Chapter-3 SP Caliper
Chapter-3 SP Caliper
Cl-
Na+
+
Cl
Na
shale
Cl-
Na+
Cl-
Na+
Chapter-3
SP Log Self Potential
+
By
Chap-3
Educational Outcomes
9/21/2011
Chap-3
9/21/2011
Chap-3
by Lecturer
SCHEMATIC
REPRESENTATION of
POTENTIAL &
CURRENT
DISTRIBUTION
in and around a
permeable bed
ln
C mf
F vu
RT v u
Rmf
ln
F vu
Rw
at 77F (25C):
Cw
Cw
E D K D log
11.6 log
C mf
C mf
C w RT
Rmf
RT
EM
ln
ln
F
C
F
R
mf
w
at 77F (25C):
Cw
Cw
E M K M log
59.1 log
C mf
C mf
Static SP
9/21/2011
SSP E D E M K SP
Chap-3
T - absolute Temperature
F
Cw
Cmf
Rw
Rmf
u
v
- Faraday constant
- formation water concentration
- mud filtrate concentration
- formation water resistivity
- mud filtrate resistivity
- mobility of Cl (67.6 10-5 cm/sV)
- mobility of Na (45.6 10-5 cm/sV)
Cw
log
C mf
Cw
71 log
C mf
sandstone
-160
Cl-
Cl-
9/21/2011
Diffusion-
potential
shale Na+
ClCl-
+ 40
Na+
Na+
- SP in mV +
Na+
Membranepotential
+
Chap-3
Example
Step 1:
draw shale base line
Step 2:
draw sand base line
Step 3:
select reservoirs,
describe the profile
9/21/2011
Chap-3
10
TWO
EXAMPLES OF
SP
BASE-LINE
SHIFT
SP (Main Observations)
SP results from conductivity differences between formation
water and mud salinity.
9/21/2011
Chap-3
12
Ratio of Rmf/Rw
Thickness (h) and true resistivity (Rt) of the bed
Rxo and diameter of the invaded zone (di)
Resistivity of the adjacent formation
Resistivity of the mud (Rm) and borehole diameter
Chap-3
15
EFFECT OF SHALINESS ON SP
EFFECT OF
PERMEABLE
BED THICKNESS
ON RECORDED
SP
EFFECT OF
VARYING SHALE
THICKNESS ON
SP
EFFECT OF
INVASION
ON SP
when
Ri = Rt
SP IN RESISTIVE FORMATIONS
Quality Control SP
Should be recorded noise-free as possible
Repeatability: curves should have the same shape and
character as those from previous runs or repeated sections if
same conditions with respect to mud and no streaming potential.
Cross-check the curve character with other logs from the same
logging run.
9/21/2011
Chap-3
23
DETERMINATION OF Rw
FROM SP
R mfe
K SP log
Rwe
Clean formation
Thick formation
Salinity contrast
Determination of Rweq
INPUT:
SSP = 100 mV @ 250 F
Rmf = 0.7 .m @ 100 F
From Chart Gen-9:
Rmf= 0.33 .m @ 250 F
If Rmf @ 75 F > 0.1 , then Rmfeq = 0.85 Rmf
If Rmf @ 75 F < 0.1 , then use Chart SP-2
Output:
Rmfeq = 0.85 * Rmf
Rmfeq @ 250 F = 0.85 * 0.33 = 0.28 . m
R mfeq
SSP K SP log
R
weq
9/21/2011
Chap-3
26
9/21/2011
Chap-3
27
9/21/2011
Chap-3
28
9/21/2011
Chap-3
29
CALIPER LOGS
9/21/2011
Chap-3
30
Caliper Logs
Caliper Measurements
2-Arm Calipers
3-Arm Calipers
4-Arm Calipers
6-Arm Calipers
Why ?
Chap-3
by Lecturer
31
Caliper Log
Chap-3
32
Caliper Measurements
Single axis
Three arm
9/21/2011
Chap-3
33
9/21/2011
Chap-3
34
Geomechanical Information
(Relationship between stress fields and
borehole Shape)
Fig 3a
9/21/2011
Fig 3b
Chap-3
35
9/21/2011
Chap-3
36
9/21/2011
Chap-3
37