Source: Personnel Today Issue: 26 January 2010
Source: Personnel Today Issue: 26 January 2010
Nick Thomas, senior associate, Jones Day, answers questions on bullying in the
workplace.
There has been substantial recent press coverage regarding the issue of workplace bullying
- much of it sparked by a Unison survey suggesting that bullying at work has doubled in
the past 10 years, with one in three staff claiming they've been bullied in the past six
months.
While this statistic may itself be surprising, a general increase in cases of bullying is
probably not.
Such behaviour need not necessarily be directed by a senior employee towards a more
junior one. Bullying also takes place between peers, as demonstrated by the practice of
"mobbing", where a group of employees target a single co-worker and, through the use of
e-mails, comments and general conduct towards that worker, make their working
environment a highly unpleasant one.
A Workplace bullying can have a number of undesirable effects, including poor morale,
poor performance and loss of productivity due to increased levels of absence. In a legal
context, we are seeing an increased number of tribunal claims in which allegations of
bullying form a substantial part.
Generally, such allegations feature in one of two ways. Often it is alleged that bullying
behaviour is based on, or makes reference to, someone's race, sex, age, sexual orientation,
religion and/or a disability (the "prohibited characteristics"). Such conduct will amount to
either direct unlawful discrimination, unlawful harassment, or both. An employee is
entitled to bring such a claim even if they remain employed. If successful, they would be
entitled to receive an award for injury to feelings of between £500 and £30,000, depending
upon the severity of the treatment to which they have been subjected.
Where the behaviour complained of results in an employee resigning, and provided they
have at least one year's service, they will be entitled to claim constructive unfair dismissal.
If successful, an employee will be entitled to recover the losses that they have suffered as a
consequence of the termination of their employment up to the statutory cap of £66,200. If
it is alleged that the bullying conduct which led to the constructive dismissal was based on
one of the protected characteristics (or because they have blown the whistle on the
wrongdoing of their employer or a co-worker), there is no requirement for the employee to
have one year's service to bring their claim. In addition, the statutory cap on damages falls
away, and the employee would also be entitled to an injury to feelings award as referred to
above.
Either way, the message is clear: an employer that permits bullying within the workplace
is exposing themselves to significant financial risk.
A The Acas guide makes a number of suggestions, including operating a specific policy on
bullying and harassment, providing training for managers (this should cover both avoiding
bullying behaviour when managing subordinates and how to monitor and identify bullying
between members of a manager's team), and maintaining comprehensive procedures to
deal promptly with any complaints received from employees. These suggestions are
clearly sound and are already in situ in many workplaces.
However, perhaps the single most important factor in minimising incidents of bullying in
the workplace is that employers are seen to be proactively promoting a non-bullying
environment, responding swiftly and appropriately to complaints that they receive. It is
practical evidence of a zero-tolerance approach to bullying that is most likely to deter the
would-be bully, and to provide their potential victim with the confidence to report
instances at an early stage before they have time to become more widespread.