Industry & Practice
Industry & Practice
e Journal
VERSATILE.
Always a leading innovator, we supply customers
with cutting-edge diagnostic and system integrity
solutions. This, bound with our focus on flexibility,
reliability, cost and quality, leads to offerings
beyond your expectations.
www.rosen-group.com
ISSN 2196-4300
www.pipeline-journal.com
ARE!
C
O
T
E
R
DA
Conlexic Electra
(Red Electric Jellyfish)
Play Video
protection
The Conlexic Electra (Red Electric Jellyfish) is a special animal in that he
protects himself against natural enemies by issuing electric surges of up
to 60 volts. Seal For Lifes Anodeflex also understands how to make the
best use of electric currents for protection, but as cathodic protection for
critical pipeline assets. Effective electric current management alters the potential of pipelines to distribute evenly the corrosion reaction to the anode.
Anodeflex is an impressed current, flexible linear anode especially
designed for use in cathodic protection systems for underground
structures. Placed alongside a pipe or other buried metal
structure, Anodeflex provides uniform cathodic protection along the
entire length of the protected surface with minimum interference from
adjacent structures. When used in combination with other SFL anticorrosion products, such as Stopaq visco-elastic coatings, Anodeflex
systems provide the most effective anti-corrosion control on the market.
Editorial
Pipelines future energy backbones and investments with no regret
Driven by market mechanisms the natural gas grid has grown rapidly over the last
decades. These infrastructure investments can reveal their benefits in the decades to come:
The pipeline system is the backbone for:
the integration of renewables gas like biomethane or of excess power from wind
and solar via electrolysis or methanation
extended clean mobility based on proven CNG technology or mobile LNG units
However, there do exist future outlooks according to which the importance of the natural gas pipeline system is declining.
In general, two main arguments are stressed:
natural gas is a fossil fuel and its consumption should be reduced over time to match carbon reduction targets
future demand for heating would tend to Zero due to improved insulation of buildings.
But natural gas has the lowest emission among all fossil fuels and it should not be concealed that the activation of wind or solar plants
causes emission too. Natural gas infrastructure provides additional benefits especially where other techniques fail - like in case of
large scale and long-term energy storage.
The WEO has studies how an increased utilization of natural gas and of the existing capable infrastructure can lead to a reduction of
emissions. Also other researchers have proved that the costs for saving one ton of CO2 are significantly lower when the utilization
of modern gas appliances is pushed forward, when power-to-gas technologies are fosters to design the emission profile of the gas
accordingly instead of an investment into insulation of premises. Therefore, the natural gas system remains a warrantor for a safe &
reliable, an environmentally sustainable and last but not least - affordable future energy supply an option without regret that can
enfolds its strengths in a sensible interaction with power and renewables.
Yours Sincerely,
Conference Management
Dennis Fandrich, Director Conferences, Euro Institute for Information and Technology Transfer
Editorial
10
44
38
16
Content 2/2014
Industry & Practice
10
11
Czech NET4GAS Increases Reverse-Flow Capacity for Central and Eastern Europe
12
13
14
15
16
17
15
54
17
66
20
Energy Security Struggle In Caspian Region From The View Of Important Pipeline Projects
34
38
44
High-Efficient Heating Concept For Long-Distance Pipeline Transport Of Waxy / High Pour Point Crude Oil
54
66
88
90
Join the next Pipeline Technology Seminar Middle East in November 2014, Abu Dhabi
92
94
PTJ goes
interactive!
now with integrated
videofiles
Flawless
by Rosen. It can
A flaw detector
efects in a gas
d
st
e
ll
a
sm
e
th
find
pipeline.
by Gazprom
Alberta / Canada
Pembina Pipeline Corporation
Increases Capacity of Phase III
Pipeline Expansion and Secures
Additional Volumes
Page 13
London / England
GE and Accenture Announce
Breakthrough Industrial Internet
Technology for More Efficient Oil
and Gas Pipeline Operations
Oakland / USA
Page 15
Lingen / Germany
ROSEN has successfully
introduced a new service
addressing the MAOP
validation for pipelines
Texas / USA
Page 14
Haselnne / Germany
Leak Testing Goes Online with
Esders LIVE Cloud Technology
Page 17
Eastern Russia
Power of Siberia Russia-China Pipeline Construction launched
Page 10
Czech Republic
Czech NET4GAS Increases Reverse-Flow Capacity for Central and
Eastern Europe
Page 11
Play Video
10
Contact
Gazprom
+7 495 719-10-77
[email protected]
Czech NET4GAS Increases Reverse-Flow Capacity for Central and Eastern Europe
NET4GAS will bolster capacities at the
Contact
Milan epka
NET4GAS, s.r.o.
+420 220 221 111
[email protected]
NEW
Laser
n
ha
et
LNG-Monitoring
Compressor Stations
Storage Areas
r
Lase
World Wide
Tel. +41 43 268 43 35 / www.pergam-suisse.ch
9/11/2014 12:49:53 PM
11
Contact
Melanie Kania
Baker Hughes
+1 713 439 8303
[email protected]
E
hib uro
iti pes
on
on Lea
Ne din
w gC
Pi on
pe fe
lin re
e T nc
ec e a
hn nd
olo
gie
s
Ex
Play Video
12
to Kakwa Pipeline).
tember 2, 2014.
Contact
Stay informed!
Pembina Pipeline Corporation Increases Capacity of Phase III Pipeline Expansion and Secures Additional Volumes
13
Contact
dividual joint.
Michael Beller
Rosen Group
+49-591-9136-7042
[email protected]
14
Play Video
Contact
Lindsey Benton
GE Oil & Gas
+ 281 921 5123
[email protected]
15
16
Contact
Chuck Harris
T.D. Williamson
[email protected]
advantages.
PDF Format.
Contact
Christian Wopen
Sputnik GmbH
+49 251 / 62 55 61-21
[email protected]
results and their documentation in reports can require much work as well as
time-consuming administration.
Esders GmbH has already smoothed
the way considerably in this regard
with their EBTM Esders Bluetooth Module which enables readout of test data
and direct transmission from the survey
site. With their new cloud technology,
Esders goes a step further. Esders LIVE
17
Play Video
MagneScan capabilities
keep expanding
The latest MagneScan in-line inspection tools continue to impress after more than four years in operation. This fourth
generation MFL technology from PII is shorter, lighter and more flexible than ever before, and deliver a higher level
of data quality. The size range is now extended up to 36 inches with enhanced variable gas bypass capability in the
larger diameters to enable full inspection of high-speed gas pipelines with no loss of production.
MagneScan combines multiple inspections in a single run. The foundation MFL inspection is complemented by a
fully integrated high-resolution caliper and a GIS mapping unit as a standard option for improved data alignment.
The corrosion detection capability is 5% of wall thickness at 90% POD, while depth-sizing accuracy is 10% at 90%
certainty at tool speeds up to 5 m/s.
To complement the multi-mission hardware capability, PII has developed software for flexible processing, analysis
and reporting. Analysts and pipeline operators can see all data sets aligned together in the latest version of the client
viewing software. Similarly, the new single integrated report covers all data sets and can include integrity engineering
recommendations if requested. The result is a fast reporting interval with a fully integrated inspection and integrity
assessment to facilitate timely planning.
Performance
Introduction
Geographically, by involving the countries having important
gy resources (oil & gas), which attracts all major energy play-
major players.
Caspian Region
Russia, Azerbaijan, Iran, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, India, China & EU can be accepted
as the main important players in
the energy struggle in Caspian
Region.
the region. US & Japan are the other important energy play-
ers which are also active in Caspian Region with their private
20
Note that: Due to very few activities and interests in the re-
Canada, Australia, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, South Korea etc. are not
billion $
%
30
1728
265
-1463
0.021
Supply
1.3
19.7
9.5
-10.2
0.015
Supply
231.3
0.30
Dependent
Russia
Iran
Kazakhstan
Uzbekistan
0.6
68
82
14
0.041
x
1.1
56.9
47.9
-9
0.052
Supply
104.7
0.21
Dependent
157
87.2
3680
10643
1971
3174
-1709
2758
0.008
0.056
Supply
Demand
33.6
1.3
160.5
40.2
156.1
54.6
-4.4
14.4
0.005
0.031
Supply
Demand
997.4
4784
0.19
0.01
Dependent Dependent
EU
tcm
bcma
bcma
bcma
7
0.6
872
222
93
100
-779
-122
0.045
0.133
Supply
Supply
0.9
17.5
15.6
64.4
8.5
23.3
-7.1
-41.1
0.017
0.004
Supply
Supply
98
47.5
0.38
0.64
Dependent Dependent
China
billion bbl
m bbld
m bbld
m bbld
India
Turkmenistan
Azerbaijan
5.7
894
3652
2758
0.056
Demand
1.3
40.2
54.6
14.4
0.031
Demand
4784
0.01
x
17.3
4155
10581
6426
0.086
Demand
3.1
107.2
146.6
39.4
0.035
Demand
12380
0.02
x
7.9
1762
12700
10938
0.080
Demand
1.9
153
456
303
0.081
Demand
15630
0.01
x
Table 1: Table1: Energy Statistics of the Main Energy Players in Caspian Region
Research / Development / Technology
21
in the table1 above. The table below shows the future gas
OECD
North America
United States
Europe
Pacific
Japan
Non-OECD
E. Europe / Eurasia
Russia
Asia
China
India
Middle East
Africa
Latin America
Brazil
World
European Union
2008
2015
2020
2025
2030
1.541
815
662
555
170
100
1.608
701
453
341
85
42
335
1000
131
25
3.149
536
1.615
841
661
574
200
118
2.070
755
474
576
247
81
428
139
172
48
3.685
553
1.691
872
668
608
210
122
2.328
786
487
715
335
104
470
154
203
66
4.019
587
1.773
924
700
636
213
123
2.611
824
504
864
430
134
536
164
224
76
4.384
609
1.865
986
741
653
226
127
2.912
857
522
1049
535
176
592
170
245
88
4.478
621
The figure below shows the changes in oil import values of the biggest consumers in 2035. Again from the figure below, the huge increase expectations in Indias and Chinas oil exports in 2035 in contrast to the decrease in EU, US and Japan is observed.
22
mature fields). For gas export potentials; all the players will
increase their supplies.
Oil (bbld)
Gas (bcma)
Azerbaijan
250.000
40
Turkmenistan
250.000
140
Uzbekistan
80
Kazakhstan
2.100.000
60
Iran
No Estimations
Due To Sanctions
Russia
6.000.000
350
demanded resources.
region:
Azerbaijan
Due to existing & planned pipeline projects and geopolitical conditions Azerbaijan becomes the energy gate of Caspian
Energy Resources to Europe (Although it is more economical to transport some energy resources in Caspian Region
to Europe through Iran or Russia, due to EU & US strategies, Azerbaijan is the unique political choice.) New resource
potentials are mainly gas and all are usually deep offshore. (Means: not easy to develop.) International huge oil companies
are interested for investment
Main energy security targets are:
To develop new offshore gas field with the foreign investors and to gain access to European gas markets via the planned pipelines
To be an important gas supplier for EU and by this way get EUs & USs political supports
To continue to securely access existing markets: for gas - to Turkey and Georgia; for oil - to Ceyhan, Supsa & Novorossiysk
To get more production with new investments and development plans from the most important oil field ACG
To have more control over the existing and future projects in Azerbaijan
To construct more offshore drilling platforms for continuous development activities in Caspian Sea
To reach gas export capacity of 50 bcma in 2035
To solve conflicting claims over the maritime and seabed boundaries of Caspian Sea with Iran & Turkmenistan
To be an energy hub in the coming 30 years by transporting Turkmenistan and Kazakhstan oil & gas resources
To construct the regions biggest refinery and become an important oil products supplier in the region
To construct gas power plants and become an electric supplier in the region
23
Turkmenistan
Uzbekistan
gas exporting capacity more than 9 bcma.
Lack of sufficient foreign investment
Locating too far from the important markets and land locked in all sides
Lack of sufficient export pipeline infrastructure
Majority of gas is exported to Russia and some portion of gas is exported to China and Iran
Important portion of gas reservoirs are high pressure and temperature reservoirs and have high
percentages of H2S and CO2; means not easy to develop due to economical & technical aspects
Due to important gas reserves, having attraction of all other players in the region
Main energy security targets are:
To get attraction of new foreign investors and develop more oil and gas fields.
To continue to securely access to Russia, Kazakhstan & Kyrgyzstan gas markets
To increase the capacity of transportation to access Russia gas markets
To access to China gas markets via Central Asia-China Pipeline after capacity extension
To reach gas export capacity of 80 bcma in 2035
In the short term; increase gas to liquid converting processes to reduce oil importing
To explore and develop possible oil shale reserves
To construct new facilities to decrease flaring of associated gas and increase usage (Today nearly 2 bcma gas is flared)
24
Kazakhstan
Iran
Iran holds the worlds largest proven gas reserves and worlds fourth largest proven oil reserves..
Iran is a very important oil & gas exporter in the region and is a member of OPEC:
oil exporting capacity more than 1,7 million bbld.
gas exporting capacity more than 10 bcma. (Only Turkey is importing gas from Iran.)
Holds the Strait of Hormuz; which is an important route for oil exports of Persian Gulf Countries.
International sanctions negatively affected all parts of the oil and gas market in Iran including; the export & import
movements, development of new fields, new transportation projects, foreign investments and etc. (For example: In
spite of the above oil export capacity, today Iran can export less than 800 000 bbld)
If Iran cannot find a peaceful solution to stop the sanctions and change all scenarios, then the main energy
security targets can be:
Access to existing oil markets which are %50 China & India, %20 Japan & N. Korea and %20 Turkey & Spain & Italy & Greece
Find some back-doors to perforate the sanctions. Such as:
- More swap agreements in oil & gas trade movements
- To increase the swap capacity; making investments in anti US & EU countries
Prepare suitable legal legislations for foreign investors to make investment in development projects in Iran
Develop shared reservoirs as specially; South Pars Field.
- By developing gas fields, export the gas as LNG by constructing relevant facilities
- Make agreements with Turkey to sell extra gas, develop the transportation capacities and make Turkey to construct an LNG facility
if needed
- Make suitable agreements with Pakistan for gas export
25
Russia
Russia holds the worlds second largest proven gas reserves and worlds ninth largest proven oil reserves
oil exporting capacity more than 7,4 million bbld.
gas exporting capacity more than 175 bcma.
Russia EUs largest energy resources importer (2009)
36% of the EUs total gas imports originate from Russia
31% of the EUs total crude oil imports originate from Russia
30% of the EUs coal imports originate from Russia
The EU Russias largest trade partner for energy goods5
80% of all Russian oil exports go to the EU
70% of all Russian gas exports go to the EU
50% of all Russian coal exports go to the EU
Most part of Russian sector of the Caspian Sea are unexplored and undeveloped
but may hold large hydrocarbon reserves
Most important oil producing fields in Russia are mature and having a declining production trend
Russia has an extensive domestic and export pipeline network.
To reach gas export capacity of 230 bcma in 2035 (expected to be more than 140 bcma)
To reach oil export capacity over 1 million bbld in 2035 (expected to be more than 250 000 bbld
(due to expected increasing condensate production; but new infrastructures to transport will be needed)
To complete East-West pipeline inside Turkmenistan and have the ability to transport South East resources to the Caspian Sea markets
(Then from Trans Caspian to EU (also seems uneconomic))
To solve conflicting claims over the maritime and seabed boundaries of Caspian Sea with Iran & Azerbaijan
26
India
India is the fourth largest energy consumer in the world after US, China and Russia
oil importing capacity more than 2,7 million bbld.
gas importing capacity more than 14 bcma.
Most of the oil imports are supplied from Middle East Countries (%64)
and only lower than %64 rate is coming from Iran.
All natural gas demands are met by (usually long term) LNG imports and the
internal gas production. (In 2011 India was the 6th largest LNG importer in the world)
There is an important incremental rate in oil and gas demand for India.
Also India is an important oil importer, due to the refinery capacity; she is a net exporter of petroleum products
Up to 2.6 tcm unconventional gas resources (coalbed methane) potential is estimated to exist in onshore and
offshore India
China
China is the worlds most populous country and the largest energy consumer in the world. Rapidly increasing
energy demand has made China extremely influential in world energy markets.
oil importing capacity more than 6,4 million bbld.
gas importing capacity more than 40 bcma
Most of the oil imports are supplied from Middle East Countries (%50) and from Caspian suppliers; %10 from Iran,
%7 from Russia, %4 from Kazakhstan.
There is an important incremental rate in oil and gas demand for China.
Up to 10 tcm unconventional gas resources (coalbed methane) potential is estimated to exist in prospects
27
European Union
28
From
Through
To (Markets)
Capacity
(bcma)
SCP
GAZI-MAGOMED-MAZDOK
BAKU-ASTARA
Azerbaijan
Azerbaijan
Azerbaijan
AZ-GEO
AZ-RUS
AZ-IRAN
Turkey
Russia
Malcjcovam
8
1
0,5
Future
SCPX
TANAP
TAP
IAP
Azerbaijan
Georgia
Turkey
Albania
AZ-Geo
Turkey
Gre-Alb
Mont-Bosn
Turkey-EU
EU
Italy
Balkans
16
16
10
5
Existing
CAC
KORPEZHE KK
DAULETABAT-KANGIRAN
CENTRAL ASIA-CHINA
BUKHARA-URALS
Turkmenistan
Turkmenistan
Turkmenistan
Turkmenistan
Turkmenistan
Turk-Uzb-Kaz
Turk
Turk
Turk-Uzb-Kaz
Turk-Uzb-Kaz
Russia
Iran
Iran
China
Russia
100
13
6
40
20
Future
EAST-WEST
TAPI
TRANSCASPIAN
CENTRAL ASIA-CHINA X
Turkmenistan
Turkmenistan
Turkmenistan
Uzbekistan
Turk
Turk-Afg-Pak
Az
Uzb
Caspian
India
Turkey-EU
China
30
34
30
+18
Existing
CAC
BUKHARA-URALS
TASHKENT-BISK-ALMATI
Turkmenistan
Turkmenistan
Uzbekistan
Turk-Uzb
Turk-Uzb-Kaz
Uzb-Krg
CACX
CENTRAL-ASIA-CHINA X
Uzbekistan
Uzbekistan
Uzb
Uzb
Russia
China
+30
+10
From
BTC
WREP
NREP
Railway
Azerbaijan
Azerbaijan
Azerbaijan
Azerbaijan
Existing
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
Rus
Kaz
Kaz
Kaz
World
China
Caspian
Russia
0,7
0,24
0,34
0,6
BUKHARA-URALS
CAC
CENTRAL-ASIA_CHINA
Turkmenistan
Turkmenistan
Turkmenistan
Turk-Uzb-Kaz
Turk-Uzb-Kaz
Turk-Uzb-Kaz
Russia
Russia
China
20
100
40
ESKENE-AKTAU
KAZAK-CHINA X
TRANSCASPIAN
KAZAK-TURKMEN-IRAN
CPC X
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
Kaz
Kaz
Kaz
Kaz-Turk
Rus
Caspian
China
World
Iran
World
0,76
0,16
x
x
+0,7
KAZAK-CHINA
Kazakhstan
Kaz
China
KORPEZHE KK
DAULETABAT-KANGIRAN
IRAN-Turkey
Turkmenistan
Turkmenistan
Iran
Turk
Turk
IR
Iran
Iran
Turkey
13
6
14
IRAN-PAKISTAN
IRAN-IRAQ-SYRIA
Iran
Iran
IR
IR-IRQ-SYR
Pakistan
World
28
x
YAMAL1
YAMAL2
BLUE STREAM
NORTH CAUCASUS
ORENBURG-WESTERN BORDER
URENGOY-UZHGOROD
YAMBURG-WESTERN BORDER
DOLINA UZHGOROD
KOMARNO-DROZDOWICHI
UZHGOROD-BEREGOVO
HUST-SATU-MARE
Russia
Russia
Russia
Russia
Russia
Russia
Russia
Russia
Russia
Russia
Russia
Bel
Bel
Rus
Geo
Ukr
Ukr
Ukr
Ukr
Bel
Ukr
Ukr
EU
EU
Turkey
Armenia
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
28,5
28,5
16
10
26
28
28
20
5
11
2
Russia
Ukr
EU
24
KOBRIN-BREST
ST. PETERSBURG-FINLAND
Russia
Russia
Bel
Rus
EU
EU
5
7
SOUTH STREAM
ALTAI
RUSSIA-CHINA 1&2
Russia
Russia
Russia
Rus
Rus
Rus
Eu
China
China
63
30
80
Exiting
CPC
KAZAK-CHINA
RAILWAY
UZEn-ATYRAU-SAMARA
Future
Future
Existing
Name of Pipeline
Name of Pipeline
Russia
Russia
Russia
Russia
Bel-Ukr-Eu
Rus
Bel
Rus
Future
Existing
DRUZHBA
BALTIC
NORTH-WESTERN
ESPO
Russia
Gas
To
Capacity
Through (Markets (million
)
bbld)
AZ-GEO-TR World
1,2
AZ-GEO
World
0,15
AZ-RUS
World
0,3
AZ-GEO
World
0,22
Future
Iran
Kazakhstan
Uzbekistan
Turkmenistan
Azerbaijan
Oil
EU
World
EU
Pacific
2
2,1
0,3
0,6
29
Oil
Through
Name of Pipeline
From
Through
To (Markets)
Capacity
(bcma)
TAPI
Turkmenistan
Turk-Afg-Pak
India
34
IPI
Iran
Pak
India
Future
From
Future
KAZAK-CHINA
Kazakhstan
Kaz
China
0,24
CENTRAL ASIA-CHINA
Turkmenistan
Turk-Uzb
China
40
KAZAK-CHINA X
MYANMAR-CHINA
Kazakhstan
Myanmar
Kaz
Myn
China
China
+0,16
0,48
CENTRAL ASIA-CHINA X
KAZAK-CHINA
RUSSIA-CHINA 1&2
MYANMAR-CHINA
Uzbekistan
Kazakhstan
Russia
Myanmar
Uzb
Kaz
Rus
Myn
China
China
China
China
+10+18
x
80
12
DRUZHBA
NORT-WESTERN
Russia
Russia
Bel-Ukr-Eu
Bel
EU
EU
2
0,3
YAMAL 1
YAMAL 2
BLUE STREAM
NORTH CAUCASUS
ORENBURG-WESTERN-BORDER
URENGOY-UZHGOROD
YAMBURG-WESTERN BORDER
DOLINA-UZHGOROD
KOMARNO-DROZDOWICHI
UZHGOROD-BEREGOVO
HUST-SATU-MARE
Russia
Russia
Russia
Russia
Russia
Russia
Russia
Russia
Russia
Russia
Russia
Bel
Bel
Rus
Geo
Ukr
Ukr
Ukr
Ukr
Bel
Ukr
Ukr
EU
EU
Turkey
Armenia
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
28,5
28,5
16
10
26
28
28
20
5
11
2
Russia
Ukr
EU
24
KOBRIn-BREST
ST. PETERSBURG-FINLAND
MAGHREB
MEGDAZ
GALSI
TRANS-MEDITERRANEAN
GREENSTREAM
Russia
Russia
Algeria
Algeria
Algeria
Algeria
Libya
Bel
Rus
Mor
Alg
Alg
Tun
Lib
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
EU
5
7
12
8
10
30
11
TANAP
TAP
IAP
SOUTH STREAM
NABUCCO WEST
Georgia
Turkey
Albania
Russia
Turkey
Turkey
Gre-Alb
Mont-Bosn
Rus
EU
EU
Italy
Balkans
EU
EU
16
10
5
63
20
Future
EU
Existing
China
Existing
India
Name of Pipeline
Gas
To
Capacity
(Markets (million
)
bbld)
Table 4: Caspian Energy Players and existing & future pipeline capacities
To check all the players 2035 extra supply and demand potentials on the figures 2 & 3 below
(2035 value todays value)
30
Figure 3: 2035 Extra Oil Supplies and Demands (unit million bbl/d)
In 2035:
EU does not need extra oil supply so; main item for EU energy security is gas.
China and India need very important amount of oil supply and they will not meet their demand only from the
Caspian Region. Moreover, oil supply in the Caspian region will decrease (as 1,2 million bbl/d) in spite of the
expected production increase in Kazakhstan. (By considering there will not be a solution in sanctions on Iran. If a
solution to the sanctions can be found, Iran will change all the oil supply potential in the region. Otherwise, India
and China will have to find oil supplies from Middle East-North America or Africa)
From this view, meeting both oil and gas demands are the most important energy security issues for India & China
There is totally 428 bcma extra gas supply in Caspian Region players and 895 bcma extra demand. This means
struggle in gas demand security will be deepened.
For logical analysis of this struggle also some other items have to be considered such as:
etc.
prices
Projects
- Iran and Sanctions
31
supplies from Turkmenistan &Uzbekistan. For China; always there will be a possibility to have more gas from
considered in analysis.
After checking the future available transportation capacities
of pipelines in the region (as assuming future pipeline constructions will successfully be completed), the map below is
prepared, which is showing each suppliers transport capacity available in 2035.
EU also will not have enough transportation capacities in 2035. New LNG
projects, Azerbaijan North Africa and
Eastern Mediterranean gas resources
will be important for EUs gas security
future.
Russia will have huge amount of extra supply transportation capacity and to EU (Assume South Stream with 63
bcma will be agreed with EU and completed). However,
it will be better for Russia to agree with China, develop
new transportation facilities and export her gas to huge
demander southern neighbor (Also todays sanctions
and political problems have to be taken into consider-
ation) to export.
32
Summary
China.
Author
Ouzhan Akyener
TPAO Azerbaijan
AZ 1005
Baku/Azerbaijan
[email protected]
www.tpao.gov.tr/eng/
33
Pipelines are by far one of the most efficient and safe meth-
34
Method 1
There are two methods of applying concrete layer on the
pipe surface.
1. First is the Casting method where the wire sheet
fabric is rolled around the pipe. Then the complete
arrangement is enclosed in a Formwork / Mold with
openings on the top. Concrete is poured from the top
and is vibrated using specialized machines.
2. The second method is impinging, where concrete is
projected at a very high velocity on the external surface
of the pipe containing the wire roll fabric.
Method 2
Cement Replacement
Indian Standards IS 1910 on concrete lining and coating pre-
35
that can be used are iron-rich by-products from metal recovery operations, such as smelters, Waelz kilns or plasma
original heavy iron ore actually used for countering the pipe
buoyancy.
Conclusion
Author
Mohit Jain
Aggregate Replacement
Limited (GITL),
Sector -26,
Gandhinagar - 382 028
Gujarat, India
[email protected]
36
Play Video
COMPLEX
PIPELINE
INSPECTIONS.
SOLVED.
www.QuestIntegrity.com
A TEAM Industrial Services Company
Abstract
dominant type of mainline pipe coatings. These coating decisions are generally based on the operator- or engineering
Coatings of pipelines
company preferences, but follow as well the pipeline construction requirements and operating conditions. Not to for-
38
remaining interface. This ensures a completely sealed, impermeable, and sleeve-type coating.
(140F).
very few cases of bad experience with tape coatings are due
to the fact that only a two-ply tape was used as the corrosion
39
Figure 2: By using 2-ply tapes for the inner wrap, the chances of spiral corrosion occurring on the steel substrate are significantly higher. This effect can be avoided by using co-extruded 3-ply tape technology
Co-extruded three-ply tapes should be used as a one-tape
excellent
40
at STEGAL Pipeline
thickness of 342 microns. The tape system used for the STE-
mately 3.2 mm, although the thickness can range from 3.44
mm to 3.62 mm.
41
30-20 (0.5 mm thick single tape) and the strong and flexible
tem with two layers of each (to a total thickness of 2.0 mm),
the stress-class B50 according to EN 12068 is passed. It is a
very cost efficient system, which has a true corrosion- prevention function (no spiral corrosion, compared to available
two-ply tape systems) and outstanding tape characteristics
(elongation at break).
Author
Figure 5: Application of Inner Wrap DENSOLEN AS 50 with
manual wrapping device DENSOMAT KGR
Michael Schad
DENSO GmbH
Leverkusen
Germany
[email protected]
www.denso.de
42
Trusted Partnership
For four generations, companies around the world have trusted
TDWs unwavering commitment to pipeline performance.
So can you.
+32 67 28 36 11
+65 6364 8520
+1 832 448 7200
TDWilliamson.com
Registered trademark of T.D. Williamson, Inc. in the United States and in other countries. Trademark of T.D. Williamson, Inc. in the United States and in other countries. Copyright 2014 All rights reserved. T.D. Williamson, Inc.
43
Abstract
Transporting waxy / high pour point crude oil above its pour
For crude oils with 6.5, 12.5 and 20%wt wax, PPTs of 20C,
crude oil samples with PPT up to 32C, while for a new pipe-
cooling cycles or
of up to 65C may therefore throughout represent a realistic scenario e.g. when planning to export waxy / high pour
markets by pipeline.
44
the environment.
Pipeline Systems
2.1.2 Disadvantages
The major disadvantages of heating the oil only in pump /
heating stations can be characterized as follows:
45
generating heat in the tube near its inner surface due to the
46
environment.
the reliability of the heating system; additionally the electromagnetic impact of high-voltage overhead lines installed in
2.2.2 Disadvantages
ages therein.
Heating System
Heater-Station
Heated System
Electrically Trace
Heated System
Advantages
Common heating method
Disadvantages
Increased heat losses due to increased oil temperature near pipeline section inlet
Table 1: Advantages and Disadvantages of Heater-Station Heated and Electrically Trace Heated Pipeline Systems
47
5. The CHP Stations are designed such (preferentially by installation of two CHP units in parallel per station) that during
3.1 General
lows:
Stations.
ed by polyethylene or
48
tion of many independent CHP Stations and partial redundancy in CHP Stations by parallel units.
standardized equipment.
49
ped with two equally designed CHP units installed in parallel and connected via an inlet- and an outlet header to the
power (CHP) stations for long waxy / high pour point crude
erator unit provided with fuel via a parallel fuel supply line is
cal energy.
Unit No. 1
Ambient Air
Fuel Medium
Unit
Gas Turbine
El. Power
Generator
Discharge Header
Suction Header
Trace-Heating System
Line Valve
50
small (e.g. <=4 for a 24 crude oil pipeline system). After re-
injection of the heated side stream into the main crude oil
the friction heating effect depends considerably (roughly with 3rd power) on the crude oil flow rate, and reduces
ative flow rate reduction from 100% to 80% (50%), the heat
valves at the sites of the CHP heating stations. It is estimated that depending on the project, the efficiency of pipeline
flow rate may still be considerably less than the design flow
heating solutions.
51
pipeline systems and compares heater-station heated pipeline systems with electrically trace heated pipeline systems.
for pumps) can be used for crude oil heating via main
ment.
Summary
Author
Klaus-Dieter Kaufmann
Werner-Eckert-Str. 7
D - 81829 Munich
Germany
Tel. +49 89 25 55 94 - 502
[email protected]
52
www.ilf.com
ENGINEERING EXCELLENCE
1. Introduction
1.1 Background
the liner through the flowline stalks and joining the stalks
from a North Sea asset, where polymer liner at two spot loca-
54
through the riser and splits at the manifold, where each flowline transports it to an individual drill centre.
data for the two flowlines where the liner anomalies were
Super Duplex, and the flowlines are API 5L X60 carbon steel
55
Parameter
Flowline A
Flowline B
273.1
273.1
15.8
15.9
Manufacturing tolerance, %
10
10
Design factor
0.72
0.72
MAOP (barg)
197
197
413
413
517
517
10 (MDPE)
10 (MDPE)
9.3
9.3
56
The flowline B was installed in 2005 to replace one of the existing flowlines. Due to a leak at the FTA a new section (approximately 500 m) complete with FTA had to be installed
at the drill centre end. This required cutting 500 m section
off the already installed pipeline at the drill centre end and
recovery of the flowline end to the deck for a tie-in welding.
Following this the liner within the drill centre section was
noted to be damaged (blistering and plastic deformation of
the liner over a localised area below the compression ring) as
shown in Figure 3b, presumably due to overheating during
the subsea cutting (diamond wire saw was used).
2. Integrity Management
2.1 Inspection Method and Requirements
Considering what was mentioned above, as of end of 2008,
there were two locations where the polymer liner was known
to be damaged creating increasing risk of failure due to internal corrosion. Inspection of these locations was required
to confirm the extent of corrosion and any further liner regression at the location on the flowline A and to establish if
any corrosion had occurred behind the blistered liner at the
location on the flowline B. It was acknowledged that, due
tool sits on top of the pipe. This requires some space underneath and, therefore, dredging of the areas around the inspection locations was required. This was carried out using
the 6 inch ROV dredger. Furthermore, external (polypropylene) coating had to be removed at the inspection locations
to identify the limits of the WeldLink connectors and facilitate the UT measurements. This was carried out using the
Proservs Pipeline Coating Removal tool (see Figure 4b). It
should be noted here that a CP system assessment was undertaken prior to the coating removal to confirm that the
bare pipe sections would have sufficient protection from external corrosion to the end of field life.
57
flowline B (Figure 7). The highest wall loss figure obtained for
carbon steel, which is Inconel 625 clad from the weld on the
directly onto the FTA, while a pup piece (cut to length at site)
mm. The wall loss figures were consistent with the fact that
the flowline A had been in service for longer and had more
server liner damage. The built-in corrosion allowance was
2.2 Inspection No 1
consumed, but the remaining wall thicknesses at both locations were above the minimum allowable wall thicknesses
58
calised corrosion. The fact that the deepest pits were found
The highest wall loss figure obtained for the damaged lin-
11.45 mm. For the location on the flowline A the area of the
deepest pit was found at a different location, compared with
2.3 Inspection No 2
thickness for the hoop stress (9.3 mm, see Table 1), indicating
59
tion and wall loss was identified for both locations. For the
And for the location on the flowline B the highest wall loss
steel welds (see Figures 5a and 5b) were also inspected using
Figure 6: Corrosion maps from Inspection 1 (top picture) and Inspection 2 (bottom picture) for the Flowline A
60
Figure 7: Corrosion maps from Inspection 1 (top picture) and Inspection 2 (bottom picture) for the Flowline B
61
Figure 8: Corrosion maps for the verification locations scanned during Inspection 2 on the flowline A
(top picture) and flowline C (bottom picture)
62
assumed that a uniform wall loss rate would occur going for-
2 assessment for the location with the deepest defect improved by approximately 0.6 years (7 months).
Flowlines
Minimum allowable
wall thickness at
MAOP, mm
Level 1 Assessment
A
241
7.39
1.66
0.9
306
6.98
4.33
2.2
Level 2 Assessment
A
246
6.11
2.94
1.5
312
6.10
5.21
2.7
The wall loss rates used for estimating the remaining service
summer 2013.
63
any liner damage may not be detected if the period between the
installation or remedial works
and inspection is too short.
Authors
Damir Tadjiev
Mark Murray
Bryce Stewart
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
64
STATS GROUP
Play Video
STATS partner with major operators in the development and support of Emergency Pipeline Repair
Isolation Systems to minimise the downtime of damaged subsea pipelines. STATS provide rapid response,
reducing environmental and commercial impact and enabling early resumption of production.
www.statsgroup.com
65
1. Introduction
formations to the overlying pipeline, and consequently additional pipeline strain. The current paper aims to illustrate
66
areas is the potential slope instabilities under static and seismic conditions. It is evident that in such areas various slope
related to the earthquake, since it destroyed many residential buildings and caused many fatalities (Sassa et al. 1996).
Figure 1(c):
Rock-slope /failure
on Lefkada
islandTechnology Journal - September 2014
Research
/ Development
Technology
Pipeline
67
As shown in the sketch of Figure 3, the potential instabilities of a slope under static (and
seismic conditions) are expected to impose
permanent ground deformations to a pipeline
crossing the unstable area, causing thus additional pipeline distress. This distress may cause
unacceptable strains due to compression,
tension, and bending or even pipeline failure
depending on the circumstances. Note that
rockfalls is a special case of rock slope instability that does not impose permanent ground
deformations to the pipeline. In the case of an
above ground pipeline, the impact of a rockfall with large-volume rock boulders on the
pipeline is evident, while in the case of a buried pipeline, the rock boulders may damage
the pipeline either by penetration through the
backfill material or by excessive impact stress,
depending on the burial depth
68
eas it is shown that, apart from engineering judgment, reliable data and advanced modeling are required in order to
basis.
not satisfied).
for the proper design of onshore high-pressure gas pipelines. In the first part of the paper, after a brief overview of the concepts
of limit-equilibrium and pseudo-static acceleration, the available analytical and nu-
instability.
69
F
S
ST
T
=
N
(W cos ) tan + c
W sin
H
sin
(2)
F
S
ST
tan
2c sin
+
tan sin( ) sin
(3)
forces.
1
sin( )
)
W = 2 (
2
sin sin
where
: the unit weight of the geomaterial
H: the height of the slope
: the angle of the slope
: the angle of failure ( < )
70
(1)
Seismic conditions
parameters. It is noted that the cause of this reduction is usually related to pore-pressure increase and soil-liquefaction
phenomena.
71
constitutive models).
vertical motion.
72
F
S
PS
F
S
ST
a
tan ( h v )
tan
h
+ v +1
tan
(4)
F
S
PS
F
S
ST
tan ( h )
h
+1
tan
(5)
eration.
73
constitutive models).
vertical motion.
Ac/Amax
Menu (5):
2.53
Ac
Ac
Amax
1.09
+ 00.30p
.30 p
0
p=
2.32
74
for
for50 %
50
%
probability of exceedance.
for1%1%
for
sidered unstable.
deformation.
3. Soil-Pipeline Interaction
many patterns of permanent ground deformation which depend on the local geological / geotechnical conditions. As
slope movements:
75
Modern guidelines for the evaluation of seismic induced landslides, like the guidelines of California
Geological Survey (CGS, 2008) for evaluating and
mitigating seismic hazards, propose the dependence of the seismic coefficient on the peak ground
acceleration at the bedrock, the distance from the
seismic source and the acceptable seismic displacements. The following figure shows the resistant and
driving forces (or moments) for a stability analysis of
Figure 8: Pipeline distress due to permanent ground
deformations caused by slope instability: (a) pipeline
crossing parallel to the direction of slope movement, (b)
pipeline crossing perpendicular to the direction of slope
movement.
constitutive models).
that this specific approach is similar for all the rest cases of
76
Figure 9: The four springs around the pipeline representing the soil compliance.
Typically, the soil compliance around the pipeline is usually
soil springs, (c) vertical uplift soil springs, and (d) vertical
77
e
e
l. Th
Not
ode
m
ed.
t
n
r
n
al
e
e
rtic
disc
lem
e
e
v
e
r
ga
eam
ne a
usin
peli
ne b
on.
i
d
i
l
p
e
e
ecti
lat
ip
r
he
i
t
u
p
d
d
a
m
si
of
un
ial)
was
-up
l (ax
l aro
t
i
e
a
i
t
s
o
s
s
n
o
a
l
izo
the
ble
2: C
hor
ing
visi
re 1
e
t
t
u
a
h
l
o
t
g
Fi
in
is n
imu
ugh
gs s
ring
o
n
p
i
h
r
s
t
sp
ng
xial
acti
he a
t
g
t
n
i
tha
spr
ted
n
e
i
or
ty) is assigned at the fixed ends of the soil springs along the
en into account.
sliding mass. Since the analysis is static, the damping and inertia effect can be ignored.
78
suming that the pipe is fully operational (i.e. internal pressure and temperature difference). That means that the calculated maximum axial strain is attributed not only to the slope
instability, but to the operational loads as well.
In the case of shell-elements, the stress and strain concentrations are captured in a more accurate way. The total length
of the model should extensively cover the unstable area.
Similarly to the beam-model, the surrounding soil can also
be simulated with the bilinear springs described previously.
The pipeline section can be discretized along the periphery,
while springs are attached at all nodes in all directions. The
values of the springs are assumed to be a function of the
projected area of the cross section in the corresponding di-
the model.
Since the axial strains should be at an acceptable level, it becomes evident that if the calculated strains on the pipeline are
excessive, various mitigation measures should be adopted.
79
Figure 16: Deformed shape and contours of axial strains of a pipeline subjected to
permanent ground deformations.
4. Mitigation Measures
line to avoid the critical areas would be an option. However, since the pipeline relocation may be impractical or even
ment).
at the slopes, and (b) verify the pipeline against these defor-
mations.
80
lowing:
stabilization measures. The second is to change the characteristics of the pipeline either by increasing the pipe wall
ground deformations under seismic conditions, the minimization of the permanent ground deformations is directly
Figure 17: Flowchart showing the optimum procedure for the design of gas transmission projects (pipelines &
facilities) potentially subjected to permanent ground deformations.
81
(a) the ultimate limit state that implies structural failure, and
(b) the damage limit state that assures the structural integri-
pipeline strains.
EN 1998-4 proposes the following expression for the calculation of the design seismic action, AEd:
Regarding rockfalls (which is a special case of rock-slope instability), apart from the stabilization of the potentially un-
defined:
= 0.8
= 1.0
= 1.2
= 1.6
AEk
which is equal to 0.5 for important classes I and II, and equal
to 0.4 for classes III and IV. EN 1998-1, which defines the
seismic actions, recognizes that the seismic motion at the
5. Norm Provisions
layers over stiffer materials (ground type E), while in the case
of the two problematic ground types (S1 and S2) special am-
(6)
82
ST which should be applied near the top of cliffs. ST is defined in Annex A of EN1998-5 and ranges between 1.0 and
agS (7),
soil factor that depends on the ground type and the type of
from 1.0 in the case of rock up to 1.8 in the case of soft soil
Figure 18: The elastic response spectra proposed by EN 1998-1 for the five ground types (A, B, C, D, E) and the
two types of seismic action according to the magnitude MS.
83
irregularities.
84
FH = 0.5SW
6. Conclusions
Authors
Prodromos N. Psarropoulos
Andreas Antoniou
Geotechnical Engineer, PhD,
School of Civil Engineering,
NTUA, Greece
85
www.ndt-global.com
Canada | Germany | Malaysia | Mexico | Russia | Singapore | Spain | U.A.E | USA
e Journal
Designer / Layouter
Admir Celovic
Publisher
Euro Institute for Information and Technology Transfer GmbH
Am Listholze 82
30177 Hannover, Germany
Tel:
+49 (0)511 90992-10
Fax:
+49 (0)511 90992-69
URL:
www.eitep.de
Terms of publication
Twice a year, next issue: May 2015
Paper deadline: April 15th 2015
Advert Deadline: April 30th 2015
1
CO-EXTRUDED
3-PLY TAPE SYSTEMS
DENSOLEN AS30-20/R20MP
DENSOLEN AS50/R20HT
product
C 50
B 50
PAY ECONOMY
GET FIRST CLASS
STRONG &
FLEXIBLE
DENSO is the inventor of the PETROLATUM-Tape (DENSO-Tape) in the 1920s. Original DENSOLEN-Tapes
and Tape-Systems, DENSOLID-Polyurethane Coatings and DEKOTEC-Innovative Hotmelt and Mastic
Shrink-Sleeve Technology. Leader in Innovation since more than 90 years. Made in Germany.
Member of:
Certified by:
91
MEMBER OF
Certified
DINENISO9001
A Member of
DENSO Group
Germany
dekotec.net
www.DENSO.de
DENSO GmbH
Felderstrae 24
51371 Leverkusen | Germany
+49 214 2602-0
+49 214 2602-217
Pipeline Technology
Conference
2015
Pipeline
Technology
8-10 June 2010
Conference
Europes Leading Conference and Exhibition on New Pipeline Technologies
8-10 June 2015, Estrel Berlin, Berlin, Germany
88
89
90
Some impressions from the Pipeline Technology seminar in February 2014 in Dubai
Picture by Nepenthes 1
91
Kuwait
The Kuwait Towers - landmark and symbol of modern Kuwait
Picture by Lokantha 1
Picture by Ulrichulrich 1
92
www.infrastructuremiddleeast.com
Conferences / Seminars / Exhibitions Pipeline Technology Journal - September 2014
93
Pipeline Technology
Conference
2015
Pipeline
Technology
Conference
2010
8-10 June
2015
Europes Leading Conference and Exhibition on New
Pipeline Technologies, taking place at the Estrel Berlin,
Berlin, Germany
www.pipeline-conference.com
PTJ covers reports about research, industry and practice,
presentation of innovative concepts and technologies
abd special reports about pipeline safety.
ptj will be sent to more than 15.000 international decision
makers and experts of the pipeline industry.
Next Issue:
May 2015
www.pipeline-journal.com
www.pipeline-seminar.com
94
Pipeline Technolog
Conference 2010
Terms of publication
Twice a year, next issue: May 2015
Paper deadline: April 15th 2015
Advert Deadline: April 30th 2015
95