Design and Analysis of A Rocker Arm
Design and Analysis of A Rocker Arm
ISSN (e): 2250 3005 || Volume, 05 || Issue, 09 ||September 2015 ||
International Journal of Computational Engineering Research (IJCER)
Design and Analysis of a Rocker Arm
Jafar Sharief1, K.Durga Sushmitha2
1
Mtech student, Nimra College of engineering & technology, Ibrahimpattanam, AP, INDIA,
Guide (Asst.Professor), Nimra College of engineering & technology, Ibrahimpattanam, AP, INDIA.
ABSTRACT
Rocker arms are part of the valve-actuating mechanism. A rocker arm is designed to pivot on a pivot
pin or shaft that is secured to a bracket. The bracket is mounted on the cylinder head. One end of a
rocker arm is in contact with the top of the valve stem, and the other end is actuated by the camshaft.
In installations where the camshaft is located below the cylinder head, the rocker arms
are actuated by pushrods. The lifters have rollers which are forced by the valve springs to follow the
profiles of the cams. Failure of rocker arm is a measure concern as it is one of the important
components of push rod IC engines.Present work finds the various stresses under extreme load
condition. For this we are modeling the arm using design software and the stressed regions are
found out usingAnsys software. Here in this thesis we are observing that by changing different
materials how the stresses are varying in the rocker arm under extreme load condition. And after
comparing results we are proposing best suitable material for the rocker arm under extreme load
conditions.
Key words:Ansys, camshaft, pro-e and rocker arm
I.
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Introduction and working of Rocker arm
Rocker arm is an important part of the valve train in fuel injection system providing not only the means of
actuating the valves through a fulcrum utilizing the lifter and the push rod but also provide a means of
multiplying the lift ratio. Cam shaft design has advanced in leaps and bounds over last three decades but
overhead valve engines with centrally located camshafts still use lifters and push rod and rocker arms as a
means of opening and closing the intake and exhaust valves in fuel injection pumps. Advancement in materials
used in construction of rocker arm for reducing the noise, weight and higher strength for efficient operation is
going on throughout the globe since long. The usual materials used for such purpose are Steel, Aluminum, and
Forged steel to Stainless steel, alloys and composites. The success to investigate the possibility creating a light
weight rocker arm that could provide a friction reducing fulcrum using needle bearings and a roller tip for
reduced friction between the rocker and the valve stem but still be less expensive than steel lies in the
development of composite rocker arms. Lighter mass at the valve is also allowed for increased speed while
strength of the material caters to durability. The rocker arm usually operates at 40-500 C and the maximum
pressure is exerted by the gas. Therefore in this investigation it has been thought proper to analyze a composite
rocker arm of high density polyethylene (HDPE) reinforced with short S-glass fibers of 10% volume fraction.
Finite element analysis may be carried out to determine the stresses and make a comparison between steel and
composite to predict the failure modes.
Fig.1 Rocker armFig.2 Position of Rocker arm
www.ijceronline.com
Open Access Journal
Page 40
Design And Analysis of a Rocker
II.
MODELLING BY USING PRO-E
Fig.3 Solid model
III.
Fig .4 Wire frame model
ANALYSIS BY ANSYS
Fig.5 Imported model
Fig.6 Meshed model
Fig.7 Load distribution at endFig.8 Load distribution at pin
IV.
Fig.9 Load distribution at pin and end
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
4.1 Structural analysis
4.1.1 Load distribution at end
a)
Alloy steel -1
Fig.10 Total deformation
b)
Fig.11 Stress intensity
Alloy steel -2
Fig.12 Total deformation
www.ijceronline.com
Fig.13 Stress intensity
Open Access Journal
Page 41
Design And Analysis of a Rocker
c)
d)
Composite material
Fig.14 Total deformation
Fig.15 Stress intensity
Fig.16 Total deformation
Fig.17 Stress intensity
Steel
4.1.2 Load distribution at pin
a)
Alloy steel -1
Fig.18 Total deformation
b)
Alloy steel -2
Fig.20 Total deformation
c)
Fig.19 Stress intensity
Fig.21 Stress intensity
Composite material
Fig.22 Total deformation
www.ijceronline.com
Fig.23 Stress intensity
Open Access Journal
Page 42
Design And Analysis of a Rocker
d)
Steel
Fig.24 Total deformation
Fig.25 Stress intensity
4.1.3 Load distribution atboth pin and end
a)
Alloy steel -1
Fig.26 Total deformation
b)
Alloy steel -2
Fig.28 Total deformation
c)
Fig.29 Stress intensity
Composite material
Fig.30 Total deformation
d)
Fig.27 Stress intensity
Fig.31 Stress intensity
Steel
Fig.32 Total deformation
4.2 Results and comparisons
4.2.1 Load at pin
SNO
1
2
3
4
www.ijceronline.com
Fig.33 Stress intensity
MATERIAL
TOTAL
STRESS
DEFORMATION INTENSITY
Alloy steel-1
.2262
4246
Alloy steel -2
.2364
4254
Composite
.1785
4236
Steel
.2476
4261
Table no.1 Load deformation at pin
Open Access Journal
Page 43
Design And Analysis of a Rocker
4.2.2 Load at end
SNO
1
2
3
4
MATERIAL
TOTAL
STRESS
DEFORMATION INTENSITY
Alloy steel-1
2.451
4295
Alloy steel -2
2.566
424
Composite
1.928
4317
Steel
2.692
4274
Table no.2 Load deformation at end
4.2.3 Load at both pin and end
SNO MATERIAL
1
2
3
4
TOTAL
STRESS
DEFORMATION INTENSITY
Alloy steel-1
2.451
4295
Alloy steel -2
2.566
4284
Composite
1.928
4317
Steel
2.693
4274
Table no.3 Load deformation at pin and end
V. CONCLUSION
The modeling of the rocker arm is done by using pro-e and the analysis is performed by Ansys. The project
consists of structural analysis of rocker arm which is done to find the strength of the model. To find the strength
of the model in structural analysis we are taken 4 different materials and taken 3 load points on the model. We
did analysis on the model by applying loads at pin and end side by varying different 4 materials.By the results
we observed that the stress values of steel and alloy steel materials are nearer to each other and also for the total
deformation the values of the steel and alloy steel got nearly same values. But only composite material got the
better values in stress intensity and total deformation when compared to other materials.So by the investigation
we conclude that by using composite material the stress values are reduced by that the life time of the rocker
arm increases.
Future scope
1.
By changing the model design and reducing the thickness we may get better values.
2.
And also by using advanced smart materials we can increase the performance of the model.
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
Z.W. Yu, X.L. Xu Failure analysis of diesel engine rocker arms Engineering Failure Analysis, Volume 13, Issue 4, June 2006,
Pages 598-605
Chin-Sung Chung, Ho-Kyung Kim "Safety evaluation of the rocker arm of a diesel engine Materials & Design,
Volume 31, Issue 2, February 2010, Pages 940-945`
Dong-Woo Lee, Soo-Jin Lee, Seok-Swoo Cho , Won-Sik Joo Failure of rocker arm shaft for 4-cylinder SOHC engine
Dong Woo Lee, Seok Swoo Cho and Won Sik Joo An estimation of failure stress condition in rocker arm shaft through FEA
and microscopic fractography
Giovanni Scire Mammano and Eugenio Dragoni (2013), Design and Testing of an Enhanced Shape Memory Actuator
Elastically Compensated by a Bistable Rocker Arm, Structures Journal ofIntelligent Material Systems andStructures.
Hendriksma N, Kunz T and Greene C (2007), Design and Development of a 2-Step Rocker Arm, SAE International, USA.
Satpathy, Sukanya, Jose, Jobin, Nag, Ahin and Nando, G.B., Short Glass Fiber Filled Waste Plastic (PE) Composites- Studies
on Thermal and Mechanical Properties, Progress in Rubber, Plastics and Recycling Technology, Vol.24, No.3, pp.199-218,
2008.
Chung, Chin-Sung and Kim Ho-Kyung, Safety Evaluation of the Rocker Arm of a Diesel Engine, Materials and Design,
Vol.31 (2), pp.940-945, 2010.
Kun Cheng, Finite element analysis of Rocker Arm of Vertical Roller Mill on ANSYS work Bench Advanced Materials
Research, Vol.230-232, pp.824-828, 2011.
Yang, Changxing., Li, Guan, Qi, Rongrong and Huang, Mark, Glass Fibre/Wood Flour Modified High Density Polyethylene
Composites, Jou. of Applied Polymer Science, Vol.123, pp.2084-2089, 2012.
www.ijceronline.com
Open Access Journal
Page 44
