Final Assignment: 42106 Financial Risk Management
Final Assignment: 42106 Financial Risk Management
Final Assignment
by
Jonatan Bording (s091100)
at
Spring 2014
Final Assignment
Contents
1
Introduction
Methods
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
3
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
DTU
9
9
10
10
11
11
12
12
13
14
14
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Risk reduction
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
5.6
3
4
4
6
7
8
9
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
5
.
.
.
.
.
.
3.1 Portfolio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.1.1 Mutual funds, stocks and options in portfolio
3.1.2 Forward contract in portfolio . . . . . . . . .
3.1.3 Bonds in portfolio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.2 Risk factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.2.1 EURUSD Exchange rates . . . . . . . . . . .
3.2.2 GBPUSD Exchange rates . . . . . . . . . . .
3.2.3 Interest rates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.2.4 Equity market risk factors . . . . . . . . . . .
3.2.5 Bond risk factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4
.
.
.
.
.
.
14
15
18
20
22
23
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Jonatan Bording
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
23
23
24
24
25
26
1
Final Assignment
27
27
30
DTU
33
Jonatan Bording
Final Assignment
Introduction
A portfolio consisting of multiple assets is exposed to the risk of a loss which might result
from typical movements in nancial markets. The value-at-risk (VaR) is a measure of the
possible downside from an investment or portfolio. It is an estimate, with a given degree
of condence, of how much one can lose from one's portfolio over a given time horizon.
The purpose of this paper is to construct of portfolio consisting of dierent types of assets
and estimate the VaR of the portfolio using the delta-normal method. The delta-normal
method estimates the VaR assuming that the distribution of the changes in the value of
the assets follow a normal distribution.
The majority of the theory presented and used methods were inspired by Philippe Jorion's
"Financial Risk Manager Handbook" 6th edition and Dan Stefanica's "A Primer for the
Mathematics of Financial Engineering" Second Edition. Calculations were accomplished
using MathWorks MATLAB 2014a with Statistical Toolbox and Financial Toolbox. Code
is provided in the appendix.
2
2.1
Methods
Foreign currency risk
p
(j)
(1)
DTU
Jonatan Bording
2.2
Final Assignment
Portfolio mapping
Rp =
N
X
wi Ri = w1 w2
i=1
R1
i R2
. . . wN . = wT R
..
RN
t
. If we express the return of an individual equity i as a linear combination
where Ri,t = P
Pt
of a constant i,0 , components due to market changes (i,k for k = 1, .., K ) and an error
term i we have
h
Ri = 1 F1 F2
i,0
i,1
. . . FK i,2
+ i = F i + i
..
.
i,K
(2)
where Fk is the k-th market factor and i,k is the sensitivity of asset i to market factor
Fk for k = 1, 2, . . . , K .
Written in matrix-form, the portfolio return can then be decomposed into
Rp = wT ( T F + ) = wT T F + wT
(3)
where is a K + 1 N matrix.
2.3
If the market factors and the residuals error in (3) are independent and we assume that
the residual errors are uncorrelated, the variance of the equity porfolio is
p2 = V [Rp ] = wT T F w + wT 2 w
If the portfolio is well diversied the variance of the residuals should be small and we
thereby have
p2 wT T F w
(4)
DTU
Jonatan Bording
Final Assignment
Hence, we if we map the equities in our portfolio to certain market factors we can estimate
the portfolio variance by only concentrating on a few market factors instead of computing
the covariance of all assets in our portfolio.
If we assume that the returns and the market factors for our portfolio are jointly
normally distributed, we can compute the portfolio VaR for the equities on a j-step timehorizon as
p
VaR (j) = z p jVp
(5)
where Vp is the current value of the equity portfolio and z is a standard normal deviate
at a certain condence level .
If our portfolio holds options we have to modify (5) slightly. We can approximate the
change in the price of an option as the product of the delta and the change in price of the
underlying
f (S, t) = S
(6)
The delta for a European call option on a asset can be calculated from the BlackScholes formula as
= N (d1 )
(7)
ln
d1 =
S
K
2
+ r q + 2 (T t)
T t
where S is the spot price of the underlying at time t; T is the maturity-date of the option;
r is the risk-free interest rate (assumed to be constant); q is the continuous dividend rate
of the underlying, and is the standard deviation of the returns on the underlying.
If we wish to map the change the price of an option to market factors we can given (6)
and (2) write the approximation
Roption,i (FT i + i )i
(8)
We can then modify (4) by introducing a N 1 vector d with entries di such that
di =
(9)
and write
p2 (w d)T T F (w d)
(10)
where denotes the entrywise product. We then have that the delta-normal VaR for this
DTU
Jonatan Bording
Final Assignment
mixed portfolio is
q
p
VaR (j) = z (w d)T T F (w d) jVp
2.4
(11)
1
1
K
1 + rt T
1 + rt T
(12)
where St is the spot price of foreign currency, rt is an interest rate on the foreign currency,
rt is the interest rate on the domestic currency, T is the time to maturity (in years) and
K is the delivery price. If we denote the present value of one unit of currency at maturity
as P V and P V we can rewrite (12) as
ft = St P Vt K P Vt
(13)
St
PV
PV
(14)
P V
P V
St
+ (St P V )
(K P V )
St
PV
PV
(15)
dft = (St P V )
We see that the change in the price of the forward contract is exposed to three risk factors;
St P V
V
, P V and P
. Let the time to maturity T = tM tt+1 . We then have that
St
PV
P V
=
PV
1
1+rt (t1m tt )
1+rt+1 (tm tt+1 )
1
1+rt (tm tt )
1 + rt (tm tt )
1
1 + rt+1 (tm tt+1 )
Thus, if we obtain historical data for the exchange rate and the interest rates we can compute the covariance of the risk factor and thereby estimate
the variance of ft . Let de- i
h
0
note the covariance matrix of the risk factors and let x = (St P V ) (St P V ) (K P V ) .
The variance in the change of the price for the forward contract is then
2
= V [ft ] = x0 x
f
t
DTU
Jonatan Bording
(16)
Final Assignment
Assuming that risk factors are jointly normally distributed we can compute the VaR
VaR (j) = z ft j
p
2.5
The Macaulay duration of a bond is the weighted average time until repayment, i.e.
DM ac
n
1 X ti CFi
=
B i=1 (1 + ykk )kti
(17)
(18)
Dmac
(1 + ykk )
(19)
If we denote the dollar duration D$ = BDmod as the unnormalized version of the modied
duration, then (19) can be written as
(20)
B D$ y
N
X
i=1
Bi
N
X
D$,i yi
(21)
i=1
For many bonds it is not possible to obtain historical data. Therefore we need to
map each position in our bond portfolio to some risk factor(s). One approach is duration
DTU
Jonatan Bording
Final Assignment
mapping, which maps bonds according to their Dmac to the closest possible maturity of
a zero-coupon bond for which historical data is available. As an example, lets consider
a standard grid of maturities of 1, 3, 5 and 10 years. Let Dmac and D$ be vectors
containing the macaulay durations and the dollar durations, respectively, for the bonds in
our portfolio and let n be a vector where ni is the number of units of the i-th bond in the
portfolio. Let xD$ be a vector where the k-th elements is the sum of the dollar durations
of the bonds in our portfolio for which their macaulay durations where nearest to the k-th
standard maturity. If we have N number of bonds in our porfolio the mappings can be
described as f : RN 3 N4
P
N
n D 1(Dmac,i )[0,2)
Pi=1 i $,i
n
D
1(D
)
i
mac,i
$,i
[2,4)
f (Dmac , D$ , n) = PNi=1
= xD $
n
D
1(D
)
i
mac,i
$,i
[4,7.5)
i=1
P
N
n
D
1(D
)
mac,i [7.5,)
i=1 i $,i
1 if Di A
.
where 1(Dmac,i )A =
0 if D
/A
(22)
VB xTD$ r +
(23)
where r is the changes in the zero rates (i.e. the changes in the yields for the standard
grid of maturities).
2.6
If we take the variance of (23) and we assume that the errors are uncorrelated with the
changes in the zero rates we get
V [VB ] xTD$ r xD$ + 2
If the portfolio is well-diversied the error term should be relatively small and we can
therefore instead write
2
V
xTD$ r xD$
(24)
B
DTU
Jonatan Bording
Final Assignment
Assuming that the changes in the zero rates are jointly normally distributed we can now
compute the j-step value-at-risk for a bond portfolio as
VaR (j) = z VB j
p
3.1
Portfolio
The constructed porfolio consists of; 1 forward contract on British pounds, 5 dierent
U.S. mutual funds, 7 dierent U.S. stocks, 3 dierent stocks traded on Xetra (Frankfurt),
3 dierent European call stock options on U.S. stocks, and 15 dierent coupon-bearing
U.S. treasury bonds.
3.1.1
Prices and specications for the mutual funds, stocks, options and bonds were obtained
from finance.yahoo.com/ and specications are summarized in table 2.
Investment Type
Ticker / Underlying Currency Holding Strike Maturity date Dividend
Mutual fund
MUTF:VESIX
USD 1m USD
Mutual fund
MUTF:FANAX
USD 1m USD
Mutual fund
MUTF:TFSIX
USD 1m USD
Mutual fund
MUTF:BGSAX
USD 1m USD
Mutual fund
MUTF:JDESEAX
USD 1m USD
Stock
NASDAQ:MSFT
USD 1m USD
Stock
NASDAQ:EBAY
USD 1m USD
Stock
NYSE:IBM
USD 1m USD
Stock
NYSE:WMT
USD 1m USD
Stock
NYSE:XOM
USD 1m USD
Stock
NYSE:CVX
USD 1m USD
Stock
NYSE:C
USD 1m USD
Stock
FRA:DBK
Euros 1m USD
Stock
FRA:BAS
Euros 1m USD
Stock
FRA:LHA
Euros 1m USD
European Call Option
NYSE:JPM
USD 1m USD 52.50
20-Sep-14
0.38%
European Call Option NASDAQ:INTC
USD 1m USD 24.50
18-Oct-14
0.225%
European Call Option
NYSE:UTX
USD 1m USD 120.00 17-Jan-15
0.59%
Table 1: Mutual funds, Stocks and Options in portfolio.
Weekly historical data for the equities were obtained from 04-May-2004 to 06-May2014. The time series are plotted in gure 1.
DTU
Jonatan Bording
Final Assignment
Figure 1: Weekly movements in mutual funds and Stocks in portfolio from 04-May-2004 to 06-May-2014.
3.1.2
The forward contract in the portfolio assumes that we buy 10, 000, 000 at a price of
$16, 725, 000 on 20-Aug-2014 specied as
Delivery
Purchase price K Maturity date tm
GBP 10,000,000 USD 16,725,000
20-Aug-2014
Table 2: Forward Contract.
3.1.3
Bonds in portfolio
DTU
Jonatan Bording
10
Final Assignment
units
200
100
150
120
100
170
100
100
130
200
190
140
140
130
160
Table 3: Specications for bonds in portfolio. Face value for all bonds are $10,000. Prices are given as
percentage of face value. Units refer to the number of units of each bond in portfolio.
3.2
3.2.1
Risk factors
EURUSD Exchange rates
Figure 2: Weekly movements EUR/USD exchange rate ($ per 1 ) from 15-May-2004 to 05-May-2014.
DTU
Jonatan Bording
11
3.2.2
Final Assignment
We have a forward contract on 10m British pound in USD. Therefore we need data for the
GBP/USD exchange rate ($ per 1 ). Historical weekly data from for the GPB/USD rates
from 9-May-2004 to 5-May-2014 was obtained from oanda.com. The data is plotted in
gure 3
Figure 3: Weekly movements in EUR/USD exchange rate ($ per 1 ) from 9-May-2004 to 5-May-2014.
3.2.3
Interest rates
Risk factors on the forward contract include USD interest rates and GBP interest rates.
Historical data from 7-May-2004 to 3-May-2014 for 3-month LIBOR rates on GBP and
USD was obtained from the Federal Reserve Economic Data (research.stlouisfed.org/fred2).
The data is plotted in gure 4.
DTU
Jonatan Bording
12
Final Assignment
Based on the industry sectors of the equities in our portfolio, the following market indices was identied as risk factors: Dow Jones Industrial Average Index, NYSE US 100
Index, NASDAQ Computer Index, KBW Bank Index, Dow Jones U.S Oil and Gas Index and DAX (Deutscher Aktien Index). Weekly historical data was obtained from
finance.yahoo.com/ and is plotted in gure 5.
Figure 5: Weekly movements in Stock market indices from 04-May-2004 to 06-May-2014. Abbreviations:
NASDAQ Computer Index, IXCO; NYSE 100 Index, NY; Dow Jones Industrial Average Index, DJI; KBW
Bank Index, BKX; Dow Jones U.S Oil and Gas Index, DJUSEN; Deutscher Aktien Index, DAX.
DTU
Jonatan Bording
13
3.2.5
Final Assignment
As risk factors for the Bonds in the portfolio, yields for 1 year, 3 year, 5 year and 10 year
zero-coupon US Treasury bonds was choosen. Weekly historical yields from 7-May-2004
to 03-May-2014 was obtained from the Federal Reserve Economic Data
(research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/). The data is plotted in gure 6.
Figure 6: Weekly movements in yields (as percentages) of US zero-coupon Treasury Bonds with dierent
maturities.
4
4.1
St+1
1
St
DTU
Jonatan Bording
14
Final Assignment
Figure 7: Distribution of relative weekly changes ind EUR/USD exchanges rate the past 10 years.
We nd that the 5% emperical quantile is q0.05 = 0.017463. Using (1) we get
p
V aR0.05 (2)EU RU SD = 0.017463 $3, 000, 000 (2) = $74, 090
for the 10 business day (2 weeks) 5% VaR. (see appendix A for matlab code)
4.2
First, we compute the returns on the market indices and on the equities in our portfolio
computed as Rt+1 = PPt+1
1. The results are plotted in gure 8.
t
DTU
Jonatan Bording
15
Final Assignment
Figure 8: Returns on market indices and on stocks and mutual funds in portfolio.Red lines illustrates
tted normal curve.
We see that that the returns are centered around zero and seem stationary in most
periods.
In gure 9 we also see that the distributions of most of the market indices look normal.
DTU
Jonatan Bording
16
Final Assignment
Intercept (0 )
IXCO (1 )
NY (2 )
DJI (3 )
BKX (4 )
DJUSEN (5 )
DAX (6 )
R2
MUTF:VESIX
0.0000
0.0835
0.3482
0.0651
0.0141
0.1971
0.4588
0.8452
MUTF:FANAX
0.0002
0.1702
0.0360
0.4413
0.0738
1.1462
0.1527
0.9425
MUTF:TFSIX
0.0000
0.0651
0.4069
0.1088
0.0653
0.0036
0.2130
0.8033
MUTF:BGSAX
0.0002
0.7223
0.3803
0.0828
0.0580
0.0080
0.0460
0.8980
MUTF:JDESEAX
0.0005
0.1734
0.8022
0.0092
0.0193
0.0123
0.0141
0.9876
NASDAQ:MSFT
0.0002
0.7562
0.6655
0.9337
0.0503
0.0755
0.0223
0.5000
NASDAQ:EBAY
0.0003
0.8446
0.4891
0.1226
0.0597
0.0281
0.0058
0.3760
NYSE:IBM
0.0005
0.3255
1.0920
1.6782
0.0061
0.0056
0.0207
0.6028
NYSE:WMT
0.0013
0.1932
0.7858
0.7900
0.1751
0.2755
0.1545
0.4148
NYSE:XOM
0.0007
0.2238
0.0809
0.6141
0.1222
0.6518
0.1227
0.7911
NYSE:CVX
0.0009
0.2008
0.1010
0.4589
0.0692
0.7798
0.0738
0.8357
NYSE:C
0.0031
0.0301
0.0250
0.1576
1.1983
0.0625
0.0469
0.8364
FRA:DBK
0.0017
0.0499
0.5470
0.7581
0.3701
0.0985
1.2484
0.6324
FRA:BAS
0.0032
0.0416
0.6211
1.2850
0.0380
0.3079
1.1571
0.3468
FRA:LHA
0.0000
0.1130
0.1477
0.0660
0.0770
0.2288
0.8695
0.5129
NYSE:JPM
0.0024
0.0838
0.6959
0.1803
0.8515
0.2588
0.0394
0.7773
0.0008
0.9123
0.6873
0.9878
0.0245
0.0734
0.0708
0.6032
0.0013
0.0552
0.7919
1.6230
0.0608
0.0142
0.0768
0.6955
NASDAQ:INTC
NYSE:UTX
Table 4: Results from multivariate linear regression between returns on stocks and mutual funds and
returns on market indices.
From the coecients of determination (R2 ) we see that most of the volatility in the
portfolio can be explained by the market indices. Not surprisingly, the fraction of variance
DTU
Jonatan Bording
17
Final Assignment
unexplained is smallest for the mutual funds. We will assume that the portfolio is well
diversied such that the variance which is not explained by our model will be very small.
Going forward we compute the standard deviation of the underlyings of the options in
order to compute the deltas using (7). We obtain the vector described in (9)
i
d = 1 1 . . . 0.8183 0.9957 0.1237
0
We have equal weights in the portfolio of 1m USD in each position, so wi = 181 for
i = 1, .., 18 as N = 18. We compute the covariance matrix of the market indices F and
subsequently the portfolio variance using (10)
p2 = (w d)T T F (w d) = 0.02592
Assuming that the joint distribution of the market indices are normally distributed, we
are now able to estimate the 5% value at risk on a 10 business days horizon using (11)
p
V aR0.05 (2)stock,f unds,options = 1.6449 0.0259 $18, 000, 000 (2) = $1, 084, 563
In order to compute the value at risk for the forward contract we rst must compute
the relative monthly changes in the GBP/USD exchange rate and relative changes in the
present value of GBP and USD computed as
U SD
GBP
P Vt+1
P Vt+1
1 + rtU SD (tm tt )
1 + rtGBP (tm tt )
=
1,
=
1,
U SD
GBP
P VtU SD
1 + rt+1
(tm tt+1 )
P VtGBP
1 + rt+1
(tm tt+1 )
St+1
St+1
=
1
St
St
DTU
Jonatan Bording
18
Final Assignment
Figure 10: time series of the risk factors associated with the forward contract; RS , RP V
U SD
t+1
t+1
Figure 11: Distributions of the risk factors associated with the forward contract; RS , Rr
t+1
, RP VPGBP
.
V +1
U SD
t+1
GBP .
, Rrt+1
We see that the distributions of the risk factors does not seem to approximate normal
distributions really well. They are however centered around zero and going forward we
will assume that they are normally distributed.
The current spot price for 10m GBP is St = $16, 842, 000. The delivery price is K =
$16, 725, 000. The time to maturity is 0.29166 year and the current LIBOR rates are
rtGBP = 0.005252 and rtU SD = 0.002229. Computing the vector x we get
h
i
x0 = (St P V ) (St P V ) (K P V )
h
i
= $16, 815, 996 $16, 815, 996 $16, 714, 033
By computing the covariance matrix of the risk factors and using (16) we can calculate
the variance
2
f
= x0 x = $185, 0402
t
DTU
Jonatan Bording
19
Final Assignment
Assuming that the risk factors are jointly normally distributed we can calculate the 5%
VaR on a 10 business day time horizon for the forward contract
V aR0.05 (2)ft = 1.6449 $185, 040
2 = $430, 436
In order to compute the risk associated with our bond positions we compute the week-toweek dierence in yields of our bond risk factors (zero-coupon bonds). These are plotted
in gure 12 and gure 13
Figure 12: Week-to-week dierences in yields for zero-coupon US treasury bonds (r) with dierent
maturities.
DTU
Jonatan Bording
20
Final Assignment
Figure 13: Distributions of Week-to-week dierences in yields for zero-coupon US treasury bonds (r)
with dierent maturities. Red lines illustrates tted normal curves.
We see that the zero rates r are centered around zero and they are highly correlated.
The distributions of the risk factors look somewhat normally distributed.
Next, we compute the durations Dmac,i and the dollar durations D$,i of the bonds in our
portfolio using (17) and store the number of units for each bond type in the portfolio in
a vector n
Dmac
DTU
1.056
0.99846
2.0293
1.9958
2.6706
3.0387
3.0317
= 4.6418
4.9174
5.6039
6.3009
8.0451
9.4094
9.1127
10.564
108.75
$105.85
$209.54
$213.55
$339.73
$300.7
$318.89
D$ = $500.22
$477.09
$794.76
$671.79
$768.33
$959.16
$1289.1
$1368.8
Jonatan Bording
200
100
150
120
100
170
100
n = 100
130
200
190
140
140
130
160
21
Final Assignment
and using the mapping in (22) with standard maturities 1, 3, 5, and 10 years we get
f (Dmac , D$ , n) = xD$
$57961.45
$148412.85
$398636.01
$628449.85
If we compute the covariance matrix r of the changes in the zero rates we are now able
to estimate the variance of the bond positions using (24)
2
V
xTD$ r xD$ = $1170.92
B
Assuming that the risk factors are jointly normally distributed we can now estimate the
5% VaR on a 10 day time horizon
VaR (j) = 1.64485 1170.9
$10, 000
2 = $272, 371
100
Total VaR
We have now calculated the 10 business day 5% VaR for the dierent parts of our portfolio.
Assuming that changes in the value of the dierent parts of our portfolio is uncorrelated*
we can aggregate their VaR together and we should have the value at risk for the whole
portfolio
V aR0.05 (2)total = V aR0.05 (2)EU RU SD + V aR0.05 (2)stock,f unds,options + V aR0.05 (2)ft + VaR (2)bonds
= $74, 090 $1, 084, 563 $430, 436 $ 272, 371
= $1, 861, 460
Jonatan Bording
$1,861,460
$42,109,228
22
Final Assignment
(*It is of course naive to assume that the volatility of stocks, options and funds are uncorrelated with the
volatility of bonds, interest rates and exchanges rates. Just by looking at the plots in gure 8, 10 and 12
we see that the variance increases dramatically around year 2007 to 2009 for all risk factors.)
Risk reduction
In the following subsections, describtions on how we could reduce the risk of our portfolio
is presented.
5.1
We have a 3m USD exposure to EUR in our equity portfolio in the form of foreign stocks.
We could lock in the current exchange rate by shorting futures contracts on EUR and we
would thereby reduced the risk associated with movements in exchanges rates.
5.2
In order to reduce the risk related to the equities in our portfolio we could short some
futures contract on some broad market index which correlates well with our equity positions. Let Vequity be the change in value of the equity positions in our portfolio. If we
short some number NF of futures contracts with dollar value F on a broad market index
then the total change in value of our portfolio will be
V = Vequity NF F
(25)
We want to nd the number of contracts to shorts such that we minimize the variance of
the value of our portfolio, so we take the derivative of (25) with respect to NF and set it
equal to zero
2
V
= 2NF F 2Vequity F = 0
dNF
DTU
Jonatan Bording
23
Final Assignment
NF =
Vequity F
Vequity
= Vequity F
F
F
We call NF the optimal hedge ratio and Vequity F is then a measure of how much of the
volatility we would be able to hedge using the futures contracts. Letting Requity denote
the return on the equity part of our portfolio and Rindex denote the return on the market
index which the futures contract is set on. If each futures contracts deliver QF dollars
times the index such that F = QF index, then we can express the number of futures
contracts we want to short NF as
NF = Vequity F
Requity
Vequity
= Requity ,Rindex
QF Rindex
QF index
where Requity ,Rindex can be found by performing linear regression of Requity over Rindex .
5.3
Another way to try and reduce the risk of the portfolio could be to nd a linear combination of the weight in our portfolio that would minimize the variance f2unds,stocks . That
is, we adjust the weights of the positions in the mutual funds and stock such that we
minimize the variance
min f2unds,stocks = wT T F w
subject to
N
X
wi = 1
i=1
Delta hedging
Let i denote the value of the i-th option in our portfolio and let Si denote the current
stock price of the i-th underlying. Consider the case that we want to reduce the risk of
the option positions by shorting some number of shares ni of the underlyings on the call
options and let Ci denote the the current value of the i-th call option. The value of our
option positions is then
i (Si ) = Ci (Si ) ni Si
DTU
Jonatan Bording
24
Final Assignment
for the i-th option. Assume that the spot price of the underlying changes to by Si + dSi
where dSi is small relative to the Si . The change in the value of our portfolio is then
i (Si + dSi ) i (Si ) = Ci (Si + dSi ) ni (Si + dSi ) (Ci (Si ) ni Si )
= Ci (Si + dSi ) C(Si ) ni dSi
(26)
We want to choose the value of ni such that for a small change in the underlying, the
value of our portfolio does not change. Hence, we want to choose ni such that
(27)
and by letting dS 0
ni
dCi
= i
dSi
Hence, if we want to reduce the risk associated with the options in our portfolio we should
short sell i shares of the i-th underlying of each of the 3 options in our portfolio.
5.5
In our forward contract we had an spot price St and a delivery price Kf with a time to
maturity Tf . Now consider that we set up a long position in an European put option Pt
and a short position in an European call option Pt on 10m GBP on both options with a
common strike Koptions and a time to maturity Toptions . The put-call parity then states
that the value of the options at time t is
Pt Ct = Koptions
1
1+
rtU SD Toptions
St
1
1+
rtGBP Toptions
DTU
1
1+
rtGBP Tf
Kf
1
1+
Jonatan Bording
rtU SD Tf
25
Final Assignment
We then see that the combined value of the forward contract and the options is zero
ft + Pt Ct = Koptions
1
1+
rtU SD Toptions
St
1
1+
rtGBP Toptions
+ St
1
1+
rtGBP Tf
Kf
1
1+
rtU SD Tf
=0
if Tf = Toptions and Kf = Koptions . Hence, if we long a GBP put and short a GBP call
with the same strike Kf and maturity Tf we have eliminated the risk of our long position
in the forward contract with delivery price Kf and maturity Tf .
5.6
Duration hedging
If we want to reduce the risk of our bond portfolio we can hedge the dollar duration of
our bond portfolio. Let VB be the value of our bond porfolio with total dollar duration
P
D$,VB = N
i=1 D$,i . If we take an additional position of n number of units in an additional
bond Badd with a moded duration Dmod,add , the new value of the bond portfolio is then
VB,new = VB + nBadd
If we want to hedge the risk of our bond portfolio we would want the dollar duration of
our new portfolio to be zero
D$,VB,new = D$,VB + nD$,Badd = 0
nD$,Badd = D$,VB
n =
D$,VB
D$,VB
=
D$,Badd
Dmod,add Badd
Hence, we should short n number of units of the additional bond with a total dollar
duration equal to the dollar duration of our bond portfolio. It is probably unlikely that
we would be able to match the dollar durations with only one additional bond but the
idea can be expanded to multiple additional bonds
n1 Dmod,add,1 Badd,1 n2 Dmod,add,2 Badd,2 ... = D$,VB
such that a linear combination of the dollar durations of dierent additional bonds would
match the dollar duration of our portfolio. Note that, the same principles applies if we
choose to hedge using futures contracts on bonds instead.
DTU
Jonatan Bording
26
Final Assignment
[, , rates] = xlsread('EUR_USD.xlsx');
rates = str2double(rates);
time = import_dates('eur_usd_dates.csv');
ts = fints(time,rates,'EURUSD');
plot(ts)
8
9
10
R_fx = rates(1:end-1)./rates(2:end)-1;
11
[f,x]=hist(R_fx,30);
12
bar(x,f/sum(f))
13
ylabel('Density')
14
xlabel('R EURUSD')
15
16
%% find 5% quantile
17
alpha = 0.05;
18
SR_fx=sort(R_fx);
19
N=size(R_fx,1);
20
q=SR_fx(floor(alpha*N));
21
22
23
W = 3000000;
24
VaR_fx=q*W*sqrt(2)
format long g
%% Load Indices
[, , Indices] = xlsread('equities.xlsx','Factors');
Indices_names = Indices(1,2:end);
Indices = Indices(2:end,2:end);
Indices = str2double(Indices);
7
8
%% Load Stocks
[, , Stocks] = xlsread('equities.xlsx','Stocks');
10
Stocks_names = Stocks(1,2:end);
11
Stocks = Stocks(2:end,2:end);
DTU
Jonatan Bording
27
Final Assignment
12
Stocks = str2double(Stocks);
13
14
[, , Funds] = xlsread('equities.xlsx','Funds');
15
Fund_names = Funds(1,2:end);
16
Funds = Funds(2:end,2:end);
17
Funds = str2double(Funds);
18
19
20
[, , Options] = xlsread('equities.xlsx','Options');
21
Options = Options(2:end,2:end);
22
Options_Strike = str2double(Options(:,1));
23
Options_exp = Options(:,2);
24
Options_dividends = str2double(Options(:,3));
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
time = import_dates('DATES.csv');
32
ts = fints(time,stocks_funds,names);
33
plot(ts)
34
35
%% Plot Indices
36
ts = fints(time,Indices,Indices_names);
37
plot(ts)
38
39
40
R_stocks_funds = stocks_funds(1:end-1,:)./stocks_funds(2:end,:)-1;
41
42
43
44
R = R_Indices(:,2:end);
45
figure
46
subplot(2,1,1);
47
ts_rIndices = fints(time(1:end-1),R,Indices_names);
48
plot(ts_rIndices)
49
ylabel('R_F')
50
subplot(2,1,2);
51
ts_rEquities = fints(time(1:end-1),R_stocks_funds,names);
52
plot(ts_rEquities)
53
ylabel('R_s')
DTU
Jonatan Bording
28
Final Assignment
54
55
56
figure
57
subplot(2,3,1);
58
histfit(R_Indices(:,2))
59
title(Indices_names(1))
60
subplot(2,3,2);
61
histfit(R_Indices(:,3))
62
title(Indices_names(2))
63
subplot(2,3,3);
64
histfit(R_Indices(:,4))
65
title(Indices_names(3))
66
subplot(2,3,4);
67
histfit(R_Indices(:,5))
68
title(Indices_names(4))
69
subplot(2,3,5);
70
histfit(R_Indices(:,6))
71
title(Indices_names(5))
72
subplot(2,3,6);
73
histfit(R_Indices(:,7))
74
title(Indices_names(6))
75
76
n=size(stocks_funds,2);
77
Beta=zeros(size(R_Indices,2),n);
78
R_squares = size(size(Indices,2),1);
79
80
for i=1:n
81
[B,BINT,R,RINT,STATS] = regress(R_stocks_funds(:,i),R_Indices);
82
Beta(:,i)=B;
83
R_squares(i) = STATS(1);
84
end
85
86
87
88
sd_underlying = std(R_stocks_funds(:,end-2:end));
89
90
%% Compute
91
92
rate = 0.0009*ones(3,1);
current_date = '05-May-2014';
93
94
Spot_prices = Stocks(1,end-2:end);
95
Deltas = zeros(3,1);
96
for i=1:3
DTU
Jonatan Bording
29
97
98
99
Final Assignment
end
100
101
%% compute vector d
102
d = [ones(size(R_stocks_funds,2)-3,1); Deltas];
103
104
105
Sigma_F = cov(R_Indices);
106
107
108
109
w = ones(size(R_stocks_funds,2),1)/size(R_stocks_funds,2);
110
sd_portfolio = sqrt((w.*d)'*Beta'*Sigma_F*Beta*(w.*d));
111
112
113
V_p = 1000000*size(R_stocks_funds,2);
114
115
z = norminv(0.05);
116
VaR_equities = z*sd_portfolio*V_p*sqrt(2);
117
118
%% Risk reduction
119
120
A=ones(1,15);
121
b=1;
122
Aeq = ones(1,15);
123
beq=1;
124
125
126
x = fmincon(fun,x0,A,b,Aeq,beq);
127
128
129
130
131
132
%% Include 3 new
133
1
2
DTU
Jonatan Bording
30
Final Assignment
%time = import_dates('3month-T-bill_dates_US.csv');
[, , raw] = xlsread('liborrates.xlsx','Sheet1');
raw(R) = {NaN};
data = reshape([raw{:}],size(raw));
libor_GBP = data(:,1);
10
11
libor_USD = data(:,2);
12
13
14
%% import dates
15
16
delimiter = '';
17
formatSpec = '%s%[^\n\r]';
18
fileID = fopen(filename,'r');
19
20
fclose(fileID);
21
dates
= dataArray{:, 1};
22
23
24
[, , rates] = xlsread('GBP_USD.xlsx');
25
rates_gbpusd = cell2mat(rates);
26
time = import_dates('gbp_usd_dates.csv');
27
ts_gbpusd = fints(time,rates_gbpusd,'GBPUSD');
28
plot(ts_gbpusd)
29
30
31
names = cellstr(['liborGBP';'liborUSD']);
32
33
ts_libor_weekly =toweekly(ts_libor);
34
plot(ts_libor_weekly)
35
36
37
exp_date = '20-Aug-2014';
38
39
40
41
libor_weekly = fts2mat(ts_libor_weekly);
42
%reverse order
43
libor_weekly = flip(libor_weekly);
DTU
Jonatan Bording
31
Final Assignment
44
45
dPV_USD = zeros(length(times)-1,1);
46
dPV_GBP = dPV_USD;
47
for t=1:(length(times)-1)
dPV_USD(t) = ...
48
(1+libor_weekly(t,2)*times(t))/(1+libor_weekly(t+1,2)*times(t+1))-1;
dPV_GBP(t) = ...
49
(1+libor_weekly(t,1)*times(t))/(1+libor_weekly(t+1,1)*times(t+1))-1;
50
end
51
52
ts_R_fx = tick2ret(ts_gbpusd);
53
dR_fx = fts2mat(ts_R_fx);
54
55
56
57
58
names = cellstr(['dS
59
ts_merged = fints(time(1:end-1),F,names);
60
plot(ts_merged)
61
62
63
figure;
64
subplot(1,3,1)
65
histfit(dR_fx)
66
title('dRfx')
67
subplot(1,3,2)
68
histfit(dPV_GBP)
69
title('dPVGBP')
70
subplot(1,3,3)
71
histfit(dPV_USD)
72
title('dPVUSD')
73
74
75
76
77
r_USD = libor_weekly(1,2);
78
79
PV_USD = 1/(1+r_USD*T);
r_GBP = libor_weekly(1,1);
80
PV_GBP = 1/(1+r_GBP*T);
81
82
%% compute variance
83
84
DTU
Jonatan Bording
32
85
Final Assignment
sd = sqrt(x'*Sigma_F*x);
86
87
88
z=norminv(0.05);
89
VaR_f=z*sd*sqrt(2);
90
91
92
ft = S*PV_GBP-K*PV_USD;
%% Load Bonds
[, , Bonds] = xlsread('bonds.xlsx','bond-holdings');
Bonds = Bonds(2:end,2:end);
Prices_B = str2double(Bonds(:,1));
CouponRates_B = str2double(Bonds(:,2));
Settles_B = Bonds(:,3);
Maturities_B = Bonds(:,4);
IssueDates_B = Bonds(:,5);
10
FirstCouponDates_B = Bonds(:,6);
11
Units_B = cell2mat(Bonds(:,7));
12
13
14
15
[, , raw] = xlsread('bonds.xlsx','zerorates_hist');
16
T_names = raw(1,2:end);
17
zerorates = cell2mat(raw(2:end,2:end));
18
19
%% plot data
20
time = import_dates('treasury_dates.csv');
21
ts = fints(time,zerorates,T_names);
22
plot(ts)
23
24
25
26
ts = fints(time(2:end),_yield,T_names);
27
plot(ts)
28
ylabel('Delta_yield')
29
%% Compute bond duration and price for Bonds in portfolio and for risk ...
_yield = (zerorates(2:end,:)-zerorates(1:end-1,:))/100;
factors
30
DTU
Jonatan Bording
33
Final Assignment
31
32
IssueDates_B, FirstCouponDates_B);
33
34
35
36
CouponRates_B);
37
38
39
40
D_dollar = ModDuration.*Dirty_prices_B;
41
42
%% Duration Mapping
43
x_dur =zeros(4,1);
44
n = Units_B;
45
46
for i=1:length(YearDuration)
47
d = YearDuration(i);
48
if d < 2
x_dur(1)= x_dur(1)+1*D_dollar(i)*n(i);
49
elseif d < 4
50
x_dur(2) = x_dur(2)+1*D_dollar(i)*n(i);
51
52
x_dur(3) = x_dur(3)+1*D_dollar(i)*n(i);
53
else
54
x_dur(4) = x_dur(4)+1*D_dollar(i)*n(i);
55
end
56
57
end
58
59
60
Sigma_r = cov(_yield);
61
62
sd = sqrt(x_dur'*Sigma_r*x_dur);
63
64
65
alpha=0.05;
66
z=norminv(alpha);
67
68
69
70
Value_B = Dirty_prices_B.*n;
71
V_bonds = sum(Value_B)*100;
DTU
Jonatan Bording
34