ENRICO R.

MACARAEG
COMMUNICATIONS
BSECE-5

WIRELESS
September 27, 2015

Link Budget
When designing a complete, i.e. end to end radio communications system, it is necessary to calculate what
is termed the link budget. The link budget enables factors such as the required antennas gain levels, radio
transmitter power levels, and receiver sensitivity figures to be determined. By assessing the link budget, it
is possible to design the system so that it meets its requirements and performs correctly without being
over designed at extra cost.
Link budgets are often used for satellite systems. In these situations it is crucial that the required signal
levels are maintained to ensure that the received signal levels are sufficiently high above the noise level to
ensure that signal to noise levels or bit error rates are within the required limits. However larger antennas,
high transmitter power levels that required add considerably to the cost, so it is necessary to balance
these to minimise the cost of the system while still maintaining performance.
In addition to satellite systems, link budgets are also used in many other radio communications systems.
For example, link budget calculations are used for calculating the power levels required for cellular
communications systems, and for investigating the base station coverage.
Link budget style calculations are also used within wireless survey tools. These wireless survey tools will
not only look at the way radio signals propagate, but also the power levels, antennas and receiver
sensitivity levels required to provide the required link quality.

What is link budget?

As the name implies, a link budget is an accounting of all the gains and losses in a transmission system.
The link budget looks at the elements that will determine the signal strength arriving at the receiver. The
link budget may include the following items:

Transmitter power.

Antenna gains (receiver and transmitter).

Antenna feeder losses (receiver and transmitter).

Path losses.

Receiver sensitivity (although this is not part of the actual link budget, it is necessary to know this
to enable any pass fail criteria to be applied.

Where the losses may vary with time, e.g. fading, and allowance must be made within the link budget for
this - often the worst case may be taken, or alternatively an acceptance of periods of increased bit error
rate (for digital signals) or degraded signal to noise ratio for analogue systems.

In essence the link budget will take the form of the equation below:

Received power (dBm)

Transmitted power (dBm)

gains (db)

losses (dB)

The basic calculation to determine the link budget is quite straightforward. It is mainly a matter of
accounting for all the different losses and gains between the transmitter and the receiver.

Link budget equation

In order to devise a link budget equation, it is necessary to investigate all the areas where gains and losses
may occur between the transmitter and the receiver. Although guidelines and suggestions can be made
regarding the possible areas for losses and gains, each link has to be analysed on its own merits..
A typical link budget equation for a radio communications system may look like the following:

PRX

PTX

PTX

GTX

GRX

LTX

LFS

LP

LRX

Where:
PRX = received power (dBm)
PTX = transmitter output power (dBm)
GTX = transmitter antenna gain (dBi)
GRX = receiver antenna gain (dBi)
LTX = transmit feeder and associated losses (feeder, connectors, etc.) (dB)
LFS = free space loss or path loss (dB)
LP = miscellaneous signal propagation losses (these include fading margin, polarization mismatch,
losses associated with medium through which signal is travelling, other losses...) (dB)
LRX = receiver feeder and associated losses (feeder, connectors, etc.) (d)B
NB for the sake of showing losses in the link budget equation is "minus" actual loss figures, e.g. LTX or LFS,
etc should be taken as the modulus of the loss.

Antenna gain and link budget

The basic link budget equation where no levels of antenna gain are included assumes that the power
spreads out equally in all directions from the source. In other words the antenna is an isotropic source,
radiating equally in all directions.
This assumption is good for theoretical calculations, but in reality all antennas radiate more in some
directions than others. In addition to this it is often necessary to use antennas with gain to enable
interference from other directions to be reduced at the receiver, and at the transmitter to focus the
available transmitter power in the required direction.
In view of this it is necessary to accommodate these gains into the link budget equation as they have been
in the equation above because they will affect the signal levels - increasing them by levels of the antenna

gain, assuming the gain is in the direction of the required link.When quoting gain levels for antennas it is
necessary to ensure they are gains when compared to an isotropic source, i.e. the basic type of antenna
assumed in the equation when no gain levels are incorporated. The gain figures relative to an isotropic
source are quoted as dBi, i.e. dB relative to an isotropic source. Often gain levels given for an antenna may
be the gain relative to a dipole where the figures may be quoted as dBd, i.e. dB relative to a dipole.
However a dipole has gain relative to an isotropic source, so the dipole gain of 2.1 dBi needs to be
accommodated if figures relative to a dipole are quoted for an antenna gain..

Effect of multipath propagation

For true free space propagation such as that encountered for satellites there will be no noticeable
reflections and there will only be one major path. However for terrestrial systems, the signal may reach the
receiver via a number of different paths as a result of reflections, etc that will occur as a result of the
objects around the path. Buildings, trees, objects around the office and home can all cause reflections that
will result in the signal variations.
The multipath propagation will cause variations of the signal strength when compared to that calculated
from the free space path loss. If the signals arrive in phase with the direct signal, then the reflected signals
will tend to reinforce the direct signal. If they are out of phase, then they will tend to cancel the signal. If
either the transmitter or receiver moves, then the signal strength will be seen to vary as the relative
strengths and phases of the different signals change.
In order to allow for this in a link budget, a link margin is added into the equation to allow for this.
Link budget calculations are an essential step in the design of a radio communications system. The link
budget calculation enables the losses and gains to be seen, and devising a link budget enables the
apportionment of losses, gains and power levels to be made if changes need to be made to enable the
radio communications system to meet its operational requirements. Only by performing a link budget
analysis is this possible.

Radio Signal Path Loss

Radio signal path loss is a particularly important element in the design of any radio communications
system or wireless system. The radio signal path loss will determine many elements of the radio
communications system in particular the transmitter power, and the antennas, especially their gain, height
and general location. The radio path loss will also affect other elements such as the required receiver
sensitivity, the form of transmission used and several other factors.
As a result, it is necessary to understand the reasons for radio path loss, and to be able to determine the
levels of the signal loss for a give radio path.
The signal path loss can often be determined mathematically and these calculations are often undertaken
when preparing coverage or system design activities. These depend on a knowledge of the signal
propagation properties.

Accordingly, path loss calculations are used in many radio and wireless survey tools for determining signal
strength at various locations. These wireless survey tools are being increasingly used to help determine
what radio signal strengths will be, before installing the equipment. For cellular operators radio coverage
surveys are important because the investment in a macrocell base station is high. Also, wireless survey
tools provide a very valuable service for applications such as installing wireless LAN systems in large
offices and other centres because they enable problems to be solved before installation, enabling costs to
be considerably reduced. Accordingly there is an increasing importance being placed onto wireless survey
tools and software.

Signal path loss basics

The signal path loss is essentially the reduction in power density of an electromagnetic wave or signal as it
propagates through the environment in which it is travelling.
There are many reasons for the radio path loss that may occur:

Free space loss: The free space loss occurs as the signal travels through space without any other
effects attenuating the signal it will still diminish as it spreads out. This can be thought of as the
radio communications signal spreading out as an ever increasing sphere. As the signal has to cover
a wider area, conservation of energy tells us that the energy in any given area will reduce as the
area covered becomes larger.

Absorption losses:

Absorption losses occur if the radio signal passes into a medium which is not

totally transparent to radio signals. This can be likened to a light signal passing through transparent
glass.

Diffraction:

Diffraction losses occur when an object appears in the path. The signal can diffract

around the object, but losses occur. The loss is higher the more rounded the object. Radio signals
tend to diffract better around sharp edges.

Multipath:

In a real terrestrial environment, signals will be reflected and they will reach the

receiver via a number of different paths. These signals may add or subtract from each other
depending upon the relative phases of the signals. If the receiver is moved the scenario will change
and the overall received signal will be found vary with position. Mobile receivers (e.g. cellular
telecommunications phones) will be subject to this effect which is known as Rayleigh fading.

Terrain: The terrain over which signals travel will have a significant effect on the signal. Obviously
hills which obstruct the path will considerably attenuate the signal, often making reception
impossible. Additionally at low frequencies the composition of the earth will have a marked effect.
For example on the Long Wave band, it is found that signals travel best over more conductive
terrain, e.g. sea paths or over areas that are marshy or damp. Dry sandy terrain gives higher levels
of attenuation.

Buildings and vegetation:

For mobile applications, buildings and other obstructions including

vegetation have a marked effect. Not only will buildings reflect radio signals, they will also absorb
them. Cellular communications are often significantly impaired within buildings. Trees and foliage
can attenuate radio signals, particularly when wet.

Atmosphere:

The atmosphere can affect radio signal paths. At lower frequencies, especially

below 30 - 50MHz, the ionosphere has a significant effect, reflecting (or more correctly refracting)
them back to Earth. At frequencies above 50 MHz and more the troposphere has a major effect,
refracting the signals back to earth as a result of changing refractive index. For UHF broadcast this
can extend coverage to approximately a third beyond the horizon.
These reasons represent some of the major elements causing signal path loss for any radio system.

Predicting path loss

One of the key reasons for understanding the various elements affecting radio signal path loss is to be able
to predict the loss for a given path, or to predict the coverage that may be achieved for a particular base
station, broadcast station, etc.
Although prediction or assessment can be fairly accurate for the free space scenarios, for real life
terrestrial applications it is not easy as there are many factors to take into consideration, and it is not
always possible to gain accurate assessments of the effects they will have.
Despite this there are wireless survey tools and radio coverage prediction software programmes that are
available to predict radio path loss and estimate coverage. A variety of methods are used to undertake
this.
Free space path loss varies in strength as an inverse square law, i.e. 1/(range)^2, or 20 dB per decade
increase in range. This calculation is very simple to implement, but real life terrestrial calculations of signal
path loss are far more involved.
Most path loss predictions are made using techniques outlined below:

Statistical methods:

Statistical methods of predicting signal path loss rely on measured and

averaged losses for typical types of radio links. These figures are entered into the prediction model
which is able to calculate the figures based around the data. A variety of models can be used
dependent upon the application. This type of approach is normally used for planning cellular
networks, estimating the coverage of PMR (Private Mobile Radio) links and for broadcast coverage
planning.

Deterministic approach: This approach to radio signal path loss and coverage prediction utilises
the basic physical laws as the basis for the calculations. These methods need to take into
consideration all the elements within a given area and although they tend to give more accurate
results, they require much additional data and computational power. In view of their complexity,
they tend to be used for short range links where the amount of required data falls within acceptable
limits.

These wireless survey tools and radio coverage software packages are growing in their capabilities.
However it is still necessary to have a good understanding of radio propagation so that the correct figures
can be entered and the results interpreted satisfactorily.

Radio signal path loss can be caused by many factors. Only in the free space scenario is the calculation
straightforward. In a terrestrial environment there are many factors that affect the actual RF path loss.
When planning any radio or wireless system, it is necessary to have a broad understanding the elements
that give rise to the path loss, and in this way design the system accordingly.

Free Space Path Loss: Details and Formula

The free space path loss, FSPL, is used in many areas for predicting radio signal strengths that may be
expected in a radio system.
Although the free space path loss does not hold for most terrestrial situations because of other effects from
the ground, objects in the path and the like, there are still very many situations in which it can be used. It
is also useful as the basis for understanding many real life radio propagation situations.
Accordingly, the free space path loss, FSPL, is an essential basic parameter for many RF calculations. It can
often be used as a first approximation for many short range calculations. Alternatively it can be used as a
first approximation for a number of areas where there are few obstructions. As such it is a valuable tool for
many people dealing with radio communications systems.

Free space path loss

In addition to this, these free space path loss, FSPL, calculations can be used in wireless survey tools where
the free space loss is calculated and other scenarios added to provide an overall view of the signal
strength at a given point. With the growing requirements to be able to analyse wireless or radio coverage,
wireless survey tools are being used increasingly to enable coverage to be predicted at the early stages of
design. Accordingly these wireless survey tools are being used increasingly in the development and
installation of radio and wireless systems.

Free space path loss basics

The free space path loss, also known as FSPL is the loss in signal strength that occurs when an
electromagnetic wave travels over a line of sight path in free space. In these circumstances there are no
obstacles that might cause the signal to be reflected refracted, or that might cause additional attenuation.
The free space path loss calculations only look at the loss of the path itself and do not contain any factors
relating to the transmitter power, antenna gains or the receiver sensitivity levels. These factors are
normally address when calculating a link budget and these will also be used within radio and wireless
survey tools and software.

To understand the reasons for the free space path loss, it is possible to imagine a signal spreading out from
a transmitter. It will move away from the source spreading out in the form of a sphere. As it does so, the
surface area of the sphere increases. As this will follow the law of the conservation of energy, as the
surface area of the sphere increases, so the intensity of the signal must decrease.
As a result of this it is found that the signal decreases in a way that is inversely proportional to the square
of the distance from the source of the radio signal in free space.

Whilst the free space path loss is taken to be inversely proportional to the square of the distance, in most
terrestrial (non-free space) cases this basic formula has to be altered because of the effects of the earth
and obstacles including trees, hills, buildings, etc.. In these cases the exponent value is typically in the
range of 2 to 4. In some environments, such as buildings, stadiums and other indoor environments, the
path loss exponent can reach values in the range of 4 to 6. In other words for the very worst case
scenarios the signal may fall as the distance to the power six.
Tunnels which can act as a form of waveguide can result in a path loss exponent values of less than 2.
As an example many cellular operators base their calculations for terrestrial signal reduction around the
inverse of the distance to the power 4.

Free space path loss formula

The free space path loss formula or free space path loss equation is quite simple to use. Not only is the
path loss proportional to the square of the distance between the transmitter and receiver, but the signal
level is also proportional to the square of the frequency in use for other reasons explained in a section
below.

Where:
FSPL is the Free space path loss
d is the distance of the receiver from the transmitter (metres)
is the signal wavelength (metres)

f is the signal frequency (Hertz)

c is the speed of light in a vacuum (metres per second)
The speed of light is 2.99792458 x 10^8 metres per second, although for most practical purposes, this is
taken to be 3 x 10^8 metres per second.
The free space path loss formula is applicable to situations where only the electromagnetic wave is
present, i.e. for far field situations. It does not hold true for near field situations.

Free space loss formula frequency dependency

Although the free space loss equation given above seems to indicate that the loss is frequency dependent.
The attenuation provided by the distance travelled in space is not dependent upon the frequency. This is
constant.
The reason for the frequency dependence is that the equation contains two effects:
1. The first results from the spreading out of the energy as the sphere over which the energy is spread
increases in area. This is described by the inverse square law.
2. The second effect results from the antenna aperture change. This affects the way in which any
antenna can pick up signals and this term is frequency dependent.
As one constituent of the path loss equation is frequency dependent, this means that there is a frequency
dependency within the complete equation.

Decibel version of free space path loss equation

Most RF comparisons and measurements are performed in decibels. This gives an easy and consistent
method to compare the signal levels present at various points. Accordingly it is very convenient to express
the free space path loss formula, FSPL, in terms of decibels. It is easy to take the basic free space path loss
equation and manipulate into a form that can be expressed in a logarithmic format.

Where:
d is
the
distance
f is the signal frequency (MHz)

of

the

receiver

Effect of antenna gain on path loss equation

from

the

transmitter

(km)

The free space path loss equation above does not include any component for antenna gains. It is assumed
that the antenna gain is unity for both the transmitter. In reality, though, all antennas will have a certain
amount of gain and this will affect the overall signal level. Any antenna gain will reduce the "loss" when
compared to a unity gain system. The figures for antenna gain are relative to an isotropic source, i.e. an
antenna that radiates equally in all directions.

Path loss parameters

Where:
Gtx is the gain of the transmitter antenna relative to an
Grx is the gain of the receiver antenna relative to an isotropic source (dBi)

isotropic

source

(dBi)

Normally the transmitter and receiver gain levels will incorporate any feeder losses which are subtracted
from the antenna gain. In this way performance between the transmitter and receiver interfaces are
provided.
The path loss equation or formula given above, is an essential tool that is required when making
calculations for radio and wireless systems either manually or within applications such as wireless survey
tools, etc. By using the path loss equation, it is possible to determine the signal strengths that may be
expected in many scenarios. While the path loss formula is not fully applicable where there are other
interactions, e.g. reflection, refraction, etc as are present in most real life applications, the equation can
nevertheless be used to give an indication of what may be expected. It is obviously fully applicable to
satellite systems where the paths conform closely to the totally free space scenarios.