Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, Vol.

1, 2013

Another Form of Correlation Coefficient between Single

Valued Neutrosophic Sets and Its Multiple Attribute DecisionMaking Method
Jun Ye
Department of Electrical and Information Engineering, Shaoxing University, 508 Huancheng West Road, Shaoxing, Zhejiang 312000, P.R. China
E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract. A single valued neutrosophic set (SVNS),

which is the subclass of a neutrosophic set, can be
considered as a powerful tool to express the
indeterminate and inconsistent information in the process
of decision making. Then, correlation is one of the most
broadly applied indices in many fields and also an
important measure in data analysis and classification,
pattern recognition, decision making and so on.
Therefore, we propose another form of correlation
coefficient between SVNSs and establish a multiple

attribute decision making method using the correlation

coefficient of SVNSs under single valued neutrosophic
environment. Through the weighted correlation
coefficient between each alternative and the ideal
alternative, the ranking order of all alternatives can be
determined and the best alternative can be easily
identified as well. Finally, two illustrative examples are
employed to illustrate the actual applications of the
proposed decision-making approach.

Keywords: Correlation coefficient; Single valued neutrosophic set; Decision making.

1 Introduction
To handle the indeterminate information and
inconsistent information which exist commonly in real
situations, Smarandache [1] firstly presented a
neutrosophic set from philosophical point of view, which is
a powerful general formal framework and generalized the
concept of the classic set, fuzzy set, interval-valued fuzzy
set, intuitionistic fuzzy set, interval-valued intuitionistic
fuzzy set, paraconsistent set, dialetheist set, paradoxist set,
and tautological set [1, 2]. In the neutrosophic set, a truthmembership, an indeterminacy-membership, and a falsitymembership are represented independently. Its functions
TA(x), IA(x) and FA(x) are real standard or nonstandard
subsets of ]0, 1+[, i.e., TA(x): X ]0, 1+[, IA(x): X ]0,
1+[, and FA(x): X ]0, 1+[. Obviously, it will be difficult
to apply in real scientific and engineering areas. Therefore,
Wang et al. [3] proposed the concept of a single valued
neutrosophic set (SVNS), which is the subclass of a
neutrosophic set, and provided the set-theoretic operators
and various properties of SVNSs. Thus, SVNSs can be
applied in real scientific and engineering fields and give us
an additional possibility to represent uncertainty,
imprecise, incomplete, and inconsistent information which
exist in real world. However, the correlation coefficient is
one of the most frequently used tools in engineering
applications. Therefore, Hanafy et al. [4] introduced the
correlation of neutrosophic data. Then, Ye [5] presented

the correlation coefficient of SVNSs based on the

extension of the correlation coefficient of intuitionistic
fuzzy sets and proved that the cosine similarity measure of
SVNSs is a special case of the correlation coefficient of
SVNSs, and then applied it to single valued neutrosophic
multicriteria decision-making problems. Hanafy et al. [6]
presented the centroid-based correlation coefficient of
neutrosophic sets and investigated its properties.
Recently , S. Broumi and F. Smarandache [8] Correlation
coefficient of interval neutrosophic set and investigated its
properties.
In this paper, we propose another form of correlation
coefficient between SVNSs and investigate its properties.
Then, a multiple attribute decision-making method using
the correlation coefficient of SVNSs is established under
single valued neutrosophic environment. To do so, the rest
of the paper is organized as follows. Section 2 briefly
describes some concepts of SVNSs. In Section 3, we
develop another form of correlation coefficient between
SVNSs and investigate its properties. Section 4 establishes
a multiple attribute decision-making method using the
correlation coefficient of SVNSs under single valued
neutrosophic environment. In Section 5, two illustrative
examples are presented to demonstrate the applications of
the developed approach. Section 6 contains a conclusion
and future research.

Jun Ye, Another Form of Correlation Coefficient between Single Valued Neutrosophic Sets
and Its Multiple Attribute Decision-Making Method

Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, Vol. 1, 2013

2 Some concepts of SVNSs

Smarandache [1] firstly presented the concept of a
neutrosophic set from philosophical point of view and gave
the following definition of a neutrosophic set.
Definition 1 [1]. Let X be a space of points (objects), with
a generic element in X denoted by x. A neutrosophic set A
in X is characterized by a truth-membership function TA(x),
an indeterminacy-membership function IA(x), and a falsitymembership function FA(x). The functions TA(x), IA(x) and
FA(x) are real standard or nonstandard subsets of ]0, 1+[,
i.e., TA(x): X ]0, 1+[, IA(x): X ]0, 1+[, and FA(x): X
]0, 1+[. There is no restriction on the sum of TA(x),
IA(x) and FA(x), so 0 sup TA(x) + sup IA(x) + sup FA(x)
3+.
Obviously, it is difficult to apply in practical problems.
Therefore, Wang et al. [3] introduced the concept of a
SVNS, which is an instance of a neutrosophic set, to apply
in real scientific and engineering applications. In the
following, we introduce the definition of a SVNS [3].
Definition 2 [3]. Let X be a space of points (objects) with
generic elements in X denoted by x. A SVNS A in X is
characterized by a truth-membership function TA(x), an
indeterminacy-membership function IA(x), and a falsitymembership function FA(x) for each point x in X, TA(x),
IA(x), FA(x) [0, 1]. Thus, A SVNS A can be expressed as

A = { x, TA ( x), I A ( x), FA ( x) | x X }.

Ac = { x, FA ( x),1 I A ( x), TA ( x) | x X }.

Definition 4 [3]. A SVNS A is contained in the other

SVNS B, A B if and only if TA(x) TB(x), IA(x) IB(x),
and FA(x) FB(x) for every x in X.
Definition 5 [3]. Two SVNSs A and B are equal, written as
A = B, if and only if A B and B A.
3 Correlation coefficient of SVNSs
Motivated by another correlation coefficient between
intuitionistic fuzzy sets [7], this section proposes another
form of correlation coefficient between SVNSs as a
generalization of the correlation coefficient of intuitionistic
fuzzy sets [7].
Definition 6. For any two SVNSs A and B in the universe
of discourse X = {x1, x2,, xn}, another form of
correlation coefficient between two SVNSs A and B is
defined by
C ( A, B )
N ( A, B ) =
max{C ( A, A), C ( B, B )}
=

[T

i =1
n

[T

i =1

( xi ) TB ( xi ) + I A ( xi ) I B ( xi ) + FA ( xi ) FB ( xi )]

= TA ( x1 ) TB ( x1 ) + TA ( x2 ) TB ( x2 ) + ... + TA ( xn ) TB ( xn )
+ I A ( x1 ) I B ( x1 ) + I A ( x2 ) I B ( x2 ) + ... + I A ( xn ) I B ( xn )
+ FA ( x1 ) FB ( x1 ) + FA ( x2 ) FB ( x2 ) + ... + FA ( xn ) FB ( xn )

According to the CauchySchwarz inequality:

( x1 y1 + x2 y2 + ... + xn yn ) 2
( x12 + x22 + ... + xn2 ) ( y12 + y22 + ... + yn2 )

[( N ( A, B)]2 [TA2 ( xi ) + I A2 ( xn ) + FA2 ( xn )]

n

T ( xi ) + + I B2 ( xi ) + FB2 ( xi )
i =1

2
B

= N ( A, A) N ( B, B).
Thus, N ( A, B ) [N ( A, A)]1 / 2 [N ( B, B )]1 / 2 .
Then, N ( A, B ) max {N ( A, A), N ( B, B )}.
Therefore, N(A, B) 1.
(3) If A = B, there are TA(xi) = TB(xi), IA(xi) = IB(xi), and
FA(xi) = FB(xi) for any xi X and i = 1, 2, , n. Thus, there
are N(A, B) = 1.
In practical applications, the differences of importance
are considered in the elements in the universe. Therefore,
we need to take the weights of the elements xi (i = 1, 2,,
n) into account. Let wi be the weight for each element xi (i
= 1, 2,, n), wi [0, 1], and n wi = 1 , then we have the
i =1

following weighted correlation coefficient between the

SVNSs A and B:
W ( A, B ) =
n

w [T
i

i =1

( xi ) TB ( xi ) + I A ( xi ) I B ( xi ) + FA ( xi ) FB ( xi )]

n
n

max wi TA2 ( xi ) + I A2 ( xi ) + FA2 ( xi ) , wi TB2 ( xi ) + I B2 ( xi ) + FB2 ( xi )

i =1
i =1

(2)
T

( xi ) TB ( xi ) + I A ( xi ) I B ( xi ) + FA ( xi ) FB ( xi )]

] [

where (x1, x2, , xn) Rn and (y1, y2, , yn) Rn, we can
obtain

(1)

max TA2 ( xi ) + I A2 ( xi ) + FA2 ( xi ) , TB2 ( xi ) + I B2 ( xi ) + FB2 ( xi )

i =1
i=1

N ( A, B) =

i =1

Then, the sum of TA(x), IA(x) and FA(x) satisfies the

condition 0 TA(x) + IA(x) + FA(x) 3.
Definition 3 [3]. The complement of a SVNS A is denoted
by Ac and is defined as

Theorem 1. The correlation coefficient N(A, B) satisfies

the following properties:
(1) N(A, B) = N(B, A);
(2) 0 N(A, B) 1;
(3) N(A, B) = 1, if A = B.
Proof. (1) It is straightforward.
(2) The inequality N(A, B) 0 is obvious. Thus, we
only prove the inequality N(A, B) 1.

If w = (1/n, 1/n,, 1/n) , then Eq. (2) reduce to Eq.

(1). Note that W(A, B) also satisfy the three properties of
Theorem 1.

Jun Ye, Another Form of Correlation Coefficient between Single Valued Neutrosophic Sets
and Its Multiple Attribute Decision-Making Method

10

Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, Vol. 1, 2013

Theorem 2. Let wi be the weight for each element xi (i = 1,

n
2,, n), wi [0, 1], and wi = 1 , then the weighted
i =1

correlation coefficient W(A, B) defined in Eq. (2) also

satisfies the following properties:
(1) W(A, B) = W(B, A);
(2) 0 W(A, B) 1;
(3) W(A, B) = 1, if A = B.
Since the process to prove these properties is similar to
that in Theorem 1, we do not repeat it here.
4 Decision-making method using the correlation
coefficient of SVNSs

This section proposes a single valued neutrosophic

multiple attribute decision-making method using the
proposed correlation coefficient of SVNSs.
Let A = {A1, A2,, Am} be a set of alternatives and C =
{C1, C2,, Cn} be a set of attributes. Assume that the
weight of an attribute Cj (j = 1, 2,, n), entered by the
decision-maker, is wj, wj [0, 1] and n x j = 1 . In this
j =1

case, the characteristic of an alternative Ai (i = 1, 2,, m)

with respect to an attribute Cj (j = 1, 2,, n) is represented
by a SVNS form:
Ai = {C j , TAi (C j ), I Ai (C j ), FAi (C j ) | C j C , j = 1,2,..., n} ,

a*j = t *j , i*j , f j* = max(tij ), min(iij ), min( fij ) for j H,

i

while an ideal SVNV can be defined by an ideal element

for a cost attribute in the ideal alternative A* as
for j

a *j = t *j , i*j , f j* = min (tij ), max(iij ), max( f ij )

i

L.
Then, by applying Eq. (2) the weighted correlation
coefficient between an alternative Ai (i = 1, 2, , m) and
the ideal alternative A* is given by

w [t
n

W ( Ai , A ) =

ij

t *j + iij i *j + f ij f j*

j =1

[(

n
n
max w j tij2 + iij2 + f ij2 , w j t *j
j =1
j =1

) + (i ) + ( f ) ]
2

* 2
j

* 2
j

(3)
Then, the bigger the measure value W(Ai, A*) (i = 1, 2,
. . . , m) is, the better the alternative Ai is, because the
alternative Ai is close to the ideal alternative A*. Through
the weighted correlation coefficient between each
alternative and the ideal alternative, the ranking order of all
alternatives can be determined and the best one can be
easily identified as well.

where TA (C j ) , I A (C j ) , FA (C j ) [0, 1] and 0 TA (C j )

i
i
i
i

5 Illustrative examples

+ I A (C j ) + FA (C j ) 3 for Cj C, j = 1, 2, , n, and i =
i
1, 2, , m.
For convenience, the values of the three functions
TA (C j ) , I A (C j ) , FA (C j ) are denoted by a single valued

In this section, two illustrative examples for the

multiple attribute decision-making problems are provided
to demonstrate the application of the proposed decisionmaking method.

neutrosophic value (SVNV) aij = tij, iij, fij (i = 1, 2, , m;

j = 1, 2,, n), which is usually derived from the evaluation
of an alternative Ai with respect to an attribute Cj by the
expert or decision maker. Thus, we can establish a single
valued neutrosophic decision matrix D = (aij)mn:

D = (aij ) mn
t11 , i11 , f11

t ,i , f
= 21 21 21

t
,
i
m1 m1 , f m1

t12 , i12 , f12

t 22 , i22 , f 22

t m 2 , im 2 , f m 2

t1n , i1n , f1n

t 2 n , i2 n , f 2 n

t mn , imn , f mn

In the decision-making method, the concept of ideal

point has been used to help identify the best alternative in
the decision set. The ideal alternative provides a useful
theoretical construct against which to evaluate alternatives.
Generally, the evaluation attributes can be categorized into
two kinds, benefit attributes and cost attributes. Let H be a
collection of benefit attributes and L be a collection of cost
attributes. An ideal SVNV can be defined by an ideal
element for a benefit attribute in the ideal alternative A* as

5.1 Example 1

Now, we discuss the decision-making problem adapted

from the literature [5]. There is an investment company,
which wants to invest a sum of money in the best option.
There is a panel with four possible alternatives to invest
the money: (1) A1 is a car company; (2) A2 is a food
company; (3) A3 is a computer company; (4) A4 is an arms
company. The investment company must take a decision
according to the three attributes: (1) C1 is the risk; (2) C2 is
the growth; (3) C3 is the environmental impact, where C1
and C2 are benefit attributes and C3 is a cost attribute. The
weight vector of the three attributes is given by w = (0.35,
0.25, 0.4)T. The four possible alternatives are to be
evaluated under the above three attributes by the form of
SVNVs.
For the evaluation of an alternative Ai with respect to
an attribute Cj (i =1, 2, 3, 4; j =1, 2, 3), it is obtained from
the questionnaire of a domain expert. For example, when
we ask the opinion of an expert about an alternative A1
with respect to an attribute C1, he or she may say that the
possibility in which the statement is good is 0.4 and the
statement is poor is 0.3 and the degree in which he or she
is not sure is 0.2. For the neutrosophic notation, it can be
expressed as a11 = 0.4, 0.2, 0.3. Thus, when the four

Jun Ye, Another Form of Correlation Coefficient between Single Valued Neutrosophic Sets
and Its Multiple Attribute Decision-Making Method

11

Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, Vol. 1, 2013

possible alternatives with respect to the above three

attributes are evaluated by the expert, we can obtain the
following single valued neutrosophic decision matrix D:

D=

0.4,0.2,0.3
0.6,0.1,0.2
0.3,0.2,0.3

0.4,0.2,0.3
0.6,0.1,0.2
0.5,0.2,0.3

0.7,0.0,0.1

0.6,0.1,0.2

0.6,0.3,0.8

0.8,0.2,0.5
0.5,0.2,0.8
0.5,0.3,0.8

Then, we utilize the developed approach to obtain the

most desirable alternative(s).
From the single valued neutrosophic decision matrix,
we can obtain the following ideal alternative:

A* = {C1,0.7,0.1,0.1, C2 ,0.6,0.1,0.2, C3 ,0.5,0.3,0.8} .

By using Eq. (3), we can obtain the values of the
weighted correlation coefficient W(Ai, A*) (i =1, 2, 3, 4):
W(A1, A*) = 0.8016, W(A2, A*) = 0.9510, W(A3, A*) =
0.8588, and W(A4, A*) = 0.9664.
Thus, the ranking order of the four alternatives is A4
A2 A3 A1. Therefore, the alternative A4 is the best
choice among the four alternatives.
5.2 Example 2

A multi-criteria decision making problem is concerned

with a manufacturing company which wants to select the
best global supplier according to the core competencies of
suppliers. Now suppose that there are a set of four
suppliers A = {A1, A2, A3, A4} whose core competencies are
evaluated by means of the four attributes: (1) C1 is the
level of technology innovation; (2) C2 is the control ability
of flow; (3) C3 is the ability of management; (4) C4 is the
level of service, where C1, C2 and C2 are all benefit
attributes. Assume that the weight vector for the four
attributes is w = (0.3, 0.25, 0.25, 0.2)T.
The proposed decision making method is applied to
solve this problem for selecting suppliers.
For the evaluation of an alternative Ai (i =1, 2, 3, 4)
with respect to a criterion Cj (j =1, 2, 3, 4), it is obtained
from the questionnaire of a domain expert. For example,
when we ask the opinion of an expert about an alternative
A1 with respect to a criterion C1, he or she may say that the
possibility in which the statement is good is 0.5 and the
statement is poor is 0.3 and the degree in which he or she
is not sure is 0.1. For the neutrosophic notation, it can be
expressed as a11 = 0.5, 0.1, 0.3. Thus, when the four
possible alternatives with respect to the above four
11
attributes are evaluated by the similar method from the
expert, we can obtain the following single valued
neutrosophic decision matrix D:

D=

0.5,0.1,0.3
0.4,0.2,0.3

0.5,0.1,0.4
0.3,0.2,0.4

0.7,0.1,0.2
0.9,0.0,0.1

0.4,0.3,0.1

0.5,0.1,0.3

0.5,0.0,0.4

0.6,0.1,0.2

0.2,0.2,0.5

0.4,0.3,0.2

0.3,0.2,0.1

0.5,0.3,0.2
0.6,0.2,0.2

0.7,0.2,0.1

Then, we employ the developed approach to obtain the

most desirable alternative(s).
From the single valued neutrosophic decision matrix,
we can obtain the following ideal alternative:
A* = {C1 ,0.6,0.1,0.1 , C 2 ,0.5,0.1,0.3 , .
C3 ,0.9,0.0,0.1 , C 4 ,0.7,0.2,0.1}

By applying Eq. (3), we can obtain the values of the

weighted correlation coefficient W(Ai, A*) (i =1, 2, 3, 4):
W(A1, A*) = 0.7998, W(A2, A*) = 0.8756, W(A3, A*) =
0.7580, and W(A4, A*) = 0.7532.
Thus, the ranking order of the four alternatives is A2
A1 A3 A4. Therefore, the alternative A2 is the best
choice among the four alternatives.
From the two examples, we can see that the proposed
single valued neutrosophic multiple attribute decisionmaking method is more suitable for real scientific and
engineering applications because it can handle not only
incomplete information but also the indeterminate
information and inconsistent information which exist
commonly in real situations.
6 Conclusion

In this paper, we proposed another form of the

correlation coefficient between SVNSs. Then a multiple
attribute decision-making method has been established in
single valued neutrosophic setting by means of the
weighted correlation coefficient between each alternative
and the ideal alternative. Through the correlation
coefficient, the ranking order of all alternatives can be
determined and the best alternative can be easily identified
as well. Finally, two illustrative examples illustrated the
applications of the developed approach. Then the
technique proposed in this paper is suitable for handling
decision-making problems with single value neutrosophic
information and can provide a useful way for decisionmakers. In the future, we shall continue working in the
applications of the correlation coefficient between SVNSs
to other domains, such as data analysis and classification,
pattern recognition, and medical diagnosis.

References
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]

F. Smarandache. A unifying field in logics. neutrosophy:

Neutrosophic probability, set and logic, American Research
Press, Rehoboth,1999.
F. Smarandache, Neutrosophic set. A generalization of the
intuitionistic fuzzy set. International Journal of Pure and
Applied Mathematics, 24 (2005), 287-297.
H. Wang, F. Smarandache, Y.Q. Zhang, and R.
Sunderraman. Single valued neutrosophic sets, Multispace
and Multistructure 4 (2010) 410-413.
I.M. Hanafy, A.A. Salama, and K. Mahfouz. Correlation of
neutrosophic Data, International Refereed Journal of
Engineering and Science, 1(2) (2012), 39-43.

Jun Ye, Another Form of Correlation Coefficient between Single Valued Neutrosophic Sets
and Its Multiple Attribute Decision-Making Method

12

[5]

[6]

Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, Vol. 1, 2013

J. Ye. Multicriteria decision-making method using the

correlation coefficient under single-valued neutrosophic
environment, International Journal of General Systems,
42(4) (2013), 386-394.
M . Hanafy, A. A. Salama, and K. M. Mahfouz. Correlation
Coefficients of Neutrosophic Sets by Centroid Method,
International Journal of Probability and Statistics, 2(1)
(2013), 9-12

[7]
[8]

Z.S. Xu, J. Chen, and J.J. Wu. Clustering algorithm for

intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Information Sciences, 178 (2008),
37753790.
S. Broumi, F. Smarandache , Correlation Coefficient of
Interval Neutrosophic set, Periodical of Applied
Mechanics and Materials, Vol. 436, 2013, with the title
Engineering Decisions and Scientific Research in
Aerospace,
Robotics,
Biomechanics,
Mechanical
Engineering and Manufacturing; Proceedings of the
International Conference ICMERA, Bucharest, October
(2013).
Received: Nov. 1st, 2013. Accepted: Nov. 20, 2013

Jun Ye, Another Form of Correlation Coefficient between Single Valued Neutrosophic Sets
and Its Multiple Attribute Decision-Making Method