GAL4 DNA-BD recognition sites in the GAL1, GAL2, MEL1
UASs and the UASG 17-mer 6
Figure 2. Urea/SDS protein extraction method 14
Figure 3. TCA protein extraction method 16
Notice to Purchaser
Clontech products are to be used for research purposes only. They may not be used for any other purpose, including,
but not limited to, use in drugs, in vitro diagnostic purposes, therapeutics, or in humans. Clontech products may not be
transferred to third parties, resold, modified for resale, or used to manufacture commercial products or to provide a service
to third parties without written approval of Clontech Laboratories, Inc.
Practice of the two-hybrid system is covered by U.S. Patent Nos. 5,283,173, 5,468,614, and 5,667,973 assigned to the Research
Foundation of the State University of New York. Purchase of any Clontech two-hybrid reagent does not imply or convey a
license to practice the two-hybrid system covered by these patents. Commercial entities purchasing these reagents must
obtain a license from the Research Foundation of the State University of NewYork before using them. Clontech is required
by its licensing agreement to submit a report of all purchasers of two-hybrid reagents to SUNY Stony Brook. Please contact
the Office of Technology Licensing & Industry Relations at SUNY Stony Brook for license information (Tel: 631.632.9009;
Fax: 631.632.1505).
NOTICE TO PURCHASER: LIMITED LICENSE
Use of this product is covered by one or more of the following US patents and corresponding patent claims outside the
US: 5,079,352 and 6,127,155. The purchase of this product includes a limited, non-transferable immunity from suit under
the foregoing patent claims for using only this amount of product for the purchaser’s own internal research. No right
under any other patent claim (such as method claims in U.S. Patents Nos. 5,210,015, 5,487,972, 5,994,056 and 6,171,785)
and no right to perform commercial services of any kind, including without limitation reporting the results of purchaser’s
activities for a fee or other commercial consideration, is hereby conveyed by the purchase of this product expressly,
by implication, or by estoppel. This product is for research use only. Diagnostic uses require a separate license from
Roche. Further information on purchasing licenses may be obtained by contacting the Director of Licensing, Applied
Biosystems, 850 Lincoln Centre Drive, Foster City, California 94404, USA.
Clontech, the Clontech logo and all other trademarks are the property of Clontech Laboratories, Inc., unless noted
otherwise. Clontech is a Takara Bio Company. ©2009 Clontech Laboratories, Inc.
I. Introduction
TheYeast Protocols Handbook provides background information and general yeast protocols that
complement our system-specific User Manuals.The protocols in this Handbook have been optimized
with our yeast-based Matchmaker™ Two-Hybrid and One-Hybrid Systems, and Matchmaker
Libraries. The Yeast Protocols Handbook is especially useful for researchers who wish to use
yeast as a vehicle for their molecular biology experiments, but have little or no prior experience
working with yeast. For novice and experienced users alike, the Yeast Protocols Handbook will
help you obtain the best possible results with your Matchmaker and other yeast-related products
from Clontech.
This Handbook includes:
• detailed information on culturing and handling yeast
• information on the yeast promoters used in the Matchmaker Systems
• two protocols for preparing protein extracts from yeast
• quantitative and qualitative β-galactosidase assays (for use with lacZ yeast reporter
strains)
• a simple, optimized protocol for isolating plasmids from yeast
• PCR amplification and yeast colony hybridization protocols for the rapid analysis of positive
clones obtained in a library screening
• a small-scale, lithium acetate yeast transformation protocol
• additional protocols for working with certain yeast plasmids and host strains
The special application of yeast transformation for one- and two-hybrid library screening is covered
in detail in each product-specific User Manual. The special application of yeast mating for library
screening is covered in the Pretransformed Matchmaker Libraries User Manual.
Yeast promoters and other cis-acting regulatory elements play a crucial role in yeast-based
expression systems and transcriptional assays such as the Matchmaker One- and Two-Hybrid
Systems. Differences in the promoter region of reporter gene constructs can significantly affect
their ability to respond to the DNA-binding domain of specific transcriptional activators; promoter
constructs also affect the level of background (or leakiness) of gene expression and the level of
induced expression. Furthermore, differences in cloning vector promoters determine the level of
protein expression and, in some cases, confer the ability to be regulated by a nutrient (such as
galactose in the case of the GAL1 promoter).
This chapter provides a brief introduction to several commonly used yeast promoters and cis-
regulatory elements. For further information on the regulation of gene expression in yeast, we
recommend the Guide to Yeast Genetics and Molecular Biology by Guthrie & Fink (1991; No.
V2010-1); Molecular Biology and Genetic Engineering of Yeasts, edited by Heslot & Gaillardin
(1992); Stargell & Struhl (1996); and Pringle et al. (1997; No. V2365-1).
UAS and TATA regions are basic building blocks of yeast promoters
The initiation of gene transcription in yeast, as in other organisms, is achieved by several
molecular mechanisms working in concert. All yeast structural genes (i.e., those transcribed by
RNA polymerase II) are preceded by a region containing a loosely conserved sequence (TATA
box) that determines the transcription start site and is also a primary determinant of the basal
transcription level. Many genes are also associated with cis-acting elements—DNA sequences
to which transcription factors and other trans-acting regulatory proteins bind and affect
transcription levels. The term “promoter” usually refers to both the TATA box and the associated
cis-regulatory elements.This usage is especially common when speaking of yeast gene regulation
because the cis regulatory elements are relatively closely associated with the TATA box (Yoccum,
1987). This is in contrast to multicellular eukaryotes, where cis-regulatory elements (such as
enhancers) can be found very far upstream or downstream from the promoters they regulate.
In this text, “minimal promoter” will refer specifically to the TATA region, exclusive of other
cis-acting elements.
The minimal promoter (or TATA box) in yeast is typically approximately 25 bp upstream of the
transcription start site. Yeast TATA boxes are functionally similar to prokaryotic Pribnow boxes,
but are not as tightly conserved. Furthermore, some yeast transcription units are preceded by
more than one TATA box. The yeast HIS3 gene, for example, is preceded by two different TATA
boxes: TR, which is regulated, and TC, which is constitutive (Mahadevan & Struhl, 1990). Yeast
TATA boxes can be moved to a new location, adjacent to other cis-regulatory elements, and still
retain their transcriptional function.
One type of cis-acting transcription element in yeast is upstream activating sequences (UAS),
which are recognized by specific transcriptional activators and enhance transcription from adjacent
downstream TATA regions. The enhancing function of yeast UASs is generally independent of
orientation; however, it is sensitive to distance effects if moved more than a few hundred base pairs
from the TATA region. There may be multiple copies of a UAS upstream of a yeast coding region.
In addition, UASs can be eliminated or switched to change the regulation of target genes.
GAL1-bs1 TAGAAGCCGCCGAGCGG
GAL1 UAS GAL1-bs2 GACAGCCCTCCGAAGGA
GAL1-bs3 GACTCTCCTCCGTGCGT MEL1 UAS CGGCCATATGTCTTCCG
GAL1-bs4 CGCACTGCTCCGAACAA
GAL2-bs1 CGGAAAGCTTCCTTCCG
GAL2-bs2 CGGCGGTCTTTCGTCCG
GAL2 UAS GAL2-bs3 CGGAGATATCTGCGCCG UAS G17-mer CGGAAGACTCTCCTCCG
GAL2-bs4 CGGGGCGGATCACTCCG
GAL2-bs5 CGGATCACTCCGAACCG
Figure 1. Sequence of the GAL4 DNA-BD recognition sites in the GAL1, GAL2, and MEL1 UASs and the UASG 17-mer
consensus sequence (Giniger & Ptashne, 1988).
(Heslot & Gaillardin, 1992) provides the binding site for the GAL4 DNA-BD. For LexA-based systems,
multiple copies of the LexA operator provide the binding site for the LexA protein. If you are
putting together your own one- or two-hybrid system, you must make sure that the reporter gene’s
promoter will be recognized by the DNA-BD moiety encoded in your DNA-BD fusion vector.
constructs in that it is under the control of the GAL1 UAS and a minimal promoter containing both
HIS3 TATA boxes (Flick & Johnston, 1990). The result is high-level expression (due to the GAL1
UAS) when induced by a positive two-hybrid interaction; this construct also exhibits a significant
level of constitutive leaky expression (due to the HIS3 TC). In contrast, in HF7c, CG-1945, PJ69-2A,
and AH109 the entire HIS3 promoter (including bothTATA boxes) was replaced by the entire GAL1
promoter, leading to tight regulation of the HIS3 reporter in those strains (Feilotter et al., 1994).
The HIS3 reporter plasmids pHISi and pHISi-1 used in the Matchmaker One Hybrid System also
have both of the HIS3 TATA boxes present in the minimal promoter. By inserting a cis-acting
element in the MCS, the regulated TATA box (TR) can be affected, but there is still a significant
amount of constitutive, leaky expression due to the HIS3 TC. The leaky HIS3 expression of these
one-hybrid plasmids is first used to help construct HIS3 reporter strains, and later is controlled
by including 3-aminotriazole in the medium to suppress background growth.
Reporter genes under the control of LexA operators
In LexA-based two-hybrid systems, the DNA-BD is provided by the entire prokaryotic LexA
protein, which normally functions as a repressor of SOS genes in E. coli when it binds to LexA
operators, which are an integral part of the promoter (Ebina et al., 1983). When used in the yeast
two-hybrid system, the LexA protein does not act as a repressor because the LexA operators are
integrated upstream of the minimal promoter and coding region of the reporter genes. LEU2
reporter expression in yeast strain EGY48 is under the control of six copies of the LexA operator
(op) sequence and the minimal LEU2 promoter. In the lacZ reporter plasmids, lacZ expression is
under control of 1–8 copies of the LexA op (Estojak et al., 1995) and the minimal GAL1 promoter.
Because all of the GAL1 UAS sequences have been removed from the lacZ reporter plasmids
(West et al., 1984), this promoter is not regulated by glucose or galactose.
Promoters used to drive fusion protein expression in two-hybrid cloning vectors
The ADH1 promoter (or a truncated version of it) is the promoter used to drive expression of the
fusion proteins in most of the Matchmaker cloning vectors.The 1500-bp full-length ADH1 promoter
(Ammerer, 1983; Vainio, GenBank accession number: Z25479) leads to high-level expression of
sequences under its control in pGADT7, pGAD GH, pLexA, and pAS2-1 during logarithmic growth
of the yeast host cells.Transcription is repressed in late log phase by the ethanol that accumulates
in the medium as a by-product of yeast metabolism.
Several Matchmaker cloning vectors contain a truncated 410-bp ADH1 promoter (Table II). At one
point, it was believed that only this portion was necessary for high-level expression (Beier &Young,
1982). In most vector constructs, however, this truncated promoter leads to low or very low levels of
fusion protein expression (Ruohonen et al., 1991; Ruohonen et al., 1995;Tornow & Santangelo, 1990).
This observation has been confirmed at Clontech by quantitative Western blots (unpublished data).
The high-level expression reported by Beier &Young (1982) was apparently due to a segment of DNA
derived from pBR322, which was later found to coincidentally enhance transcriptional activity in yeast
(Tornow & Santangelo, 1990). In the Matchmaker vector pACT2, strong constitutive fusion protein
expression is driven by the 410-bp truncated ADH1 promoter adjacent to this enhancing pBR322
segment.
The DNA-BD cloning vector pGBKT7 used in MatchmakerTwo-Hybrid System 3 contains a 700-bp
fragment of the ADH1 promoter. This trucated promoter leads to high-level expression, but no
ethanol repression (Ruohonen et al., 1991; Ruohonen et al., 1995).
The AD cloning vector pB42AD and the alternative DNA-BD vector pGilda used in the Matchmaker
LexATwo-Hybrid System utilize the full-length GAL1 promoter to drive fusion protein expression.
Because the LexA system host strain is wild-type for GAL4 and GAL80, fusion protein expression
is regulated by glucose and galactose.
For additional information on yeast, we recommend Guthrie and Fink (1991) Guide toYeast Genetics
and Molecular Biology (Cat No. V2010-1).
A. Yeast Strain Maintenance, Recovery from Frozen Stocks, and Routine Culturing
1. Long-term storage
• Yeast strains can be stored indefinitely in YPD medium with 25% glycerol at –70°C. For
storage >1 year, the temperature must be maintained below –55°C.
• Transformed yeast strains are best stored in the appropriate SD dropout medium to
keep selective pressure on the plasmid. (See Appendix C.A for recipes and Appendix
E for plasmid information.)
To prepare new glycerol stock cultures of yeast:
a. Use a sterile inoculation loop to scrape an isolated colony from the agar plate.
b. Resuspend the cells in 200–500 µl of YPD medium (or the appropriate SD medium)
in a 1.5-ml microcentrifuge tube. Vortex tube vigorously to thoroughly disperse the
cells. Add sterile 50% glycerol to a final concentration of 25%.
c. Tightly close the cap. Shake the vial before freezing at –70°C.
2. To recover frozen strains and prepare working stock plates:
a. Streak a small portion of the frozen glycerol stock onto a YPD (or appropriate SD)
agar plate.
b. Incubate the plate at 30°C until yeast colonies reach ~2 mm in diameter (this takes
3–5 days). Use these colonies as your working stock.
c. Seal plates with Parafilm and store at 4°C for up to two months. Streak a fresh working
stock plate from the frozen stock at 1–2-month intervals.
d. If you cannot recover the strain, the cells may have settled ; in this case, thaw the
culture on ice, vortex vigorously, and restreak.The glycerol stock tube may be refrozen
a few times without damaging the cells.
3. To prepare liquid overnight cultures:
a. Use only fresh (<2-months old) colonies from the working stock plate. Use one large
(2–3-mm diameter) colony per 5 ml of medium. If colonies are small, or if you are
inoculating a larger volume, use several colonies. Important: Vigorously vortex the
medium for ~1 min to thoroughly disperse the cells.
Notes:
• Liquid cultures will grow slower than expected if clumps are present in the inoculum; cells in the
interior of the clumps do not have access to the nutrients in the medium.
• If you are inoculating a volume greater than 1 ml, it is easier to disperse the clumps if the colonies are
first placed in 1 ml of medium in a microcentrifuge tube, vortexed, and then transferred to the desired
volume.
• When growing overnight cultures of yeast transformants, use the appropriate SD minimal medium
to keep selective pressure on extrachromosomal plasmid(s).
• The growth inYPD of yeast strains carrying the ade2-101 mutation will be enhanced by adding adenine
hemisulfate (0.003% final concentration) to the medium (Appendix C.A). All of the host strains (except
EGY48) used in the Matchmaker Systems carry this auxotrophic mutation.
• The growth of transformed PJ69-2A cells in SD/–Trp may also be enhanced by adding excess adenine
to the medium (Appendix C.A).
b. Incubate at 30°C for 16–18 hr with shaking at 230–270 rpm. With most strains, this
will yield a stationary phase culture (OD600 > 1.5).
Note: Different yeast strains grow at different rates. Growth rates may also be affected by the presence
of fusion proteins in certain transformants. In addition, the doubling time of most strains growing in SD
minimal medium is twice as long as in YPD.
c. If you need a mid-log phase culture, transfer enough of the overnight culture into
fresh medium to produce an OD600 = 0.2–0.3. Incubate at 30°C for 3–5 hr with shaking
(230–250 rpm). This will, with most strains, produce a culture with an OD 600
~0.4–0.6.
Note: Generally, YPD or YPDA may be used in this incubation. Because of the shorter incubation time,
plasmid loss will not be significant. However, do not use YPD if you want to induce protein expression
from the yeast GAL1 promoter of a LexA system plasmid, e.g., pB42AD or pGilda; YPD contains glucose,
which represses transcription from the GAL1 promoter.
A. General Information
We provide two alternative protocols for the preparation of protein extracts from yeast. The
results (i.e., protein yield and quality) will vary depending on the protein and may be more
successful with one protocol than with the other. Because it is difficult to predict which
procedure will give better results, we provide two protocols for comparison. The cell culture
preparation method (Section B) is the same for both protein extraction procedures.
Both extraction procedures address the two most challenging aspects of isolating proteins
from yeast: 1) disrupting yeast cell walls; and 2) inhibiting the many endogenous yeast
proteases. Yeast cell walls are tough and must be disrupted by a combination of physical
and chemical means; methods that utilize glycolytic enzymes are not recommended for this
application because they are often contaminated with proteases. Endogenous proteases
must be counteracted with a cocktail of strong protease inhibitors (recipe in Appendix
D.A). If you know your protein of interest is susceptible to a protease not inhibited by the
recommended cocktail, add the appropriate inhibitor before using the mixture.You may also
wish to add other inhibitors such as sodium fluoride to prevent dephosphorylation, if that
is appropriate for your protein.
1. For each transformed yeast strain you wish to assay in a Western blot, prepare a 5-ml
overnight culture in SD selection medium as described in Section III.A, except use a
single isolated colony (1–2 mm in diameter, no older than 4 days). Use the SD medium
appropriate for your system and plasmids (Appendix E). Also prepare a 10-ml culture
of an untransformed yeast colony in YPD or (if possible) appropriate SD medium as a
negative control.
2. Vortex the overnight cultures for 0.5–1 min to disperse cell clumps. For each clone to be
assayed (and the negative control), separately inoculate 50-ml aliquots of YPD medium
with the entire overnight culture.
3. Incubate at 30°C with shaking (220–250 rpm) until the OD600 reaches 0.4–0.6. (Depending
on the fusion protein, this will take 4–8 hr.) Multiply the OD600 (of a 1-ml sample) by the
culture volume (i.e., 55 ml) to obtain the total number of OD600 units; this number will
be used in Sections C & D. (For example, 0.6 x 55 ml = 33 total OD600 units.)
Note: During late log phase the ADH1 promoter shuts down and the level of endogenous yeast proteases
increases.
4. Quickly chill the culture by pouring it into a prechilled 100-ml centrifuge tube halfway
filled with ice.
5. Immediately place tube in a prechilled rotor and centrifuge at 1000 x g for 5 min at
4°C.
6. Pour off supernatant and resuspend the cell pellet in 50 ml of ice-cold H2O. (Any unmelted
ice pours off with the supernatant.)
7. Recover the pellet by centrifugation at 1,000 x g for 5 min at 4°C.
8. Immediately freeze the cell pellet by placing the tube on dry ice or in liquid nitrogen.
Store cells at –70°C until you are ready to proceed with the experiment.
Cell pellets
Combined supernatants
Cell pellets
Pellet
(Protein and contaminants)
Supernatant (Discard)
E. Troubleshooting
Optimal electrophoretic separation of proteins depends largely on the quality of the equipment
and reagents used in the gel system, the manner in which the protein samples are prepared
prior to electrophoresis, the amount of protein loaded on the gel, and the voltage conditions
used during electrophoresis. These same considerations are important for the subsequent
transfer of proteins to the nitrocellulose membrane where transfer buffer composition,
temperature, duration of transfer, and the assembly of the blotting apparatus can all have
profound effects on the quality of the resultant protein blot. The following troubleshooting
tips pertain to the isolation of protein from yeast. Information on running polyacrylamide
protein gels and performing Western blots is available in published laboratory manuals (e.g.,
Sambrook et al., 1989, or Ausubel et al., 1987–96).
1. Few or no immunostained protein bands on the blot
• The transfer of protein bands to the blot may be confirmed by staining the blot with
Ponceau S.
• The presence of protein bands in the gel (before transfer) may be confirmed by
staining a parallel lane of the gel with Coomassie blue. (Note that once a gel has
been stained with Coomassie blue, the protein bands will not transfer to a blot.)
• The extent of cell wall disruption can be determined by examining a sample of treated
cells under the microscope. Incomplete cell lysis will lower the protein yield.
2. Several bands appear on the blot where a single protein species is expected
• Protein degradation and/or proteolysis may have occurred during sample preparation.
Additional protease inhibitors may be used as desired. Also, make sure that in Steps
C.8.a and D.12 (boiling the protein extracts), the samples are placed into a water bath
that is already boiling. If samples are placed in the water before it has reached boiling
temperature, a major yeast protease (Proteinase B) will be activated. (Proteinase B
is a serine protease of the subtilisin family.)
• Dephosphorylation of a normally phosphoryated fusion protein may have occurred
during sample preparation. Sodium fluoride (NaF) may be added to the protease
inhibitor stock solution to help prevent dephosphorylation (Sadowski et al., 1991).
3. If you are running a reducing gel, make sure that the protein sample has been completely
reduced with either dithiothreitol or 2-mercaptoethanol prior to loading the gel.
A. General Information
LiAc-mediated yeast transformation
There are several methods commonly used to introduce DNA into yeast, including the
spheroplast method, electroporation, and the lithium acetate (LiAc)-mediated method
(reviewed in Guthrie & Fink, 1991). At Clontech, we have found the LiAc method (Ito et al.,
1983), as modified by Schiestl & Gietz (1989), Hill et al. (1991), and Gietz et al. (1992), to be
simple and highly reproducible. This chapter provides detailed protocols for using the LiAc
procedure in a standard plasmid transformation and in a modified transformation to integrate
linear DNA into the yeast genome.
In the LiAc transformation method, yeast competent cells are prepared and suspended in
a LiAc solution with the plasmid DNA to be transformed, along with excess carrier DNA.
Polyethylene glycol (PEG) with the appropriate amount of LiAc is then added and the mixture
of DNA and yeast is incubated at 30°C. After the incubations, DMSO is added and the cells
are heat shocked, which allows the DNA to enter the cells. The cells are then plated on the
appropriate medium to select for transformants containing the introduced plasmid(s).
Because, in yeast, this selection is usually nutritional, an appropriate synthetic dropout (SD)
medium is used.
Simultaneous vs. sequential transformations
The LiAc method for preparing yeast competent cells typically results in transformation
efficiencies of 105 per µg of DNA when using a single type of plasmid. When the yeast is
simultaneously cotransformed with two plasmids having different selection markers, the
efficiency is usually an order of magnitude lower due to the lower probability that a particular
yeast cell will take up both plasmids. (Yeast, unlike bacteria, can support the propagation
of more than one plasmid having the same replication origin, i.e., there is no plasmid
incompatibility issue in yeast.) Thus, in a cotransformation experiment, the efficiency of
transforming each type of plasmid should remain at ~105 per µg of DNA, as determined by
the number of colonies growing on SD medium that selects for only one of the plasmids.
The cotransformation efficiency is determined by the number of colonies growing on SD
medium that selects for both plasmids and should be ~104 cfu/µg DNA.
Simultaneous cotransformation is generally preferred because it is simpler than sequential
transformation—and because of the risk that expression of proteins encoded by the first plasmid
may be toxic to the cells. If the expressed protein is toxic, clones arising from spontaneous
deletions in the first plasmid will have a growth advantage and will accumulate at the expense
of clones containing intact plasmids. However, if there is no selective disadvantage to cells
expressing the first cloned protein, sequential transformation may be preferred because it
uses significantly less plasmid DNA than simultaneous cotransformation. In some cases,
such as when one of the two plasmids is the same for several different cotransformations,
sequential transformations may be more convenient.
Scaling up or down
The small-scale yeast transformation procedure described here can be used for up to 15 parallel
transformations, and uses 0.1 µg of each type of plasmid. Depending on the application, the
basic yeast transformation method can be scaled up without a decrease in transformation
efficiency. If you plan to perform a two-hybrid library screening, you will need a large or
library-scale transformation procedure, which will require significantly more plasmid DNA.
Please refer to your Matchmaker system-specific User Manual for further information on
library screening strategies and specific protocols.
Integration vs. nonintegration of yeast plasmids
For most yeast transformations performed while using the Matchmaker Systems, it is not
necessary or desirable to have the plasmid integrate into the yeast genome. (In fact, yeast
plasmids do not efficiently integrate if they carry a yeast origin of replication and are used
uncut.) However, there are two exceptions to this general rule, as explained in the respective
system-specific User Manuals: (a) In the Matchmaker One-Hybrid System, the researcher must
construct their own custom reporter plasmid and then integrate it into the yeast host strain
before performing the one-hybrid assay. (b) In the Matchmaker LexA Two-Hybrid System,
the p8op-lacZ reporter plasmid can be used either as an autonomously replicating plasmid
or as an integrated plasmid, depending on the desired level of reporter gene expression.The
primary reason for integrating a plasmid in some Matchmaker applications is to generate a
stable yeast reporter strain in which only one copy of the reporter gene is present per cell,
and thereby control the level of background expression. If you have an application that
requires integration of a plasmid into the yeast genome, please see Section V.D.
Transformation controls
When setting up any type of transformation experiment, be sure to include proper controls
for transformation efficiencies. In the case of simultaneous cotransformation, it is important
to determine the transformation efficiencies of both plasmids together, as well as of each
type of plasmid independently. That way, if the cotransformation efficiency is low, you may
be able to determine whether one of the plasmid types was responsible (seeTroubleshooting
Guide, Section F). Therefore, be sure to plate an aliquot of the transformation mixture on the
appropriate SD media that will select for only one type of plasmid. Example calculations are
shown in Section V.E. When screening a library or performing a one- or two-hybrid assay,
you will n
eed additional controls, as explained your system-specific User Manual.
6. Incubate at 30°C for 3 hr with shaking (230 rpm). At this point, the OD600 should be
0.4–0.6.
Note: If the OD600 is <0.4, something is wrong with the culture (see Troubleshooting Section F.6).
7. Place cells in 50-ml tubes and centrifuge at 1,000 x g for 5 min at room temperature
(20–21°C).
8. Discard the supernatants and thoroughly resuspend the cell pellets in sterileTE or distilled
H2O. Pool the cells into one tube (final volume 25–50 ml).
9. Centrifuge at 1,000 x g for 5 min at room temperature.
10. Decant the supernatant.
11. Resuspend the cell pellet in 1.5 ml of freshly prepared, sterile 1X TE/1X LiAc.
12. Add 0.1 µg of plasmid DNA and 0.1 mg of carrier DNA to a fresh 1.5-ml tube and mix.
Notes:
• For simultaneous cotransformation (using two different plasmids), use 0.1 µg of each plasmid (an
approximately equal molar ratio), in addition to the 0.1 mg of carrier DNA.
• For transformations to integrate a reporter vector, use at least 1 µg of linearized plasmid DNA in addition
to the carrier DNA.
13. Add 0.1 ml of yeast competent cells to each tube and mix well by vortexing.
14. Add 0.6 ml of sterile PEG/LiAc solution to each tube and vortex at high speed for 10 sec to
mix.
15. Incubate at 30°C for 30 min with shaking at 200 rpm.
16. Add 70 µl of DMSO. Mix well by gentle inversion. Do not vortex.
17. Heat shock for 15 min in a 42°C water bath.
18. Chill cells on ice for 1–2 min.
19. Centrifuge cells for 5 sec at 14,000 rpm at room temperature. Remove the
supernatant.
20. Resuspend cells in 0.5 ml of sterile 1X TE buffer.
21. Plate 100 µl on each SD agar plate that will select for the desired transformants.To ensure that
you will obtain a plate with well-separated colonies, also spread 100 µl of a 1:1000, 1:100, and
1:10 dilution on 100-mm SD agar plates.These will also provide controls for (co)transformation
efficiency.
Note: If you are performing a cotransformation, plate controls to check transformation efficiency and markers
of each plasmid. On separate 100-mm plates, spread 1 µl (diluted in 100 µl H2O) on medium that will select for
a single type of plasmid.
22. Incubate plates, up-side-down, at 30°C until colonies appear (generally, 2–4 days).
23. To calculate the cotransformation efficiency, count the colonies (cfu) growing on the
dilution plate from Step 22 above that has 30–300 cfu.
cfu x total suspension vol. (µl) = cfu/µg DNA
Vol. plated (µl) x dilution factor x amt. DNA used (µg)*
* In a cotransformation, this is the amount of one of the plasmid types, not the sum of them. If you have used
unequal amounts of two plasmids, use the amount of the lesser of the two.
Sample calculation:
• 100 colonies grew on the 1:100 dilution plate (dilution factor = 0.01)
• plating volume: 100 µl
• resuspension volume = 0.5 ml
• amount of limiting plasmid = 0.1 µg
100 cfu x 0.5 ml x 103 µl/ml = 5 x 105 cfu/µg DNA
100 µl x 0.01 x 0.1 µg
24. Pick the largest colonies and restreak them on the same selection medium for master
plates. Seal plates with Parafilm and store at 4°C for 3–4 weeks.
A. General Information
Considerations
• To reduce variability in liquid assays, assay five separate transformant colonies, and
perform each assay in triplicate.
• It is important that the colonies to be assayed for α- and β-galactosidase activity
are growing on the appropriate SD minimal medium. SD (dropout) medium is
used to keep selective pressure on the hybrid plasmids and, in the case of the
Matchmaker LexA Two-Hybrid System, the lacZ reporter plasmid up to the time
the cells are lysed for the assay. The type of SD medium needed depends on the
plasmids and host strains used. Furthermore, when working with a lacZ reporter
under the control of the inducible GAL1 promoter (such as in the LexA System),
the SD medium must contain galactose (not glucose) as the carbon source. See the
system-specific User Manual for media recommendations.
β-Galactosidase Assays
• X-gal must be used as the β-galactosidase substrate for solid-support assays because
of its high degree of sensitivity. (X-gal is ~106-fold more sensitive than ONPG.) Although
more sensitive than X-gal, Galacton-StarTM is not recommended for agar plate and filter
assays because it gives troublesome background.
• The filter and liquid β-galactosidase assays described here use at least one freeze/thaw cycle
in liquid nitrogen to lyse the yeast cell walls. Freeze-thaw cycles are a rapid and effective cell
lysis method which permits accurate quantification of β-galactosidase activity (Schneider et
al., 1996).
• The colony-lift filter assay (Breeden & Nasmyth, 1985) used to measure β-galactosidase
activity is primarily used to screen large numbers of cotransformants that survive the
HIS3 growth selection in a GAL4 two-hybrid or one-hybrid library screeening. It can also
be used to assay for an interaction between two known proteins in a GAL4 two-hybrid
system.
• The in vivo, agar plate assay is primarily used to screen large numbers of cotransformants
for the expression of the lacZ reporter gene in a LexA two-hybrid library screening when
the reporter gene is maintained on an autonomously replicating plasmid.The in vivo assay
works for LexA transformants because of the lacZ reporter plasmid’s high copy number
and because of the preamplification step that normally precedes the β-galactosidase
assay in this system. (Please refer to the Matchmaker LexA Two-Hybrid User Manual
for more information on library screening.) Because of its relatively low sensitivity, the
in vivo, agar plate assay is not suitable for screening transformants in a GAL4-based
two-hybrid assay, or in a LexA-based two-hybrid assay when the reporter gene has been
integrated into the host genome.
• Liquid cultures are assayed for β-galactosidase to verify and quantify two-hybrid interactions.
Because of their quantitative nature, liquid assays can be used to compare the relative
strength of the protein-protein interactions observed in selected transformants. However,
there is no direct correlation between β-galactosidase activity and the Kd of an interaction
(Estojak et al., 1995). Furthermore, quantitative data cannot be compared between different
host strains having different lacZ reporter constructs. In fact, due to promoter strength
differences, it may be possible to quantitate the relative strength of interactions in some
yeast strains (e.g., Y190, Y187), but not in others (e.g., CG-1945 or HF7c). (See Chapter II
for a discussion of the promoters.)
• The liquid assays described here use one of three substrates: ONPG, CPRG, or a
chemiluminescent substrate (Galacton-Star). The three substrates differ in their relative
cost, sensitivity, and reproducibility. See Table III.
α-Galactosidase Assays
• The α-Gal Quantitative Assay is a sensitive colorimetric method for the detection and
quantitation of yeast α-galactosidase activity resulting from expression of the MEL1
reporter gene in our GAL4-based Matchmaker two-hybrid systems.
MEL1 is a member of the GAL gene family, which, as a group, facilitates the uptake
and utilization of galactose by the cell. Upon binding of GAL4 to the MEL1 upstream
activating sequence (MEL1 UAS), the MEL1 gene product, α-galactosidase, is actively
expressed and secreted to the periplasmic space and culture medium where it catalyzes
the hydrolysis of melibiose to galactose and glucose.The α-Gal Quantitative Assay allows
you to specifically identify and measure this catalytic activity using p-nitrophenyl-α-d-
galactoside (PNP-α-Gal), a colorless compound that yields a yellow product (p-nitrophenol)
upon hydrolysis.
The α-Gal Quantitative Assay can be used to measure the extracellular α-galactosidase
activity produced during the culture of any yeast strain that carries the MEL1 gene. MEL1 is
endogenous to many but not all yeast strains. (Liljeström, 1985; Post-Beittenmiller et al., 1984).
Table IX provides a list of the GAL4-based Matchmaker yeast strains known to carry the MEL1
gene.This list includes strain AH109 used in Clontech’s MatchmakerTwo-Hybrid System 3
(Cat No. 630303) and included with Clontech’s GAL4-based cDNA libraries.
MEL1 has been shown to be a sensitive in vivo reporter for GAL4-based two-hybrid
assays (Aho et al., 1997). The quantitative nature of the α-Gal Assay makes it possible to
compare the degree of MEL1 expression in different Matchmaker two-hybrid host cell
populations containing different pairs of interacting proteins, or to measure differences
in the relative strength of binding between mutant forms of interacting proteins.
Principle of the α-Gal Quantitative Assay
In the α-Gal Quantitative Assay, the catalytic activity of α-galactosidase is monitored
colorimetrically by measuring the rate of hydrolysis of the chromogenic substrate,
p-nitrophenyl-α-d-galactoside (PNP-α-Gal). One of the products of this reaction,
p-nitrophenol, displays a strong absorption band at 410 nm.
α-galactosidase
PNP-α-Gal + H2O p-nitrophenol + D-galactose
(λmax = 410 nm)
Because yeast naturally secrete α-galactosidase into the surrounding medium, it is more
convenient to assay than β-galactosidase, an intracellular enzyme encoded by the lacZ
reporter gene. The α-galactosidase assay is carried out by simply combining a small
aliquot of cell-free culture media with a fixed volume of Assay Buffer; cell lysis is not
necessary. After a prescribed incubation time (usually 60 min), the absorbance at 410
nm (OD410), which is proportional to moles p-nitrophenol liberated, is recorded and used
to calculate the concentration of α-galactosidase in milliunits/(ml x cell).
• To monitor MEL1 expression directly on nutritional selection plates, use X-α-Gal (Cat
No. 630407).
X-α-Gal can be included in the medium before pouring plates or spread on top of
the medium before plating liquid cultures. As α-galactosidase accumulates in the
medium, it hydrolyzes
X-α-Gal causing yeast colonies to turn blue. Instructions for preparing X-α-Gal
indicator plates are given in the X-α-Gal Protocol-at-a-Glance (PT3353-2) supplied with
each purchase of the substrate. Directions for use can also be downloaded from our
website at www.clontech.com.
Protocol
Type of assay Substrate Section Applications/Comments
In vivo, X-gal in medium VI.B • Less sensitive than colony-lift assays;
agar plate recommended only when the cells to be assayed
contain many copies of the lacZ reporter gene
(such as on a high-copy-number plasmid)
• Convenient for large-scale experiments; screen
many plates and colonies at the same time
• Potential drawbacks:
– Qualitative results only
– Expensive if assaying many plates
– Need to check for blue color development at
several time intervals between 24 and 96 hr.
– Background can be troublesome
Colony-lift, X-gal on filter VI.C • Relatively sensitive; recommended when the cells
filter to be assayed contain one or only a few copies
of the lacZ reporter gene
• Convenient for large-scale experiments; screen
many plates and colonies at the same time
• Relatively inexpensive to screen many plates
• Get results quickly (in most cases, within a few
hours)
• Potential drawbacks:
– Qualitative results only
– More manipulations required than for in vivo assay
Liquid culture ONPG VI.D • For assaying a small number of selected transformants
• Less expensive than CPRG or Galacton-StarTM
• Potential drawbacks:
– May not be sensitive enough to quantify weak or
transient two-hybrid interactions
Liquid culture CPRG VI.E • For assaying a small number of selected transformants
• 10-times more sensitive than ONPG
• Potential drawbacks:
– Less reproducible than ONPG for strong positive
colonies because of CPRG’s fast reaction rate
Liquid culture Chemiluminescent VI.F • For assaying a small number of selected transformants
(Galacton-StarTM) • The most sensitive β-gal substrate
• Potential drawbacks:
– Relatively expensive
– Requires luminometer or scintillation counter
– Can give high background
B. In vivo Plate Assay Using X-gal in the Medium (For LexA Systems only)
Reagents and Materials Required:
• Appropriate SD agar plates containing X-gal (80 mg/L) and 1X BU salts (Appendix C.A).
Notes:
• BU salts are included in the medium to maintain the optimum pH for β-galactosidase and to provide the
phosphate needed for the assay.
• The X-gal should be incorporated into the medium before the plates are poured. If the X-gal is spread over
the surface of the agar plates, it can result in uneven distribution and thus localized variations in X-gal
concentration. Also, the extra liquid on the plate surface (from spreading the X-gal) may lead to uneven
spreading of the cell suspension and will delay absorption of the liquid.
• X-gal is heat-labile and will be destroyed if added to hot (i.e.>55°C) medium.
• Prepare the required number of plates in advance. Allow plates to dry (unsleeved) at room temperature for
2–3 days or at 30°C for 3 hr prior to spreading or streaking the cells. Excess moisture on the agar surface
can lead to uneven spreading of cells.
1. For best results use fresh colonies (i.e., grown at 30°C for 2–4 days), 1–3 mm in
diameter.
Notes:
• If only a few colonies are to be assayed, streak them (or spread them in small patches) directly onto master
SD selection agar plates. Incubate the plates at 30°C for an additional 1–2 days, and then proceed with the
β-galactosidase assay below.
• Use the SD selection medium appropriate for your system and plasmids. When testing LexA transformants,
be sure to use gal/raff induction medium.
2. Prepare Z buffer/X-gal solution as described in Appendix D.
3. For each plate of transformants to be assayed, presoak a sterile Whatman No. 5 or VWR
grade 410 filter by placing it in 2.5–5 ml of Z buffer/X-gal solution in a clean 100- or
150-mm plate.
4. Using forceps, place a clean, dry filter over the surface of the plate of colonies to be
assayed. Gently rub the filter with the side of the forceps to help colonies cling to the
filter.
5. Poke holes through the filter into the agar in three or more asymmetric locations to orient
the filter to the agar.
6. When the filter has been evenly wetted, carefully lift it off the agar plate with forceps and
transfer it (colonies facing up) to a pool of liquid nitrogen. Using the forceps, completely
submerge the filters for 10 sec.
Note: Liquid nitrogen should be handled with care; always wear thick gloves and goggles.
7. After the filter has frozen completely (~10 sec), remove it from the liquid nitrogen and
allow it to thaw at room temperature. (This freeze/thaw treatment is to permeabilizes
the cells.)
8. Carefully place the filter, colony side up, on the presoaked filter (from Step C.3). Avoid
trapping air bubbles under or between the filters.
9. Incubate the filters at 30°C (or room temperature) and check periodically for the appearance
of blue colonies.
Notes:
• The time it takes colonies producing β-galactosidase to turn blue varies, typically from 30 min to 8 hr in a
library screening. Prolonged incubation (>8 hr) may give false positives.
• Yeast transformed with the β-galactosidase positive control plasmid will turn blue within 20–30 min. Most
yeast reporter strains cotransformed with the positive controls for a two-hybrid interaction give a positive
blue signal within 60 min. CG-1945 cotransformed with the control plasmids may take an additional 30 min
to develop. If the controls do not behave as expected, check the reagents and repeat the assay.
10. Identify the β-galactosidase-producing colonies by aligning the filter to the agar plate
using the orienting marks. Pick the corresponding positive colonies from the original
plates to fresh medium. If the entire colony was lifted onto the filter, incubate the original
plate for 1–2 days to regrow the colony.
1. Prepare 5-ml overnight cultures in liquid SD medium as described in Chapter III.A.3. Use the
SD selection medium appropriate for your system and plasmids.
Note: Be sure to use SD medium that will maintain selection on the plasmids used.
2. Vortex the overnight culture tube for 0.5–1 min to disperse cell clumps. Immediately
gently.
20. Incubate at room temperature (20°–25°C) for 60 min.
Note: Light signals produced during this incubation are stable for >1 hr; therefore, detection can be performed
1–2 hr after the incubation.
21. Centrifuge tubes at 14,000 rpm (16,000 x g) for 1 min at 4°C. (If you are using microtiter
plates, centrifuge plates at 1,000 x g for 5 min in a specially adapted rotor.) Proceed
directly to the appropriate detection steps for your assay: Step 22, 23, 24, or 27.
22. Detection using a tube luminometer
a. Turn on the tube luminometer. Set the integration time for 5 sec.
b. Calibrate the luminometer according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
c. If the sample is not already in a tube suitable for luminometer readings, transfer the
entire solution from (Step 21) to an appropriate tube. Do not disturb the pellet.
d. Place one sample at a time in the luminometer compartment and record the light emission
(RLU) as a 5-sec integral. Use your blank sample as a reference when interpreting the
data.
23. Detection using a plate luminometer
After Step 21, simply record light signals as 5-sec integrals.
24. Detection using a scintillation counter
a. Transfer the entire solution from Step 21 to a 0.5-ml microcentrifuge tube.
Note: Plan to use scintillation counter adaptors that keep the tubes upright.
b. Place the tube in the washer of the scintillation counter adaptor and place the adaptor
in the machine’s counting rack. Set the integration time for at least 15 sec.
Note: Integration times <15 sec may not produce accurate results.
c. To detect chemiluminescent signals, use a single-photon-count program. Consult your
scintillation counter’s manufacturer for further information about this software.
25. For detection methods described in Steps 22–24: Calculate the β-galactosidase activity in
terms of RLU/OD600 unit of cell culture. (Note that Miller unit calculations are not possible
using these methods.)
26. [Optional] If you have set up β-galactosidase standards, prepare a standard curve of RLU
vs. the amount of β-galactosidase. Estimate the quantity of β-galactosidase in the unknown
samples using the standard curve. Determine the amount of enzyme per OD600 unit of
cell culture. The final OD600 units of cells assayed per sample is calculated as follows:
OD600 (from Step 5) x vol (from Step 18) x conc. factor (from Step 9)
27. Detection by exposure of x-ray film
Light emission can also be recorded by exposure of x-ray film to reaction samples in
opaque 96-well flat-bottom microtiter plates. The relative intensity of the resulting spots
on the film can be estimated by comparison to positive and negative controls. Note that
x-ray film is several orders of magnitude less sensitive than a luminometer or scintillation
counter.
Overlay the microtiter plate with x-ray film, cover the film with plastic wrap, and place a heavy
object such as a book on top to hold the film in place. Expose the film at room temperature
for 5–30 min.
Note: To compare samples accurately, they must be within the linear response capability of the x-ray film. We
therefore recommend that you obtain several different exposures.
Preparation of Samples
1. Inoculate 2–5 ml of liquid synthetic dropout (SD) medium, containing the appropriate
dropout supplements, with a yeast colony expressing the pair of proteins being analyzed.
It is advisable to set up triplicate cultures for each type of yeast colony being analyzed.
Fresh (one- to three-week-old) colonies will give best results for liquid culture inoculation.
A single colony may be used for the inoculation if it is 2–3 mm in diameter. Scrape the
entire colony into the medium. If the colonies on the master plate are smaller than 2
mm, transfer several colonies into the medium.
Examples:
• For AH109 and Y190 cotransformants expressing interacting pairs of GAL4 BD and AD fusion proteins,
inoculate into SD/–His/–Leu/–Trp.
• For AH109 andY190 cotransformants expressing non-interacting pairs of fusion protein constructs, inoculate
into SD/–Leu/–Trp.
• For Y187 tranformants expressing interacting or non-interacting proteins, inoculate into SD/–Leu/–Trp.
• For non-transformed AH109, Y187, and Y190 host strains, inoculate into SD/–Ura.
2. Incubate at 30°C overnight (~16–18 hr) with shaking (250 rpm).
3. Vortex the cell culture tube for 0.5–1 min to disperse cell clumps, then transfer 1 ml of
the suspension to a clean cuvette and record the OD600. For accuracy, the OD600 should
lie between 0.5–1.0. Dilute the cell suspension if necessary; remember to account for the
dilution factor when making your final calculations (Step 11, below).
4. Place 1.0 ml of culture into a 1.5-ml microcentrifuge tube. Centrifuge at 14,000 rpm
(10,000 x g) for 2 min or until the cells are completely pelleted.
Note: It is important to ensure that cells and cellular debris are completely pelleted to minimize intereference
from light scattering in the colorimetric assay below.
5. Carefully transfer the supernatant to a clean tube and store at room temperature for use in
Step 6, below.
Note: To minimize the loss of enzyme activity, we suggest proceeding with the colorimetric assay immediately
once the cell-free superantant has been isolated.
Colorimetric Assay
Below we provide protocols for 1-ml and 200-µl assays. If you have access to a spectrophotometer
equipped to read microtiter plates, you may find it more convenient to use the 200-µl assay
protocol, which is intended for use with 96-well, flat-bottom microtiter plates.
Note: The experimental conditions and volumes of reagents used throughout the α-Galactosidase Quanitative Assay
have been carefully tested and optimized for use in the 1-ml and 200-µl assay formats described below. Please
follow as directed. Though we do not recommend changing the actual volumes of reagents used in the colorimetric
assay, if the signal from an experimental sample exceeds the linear range of the assay, you can dilute the media
supernatant before transferring an aliquot to the reaction tube or well. Remember to correct for individual sample
volumes and dilutions when tabulating final results at Step 11.
5. Prepare a sufficient amount of Assay Buffer for all samples including controls, and allow
to equilibrate to room temperature.
Assay Scale
200-µl 1-ml
6. Transfer cell culture medium supernatant (from Step 4) 16 µl 8 µl
into a 1.5-ml microcentrifuge tube or into a well of a
clear microtiter platea.
7. Add Assay Buffer to each sample. 48 µl 24 µl
8. Incubate at 30°C for 60 min. Be sure to cover
microtiter plates with a lid or parafilm to prevent
evaporation.
9. Terminate the reaction by adding Stop Solution. 136 µl of 10X 960 µl of 1X
Note: Use 1X Stop Solution for 1-ml assays and
10X Stop Solution for 200-µl assays.
10. Record the optical density of each sample at 96-well plate 1.5-ml cuvette
410 nm (OD410)b.
a
Add a corresponding volume of sterile, unused culture media to the reagent blank.
b
Zero the spectrophotometer using the reagent blank and measure the OD410 of the experimental and control
samples relative to the blank.
11. Calculate α-galactosidase units. One unit of α-galactosidase is defined as the amount
of enzyme that hydrolyzes 1 µmole p-nitrophenyl-α-d-galactoside to p-nitrophenol and
d-galactose in 1 min at 30°C in acetate buffer, pH 4.5 (Lazo et al., 1978).
α-galactosidase
[milliunits/(ml x cell)] = OD410 x Vf x 1,000/[(ε x b) x t x Vi x OD600]
t = elapsed time (in min) of incubation
Vf = final volume of assay (200 µl or 992 µl)
Vi = volume of culture medium supernatant added (16 µl or 8 µl)
OD600 = optical density of overnight culturea
ε x b = p-nitrophenol molar absorbtivityb at 410 nm x the light path (cm)
= 10.5 (ml/µmol) for 200-µl formatb,c
= 16.9 (ml/µmol) for 1-ml format where b = 1 cmb,d
The optical density at 600 nm, recorded in Step 2, is used to normalize the OD410 of different media samples to
a
A. General Information
Isolating plasmid DNA from yeast is not trivial, primarily because of the tough cell wall.
Furthermore, the relatively large size (>6 kb) and low copy number (~50/cell) of some yeast
plasmids results in very low DNA yields, regardless of the plasmid isolation method used. In
addition, plasmid DNA isolated from yeast is often contaminated by genomic DNA because
yeast contain ~3X as much genomic DNA as E. coli, and the isolation method breaks the
yeast chromosomes and releases them from cellular material.
There are several yeast plasmid isolation procedures currently in use. The various protocols
differ primarily in the method used to break the cell walls. Here we provide the protocol that
we optimized for ourYeastmakerYeast Plasmid Isolation Kit (Cat No. 630441).This procedure,
which was modified from the method of Ling et al. (1995), uses extensive digestion with
lyticase to weaken the cell walls and SDS to burst the resulting spheroplasts. The DNA preps
can be cleaned up using either CHROMA SPINTM Columns or phenol:chloroform extraction
followed by ethanol precipitation. If CHROMA SPINTM Columns are used, this method takes
<2 hr from cell pellets to purified plasmid, and is simple enough to be easily adapted for
processing many samples simultaneously.
This purification method yields DNA of sufficient purity for use as a PCR template (Chapter
VIII) or for transforming E. coli (Chapter VII.C). However, if you need a large quantity of
plasmid, or very pure plasmid DNA, such as for sequencing or restriction enzyme digestion,
you will have to transform E. coli and prepare plasmid using standard methods (Sambrook
et al., 1989).
• Appropriate SD liquid or agar medium to keep selection on the plasmids (Appendix C.A;
Appendix E).
• Sterile, 1.5-ml microcentrifuge tubes (or a 96-tube microtiter array, multichannel pipettors,
and centrifuge adaptor for multiwell plates).
• 20% SDS
• Lyticase Solution (5 units/µl in TE buffer; store at 4°C for up to 2 months or at –20°C for
up to 6 months. If colloidal material precipitates, mix the solution by inversion before
using.)
• Recommended: CHROMA SPIN-1000 DEPC-H2O Columns (Cat No. 636093) and 2-ml
centrifuge tubes for use with the columns
• If you do not use CHROMA SPIN Columns, you will need materials to perform
phenol:chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation:
• Phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1; See Sambrook et al., 1989, for information
on preparing neutralized phenol solutions)
• 10 M ammonium acetate
• 95–100% ethanol
Note: The amount of plasmid DNA recovered is small relative to the contaminating genomic
DNA; therefore, it cannot be measured by A260 or seen on an agarose gel.
Notes:
• If you are using an endA+ bacterial strain such as KC8 or HB101 as the host strain, extra care must be
taken when preparing plasmid DNA because of the presence of endonuclease A. (See Sambrook et al.
[1989]1:1.22–1.23.)
• Boiling lysis is not recommended for isolation of plasmids from endA+ bacteria.
• If you are using a commercial plasmid preparation kit, follow the manufacturer’s directions for host
strains that are endA+.
• If you plan to use the plasmid for sequencing or other applications requiring highly purified DNA, the
plasmid should be extracted with phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol and precipitated with ethanol
before use. Alternatively, CHROMA SPINTM+TE-400 Columns (Cat No. K1323-1) may be used to purify
the plasmid.
b. To verify that you have obtained the correct plasmid, amplify the insert by PCR, digest
it with Alu I or Hae III, and run a small sample on an agarose/EtBr gel. Compare the
restriction digestion pattern with that of the original clone isolated from yeast.
4. Troubleshooting tips
a. If you do not obtain any transformants, you may need to improve the transformation
effiency of the cells.
• If you performed a nutritional selection on M9 minimal medium, repeat the
transformation, but plate the cells on LB/amp instead. (The recovery of new
transformants is generally better on on LB/amp than on M9 medium.)Then replica
plate the Ampr transformants to the appropriate M9 minimal medium for selection
of the desired plasmid and to verify that the undesired plasmid(s) have been lost.
Note that it takes somewhat longer to see colonies on M9 medium than on LB.
• If you are not already doing so, use electrotransformation rather than chemical
transformation; higher transformation efficiencies are usually obtained with
electroporation.
• Use competent cells that are known to be transformed with a very high efficiency.
(Both chemically competent and electrocompetent cells are available from
Clontech.)
b. If you try the measures recommended in Section 4.a above and still do not recover any
E. coli transformants the problem may be the plasmid preparation or the plasmid
itself.
• The yeast plasmid preparation may have no plasmid DNA in it. Check the medium
you used for the overnight cultures. It is important to use a medium that maintains
selection on the desired plasmid. The working stock plate used as your inoculum
source should also keep selection on the plasmid. When you repeat the plasmid
isolation procedure, be sure to include the freeze/thaw cycle at Step VII.B.5 to
ensure complete cell lysis.
• Check the concentration of total DNA in your plasmid prep using absorbance at 260
nm or by running a small sample (10 µl) on a gel. Although plasmid DNA makes up
only a small fraction of the total DNA, you can at least confirm that you have DNA
in your prep. The larger chromosomal DNA fragments should be visible on a 1%
agarose/EtBr gel. (The limit of detection with EtBr staining is ~4 ng [Sambrook et
al., 1989, Appendix E.5].)
• Even if you have a substantial amount of DNA in your prep, there is a remote
possibility that the plasmid of interest has integrated into the yeast chromosome
and therefore cannot replicate autonomously when introduced into E. coli. If
the plasmid’s insert can be amplified by PCR (Chapter VIII), it may be possible to
recover the insert by subcloning from the PCR product.
• The plasmid may encode a protein that is toxic to E. coli. Again, it may be possible
to recover the insert by subcloning the PCR-amplified fragment.
A. General Information
Sometimes a two-hybrid library screening results in many, even hundreds, of positive
candidate clones. However, a few abundant insert sequences may account for the majority.
Sorting colonies into groups will eliminate duplicates bearing the same plasmid insert and
will save time in the subsequent analysis. The cDNA inserts from all plasmids encoding
candidate interacting proteins can be amplified by PCR and sorted into groups based on
restriction digestion patterns. After colonies have been sorted, a representative clone from
each group can be transferred to a new master plate for further analysis.
To ensure efficient amplification of all inserts, regardless of size, we strongly recommend
the use of long-distance (LD) PCR (Barnes, 1994; Cheng et al., 1994) with the Advantage®
2 Polymerase Mix (Cat No. 639201). The Advantage® 2 PCR Kit (Cat No. 639206) provides
a Advantage® 2 Polymerase Mix (which includes TaqStartTM Antibody), a 10X Advantage® 2
PCR Buffer, 50X dNTP, a positive control template, a mix of positive control primers, and a
complete User Manual.
Clontech offers PCR primers designed to amplify inserts cloned into Matchmaker Two-
Hybrid System vectors. The insert-screening amplimers hybridize to sequences flanking the
multiple cloning site (MCS) of the respective vectors. If you purchase Matchmaker LD-Insert
Screening Amplimers, we recommend that you use the LD-PCR protocol that accompanies
that product. However, LD-Insert Screening Amplimers can also be used in conventional
PCR using a single DNA polymerase to amplify inserts up to 3 kb (e.g., Ausubel et al., [1995]
Chapters 15.1 & 15.3).
• Matchmaker AD LD-Insert Screening Amplimers (Cat No. 630433) are for amplifying inserts
in the GAL4 AD cloning vectors pGAD10, pGAD424, pGAD GL, pGAD GH, pGADT7, pACT,
and pACT2.
• Matchmaker pB42AD LD-Insert Screening Amplimers (Cat No. 9108-1) are for amplifying
inserts in the LexA system AD cloning vector pB42AD.
• Matchmaker DNA-BDVector Insert Screening Amplimers (Cat No. 5417-1) are for conventional
PCR amplification of inserts in the GAL4 DNA-BD cloning vectors pGBT9, pGBKT7, pAS2,
and pAS2-1.
• Matchmaker LexA DNA-BD Insert Screening Amplimers (Cat No. 9109-1) are for conventional
PCR amplification of inserts in pLexA and pGilda.
B. Tips For Successful PCR of Yeast Plasmid Templates
1. Optimization of thermal cycling parameters
The optimal cycling parameters will vary with different templates, primers, experimental
protocols, tubes, and thermal cyclers. Refer to the LD-Insert Screening Amplimers
User Manual, Ausubel et al. (1995), or Roux (1995) for suggestions on optimizing PCR
conditions. In some cases, “touchdown” PCR may be needed. We have found that
touchdown PCR significantly improves the specificity of many PCR reactions in a wide
variety of applications (Don et al., 1991; Roux, 1995). Briefly, touchdown PCR involves
using an annealing/extension temperature that is several degrees (typically 3–10°C) higher
than the Tm of the primers during the initial PCR cycles (typically 5–10). The annealing/
extension temperature is then reduced to the primer Tm for the remaining PCR cycles.
The change can be performed either in a single step or in increments over several cycles;
for example, use 72°C for the first five cycles, 70°C for the next 5 cycles, and 68°C for the
remaining cycles.
2. Primer design
Primer design is the single largest variable in PCR applications and the single most
critical factor in determining the success or failure of PCR reactions. For best results,
we recommend that you use LD-Insert-Screening Amplimers from Clontech. However,
if you design your own primers, be sure to use sequences flanking the MCS. Always
check and recheck your primer design before constructing or ordering primers.
Length and G/C content: In general, primers should have a Tm of at least 70°C to achieve
b. Pipetting
Because of the small volumes used in PCR experiments and the potential for tube-
to-tube variation, careful pipetting technique is extremely important. Always be sure
that no extra solution is on the outside of the pipette tip before transfer. When adding
solution to a tube, immerse the tip into the reaction mixture, deliver the solution,
and rinse the pipette tip by pipetting up and down several times.
c. Use a Master Mix
To reduce tube-to-tube variation, use a master mix whenever you set up multiple PCR
reactions. If you wish, include the primers in the master mix also. If you are setting
up several sets of parallel samples, assemble multiple master mixes (e.g., each with
a different set of primers). The master mix should be thoroughly mixed before use
(i.e., vortexed without bubbling).
d. Always include positive and negative controls (i.e., H2O instead of DNA template).
Positive controls are provided with all of Clontech’s Insert Screening Amplimer
Sets.
1. If you have not done so already, collect the colonies to be screened onto a master plate
in a grid pattern to facilitate future identification of the colonies. Include a positive and
negative control on each plate. Since this will be your master plate, it is important to
use the appropriate SD agar medium to maintain selection on all plasmids (including
any reporter plasmid). Incubate plate at 30°C for 2–4 days until colonies appear.
2. Prepare sorbitol/EDTA/DTT solution.
3. For each plate of colonies to be screened, presoak a Whatman 3 MM paper in the sorbitol/
EDTA/DTT solution.
4. Using forceps, place a sterile, prelabeled, dry nylon membrane over the surface
of the plate of colonies to be assayed. Gently rub the membrane with the side of the
forceps to help colonies cling to the membrane.
5. Poke holes through the membrane into the agar in three or more assymetric locations
to orient the membrane to the master plate.
6. When the membrane has been evenly wetted, carefully lift it off the agar plate
with forceps and allow it to air dry briefly (~5 min). Place membrane, colony-side-up, on
a presoaked sheet of Whatman 3 MM paper (from Step 3 above) and incubate for ~30
min.
7. Optional: Place membranes at –70°C for 5 min, then thaw at room temperature for one
or more cycles to facilitate the disruption of the cell walls.
8. Dilute the β-glucuronidase 1:500 in sorbitol/EDTA. Use 2 µl (of the 100,000 units/ml
β−glucuronidase stock) per ml of sorbitol/EDTA to give a final concentration of 200 units/
ml). Allow 3–5 ml of diluted β-glucuronidase per filter to be screened.
9. For each membrane to be screened, cut another piece of Whatman 3 MM paper to
fit inside a 100-mm petri dish. Place the paper disc in the dish containing the diluted
β-glucuronidase to saturate the paper. Remove excess liquid.
10. Carefully layer the nylon membrane, colony side up, on top of the β-glucuronidase-soaked
filter. Avoid trapping air bubbles in between the two layers. Cover the dish. Incubate the
membrane on the filter for up to 6 hr at 37°C until >80% of the cells lack a cell wall.
Note: The extent of cell wall removal can be determined by removing a small quantity of cells from the filter
to a drop of sorbitol/EDTA on a microscope slide, and observing directly with a phase-contrast microscope at
≥60X magnification. Cells lacking a cell wall are nonrefractile.
11. Place membrane on Whatman 3 MM paper saturated with 0.5 M NaOH for 8–10
min.
12. Place membrane on Whatman 3 MM paper saturated with 0.5 M Tris-HCl (pH
7.5)/6X SSC for 5 min. Repeat step 12 with a second sheet of presoaked Whatman 3 MM
paper.
13. Place membrane on Whatman 3 MM paper saturated with 2X SSC for 5 min. Then
place membrane on dry Whatman paper to air dry for 10 min.
14. Bake membrane at 80°C for 90 min in a vacuum oven or UV cross-link.
15. Proceed as for bacterial filter hybridization (Ausubel et al., 1994).
c. Incubate the plate at 30°C for 2–3 days or until colonies appear.
d. Using sterile toothpicks or pipette tips, transfer 20–30 individual colonies (in an
orderly grid fashion) to appropriate SD selection plates to verify that they have lost
the unwanted plasmid and retained the plasmid of interest.
Note: Store the yeast segregants on the appropriate SD selection plates wrapped in Parafilm at 4°C for
up to two weeks.
2. Cycloheximide counterselection of yeast segregants
Some yeast host strains, such as CG-1945 and Y190, carry the cyhr2 mutant allele and
are cycloheximide resistant (CyhR; C. Giroux, personal communication, for CG-1945,
and Harper et al., 1993, for Y190). The wild-type CYHs2 gene is dominant to the cyhr2
mutant allele. Thus, when transformed with a plasmid such as pAS2-1 that contains the
wild-type CYHs2 gene, the host strain will become sensitive to cycloheximide; this holds
true for a CyhR host strain cotransformed with a CYHs2-bearing plasmid and another
plasmid that does not carry the CYHs2. gene. Therefore, one can effectively select for
yeast cells that have spontaneously lost the CYHs2-bearing plasmid while retaining the
other plasmid, simply by plating the cotransformants on the appropiate SD medium
containing cycloheximide.
Note: The CYH2 gene encodes the L29 protein of the yeast ribosome. Cycloheximide, a drug which blocks
polypeptide elongation during translation, prevents the growth of cells that contain the wild-type CYH2 gene.
Cycloheximide resistance results from a single amino acid change in the CYH2 protein. Cells containing both the
sensitive (wild-type) and the resistant (mutant) CYH2 alleles fail to grow on medium containing cycloheximide.
Therefore, the loss of a CYH2-containing plasmid can be selected for directly if the host carries the resistant
allele chromosomally (Guthrie & Fink [1991], pp 306–307).
a. From each of the restreaked (CyhS) cotransformants of interest, pick a colony, 1–3 mm
in diameter, and resuspend it in 200 µl of sterile H2O. Vortex thoroughly to disperse
the cells.
Note: Do not patch or streak cells from the colony over to the cycloheximide-containing medium. Cells
transferred in this way are at too high a density for the cycloheximide selection to work.
b. Spread 100 µl of the cell suspension onto an SD/–Leu/+cycloheximide plate. Also
spread 100 µl of a 1:100 dilution.
Note: The concentration of cycloheximide to use in the medium depends on the host strain. For example,
use 1.0 µg/ml for CG-1945; 10.0 µg/ml for Y190.
c. Incubate the plate at 30°C until individual CyhR colonies appear. (This usually takes 3–5
days.)
d. Transfer the CyhR colonies to appropriate SD selection plates to verify that they
have lost the CYHs2-bearing plasmid and retained the plasmid of interest. Refer to
Appendix E for information on yeast plasmid transformation/selection markers.
Note: These yeast clones are referred to as CyhR segregants. Store them on the appropriate SD selection
plates wrapped in Parafilm at 4°C for up to two weeks.
C. Yeast Mating
Yeast mating is a convenient method of introducing two different plasmids into the same
host cells, and, in some applications, can be used as a convenient alternative to yeast
cotransformations (Bendixen et al., 1994; Harper et al., 1993; Finley & Brent, 1994). See
Guthrie & Fink (1991) or Pringle et al. (1997) for information on the biology of yeast mating.
The following small-scale protocol works well for creating diploids by yeast mating. If you
wish to screen a Pretransformed Matchmaker Libary using yeast mating, please refer to the
User Manual provided with those libraries for an optimized, library-scale mating protocol.
1. Preparation for yeast mating
a. If you have not done so already, generate an appropriate yeast strain containing the
plasmid of interest.
b. Transform the chosen mating partner separately with the plasmids you wish to test
in combination with the plasmid of interest. Be sure to include transformations with
the appropriate negative and positive control plasmids, if applicable.
X. References
Other References:
Aho, S., Arffman, A., Pummi, T. & Uitto, J. (1997) A novel reporter gene MEL1 for the yeast two-hybrid system. Anal.
Biochem. 253: 270–272.
Alexandre, C., Grueneberg, D. A. & Gilman, M. Z.(1993) Studying Heterologous Transcription Factors in Yeast. METHODS:
A Companion to Methods in Enzymology 5:147–155.
Ammerer, G. (1983) Expression of Genes in Yeast Using the ADCI Promoter. Methods in Enzymology 101:192–201.
Ausubel, F. M., Brent, R., Kingston, R. E., Moore, D. D., Seidman, J. G., Smith, J. A., Struhl, K. (1994) Current Protocols in
Molecular Biology (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.) Vol. 1, Chap. 5.
Barnes, W. M. (1994) PCR amplification of up to 35-kb DNA with high fidelity and high yield from λ bacteriophage templates.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:2216–2220.
Beier, D. R. & Young, E. T. (1982) Characterization of a regulatory region upstream of the ADR2 locus of S. cerevisiae.,
Nature 300:724–728.
Bendixen, C., Gangloff, S. & Rothstein, R. (1994) A yeast mating-selection scheme for detection of protein-protein
interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:1778–1779.
Bolivar, F. & Backman, K. (1979) Plasmids of Escherichia coli as cloning vectors. Methods Enzymol. 68:245–267.
Breeden, L. & Nasmyth, K. (1985) Regulation of the Yeast HO Gene. Cold Spring Harbor Symposium Quant. Biol.
50:643–650.
Campbell, K. S., Buder, A. & Deuschle, U. (1995) Interactions between the amino-terminal domain of p56lck and cytoplasmic
domains of CD4 and CD8-alpha in yeast. Eur. J. Immunol. 25:2408-2412.
Campbell, K.S., Buder, A., Deuschle, U. (1995) Interaction of p56lck with CD4 in the yeast two-hybrid system. Ann NY Acad
Sci. 766:89-92.
Cheng, S., Fockler, C., Barnes, W. M. & Higuchi, R. (1994) Effective amplification of long targets from cloned inserts and
human genomic DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. USA 91:5695–5699.
Chien, C. T., Bartel, P. L., Sternglanz, R. & Fields, S. (1991) The two-hybrid system: A method to identify and clone genes
for proteins that interact with a protein of interest. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 88:9578–9582.
Chou, Q., Russell, M., Birch, D., Raymond, J. & Bloch, W. (1992) Prevention of pre-PCR mispriming and primer dimerization
improves low-copy-number amplifications. Nucleic Acid Res. 20:1717–1723.
X. References continued
Chuang, S.-E., Chen, A.-L. & Chao, C.-C. (1995) Growth of E. coli at low temperature dramatically increases the transformation
frequency by electroporation. Nucleic Acids Res. 23:1641.
D’Aquila, R.T., Bechtel, L. J., Videler, J. A., Eron, J. J., Gorczyca, P. & Kaplan, J. C. (1991) Maximizing sensitivity and specificity
of PCR by preamplificiation heating. Nucleic Acids Res. 19:3749.
Don, R. H., Cox, P. T., Wainwright, B. J., Baker, K. & Mattick, J. S. (1991) ‘Touchdown’ PCR to circumvent spurious priming
during gene amplification. Nucleic Acids Res. 19:4008.
Dower, W. J., Miller, J. F. & Ragsdale, W. W. (1988) High efficiency transformation of E. coli by high voltage electroporation.
Nucleic Acids Res. 16:6127–6145.
Durfee, T., Becherer, K., Chen, P. L., Yeh, S. H., Yang, Y., Kilbburn, A. E., Lee, W. H. & Elledge, S. J. (1993) The retinoblastoma
protein associates with the protein phosphatase type 1 catalytic subunit. Genes Devel. 7:555–569.
Ebina, Y., Takahara, Y., Kishi, F. & Nakazawa, A. (1983) LexA protein is a repressor of the colicin E1 gene. J. Biol. Chem.
258:13258–13261.
Estojak, J., Brent, R. & Golemis, E. A. (1995) Correlation of two-hybrid affinity data with in vitro measurements. Mol. Cell
Biol. 15:5820–5829.
Feilotter, H. E., Hannon, G. J., Ruddel, C. J. & Beach, D. (1994) Construction of an improved host strain for two hybrid
screening. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:1502–1503.
Finley, Jr., R. L. & Brent, R. (1994) Interaction mating reveals binary and ternary connections between Drosophila cell cycle
regulators. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:12980–12984.
Flick, J. S. & Johnston, M. (1990) Two systems of glucose repression of the GAL1 promoter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Mol. Cell. Biol.10(9):4757–4769.
Gietz, D., St. Jean, A., Woods, R. A., & Schiestl, R. H. (1992) Improved method for high efficiency transformation of intact
yeast cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 20:1425.
Gimeno, R. E., Espenshade, P., & Kaiser, C. A. (1996) COPII coat subunit interactions: Sec24p and Sec23p bind to adjacent
regions of Sec16p. Mol. Biol. Cell 7:1815-23.
Giniger, E., Varnum, S. M. & Ptashne, M. (1985) Specific DNA binding GAL4, a positive regulatory protein of yeast. Cell 40:
767–74.
Giniger, E. & Ptashne, M. (1988) Cooperative DNA binding of the yeast transcriptional activator GAL4. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA 85:382–386.
Golemis, E. A., Gyuris, J. & Brent, R. (1996) Analysis of protein interactions; and interaction trap/two-hybrid systems to
identify interacting proteins. In Current Protocols in Molecular Biology (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.), Ch. 20.0 and 20.1.
Guthrie, C. & Fink, G. R. (1991) Guide to yeast genetics and molecular biology. In Methods in Enzymology (Academic
Press, San Diego)194:1–932.
Harper, J. W., Adami, G. R., Wei, N., Keyomarsi, K. & Elledge, S. J. (1993) The p21 Cdk-interacting protein Cip1 is a potent
inhibitor of G1 cyclin-dependent kinases. Cell 75:805–816.
Heslot, H. & Gaillardin, C., eds. (1992) Molecular Biology and Genetic Engineering of Yeasts, CRC Press, Inc.
Hill, J., Donald, K. A. & Griffiths, D. E. (1991) DMSO-enhanced whole cell yeast transformation. Nucleic Acids Res.
19:5791.
Hope, I. A. & Struhl, K. (1986) Functional dissection of a eukaryotic transcriptional protein, GNN4 of yeast. Cell
46:885–894.
Ito, H., Fukada,Y., Murata, K. & Kimura, A. (1983)Transformation of intact yeast cells treated with alkali cations. J. Bacteriol.
153:163–168.
Iwabuchi, K., Li, B., Bartel, P. & Fields, S. (1993) Use of the two-hybrid system to identify the domain of p53 involved in
oligomerization. Oncogene 8:1693–1696.
Iyer, V. & Struhl, K. (1995) Mechanism of differential utilization of the his3 TR and TC TATA elements. Mol. Cell. Biol.
15:7059-7066.
James, P., Halladay, J. & Craig, E. A. (1996) Genomic libraries and a host strain designed for highly efficient two-hybrid
selection in yeast. Genetics 144:1425–1436.
Johnston, M., Flick, J. S. & Pexton, T. (1994) Multiple mechanisms provide rapid and stringent glucose repression of GAL
gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:3834–3841.
Kaiser, P. & Auer, B. (1993) Rapid shuttle plasmid preparation from yeast cells by transfer to E. coli. BioTechniques
14:552.
Kellogg, D. E., Rybalkin, I., Chen, S., Mukhamedova, N., Vlasik, T., Seibert, P. & Chencik, A. (1994) TaqStart Antibody: Hot
start PCR facilitated by a neutrualizing monoclonal antibody directed against Taq DNA polymerase. BioTechniques
16:1134–1137.
Lazo, P. S., Ochoa, A. G. & Gascón, S. (1978) α-galactosidase (melibiase) from Saccharomyces Carlsbergenesis: Structural
and kinetic properties. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 191:316–324.
X. References continued
Li, B. & Fields, S. (1993) Identification of mutations in p53 that affect its binding to SV40 T antigen by using the yeast
two-hybrid system. FASEB J. 7:957–963.
Li, L., Elledge, S. J., Peterson, C.A., Bales, E. S. & Legerski, R. J. (1994) Specific association between the human DNA repair
proteins XPA and ERCC1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:5012–5016.
Liljeström, P. L. (1985) The nucleotide sequence of the yeast MEL1 gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 13:7257–7268.
Ling, M., Merante, F. & Robinson, B. H. (1995) A rapid and reliable DNA preparation method for screening a large number
of yeast clones by polymerase chain reaction. Nucleic Acids Res. 23:4924–4925.
Liu, J., Wilson,T.E., Milbrandt, J. & Johnston, M. (1993) Identifying DNA-binding sites and analyzing DNA-binding domains
using a yeast selection system. In: Methods: A Companion to Methods in Enzymology 5:125–137.
Louret, O. F., Doignon, F. & Crouzet, M. (1997) Stable DNA binding yeast vector allowing high bait expression for use in
the two-hybrid system. BioTechniques 23: 816–819.
Luo, Y., Vijaychander, S., Stile, J. & Zhu, L. (1996) Cloning and analysis of DNA-binding proteins by yeast one-hybrid and
one-two-hybrid systems. BioTechniques 20:564–568.
Mahadevan, S. & Struhl, K. (1990) Tc, an unusual promoter element required for constitutive transcription of the yeast
HIS3 gene. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10:4447–55.
Marcil, R. & Higgins, D. R. (1992) Direct transfer of plasmid DNA from yeast to E. coli by electroporation. Nucleic Acids Res.
20:917.
Miller, J. H. (1972) Experiments in Molecular Genetics (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY).
Miller, J. H. (1992) In A Short Course in Bacterial Genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor; p.
74.
Post-Beittenmiller, M.A., Hamilton, R.W. & Hopper, J.E. (1984) Regulation of basal and induced levels of the MEL1 transcript
in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell Biol. 4:1238–1245.
Pringle, J. R., Roach, J. R. & Jones, E. W., eds. (1997) The Molecular and Cellular Biology of the Yeast Saccharomyces: Cell
Cycle and Cell Biology (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY).
Printen, J. A., & Sprague, G. F. Jr. (1994) Protein interactions in the yeast pheromone response pathway: Ste5p interacts
with all members of the MAP kinase cascade. Genetics 138:609-619.
Roux, K. H. (1995) Optimization and troubleshooting in PCR. PCR Methos Appl. 4:5185–5194.
Ruohonen, L. Aalto, M. K. & Keränen, S. (1995) Modifications to the ADH1 promoter of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for
efficient production of heterologous proteins. Journal of Biotechnology 39:193–203.
Ruohonen, L., Penttila, M. & Keränen, S. (1991) Optimization of Bacillus α-amylase Production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Yeast 7:337–346.
Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F. & Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory,
Cold Spring Harbor, NY).
Sadowski, I., Niedbala, D., Wood, K. & Ptashne, M. (1991) GAL4 is phosphorylated as a consequence of transcriptional
activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:10510-10514.
Schiestl, R. H. & Gietz, R. D. (1989) High efficiency transformation of intact cells using single stranded nucleic acids as a
carrier. Curr. Genet. 16:339–346.
Schneider, S., Buchert, M. & Hovens, C. M. (1996) An in vitro assay of β-galactosidase from yeast. BioTechniques
20:960–962.
Smirnov, M.N., Smirnov, V.N., Budowsky, E. I., Inge-Vechtomov, S.G. & Serebrjakov, N. G. (1967) Red pigment of adenine-
deficient yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 27:299–304.
Stargell, L. A. & Struhl, K. (1996) Mechanisms of transcriptional activation in vivo: two steps forward. Trends Genet.
12(8):311-315.
Tirode, F., Malaguti, C., Romero, F., Attar, R., Camonis, J. & Egly, J. M. (1997) A conditionally expressed third partner stabilizes
or prevents the formation of a transcriptional activator in a three-hybrid system. J. Biol. Chem. 272: 22995–22999.
Tornow, J. & Santangelo, G. G. (1990) Efficient expression of Saccharomyces cerevisiae glycolytic gene ADH1 is dependent
upon a cis-acting regulatory element (UAS PRG) found initially in genes encoding ribosomal proteins. Gene 90:79–85.
van Aelst, L., Barr, M., Marcus, S., Polverino, A. & Wigler, M. (1993) Complex formation between RAS and RAF and other
protein kinases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:6213–6217.
Weisman, L. S., Bacallao, R. & Wickner, W. (1987) Multiple methods of visualizing the yeast vacuole permit evaluation of
its morphology and inheritance during the cell cycle. J. Cell Biol. 105:1539–1547.
West, R. W. Jr., Yoccum, R. R. & Ptashne, M. (1984) Saccharomyces cerevisiae GAL1-GAL10 Divergent Promoter Region:
Location and Function of the Upstream Activating Sequence UASG Molecular and Cellular Biology 4:2467–2478.
Yoccum, R. R. (1987) The GAL1, 7 and 10 upstream activator sequences are not enhancers, in Biological Research on
Industrial Yeasts. Vol. 3, Stewart, G., Russell, I., Klein, R. & Hiebsch, R., Ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fl; page 61.
Note: Many of these terms have other meanings in different contexts. For brevity, we have included
only definitions relevant to this Yeast Protocols Handbook.
allele: One of two or more forms that can exist at a given genetic locus (e.g., his3-200 is a mutant
allele and HIS3 is a wild-type allele at the his3 locus). In standard yeast nomenclature, mutant
alleles are written in lower case italics, while wild-type alleles are written in upper case italics.
auxotroph: A strain of yeast or other microorganisms that will proliferate only when the medium
is supplemented with some specific nutrient not normally required by the organism. For example,
Trp– yeast strains are auxotrophic for tryptophan (Trp); they require Trp in the medium.
cis-acting element (or cis-acting locus): A DNA sequence that affects the transcriptional activity of
genes located on the same DNA molecule, often via binding of regulatory proteins or factors.
confluent: When yeast or bacterial colonies growing on an agar plate are so numerous that the
edges of the colonies touch each other.
clone: (a) A group of genetically identical cells or individuals derived by asexual division from a
common ancestor. (b) A heterologous cDNA fragment inserted into a vector; also refers to copies of
that original cDNA.
colony: A visible clone of cells growing on solid medium.
diploid: In yeast, a cell having two complete chromosome sets as a result of mating of haploid
a and α strains. A cell can also be diploid for one particular gene or several genes, due to the
presence of plasmids, or as a result of gene duplication.
dropout (DO) supplement: A mixture of several amino acids and nucleosides that must be added
to minimal synthetic medium to support the growth of yeast strains that have defined nutritional
requirements; typically, one or more specific nutrients is left (or “dropped”) out of the DO
supplement so that the resulting synthetic dropout (SD) medium will only support the growth of
yeast that are able to synthesize that nutrient.
gene: (a) The fundamental physical unit of heredity, recognized through its variant alleles; (b) a
DNA sequence that regulates and encodes a functional product, e.g., a polypeptide chain or an
RNA molecule.
genetic complementation: The production of a wild-type phenotype when (a) two different
mutations are combined in a diploid cell; or (b) when a wild-type allele on a plasmid is introduced
into a cell bearing a defective chromosomal allele via yeast mating or transformation.
genome: The entire complement of genetic material in a cell excluding autonomously replicating
plasmids and mitochondrial DNA.
genotype: Generally, a list of mutant alleles and exogenous genetic elements. Wild-type alleles
are sometimes listed as well for clarity in a specific experimental context.
haploid: A cell having one chromosome set. A diploid cell or organism can also be haploid for a
given gene due to chromosomal deletions.
hybridization probe: A defined nucleic acid segment which can be labeled and used to identify
specific DNA clones bearing the complementary sequence via hybridization.
leaky mutant: A mutant that represents a partial rather than a complete inactivation of the wild-
type function; leaky phenotypes can result from a mutation in the coding region or in the promoter
region. In yeast one- and two-hybrid systems, some of the host strains are leaky for expression
of certain auxotrophic markers (for example, HIS3 expression in Y190).
mating types: A genetically haploid state of unicellular organisms that can reproduce sexually by
cellular and nuclear fusion to produce a diploid organism. In S. cerevisiae, there are two mating
types, a and α, which differ only physiologically and not in physical form.
mutant: An organism or cell carrying a mutation.
mutant allele: An allele differing from the allele found in the standard or wild type.
mutation: (a) The process that produces a gene or a chromosome differing from the wild type.
(b) The DNA or amino acid change resulting from such a process.
operator: In bacteria, a DNA region that acts a binding site for a specific repressor protein and
thereby exerts control over transcription of the adjacent structural gene or operon.
operon: In bacteria, a set of adjacent structural genes that are transcribed into a single mRNA
molecule, plus the adjacent regulatory genes that affect transcription of the structural genes.
PCR: Polymerase chain reaction; a process by which a defined segment of DNA is exponentially
replicated in vitro by the action of a thermostable DNA polymerase during repeated cycles of
heating and cooling.
phenotype: The observable properties of an organism determined by the organism’s genetic
constitution (genotype) and the effects of the environment.
plasmid: A genetic element in bacteria or yeast that can replicate autonomously in the host cell.
Some plasmids can also be inserted into the host’s genome in defined natural or experimental
situations, e.g., via transformation of linearized plasmid DNA.
promoter: A DNA sequence to which RNA polymerase complex binds and initiates transcription
of an adjacent structural gene or gene cluster. In yeast, the promoter is typically comprised of at
least one TATA box and other closely associated cis-regulatory elements (e.g., UASs).
prototroph: A strain of yeast or other microorganisms that will proliferate even if a particular
nutrient is not supplied in the medium. For example, Trp– yeast strains are protototrophic for Trp;
they can synthesize their own Trp from other biomolecules and do not require it in the medium. A
prototrophic transformation marker or reporter gene can be used to complement the corresponding
auxotrophic allele in another strain.
segregation: Genetically, the production from a single cell of two daughter cells having distinct
genotypes and phenotypes due to the separation of two alleles of a gene. In yeast, this can occur
during sporulation or in transformant clones as a result of loss of a plasmid.
trans-acting element: A gene that controls transcriptional activity of another gene through a
diffusable gene product (protein) such as a repressor or activator.
transformation: The process of introducing foreign DNA into a cell.
transformation markers: Genetic alleles whose phenotypes identify the presence of a plasmid
introduced into a cell; typically, such markers are genes that complement a nutritional requirement
or confer resistance to an antibiotic.
UAS: Upstream Activating Sequence; yeast DNA sequences that control the initiation of transcription
of adjacent structural genes via binding of specific regulatory proteins. An example is the binding
of the yeast GAL4 transcriptional activator (or DNA-BD) to the UASG of the GAL1 promoter.
wild type: The genotype or phenotype of an organism as it is found in nature or in a standard
laboratory strain.
Allele
Wild type Mutant Phenotype of mutant
TRP1 trp1-901 Trp– Requires tryptophan (Trp) in the medium to grow, i.e., is a
Trp
auxotroph
LEU2 leu2-3, 112 Leu– Requires leucine (Leu) to grow, i.e., is a Leu auxotroph
HIS3 his3-200 His– Requires histidine (His) to grow, i.e., is a His auxotroph
URA3 ura3-52 Ura –
Requires uracil (Ura) to grow, i.e., is a Ura auxotroph
LYS2 lys2-801 Lys– Requires lysine (Lys) to grow, i.e., is a Lys auxotroph
ADE2 ade2-101 Ade Requires adenine (Ade) to grow; i.e., is an Ade auxotroph; in
–
ADE2
Ade+ Confers Ade prototrophy Ade–
• Grows on SD/–Ade • Does not grow on SD/–Ade
• Pink or red colony color
when grown on medium
(such as YPD) low in Ade
a
Relative levels of background expression and reporter gene induction are dependent on the promoter constructs controlling
them. See Chapter II for information on the promoters.
b
5–60 mM 3-AT may be required to suppress leaky HIS3 expression in certain host strains and transformants and to obtain
an accurate His– phenotype.
A. YEAST MEDIA
• YPD medium
YPD Medium (Cat No. 630409) and YPD Agar Medium (Cat No. 630410) are available in powder
form from Clontech. Our YPD Medium is a blend of peptone, yeast extract, and dextrose in
optimal proportions for growth of most strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. See Chapter XI
for ordering information. If you purchase Clontech’sYPD media, prepare the medium according
to the instructions provided. Alternatively, prepare your own YPD mixture as follows:
20 g/L Difco peptone
10 g/L Yeast extract
20 g/L Agar (for plates only)
• [Optional] For adenine-supplemented YPD (YPDA), add 15 ml of a 0.2% adenine hemisulfate
solution per liter of medium (final concentration is 0.003%, in addition to the trace amount
of Ade that is naturally present in YPD). Adenine hemisulfate tolerates autoclaving.
Add H2O to 950 ml. Adjust the pH to 6.5 if necessary, then autoclave. Allow medium to cool
to ~ 55°C and then add dextrose (glucose) to 2% (50 ml of a sterile 40% stock solution). Adjust
the final volume to 1 L if necessary.
Note: If you add the sugar solution before autoclaving, autoclave at 121°C for 15 min; autoclaving at a higher temperature,
for a longer period of time, or repeatedly may cause the sugar solution to darken and will decrease the performance
of the medium. Note that YPD from Clontech already contains glucose.
• [Optional] For kanamycin-containing medium, prepareYPD orYPDA as above. After autoclaved
medium has cooled to 55°C, add 0.2–0.3 ml of 50 mg/ml kanamycin (final concentration
10–15 mg/L).
• SD medium
Minimal SD Base and Minimal SD Agar Base, either with dextrose (glucose), or galactose +
raffinose, are available from Clontech in powder form. (See Chapter XI for ordering information.)
If you purchase Clontech’s Minimal SD Base, prepare your SD/Dropout (DO) medium according to
the instructions provided. For example, to prepare SD/–Leu/–Trp agar, you will need to combine
SD Minimal Agar Base (Cat No. 630412) with –Leu/–Trp DO Supplement (Cat No. 630412).
Alternatively, you can purchase yeast nitrogen base from another supplier (e.g., Difco Cat No.
0919-15-3) and prepare SD/DO medium as follows:
6.7 g Yeast nitrogen base without amino acids
20 g Agar (for plates only)
850 ml H2O
100 ml of the appropriate sterile 10X Dropout Solution
• Adjust the pH to 5.8 if necessary, and autoclave. Allow medium to cool to ~ 55°C before
adding 3-AT, cycloheximide, additional adenine, or X-gal (see below).
• Add the appropriate sterile carbon source, usually dextrose (glucose) to 2%, unless specified
otherwise for your application. Adjust the final volume to 1 L if necessary.
Notes:
• If you add the sugar solution before autoclaving, autoclave at 121°C for 15 min; autoclaving at a higher temperature,
for a longer period of time, or repeatedly may cause the sugar solution to darken and will decrease the performance
of the medium. Note that SD Minimal Base from Clontech already contains a carbon source.
• If you purchase galactose separately, it must be highly purified and contain <0.01% glucose.
• [Optional] For 3-AT-containing medium, add the appropriate amount of 1 M 3-AT stock
solution and swirl to mix well. The concentration of 3-AT used in the medium depends on
the yeast strain and, to some extent, on the presence of transforming plasmid(s). See your
system-specific User Manual for further information.
Notes:
• 3-AT is heat-labile and will be destroyed if added to medium hotter than 55°C.
• 3-AT, a competitive inhibitor of the yeast HIS3 protein (His3p), is used to inhibit low levels of His3p expressed in
a leaky manner in some reporter strains (Fields, 1993; Durfee et al., 1993).
Example: To make one liter of 10X –Leu/–Trp DO Solution, combine the following:
• 200 mg adenine hemisulfate
• 200 mg arginine HCl
• 200 mg histidine HCl monohydrate
• 300 mg isoleucine
• 300 mg lysine HCl
• 200 mg methionine
• 500 mg phenylalanine
• 2000 mg threonine
• 300 mg tyrosine
• 200 mg uracil
• 1500 mg valine
1 L Dissolve components in 1 L deionized H2O. Autoclave.
B. E. coli MEDIA
• Hanahan’s SOC Medium
Final concentration To Prepare One Liter
Bactotryptone 2% 20 g
Yeast extract 0.5% 5 g
NaCl 10 mM 10 ml of 1 M NaCl
KCl 2.5 mM 2.5 ml of 1 M KCl
MgCl2* 10 mM 10 ml of 1 M MgCl2• 6 H2O
MgSO4* 10 mM 10 ml of 1 M MgSO4 • 7H2O
Glucose* 20 mM 20 ml of 1 M glucose
Deionized H2O to 1 L
* Before adding MgCl2, MgSO4, and glucose stock solutions, separately filter sterilize them using a 0.2-µm filter.
Add the bactotryptone, yeast extract, and NaCl to 900 ml of deionized H2O; stir or shake until
solutes have dissolved. Add the KCl. Adjust the pH to 7 with 5 N NaOH (~0.2 ml). Adjust the
volume to 960 ml with deionized H2O and autoclave. Just before use, add filter-sterilized
MgCl2, MgSO4, and glucose.
• LB broth
Bacto-tryptone 10 g/L
Bacto-yeast extract 5 g/L
NaCl 5 g/L
Adjust pH to 7.0 with 5 N NaOH. Autoclave. Store broth at 22°C.
• LB/amp agar plates
Prepare LB broth (Sambrook et al., 1989) as above. Add agar (18 g/L), autoclave, and cool
to 50°C. Add ampicillin to 50 µg/ml. Pour plates and store at 4°C.
• M9 minimal medium for nutritional selection of E. coli transformants complemented by
the wild- type yeast gene. For optimal recovery of KC8 and HB101 transformants, add a 1X
mixture of amino acids (i.e., dropout [DO] supplement) lacking the specific nutrient that
will allow selection of the desired plasmid. (The same DO supplements used for yeast SD
medium can be used to supplement M9 minimal medium; see Appendix C.A for dropout
recipe or purchase premixed DO Supplements from Clontech.) In addition, KC8 requires
thiamine, and HB101 requires thiamine and proline, for growth on minimal medium.
Prepare 900 ml of M9 medium as directed in Sambrook et al. (1989). To prepare agar plates,
add agar (20 g/L) prior to autoclaving. After autoclaving, allow medium to cool to 55°C.
Then add the following:
• 1 ml of 50 mg/ml ampicillin stock
• 1 ml of 1.0 M thiamine-HCl stock
• 100 ml of an appropriate sterile 10X DO stock solution
In addition, for HB101 cells only:
• 4 ml of a 10 mg/ml stock of proline
• Stock solutions for use with M9 or LB media
Ampicillin (50 mg/ml in H2O). Store at 4°C no longer than 1 month.
Thiamine-HCl (1 M, filter-sterilized)
Proline (10 mg/ml, filter sterilized)
10X DO stock solution (Appendix C.A)
• Z buffer
Na2HPO4 • 7H2O 16.1 g/L
NaH2PO4 • H2O 5.50 g/L
KCl 0.75 g/L
MgSO4 • 7H2O 0.246 g/L
Adjust to pH 7.0 and autoclave. Can be stored at room temperature for up to 1 year.
• X-gal stock solution
Dissolve 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-galactopyranoside (X-GAL; Cat No. 8060-1) in
N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) at a concentration of 20 mg/ml. Store in the dark at
–20°C.
• Z buffer/X-gal solution
100 ml Z buffer
0.27 ml β-mercaptoethanol (β-ME; Sigma Cat No. M-6250)
1.67 ml X-gal stock solution
pACT MM Libraries GAL4(768–881) AD, –Leu 7.65 EcoR I not available Durfee et al., 1993;
LEU2, ampr, HA epitope tag (3.0, 3.05, 1.6) Elledge, pers. comm.
pAS2-1c GAL4 2H-2 GAL4(1–147) DNA-BD, –Trp 8.4 Hind III U30497 Harper et al., 1993
TRP1, ampr, CYHs2 (4.6, 2.2, 0.9, 0.7)
pB42AD LexA 2H acidic activator B42, –Trp 6.45 Hind III U89961 Gyuris et al., 1993
TRP1, ampr, HA epitope tag (3.4, 2.1, 0.6, 0.35) (pJG4-5)
pGAD10 MM Libraries GAL4(768–881) AD, –Leu 6.6 Hind III U13188 Bartel et al., 1993a
LEU2, ampr (5.9, 0.7)d
APPENDIX E. Plasmid Information
pGAD424 GAL4 2H GAL4(768–881) AD, –Leu 6.6 Hind III U07647 Bartel et al., 1993a
LEU2, ampr (5.9, 0.7)d
pGAD GH MM Libraries GAL4(768–881) AD, –Leu 7.9 Hind III in submission van Aelst et al., 1993
LEU2, ampr (7.1, 0.5, 0.3)
60
pGAD GL MM Libraries GAL4(768–881) AD, –Leu 6.9 Hind III not available van Aelst et al., 1993
LEU2, ampr (6.1, 0.5, 0.3)
pGADT7 GAL4 2H-3 GAL4(768–881) AD, –Leu 8.0 Hind III in submission Clontech
www.clontech.com
LEU2, ampr, HA epitope tag (7.1, 0.8)
pGBKT7 GAL4 2H-3 GAL4(1–147) DNA-BD, –Trp 7.3 Hind III in submission Clontech
TRP1, kanr, c-Myc epitope tag (4.9, 1.5, 0.9) Louret et al., 1997
pGBT9 GAL4 2H GAL4(1–147) DNA-BD, –Trp 5.5 Hind III U07646 Bartel et al., 1993a
TRP1, ampr (4.6, 0.9)
pGilda LexA 2H LexA(1–202), DNA-BD, –His 6.6 Hind III in submission Golemis et al., 1996
HIS3, ampr (0.2, 6.3) Gimeno et al., 1996
pLexA LexA 2H LexA(1–202), DNA-BD, –His 10.2 Hind III U89960 Gyuris et al., 1993
HIS3, ampr (5.2, 4.8, 0.2) (pEG202)
pBridge GAL4 2H, GAL4(1–147) DNA-BD, –Trp 6.5 Hind III in submission Tirode et al., 1997
GAL4 2H-2, -3 TRP1, ampr (5.6, 0.9)
a
Key to system abbreviations: GAL4 2H-2 = Matchmaker Two-Hybrid System 2 (Cat No. K1604-1); LexA 2H = Matchmaker LexA Two-Hybrid System (Cat No. K1609-1); GAL4 2H =
Matchmaker Two-Hybrid System (Cat No. K1605-1); GAL4 2H-3 = Matchmaker Two Hybrid System 3 (Cat No. 630303). MM 1H = Matchmaker One-Hybrid System (Cat No. K1603-1).
Some plasmids are also available separately.
b
Additional vector information, restriction maps, and multiple cloning site (MCS) sequences are provided in the Matchmaker GAL4 Two-Hybrid System Vectors Handbook, the
LexA Two-Hybrid System User Manual, and Vector Information Packets (provided with regular and Pretransformed Matchmaker Libraries).
c
www.clontech.com
pLexA-Lam LexA 2H Human lamin C(66–230) –His 10.6 Hind III Bartel et al., 1993a
in pLexA, HIS3, ampr (5.2, 4.3, 0.9, 0.2)
pLexA-Pos LexA 2H LexA/GAL4 fusion gene, –His ~13.5 Hind III Golemis et al., 1994
HIS3, ampr (6.0, 4.5, 3.0) (pSH17-4)
pTD1 GAL4 2H SV40 large T-antigen (84–708) –Leu ~15.0 Hind III Li & Fields, 1993;
in pGAD3F, LEU2, ampr (12, 1.3, 1.2, 0.5) Chien et al., 1991
pTD1-1 GAL4 2H-2 SV40 large T-antigen (84–708) –Leu ~10.0 Hind III Li & Fields, 1993;
in pACT2, LEU2, ampr (7.3, 1.2, 1.0, 0.5)
pVA3 GAL4 2H murine p53 (72–390) in pGBT9 –Trp 6.4 Hind III Iwabuchi et al., 1993
TRP1, ampr (4.6, 1.8)
pVA3-1 GAL4 2H-2 murine p53 (72–390) in pAS2-1 –Trp 9.4 Hind III Iwabuchi et al., 1993
TRP1, ampr (4.6, 2.2, 1.7, 0.9) Chien et al., 1991
a
pB42AD-T, pLAM5’, pLAM5’-1, pLexA-53, pLexA-Lam, pTD1-1, and pVA3-1 are derivatives of the plasmids described in the indicated references; plasmids were modified at
Clontech.
61
Clontech Laboratories, Inc.
Yeast Protocols Handbook
table viii. Matchmaker one-hybrid system cloning, reporter & control plasmids
Diagnostic
Selection on Size R.E. Sites
Vectora Descriptionb SD Medium (kb) (kb) Reference
p53HIS HIS3 under control of –Ura, –His 6.7 EcoR I/Xho Ic Luo et al., 1996
p53 binding sites in pHISi, (5.7, 1.0)
HIS3, URA3, ampr
62
cloned target element, (6.4, 0.04)f
APPENDIX E: Plasmid Information continued
URA3, ampr
a
www.clontech.com
In the one-hybrid system, a putative recognition sequence (the target DNA sequence) must be cloned into the MCS of one of the reporter plasmids. The construct is then used to
generate the necessary yeast reporter strain for detecting specific DNA-protein interactions.
b
Additional vector information, restriction maps, and multiple cloning site (MCS) sequences are provided in the Matchmaker One-Hybrid System User Manual.
c
p53HIS and p53Blue are not cut by Sma I, which makes it possible to distinguish them from pHISi and pLacZi, each of which have a single Sma I site.
d
pGAD53m is not cut by Xho I.
e
Leaky HIS3 expression in these plasmids permits its use as a selectable marker on SD/–His (without 3-AT).
f
In addition, pHISi and pLacZi have a single Sma I site, which makes it possible to distinguish them from p53HIS and p53Blue, which are not cut by Sma I.
table ix. yeast reporter strains in the Matchmaker one-and two-hybrid systems
Transformation
Strain System Genotypea Reporter(s)b Markersc References
SFY526 GAL4 2H MATa, ura3-52, his3-200, ade2-101, lys2-801, lacZ trp1, leu2 Harper et al., 1993
trp 1-901, leu2-3, 112, canr, gal4-542, gal80-538,
www.clontech.com
URA3 : : GAL1UAS-GAL1TATA-lacZ
EGY48 LexA 2H MATα, ura3, his3, trp1, LexAop (x6)-LEU2 LEU2 his3, trp1, ura3 Estojak et al., 1995
YM4271 LexA 2H & MATa, ura3-52, his3-200, lys2-801, ade2-101, ade5, his3, trp1 Liu et al., 1993
MM 1H trp1-901, leu2-3, 112, tyr1-501,gal4Δ, gal80Δ, ade5 : : hisG
PJ69-2Af PT Libraries MATa, trp1-901, leu2-3, 112, ura3-52, his3-200, HIS3, ADE2, MEL1 trp1, ura3, leu2 James et al., 1996
gal4Δ, gal80Δ, LYS2 : : GAL1UAS-GAL1TATA-HIS3,
GAL2UAS-GAL2TATA-ADE2, MEL1
AH109f GAL4 2H-3 MATa, trp1-901, leu2-3, 112, ura3-52, his3-200, HIS3, ADE2, lacZ, trp1, leu2 James et al., 1996;
gal4Δ, gal80Δ, LYS2 : : GAL1UAS-GAL1TATA-HIS3, MEL1 MEL1 Holtz, Unpublished
GAL2UAS-GAL2TATA-ADE2, URA3::MEL1UAS-MEL1TATA-lacZ
a
The trp1, his3, gal4, and gal80 mutations are all deletions; leu2–3, 112 is a double mutation. The LYS2 gene is nonfunctional in the HF7c and CG-1945. See Chapter II for more
information on the promoters of the reporter genes.
b
See Table V for more information on reporter genes and their phenotypes.
c
Genes that are used as selection markers in this system.
d
PT Libraries = Pretransformed Matchmaker Libraries.
e
CG-1945 is a derivative of HF7c (Feilotter et al., 1994).
f
The ade2–101 gene of the precursor strain was replaced (by recombination) with the GAL2-ADE2 reporter construct.
63
Clontech Laboratories, Inc.
Yeast Protocols Handbook
Yeast Protocols Handbook
Notes
AmpliTaq® and GeneAmp® are registered trademarks of Hoffmann-LaRoche, Inc., and F. Hoffmann LaRoche, Ltd.
FalconTM is a trademark of Becton Dickinson & Co.
Galacton-StarTM and Sapphire IITM are trademarks of Tropix, Inc.
GenBankTM is a trademark of the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services.
Parafilm® is a registered trademark of the American Can Co.