Operations Golden Rules
Operations Golden Rules
Introduction
Golden Rules have always guided human activities.
In early aviation days,
of basic airmanship.
the
Operations
Golden
Rules
defined
the
principles
Page 1 of 10
II
Statistical Data
The following factors frequently are identified as causal factor in approach-and-landing
accidents:
Factor
% of Events
74 %
72 %
63 %
52 %
48 %
45 %
45 %
33 %
communication
Interaction with automation
20 %
Table 1
Most Frequent Causal Factors in Approach-and-Landing Accidents
III
Page 2 of 10
The use of flight director (FD), autopilot (AP), autothrottle/autothrust (A/THR) and
flight management system (FMS) should be introduced progressively, as defined by
the applicable training syllabus.
Practice of hand flying will illustrate that the pilot flying (PF) always retains
the authority and capability to adopt:
Communicate :
Effective crew communication involves communications between flight crew and
controller, between flight crew members and between flight crew and cabin crew.
Communication allows sharing goals and intentions and enhancing crews situational
awareness.
In an abnormal or emergency condition, after a stable flight path has been regained
and the abnormal or emergency condition has been identified, the PF should inform the
ATC of the prevailing condition and of his/her intentions.
Page 3 of 10
To attract the
as applicable:
controllers
attention,
use
the
following
standard
phraseology,
Manage :
Managing the continuation of the flight is the next priority, this includes:
Specific Golden Rules to assist flight crew in their decision-making and management
process are provided in the second part of this Flight Operations Briefing Note.
The design of glass-cockpit aircraft fully supports the above four-step strategy,
as summarized in Table 2.
Golden Rule
Display Unit
Fly
PFD
Navigate
ND
Communicate
DCDU
Manage
Table 2
Glass-cockpit Design Supports Golden Rules
III.4 Cross check the accuracy of the FMS with raw data
When within navaids coverage area, FMS navigation accuracy should be cross-checked
against navaids raw-data (unless aircraft is GPS-equipped and GPS PRIMARY is
available).
Page 4 of 10
Comparing the resulting FMS DIST TO reading with the DME distance read on
the RMI (or on ND, as applicable);
Checking the difference between FMS DIST TO and DME distance against the criteria
applicable for the flight phase (as defined in SOPs).
If the required FMS navigation accuracy criteria is not achieved, revert from NAV mode
to selected heading mode with reference to navaids raw-data.
Select PF ND to ARC or ROSE mode. If no map shift is observed, PNF may keep ND in
MAP mode, with display of speed constraints and/or altitude constraints, for enhanced
horizontal and vertical situational awareness.
or from,
Page 5 of 10
last-minute change.
The correct level of automation often is the one the pilot feels the most comfortable
with, depending on his/her knowledge and experience of the aircraft and systems, skills
and confidence.
Reversion to hand-flying and manual thrust-control may be the correct level
of automation, for the prevailing conditions.
emergency procedure;
abnormal procedure(s).
Page 6 of 10
These actions should be accomplished in accordance with the published task sharing,
crew coordination principles and phraseology.
Critical or irreversible actions, such as selecting an engine fuel lever / master switch or
a fuel isolation valve to OFF, should be accomplished by the PNF but require prior
confirmation by the PF (i.e., confirmation loop).
IV
been
developed
to
promote
and
disseminate
Figure 3
Golden Rules Card
Page 7 of 10
Delaying actions, when possible (e.g., during takeoff and final approach); and/or,
Requesting entering
(as appropriate).
holding
pattern
or
requesting
delaying
vectors
ATC
and
company
maintenance,
Page 8 of 10
other
flight
Planned actions.
and
cabin
crewmembers
to
create
shared
VI
VII
Operating Philosophy,
Page 9 of 10
VIII
Regulatory References
This Flight Operations Briefing Note (FOBN) has been developed by Airbus in the frame of the Approach-and-Landing Accident
Reduction (ALAR) international task force led by the Flight Safety Foundation.
This FOBN is part of a set of Flight Operations Briefing Notes that provide an overview of the applicable standards,
flying techniques and best practices, operational and human factors, suggested company prevention strategies and personal
lines-of-defense related to major threats and hazards to flight operations safety.
This FOBN is intended to enhance the reader's flight safety awareness but it shall not supersede the applicable regulations
and the Airbus or airline's operational documentation; should any deviation appear between this FOBN and the Airbus or
airlines AFM / (M)MEL / FCOM / QRH / FCTM, the latter shall prevail at all times.
In the interest of aviation safety, this FOBN may be reproduced in whole or in part - in all media - or translated; any use of
this FOBN shall not modify its contents or alter an excerpt from its original context. Any commercial use is strictly excluded.
All uses shall credit Airbus and the Flight Safety Foundation.
Airbus shall have no liability or responsibility for the use of this FOBN, the correctness of the duplication, adaptation or
translation and for the updating and revision of any duplicated version.
Page 10 of 10