Scribd
Upload
127 views

Animation Rubric

The animation scoring rubric evaluates student animation projects on several criteria using a scale of 1 to 4 points. It assesses the quality of students' project proposals, storyboards, originality, technical animation, design work, use of sound, spelling and grammar, transitions and special effects, and effort level. The highest scores are for projects that have clear proposals aligned to curriculum, logical storyboards that teach viewers, high originality, strong technical execution, professional design, effective use of sound and effects, and students who stay focused on tasks.

Uploaded by

ross_tec
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
127 views

Animation Rubric

The animation scoring rubric evaluates student animation projects on several criteria using a scale of 1 to 4 points. It assesses the quality of students' project proposals, storyboards, originality, technical animation, design work, use of sound, spelling and grammar, transitions and special effects, and effort level. The highest scores are for projects that have clear proposals aligned to curriculum, logical storyboards that teach viewers, high originality, strong technical execution, professional design, effective use of sound and effects, and students who stay focused on tasks.

Uploaded by

ross_tec
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Animation Sco ring Rubric

Point Values
Project
Proposal

Topic
Curriculum
Alignment

Storyboards

Originality

4
-Excellent proposal with
clear description of project
including the initials of the
teacher responsible for
your chosen curriculum
area
-Clear evidence of
connection to target
curriculum
-Frequent and clear
references are made to
facts, concepts, and ideas
from cited resources
-Viewers will learn from
this project
-Complete storyboard
depicting scenes and action
in a logical and interesting
sequence
-Project has gone above
and beyond
-All information is clear,
appropriate, and correct
-Story has a beginning,
middle, and end
-The project shows
significant evidence of
originality and
inventiveness
-The majority of the
content and many of the
ideas are fresh and
inventive

-Complete proposal with clear


description of project including
the initials of the teacher
responsible for your chosen
curriculum area

- Incomplete proposal
lacking a clear description
of project or missing the
initials of the teacher
responsible for your
chosen curriculum area
-Adequate evidence of
-Some evidence of
connection to target curriculum
connection to target
-Viewers are likely to learn from curriculum
this project
-Viewers may learn from
this project

-No proposal or late


proposal

-Storyboard contains most


scenes and action in a logical
sequence
-Storyline is evident in much of
the product
-Information is clear,
appropriate, and correct

-An attempt at creating a


storyline is evident
-Some scenes and some
action, the sequence and
logic are weak and
confusing - audience
cannot follow

-Did not utilize the


storyboard during the
process
AND /OR
-Incomplete or not
submitted

-The project shows some


evidence of originality and
inventiveness
-While based on an extensive
collection of other peoples
ideas, products, images and
inventions, the work extends
beyond that collection to offer
new insights

-The work is an extensive


collection and rehash of
other peoples ideas,
products, images and
inventions
-There is little evidence
of new thought or
inventiveness

-The work is a minimal


collection or rehash of
other peoples ideas,
products, images and
inventions
-There is no evidence of
new thought

-No evidence of connection


to target curriculum
-Viewers are not likely to
learn from this project

Animation

-Excellent technical
animation
-All images enhance the
content

-Good technical animation


-Most images enhance the
content

-Excellent design with a


good selection of fonts and
color

-Little technical animation


-Clip Art or original images
move around screen with no
attempt at articulation
-Most images enhance the
content
-Good design with a good
selection of fonts and color
and animation

-All images are clip


art or recycled from
the Internet
-No real attempt to
learn to animate these
images
-Poor design with a
limited selection of
fonts and color

Design

-Exceptional design with a


good selection of fonts and
color

Sound

-Excellent use of sound

-Good use of sound

-Fair use of sound

Text spelling
and grammar

-Project honors all rules


of spelling and/ or
grammar

-Project minimally honors


rules of spelling and / or
grammar; fewer that 3 errors

Transitions and
special effects

-Transitions and special


effects were effective and
enhanced the animation
-Consistently stayed
focused on the task and
what needed to be done Very self-directed

-Project adequately
honors most rules of
spelling and/ or grammar;
one or two mistakes
-Transitions and special
effects were very
effective
-Focused on the task and
what needed to be done
most of the time

-Ineffective transitions

-Poor or inappropriate
use of sound
-Project has multiple
(4 or more) errors in
spelling and / or
grammar
-None used

-Focused on the task and


what needed to be done some
of the time; needed many
reminders to keep on-task

-Rarely stayed focused


on the task, and
reminders to refocus
rarely worked for long

Effort

You might also like