Design Basis
Design Basis
REPORT OF
INDIA PAVILION AT WORLD EXPO 2010, SHANGHAI
04
Rev
29/05/2009
Date
CLIENT:- ITPO
Description
Approved By:-
ARCHITECT:-
STUCTURAL CONSULTANTS :-
NAME OF PROJECT:-
DESIGNED BY:
DATE
DOCUMENT
STATUS
14/12/2008
For Approval
CHECKED
BY
APPROVED BY:
DOC. NO.
DESCRIPTION
SHANGHAI
REV.NO.
SPA/(Shanghai
Expo)/DBR/01
04
SHEET
SIZE
A4
NO.OF
SHEETS
8
1.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
1.1
1.2
Type of Building: Dome (Composite structure: R.C.C. & Bamboo)
& Steel frame structure for shops/others with pre-cast ribbed roof slab.
2.
Location: SHANGHAI
STRUCTURAL DESIGN :
The main considerations followed for the design of structure are:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
Durability.
(f)
Economy.
(g)
Recyclability.
3.
3.1
Dome
The nearly hemispherical dome has a diameter of 34 m at the bottom. The
structure has 36 meridional rib segments at a maximum a/c spacing of 3 m at the
base, sitting on a RCC ring beam, and connected at the top to a 5.0 m dia. steel
ring. The section of the bottom RCC ring beam is 650 x 450 mm. This ring beam
is supported on 12 peripheral steel columns dividing it into 12 equal segments.
The dome structure comprises of a bamboo grid with both meridional and
circumferential members. In cross section, the meridional members each are
comprised of a bunch of six 100 mm dia. bamboos, and the circumferential ones
are a single 100 mm dia. bamboo @ 0.5 m c/c.
For the slab which forms the floor of the exhibit area under the dome, the
structure uses a steel frame with RCC pre-cast pre-stressed hollow slabs. Below
this are the stores, green room and equipment room.
3.2
3.3
Foundations
3.3. A. The site has poor quality soil. Hence, pile foundation is proposed for the structure.
In order to speed construction and allow for dismantling later, steel piles are
proposed; these are usual locally.
3.3. B. Survey done after the geo-tech report has revealed a subway influence zone on
the west side of the site which restricts digging in the south-west part of the site.
Hence isolated foundation is suggested in this area. So we go for isolated footings
only in grids 10 to 17 at G to U.
4.
SPECIFICATIONS USED
1
4.1
All the buildings have been designed as framed structures in accordance with the
relevant Indian Codes of Practice for civil works i.e. IS: 456-2000,, IS: 800-1984,
IS 875, IS 1893-2002, IS 4326-1976, IS -13920-1993, NBC 2005 and Expo
temporary building, live loads and settlement criteria for different types of footing
was taken from structure design standards (Chinese code).
Wind and seismic loads have been taken to be those applicable to a similar
structure at Delhi. From personal enquiry it was established that for Shanghai
these loads will be considered as conservative.
5.0
LOADS CONSIDERED
The structure is analyzed for all possible combinations of loads i.e. gravity loads
(dead and live loads), earthquake load and wind loads. The vibration caused by a
small proposed wind turbine is not eccentric, low frequency, and isolated, so not
considered significant.
5.1
Dead Load:
The dead load on the structure includes all the permanent loads such as those of
the structural components.
The dead load thus comprises of the weight of all walls, partitions, floors, roofs
and also includes the weight of all other permanent constructions in the buildings
and shall conform to IS: 1911-Schedule of unit weights of buildings materials.
Unit weight of various materials used in the structural members is taken as
follows:
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
i.
j.
k.
l.
m.
n.
o.
Water
RCC
Plaster
Brickwork
Soil
Cinder/foam concrete filling
Partition wall/Cubicles
Bamboo
Sheet Roofing materials
Steel
Sand
Ferro-Cement
Concrete pavers
Foam Concrete
Hollow precast slab
1.0 T/cum
2.5 T/cum
2.4 T/cum
2.0 T/cum
1.8 T/cum
1.0 T/cum
1.5 T/cum
0.6 T/cum
1.6 T/cum
7.85 T/cum
2.0 T/cum
2.4 T/cum
2.4 T/cum
0.6 T/cum
1.6 T/cum
= 2.5 x 0.05
= 2.0 x .075
= 0.125 T/m2
= 0.15 T/m2
Total
= 0.675 T/m2
= 0.70 T/m2
Dome Roof:
Ferro-cement (40 mm thick)
= 2.4 x .04
= 0.96 T/m2
Water proofing plaster (20 mm thick)= 2.4 x 0.020 = 0.048 T/m2
Uniform load for 150mm thk. planter tray = 1.8 x 0.15 = 0.27 T/m2
Miscellaneous (steel cables etc.)
= 0.05 T/m2
Total
= 0.464 T/m2
= 0.50T/m2
= 2.4 x 0.05
= 2.4 x 0.05
= 1.6 x .12
= 0.12T/m2
= 0.12 T/m2
= 0.192 T/m2
= 0.05 T/m2
Total
= 0.482 T/m2
= 0.50T/m2
Wall load:
Load of 230mm thick brick wall
Load of 115mm thick brick wall
= 0.46 T/m2
= 0.23 T/m2
= 1.4 T/m
= 0.7 T/m
= 0.4 T/m
= 0.5 T / m2
(b)
= 0.3 T / m2
(b)
= 0.3 T / m2
= 0.04 T / m2
(c)
5.3
Seismic Load:
Response spectrum method was used as per IS: 1893 (Part-1) 2002 with the
following data:
Design Horizontal Seismic Coefficient = (Z x I x (Sa/g))/(2 x R)
Where (Sa/g) = Average response acceleration coefficient
Zone factor Z
= 0.24 (zone IV).
Importance factor I = 1.0
Response reduction factor R =5.0
Ductile detailing is being done as per IS: 13920
5.4
Wind Load:
The wind load has been taken as per IS: 875 (Part-3)-1987 and wind pressure
calculation done as follows:
pz= 0.6 Vz2 N/sqm
Vz = K1 K2 K3 Vb
Where,
Vz =Design wind velocity
K1 =Probability factor or risk coefficient, taken as 0.71 from T- 1
K2=Terrain, height and structure size factor, category 1 and class
B is taken as 1.07 from Table 2.
180
0.40 + 0.20 = 0.60
For the cylindrical wall, the external pressure coefficients (Cpe) are taken from
Table 21 of NBC of India (1983) for H/D=1 and internal pressure co-efficient
(Cpi) for normal opening is taken as 0.2. Thus, total pressure co-efficient (Cpe
+ Cpi) are taken for different position of periphery by linear interpolation as
follows:
POSITION OF
Total pressure co-efficient
PERIPHERY
( Cpe + Cpi )
0
1.0 +0.20 = 1.20
6
0.92 +0.20 =1.12
12
0.84 +0.20 =1.04
.so on
60
-1.20 0.20 = -1.40
180
-0.40 0.20 = -0.60
6.
7.1
7.2
For seismic load evaluation response spectrum is used. Minimum base shear and
mass participation factor as per IS:1893-2002 is considered in the design.
8.
Load Combinations:
1.
For the design of steel members which are designed on the basis of the
working stress approach, the following load combinations are taken.
D.L. + L.L.
D.L. + W.L.
D.L. + L.L. + W.L.
D.L. + 0.5 L.L. Eq
33% increase in permissible stress is allowed when considering wind and seismic
forces.
2.
For the design of concrete sections which are designed with the limit state
method, the following load combinations are taken:
1.5 (D.L. + L.L.)
1.2 (D.L. + L.L. + W.L.)
1.2 (D.L.) + W.L.)
1.2 (D.L. + 0.5 L.L. Eq)
9.
Notations
D.L.
L.L.
Eq
W.L.
10.
=
=
=
=
Dead Load
Live Load
Earthquake Load in X-direction/Z-direction
Wind Load in X-direction/Z-direction
Materials:
Concrete Grade:
Concrete mix of M25 conforming with IS:456 and CPWD specifications are used.
Steel Reinforcement:
Fe 415 Grade (TMT - bars) conforming with IS:1786.
Structural Steel: Factory Rolled Mild Steel with yield stress = 308 MPa
Bamboo: Moso variety from China*
_____________________________________________________________________
* Properties deduced from the reference:
H.Q. Yu, Z.H. Ziang, C.W. Hse and T.F. Shupe, Selected Physical and
Mechanical Properties of MOSO Bomboo, Jnl. of Tropical Forest Science
20(4):258-263 (2008).
11
Design Standards :
All the relevant IS codes, Chinese codes & specifications are followed.
1
2
3