Behavioral Intention of Public Transit Passengers (Perceive Value)
Behavioral Intention of Public Transit Passengers (Perceive Value)
Transport Policy
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/tranpol
Department of International Trade & Business Administration, Wenzao Ursuline College of Languages, 900 Mintsu 1st Road, Kaohsiung 80793, Taiwan
Department of Transportation & Communication Management Science, National Cheng Kung University, 1, Ta-Hsueh Rd., Tainan 701, Taiwan
a r t i c l e in f o
a b s t r a c t
Understanding the behavioral intentions of public transit passengers is important, because customer
loyalty is seen as a prime determinant of long-term nancial performance. This study highlights such
behavioral intentions and explores the relationships between passenger behavioral intentions and the
various factors that affect them. Apart from the factors recognized by past studies, such as service
quality, perceived value, and satisfaction, this study addresses the importance of the involvement of
public transit services in passenger behavioral intentions. By using passenger survey data from the
Kaohsiung Mass Rapid Transit (KMRT), a newly operating public transit system in Taiwan, we apply the
structural equation modeling technique to analyze the conceptualized relationship model. The ndings
reveal that all causal relationships are statistically signicant. Managerial implications are discussed.
& 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Involvement
Service quality
Perceived value
Satisfaction
Behavioral intentions
Public transit
1. Introduction
Reducing private transport use and increasing that of public
transport are two critical but challenging tasks for dealing with
the problem of urban transport. Public transport systems need
to become more market oriented and competitive, as they tend to
be viewed as service products. Along with the trend of the
privatization of public transport services over the past decade, the
nancial performance of private service providers has been a key
concern. Understanding the loyalty of public transit passengers is
important, because customer loyalty is seen as a prime determinant of a rms long-term nancial performance and is considered
a major source of competitive advantage (Lam et al., 2004). For
public transit managers, especially for a newly operating public
transit system like the Kaohsiung Mass Rapid Transit System
(KMRT) studied in this paper, understanding passengers behavioral intentions after experiencing the public transit services and
their associated inuential factors is also an essential task. This
information can help public transit managers and marketers
design effective strategies to meet passengers needs, and thus
retain existing passengers as well as attract new ones from other
modes.
Favorable behavioral intentions encompass three dimensions:
word-of-mouth, purchase intentions and price insensitivity, and
together form the customer loyalty. Satisfaction is generally seen
319
320
2.4. Involvement
The construct of involvement is crucial when considering an
individuals purchasing process and is addressed by attitudinal and
behavioral theories when tackling the issues of brand loyalty and
purchase intentions (Bennett et al., 2005). Involvement is intended to
cover an individuals subjective sense of the concern, care, importance, personal relevance, and signicance attached to an attitude, a
persons motivational state of mind with regard to an object or
activity, or the mobilization of behavioral resources for the achievement of relevant goals (Olsen, 2007). Involvement refers to a persons
feelings about the relevance or importance of an object based on their
inherent needs, values, and interests (Zaichkowsky, 1985).
Since an individual can be involved with advertisements,
products, or purchasing decisions, the concept of involvement
with these different objects leads to various responses. Involvement with products has been hypothesized to lead to a greater
perception of attribute differences, a perception of greater
product importance, and a greater commitment to brand choice.
Involvement with purchases leads to searches for additional
information and more time spent searching for the right selection.
For example, involvement with advertising can lead an individual
to give more counterarguments to the messages it contains
(Zaichkowsky, 1985). Zaichkowsky (1985) argued that a measure
of involvement which can be used across various research studies
might include three categories: personal (i.e. the inherent
interests, values, or needs that motivate an individuals feelings
toward the object), physical (i.e. the characteristics of the object
that cause differentiation and increase interest), and situational
(i.e. factors that temporarily increase or decrease the relevance of
or interest in the object). Evidence that these three factors
inuence a consumers level of involvement or response to
products, advertising, and purchasing decisions has been widely
found in the literature. In the public transport context, Lai and
Lu (2007) relied on Zaichkowsky (1985) to develop a public
transport involvement scale covering personal (e.g. connection
with public transport), product (e.g. fare and performance) and
situational factors (e.g. time pressure and weather conditions) to
measure Taiwanese travelers involvement in public transport
services. Public transit involvement is dened as the level of
interest or importance of public transit to a passenger in the
current study.
H4
H2
Service
quality
H1
Satisfaction
H9
Behavioral
intention
H3
H8
H5
Perceived
value
Involvement
H6
H7
Fig. 1. The conceptual model.
H10
140,000
120,000
Red Line
Orange Line
Total
100,000
80,000
60,000
40,000
20,000
0
04
/2
00
05 8
/2
00
06 8
/2
00
07 8
/2
00
08 8
/2
00
09 8
/2
00
10 8
/2
00
11 8
/2
00
12 8
/2
00
01 8
/2
00
9
3. Methods
160,000
Ridership (passenger)
trip experience to fulll the passengers relevant desires, expectations, and needs.
Perceived value: the public transit passengers overall appraisal
of the value of the service provided, based on their assessment of
what is received (benets) and what is given (costs or sacrice).
Service quality: the public transit passengers assessment of the
standard of the service delivered.
Involvement: the level of interest in or importance of public
transit to a passenger.
321
Average (day)
Fig. 3. KMRT ridership.
322
Forty-ve percent were aged between 25 and 34, and 30.9% were
between 15 and 24. Students, housewives, and civil servants
accounted for 53.5% of the sample.
Table 1
Factor analysis of involvement.
Factor/item
Factor loading
Involvement (INV)
INV5: Taking public transit is important to my daily life
INV6: I feel that taking public transit is consistent with my lifestyle
INV3: No matter what the trip purpose is, I always prefer taking public transit
INV2: Whether the weather is good or bad, I always prefer taking public transit
INV7: I like others to know the fact that I take public transit
INV1: Whether there is time pressure or not, I always prefer taking public transit
INV4: I like the feeling of taking public transit
INV8: I always pay attention to the information about public transit
INV9: I believe taking public transit will change how people judge me
0.83
0.83
0.82
0.80
0.79
0.76
0.74
0.73
0.58
Eigenvalues
Variance
explained (%)
Cronbach a
5.29
58.84
0.91
Table 2
Factor analysis of service quality.
Factor/item
Core service (CS)
SQ4: general information provision
SQ3: network coverage
SQ2: service provision hours
SQ5: prices of tickets
SQ1: service frequency
SQ8: complaint dealing
SQ6: ticket selling network
SQ9: train information provision
SQ7: personnel behavior
Psychical environment (PE)
SQ13: facility cleanliness
SQ15: vehicle cleanliness
SQ18: vehicle safety
SQ14: safety at terminals and stops
SQ19: vehicle stability
SQ12: conditions at terminals and stops
SQ17: onboard information provision
Factor loading
Eigenvalue
Cronbach a
8.17
28.12
0.89
1.29
27.48
0.88
0.73
0.73
0.69
0.67
0.64
0.64
0.59
0.58
0.52
0.75
0.75
0.74
0.73
0.71
0.65
0.65
323
Mean
S.D.
IN
SQ
PV
SAT
BI
IN
SQ
PV
SAT
BI
3.77
3.92
3.81
4.14
3.97
0.66
0.52
0.70
0.68
0.73
0.62
0.69
0.56
0.64
0.86
0.66
0.63
0.60
0.83
0.58
0.60
0.63
0.85
Note: The values on the diagonal are square roots of average variance extracted.
0.17 (2.95)
Service
quality
0.75 (18.64)
0.49 (9.17)
Satisfaction
0.24 (4.55)
0.25 (4.80)
Perceived
value
0.31 (7.98)
Behavioral
intention
0.09 (2.54)
Involvement
0.27 (6.38)
0.50 (9.62)
0.18 (3.24)
Fig. 4. The estimated model.
Table 3
CFA for the measurement model.
Constructs
Involvement (IN)
Service quality (SQ)
Perceived value (PV)
Satisfaction (SAT)
Behavioral intention (BI)
Items
INV
CS
PE
PV1
PV2
PV3
OSAT
BI1
BI2
Item reliability
Factor
loading
Standard
errors
Error variance
t-value
1.00
0.90
0.82
0.80
0.80
0.89
1.00
0.88
0.82
0.02
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.02
0.03
0.03
0.00
0.19
0.33
0.35
0.35
0.21
0.00
0.22
0.33
39.04
29.14
26.48
23.80
25.34
28.50
39.04
28.82
25.47
Construct
reliability
Average variance
extracted
0.85
0.74
0.87
0.69
0.84
0.72
324
Table 5
Direct, indirect, and total effects of behavior intention.
Path
Effect
Estimates
t-value
Involvement-Behavioral intentions
Direct effect
Indirect effect
Total effect
Direct effect
Indirect effect
Total effect
Direct effect
Indirect effect
Total effect
Direct effect
Indirect effect
Total effect
0.27
0.42
0.69
0.17
0.25
0.42
0.18
0.06
0.24
0.31
0.31
6.30**
10.86**
18.97**
2.95**
7.17**
9.09**
3.24**
3.17**
4.06**
7.98**
7.98**
Satisfaction-Behavioral intentions
nn
Denotes p o 0.01.
1
Due to limited space, the details of the regression results are not reported in
this paper. However, they are available upon request from the authors.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thanks the two anonymous
reviewers for their helpful suggestions and comments and Joyce
Chen for her great assistance in this paper.
References
Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M., 1980. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social
Behavior. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Anderson, W., Sullivan, M., 1993. The antecedents and consequences of customer
satisfaction for rms. Market Sci. 12, 125143.
Beatty, S.E., Kahle, L.R., Homer, P., 1988. The involvementcommitment model:
theory and implications. J. Bus. Res. 16, 149167.
Bennett, R., Hartel, C.E.J., MaColl-Kennedy, J.R., 2005. Experience as a moderator of
involvement and satisfaction on brand loyalty in a business-to-business
setting. J. Bus. Res. 34, 97107.
Bloemer, J.M., de Ruyter, K., 1998. On the relationship between store image, store
satisfaction and store loyalty. Eur. J. Market 32, 499513.
Chen, C.-F., 2008. Investigating structural relationships between service quality,
perceived value, satisfaction, and behavioral intentions for air passengers:
evidence from Taiwan. Transport. Res. Part A 42 (4), 709717.
Chen, C.-F., Tsai, M.-H., 2008. Perceived value, satisfaction, and loyalty of TV travel
product shopping: involvement as a moderator. Tourism Manage. 29, 11661171.
Cronin, J.J., Taylor, S.A., 1992. Measuring service quality: a reexamination and
extension. J. Market 56, 5568.
Cronin, J.J., Brady, M.K., Hult, G.T.M., 2000. Assessing the effects of quality, value
and customer satisfaction on consumer behavioral intentions in service
environments. J. Retail. 76 (2), 193218.
Currie, G., Wallis, I., 2008. Effective ways to grow urban bus marketsa synthesis
of evidence. J. Transp. Geo. 16, 419429.
325
Joreskog,
K., Sorbom,
D., 1996. LISREL 8: Users Reference Guide. Scientic Software
International, Chicago, IL.
Kokkinaki, F., Lunt, P., 1997. The relationship between involvement, attitude
accessibility and attitudebehavioral consistency. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 36, 497609.
Lai, W.T., Lu, J.L., 2007. Modeling the working mode choice, ownership and usage
of car and motorcycle in Taiwan. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for
Transportation Studies, 7, 869895.
Lam, S.Y., Shankar, V., Erramilli, M.K., Murthy, B., 2004. Customer value,
satisfaction, loyalty, and switching costs: an illustration from a business-tobusiness service context. J. Acad. Market. Sci. 32 (3), 293311.
Lovelock, C.H., 2000. Service Marketing 4th edition Prentice Hall International,
New Jersey.
Mass Rapid Transit Bureau, 2009. Kaohsiung Mass Rapid Transit, /http://mtbu.
kcg.gov.twS. Accessed February 25 2009.
Nathanail, E., 2008. Measuring the quality of service for messengers on the
Hellenic railways. Transp. Res. Part A 42, 4866.
Olsen, S.O., 2007. Repurchase loyalty: the role of involvement and satisfaction.
Psychol. Market 24 (4), 315341.
Oliver, R., 1980. A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of
satisfaction decisions. J. Market. Res. 17, 460469.
Oliver, R., 1997. Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer. McGrawHill, New York.
Oliver, R., 1999. Whence consumer loyalty? J. Market 63 (3344) 1999.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A., Berry, L., 1985. A conceptual model of service
quality and its implications for future research. J. Market 49 (4), 4150.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A., Berry, L., 1988. A multiple item scale for
measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. J. Retail. 64 (1), 1240
SERVQUAL.
Petrick, J.F., 2004. The roles of quality, value and satisfaction in predicting cruise
passengers behavioral intentions. J. Travel Res. 42 (4), 397407.
Petrick, J.F., Backman, S.J., 2002. An examination of the construct of perceived
value for the prediction of golf travelers intentions to revisit. J. Travel Res. 41
(1), 3845.
Pritchard, M.P., Havitz, M.E., Howard, D.R., 1999. Analyzing the commitment
loyalty link in service contexts. J. Acad. Market. Sci. 27, 333348.
Richins, M.L., Bloch, P.H., 1991. Post-purchase product satisfaction: incorporating
the effects of involvement and time. J. Bus. Res. 23, 145158.
Transportation Research Board, 1999. A handbook for measuring customer
satisfaction and service quality. TRCP Report 47.
Transportation Research Board, 2004. Transit capacity and quality of service
manual. TRCP Report 100 (2nd edition).
Tsiotsou, R., 2006. The role of perceived product quality and overall satisfaction on
purchase intentions. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 30 (2), 207217.
Tyrinopoulos, Y., Antonious, C., 2008. Public transit user satisfaction: variability
and policy implications. Trans. Pol. 15, 260272.
Woodruff, R.B., 1997. Customer value: the next source for competitive edge.
J. Acad. Market. Sci. 25 (2), 139153.
Yang, Z., Peterson, R.T., 2004. Customer perceived value, satisfaction, and loyalty:
the role of switching costs. Psychol. Market 21 (10), 799822.
Zaichkowsky, J.L., 1985. Measuring the involvement construct. J. Consumer Res. 12
(3), 341352.
Zaichkowsky, J.L., 1994. The personal involvement inventory: reduction, reversion,
and application to advertising. J. Advertising 23 (4), 5970.
Zeithaml, V.A., 1988. Consumer perceptions of price, quality and value: a meansend model and synthesis of evidence. J. Market 52 (July), 222.
Zeithaml, V.A., Berry, L.L., Parasuraman, A., 1996. The behavioral consequences of
service quality. J. Market 60 (2), 3146.