CH 06 - Analyzing Operating Activities
CH 06 - Analyzing Operating Activities
Chapter 6
Analyzing Operating Activities
REVIEW
Income is the residual of revenues and gains less expenses and losses. Net income is
measured using the accrual basis of accounting. Accrual accounting recognizes
revenues and gains when earned, and recognizes expenses and losses when incurred.
The income statement (also referred to as statement of operations or earnings) reports
net income during a period of time. This statement also reports income components-revenues, expenses, gains, and losses. We analyze income and its components to
evaluate company performance, assess risk exposures, and predict amounts, timing,
and uncertainty of future cash flows. While "bottom line" net income frames our
analysis, income components provide pieces of a mosaic revealing the economic portrait
of a company. This chapter examines the analysis and interpretation of income
components. We consider current reporting requirements and their implications for our
analysis of income components. We describe how we might usefully apply analytical
adjustments to income components and related disclosures to better our analysis. We
direct special attention to revenue recognition and the recording of major expenses and
costs. Further use and analysis is made of income components in Part Three of the
book.
6-1
OUTLINE
Income Measurement
Concept of Income
Measuring Accounting Income
Alternative Classification and Income Measures
Non-recurring items
Extraordinary Items
Discontinued Operations
Accounting Changes
Special Items
Deferred Charges
Research and Development
Computer Software Expenses
Exploration and Development Costs in Extractive Industries
Supplementary Employee Benefits
Employee Stock Options
Interest Costs
Income Taxes
6-2
ANALYSIS OBJECTIVES
Explain the concepts of income measurement and their implications for analysis of
operating activities.
Analyze revenue and expense recognition and its risks for financial analysis.
Describe and interpret interest costs and the accounting for income taxes.
6-3
QUESTIONS
1. The income statement portrays the net results of operations of an enterprise. Since
results are what enterprises are established to achieve and since their value is, in
large measure, determined by the size and quality of these results, it follows that the
analyst attaches great importance to the income statement.
2. Income summarizes in financial terms the operating activities of a company. Income
is the amount of revenues and gains for the period in excess of expenses and losses,
all computed under accrual accounting. Income provides a measure of the change in
shareholder wealth for a period and an indication of a companys future earning
power. Accounting income differs from cash flows because certain revenues and
gains are recognized in periods before or after cash is received and certain expenses
and losses are recognized in periods before or after cash is paid.
3. Economic income is net cash flows plus the change in the present value of future
cash flows. Another similar concept, the Hicksian concept of income, considers
income for the period to be the amount that can be withdrawn from the company in a
period without changing the net wealth of the company. Hicksian income equals cash
flow plus the change in the fair value of net assets.
4. Accounting income is the excess of revenues and gains over expenses and losses
measured using accrual accounting. As such, revenues (and gains) are recognized
when earned and expenses (losses) are matched against the revenues (and gains).
5. Net income is the excess of the revenues and gains of the company over the
expenses and losses of the company. Net income often is called the bottom line,
although that is a misnomer because certain unrealized holding gains and losses are
charged directly to equity and bypass net income. Comprehensive income includes
all changes in equity that result from non-owner transactions (excluding items such
as dividends and stock issuances). Items creating differences between net income
and comprehensive income include unrealized gains and losses on available for sale
securities, foreign currency translation adjustments, minimum pension liability
adjustments, and unrealized holding gains or losses on derivative instruments.
Comprehensive income is the ultimate bottom line income number. Continuing
income is a measure of net income earned by ongoing segments of the company.
Continuing income differs from net income because continuing income excludes the
income or loss of segments of the company that are to be discontinued or sold (it
also excludes extraordinary items and effects from changes in accounting
principles).
6. Details regarding comprehensive income are reported by the vast majority of
companies in the statement of stockholders equity rather than the income statement.
7. Core income is a measure of income that excludes all non-recurring items that are
reported as separate items on the income statement.
6-4
6-5
13. Distortions in revenues (gains) and expenses (losses) can arise from several
accounting sources. These include choices in the timing of transactions (such as
revenue recognition and expense matching), selections from the variety of generally
accepted principles and methods available, the introduction of conservative or
aggressive estimates and assumptions, and choices in how revenues, gains,
expenses, and losses are classified and presented in financial statements. Generally,
a company wishing to increase current income at the expense of future income will
engage in one or more of the following practices:
(a) It will choose inventory methods that allow for maximum inventory carrying values
and minimum current charges to cost of goods or services sold.
(b) It will choose depreciation methods and useful lives of property that will result in
minimum current charges as depreciation expense.
(c) It will defer all managed costs to the future such as, for example: pre-operating,
moving, rearrangement and start-up costs, and marketing costs. Such costs
would be carried as deferred charges or included with the costs of other assets
such as property, plant, and equipment.
(d) It will amortize assets and defer costs over the largest possible period. Such
assets include goodwill, leasehold improvements, patents, and copyrights.
(e) It will elect the method requiring the lowest possible pension and other
employment compensation cost accruals.
(f) It will inventory rather than expense administrative costs, taxes, and similar items.
(g) It will choose the most accelerated methods of income recognition such as in the
areas of leasing, franchising, real estate sales, and contracting.
(h) It immediately will recognize as revenue, rather than defer the taking up of
benefits, items such as investment tax credits.
(i) Companies that wish to manage the size of accounting income can regulate the
flow of income and expense by means of reserves for future costs and losses.
14. (1) Depreciation
a. Straight Line: This is calculated by taking the salvage value (S) from the
original cost (C) and dividing by the useful life of the asset in question; that is,
(C-S)/(Useful life). Sum-of-Years'-Digits: This depreciation formula is: (C-S) x
(X/Y); where C and S are the same as above, X is the remaining years (that is, if
item is being depreciated over 5 years and this is the first year, then X=5), and
Y equals the "sum-of-years'-digits" (that is, for a 5-year asset,
Y=5+4+3+2+1=15).
b. Straight line is easily understood and provides level depreciation and earnings
effects. The sum-of-the-years'-digits gives heavier weight to earlier years and
causes higher depreciation and lower earnings in the early years and lower
depreciation and higher earnings toward the end of the asset's life.
(2) Inventory
a. LIFO (last-in, first-out) method: The LIFO method assumes the inventory
employed are those most recently acquired. FIFO (first-in, first-out) method:
The FIFO method assumes the first inventory items acquired are used first.
b. The effect on earnings depends on whether the economy is in an inflationary
or deflationary period. In times of inflation (the more usual case), LIFO
inventory accounting would result in lower earnings being reported than would
be the case had FIFO been employed.
6-6
c.
(3) Installment sales
a. Accrual method: Assumes income is recognized when the sale is made
(earned). Installment method: Assumes income is recognized only when cash
is received as the various installments come in.
b. The installment method is commonly used for tax purposes while the accrual
method is employed in financial statements. The accrual method would result
in a higher earnings figure being reported than the installment method.
15. Three different types of accounting changes include:
(a) Changes in accounting principle
(b) Changes in accounting estimate
(c) Changes in reporting entity
16. Special items refer to transactions and events that are unusual or infrequent, not
both. These items are reported as separate line items on the income statement before
continuing income. Examples of special items include restructuring charges,
impairments of long-lived assets, and asset write-offs.
17. Special (one-time) charges usually receive less attention by investors because it
often is believed that such charges will not recur in the future. As a result, companies
often include as much operating expense and loss as possible in special charges
hoping that investors will focus on income before special charges that excludes
these expenses and losses. If investors do focus on income before these charges,
company value may be erroneously perceived to be higher than is supported by the
fundamentals.
18. Many special charges should be viewed as operating expenses that need to be
reflected in permanent income. Essentially, many special charges are either
corrections of understated past expenses or investments for improved future
profitability. As such, analysts should adjust their income measurements to include
special charges in operating income.
19. The following criteria exemplify the rules that have been established to prevent the
premature anticipation of revenue. Realization is deemed to take place only after the
following conditions have been met:
(a) The earning activities undertaken to create revenue are substantially complete;
for example, no significant effort is necessary to complete the transaction.
(b) In the case of a sale, the risk of ownership has effectively passed to the buyer.
(c) The revenue, as well as the associated expenses, can be measured or estimated
with substantial accuracy.
(d) The revenue recognized should normally result in an increase in cash,
receivables, or marketable securities and, under certain conditions, in an increase
in inventories or other assets, or a decrease in a liability.
(e) The business transactions giving rise to the income should be at arm's-length with
independent parties (that is, not with controlled parties).
(f) The transactions should not be subject to revocation, for example, carrying the
right of return of merchandise sold.
20. SFAS 48 ("Revenue Recognition When Right of Return Exists") specifies that revenue
from sales transactions in which the buyer has a right to return the product should be
recognized at the time of sale only if all of the following conditions are met:
At the date of sale, the price is substantially fixed or determinable.
6-7
The buyer has paid the seller, or is obligated to pay the seller (not contingent on
resale of the product).
In the event of theft or physical damage to the product, the buyer's obligation to
the seller would not be changed.
The buyer acquiring the product for resale has economic substance apart from
that provided by the seller.
The seller does not have significant obligations for future performance to directly
bring about resale of the product.
Product returns can be reasonably estimated.
If these conditions are not met, revenue recognition is postponed; if they are met,
sales revenue and cost of sales should be reduced to reflect estimated returns and
expected costs or losses should be accrued. Note: The Statement does not apply to
accounting for revenue in (a) service industries if part or all of the service revenue
may be returned under cancellation privileges granted to the buyer, (b) transactions
involving real estate or leases, or (c) sales transactions in which a customer may
return defective goods such as under warranty provisions.
21. Some of the factors that might impair the ability to predict returns (when right of
return exists in transactions) are: (1) susceptibility to significant external factors,
such as technological obsolescence or swings in market demand, (2) long return
privilege periods, and (3) absence of appropriate historical return experience.
22. SFAS 49 ("Accounting for Product Financing Arrangements") is concerned with the
issue of whether revenue has been earned. A product financing arrangement is an
agreement involving the transfer or sponsored acquisition of inventory that, although
it resembles a sale, is in substance a means of financing inventory through a second
party. For example, if a company transfers inventory to another company in an
apparent sale, and in a related transaction agrees to repurchase the inventory at a
later date, the arrangement may be a product financing arrangement rather than a
sale and subsequent purchase of inventory. If the party bearing the risks and
rewards of ownership transfers inventory to a purchaser, and in a related transaction
agrees to repurchase the product at a specified
price, or guarantees some specified resale price for sales of the product to outside
parties, the arrangement is a product financing arrangement and should be
accounted for as such.
23. The percentage-of-completion method is preferred when estimates of costs to
complete along with estimates of progress toward completion of the contract can be
made with reasonable dependability. A common basis of profit estimation is to record
that part of the estimated total profit that corresponds to the ratio that costs incurred
to date bears to expected total costs. Other methods of estimation of completion can
be based on units completed or on qualified engineering estimates or on units
delivered.
The completed-contract method of accounting is preferable where the conditions
inherent in the contract present risks and uncertainties that result in an inability to
make reasonable estimates of costs and completion time. Problems under this
method concern the point at which completion of the contract is deemed to have
occurred as well as the kind of expenses to be deferred. For example, some
companies defer all costs to the completion date, including general and
administrative overhead while others consider such costs as period costs to be
expensed as they are incurred.
6-8
6-9
24. The recording of revenue is the first step in the process of income determination and
is a step for which the recognition of any and all revenue depends. The analyst
should be particularly inquisitive about revenue recognition policies and procedures.
Some specific aspects include the following: (1) One element that casts doubt on the
validity of revenue is uncertainty about the ability of the seller to collect the resulting
receivable. Special collection problems exist with respect to installment sales, real
estate sales, and franchise sales. Problems of collection exist, however, in the case of
all sales and the analyst must be alert to them. (2) The analyst must also be alert to
the problems related to the timing of revenue recognition. The present rules generally
do not allow for recognition of profit in advance of salesuch as with increases in
market value of property such as land or equipment, the accretion of values in
growing timber, or the increase in the value of inventories are not recognized in the
accounts. As a consequence, income will not be recorded before sale and the timing
of sales is a matter that lies within the discretion of management. That, in turn, gives
management a certain degree of discretion in the timing of profit recognition. (3) In
the area of contract accounting, the analyst should recognize that the use of the
completed contract method is justified only in cases where reasonable estimates of
costs and the degree of completion are not possible. Yet, some companies consider
the choice of method a matter of discretion. (4) Other alternative methods of taking
up revenue, as in the case of lessors or finance companies, must be fully understood
by the analyst before an evaluation of a company's earnings or a comparison among
companies in the same industry is undertaken.
25. SFAS 2 ("Accounting for Research and Development Costs") offers a simple solution
to the complex problem of accounting for research and development costs. Namely,
it requires that R&D costs be charged to expense when incurred. It defines research
and development activities as follows:
(a) Research activities are aimed at discovery of new knowledge for the development
of a new product or process or in bringing about a significant improvement to an
existing product or process.
(b) Development activities translate the research findings into a plan or design for a
new product or process or a significant improvement to an existing product or
process.
R&D specifically excludes routine or periodic alterations to ongoing operations and
market research and testing activities.
The Board recommended the following accounting treatment for R&D costs:
(a) The majority of expenditures incurred in research and development activities as
defined above constitutes the costs of that activity and should be charged to
expense when incurred.
(b) Costs of materials, equipment, and facilities that have alternative future uses (in
research and development projects or otherwise) should be capitalized as
tangible assets.
(c) Intangibles purchased from an external party for R&D use that have alternative
future uses should also be capitalized.
(d) Indirect costs involved in acquiring patents should be capitalized as well.
6-10
6-11
28.
Goodwill is measured by the excess of cost over the fair market value of tangible net
assets acquired in a transaction accounted for as a purchase. That is the theory of it.
The financial analyst must be alert to the makeup and the method of valuation of the
Goodwill account as well as to the method of its ultimate disposition. One way of
disposing of the Goodwill account, frequently chosen by management, is to write it
off at a time when it would have the least serious impact on the market's judgment of
the company's earnings, for example, at a time of loss or reduced earnings. Under
normal circumstances, goodwill is not indestructible but is rather an asset with a
limited useful life. Still, whatever the advantages of location, market dominance and
competitive stance, sales skill, product acceptance, or other benefits are, they cannot
be unaffected by the passing of time and by changes in the business environment.
Thus, the analyst must assess the carrying amount of goodwill by reference to such
evidence of continuing value as the profitability of units for which the goodwill
consideration was originally paid.
29. The interest cost to a company is the nominal rate paid including, in the case of
bonds, the amortization of any bond discount or premium. A complication arises
when companies issue convertible debt or debt with warrants, thus achieving a
nominal debt coupon cost that is below the cost of similar debt not carrying these
features. After trial pronouncements on the subject and much controversy, APB 14
concluded in the case of convertible debt that the inseparability of the debt and
equity features is such that no portion of the proceeds from the issuance should be
accounted for as attributable to the conversion feature. In the case of debt issued
with stock warrants attached, the proceeds of the debt attributable to the warrants
should be accounted for as paid-in capital. The corresponding charge is to a debt
discount account that must be amortized over the life of the debt issue thus
increasing the effective interest cost.
30. a. SFAS 34 ("Capitalization of Interest Cost") requires capitalization of interest cost
as part of the historical cost of "assets that are constructed or otherwise
produced for an enterprise's own use (including assets constructed or produced
for the enterprise by others for which deposits or progress payments have been
made)." Inventory items that are routinely manufactured or produced in large
quantities on a repetitive basis do not qualify for interest capitalization. The
objectives of interest capitalization, according to the FASB, are (1) to measure
more accurately the acquisition cost of an asset, and (2) to amortize that
acquisition cost against revenues generated by the asset.
b. The amount of interest to be capitalized is based on the entity's actual borrowings
and interest payments. The rate to be used for capitalization may be ascertained
in this order: (1) the rate of specific borrowings associated with the assets and (2)
if borrowings are not specific for the asset, or the asset exceeds specific
borrowings therefore, a weighted average of rates applicable to other appropriate
borrowings may
be used. Alternatively, a company may use a weighted average of rates of all
appropriate borrowings regardless of specific borrowings incurred to finance the
asset.
6-12
c. Interest capitalization is not permitted to exceed total interest costs for any period,
nor is imputing interest cost to equity funds permitted. A company without debt
will have no interest to capitalize. The capitalization period begins when three
conditions are present: (1) expenditures for the asset have been made by the
entity, (2) work on the asset is in progress, and (3) interest cost is being incurred.
Interest capitalization ceases when the asset is ready for its intended use.
31. The intrinsic value of an option is the amount by which the market value of the
underlying security exceeds the option exercise price at the time of measurement.
The fair value of an option is the amount that market participants would be willing to
pay today to purchase the option.
32. The fair value of an option is affected by the exercise price, the current market price,
the risk-free rate of interest, the expected life of the option, the expected volatility of
the stock price, and the expected dividend yield.
33. SFAS 123 requires that the company amortize the fair value of employee stock
options (estimated using various option pricing models) at the grant date over the
expected life of the option. The cumulative amortization of all employee stock
options granted in the past is collectively called the option compensation expense.
Until recently, option compensation expense was not charged to income. However, a
recent revision of the standard, SFAS 123R, requires that the option compensation
expense be charged to income. Compensation expense may be included in various
expense categories such as cost of goods sold, SG&A, R&D etc. based on which area
of the company the respective employee works for.
34. The economic cost of issuing options at the prevailing market price are: (1) the
interest cost, which is that the employee is able to pay for the stock purchase many
years later using the current stock price; and (2) cost of providing an option to
exercise, which arises because the employee can share in the potential upside but is
protected from sharing in the potential downside risk.
35. Option overhang refers to the intrinsic value of outstanding options (both exercisable
and otherwise) as a proportion of the companys market value. It is a measure of the
value of potential dilution that arises from option grants to employees. It measured by
aggregating the intrinsic value of all outstanding employee stock options, using the
current stock price, and dividing it by the current market capitalization of the
companys equity.
35. The net income computed on the basis of generally accepted accounting principles
(also known as "book income") is usually not identical to the "taxable income"
computed on the entity's tax return. This is due to two types of difference. Permanent
differences (discussed here) and temporary, or timing, differences. Permanent
differences result from provisions of the tax law under which:
(a) Certain items may be nontaxablefor example, income on tax exempt obligations
and proceeds of life insurance on an officer
6-13
(b)
(c) Certain deductions are not allowedfor example, penalties for filing certain
returns, government fines, and officer life insurance premiums.
(d) Special deductions granted by lawfor example, dividend exclusion on dividends
from unconsolidated subsidiaries and from dividends received from other
domestic corporations.
36. The effective tax rate paid by a corporation on its income will vary from the statutory
rate because:
The basis of carrying property for accounting purposes may differ from that for
tax purposes from reorganizations, business combinations, or other transactions.
Nonqualified and qualified stock-option plans may result in book-tax differences.
Certain industries, such as savings and loan associations, shipping lines, and
insurance companies enjoy special tax privileges.
Up to $100,000 of corporate income is taxed at lower tax rates.
Certain credits may apply, such as R&D credits and foreign tax credits.
State and local income taxes, net of federal tax benefit, are included in total tax
expenses.
What makes these differences and factors permanent is the fact that they do not have
any future repercussions on a company's taxable income. Thus, they must be taken
into account when reconciling a company's actual (effective) tax rate to the statutory
rate.
37. SFAS 109 ("Accounting for Income Taxes") establishes financial accounting and
reporting standards for the effects of income taxes that result from an enterprise's
activities during the current and preceding years, and requires an asset and liability
approach. SFAS 109 requires that deferred taxes should be determined separately
for each tax-paying component (an individual entity or group of entities that is
consolidated for tax purposes) in each tax jurisdiction. The determination includes
the following procedures:
Identify the types and amounts of existing temporary differences and the nature
and amount of each type of operating loss and tax credit carry forward, plus the
remaining length of the carry forward period.
Measure the total deferred tax liability for taxable temporary differences, using the
applicable tax rate.
Measure the total deferred tax asset for deductible temporary differences and
operating loss carry forwards, using the applicable tax rate.
Measure deferred tax assets for each type of tax credit carry forward.
Reduce deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance if based on the weight of
available evidence. It is more likely than not (a likelihood of more than 50 percent)
that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The
valuation allowance should be sufficient to reduce the deferred tax asset to the
amount that is more likely than not to be realized.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities should be adjusted for the effect of a change in tax
laws or rates. The effect should be included in income from continuing operations for
the period that includes the enactment date.
6-14
38. (a) Revenues or gains are included in taxable income later than they are included in
pretax accounting income.
(b) Expenses or losses are deducted in determining taxable income later than they
are deducted in determining pretax accounting income.
(c) Revenues or gains are included in taxable income earlier than they are included in
pretax accounting income.
(d) Expenses or losses are deducted in determining taxable income earlier than they
are deducted in determining pretax accounting income.
39. The components of the net deferred tax liability or net deferred tax asset recognized
in a company's balance sheet should be disclosed. These include the:
Total of all deferred tax liabilities.
Total of all deferred tax assets.
Total valuation allowance recognized for deferred tax assets.
Additional disclosures include the significant components of income tax expense
attributable to continuing operations for each year presented which include, for
example:
Current tax expense or benefit.
Deferred tax expense or benefit (exclusive of the effects of other components).
Investment tax credits.
Government grants (to the extent recognized as a reduction of income tax
expense).
The benefits of operating loss carry forwards.
Tax expense that results from allocating certain tax benefits either directly to
contributed capital or to reduce goodwill or other noncurrent intangible assets of
an acquired entity.
Adjustments of a deferred tax liability or asset for enacted changes in tax laws or
rates or a change in the tax status of the enterprise.
Adjustments of the beginning-of-year balance of a valuation allowance because of
a change in circumstances that causes a change in judgment about the
realizability of the related deferred tax asset in future years.
Also to be disclosed is a reconciliation between the effective income tax rate and the
statutory federal income tax rate. In addition, the amounts and expiration dates of
operating loss and tax credit carry forwards for tax purposes must be disclosed.
40. (1) One of the flaws remaining in tax allocation procedures is that no recognition is
given to the fact that a future obligation, or loss of benefits, should be discounted
rather than shown at its entire amount as today's tax deferred accounts actually are.
The FASB has reviewed the issue and decided not to address it because of the
conceptual and implementation issues involved. (2) Another flaw is that the Board
allowed parent companies to avoid providing taxes on unremitted earnings of
subsidiaries and other specialized exceptions to the requirements of deferred tax
accounting.
41. A The determination of the earnings level of an enterprise, which is relevant to the
purpose of the analyst, is a complex analytical process. The earnings figure can be
converted into a per-share amount that is useful in evaluating the price of the
common stock, its dividend coverage, and the potential effects of dilution. As with
any measure, there are strengths and weaknesses associated with its computation.
Thus, the analyst must have a thorough understanding of the principles that govern
6-15
the computation of earnings per share to effectively analyze it and use it in decision
making.
6-16
42. A Earnings per share data are used in making investment decisions. They are used in
evaluating the past operating performance of a company and in forming an opinion
as to its future potential. They are commonly presented in prospectuses, proxy
material, and reports to stockholders, and is the only financial statement ratio that is
audited. They are used in the compilation of business earnings data for the press,
statistical services, and other publications. When presented with formal financial
statements, they assist the investor in weighing the significance of a corporation's
current net income and of changes in its net income from period to period in relation
to the shares an analyst holds or may acquire.
Current GAAP regarding EPS conforms to international standards. The analyst
must be aware that basic EPS does not take into account securities that, although not
common stock, are in substance equivalent to common stock. The analyst must take
care to focus on diluted EPS, which intends to show the maximum extent of potential
dilution of current earnings that conversions of securities could create.
43. A Diluted earnings per share is the amount of current earnings per share reflecting the
maximum dilution that would result from conversions, exercises, and other
contingent issuances that individually would decreased earnings per share and in the
aggregate yield a dilutive effect. All such issuances are assumed to have taken place
at the beginning of the period (or at the time the contingency arose, if later).
44. A The amount of any dividends on preferred stock that have been paid (declared) for
the year should be deducted from net income before computing earnings per share.
45. A Yes, if warrants or options are present, an increase in the market price of the
common stock can increase the number of common equivalent shares by decreasing
the number of shares repurchasable under the treasury stock method.
46. A SFAS 128 has a number of flaws and inconsistencies that the analyst must consider
in interpreting EPS data:
(a) The computation of basic EPS completely ignores the potentially dilutive effects
of options and warrants.
(b) There is a basic inconsistency in treating certain securities as the equivalent of
common stock for purposes of computing EPS while not considering them as part
of the stockholders' equity in the balance sheet. Consequently, the analyst will
have difficulty in interrelating reported EPS with the debt-leverage position
pertaining to the same earnings.
(c) Generally, EPS are considered to be a factor influencing stock prices. Whether
options and warrants are dilutive or not depends on the price of the common
stock. Thus we can get a circular effect in that the reporting of EPS may influence
the market price which, in turn, influences EPS. Under these rules earnings may
depend on market prices of the stock rather than only on economic factors within
the enterprise. In the extreme, this suggests that the projection of future EPS
requires not only the projection of earnings levels but also the projection of future
market prices.
47. A (a) Earnings per share data are used in making investment decisions. They are
used in evaluating the past operating performance of a company and in forming
an opinion as to its future potential.
They are commonly presented in
prospectuses, proxy material, and reports to stockholders. They are used in the
compilation of business earnings data for the press, statistical services, and other
publications. When
6-17
presented with formal financial statements, they assist the investor in weighing the
significance of a corporation's current net income and of changes in its net
income from period to period in relation to the shares an analyst holds or may
acquire.
(b) Earnings per common share are not fully relevant to the valuation of preferred
stock. For purposes of preferred stock evaluation, the earnings coverage ratio of
preferred stock is among the most relevant. It measures the number of times
preferred dividends have been earned and, thus, is a measure of the safety of the
dividend as well as the safety of the preferred issue.
6-18
EXERCISES
Exercise 6-1 (25 minutes)
a. Cash
xxx
Gain on disposition*
Net assets of discontinued operations
* (A loss on disposition would be recorded as a debit)
xxx
xxx
6-19
Exercise 6-2continued
(3) The reserving technique makes reported earnings less indicative of
fundamental trends in the company. The effects of the economic cycle are
reduced, making correlation techniques (such as GNP growth vs. EPS
growth) invalid. These reported numbers might mislead the uninformed
investor. In contrast to the artificial smoothing referred to earlier, the
company's growth rate may be exaggerated, by over-reserving for losses in
a bad year, and subsequent writing off of the reserve.
It should be noted that a reserve can be properly taken such as when it
recognizes a liability that (1) likely exists in the relatively near futuresuch as
costs of winding up a plant shutdown with the next year or (2) is subject to
quantificationsuch as the outright expropriation of net assets in a foreign
country.
b. If the analyst is able to discern the impact of reserves, s/he should exclude the
reserves' impact from accounting income when assessing past trends. Only
operating or normal earnings should be compared over the short-term.
However, over a longer period of time, the losses against which reserves have
been taken should be included. In estimating future earnings, the analyst
must carefully consider the impact of reserves and exclude the impact when
forecasting normal earnings. By doing this, the analyst will have a better
understanding of the true operations of the company. In the valuation of
common stock, the analyst must focus on the sustainable earning power of
the company. Thus, earnings may have to be adjusted upward or downward
depending on the degree of abuse of reserves.
c. Several examples of reserves are cited in the chapter. Also, students often
benefit from a review of business magazines in attempting to identify such
reserves.
(CFA Adapted)
6-20
Exercise 6-3continued
b. A change in the expected service life of an asset arising because of more
experience with the asset is a change in accounting estimate. A change in
accounting estimate occurs because future events and their effects cannot be
perceived with certainty. Estimates are an inherent part of the accounting
process. Therefore, accounting and reporting for certain financial statement
elements requires the exercise of judgment, subject to revision based on
experience.
c. 1. The cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle is the difference
between: (1) the amount of retained earnings at the beginning of the period
of change and (2) the amount of retained earnings that would have been
reported at that date if the new accounting principle had been used in prior
periods.
2. FASB 2005 Statement Accounting Changes and Error Corrections
requires that effective in 2005, companies should apply the retrospective
approach to changes in accounting principle. Thus, all presented periods
must be restated as if the change were in effect during those periods, and
any cumulative effect from periods before those presented is an
adjustment to beginning retained earnings of the earliest period presented.
d. Consistent use of accounting principles from one accounting period to
another enhances the usefulness of financial statements in comparative
analysis of accounting data across time.
e. If a change in accounting principle occurs, the nature and effect of a change in
accounting principle should be disclosed to avoid misleading financial
statement users. There is a presumption that an accounting principle, once
adopted, should not be changed in accounting for events and transactions of
a similar type.
f. Mandatory accounting changes are largely non-discretionary.
Thus,
managerial discretion is not present, or at least is to a lesser degree. One
should examine the motivations for voluntary accounting changes and assess
any earnings quality impact.
g. Mandatory accounting changes are largely non-discretionary. However, there
is often a window of time for a company to adopt a mandatory accounting
change. If a window exists, management has discretion as to the timing of the
adoption. Thus, the timing of adoption and any accounting ramifications
should be considered. For example, if a manager is going to adopt an
accounting change that includes a large charge, the manager might choose to
adopt in a relatively poor quarter to attempt to potentially conceal or downplay
the poor operating performance.
6-21
Exercise 6-3concluded
h. Mandatory accounting changes often include the recognition of retroactive
earnings affects. For example, the rules in accounting for other postemployment benefits require that companies establish a liability for the
accrued benefits to date. This results in a large charge for many companies.
Of course, the market potentially views the charge as largely the fault of
accounting rule makers. Thus, managers have incentive to increase the
amount of the charge and use the bloated liability to increase future earnings.
* The unexpected return on pension fund assets ($40,000) does not affect net income or
stockholders equity in the current period.
6-22
6-23
Exercise 6-5concluded
of reported net income. Thus, in the vast majority of cases for which the
sales basis is used, estimating errors, though unavoidable, will be too
immaterial in amount to warrant deferring revenue recognition to a later
point in time.
c. 1. During production. This basis of recognizing revenue is frequently used by
companies whose major source of revenue are long-term construction
projects. For these companies the point of sale is far less significant to the
earning process than is production activity because the sale is assured
under the contract, except of course where performance is not
substantially in accordance with the contract terms. To defer revenue
recognition until the completion of long-term construction projects could
impair significantly the usefulness of the intervening annual financial
statements because the volume of completed contracts during a period is
likely to bear no relationship to production volume. During each year that a
project is in process a portion of the contract price is therefore
appropriately recognized as that year's revenue. The amount of the
contract price to be recognized should be proportionate to the year's
production progress on the project. It should be noted that the use of the
production basis in lieu of the sales basis for the timing of revenue
recognition is justifiable only when total profit or loss on the contracts can
be estimated with reasonable accuracy and its ultimate realization is
reasonably assured.
2. When cash is received. The most common application of this basis for the
timing of revenue recognition is in connection with installment sales
contracts. Its use is justified on the grounds that, due to the length of the
collection period, increased risks of default, and higher collection costs,
there is too much uncertainty to warrant revenue recognition until cash is
received. The mere fact that sales are made on an installment contract
basis does not justify using the cash receipts basis of revenue recognition.
The justification for this departure from the sales depends essentially upon
an absence of a reasonably objective basis for estimating the amount of
collection costs and bad debts that will be incurred in later periods. If
these expenses can be estimated with reasonable accuracy, the sales
basis should be used.
(AICPA Adapted)
6-24
6-25
6-26
Exercise 6-9concluded
on hand at the end of an accounting period, the costs of insurance coverage
relating to future periods, and the costs of self-constructed plant or
equipment.
d. In the absence of a direct basis for associating asset cost with revenue, and if
the asset provides benefits for two or more accounting periods, its cost
should be allocated to these periods (as an expense) in a systematic and
rational manner. When it is impractical, or impossible, to find a close
cause-and-effect relationship between revenue and cost, this relationship is
often assumed to exist. Therefore, the asset cost is allocated to the
accounting periods by some method. The allocation method used should
appear reasonable to an unbiased observer and should be followed
consistently from period to period. Examples of systematic and rational
allocation of asset cost would include depreciation of fixed assets,
amortization of intangibles, and allocation of rent and insurance.
e. A cost should be treated as a loss when an unfavorable event results from an
activity other than a normal business activity. The matching of losses to
specific revenue should not be attempted because, by definition, they are
expired service potentials not related to revenue produced. That is, losses
resulting from extraneous and exogenous events that are not recurring or
anticipated as necessary in the process of producing revenue. There is no
simple way of identifying a loss, because ascertaining whether a cost should
be a loss is often a matter of judgment. The accounting distinction between an
asset, expense, loss, and prior-period adjustment is not clear-cut. For
example, an expense is usually voluntary, planned, and expected as necessary
in the generation of revenue. But a loss is a measure of the service potential
expired that is considered abnormal, unnecessary, unanticipated, and
possibly nonrecurring and is usually not taken into direct consideration in
planning the size of the revenue stream.
(AICPA Adapted)
Exercise 6-10 (15 minutes)
a. Research and development costs are expensed in the year that they are
incurred. This means R&D costs impact current income dollar for dollar. Also,
to the extent that research and development efforts lead to future revenues,
this is a violation of the matching principle in relating costs to revenues in
determining future income.
b. R&D expenditures at Frontier Biotech decreased substantially in fiscal 2006.
As a result, fiscal 2006 net income is substantially higher. However, this may
not be a good signal for future profitability. To the extent that one has
confidence in the ability of the R&D department at Frontier Biotech, future
revenues may be compromised by managements decision to curtail research
efforts.
6-28
6-29
Exercise 6-12concluded
f. Total compensation cost to be recognized will depend upon the accounting
rules applied. Under APB 25, total compensation cost is $0; computed as the
intrinsic value of the options times the number of shares, or [($20$20) x
100,000 shares]. Under SFAS 123, the 81,538 options (rounded up) are
expected to vest based on the 4% forfeiture rate. Specifically, 100,000 x 4% =
4,000 options in 2000; 96,000 x 4% = 3,840 options in 2001; 92,160 x 4% =
3,686 options in 2002; 88,474 x 4% = 3,539 options in 2003; and 84,935 x 4% =
3,397 options in 2004. Consequently, $652,304 in total compensation expense
should be recognized (81,538 options x $8 fair value per option).
g. Compensation cost should be allocated over the service period, years 2004
through 2008.
h. The employee stock option plan transfers wealth from stockholders to
employees by granting potential ownership rights to employees with less than
full buy-in to acquire these ownership rights. That is, if existing ownership
were diluted via a normal issuance of shares to investors, contributed capital
received from the investors would be much greater than that received from the
exercise price of stock options.
6-30
6-31
6-32
6-33
PROBLEMS
Problem 6-1 (30 minutes)
The income statements of Disposo Corp. should be shown as follows
Year 8 Year 7
Sales.............................................................................
$775
$600
Costs and expenses ..................................................
(657)
(576)
Pretax income..............................................................
118
24
Tax expense.................................................................
(59)
(12)
Income from continuing operations .........................
$ 59
$ 12
Discontinued operations:
Operations (net of tax) [a].....................................
(3)
8
Disposal (net of $6 tax) [b]...................................
(6)
Net Income...................................................................
$ 50
$ 20
[a] Represents net income (loss) from operations for Year 7 and for Year 8 until
August 15.
[b] Represents:
Loss from operations August 15 to December 31.......................
$ (1)
Loss on sale of assets (after $5 tax).............................................
(5)
Total.................................................................................................
$ (6)
The $10 loss and related tax benefit of $5 would still be recorded (anticipated) at
December 31, Year 8 (the asset would be reduced by $10 to market value).
6-34
6-35
11
$194.5
10
$184.1
9
$175.9
5.9
18.6
11.9
17.4
54.7
35.0
$211.9
$238.8
$210.9
(i)
b. Identification of Amounts & Sources (combining federal, state and foreign taxes):
11
10
9
1. Earnings before income taxes [26]..........................
$667.4
$179.4 $106.5
2. Expected income tax @ 34% (confirmed by [134])....
226.9
61.0
36.2
3. Total income tax expense [27]..................................
265.9
175.0
93.4
4. Total income tax due *...............................................
230.4
171.1
161.2
5. Total income tax due and not yet paid [44].............
67.7
46.4
30.1
*Includes items [122], [123], and [124].
101.4 56.5
[137] Nondeductible amortization of
intangibles.................................................
4.0
0.6
1.6 0.9
[138] Foreign earnings not taxed or taxed
at other than statutory rate...................... (2.0) (0.3)
2.2 1.2
[139] Other.......................................................... 16.7
2.5
2.2 1.2
51.9
48.7
1.2
1.1
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.1
$93.4
87.7
[134]
34.0
[135]
3.7
[136]
Totals..........................................................$265.6
d. Campbell can probably deduct for tax purposes only cash actually spent in
Year 10 for these charges. If this is so, an estimate of cash spent is (see item
[105]):
$339.1 - $301.6 = $37.5; $37.5 / 34% = $110 million
6-36
a.
b.
Dam Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Book income
1 $24,000
$ 72,000
$ 24,000
Book income
37,800
75,600
$ 12,600
Book income
15,000
45,000
75,000
$ 15,000
150,000
$124,800
$144,600
$ 87,600
$ 15,000
$396,000
Taxable income
Taxable income
Taxable income
Year 5
126,000
$120,000
$126,000
150,000
$150,000
$396,000
$(38,400) $(135,000 )
$ 24,600
$ 62,400
$ 12,300
$ 19,200
6-37
$150,000
$126,000
$124,800
126,000
$120,000
$24,000
Total
$120,000
$120,000
c.
$24,000
Year 4
$ 67,500
($ in thousands)
Year 5
Year 6
a. Income Statement
Sales................................................................
$10,000 $10,000
Expenses *......................................................
Income before tax..........................................
9,000
$10,000
9,000
$ 1,000 $ 1,000 $
10,400
(400)
Tax expense:
Current **....................................................
300
500
Deferred.....................................................
500
200
(700)
500 $
500 $
(200)
500 $
500 $
(200)
600
300
500
Note: The timing difference regarding deferred preoperating costs is $1,400 in Year 4.
However, only $1,000 of this amount results in a reduction of Year 4 taxable income (the
remaining $400 becomes a loss carryforward and reduces taxable income in Year 5). The
tax effect (at 50 percent) of these differences is $500 in Year 4 and $200 in Year 5. The
entire timing difference reverses in Year 6.
b. Balance Sheet
Current tax payable......................................
Deferred tax payable....................................
6-38
$ 300
$ 500
500
700
15
20
$200 $400
50 120
100
20
30
8
$500 $600
200 250
40
50
$260 $300
17.5
25
92.5 130
(52.5)
65
32.5
150
17.5
25 (247.5)
65
65
125
$130 $150
130
150
32.5
Net income (**).............................. $10 $17.5 $25 $(247.5) $130 $157.5 $130 $150
6-39
Since average market price of stock exceeds exercise price of options, the
options are dilutive. Using treasury stock method for options we obtain:
i. 200,000 shares $15 = $3,000,000 proceeds
ii. $3,000,000 / 20 average price = 150,000 shares purchased in open market
Thus, 50,000 additional shares would be issued.
Are the convertible bonds dilutive? No. Assuming conversion of bonds, 100,000
additional shares would be issued. The net income adjustment would be:
Interest expense related to bonds...........................
$500,000
Less taxes..................................................................
(200,000)
Increase in net income.............................................
$300,000
Consequently:
EPS = ($6,500,000+$300,000)/(2,500,000+100,000) = $2.62
Diluted EPS = $6,500,000/(2,500,000+50,000) = $2.55
6-40
CASES
Case 6-1 (50 minutes)
a. Balance Sheets and Income Statements with Alternative Revenue Recognition:
Shipment
Production b
Collection
Balance Sheet
Cash .......................................................
Receivables............................................
Inventory, at cost...................................
Inventory, at market...............................
Total assets............................................
$1,670
1,800
700
-$4,170
$1,670
1,800
700
-$4,170
$1,670
1,800
-900
$4,370
$1,670
1,800
-790c
$4,260
-$ 180
-3,000
990
$4,170
-$ 180
180a
3,000
810
$4,170
-$ 180
-3,000
1,080
$4,260
Income Statement
Sales............................................$9,900
Costs and expenses:
Cost of goods sold............................
Selling expense.................................
Shipping expense..............................
Net income.............................................
$8,100 $10,800
7,700
990
220
$ 990
20
270
-3,000
1,080
$4,370
$9,900
6,300
8,400
810
1,080
180
240
$ 810 $ 1,080
7,610d
990
220
$1,080
Notes:
a. Deferred income: Sales is $1,800 less costs of ($1,400 + $180 + $40) = $180.
b. Time of production: Figures can be reflected gross as in left column or net as in right
column.
c. Inventory, at net realizable value $790 = $900 less $20 less $90.
d. Cost of goods sold is a "to-balance" figure based on inventory (for example, Beg. $0 plus
purchases $8,400 less End. $790 = COGS $7,610).
6-41
Case 6-1continued
b. The installment method delays the reporting of revenues and thereby delays
the time for payment of taxes. The time value of money is a major motivation
for delaying cash payments for taxes.
c. Balance Sheet: Some analysts prefer the installment method because it is
more conservative. However, the installment method attempts to value
receivables (less deferred income) at the historical cost of the inventory. It
would appear that the credit analyst should be future-oriented and view
receivables at the expected future cash inflow.
Income Statement: Some analysts prefer the installment method because it is
more conservative. However, this method has two critical weaknesses:
(i) Revenues and profits are not recognized when performance (earning)
occurs; instead, recognition is delayed until cash is collected.
(ii) Selling costs are mismatched (this is most dramatic in a period of rapid
growth or decline in sales).
The installment method does not show economic reality.
6-42
Year 9
100%
66.0%
68.6%
70.5%
15.4%
15.8%
14.4%
Administrative expenses............................................
4.9%
4.7%
4.4%
0.9%
0.9%
0.8%
Interest expense..........................................................
1.9%
1.8%
1.7%
Interest income............................................................
-0.4%
-0.3%
-0.7%
0.0%
0.1%
0.3%
Other expense.............................................................
0.4%
0.2%
0.6%
0.0%
5.5%
6.0%
6-43
Case 6-2concluded
d. Campbell reports $339.1 million and $343.0 million in divestitures,
restructuring and unusual charges in Years 10 and 9, respectively.
Restructuring costs typically include asset write-downs and severance costs.
Asset write-downs are non-cash charges that typically relate to reduced cash
flows of those assets that likely have occurred over several prior years.
Severance costs typically relate to accruals of costs that will not be paid until
some future period.
e. Removal of costs relating to depreciable assets will reduce future
depreciation expense. A cost is, therefore, recognized in the current period
that would have been recognized in future periods, thus shifting income from
the present into the future. Similarly, severance costs include the accrual of a
liability for future costs. This liability is reduced in future periods instead of
recording an expense, thus increasing future periods profitability.
6-44
81
81
Severance/Closing Costs.....................
Restruc.
29
25
PP&E Write-Down..................................
Restruc.
155
155
Other.......................................................
Restruc.
29
24
164
130
Total Restructuring................................
294
266
39
39
20
13
20
TOTAL..............................................
353
279
184
169
253
179
74
Markdown-Store Closedowns..............
CGS
29
27
63
57
TOTAL..............................................
345
229
238
107
GRAND TOTAL.......................................
698
508
422
276
6-45
Case 6-3continued
2.
RECAST INCOME STATEMENT AFTER REMOVING CHARGE
1999
1998
Reported
Recast
Reported
$
%
$
%
$
%
Net Sales......................................................................
11170
100% 11170
100%
11038
100%
7846
70.2%
7710
69.8%
Gross Profit..................................................................
2979 26.7%
3324
29.8%
3328
30.2%
2384
21.3%
2231
20.2%
Depreciation.................................................................
255
2.3%
255
2.3%
253
2.3%
Restructuring Charge.................................................
294
2.6%
0.0%
0.0%
93
0.8%
72
0.7%
592
5.3%
772
7.0%
Tax Provision...............................................................
26
0.2%
216
1.9%
282
2.6%
376
3.4%
490
4.4%
Total Charge.................................................................
508
4.5%
(132)
-1.2%
490
4.4%
6-46
Case 6-3continued
3.
Elements of Restructuring Plan and Expected Economic Effects
Element
Store
Closing
C3 PlanStore
Reformatti
ng etc
Consolidati on of
distribution
centers
and admin offices
Legal
Contingenc
ies
TOTAL
Description
Close 50
international and
9 Toys R Us
stores that do
not meet
strategic
profitability
objectives
Close 31 US
Kids R Us
stores and
convert 28
nearby Toys R
Us stores into
combo stores
Cost
Leases
Severance etc
PPE Write down
Markdown
Acctg change &
legal settlements
Total
Expected Economic
Effects
81 Sales reduction $ 322
29 MM, operating loss
155 saving $ 5 MM pa
29 2600 employees
terminated ($ 100-150
39 MM pa saving)
333
Closings: Eliminate
loss making
stores/focus on more
profitable opportunities
Combo Stores: Release
working capital, lower
operating costs,
increase productivity
Reformat stores,
expand product
lines
Supply chain
reengineering
Markdown
Systems Refined
Total
Consolidate
distribution
centers/warehou
ses
Consolidate 6
admin offices
FTC related 3rd
party claim
Other
29
20
253
63
316
698
6-47
Expected savings $ 97
MM pa
Case 6-3continued
4. The restructuring liability can be purposefully overstated to create a hidden
reserve. This hidden reserve can be used to manage earnings in at least
two ways. First, the company can charge some operating expenses of
future periods to the restructuring liability. Second, the company can
reverse a portion of the charge to create net income in the period of the
reversal.
In the case of Toys R Us it is unlikely that it is managing its earnings.
Using charges to manage earnings is a form of classificatory earnings
management (see Chapter 2). However, by burying various elements of the
charge in different line items the very purpose of the charge, i.e., inducing
users to ignore the entire charge is lost. Therefore it is not likely that the
purpose of the restructuring charge was earnings management.
5. The following adjustments would be made to the financial statements to
recast the restructuring charge as an investment to create future cost
savings. First, the charge is recorded as an asset and amortized over 10
years. Second, 20x8 income is increased by reversing the charge. Income
in fiscal 20x9 and the next 10 years will then be reduced by a pro-rata
amount of the investment.
6. The relative success of restructuring activities can and must be assessed.
The company should report higher return on assets and higher return on
equity. Also, the company should report substantially lower costs such as
selling and administrative costs. These costs should also decrease as a
percentage of sales.
Case 6-4 (60 minutes)
a. Basic Earnings Per Share Computations:
Basic EPS = $1,500,000 / 900,000 shares = $1.67
Diluted Earnings Per Share Computations:
The warrants are dilutive since the average market price of common stock
($13) exceeds the exercise price of the warrants ($10).
i. 900,000 shares x $10 = $9,000,000 proceeds
ii. $9,000,000 / $13 = 692,307 shares purchased in open market
Thus, 207,693 additional shares would be issued.
As if EPS = $1,500,000/(900,000+207,693) = $1.35
Are the subordinated convertible debentures dilutive? Yes. Assuming
conversion, a total of 500,000 ($9,000,000/$18) additional common shares
would be issued at June 30, Year 1. The net income adjustment would be:
Interest expense for debentures.....................
$270,000
Less taxes.........................................................
(135,000)
Increase in net income....................................
$135,000
6-48
$540,000
105,000
87,500
$732,500
$1,500,000
1,500,000
500,000
$3,000,000
$80,000
(40,000)
$40,000
1 yr.
1/2 yr.
6-49
10,000 sh.
1,000 sh.
11,000 sh.